A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Gold World News Flash

Gold World News Flash


Silver and Gold Prices Both Closed Lower with the Gold Price Closing at $1,307.20

Posted: 10 Oct 2013 12:33 AM PDT

Gold Price Close Today : 1,307.20
Change : -17.40 or -1.31%

Silver Price Close Today : 21.89
Change : -0.55  or -2.46%

Gold Silver Ratio Today : 59.71
Change : 0.69 or 1.17%

Franklin is travelling this week, but he wanted y'all to receive today's prices, below.
God willing, Franklin will return on Monday, 14 October 2013.

Argentum et aurum comparenda sunt -- -- Gold and silver must be bought.

- Franklin Sanders, The Moneychanger
The-MoneyChanger.com

© 2013, The Moneychanger. May not be republished in any form, including electronically, without our express permission. To avoid confusion, please remember that the comments above have a very short time horizon. Always invest with the primary trend. Gold's primary trend is up, targeting at least $3,130.00; silver's primary is up targeting 16:1 gold/silver ratio or $195.66; stocks' primary trend is down, targeting Dow under 2,900 and worth only one ounce of gold or 18 ounces of silver. or 18 ounces of silver. US $ and US$-denominated assets, primary trend down; real estate bubble has burst, primary trend down.

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER. Be advised and warned:

Do NOT use these commentaries to trade futures contracts. I don't intend them for that or write them with that short term trading outlook. I write them for long-term investors in physical metals. Take them as entertainment, but not as a timing service for futures.

NOR do I recommend investing in gold or silver Exchange Trade Funds (ETFs). Those are NOT physical metal and I fear one day one or another may go up in smoke. Unless you can breathe smoke, stay away. Call me paranoid, but the surviving rabbit is wary of traps.

NOR do I recommend trading futures options or other leveraged paper gold and silver products. These are not for the inexperienced.

NOR do I recommend buying gold and silver on margin or with debt.

What DO I recommend? Physical gold and silver coins and bars in your own hands.

One final warning: NEVER insert a 747 Jumbo Jet up your nose.

Figures Don’t Lie, but Liars Figure

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 11:00 PM PDT

by Frank Holmes, Daily Reckoning.com.au:

Gold took quite a beating in September, bucking its seasonal average monthly return of 2.3%. The political battle between President Barack Obama and Congress, China's Golden Week, and India's gold import restrictions likely weighed on the metal.

September's correction only adds to the negative sentiment toward the precious metal. The assumption from many market pundits is that gold is no longer attractive as an investment. With rising rates and continuing low inflation, U.S. investors believe they have a solid case for selling their holdings.

Read More @ DailyReckoning.com.au

Grandich discusses gold market manipulation with Wall Street for Main Street

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 09:38 PM PDT

12:36p ChST Thursday, October 10, 2013

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Market analyst and mining company consultant Peter Grandich discusses gold market manipulation with Wall Street for Main Street's John Manfreda in a 19-minute interview posted at YouTube yesterday:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy_vq3oI8u4&feature=youtu.bef

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Don't Let Cyprus Happen to You

Depositors at the Bank of Cyprus lost 47.5 percent of their savings. So to preserve your wealth, get some of it outside the banking system into physical gold and silver.

Worldwide Precious Metals (Canada) Ltd., established in 2001, specializes in physical gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. We offer delivery or secure and fully insured storage outside the banking system in Brinks vaults. We have access to gold and silver from trusted worldwide refineries and suppliers. And when you have an account with us you have immediate access to it for buying and selling your stored bullion.

For information on owning physical precious metals in your portfolio, visit us at: www.wwpmc.com.



Join GATA here:

Louis Boulanger Now Seminar
Visitors Center, Holy Trinity Parnell
Auckland, New Zeland
Sunday, October 13, 2013

http://www.gata.org/files/GATAInNewZealand.pdf

Gold Investment Symposium 2013
Luna Park Conference Center, Sydney, Australia
Wednesday-Thursday, October 16-17, 2013

http://gold.symposium.net.au/

The Silver Summit
Davenport Hotel, Spokane, Washington
Thursday-Friday, October 24-25, 2013

http://www.cambridgehouse.com/event/silver-summit-2013

Mines and Money Australia
Melbourne Conference and Exhibition Centre
Tuesday, October 29-Friday, November 1, 2013

http://www.minesandmoney.com/

New Orleans Investment Conference
Sunday-Wednesday, November 10-13, 2013
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
New Orleans, Louisiana

https://jeffersoncompanies.com/landing/speakers?IDPromotion=613011610080...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing DVDs of our London conference in August 2011 or our Dawson City conference in August 2006:

http://www.goldrush21.com/order.html

Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16

Chilling Truth About What Will Happen When The US Implodes

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 09:01 PM PDT

Today a man who has lived in 18 countries around the world, and witnessed collapses in many of these countries firsthand, told King World News, "What shocks the people is how quickly things can flip. One day everything seems to be alright, and the next day there is panic." Keith Barron, who consults with major companies around the world and is responsible for one of the largest gold discoveries in the last quarter century, also spoke about some of the astonishing firsthand accounts of what he witnessed. Below is what Barron had to say.

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Gold and its direct economic impact

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 08:00 PM PDT

by Jan Skoyles, TheRealAsset.co.uk

This morning The Real Asset Company was invited by the World Gold Council to go through their latest report: The Direct Economic Impact of Gold.

The report is designed to set the baseline in future discussion around the value the gold industry brings to both the national and international economic scene.

-          In total, the WGC report states that in 2012 the gold industry generated over $210 billion in to the world's economy in 2012. This is the equivalent GDP to the city of Beijing or the Republic of Ireland.

Read More @ TheRealAsset.co.uk

Kyle Bass Warns: “There Is No Way To Protect Yourself If US Treasuries Default”

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 07:55 PM PDT

from Zero Hedge:

“If the politicians lead us into a ‘prioritization of payments’ situation for Treasury Secretary Lew or an actual missed payment, there is nothing you can do to protect yourself from that!” are the ominous words that Kyle Bass uses to describe the farce that is rapidly approaching (and for now being ignored by stocks). Bass went on to pull no punches in his “disappointment” in JCPenney’s performance (and dilution) coming as close as he can to saying “sell.” But his piece de resistance was a dismal destruction of any silver lining for Puerto Rico and the significant implications that will have on Muni bonds in general.

Read More @ ZeroHedge.com

Silver and Gold Prices Both Closed Lower with the Gold Price Closing at $1,307.20

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 07:32 PM PDT

Gold Price Close Today : 1,307.20
Change : -17.40 or -1.31%

Silver Price Close Today : 21.89
Change : -0.55  or -2.46%

Gold Silver Ratio Today : 59.71
Change : 0.69 or 1.17%

Franklin is travelling this week, but he wanted y'all to receive today's prices, below.
God willing, Franklin will return on Monday, 14 October 2013.

Argentum et aurum comparenda sunt -- -- Gold and silver must be bought.

- Franklin Sanders, The Moneychanger
The-MoneyChanger.com

© 2013, The Moneychanger. May not be republished in any form, including electronically, without our express permission. To avoid confusion, please remember that the comments above have a very short time horizon. Always invest with the primary trend. Gold's primary trend is up, targeting at least $3,130.00; silver's primary is up targeting 16:1 gold/silver ratio or $195.66; stocks' primary trend is down, targeting Dow under 2,900 and worth only one ounce of gold or 18 ounces of silver. or 18 ounces of silver. US $ and US$-denominated assets, primary trend down; real estate bubble has burst, primary trend down.

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER. Be advised and warned:

Do NOT use these commentaries to trade futures contracts. I don't intend them for that or write them with that short term trading outlook. I write them for long-term investors in physical metals. Take them as entertainment, but not as a timing service for futures.

NOR do I recommend investing in gold or silver Exchange Trade Funds (ETFs). Those are NOT physical metal and I fear one day one or another may go up in smoke. Unless you can breathe smoke, stay away. Call me paranoid, but the surviving rabbit is wary of traps.

NOR do I recommend trading futures options or other leveraged paper gold and silver products. These are not for the inexperienced.

NOR do I recommend buying gold and silver on margin or with debt.

What DO I recommend? Physical gold and silver coins and bars in your own hands.

One final warning: NEVER insert a 747 Jumbo Jet up your nose.

Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 07:12 PM PDT

In a little-known 2006 speech (in the US, though widely known around the world), entitled "The End of Dollar Hegemony," Ron Paul discusses the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system - which most people know about - and the de-facto system that replaced it - which most people do not know about. As Casey Research's Nick Giambruno notes it is a must listen with the most important part of the speech where Paul discusses the petrodollar system, a primary factor in maintaining the dollar's role as the world's premier currency after the breakdown of Bretton Woods.

The End of Dollar Hegemony Part 1

 

The End of Dollar Hegemony Part 2

 

The End of Dollar Hegemony Part 3

 

Via Nick Giambruno of Casey Research,

The speech is an absolute must-listen...

...

The most important part of the speech is where Paul discusses the petrodollar system, a primary factor in maintaining the dollar's role as the world's premier currency after the breakdown of Bretton Woods.

"It all ended on August 15, 1971, when Nixon closed the gold window and refused to pay out any of our remaining 280 million ounces of gold. In essence, we declared our insolvency and everyone recognized some other monetary system had to be devised in order to bring stability to the markets.

 

Amazingly, a new system was devised which allowed the US to operate the printing presses for the world reserve currency with no restraints placed on it—not even a pretense of gold convertibility, none whatsoever! Though the new policy was even more deeply flawed, it nevertheless opened the door for dollar hegemony to spread.

 

Realizing the world was embarking on something new and mind-boggling, elite money managers, with especially strong support from US authorities, struck an agreement with OPEC to price oil in US dollars exclusively for all worldwide transactions. This gave the dollar a special place among world currencies and in essence "backed" the dollar with oil. In return, the US promised to protect the various oil-rich kingdoms in the Persian Gulf against threat of invasion or domestic coup. This arrangement helped ignite the radical Islamic movement (Al Qaeda) among those who resented our influence in the region. The arrangement gave the dollar artificial strength, with tremendous financial benefits for the United States. It allowed us to export our monetary inflation by buying oil and other goods at a great discount as dollar influence flourished.

 

This post-Bretton Woods system was much more fragile than the system that existed between 1945 and 1971. Though the dollar/oil arrangement was helpful, it was not nearly as stable as the pseudo—gold standard under Bretton Woods. It certainly was less stable than the gold standard of the late 19th century.

 

The agreement with OPEC in the 1970s to price oil in dollars has provided tremendous artificial strength to the dollar as the preeminent reserve currency. This has created a universal demand for the dollar, and soaks up the huge number of new dollars generated each year.

Using force to compel people to accept money without real value can only work in the short run. It ultimately leads to economic dislocation, both domestic and international, and always ends with a price to be paid.

 

The economic law that honest exchange demands only things of real value as currency cannot be repealed. The chaos that one day will ensue from our 35-year experiment with worldwide fiat money will require a return to money of real value. We will know that day is approaching when oil-producing countries demand gold, or its equivalent, for their oil rather than dollars or euros. The sooner the better."

Ron Paul told me that although this speech is relatively unknown in the US, it was widely received around the world. As we discussed the implications of these issues, Paul said that the premise of this speech still applies today.

I believe that once the dollar loses its status as the world's premier reserve, the US will start to implement the destructive measures we frequently discuss: capital controls, people controls, price controls, currency devaluations, confiscations, nationalizing pensions, etc.

Such things have happened recently in Poland, Cyprus, Iceland, Argentina, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, and a number of other countries.

Take a glance at history and you will quickly notice these measures are the norm when a government gets into serious fiscal trouble. Many nations have made the mistake of thinking they were somehow "exceptional" and that these kinds of things couldn't happen to them.

There is no question the US is and will continue to be in serious fiscal trouble unless it implements drastic (and politically impossible) changes. The only saving grace for the US has been its ability to print the world's reserve currency. But once that special privilege is lost, it will revert to the measures all other governments throughout history have taken.

You absolutely want to be internationalized before the US dollar loses its status as the world's premier reserve currency. I truly believe the window opportunity to take protective action will slam shut at that time. You can find our specific guidance on how to do that here.

The Rise Of The C-Note "And" The Cashless Economy?

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 06:40 PM PDT

Even as Washington stares into a fiscal abyss of its own construction, there is one bright spot: the ongoing global popularity of the $100 bill. The U.S. Treasury/Federal Reserve launched their latest version of the venerable C-Note just this week, printing $350 billion worth over the last 12 months to meet anticipated robust worldwide demand. This came on the heels of the 2012FY, when the Treasury printed 3.0 billion such notes.

Given that $100 bills last about 15 years in circulation, ConvergEx's Nick Colas notes that these record amounts seem to indicate very strong worldwide demand for hard currency rather just replacing old stock. In the US, by contrast, the 'Cashless economy' is coming hard and fast.  Dollar bill production in 2013FY was just $1.8 billion, the lowest amount since 1980. The value of all currency printed, excluding $100 bills, was $27 billion – less than half the run rate of just a decade ago and the lowest since 1981.

