A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Gold World News Flash

Gold World News Flash


The End of the Pier Show

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 06:21 PM PDT

Bullion Vault


Even Six-Figure Salaries Don’t Attract Men to Care Work

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 04:57 PM PDT

Until these jobs are given the respect they deserve, they will continue to turn men off and be paid less than they're worth.

Adam Davidson's recent New York Times Magazine article "The Best Nanny Money Can Buy" introduced readers to the "bizarre microeconomy" of New York's highly paid nannies. The first nanny Davidson introduces earns $180,000 a year, plus a Christmas bonus and an apartment on Central Park West.

Davidson's economy is indeed bizarre. As Bryce Covert pointed out in Forbes recently, the average New York nanny makes $37,076 a year. Childcare providers, home health care aids, and others are paid far too little for the incredibly important work they do. In the U.S., median pay for a childcare worker in 2010 was about $9 an hour.

Care work jobs have historically been paid poorly. Jobs associated with the work women traditionally did as wives and mothers have not been conceptualized as real work and have generally paid far less than traditionally male work. This was partially a result of the way laws were written. Until the 1970s, domestic workers were not included in the Fair Labor Standards Act that mandated a federal minimum wage, among other things. Read more......


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Gold Seeker Weekly Wrap-Up: Gold and Silver End Mixed on the Week

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 04:00 PM PDT

Gold fell $7.13 to $1650.47 in Asia before it shot up to $1667.30 in New York and then pared its gains a bit in the last few hours of trade, but it still ended with a gain of 0.28%. Silver surged to as high as $31.435 and ended with a gain of 0.61%.


By the Numbers for the Week Ending April 27

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 03:49 PM PDT

This week's closing table. 

20120427-Table

If the image is too small click on it for a larger version.

That is all for now, but there is more to come.       


Why Is It Necessary For The Federal Government To Turn The United States Into A Prison Camp?

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 03:17 PM PDT

Why Is It Necessary For The Federal Government To Turn The United States Into A Prison Camp?

There has been no society in the history of the world that has ever been 100% safe. No matter how much money the federal government spends on "homeland security", the truth is that bad things will still happen.  Our world is a very dangerous place and it is becoming increasingly unstable.  The federal government could turn the entire country into one giant prison camp, but that would still not keep us safe.  It is inevitable that bad stuff will happen in life.  But we have a choice.  We can choose to live in fear or we can choose to live as free men and women.  Our forefathers intended to establish a nation where liberty and freedom would be maximized. 

But today we are told that we have to give up our liberties and our freedoms and our privacy for increased security.  But is such a trade really worth it?  Just think of the various totalitarian societies that we have seen down throughout history.  Have any of them ever really thrived?  Have their people been happy?  Unfortunately, the U.S. federal government has decided that the entire country needs to be put on lock down.  Nearly everything that we do today is watched and tracked, and personal privacy is rapidly becoming a thing of the past.  Many of the things that George Orwell wrote about in 1984 are becoming a reality, and that is a very frightening thing.  The United States is supposed to be the land of the free and the home of the brave.  Sadly, we are rapidly becoming the exact opposite of that.

I don't know about you, but I never signed up to live in North Korea.  When I was growing up I was taught that repressive regimes such as North Korea are "the bad guys" and that America is where "the good guys" live.

So why do we want to be just like North Korea?

When they put in the naked body scanners at U.S. airports and started having TSA agents conduct "enhanced pat-downs" of travelers, I decided that I was not going to fly anymore unless absolutely necessary.

Then I heard about how "random bag checks" were being conducted at Metro train stations in the Washington D.C. area, and I was glad that I was no longer taking the train into D.C. anymore.

But now the TSA is showing up everywhere.  Down in Houston, undercover TSA agents and police officers will now "ride buses, perform random bag checks, and conduct K-9 sweeps, as well as place uniformed and plainclothes officers at Transit Centers and rail platforms to detect, prevent and address latent criminal activity or behavior."

So now I have another thing to add to my list of things that I can't do anymore.

No more riding buses for me.

But the truth is that you can't escape this expanding security grid no matter how hard you try.

In fact, TSA "VIPR teams" conduct approximately 8,000 "unannounced security screenings" every year at bus terminals, train stations, ports and highway rest stops throughout the United States.

Look, every society needs some level of security.  There are always bad guys out there that want to harm innocent people.

But in the United States we must demand that those in charge of our security do their jobs in a way that does not compromise our dignity, our liberties or our freedoms.