 

Via ConvergEx's Nick Colas,

The ongoing news coverage about the U.S. debt limit and budget debates has crowded out some pretty juicy stories in the past week, such as the mysterious $27 billion cash hoard sitting in a Moscow airport warehouse.  According to the Russian tabloid press (so take this all with a grain of salt), it arrived six years ago in 200 pallets of plastic-wrapped cash, with no forwarding address.  Since then Russian authorities have kept the money under armed guard, waiting for someone to claim it.  Some say it belongs to a fallen Middle East dictator.  Others suspect it is Iranian oil money. 

The strangest bit of the story, true or not, is that that the cash is all in 100 euro notes.  It is theoretically possible for such a trove to exist, for the European Central Bank printed some 129 billion euros worth of these bills from 2002 to 2008.  If 16% of them are sitting in Moscow, that would be a large chunk of the outstanding, to be sure.  How one person or institution could amass so much of the relatively new currency without drawing attention is the real question.

That anecdote neatly explains why the U.S. $100 note is still the world's king of physical currency, rather than the euro.  Over the same seven-year period the U.S. Treasury printed $589 billion of C-notes, so anyone looking to store $27 billion in cash would need just 4.5% of the issuance to construct their nest egg.  And, of course, the U.S. government was printing $100 bills long before the euro was even a twinkle in Brussels' eye, so the supply is actually much larger than that. 

The fact that the U.S. Treasury just redesigned the $100 bill, launching the latest iteration today, should tell you that physical notes are still an important part of what makes the U.S. dollar a global "Reserve" currency.  The new notes have upgraded anti-counterfeiting measures such as three-dimensional ribbon imbedded in the bill and a color-changing bell in an inkwell.  Everyone from Hezbollah to North Korea has famously tried to counterfeit the U.S. $100 bill over the years, with varying levels of success.  The latest enhancements are merely the latest move in a long game of cat and mouse between forgers and the U.S. government.

What is more intriguing is the explosive increase in demand for $100 bills since the Financial Crisis.  Prior to 2007, the U.S. Treasury typically printed about 630 million C-notes (the average from 2001 – 2006).  From 2007 to the recent end of the 2013 government fiscal year, that average is 1,894 million, or three times the old run rate.  A few points here:

Most $100 notes go immediately overseas and stay there for their useful lives.

 

The Treasury estimates that a typical $100 bill lasts about 15 years, versus just 5 years or less for a $1 bill.  This is due to reduced handling.

 

The cost to produce a new $100 bill is about 13 cents, up modestly from the old note's cost of 8 cents.  

 

The production of $100 bills is therefore profitable enough to have a positive and noticeable impact on U.S. fiscal health.  Assuming that half of the average 1.9 billion note average issuance since 2007 was new demand rather than replacing used currency, the U.S. has netted $190 billion/year since the Financial Crisis from the $100 bill program.  

 

Even better, since the demand for C-Notes is non-U.S., these inflows are largely incremental to the domestic economy.  You think Apple or Google have a good business model?  The Treasury/Federal Reserve have them trumped.

Who uses the $100, and to what purpose?  That's where things get a little difficult.  It's not like this is an efficient way to move money around. One million dollars just about fits in a standard Halliburton 5" aluminum briefcase, but it weighs about 22 pounds.  The $100 bill is widely accepted, to be sure, but if you move around with more than a few million dollars you'd better have a bodyguard or five. 

A piece of the incremental demand over the last decade is obviously conflict-related.   When I travelled in Afghanistan earlier this year it was clear that the U.S. dollar was the preferred currency, and the whole place seems to run on wads of $100 bills.  As countries in the region – Syria, Libya, Lebanon, and Egypt, for example – go through political and economic upheaval, their demand for physical currency likely grows.  The dollar still has an edge over the euro here, if only because of its longer history.
 
Then there are the more obvious sources of demand: criminal enterprise and tax evasion.  Google the term "Drug bust" and you won't likely see bitcoin thumb drives or euros stacked up next to the illegal substances.  It will be stacks of $100 bills.  And our Russian airport stash notwithstanding, the dollar certainly has an edge in money laundering and "Wealth preservation" strategies.  Add to this the low rates of inflation in the U.S relative to many other countries, and you have a convenient (if bulky) store of value.

Back inside the U.S., however, paper currency is quickly sliding into the same history as electric typewriters and land line telephones.  We've got a lot of data on this in chart form after this note, but here are the highlights:

For the just-ended 2013 Fiscal Year, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (part of the Treasury), produced just 1.8 billion dollar bills.  That's the lowest production count on record since 1980 and a fraction of the 5 billion notes printed in 2000 and 2001 during the Y2K scare.  Even back during 2007 and 2008, the BEP was pumping out +4 billion bills a year.

 

The second most popular note – the $20 – is also way down in terms of production.  In 2013FY, the BEP produced 528 million such bills, down from +3 billion in 2005 and +4 billion in 1999.

 

The total value of non-$100 bill currencies printed in 2013FY was just $27.4 billion, the lowest amount since 1981.  For comparison, consider that in 2007 the BEP printed $72 billion in non-$100 currencies and even last year this number was $56 billion.

In summary, technology – debit cards, online bill paying, gift cards, etc – is quickly making physical currency a niche product rather than a mainstay of the domestic American economy.  The most profitable 'Niche' from an issuer's perspective is the high-denomination $100 bill, and this fits neatly with the needs of many people who want a reliable and physically compact currency – especially offshore.  For everyday transactions, the "Cashless economy" is clearly on its way.

Pierre Lassonde must not know the right central bankers

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 05:15 PM PDT

8:21a ChST Thursday, October 10, 2013

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Gold mining entrepreneur Pierre Lassonde, a former chairman of the World Gold Council, this week told MineWeb's Geoff Candy that central bankers hardly ever think about gold, much less think about the manipulation of its price.

"When I was chairman of the World Gold Council," Lassonde says, "one of my goals was to get closer to the central bankers and I tried to understand what goes on in their heads and try to help them with the management of their gold reserves, or their lack of reserves. ... I made many trips to China, to Beijing, to talk to the chief central banker there. ... Ninety-nine point nine percent of the central bankers I know don't even know they have gold in their vault. They don't spend one millisecond thinking about gold during the day. It's not on their agenda, so to think that they try to manipulate gold to suppress the gold price -- forget it. They don't even think about it."

MineWeb's interview with Lassonde is here:

http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/content/en/mineweb-gold-analysis?oid=2081...

Of course maybe the central bankers known to Lassonde are not the ones known to staff members of the International Monetary Fund, who surveyed central bankers in 1999 and, in a secret report to the IMF board, reported that the central bankers were desperate to conceal their gold swaps and leases lest transparency about their gold reserves impair their surreptitious interventions in the gold and currency markets:

http://www.gata.org/node/12016

Meanwhile this week fund manager and geopolitical strategist James G. Rickards, author of the recent book "Currency Wars," who has held U.S. government security clearance, told the Canadian Broadcasting Corp.'s "The Lang and O'Leary Exchange" program that central bankers do think very much about gold. Rickards said "fine art" is a good investment these days because it "behaves the way gold would behave if central banks didn't intervene, because central banks don't care about fine art." The interview with Rickards is six minutes long and is posted at the CBC Internet site here:

http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/Business/Lang+%26+O%27Leary+Exchange/ID/24...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Buy metals at GoldMoney and enjoy international storage

GoldMoney was established in 2001 by James and Geoff Turk and is safeguarding more than $1.7 billion in metals and currencies. Buy gold, silver, platinum, and palladium from GoldMoney over the Internet and store them in vaults in Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, ­taking advantage of GoldMoney's low storage rates, among the most competitive in the industry. GoldMoney also offers delivery of 100-gram and 1-kilogram gold bars and 1-kilogram silver bars. To learn more, please visit:

http://www.goldmoney.com/?gmrefcode=gata



Join GATA here:

Louis Boulanger Now Seminar
Visitors Center, Holy Trinity Parnell
Auckland, New Zeland
Sunday, October 13, 2013

http://www.gata.org/files/GATAInNewZealand.pdf

Gold Investment Symposium 2013
Luna Park Conference Center, Sydney, Australia
Wednesday-Thursday, October 16-17, 2013

http://gold.symposium.net.au/

The Silver Summit
Davenport Hotel, Spokane, Washington
Thursday-Friday, October 24-25, 2013

http://www.cambridgehouse.com/event/silver-summit-2013

Mines and Money Australia
Melbourne Conference and Exhibition Centre
Tuesday, October 29-Friday, November 1, 2013

http://www.minesandmoney.com/

New Orleans Investment Conference
Sunday-Wednesday, November 10-13, 2013
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
New Orleans, Louisiana

https://jeffersoncompanies.com/landing/speakers?IDPromotion=613011610080...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing DVDs of our London conference in August 2011 or our Dawson City conference in August 2006:

http://www.goldrush21.com/order.html

Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

How to profit with silver --
and which stocks to buy now

Future Money Trends is offering a special 16-page silver report with our forecast for 2013 that includes profiles of nine companies and technical analysis of their stock performance. Six of the companies have market capitalizations of less than $800 million and one company has a market cap of only $30 million. The most exciting of these companies will begin production in a few weeks and has a market cap of just $150 million.

Half of all proceeds from the sale of this report will be donated to the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee to support its efforts exposing manipulation and fraud in the gold and silver markets.

To learn about this report, please visit:

http://www.futuremoneytrends.com/index.php?option=com_content&id=376&tmp...


Kyle Bass Warns "There Is No Way To Protect Yourself If US Treasuries Default"

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 04:54 PM PDT

"If the politicians lead us into a 'prioritization of payments' situation for Treasury Secretary Lew or an actual missed payment, there is nothing you can do to protect yourself from that!" are the ominous words that Kyle Bass uses to describe the farce that is rapidly approaching (and for now being ignored by stocks). Bass went on to pull no punches in his "disappointment" in JCPenney's performance (and dilution) coming as close as he can to saying "sell." But his piece de resistance was a dismal destruction of any silver lining for Puerto Rico and the significant implications that will have on Muni bonds in general.

 

On Default risk and "Un-hedgeable" implications:

 

On JCPenney - "Disappointed" - "didn't belive they needed to raise the capital... and now they have diluted us over 30%"

 

On Puerto Rico and the threat to the entire Muni market - "you look at their finances and you can only say - I have no clue how this can exist for very much longer"

Obamacare: I’ve Started So I’ll Finish

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 04:24 PM PDT

There are people that are like magnates when it comes to raking in the millions and there are some that have an even stronger pull than usual where finances are concerned. As Warren Buffet openly states that he believes that a default on US debt will be catastrophic and that lawmakers in Congress need to get their act together and get the federal government back to work by passing the budget we might well wonder if it's just for show or if he really believes that. Why would someone who made $10 billion out of the lifelines that he threw to the failing companies after the financial crisis of 2008 want to forego making even more than that this time round?

Buffet on Shutdown

Warren Buffet has recently asked the politicians of the US to stop using the debt limit as some sort of weapon to win the policy debates. But, we had better hope that he's not talking about weapons of mass destruction (as they never existed the last time that word was banded about in the country).

We should be asking though whether Buffet is really eyeing the best interests of the country. The man made $10 billion out of the loans that were granted to failing companies and banks five years ago. Yes, he had the money to shore them up then and no money lender is philanthropic enough to do it for free of charge and with no interest; but we should wonder if he will be "fearful when others are greedy or greedy when others are fearful" (to quote his favorite saying) this time around.

Through Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Buffet has so far made $10 billion and he still hasn't got the entire return on his investments back. Maybe he'll be using the money he has made when the stock market drops this time round. He might even turn out to be the lender of last resort for the US administration. Who knows?

  • Buffet lent $4.4 billion to Mars Inc's subsidiary Wrigley in 2008.
  • Berkshire bought up $2.1-billion worth of shares in Goldman Sach's in 2008 and invested a further $5 billion.
  • Dow Chemical borrowed $3 billion in 2009.
  • The Bank of America got $5 billion in 2011.
  • Overall Berkshire invested $26 billion.

National Debt

When Lehman Brothers collapsed it brought the stock market to its knees and the market lost 50% of its value in the aftermath. Then we were only talking about a measly $517 billion for Lehman. The US has $12 trillion in debt that is outstanding. Even when we are told that the Chinese and the Japanese own the US debt the answer comes back from some that it doesn't matter. There are some that are even under the delusion that it's acceptable to have so much debt in the US since Japan is in a worse state of affairs. Japan may have almost double the national debt of the US in terms of a percentage of Gross Domestic Product, but that doesn't make things any better for the US to carry on willy-nilly with the frenzied spending and it certainly doesn't mean that they can go on spending as they have done in the past. Is it because the guy round the corner does it that I can do it. Stop looking over the garden fence Uncle Sam and start looking in your own back yard.

  • China has a national debt of $2, 403, 410 150, 771 and that debt stands at 40.36% of GDP.
  • Japan has a national debt of $11, 266, 212, 135, 309 and debt that equals 193.41% of GDP.
  • The USA has a national debt of $17, 265, 489, 323, 435 and that equals 107.88% of GDP.

At least that was how things stood today when the national debt clocks were checked. That's already out of date right now, however. It was old news as soon as it was written.

Sometimes we might wonder whether it would actually be better for the whole world to collapse and those that believe that there needs to be a rethink of how the economies of the world actually act and react together.