Does having TSA thugs touch the private parts of old women and young children before they get on their flights keep us any safer?

Of course not.

But it does move our country in a very dangerous direction.

The reality is that this "Big Brother control grid" that is being constructed all around us is expanding in a thousand different ways.

For example, a new bill before the U.S. Congress would require black box data recorders to be installed in all new vehicles starting in 2015.  These black box data recorders will be able to constantly transmit data about everything that your car is  doing to the government and to the insurance companies.  The following is from a recent article by Eric Peters....

And naturally, they – the government, insurance companies – will be able to track your every move, noting (and recording) where you've been and when. This will create a surveillance net beyond anything that ever existed previously. Some will not sweat this: After all, if you've got nothing to hide, why worry? Except for the fact that, courtesy of almost everything we do being either "illegal" or at least "suspicious" we all have a great deal to hide. The naivety of the Don't Worry, it's No Big Deal crowd is breathtaking. Did the average Soviet citizen also "not have anything to hide," and hence why worry?

But the last possibility is probably the creepiest possibility: EDRs tied into your car's GPS will give them – the government and its corporate **** ******* (edited for language) – literal physical control over (hack) "your" vehicle. This is not conspiracy theorizing. It is technological fact. Current GM vehicles equipped with the same technology about to be mandated for every vehicle can be disabled remotely. Just turned off. All the OnStar operator has to do is send the appropriate command over the GPS to your car's computer, which controls the engine. It is one of the features touted by OnStar – of course, as a "safety" feature.

In the future, it will be used to limit your driving – for the sake of "energy conservation" or perhaps, "the environment." It will be the perfect, er, vehicle, for implementing U.N. Agenda 21 – the plan to herd all of us formerly free-range tax cattle into urban feedlots. So much easier to control us this way. No more bailing out to the country or living off the grid – unless you get there (and to your work) by walking.

Even when you are sitting at home you are still being watched and monitored in countless ways.

For example, every single call you make on your cell phone is intercepted and monitored by the government.

Your Internet activity is tracked and monitored by a whole host of government agencies as well.  If you doubt this, just read this article.

Now CISPA would expand government surveillance of the Internet even further.  The following description of CISPA comes from the Electronic Frontier Foundation website....

CISPA creates an exception to all privacy laws to permit companies to share our information with each other and with the government in the name of cybersecurity…. CISPA's 'information sharing' regime allows the transfer of vast amounts of data, including sensitive information like internet use history or the content of emails, to any agency in the government including military and intelligence agencies like the National Security Agency or the Department of Defense Cyber Command. Once in government hands, this information can be used for any non-regulatory purpose so long as one significant purpose is for cybersecurity or to protect national security.

Frightening stuff, eh?

I want you to imagine a scenario for a moment.  Imagine that the government assigned two "watchers" to you that followed you everywhere you went and stared directly into your face the entire time.

Would you feel comfortable?

Why not?

You don't have anything to hide, do you?

Well, of course the truth is that none of us would like having our privacy constantly invaded.  It is not pleasant to constantly feel like you are being watched.

That is why all of these new "security measures" are so alarming.  A system is being set up where all of us are being constantly watched and monitored 24 hours a day.

And most Americans have no idea how fast the transition to full martial law could potentially be.

Barack Obama recently updated an old executive order that has been around for decades that would enable him to take charge of all food, all energy, all health resources and all transportation resources in the United States with the stroke of a pen. This new update would allow him to do it even in "non-emergency" situations.

The following is what U.S. Representative Kay Granger recently had to say about this executive order....

This means all of our water resources, construction services and materials (steel, concrete, etc.), our civil transportation system, food and health resources, our energy supplies including oil and natural gas – even farm equipment – can be taken over by the President and his cabinet secretaries.  The Government can also draft U.S. citizens into the military and force U.S. citizens to fulfill "labor requirements" for the purposes of "national defense."  There is not even any Congressional oversight, only briefings are required.

Later on in her letter, Representative Granger even used the phrases "martial law" and "government takeover" to describe the power that Barack Obama potentially has under this executive order....

It is still unclear why this order was signed now, and what the consequences are for our nation – especially during times of peace.  This type of Martial Law imposes a government takeover on U.S. citizens that is typically reserved for national emergencies, not in a time of relative peace.

Do you trust Barack Obama with that kind of power?

Unfortunately, considering the really bad decisions that all of our government officials regularly make, it is really hard to trust any of them to do the right thing at this point.

The American people need to let their voices be heard on these issues.  If not, the federal government will continue to strip away our privacy, our liberties and our freedoms until everything is gone.