Some believe that it might be a good think for there to be an implosion that will bring the banks down, kill off the money-makers and the buck reapers and get rid of those that started the printing presses rolling the greenbacks out.

Granted, we all might go under but we could all start from scratch in a brand new world and just probably end up doing the self-same thing since we never learn from our mistakes. It will never happen, but a few might get hurt along the way as we enter day 9 of the shutdown and the debt ceiling deadline is just a week away.

Come on policymakers, carry on and keep knocking of 0.5% from the growth rate of the USA and spiral us into not just recession, but depression. We will need to invent a new word for the effects on the world and that word might well beObamacaression that will be on the tips of the tongues of the American people. That's where it all stemmed from. They voted a man into office so the ideal that all Americans might have healthcare coverage one day could see the light of day in a new world that then changed tack when the chips were down and went on to believe that meritocracy should be the order of the day.

Obamacare was the ideal that was the start of all of this and Obamacare will be the caress of death of the US.Obamacaression. It was the start of this and it will be the finish of it too. The US may not default, but it will do a damn good job of destroying what has been built up over the past five years. Obamacare: I've started so I'll finish. You don't have to be Mastermind to know what will happen next.

Maybe that's not such a bad idea. We need to restructure the way the economies work, don't we?

Originally posted: Obamacare: I've Started So I'll Finish

You might also enjoy: USA: Uncle Sam is Dead

 Where Washington Should Go for Money: Havens | Sugar Rush is on | Human Capital: Switzerland or Yemen? | Wonderful President of USA and Munchkins | Last One to Leave Turn Out the Lights | Crisis is Literal Kiss of Death | Qatar's Slave Trade Death Toll | Lew's Illusions | Wal-Mart: Unpatriotic or Lying Through Their Teeth? Food: Walking the Breadline | Obama NOT Worst President in reply to Obama: Worst President in US History? | Obama's Corporate Grand Bargain Death of the Dollar | Joseph Stiglitz was Right: Suicide | China Injects Cash in Bid to Improve Liquidity

Technical Analysis: Bear Expanding Triangle | Bull Expanding Triangle | Bull Falling Wedge Bear Rising Wedge High & Tight Flag

 

 

The Bullion Market's Big Issues, Part I

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 02:48 PM PDT

Price action isn't the big players' big concern in gold and silver right now. "Faith and Religion," said Edel Tully of UBS, the Swiss investment and bullion bank. "Those were key themes," she said, summing up this year's LBMA ... Read More...

Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Who Wouldn’t! Here’s How

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 01:43 PM PDT

So writes Gina Monaco (loop.ca) in edited excerpts from her original article* entitled Money lessons from the rich.

The following is presented by Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com and www.munKNEE.com and the FREE Market Intelligence Report newsletter (sample here – register here). The excerpts may have been edited ([ ]), abridged (…) and/or reformatted (some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. This paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.

Monaco goes on to say in further edited excerpts:

In a study commissioned by BMO, almost half of Canada's millionaires are new immigrants or first generation Canadians and two-thirds of them were self-made, with only 20 per cent getting a part of their wealth from an inheritance. That gives the rest of us some hope.

1. Keep learning

Keep investing in your education, even if you have a degree. Read success books and attend motivational and other seminars to keep your momentum going. Try reading biographies of successful people – even millionaire Donald Trump! The more you read about the path to success of others, the more motivated you will be to pursue your own dreams.

2. Discipline yourself

Don't spend money on luxury items you can't afford. If you want to earn yourself into a millionaire then you need to live a disciplined life. Think Zen!

3. Follow your bliss

Do what you love and the money will follow. I know, it might sound corny, but if you're doing what you love, whether it's your job or hobby or side business, means you will stick it out during the ups and downs [and have a much greater chance of becoming a millionaire]. Again, think Zen!

4. Save, save, save

Did I mention save? To live within your means is the hardest thing to do in a society of instant gratification. You have to move beyond the paycheque to paycheque mentality. Millionaires pay themselves first.

5. Reduce personal debts

All debt is bad, but some debt is not as bad as others. Mortgages, business loans and student loans are not so bad but high-interest credit cards and lines of credit will stand in your way to becoming a millionaire. Pay them off.

6. Invest

Financial markets yield good returns whether you're a conservative or an aggressive investor. Long-term investing usually yields better returns and is less risky than short-term investing. Start with companies you know…. like banks, yeah banks!

7. Invest long-term money

Only invest what you can afford to lose. Don't use the money you need for your day-to-day living. How to free up cash? See items four and five – pay off debts and save. Don't incur debt by using your credit facilities to invest.

8. Own your home

A person's home is their castle – and it can be as valuable as one. Homes appreciate in value over time and are a good investment. According to MSN Money Central, 95 percent of all millionaires own a home.

9. Open a retirement savings account

As soon as possible – the earlier the better! Retirement accounts use compound interest, which means you continually earn interest on your interest. The earlier you start contributing to your retirement account, the more money you can accumulate because you have more time to take advantage of compound interest. [It makes becoming a millionaire that much easier.]

10. Don't put all your eggs in one basket

Millionaires believe in diversification, meaning multiple streams of income so read up and learn the many ways you can diversify your millionaire portfolio.

[Editor's Note: The author's views and conclusions in the above article are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original post. Furthermore, the views, conclusions and any recommendations offered in this article are not to be construed as an endorsement of such by the editor.]

*http://www.theloop.ca/living/money/the-next-step/photo-gallery/-/p/6641/Money-lessons-from-the-rich/2545945 (© Bell Media 2013 All rights reserved)

Related Articles:

1. Are You a Millionaire? 10 Reasons You May Not Be and What to do About It

The reason you are not a millionaire (or even on your way to becoming one) is really quite simple. You probably assume it's because you aren't earning enough money but the truth is that, for most people, it does not matter how much money you make… [but, rather,] the way you treat money in your daily life. [Let me explain.] Words: 866

2. More Reasons You May Not be a Millionaire – Yet

Many people assume they aren't rich because they don't earn enough money. If I only earned a little more, I could save and invest better, they say. The problem with that theory is they were probably making exactly the same argument before their last several raises. Becoming a millionaire has less to do with how much you make, it's how you treat money in your daily life. The list of reasons you may not be rich doesn't end at 10. [Here are 10 more.] Words: 842

3. Do You Have What It Takes to Become Filthy Rich?

Saving money isn't all about whether or not you know how to score screaming bargains. It has more to do with your attitude toward money. Many millionaires, in fact, have frugal ways and understanding how personal traits can influence your finances is an essential ingredient for building wealth. Do you have the 10 key traits to become rich let alone very, very rich? Words: 815

4. Manage Your Money Without Breaking A Sweat – Here's How

If you want more free time, or are just plain lazy, here are some easy ways to manage your money. I promise you won't break into a sweat… Read More »

5. 10 Money Ideas That WILL Change Your Life

Personal finance isn't nuclear physics – just spend less than you earn, save and invest the rest – but knowing what should be done and actually doing it, however, are two different things. Here are 10 money lessons I wish I had known when I was 20 which have the power to change your life if you are willing to embrace them. Words: 1340

6. American Grads: Here's a Great Guide to Personal Finance

Graduating from college can be an exciting and stressful time. Suddenly you need to find a job, replay loans and make solid financial decisions. Fortunately, you don't need to be unprepared. Below are some budgeting basics to keep your spending under control, some suggestions on how to set financial goals and a list of the top 10 American cities for starting out.

7.  "Put More Cash in Your Wallet: Turn What You Know into Dough" – A Book by Loral Langemeier

You too can live comfortably and buy the things you want without worrying about how to stretch your income even further — you can even pay off your old bills in the process! Get out there and start making money! Words: 911

8. Here's the Smart (Easy) Way to Profit from a "Gold Party"

Have you ever wanted to host a gold party but didn't know how to get started? Wondered who to call or even how much money you could make?…[We] make the process very simple for you and alleviate the costs of hosting traditional gold parties Read More »

9. 2% of U.S. Households Earn $450,000/yr. or More; 50% Earn $43,000 on Average – Exactly Where Does Your Income Put YOU?

Visit wsj.com – HERE – to find their calculator which shows where your household income stands compared to others in the U.S.. $506,000 puts you in the top 1%; the much talked about $250,00 in the top 6%; $200,000 in the top 10% while an annual salary of $43,000 puts you in the top/bottom 50%. Where do you stand?

The post Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Who Wouldn't! Here’s How appeared first on munKNEE dot.com.

Why I Am A Terrified As I Watch The End Game Unfolding

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 01:31 PM PDT

As the modern world seems to move directly from one crisis to another, today one of the wealthiest people in the financial world spoke with King World News about why he told KWN very recently, "I am a terrified observer as I watch the end game drawing to a close." Rick Rule, who is business partners with billionaire Eric Sprott, also warned that Western central planners may not be able to halt a 2008-style collapse a second time around. Below is what he had to say in this candid and powerful interview.

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Gold Daily and Silver Weekly Charts - G20 Central Bank/Finance Meeting in Washington Tomorrow

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 01:25 PM PDT

Gold Daily and Silver Weekly Charts - G20 Central Bank/Finance Meeting in Washington Tomorrow

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 01:25 PM PDT

Figures Don’t Lie, but Liars Figure

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 12:35 PM PDT

Gold took quite a beating in September, bucking its seasonal average monthly return of 2.3%. The political battle between President Barack Obama and Congress, China's Golden Week, and India's gold import restrictions likely weighed on the metal.Picture 1

September's correction only adds to the negative sentiment toward the precious metal. The assumption from many market pundits is that gold is no longer attractive as an investment. With rising rates and continuing low inflation, U.S. investors believe they have a solid case for selling their holdings.

However, this could be a premature assessment, causing these bears to potentially lose out on a lucrative position.

Allow me to use an ice cube to explain.

One of the strongest drivers of the "fear trade" is real interest rates. Whenever a country has negative-to-low real rates of return, which means the inflationary rate (CPI) is greater than the current interest rate, gold tends to rise in that country's currency. And our model tells us that the tipping point for gold is when real interest rates go above the 2-percent mark.

Consider the ice cube, which shows how new equilibriums can have significant effects. At 31 degrees, H2O is a solid chunk, but when the temperature increases, the mass slowly begins to turn into a liquid. Above 32 degrees, ice changes form from solid to liquid, but it's still made of hydrogen and oxygen.

Because money is like water, when many other economic dynamics, such as population growth, urbanization rates and changes in government policies, reach their tipping point, the velocity of money tends to be altered.

As global investors, we watch for changes in these trends to know how to invest in commodities and markets, find new opportunities and adjust for risk.

So, how close to gold's tipping point are we? In other words, what is the real interest rate today? As you can see below, Treasury investors continue to lose money, as the 5-year bill yields 1.41 percent and inflation sits at 1.5 percent. This is nowhere near the 2 percent mark.

picture 2

I would be worried about gold if real interest rates solidly crossed the 2 percent threshold for an extended amount of time, because it would have a dramatic effect on gold as an asset class. In a high interest rate environment, gold and silver lose their attraction as a store of value.

In order for that tipping point to happen, rates would need to continue rising above inflation, and inflation would need to remain low. These are the forecasts made by many gold sellers today; however I wouldn't get too trigger happy just yet, as recent data challenges these assumptions.

Take the monthly unemployment figure, which is one of the primary indicators the Federal Reserve studies when evaluating the economy. But depending on the definition of an unemployed person, the numbers reveal different results.

The official U3 unemployment rate, the exact figure Ben Bernanke uses, tracks the total unemployed as a percent of the civilian labor force.

The broadest gauge calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is the U6 unemployment rate. For this number, the BLS adds in all those people who are marginally attached to the labor force, plus people working part-time but want to work full-time.

What does "marginally attached to the labor force" mean? These people are neither working nor looking for work but indicate they want a job, are available to work and have worked during some period in the last 12 months. These marginally attached people also include discouraged workers who are not looking for work because of some job-market related reason.

Then there's a measure of the labor market the BLS tracked prior to 1994. This is the seasonally-adjusted alternate unemployment rate that statistician John Williams continued to calculate. It's basically the U6 plus long-term discouraged workers.

While the figures closely followed one another from 1994 through 2009, there's recently been a shift. U3 and U6 have been trending downward over the past few years, whereas Williams' ShadowStats unemployment rate shows a noticeably upward trajectory. Perhaps the official unemployment figure overstates the health of the economy?

Monthly seasonal-adjusted rate through August 2013

Based on the jobs market, a limited housing recovery and regulations that have been slowing down the flow of money, the Fed may have no choice but to raise rates very gradually to keep stimulating the economy.

Then there's the suggestion of inflation manipulation. Even though the U.S. has been reporting a low inflation number, things feel more expensive to many Americans. Disposable income has been growing less than inflation in recent years; perhaps that's why many people feel "squeezed."

Also consider Williams' chart below. It shows monthly inflation data going back for more than a century. The blue and grey shaded areas represent BLS' historical Consumer Price Index (CPI). You can clearly see the wild swings of inflation and deflation, especially during World War I, the Great Depression, and World War II, as well as the stagflation of the 1970s and early 1980s.

However, shortly after disco, bell bottoms, and episodes of "All in the Family" faded from memory, the U.S. adjusted CPI, not once but twice, first in the early 1980s and again in the mid-1990s. If you use the pre-1982 calculation, you end up with a much different inflation picture. This is the area shaded in red.

Monthly inflation from 1872 to present

Way back in 1889, statistician Carroll D. Wright, in addressing the Convention of Commissioners of Bureaus of Statistics of Labor, talked about the impartial and fearless presentation of its data, using the above play on words. He said:

"The old saying is that 'figures will not lie,' but a new saying is 'liars will figure.' It is our duty, as practical statisticians, to prevent the liar from figuring; in other words, to prevent him from preverting the truth, in the interest of some theory he wishes to establish."

Wright's speech seems particularly relevant today.

For patient, long-term investors looking for a great portfolio diversifier, a moderate weighting in gold and gold stocks may be just the answer. And, today, when looking across the gold mining industry, you'll find plenty of companies that have paid attractive dividends, many higher than the 5-year government yield.

Regards,

Frank Holmes
for

Gold, Trust & Independence, Part I

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 12:26 PM PDT

Why do central banks hold gold? Because of the trust and independence it provides...
 
"FAITH and RELIGION," said Edel Tully of UBS, the Swiss investment and bullion bank.
 
"Those were key themes," she said, summing up this year's LBMA conference last Tuesday evening, writes Adrian Ash at BullionVault.
 
We could hardly ignore those issues, meeting in the hills just west of Rome with 700 other delegates for the London Bullion Market Association's annual jolly. From Monday night's dinner on top of Monte Mario, the dome of St.Peter's dominated the view. And any asset which doesn't pay an income, and which has fallen in price for more than two years, must look like a "hold-n-hope" investment based more on prayer than cold logic.
 
Instead of "faith and religion" however, we had already scribbled down "trust and independence" as the LBMA conference's key themes. Because where Dr.Tully heard whispers of eternal beliefs – here in God (or gods), there in gold – we nearly had to cover our ears from all-too worldly shouting over safety and sovereignty, confidence and freedom.
 
Gold forms a triangle with these ideas throughout history. Trust and independence met gold again last week in Rome. Because today's oh-so-modern mob of taxpayers, government officials, lenders, traders, high priests and the rest still need to trust each other but also demand independence as they skip through the forum. And as the oh-so-sociable LBMA conference showed, the way that gold and silver are treated speaks to people's trust in each other, and their freedom to act as they choose.
 
Take central bankers. They tend to sell gold when it's cheap, and buy or hold when it's not. "This," as Blackrock's Terence Keeley rightly noted to the LBMA conference, "is no way to diversify your portfolio."
But central-bank gold is about much more than smoothing returns or improving your efficient frontier. It's about independence, even if that independence puts the central bank's trust in other institutions in doubt. Institutions such as, say, the monetary union you're publicly working to deepen and develop.
 
Not that any of the six current or former central bankers addressing the LBMA conference last week dared say any such thing. Nothing too blatant was given away. But you didn't need rolling translation to hear what was said.
 
"Trust is a central bank's most valuable asset," announced keynote speaker Salvatore Rossi of the Banca d'Italia. Only just behind that, he seemed to suggest, gold came a close second. And given Italy's recent history with gold, it certainly seems to support the central bank's trust amongst the general public. Because as Rossi said, gold so plainly supports the bank's independence from government.
 
"I don't need to remind you of gold's unique role in central bank reserves," said Rossi, nevertheless reminding the 700-odd delegates to the LBMA's two-day meeting in Rome that gold is "unique amongst risk assets" because it is not "issued" by anyone. So it carries no liability and needs no counterparty for its inherent value.
 
Just as importantly, the central bank of Italy's director general also pointed to "psychological reasons" for gold's key role. So did Clemens Werner of the Bundesbank, the world's second-heaviest gold owner behind the United States. More than 40 years after the final gasp of the Gold Standard and eight decades after that monetary system really hit the skids, he named "confidence" and "precaution" as the big reasons for continuing to hold gold.
 
Because as Italy's Rossi went on in his speech, gold "enhances resilience" in the central bank's reserves overall, typically rising when other risk assets plunge. More notably, gold "underpins the independence of the central bank" from government. Quite how, Rossi didn't say. But with Silvio Berlusconi trying to destroy Italy's government just a few minutes cab-ride away, the point was plain enough if you knew the history.
 
Il Cavaliere came after the Banca d'Italia's gold in 2009. He was told where to go. The central bank's big friends at the European Central Bank then told Berlusconi where to go, too. Trying to tax the central bank's unrealized profits on gold was illegal under the Euro treaty, breaching line after line of the critical "independence" from government which national central banks must retain. Italian central-bank governor Mario Draghi has since moved into the job of ECB chief. So his stand against Berlusconi's failed gold bullion tax grab looks a good template for how the ECB, and the biggest gold-owning central banks of the Eurosystem, might view their gold reserves today.
 
Most definitely, none of Germany or Italy's gold is up for sale this year. Alexandre Gautier said the same of France's hoard. But then again, the Banque de France said that in the late 1990s, only to break ranks and take advantage of rising prices in the early Noughties. Gautier also spoke last week about trading and lending (this was a business conference, after all), but only to say the former is now very limited, while the latter is off the table. Not until gold borrowers come up with collateral. Which is unlikely but necessary now that – compared with 10 or 15 years ago, when lending European central-bank gold was all the rage (as was selling it, at least outside Rome and Frankfurt) – "the environment is totally different. I'm not sure it could be acceptable for a 1-year loan without collateral."
 
Which brings us back to trust...to be continued in Part II

Gold, Trust & Independence, Part I

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 12:26 PM PDT

Why do central banks hold gold? Because of the trust and independence it provides...
 
"FAITH and RELIGION," said Edel Tully of UBS, the Swiss investment and bullion bank.
 
"Those were key themes," she said, summing up this year's LBMA conference last Tuesday evening, writes Adrian Ash at BullionVault.
 
We could hardly ignore those issues, meeting in the hills just west of Rome with 700 other delegates for the London Bullion Market Association's annual jolly. From Monday night's dinner on top of Monte Mario, the dome of St.Peter's dominated the view. And any asset which doesn't pay an income, and which has fallen in price for more than two years, must look like a "hold-n-hope" investment based more on prayer than cold logic.
 
Instead of "faith and religion" however, we had already scribbled down "trust and independence" as the LBMA conference's key themes. Because where Dr.Tully heard whispers of eternal beliefs – here in God (or gods), there in gold – we nearly had to cover our ears from all-too worldly shouting over safety and sovereignty, confidence and freedom.
 
Gold forms a triangle with these ideas throughout history. Trust and independence met gold again last week in Rome. Because today's oh-so-modern mob of taxpayers, government officials, lenders, traders, high priests and the rest still need to trust each other but also demand independence as they skip through the forum. And as the oh-so-sociable LBMA conference showed, the way that gold and silver are treated speaks to people's trust in each other, and their freedom to act as they choose.
 
Take central bankers. They tend to sell gold when it's cheap, and buy or hold when it's not. "This," as Blackrock's Terence Keeley rightly noted to the LBMA conference, "is no way to diversify your portfolio."
But central-bank gold is about much more than smoothing returns or improving your efficient frontier. It's about independence, even if that independence puts the central bank's trust in other institutions in doubt. Institutions such as, say, the monetary union you're publicly working to deepen and develop.
 
Not that any of the six current or former central bankers addressing the LBMA conference last week dared say any such thing. Nothing too blatant was given away. But you didn't need rolling translation to hear what was said.
 
"Trust is a central bank's most valuable asset," announced keynote speaker Salvatore Rossi of the Banca d'Italia. Only just behind that, he seemed to suggest, gold came a close second. And given Italy's recent history with gold, it certainly seems to support the central bank's trust amongst the general public. Because as Rossi said, gold so plainly supports the bank's independence from government.
 
"I don't need to remind you of gold's unique role in central bank reserves," said Rossi, nevertheless reminding the 700-odd delegates to the LBMA's two-day meeting in Rome that gold is "unique amongst risk assets" because it is not "issued" by anyone. So it carries no liability and needs no counterparty for its inherent value.
 
Just as importantly, the central bank of Italy's director general also pointed to "psychological reasons" for gold's key role. So did Clemens Werner of the Bundesbank, the world's second-heaviest gold owner behind the United States. More than 40 years after the final gasp of the Gold Standard and eight decades after that monetary system really hit the skids, he named "confidence" and "precaution" as the big reasons for continuing to hold gold.
 
Because as Italy's Rossi went on in his speech, gold "enhances resilience" in the central bank's reserves overall, typically rising when other risk assets plunge. More notably, gold "underpins the independence of the central bank" from government. Quite how, Rossi didn't say. But with Silvio Berlusconi trying to destroy Italy's government just a few minutes cab-ride away, the point was plain enough if you knew the history.
 
Il Cavaliere came after the Banca d'Italia's gold in 2009. He was told where to go. The central bank's big friends at the European Central Bank then told Berlusconi where to go, too. Trying to tax the central bank's unrealized profits on gold was illegal under the Euro treaty, breaching line after line of the critical "independence" from government which national central banks must retain. Italian central-bank governor Mario Draghi has since moved into the job of ECB chief. So his stand against Berlusconi's failed gold bullion tax grab looks a good template for how the ECB, and the biggest gold-owning central banks of the Eurosystem, might view their gold reserves today.
 
Most definitely, none of Germany or Italy's gold is up for sale this year. Alexandre Gautier said the same of France's hoard. But then again, the Banque de France said that in the late 1990s, only to break ranks and take advantage of rising prices in the early Noughties. Gautier also spoke last week about trading and lending (this was a business conference, after all), but only to say the former is now very limited, while the latter is off the table. Not until gold borrowers come up with collateral. Which is unlikely but necessary now that – compared with 10 or 15 years ago, when lending European central-bank gold was all the rage (as was selling it, at least outside Rome and Frankfurt) – "the environment is totally different. I'm not sure it could be acceptable for a 1-year loan without collateral."
 
Which brings us back to trust...to be continued in Part II

Gold, Trust & Independence, Part I

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 12:26 PM PDT

Why do central banks hold gold? Because of the trust and independence it provides...
 
"FAITH and RELIGION," said Edel Tully of UBS, the Swiss investment and bullion bank.
 
"Those were key themes," she said, summing up this year's LBMA conference last Tuesday evening, writes Adrian Ash at BullionVault.
 
We could hardly ignore those issues, meeting in the hills just west of Rome with 700 other delegates for the London Bullion Market Association's annual jolly. From Monday night's dinner on top of Monte Mario, the dome of St.Peter's dominated the view. And any asset which doesn't pay an income, and which has fallen in price for more than two years, must look like a "hold-n-hope" investment based more on prayer than cold logic.
 
Instead of "faith and religion" however, we had already scribbled down "trust and independence" as the LBMA conference's key themes. Because where Dr.Tully heard whispers of eternal beliefs – here in God (or gods), there in gold – we nearly had to cover our ears from all-too worldly shouting over safety and sovereignty, confidence and freedom.
 
Gold forms a triangle with these ideas throughout history. Trust and independence met gold again last week in Rome. Because today's oh-so-modern mob of taxpayers, government officials, lenders, traders, high priests and the rest still need to trust each other but also demand independence as they skip through the forum. And as the oh-so-sociable LBMA conference showed, the way that gold and silver are treated speaks to people's trust in each other, and their freedom to act as they choose.
 
Take central bankers. They tend to sell gold when it's cheap, and buy or hold when it's not. "This," as Blackrock's Terence Keeley rightly noted to the LBMA conference, "is no way to diversify your portfolio."
But central-bank gold is about much more than smoothing returns or improving your efficient frontier. It's about independence, even if that independence puts the central bank's trust in other institutions in doubt. Institutions such as, say, the monetary union you're publicly working to deepen and develop.
 
Not that any of the six current or former central bankers addressing the LBMA conference last week dared say any such thing. Nothing too blatant was given away. But you didn't need rolling translation to hear what was said.
 
"Trust is a central bank's most valuable asset," announced keynote speaker Salvatore Rossi of the Banca d'Italia. Only just behind that, he seemed to suggest, gold came a close second. And given Italy's recent history with gold, it certainly seems to support the central bank's trust amongst the general public. Because as Rossi said, gold so plainly supports the bank's independence from government.
 
"I don't need to remind you of gold's unique role in central bank reserves," said Rossi, nevertheless reminding the 700-odd delegates to the LBMA's two-day meeting in Rome that gold is "unique amongst risk assets" because it is not "issued" by anyone. So it carries no liability and needs no counterparty for its inherent value.
 
Just as importantly, the central bank of Italy's director general also pointed to "psychological reasons" for gold's key role. So did Clemens Werner of the Bundesbank, the world's second-heaviest gold owner behind the United States. More than 40 years after the final gasp of the Gold Standard and eight decades after that monetary system really hit the skids, he named "confidence" and "precaution" as the big reasons for continuing to hold gold.
 
Because as Italy's Rossi went on in his speech, gold "enhances resilience" in the central bank's reserves overall, typically rising when other risk assets plunge. More notably, gold "underpins the independence of the central bank" from government. Quite how, Rossi didn't say. But with Silvio Berlusconi trying to destroy Italy's government just a few minutes cab-ride away, the point was plain enough if you knew the history.
 