Do you want your children to grow up in a country that has been turned into a giant prison camp and that more closely resembles North Korea than it does the nation that our forefathers originally founded?

If not, please do what you can to speak out against these abuses.

The truth is that the federal government does not really even care about our national security anyway.

If they did, they would secure our borders. Just today I read that the National Guard is withdrawing 900 troops from the U.S.-Mexico border.  Our border security is already a total joke and now it is going to be even worse.

Over the past several decades, tens of millions of people have crossed that border illegally.  Every single day, terrorists, drug dealers, gang members, sexual predators and a whole host of other "bad guys" could be crossing that border and we would never even know about it because we aren't doing anything to stop it.

For nearly 60 years, the U.S. government has successfully protected the border between South Korea and North Korea, but the U.S. government flatly refuses to protect our own borders.

Until the federal government decides to do what the U.S. Constitution requires them to do and start protecting our borders, then the federal government should not be asking any of us to make a single sacrifice in the name of "security".

The truth is that we can have a reasonable level of security in this nation without giving up the liberties and the freedoms that millions of Americans have shed their blood to protect.

We do not need to turn the United States into a giant prison camp.  America is supposed to be the land of the free, and we need to work hard to get that dream back.

.

 
 


Gold and Silver Disaggregated COT Report (DCOT) for April 27

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 02:19 PM PDT

from Got Gold Report:

HOUSTON — This week's Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) disaggregated commitments of traders (DCOT) report was released at 15:30 ET Friday. Our recap of the changes in weekly positioning by the disaggregated trader classes, as compiled by the CFTC, is just below. This week we also include the graphs and changes for the combined commercial net short positioning or LCNS, the "Legacy COT" report.

In the DCOT table below a net short position shows as a negative figure in red. A net long position shows in black. In the Change column, a negative number indicates either an increase to an existing net short position or a reduction of a net long position. A black figure in the Change column indicates an increase to an existing long position or a reduction of an existing net short position. The way to think of it is that black figures in the Change column are traders getting "longer" and red figures are traders getting less long or shorter.

Read More @ GotGoldReport.com


Silver Acts Industrial in an Uncertain Market

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 01:21 PM PDT

by Michelle Smith, Silver Investing News:

The Shanghai Gold exchange increased margin requirements, but as with COMEX silver margin decreases, the changes appear to have had little immediate effect. Silver seems to be nestling further into its physical commodity personality lately and is showing it by reacting to news that has implications for its industrial demand. And given the economic environment, there is a growing camp that believes the bears could be set to gain ground.

A prime example of silver trading like classic physical commodities is the severe negative reaction the metal had to Flash PMI manufacturing data that showed weakness in Europe and China. This news prompted a terrible start to the week as prices on Monday fell to the lowest levels seen since January 20.

Read More @ SilverInvestingNews.com


Why The Euro Is So Strong, Or Why The Market Expects $700bn Of Fed QE3

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 01:15 PM PDT

The question puzzling currency markets is why the EUR is so strong.  While we have argued that during the risk-off period of the last month or so post-LTRO2 (before Tuesday) EURUSD strength appeared to be driven by repatriation flows and balance sheet reduction, new information over the last couple of weeks driving the expectation that growth will be weak enough in the US to keep US policy very stimulative for a nice long time, we tend to agree with Steven Englander of Citigroup who argues that it looks very much as if QE3/Fed-stimulus anticipations are behind the EUR relative strength recently. Indeed the recent USD weakness is pretty much across the board, suggesting that it is less EUR attractiveness than USD unattractiveness that is driving the EUR's gains.  That said, I think the buzz around various euro zone measures to help out banks and ease the rigidities of the fiscal compact is also helping support the EUR by reducing tail risk, but right now the USD/Fed is the bigger story. Back of the envelope math based on the Fed/ECB balance sheets and EURUSD implies the market expects around $700bn of QE3 and given swap-spread differentials there appears to be little liquidity premium to reduce this expectation.

The current EURUSD rate implies a Fed/ECB ratio of around 1.2x which infers that the market expects around $700bn of liquidity from the Fed relative to the ECB in the short-run...

And there is little additional liquidity premium (over interest rate differential models) as swap-spreads and EURUSD begin to correlated more highly and also with risk...

 

Consider first the evidence that the EUR is positively correlated with risk (Figure 1). 