Il Cavaliere came after the Banca d'Italia's gold in 2009. He was told where to go. The central bank's big friends at the European Central Bank then told Berlusconi where to go, too. Trying to tax the central bank's unrealized profits on gold was illegal under the Euro treaty, breaching line after line of the critical "independence" from government which national central banks must retain. Italian central-bank governor Mario Draghi has since moved into the job of ECB chief. So his stand against Berlusconi's failed gold bullion tax grab looks a good template for how the ECB, and the biggest gold-owning central banks of the Eurosystem, might view their gold reserves today.
 
Most definitely, none of Germany or Italy's gold is up for sale this year. Alexandre Gautier said the same of France's hoard. But then again, the Banque de France said that in the late 1990s, only to break ranks and take advantage of rising prices in the early Noughties. Gautier also spoke last week about trading and lending (this was a business conference, after all), but only to say the former is now very limited, while the latter is off the table. Not until gold borrowers come up with collateral. Which is unlikely but necessary now that – compared with 10 or 15 years ago, when lending European central-bank gold was all the rage (as was selling it, at least outside Rome and Frankfurt) – "the environment is totally different. I'm not sure it could be acceptable for a 1-year loan without collateral."
 
Which brings us back to trust...to be continued in Part II

Gold Drops Most in a Week as Stronger Dollar Damps Metal Demand

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 09:34 AM PDT

09-Oct (Bloomberg) — Gold fell the most in a week after the dollar extended gains and as imports slumped in India, the world's biggest consumer.

The Bloomberg U.S. Dollar Index, a gauge against 10 major trading partners, rose to a one-week high, curbing demand for the precious metal as an alternative asset. Purchases of gold and silver by India were worth $800 million in September compared with $4.6 billion a year earlier, the Commerce Ministry said today.

"The dollar is the winner today," Phil Streible, a senior commodity broker at R.J. O'Brien & Associates in Chicago, said in a telephone interview. "Prices are under pressure as physical demand has taken a hit."

[source]

The Daily Market Report

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 09:28 AM PDT

Gold Falls as One Point of Uncertainty Resolved


09-Oct (USAGOLD) — Gold has come under renewed pressure as the news broke late yesterday that Fed vice-chair Janet Yellen would be nominated to succeed Ben Bernanke as chairman of the Federal Reserve. She is widely expected to be confirmed. The dollar and global stocks firmed as at least one point of uncertainty in the U.S. seems to have been resolved.

The dollar index popped to a two week high and remains fairly well bid at this point, which is keeping the yellow metal under pressure. However, the equity rally has fizzled and U.S. stocks are in negative territory as investors continue to fret over the government shutdown and risks associated with a potential sovereign default. Those two factors should continue to provide some underpinnings to the gold market as well as we continue to tick ever-closer to the point where the federal government can no longer borrow.

Already there is much speculation about actions Bernanke might take on his way out the door, and actions Yellen might take on her way in. Most of that speculation centers on tapering. Suffice to say though that Yellen is every-bit as dovish as Bernanke and perhaps even more so; more aligned with noted doves Evans, Dudley and Rosengren.

Jim Rickards of Tangent Capital Partners and the best selling author of Currency Wars tweeted this today:

Don’t believe the hype that Yellen’s same as Bernanke. We had QE1 QE2 & QE3 because Ben’s a cautious “stop-go” guy. Yellen is all “go.”

Chicago Fed President Charles Evans spoke today at an IMF panel discussion and said that continued accommodative policy is necessary given the high jobless rate and low inflation. He noted that the U.S. has faced fiscal headwinds for several years and the current situation — presumably referring to the government shutdown and debt ceiling debate — “gives me great pause in looking at things.”

I’m sure this whole fiasco is giving ‘great pause’ to even the hawks on the FOMC. We’ll get a clearer picture of just how tight the deliberations were at the last FOMC meeting when the minutes are released later today.

The article late on Monday by WSJ Fed watcher Jon Hilsenrath suggested that negotiations inside the Fed were “tense” and produced “muddled” signals to the market. I would suggest that muddled signals may have in fact been the intent, taking a page from the playbook of Alan Greenspan.

Keeping the market on its heels, wondering will they or won’t they is a way to prevent big bets in either direction. However, when all is said and done, the sluggish economy, stubbornly high unemployment and tepid inflation (at least by official measures) likely means the Fed won’t be tapering any time soon. That’s actually probably more true under Yellen’s leadership and amid expectations that more short-term solutions for the budget and debt ceiling are in the offing.

Once the market reconciles this reality, that the fiscal headwinds courtesy of Congress and über-accommodative Fed policy are here to stay, gold should attract renewed buying interest. Certainly the safe-haven appeal of the yellow metal is heightened the closer we get to default without some kind of deal.

Do Not Express The Value Of Gold In Monopoly Money

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 09:23 AM PDT

In his latest article, Richard Geene explains that the main reason that the masses ignore the inevitable failure of fiat money systems, such as that which is employed by the US and virtually the rest of the world today, is because just prior to their demise, they have more recently been remembered for generating a widespread period of prosperity that has enriched its supporters, if not the masses as well. The fundamental flaw in a fiat money system can be summed up as human nature. When the going gets rough, the rough start printing. (source: Thunder Capital Management)

This is nothing new. Monetary history shows that as soon “a country went to a fiat currency there was a period, as long or longer than 30 years, in which it thrived even more. However, during that period of prosperity on a fiat currency, excesses began to build. Once they have built up to extreme levels, it is a very dangerous time. When levels of debt become too excessive, an increasing amount of the rewards of production; profits, must go to servicing debt. When the servicing of debt consumes all of the profits of production, it finally consumes production itself. This is the real culprit for the loss of jobs domestically. As more of the economy shifts from real production of goods, to the pushing of various forms of paper, citizens lose jobs and live in more dangerous times. We have reached that time.”

Paper currencies seem normal.  They seem natural.  We are told they are necessary.  Paper currencies with no intrinsic value are used everywhere – we pretend they are valuable.   If we don't look closely, or remember the world of 60 years ago, they seem like a good idea.

Monopoly money.  Euros.  Dollars.  What is the essential difference?  Paper, with no intrinsic value, is accepted only because we have confidence in the issuer of the currency and/or because we have no other choice.  Monopoly money can buy hotels on Park Place.  Unbacked paper dollars can buy hotels in Manhattan.  The hundreds of unbacked paper currencies that have become worthless during the last century can buy NOTHING.

If I am playing Monopoly and I change the rules to allow me, and only me, to add $85,000 to my stack of money, it seems likely I will "win" and own more property.  Eventually, no one will want to play with me because I created $85,000 of fraudulent Monopoly money.

If I am a central banker and I create $85,000,000,000 every month to buy bonds, I will own lots of bonds in a few years.  People will eventually realize my $85,000,000,000 per month gives me and my friends an unfair advantage and most others will refuse to play with me except when necessary, and they will certainly seek other "games" that are more fair and less slanted toward the player who can create boatloads of currency from nothing.

From Richard Russell:  (link)

"For the first time in history, ALL the major central banks are printing money.  One of two things will occur.  If they continue to print, their respective currencies will lose their purchasing power, and we'll have inflation or even hyper-inflation.  If the central banks pull back on their printing, we'll have crashing markets and a world depression."

Should we trust our central bankers?  They largely control our financial lives.  Inflation, deflation, depression, prosperity, booms, and busts are strongly influenced by banking policies, interest rates, and the availability of currency and credit, all of which are influenced by central banks.

Jim Grant:  (link)

"Gold is a legacy monetary asset.  It was there before they printed paper.

The price is the reciprocal of the world's faith in central bankers.  The world ought to have much less faith in central bankers.  As that proper distrust grows, the gold price will appreciate.  I think gold is cheap at this price."

The world is overloaded with debt.  As Bill Bonner said, "To solve the debt problem they added debt!  The genius of this plan was, we admit, not immediately obvious."  We think it is progressively more obvious that creating a massive quantity of currency each month – say $85,000,000,000 – is helping few outside the financial community and will eventually cause considerable harm to the economy and the purchasing power of the dollar.

We all know that:

  • There is no free lunch.
  • The piper must be paid.
  • Actions have consequences.
  • The U.S. government has spent more than it collects in taxes for a long time.
  • The U.S. official debt is growing much more rapidly than the underlying economy which must support that debt.
  • The U.S. unfunded liabilities are growing even faster than the official debt.
  • "Printing" dollars, inflating the money supply, extend and pretend, financial repression, and ever-increasing government control will eventually have dire consequences.

What are the "solutions" to our massive and unpayable debt conundrum?

1)   Increase taxes and pay off the national debt.  This will not happen.

2)   The "nuclear" option:  Default on much of the debt, force most individuals, businesses, and governments into some form of bankruptcy, and thereby liquidate most of the debt and the related paper assets.  Politicians will avoid this option.

3)   Create a massive inflation and thereby reduce the debt burden.  Descriptive words that come to mind are:  ugly, dangerous, social upheaval, food riots, bread lines, suicide, tears, anger, homelessness, denial, repression, martial law, and chaos.  This is probably the only choice remaining.

Hugo Salinas Price: (link)

"We have only limited knowledge regarding what massive monetary inflation really means.  Those who are going to apply it know only some of the effects, not all of them.  … Thus the hand that will implement massive inflation trembles in doubt.  Yet, there is no other recourse.

The world will plunge into the darkness of massive world inflation.  There is no other alternative.  It must take place, but what will happen then is obscure.  We are going into uncharted waters."

"In the coming world-uncertainty and fear, humans will adopt the same measures spontaneously, and a flight into gold and silver will take place."

"The Powers-That-Be" appear to prefer a distracted populace, slowly rising prices, a strong dollar, weak gold prices, and minimal restrictions on their ability to accumulate assets and power.  There will be trauma if currencies collapse, gold prices skyrocket, and inflation flies out of control.  We can reasonably expect that the governments of the world will "do something" that unfortunately will NOT solve the problems of collapsing currencies and out of control inflation.

Michael Noonan:  (link)

"Central banks and governments produce nothing.  Governments exist by sucking the financial lifeblood from the same citizens the government is supposed to serve."

"If the prices of gold and silver were allowed to reflect their true worth, it would totally undermine the existence of the "dollar" and topple central bankers and governments.  Those banksters in control are not going to go down without a fight, and they will destroy existing western currencies in the process.  If the paper "dollar" is how you measure your worth, you have been warned."

When paper assets are overvalued, gold and silver prices are likely to be undervalued.  How much are paper assets and unbacked paper currencies truly worth?  That is a huge question.  Consider:

  • Will "solving" an excessive debt problem by issuing more debt decrease the value of existing paper assets and unbacked paper currencies?
  • Will $1,000 Trillion (more or less) in unregulated paper derivatives decrease the value of paper assets and unbacked paper currencies when the inevitable "accident" occurs?
  • Will creating $85,000,000,000 every month decrease the value of paper assets and the unbacked paper dollar?
  • Will even more aggressive money printing in Japan decrease the value of paper assets and the unbacked paper Yen?
  • Will our current monetary craziness and Quantitative Easing (QE) produce prosperity and a stronger economy or weaker currencies and paper assets of reduced value?

SRSrocco Report:  (link)

"The global financial system is floating on a sea of worthless paper assets.  Unfortunately, the majority of people still haven't figured out that the end of this fiat monetary system is close at hand."

"The rate at which the dollar is being abandoned by international trade portends the end of the U.S. Dollar as a reserve currency much sooner than later.  This is the very reason why the paper prices of gold and silver have been manipulated lower since 2013.  The threat of much higher gold and silver prices is an immediate threat to the Dollar."

Will all this economic nonsense – unbacked paper currencies, massive printing (QE) of currencies, gold price manipulation, unregulated derivatives, out-of-control deficit spending, creating more debt to solve an excess debt problem, and so on – work out well for anyone except the financial and political elite?

Jim Grant:  (link)

"I think the odds against a painless, peaceful and placid exit from all of this dollar, yen, euro and pound sterling creation, the odds against returning to something like normalcy, are very slight indeed.  Therefore one ought to think about assets that will hold their value against money."

So what do we do to prepare – to "prep" for the coming paper currency disaster?

Arabian Money:  (link)

"What you want to buy is an insurance policy against this coming catastrophe and preferably one that does not have a third party between you and your money.  Gold is the ultimate money in times of chaos."

SO OUR SUGGESTIONS ARE:

  • Realize that holding unbacked paper money is like holding an explosive device with a long burning fuse.  Eventually that paper money will explode into worthlessness – it may survive for some time – but history shows clearly that paper money eventually declines to its intrinsic value – near zero.
  • Transition out of paper assets and into something real, such as land, buildings, gold, silver, mines, and farms.
  • Prepare for the worst – an inflationary collapse – that may not occur but seems increasingly likely.  You will sleep better if you are prepared, unleveraged, and financially protected via safely stored gold and silver with no counter-party risk.
  • Expect the best:  responsible monetary policy, less government, less war, honest money, and a healthy economy.

 

Read more: TANSTAAFL, Butter and SilverThe Reality of Gold and the Nightmare of Paper

GE Christenson | The Deviant Investor

Gold Stock Investors Keep the Best and Dump the Rest

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 09:14 AM PDT

Greg McCoach, publisher of Mining Speculator newsletter, is not ashamed to admit he has taken a big hit in juniors in the last couple of years. What he has done in response is what he advises all investors to do in this interview with The Gold Report: Get rid of the also-rans and keep and build positions in those companies that have what it takes to gain in multiples when the market recovers. And he suggests six companies that could do just that. The Gold Report: You wrote recently, "The 2008 crisis will pale in comparison to what is now on the horizon." Given that the 2008 crisis nearly destroyed the world economy, how bad will the next crisis be?

Market Monitor – October 9th

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 09:10 AM PDT

Despite Correction, Silver Is Set Up To Super-Surge To $110

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 09:09 AM PDT

With continued volatility in the gold and silver markets, today acclaimed money manager Stephen Leeb told King World News that despite weakness, silver is now set up to "super-surge" to $110. Leeb discussed the surprising reason for the coming surge, as well as how the mainstream media will be used to explain it.

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Will The Real Goldman Sachs View On Gold Please Stand Up

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 09:09 AM PDT

The head of Goldman Sachs' commodities research area yesterday announced in headline-grabbing fashion that gold was a "slam dunk" sell.  What's truly stunning about this is that during the 2nd quarter this year, Goldman Sachs revealed in an SEC 13-F filing that it had accumulated over 4 million shares of GLD (that's half a billion dollars worth) of GLD to become the 6th largest holder.

True to its historical track record, Goldman often says one thing through its research reports but does the exact opposite with its capital.  I've written an article published by Seeking Alpha which compares the Goldman's "sell" report, which has no basis in factual analysis, with a list of fundamental factors that point to the reasons that Goldman is saying one thing but doing the exact opposite with its capital.  You can read my article here:  Follow The Money

But before you read that, consider this accounting from www.goldcore.com of the last time Goldman issued a highly publicized "sell" on gold back in 2007:

It is worth remembering that Goldman, to much fanfare and media attention, "told clients" in November 2007, to sell gold. On November 29, 2007, Goldman recommended that investors sell gold in 2008 and it named the strategy as one of its 'Top 10 Tips' for the year.

Gold subsequently rose nearly 6.4% in December 2007 alone - from $783.75/oz to $833.92/oz.

Gold then rose another 5.8% in 2008 - from $833.92/oz at the close on December 31, 2007, to close at $882.05/oz on December 31, 2008.

Gold rose 12.2% in the 13 months after Goldman's sell gold call. Gold then rose 23.4% in 2009, 27.1% in 2010, 10.1% in 2011 and 7% in 2012.

Thus, proving Goldman's 'Top Tip' prediction absolutely wrong and costing their clients and many of the unsuspecting public a lot of money in the process.

At the time, Goldman cut its gold forecast to $740/oz from $810/oz on a 12 month basis. One year later, gold closed at $882.05/oz - more than 19% above Goldman's 'forecast'.

The crystal ball gazing of Wall Street banks and hedge funds and others who have suggested gold is a bubble in recent years has cost many of the investment public dearly.

As ever, it remains wise to ignore the considerable noise that emanates from Wall Street and maintain a healthy, long term allocation to physical gold.

Nearing first gold pour, Carpathian short of cash, considering sale

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 08:55 AM PDT

Carpathian shares crumbled Wednesday as it outlined financial woes and mine commissioning delay.

Read more….

Yellen’s Fed news fails to shake gold’s "lethargy"

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 08:55 AM PDT

The gold price lost this week’s 1.4% gains on Wednesday morning, dropping below $1,310 as European shares recovered earlier losses.

Read more….

Kyrgyz leader rejects calls to nationalise Centerra mine

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 08:55 AM PDT

Kyrgyzstan’s president has rejected opposition calls to nationalise the Kumtor gold mine as violent riots over its ownership flared up again this week.

Read more….

Gold likely to consolidate as debt ceiling issues continue to hover

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 08:55 AM PDT

What is clear to Asia, if not to the U.S. is that gold is needed in the transition period away from a US dominated currency world, argues Julian Phillips.

Read more….

U.S., Switzerland Export Largest Ever Amounts Of Gold To Hong Kong And Investors Should Take Note

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 08:09 AM PDT

09-Oct (SeekingAlpha) — Chinese gold import data have just been released for August, and it shows that imports are still very strong. But what investors should really take note of is that imports into Hong Kong were close to 300 tonnes in August – which would put them on pace to suck up all of global mine supply.

[source]

Gold Bullion Continues to Drain Out of COMEX

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 07:56 AM PDT

It was announced this evening that President Obama will nominate Janet Yellen as the new Fed Chairman tomorrow, having been denied his first choice of Larry Summers by popular outrage. There were big adjustments in the registered (dealer) gold inventories at JPM and HSBC yesterday as a total of over 40,000 ounces of gold bullion moved back to the customer storage category.

Created Currencies ... Are Not Gold! (Financial Prepping 101)

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 07:12 AM PDT

Paper currencies seem normal. They seem natural. We are told they are necessary. Paper currencies with no intrinsic value are used everywhere - we pretend they are valuable. If we don't look closely, or remember the world of 60 years ago ... Read More...

A Paradigm Shift in Latin American Stocks

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 06:47 AM PDT

Given that I'm still neck-deep in assembling the October issue of The Casey Report—which covers such topics as Doug Casey's take on the government shutdown, a hunt for emerging market opportunities, and how to construct a bulletproof portfolio—I'll keep today's lead-in short and sweet. This week's article comes to us from Claudio Maulhardt, fund manager and partner at Buenos Aires-based Copernico Capital Partners, a hedge fund group that focuses on Latin American equities.

Latin American stocks have taken a beating along with all emerging markets recently. Yesteryear, you could make money in Latin America by simply buying and holding a broad index and letting the rising tide do its thing. That strategy doesn't work anymore.

Instead, as Claudio will explain, you must target individual companies with specific qualities that will help them rise above lackluster market performance. He concludes with a checklist of sorts that will help you separate the right companies from the wrong ones.

This article originally appeared in World Money Analyst, Mauldin Economics' publication that features a team of globally distributed investment analysts who scour the international markets, looking for investment opportunities outside of the US. If you find Claudio's analysis useful, you'll probably also enjoy this free report just published by the World Money Analyst team: The Trends in Global markets and Why You Need a Foreign Broker. Click here to access it.

 

Enjoy, and see you next week.

Dan Steinhart
Managing Editor of The Casey Report


Latin American Equities: Down but Not Out

By Claudio Maulhardt, World Money Analyst

Not so long ago, Latin American equities were a market darling. Then, the markets viewed signs of an economic recovery in the developed world as good news for Latin American stocks (higher EPS prospects), but signs of stagnation were also considered good news (as a lower discount rate would apply).

Now, the majority of Latin American stock markets have begun to trade as if the opposite were true. With the sole exception of Mexico, whose stock market has traditionally traded closer to the S&P 500, the rest of Latin equities have lost their glow. Latin stocks have registered a seventh consecutive month of investor outflows, and it does not look like the trend is going to reverse any time soon.

The change from hype to doubt is clearly reflected in the chart below. Latin equities were, incredibly, considered a safe haven after the 2008 financial crisis. From the end of 2008 to the end of 2010, Latin stocks outperformed the S&P 500 by an impressive 90%. Since then, the love affair has come to an end, and Latin equities have underperformed by more than 67%.

This change in the tide may be linked to Wall Street's permanent belief in "next year's" US growth, a story investors seem to like despite the lack of strong empirical support.

However, the main catalyst has undoubtedly been the weakness in China's economic growth and, most important, the shift in China's economic model from investment-driven to consumption-driven growth. There is a direct link between this "remodeling" and the string of monthly outflows that dedicated Latin American fund managers have experienced.

The math is simple: Lower Chinese investment means less demand for industrial commodities, which are produced in Latin America by some of the largest companies in the region, which make up a significant part of the country and regional indices.

The consensus of economists surveyed by Bloomberg was for all Latin American countries to have weaker current account balances in 2013 than in 2012. With interest rates rising and Wall Street expecting them to rise further as the US economy grows, financing the gap may become tougher for Latin economies.

This brings in the linkage to exchange rates, which constitute a not insignificant portion of Latin American equities' underperformance. Exchange rates helped EPS, book values, and leverage ratios look great in US dollar terms for many years. Now that the US dollar has strengthened against Latin American currencies, the opposite trend is under way.

How to Play the New Scenario

So the trend is not the friend of Latin American equity investors. Is it best to shun them for the time being? It's not that simple.

Latin equities were an easy trade for many years. The fad lifted all boats regardless of their individual merits, which made trading the indices or the associated ETFs the way to go. Now, it's not hard to see that the correction has been exacerbated by the unwinding of the macro trade.

Over the last decade, the weight of Latin American equities in the MSCI World Index has doubled, surging from roughly 2% to 4.4%. The MSCI Emerging Markets Latin American Index has a US$1.5 trillion market cap, which makes simply neglecting it a tough decision for index fund managers.

The problem is that it is hard to trade Latin American equities as if they were a single asset class. Trading ETFs or indices may mean that good opportunities are missed. An index is comprised of a wide array of stocks whose issuers will not necessarily perform similarly in various economic environments.

Appreciating currencies and the wide availability of credit in the last decade has meant that stocks most closely linked to domestic consumption were the winners by far. The new picture of weaker currencies and tougher credit conditions means that the winners of the past may not fare as well in the future.

A New Approach

The next winning theme will be foreign-currency earners (mainly exporters) and, more important, stocks with little or no debt held in a foreign currency—and especially with no debt in foreign currency if it has no foreign currency income to match the servicing of that debt. Those are the characteristics you want to look for in a solid Latin American investment.

It's hard to believe that the cycle of weaker currencies, weaker current accounts, and weaker EPS growth is about to reach its end in the near future. However, this is not the end of the Latin American investment theme; it only means that the approach must change. There are companies whose business profiles will help them thrive in what may otherwise look like a generally challenging scenario for Latin American stocks. Going with the flow may prevent investors from grabbing the opportunity that these stocks offer.

Rust Belt Boom: Oil Investing for the Next 100 Years

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 06:00 AM PDT

I just spent two solid days at a conference on energy development in regional shale plays of Pennsylvania-Ohio-West Virginia, called Marcellus and Utica.

Let me tell you: Investment opportunities near where I live in Pittsburgh are eye-popping! Today I want to give you a hint of what’s coming.

Like the man says, “Follow the money.”

According to a room full of geologists, lawyers, business executives, bankers, land-men, drillers, engineers, state regulators and more, oil and gas resources of just these two rock formations are beyond astounding. I’m talking about the Utica and Marcellus shale formations.

Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays

In fact, here in western Pennsylvania, we may be sitting on one of the five largest energy plays in the world — smack in the middle of the old “Rust Belt” of America! This new energy investment cycle will last for a century or more, while enriching countless households.

Unless you're close to the energy business, it can all be kind of hard to absorb. In fact, long-time Pittsburgh residents look at me funny when I say that the city — the region, really — is transforming into “Houston of the northeast.” They just don’t get it.

Looking back, it’s fair to say that the Arab Spring thing was fake history, created by media spin.

Here’s an illustration. I was eating lunch downtown the other day, with a local newspaper reporter. The guy prides himself as an expert on local and state politics. We discussed energy development and what it means to Pennsylvania. The reporter mentioned that the recent wave of capital investment is “mostly rural.” It’s happening “out in the hills and weeds,” he said. Finally, he added, “It’s payday for cow-farmers.”

Suddenly, as if on cue, a great big, dark blue truck came rumbling down the street, right outside, amidst all the urban buildup. The truck had the name Schlumberger (SLB) painted on the side. Oh, how I wish I’d been carrying my camera. People were gawking at the vehicle like it was some alien craft from outer space.

I looked at my reporter-acquaintance. “Hey,” I said, “looks like the Schlumberger guy is hauling money to cow-farmers here in the ‘big evil city,’ too!”

This will go on for a long time to come, and it’s all investable.

This investment opportunity and increased domestic energy production could not have come at a more favorable time, for many reasons. In terms of national energy security, for instance, things in the Middle East are bad and getting worse. It’s not overstating the case to say that the Middle East source of global energy supply is problematic on the best of days.

Again and again here, I return to the Middle East Oil Wars scenario. The so-called “Arab Spring” of 2010 and 2011 has faded away. It was a desert mirage in any case.

Here in the West, many people have a unique conceit about the desirability of our own culture, certainly for “foreigners.” It’s part of a psychological tendency to mirror-image other people — to think that they want what we want because it’s just so wonderful and cool, yadda, yadda. It’s part of how we feel good about ourselves, I suppose.

Thus a couple of years ago, when protesters in, say, Egypt came along with their smart-phones and Twitter accounts, a lot of people believed that fundamental change was afoot. Egypt would be the next great democratic transition or such — it would westernize. Not at all. (I sure didn’t believe it. In fact, I recommended my readers sell Apache Oil Co. – a company with at-risk Egypt exposure.)