The chart above presents the euro's beta on changes in other measures of risk appetite. The chart is scaled so that a positive value shows a risk-positive correlated and we use two-day changes to mitigate the impact of different closing times in different markets.  What it shows is that the underlying correlation of the euro with risk is positive. It is not clear why this is the case, although I would argue that a risk-positive environment makes investors more willing to tolerate tail risk than a risk off environment and the reserves accumulation/diversification cycle probably is more intense when risk is on.  Investors may be wrong in trading the EUR with a positive risk correlation but it is hard to argue that they do not do so.

Now consider the charts below. In each case the blue line represents the S&P, the yellow line US two year yields and the green line EUR. What we see are episodes in March/April; 2009 and Aug/Sep 2010 when US 2 year yields fell and the S&P rallied.  Presumably these are period when growth was disappointing (i.e. investors drop their expectations of policy rate hikes) but equity markets and the EUR rally because the low rates support valuations even in a low top-line growth environment. As a colleague expressed it, even a tiny stream of returns is worth a lot when the discount factor is close to zero.  So we have a series of episodes in which risk is bid, and the euro with it, despite economic disappointment.

Now consider Figure 4 which shows the most recent moves in 2yr yields,the S&P and the EUR.  We see a similar pattern – 2yr yields drifting down and the S&P and EUR running up. The scale of the rallies is not as big as in the other episodes but the family resemblance is there. For the USD risk-on is a negative and low rates are a negative, and that is what the market is focused on.

Now consider Figure 5 below which presents the EUR, the S&P and 2yr Treasury yields from 2009 to the present (hard as it is to believe that 2yr Treasuries were yielding 0.80% just over a year ago). The big picture is that the recovery has disappointed everyone except investors.  Going back to 2009 and even early 2011,  the fixed income market thought there was an imminent recovery that would enable the Fed to tighten – since mid-2011 that expectation has disappeared.  The trend in equity prices suggests that there has been a stream of surprises either top-line on expected profits, or in terms of the rate used to discount this stream of returns.  The low discount factor to be applied to the expected stream of profits may have been especially important over the last couple of quarters when profit growth has eased.

Bottom line for the last three years is that risk appetite can be positive on the whole, even with disappointing economic performance and this positive risk appetite and asset market environment supports the euro. From Figure 4 it is clear that the degree to which the EUR is positively correlated with risk diminished in H2 2011 when the sovereign debt crisis spread to Italy and Spain.  However, no correlation that we run with respect to any indicator of risk (US S&P,  EM MSCI, VIXC etc)shows a negative correlation of the euro and risk – the correlations show a diminished but still positive beta (back to Figure 1) and this is true whether the correlations are over shorter or longer spans.

 

Putting this together we have a currency that is risk positive through tail risk shrinkage when risk appetite is strong and a Fed that supports asset markets via low rates, despite disappointing economic asset market performance. It adds up to a weak euro when risk is off and investors do not yet anticipate a policy response and a stronger euro when the policy response arrives (carrying with it extremely unattractive yields in US asset markets).

What can go wrong?  It seems to me that the market bias to buying EUR in periods of risk appetite can easily disappear if it looks as if European policymakers have lost control over the euro crisis.  I would stress that  recent experience suggests that investors do not care much how the euro zone deals with the tail risk as long as they find a mechanism for doing so.  If not the euro and the euro zone could easily fall.  It is also the case that if the euro situation becomes sufficiently dire, there will be a negative global impact both on activity and risk appetite. Our betas may not change but we can have positive betas as asset markets collapse, as easily as when they rise. To be sure the Fed has not announced, let alone implemented, an additional easing round so it is possible that the new found positive asset market environment will fade, taking the euro down with it.

Net, net I would argue that the new information over the last couple of weeks is the expectation that growth will be weak enough in the US to keep US policy  very stimulative for a nice long time. Whether you like it or not, the euro remains sufficiently correlated with risk for this to be a plus.

As a footnote, earlier this week, I presented some evidence that in H2 2012, balancing sheet cutting and repatriation of foreign assets may have also helped the euro. The two explanations are not necessarily inconsistent, but I would argue that in a positive risk environment the dominant factor would be investors risk appetite, provided that the sovereign debt crisis was not in an acute stage. 


Eric Sprott and David Baker: When fundamentals no longer apply, review the fundamentals

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 01:10 PM PDT

9p ET Friday, April 27, 2012

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

The U.S. and European economies are still sinking, money is rushing out of Spain's banking system, and demand for physical gold is exploding and will blow up the paper gold market before long, Eric Sprott and David Baker of Sprott Asset Management write today in the company's "Markets at a Glance" commentary. Sprott and Baker write:

"We have written at length about the disconnect between the paper gold price and the physical gold market. If the demand changes stated above applied to any other market, the investing public would lose their minds. Could you imagine, for example, if the demand shifts described above were applied to the global oil market? What would happen if a single country came in from nowhere and increased its oil purchases by a factor equivalent to 30% of the world's annual oil supply? We are students first and foremost of the physical market, and the numbers stated above speak for themselves. We remain confident about gold for the simple reason that the demand we are now seeing for physical is completely unsustainable without higher prices, and we do not see that demand abating in the coming months."

The Sprott-Baker commentary is headlined "When Fundamentals No Longer Apply, Review the Fundamentals" and it's posted at the Sprott Internet site here:

http://www.sprott.com/markets-at-a-glance/when-fundamentals-no-longer-ap...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Golden Phoenix Discusses Royalty Mining Growth Strategy
on '21st Century Business' on Fox Business Network

Golden Phoenix Minerals Inc. has discussed its royalty mining growth strategy on the Fox Business Network program "21st Century Business" with host Jackie Bales. Golden Phoenix's director of corporate communications, Robert Ian, told how the company narrows its focus to project generation and future royalty streams. He explained why Golden Phoenix believes it's better to own joint-venture interests in several producing mines instead of full exposure to just one project.

"21st Century Business" has been airing for 15 years. Previous hosts have included Gen. Alexander Haig, Gen.l Norman Schwarzkopf, and Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Golden Phoenix appeared as paid programming on this broadcast.

To view the program with Golden Phoenix, please visit Golden Phoenix's Internet site here:

http://www.goldenphoenix.us/company-videos.html



Join GATA here:

Las Vegas Money Show
Caesar's Palace, Las Vegas
Monday-Thursday, May 14-17, 2012
http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/las_vegas/moneyshow/

Committee for Monetary Research and Education
Spring Dinner Meeting
"Money and the Corporate State"
Union League Club, New York, N.Y.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
http://www.cmre.org/

Vancouver World Resource Investment Conference
Sunday-Monday, June 3-4, 2012
Vancouver Convention Centre East
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
http://www.cambridgehouse.com/event/world-resource-investment-conference

Standard Chartered's Earth Resources Conference
Wednesday-Thursday, June 20-21, 2012
J.W. Marriott, Hong Kong
http://www.standardcharteredsignatureevents.com/earths-resources/welcome...

Hong Kong Gold Investment Forum
Monday-Wednesday, June 25-27, 2012
Renaissance Harbour View Hotel, Hong Kong
http://www.hkgoldinvestmentforum.com/

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 24-27, 2012
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
New Orleans, Louisiana
http://www.neworleansconference.com/

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing DVDs of our London conference in August 2011 or our Dawson City conference in August 2006:

http://www.goldrush21.com/order.html

Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Be Part of a Chance to Discover
Multi-Million-Ounce Gold and Silver Deposits in Canada

Northaven Resources Corp. (TSX-V:NTV) is advancing five gold and silver projects in highly prospective and politically stable British Columbia, Canada.

Check out the exploration program on our Allco gold/silver project :

-- A large (13,000 hectare) property, covering more than 15 square kilometers of a regional mineralized trend just 3km from a recently announced 1.2-million-ounce gold and 15-million-ounce silver deposit.

-- The property hosts historic high-grade silver workings and many mineral showings as well as former mines at the property's northern and southern boundaries.

-- A deep-penetrating airborne geophysics survey has just been completed on the entire property and neighboring deposits and its results are eagerly awaited.

To learn more about the Allco property or Northaven's other gold and silver projects, please visit:

http://www.northavenresources.com

Or call Northaven CEO Allen Leschert at 604-696-3600.



Big commercials don't see metals going lower, Arensberg reports

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 12:54 PM PDT

8:50p ET Friday, April 27, 2012

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

In his Got Gold Report bulletin tonight, Gene Arensberg reports that the big commercial traders have greatly cut back their short positions in gold and especially in silver, indicating that they don't expect the monetary metals to move lower. Arensberg's report is headlined "Gold and Silver Disaggregated COT Report for April 27" and it's posted at the Got Gold Report's Internet site here:

http://www.gotgoldreport.com/2012/04/gold-and-silver-disaggregated-cot-r...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Be Part of a Chance to Discover
Multi-Million-Ounce Gold and Silver Deposits in Canada

Northaven Resources Corp. (TSX-V:NTV) is advancing five gold and silver projects in highly prospective and politically stable British Columbia, Canada.