Today the image of social media protesters in Tahrir Square has vanished. It’ll be a long time before we see anything like that again in Egypt — if it ever returns. Looking back, it’s fair to say that the Arab Spring thing was fake history, created by media spin.

Fake history, in the sense that the Arab Spring did NOT accomplish what its supporters falsely promised. Closed societies are still closed. Unfree places are still unfree. Violent locales are still violent. In the end, Arab Spring made unstable places even more unstable. Western ideas of “human rights” have certainly not replaced the traditional, devout Islamic approach that uses the Koran as a sort of constitution.

Arab Spring certainly failed to neuter Al Qaeda and its offshoots, which are now more active and widespread than ever before. In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood played a game of “Good Terrorist”/”Bad Terrorist” with the U.S., such that President Obama and his U.S. ambassador to Egypt were humiliated and are now among the most hated faces in that ancient land.

Presently, Egypt — and while we’re at it, Libya, Tunisia, Yemen and more — is back to where things were before Arab Spring. Meanwhile Syria is in the middle of a knock-down, no-quarters, multi-sided civil war.

Arab Spring or no, the Middle East remains a region of nation-states ruled by military guys and flinty bureaucrats whose institutions are, at best, legacies of British and French colonialism colored by many decades of Soviet-style authoritarianism.

Sticking with the Egypt theme, former President Hosni Mubarak will never return to power. But then again, Egypt has many cadres of shrewd, cold-blooded generals who are more than prepared to run a near-insolvent oligarchy that survives on foreign aid from other wealthy Arab nations.

And if the Middle East is where we get much of the world’s oil, I say drill more wells in Pennsylvania and Ohio. For our purposes here in OI, invest away from the turmoil — offshore, and in lands far from the troubles. I’ve laid this out many times before.

Still, how far away — or close — are those troubles? I mean, don’t dismiss the problems of Egypt just because the place is on another continent.

On that note, let’s address that terrible terrorist attack in Nairobi, Kenya. Did you follow that? Kenya is far away, yet as a senior official of the Department of Homeland Security once stated to me, “This is coming to a theater or mall near you.”

In other words, this kind of “far away” conflict is out there, and can spread like wildfire. It’s asymmetrical warfare. As raw terrorism goes, attacks like the Kenya effort require only small numbers of people with fairly low, even crude tech. That, and simple levels of organization.

Meanwhile, rumor has it that one of the Nairobi terrorists was a Caucasian woman from Britain who the police call the “White Widow” because her deceased husband was one of the 2007 London bombers. And some of the other Nairobi terrorists may have learned their jihad lessons in Minnesota — we’ll see about that.

Think about what happened. Nairobi’s Westgate Mall was oriented toward expatriates and an upper crust of local clientele. It was a soft target, as these things go. The terrorists were small in number, perhaps, but very well organized.

According to reliable accounts, ringleaders spent nearly a year plotting the attack and casing the place. For a time, the White Widow woman lived in a rented house in South Africa, which is a “cooling off” locale for international terrorists, according to what I learned from a very senior South African official during one of my visits there.

The Nairobi terrorists even spent time, before the attack, smuggling smuggled weapons into the mall. Then when the attack went down, the terrorists started shooting and quickly seized many hostages. They separated Muslims from non-Muslims before beginning to kill the latter. (Muslims were allowed to go free if they could recite a Muslim prayer.)

Hostages fared horribly, with press accounts of barbaric torture and gruesome executions. It’s all blood-curdling. Indeed, I won’t go there but feel free to do your own due diligence.

I mention all of this because I suspect these kind of domestic, if not “mall terror” stories will become more common and eventually arrive here in the U.S. or Canada. We could awaken one day to all manner of assaults on people, places and/or critical infrastructure.

Sad to say, we do NOT live in the happy, “flat world” postulated by columnist Thomas Friedman of the New York Times, in his 2005 book of similar name.

So why bring this up in these pages? Well, I’m not here to regale you with tales of brutal savagery by terrorist wackos, nor train you how to resist attacks at the neighborhood mall. But part of my editorial role is to offer advice on how to protect your wealth when — not “if” — things start to get bad in critical parts of the world, not to mention close to home.

My goal is to give you solid investment ideas and perspective, while keeping you up to speed on what’s going on across literally a globe full of dangers and opportunity.

Thus I focus on oil and natural gas. Plus gold, silver, platinum, palladium, copper and related technology materials like graphite and other plastics and such.

I can’t stop the Middle East from falling off a cliff. Nor can we do much when the world’s most vicious terrorists decide to attack a mall down the street. But together, we can work to preserve your wealth in good times and bad.

Because right now, in this dangerous world, everything you value is at risk. You need to understand what’s happening. You need to think in terms of how to invest around the world’s worst problems, to defend yourself and your family.

That’s all for now. Thanks for reading.

Best wishes…

Byron W. King
for The Daily Reckoning

Ed. Note: Wanna know exactly where to invest in the emerging rust belt energy boom? Sign up for The Daily Resource Hunter. Every day, it details specific energy plays and offers readers a chance to discover the companies in the best position to profit. It’s completely free to sign up, and there’s no obligation. Sign up for FREE, right here.

Original article posted on Daily Resource Hunter

SILVER Elliott Wave Technical Analysis

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 05:37 AM PDT

Silver: A downwards zigzag is unfolding at primary wave degree. Within the zigzag intermediate wave (A) is complete. Intermediate wave (B) is an incomplete zigzag. Minor wave B is an incomplete double zigzag. Read More...

Gold Declines in New York as Investors Assess Stimulus, Debt

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 05:32 AM PDT

09-Oct (Bloomberg) — Gold fell for a second day in New York as investors weighed the deadlock between U.S. lawmakers over the debt limit and government shutdown, and the implications for monetary stimulus by the Federal Reserve.

Gold slumped 22 percent this year on expectations the Fed will taper its $85 billion-a-month of bond-buying as the economy improves. The White House prepared to nominate Janet Yellen, the key architect of the Fed's unprecedented stimulus program, to head the central bank as President Barack Obama said that he's willing to talk to Republicans about anything once lawmakers end the closing and increase borrowing authority.

"Gold's direction will come from how people view the possibility that the Fed's tapering of its bond-buying program begins this year," said Mark To, head of research at Wing Fung Financial Group, a Hong Kong-based trader and refiner.

[source]

Gold lower at 1304.50 (-15.40). Silver 21.87 (-0.47). Dollar jumps. Euro lower. Stocks called better. US 10yr 2.64% (+1 bp).

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 05:28 AM PDT

Gold Prices Flirt with $1300 as Yellen Moves to Chair US Fed

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 05:16 AM PDT

GOLD PRICES dipped below $1300 per ounce for the first time in 1 week Wednesday afternoon in London, dropping 2.6% from yesterday's high after news broke that Janet Yellen is set to lead the US Fed when Ben Bernanke steps down as chairman in February 2014.
 
The US Dollar rose, and European shares fell into the red for the day after earlier recovering losses. US stocks also dropped.
 
Commodities ticked lower, as did major government bonds. Short-term US debt set to mature this month, after the October 17th debt ceiling deadline, fell hard to drive T-bill yields higher again to 0.36%. They were negative as recently as late September.
 
Silver followed gold prices down after the news on Janet Yellen, but retained a 10 cent gain for the week so far.
 
"[Gold prices] continue to hang in limbo," noted a Singapore trading desk earlier, "unable to rally yet does not want to give up $1300 handle."
 
"Sentiment has changed. People don't seem to be flocking to gold, even in times of distress," said Jim Iuorio, managing director of TJM Institutional Services in Chicago to CNBC on Tuesday.
 
Currently Federal Reserve vice-chair, Janet Yellen is a renowned "dove" on low interest rates and stronger quantitative easing. Sources quoted by several US papers today said she is set to be confirmed as President Obama's choice to succeed Ben Bernanke as Fed chief.
 
"The closer the US comes to reaching its debt ceiling," say commodity analysts at Commerzbank in Germany, "and the more the risk of insolvency grows as a result, the more gold should be in demand as a safe haven in the west...which should be reflected in climbing gold prices.
 
"Perhaps the gold price will be shaken out of its lethargy when the Fed minutes are published this evening," says the bank, asking if the delay in 'QE tapering' last month was due to the US central bank's fears over a drop in government spending.
 
But "once we get past this stalemate in Washington, precious metals are a slam dunk to sell," reckoned investment bank Goldman Sach's head of commodities research Jeffery Currie, speaking Tuesday at Commodities Week here in London.
 
Selling gold is his top raw materials trade for 2014, a view agreed Tuesday by Swiss investment and bullion bank Credit Suisse's research chief Ric Deverell.
 
"You have to argue that with significant recovery in the US," said Currie, "tapering of QE should put downward pressure on gold prices."
 
Economic growth in the UK is set to outstrip the US in 2013, the International Monetary Fund said Tuesday, adding that it was "pleasantly surprised" by Britain's 'austerity' policies failing to hurt growth as the IMF warned in April.
 
UK manufacturing and industrial output today showed a sharp drop for August, defying analyst forecasts of strong growth.
 
The Pound fell hard after the news, dropping to a 2-week low beneath $1.60. That buoyed gold prices for UK investors above £820 per ounce, some 0.8% below an earlier spike to 1-week highs.
 
Gold prices for Euro investors also eased back, touching last week's closing level at €967 per ounce as the single currency fell despite much stronger-than-expected German industrial output data for August.
 
Currie at Goldman Sachs now sees his target for year-end 2014 at $1050 per ounce – a "key gold level" according to panellists speaking last week at the London Bullion Market Association's conference in Rome.

Fiat Paper Currencies are NOT Gold!

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 04:59 AM PDT

Paper currencies seem normal. They seem natural. We are told they are necessary. Paper currencies with no intrinsic value are used everywhere - we pretend they are valuable. If we don't look closely, or remember the world of 60 years ago, they seem like a good idea. Monopoly money. Euros. Dollars. What is the essential difference? Paper, with no intrinsic value, is accepted only because we have confidence in the issuer of the currency and/or because we have no other choice. Monopoly money can buy hotels on Park Place. Unbacked paper dollars can buy hotels in Manhattan. The hundreds of unbacked paper currencies that have become worthless during the last century can buy NOTHING.

Yellen's Fed News Fails to Shake Gold's Lethargy, Goldman Targets $1050

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 04:49 AM PDT

The WHOLESALE price of gold gave back this week's 1.4% gains Wednesday morning in London, dropping below $1310 per ounce as European shares recovered earlier losses. Commodities ticked lower, as did non-US government bonds, while silver followed gold lower, but retained a 1.0% gain for the week so far.

Why We Own Gold

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 03:24 AM PDT

Why gold? Debt piles on debt, with the threat of a gigantic financial reset...
 
The DAILY MAIL no longer has a monopoly on libelling the dead. The Financial Times is also doing a pretty good job, writes Tim Price on his blog, ThePriceOfEverything.
 
John Aglionby's story this week ('Libertarian economics underpinned Silk Road Bitcoin drug website') was, even by the standards of a paper coloured pink that should really be coloured yellow, an extraordinary piece of character assassination.
"The goods and services traded on the semi-secretive website Silk Road since February 2011 with the virtual currency Bitcoins were so varied that the Federal Bureau of Investigation described it as 'the most sophisticated and extensive criminal marketplace on the internet today'...
 
"Its philosophical underpinnings, however, were not solely a desire to get rich quick but, according to the FBI complaint published on Wednesday after the site was shut down, 'Austrian economic theory' and the works of Ludwig von Mises and Murray Rothbard, economists closely associated with the Mises Institute, in the US state of Alabama."
You do not have to be a believer in Austrian business cycle theory to find the linkage between an apparently criminal website and two widely respected economic theorists to be utterly objectionable. Those FT readers moved to respond on the paper's website tended to think similarly:
"the lowest of lows..."
 
"FT trying to discredit Ludwig von Mises, the Austrian business cycle theory and Bitcoins all in one go...For god's sake, you do not have any decency left.."
 
"childish, glib and misleading...a new low for the FT...Disgusting, to say the least"
 
"Another shining example of the death of journalism..."
 
"Sorry to say, but you all seem to fail to understand that the FT is making a heroic attempt to switch from factual financial reporting to a top position in entertainment of the masses. Don't you think they are doing well? I most certainly do."
That the Austrian business cycle theory should be held in such low esteem by such a prominent financial journal might be taken as an admission of guilt for not having noticed the credit bubble while it was inflating, and for then having continually defended the (neo-Keynesian) establishment line rather than debate the practical value of any alternative policy course.
 
In Austrian business cycle theory, the central bank is the culprit responsible for every boom and bust, firstly in fuelling excessive bank credit growth and maintaining interest rates at overly stimulative lows; then in prolonging the inevitable recession by propping up asset prices, bailing out insolvent banks, and attempting to stimulate the economy via the mechanism of deficit spending.
 
It is difficult to see why the theory is so problematic given that the US Federal Reserve, for example, is not an agency of the US government per se but rather a private banking cartel. When push comes to shove, whose interests will the Fed ultimately protect – those of the banks, or those of the rest of the productive population?
 
But in any discussion of the 'long emergency' enduring throughout the insolvent West, the role of politicians should not be ignored. If politicians had moderated their tendencies to make unaffordable promises to their electorates, western fiscal disasters and the attendant debt mountains would now be less dramatic. And if politicians were not slaves to the electoral calendar, it is fair to assume that difficult choices might even have been taken in the long term interests of their respective economies.
 
The current gridlock in the US political system (first over the shutdown and latterly over the debt ceiling) is a perfect example of grandstanding politicians abdicating all responsibility for the electorate they claim to serve. And as a glaring example of cognitive dissonance, Treasury bond investors' responses to fears over a looming default really do take some beating.
 
That beating should, of course, be reserved for investors stupid enough to believe that debt issued by the world's largest debtor country should be somehow treated as risk-free, especially when the possibility of formal default is only a matter of days away.
 
Treasury bond defenders will no doubt point out that in a fiat currency world where the central bank has the freedom to print ex nihilo money to its heart's content, the very idea of default is absurd. But that is to confuse nominal returns with real ones.
 
Yes, the Fed can expand its balance sheet indefinitely beyond the $3 trillion they have already conjured out of nowhere. The world need not fear a shortage of Dollars. But in real terms, that's precisely the point. The Fed can control the supply of Dollars, but it cannot control their value on the foreign exchanges. The only reason that US QE hasn't led to a dramatic erosion in the value of the Dollar is that every other major economic bloc is up to the same tricks. This makes the rational analysis of international investments virtually impossible. It is also why we own gold – because it is a currency that cannot be printed by the Fed or anybody else.
 
On the topic of gold, the indefatigable Ronni Stoeferle of Incrementum in Liechtenstein has published his latest magisterial gold chartbook. (FT: if you're reading, Ronni is an Austrian, so you'll probably want to start the character assassinating now.) Set against the correction in the gold price 1974-1976, the current sell-off (September 2011 – ?) is nothing new. The question is really whether our financial (and in particular debt) circumstances today are better than they were in the 1970s. We would merely suggest that they are objectively worse.
 
Whatever happens in the absurd and increasingly dangerous debate over raising the US debt ceiling, the fundamental problem remains throughout the western economic system. Governments have lived beyond their means for decades and must tighten their belts. Taxes are certain to rise, and welfare systems certain to contract. Even if western governments manage to rein in their morbidly obese consumption patterns without a disorderly market crisis, their legacy will be felt by generations yet to come.
 
The debt mountain cannot and will not resolve itself. (Why, again, we own gold; because we think there is a non-trivial chance of a gigantic financial system reset.) The piper must, at some point, be paid. Western economic policy can be distilled down into just four words: the unborn cannot vote.

Why We Own Gold

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 03:24 AM PDT

Why gold? Debt piles on debt, with the threat of a gigantic financial reset...
 
The DAILY MAIL no longer has a monopoly on libelling the dead. The Financial Times is also doing a pretty good job, writes Tim Price on his blog, ThePriceOfEverything.
 
John Aglionby's story this week ('Libertarian economics underpinned Silk Road Bitcoin drug website') was, even by the standards of a paper coloured pink that should really be coloured yellow, an extraordinary piece of character assassination.
"The goods and services traded on the semi-secretive website Silk Road since February 2011 with the virtual currency Bitcoins were so varied that the Federal Bureau of Investigation described it as 'the most sophisticated and extensive criminal marketplace on the internet today'...
 
"Its philosophical underpinnings, however, were not solely a desire to get rich quick but, according to the FBI complaint published on Wednesday after the site was shut down, 'Austrian economic theory' and the works of Ludwig von Mises and Murray Rothbard, economists closely associated with the Mises Institute, in the US state of Alabama."
You do not have to be a believer in Austrian business cycle theory to find the linkage between an apparently criminal website and two widely respected economic theorists to be utterly objectionable. Those FT readers moved to respond on the paper's website tended to think similarly:
"the lowest of lows..."
 
"FT trying to discredit Ludwig von Mises, the Austrian business cycle theory and Bitcoins all in one go...For god's sake, you do not have any decency left.."
 
"childish, glib and misleading...a new low for the FT...Disgusting, to say the least"
 
"Another shining example of the death of journalism..."
 
"Sorry to say, but you all seem to fail to understand that the FT is making a heroic attempt to switch from factual financial reporting to a top position in entertainment of the masses. Don't you think they are doing well? I most certainly do."
That the Austrian business cycle theory should be held in such low esteem by such a prominent financial journal might be taken as an admission of guilt for not having noticed the credit bubble while it was inflating, and for then having continually defended the (neo-Keynesian) establishment line rather than debate the practical value of any alternative policy course.
 
In Austrian business cycle theory, the central bank is the culprit responsible for every boom and bust, firstly in fuelling excessive bank credit growth and maintaining interest rates at overly stimulative lows; then in prolonging the inevitable recession by propping up asset prices, bailing out insolvent banks, and attempting to stimulate the economy via the mechanism of deficit spending.
 
It is difficult to see why the theory is so problematic given that the US Federal Reserve, for example, is not an agency of the US government per se but rather a private banking cartel. When push comes to shove, whose interests will the Fed ultimately protect – those of the banks, or those of the rest of the productive population?
 
But in any discussion of the 'long emergency' enduring throughout the insolvent West, the role of politicians should not be ignored. If politicians had moderated their tendencies to make unaffordable promises to their electorates, western fiscal disasters and the attendant debt mountains would now be less dramatic. And if politicians were not slaves to the electoral calendar, it is fair to assume that difficult choices might even have been taken in the long term interests of their respective economies.
 
The current gridlock in the US political system (first over the shutdown and latterly over the debt ceiling) is a perfect example of grandstanding politicians abdicating all responsibility for the electorate they claim to serve. And as a glaring example of cognitive dissonance, Treasury bond investors' responses to fears over a looming default really do take some beating.
 
That beating should, of course, be reserved for investors stupid enough to believe that debt issued by the world's largest debtor country should be somehow treated as risk-free, especially when the possibility of formal default is only a matter of days away.
 
Treasury bond defenders will no doubt point out that in a fiat currency world where the central bank has the freedom to print ex nihilo money to its heart's content, the very idea of default is absurd. But that is to confuse nominal returns with real ones.
 
Yes, the Fed can expand its balance sheet indefinitely beyond the $3 trillion they have already conjured out of nowhere. The world need not fear a shortage of Dollars. But in real terms, that's precisely the point. The Fed can control the supply of Dollars, but it cannot control their value on the foreign exchanges. The only reason that US QE hasn't led to a dramatic erosion in the value of the Dollar is that every other major economic bloc is up to the same tricks. This makes the rational analysis of international investments virtually impossible. It is also why we own gold – because it is a currency that cannot be printed by the Fed or anybody else.
 
On the topic of gold, the indefatigable Ronni Stoeferle of Incrementum in Liechtenstein has published his latest magisterial gold chartbook. (FT: if you're reading, Ronni is an Austrian, so you'll probably want to start the character assassinating now.) Set against the correction in the gold price 1974-1976, the current sell-off (September 2011 – ?) is nothing new. The question is really whether our financial (and in particular debt) circumstances today are better than they were in the 1970s. We would merely suggest that they are objectively worse.
 
Whatever happens in the absurd and increasingly dangerous debate over raising the US debt ceiling, the fundamental problem remains throughout the western economic system. Governments have lived beyond their means for decades and must tighten their belts. Taxes are certain to rise, and welfare systems certain to contract. Even if western governments manage to rein in their morbidly obese consumption patterns without a disorderly market crisis, their legacy will be felt by generations yet to come.
 
The debt mountain cannot and will not resolve itself. (Why, again, we own gold; because we think there is a non-trivial chance of a gigantic financial system reset.) The piper must, at some point, be paid. Western economic policy can be distilled down into just four words: the unborn cannot vote.

TF Metals Report: Goldman buys gold after panicking speculators to sell

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 02:17 AM PDT

5:14p ChST Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Turd Ferguson of the TF Metals Report goes into the fine print of market reports and finds that Goldman Sachs is buying gold whenever it helps to panic speculators into selling it:

http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/blog/5131/paging-dr-crane

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Jim Sinclair Plans Seminar in Washington on Oct. 19

Gold mining entrepreneur and gold advocate Jim Sinclair will hold a seminar with questions and answers on Saturday, October 19, at a hotel at the international airport for Washington, D.C. To register for the seminar and learn more about it, including the discounted rate available at the hotel, please visit Sinclair's Internet site, JSMineSet, here:

http://www.jsmineset.com/qa-session-tickets/



Join GATA here:

Louis Boulanger Now Seminar
Visitors Center, Holy Trinity Parnell
Auckland, New Zeland
Sunday, October 13, 2013

http://www.gata.org/files/GATAInNewZealand.pdf

Gold Investment Symposium 2013
Luna Park Conference Center, Sydney, Australia
Wednesday-Thursday, October 16-17, 2013

http://gold.symposium.net.au/

The Silver Summit
Davenport Hotel, Spokane, Washington
Thursday-Friday, October 24-25, 2013

http://www.cambridgehouse.com/event/silver-summit-2013

Mines and Money Australia
Melbourne Conference and Exhibition Centre
Tuesday, October 29-Friday, November 1, 2013

http://www.minesandmoney.com/

New Orleans Investment Conference
Sunday-Wednesday, November 10-13, 2013
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
New Orleans, Louisiana

https://jeffersoncompanies.com/landing/speakers?IDPromotion=613011610080...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing DVDs of our London conference in August 2011 or our Dawson City conference in August 2006:

http://www.goldrush21.com/order.html

Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

How to profit with silver --
and which stocks to buy now

Future Money Trends is offering a special 16-page silver report with our forecast for 2013 that includes profiles of nine companies and technical analysis of their stock performance. Six of the companies have market capitalizations of less than $800 million and one company has a market cap of only $30 million. The most exciting of these companies will begin production in a few weeks and has a market cap of just $150 million.

Half of all proceeds from the sale of this report will be donated to the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee to support its efforts exposing manipulation and fraud in the gold and silver markets.

To learn about this report, please visit:

http://www.futuremoneytrends.com/index.php?option=com_content&id=376&tmp...


Von Greyerz: Money printing will destroy currencies without helping economies

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 01:45 AM PDT

4:40p ChST Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Swiss gold fund manager Egon von Greyerz tells King World News that central bank money printing will do nothing for national economies even as it will destroy currencies and cause a debt implosion:

http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2013/10/9_Go...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

How to profit with silver --
and which stocks to buy now

Future Money Trends is offering a special 16-page silver report with our forecast for 2013 that includes profiles of nine companies and technical analysis of their stock performance. Six of the companies have market capitalizations of less than $800 million and one company has a market cap of only $30 million. The most exciting of these companies will begin production in a few weeks and has a market cap of just $150 million.

Half of all proceeds from the sale of this report will be donated to the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee to support its efforts exposing manipulation and fraud in the gold and silver markets.

To learn about this report, please visit:

http://www.futuremoneytrends.com/index.php?option=com_content&id=376&tmp...



Join GATA here:

Louis Boulanger Now Seminar
Visitors Center, Holy Trinity Parnell
Auckland, New Zeland
Sunday, October 13, 2013

http://www.gata.org/files/GATAInNewZealand.pdf

Gold Investment Symposium 2013
Luna Park Conference Center, Sydney, Australia
Wednesday-Thursday, October 16-17, 2013

http://gold.symposium.net.au/

The Silver Summit
Davenport Hotel, Spokane, Washington
Thursday-Friday, October 24-25, 2013

http://www.cambridgehouse.com/event/silver-summit-2013

Mines and Money Australia
Melbourne Conference and Exhibition Centre
Tuesday, October 29-Friday, November 1, 2013

http://www.minesandmoney.com/

New Orleans Investment Conference
Sunday-Wednesday, November 10-13, 2013
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
New Orleans, Louisiana

https://jeffersoncompanies.com/landing/speakers?IDPromotion=613011610080...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing DVDs of our London conference in August 2011 or our Dawson City conference in August 2006:

http://www.goldrush21.com/order.html

Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Buy metals at GoldMoney and enjoy international storage

GoldMoney was established in 2001 by James and Geoff Turk and is safeguarding more than $1.7 billion in metals and currencies. Buy gold, silver, platinum, and palladium from GoldMoney over the Internet and store them in vaults in Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, ­taking advantage of GoldMoney's low storage rates, among the most competitive in the industry. GoldMoney also offers delivery of 100-gram and 1-kilogram gold bars and 1-kilogram silver bars. To learn more, please visit:

http://www.goldmoney.com/?gmrefcode=gata


Latest World Official Gold Reserves

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 01:00 AM PDT

Information on each country's gold reserves and the proportion this represents of their total external reserves. Updated quarterly.

Changes in World Gold Official Reserves

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 01:00 AM PDT

Shows month by month, how countries' reported gold holdings have changed since January 2002 and reasons where known. Updated quarterly.

Latest sales under the third Central Bank Gold Agreement (CBGA3)

Posted: 09 Oct 2013 01:00 AM PDT

Updated quarterly.

1 comment:

  1. The bank does not charge you on your principal amount. However, they do tax deductions on the profits that you make with them. For instance, some banks in Pakistan, if the profit/return paid is less than Rs 500,000, the tax will be deducted at the rate of 10 percent.

    ReplyDelete