Check out the exploration program on our Allco gold/silver project :

-- A large (13,000 hectare) property, covering more than 15 square kilometers of a regional mineralized trend just 3km from a recently announced 1.2-million-ounce gold and 15-million-ounce silver deposit.

-- The property hosts historic high-grade silver workings and many mineral showings as well as former mines at the property's northern and southern boundaries.

-- A deep-penetrating airborne geophysics survey has just been completed on the entire property and neighboring deposits and its results are eagerly awaited.

To learn more about the Allco property or Northaven's other gold and silver projects, please visit:

http://www.northavenresources.com

Or call Northaven CEO Allen Leschert at 604-696-3600.



Join GATA here:

Las Vegas Money Show
Caesar's Palace, Las Vegas
Monday-Thursday, May 14-17, 2012
http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/las_vegas/moneyshow/

Committee for Monetary Research and Education
Spring Dinner Meeting
"Money and the Corporate State"
Union League Club, New York, N.Y.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
http://www.cmre.org/

Vancouver World Resource Investment Conference
Sunday-Monday, June 3-4, 2012
Vancouver Convention Centre East
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
http://www.cambridgehouse.com/event/world-resource-investment-conference

Standard Chartered's Earth Resources Conference
Wednesday-Thursday, June 20-21, 2012
J.W. Marriott, Hong Kong
http://www.standardcharteredsignatureevents.com/earths-resources/welcome...

Hong Kong Gold Investment Forum
Monday-Wednesday, June 25-27, 2012
Renaissance Harbour View Hotel, Hong Kong
http://www.hkgoldinvestmentforum.com/

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 24-27, 2012
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
New Orleans, Louisiana
http://www.neworleansconference.com/

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing DVDs of our London conference in August 2011 or our Dawson City conference in August 2006:

http://www.goldrush21.com/order.html

Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Golden Phoenix Discusses Royalty Mining Growth Strategy
on '21st Century Business' on Fox Business Network

Golden Phoenix Minerals Inc. has discussed its royalty mining growth strategy on the Fox Business Network program "21st Century Business" with host Jackie Bales. Golden Phoenix's director of corporate communications, Robert Ian, told how the company narrows its focus to project generation and future royalty streams. He explained why Golden Phoenix believes it's better to own joint-venture interests in several producing mines instead of full exposure to just one project.

"21st Century Business" has been airing for 15 years. Previous hosts have included Gen. Alexander Haig, Gen.l Norman Schwarzkopf, and Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Golden Phoenix appeared as paid programming on this broadcast.

To view the program with Golden Phoenix, please visit Golden Phoenix's Internet site here:

http://www.goldenphoenix.us/company-videos.html



Empty Sack

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 12:51 PM PDT

by Andy Hoffman, MilesFranklin.com:

Forget the market machinations utilized to put lipstick on yesterday's FOMC pig, and the MSM's brain-dead "take" on Fed policy. Forget the gold plunges and Dow surges, calls for an "end to QE," and – conversely – its expansion to "INFINITY." Instead, consider what the Fed has done – and ALL Central banks throughout history – what they are doing now, and what options they have for the future.

Throughout the annuls of history, no fiat currency has ever survived – EVER. Moreover, in nearly all cases, 40 years has been the longest period before either a major devaluation or collapse has occurred. in fact, the vaunted United States has already lost two currencies, nearly three, and shortly the 41-year old post gold standard dollar. The U.S. Continental and Confederate Dollar were hyperinflated to pay for the Revolutionary War and the South's Civil War costs, while Abraham Lincoln's Greenback was within months of the same fate when the Civil War ended.

Read More @ Miles Franklin


Invest in Africa Now: Nana Sangmuah

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 12:41 PM PDT

The Gold Report: Gold consultancy GFMS, which is now owned by Thomson Reuters, recently published its 2012 Gold Survey. GFMS predicts that before the end of 2012, the yellow metal will likely reach above its all-time nominal high of $1,920/ounce (oz) in September 2011. The catalysts include inflation concerns and sovereign debt problems in Europe, especially Spain. What are your thoughts on these predictions and conclusions? Nana Sangmuah: I agree with those predictions and the drivers. One thing that has been missing from the gold rally is inflation hedge demand. With the significant monetary easing that has occurred to drive a global recovery, inflation is definitely going to be an issue at some point. We haven't seen inflation trade come into gold throughout these 10+ years. That's the strong headwind that is going to move gold to another level. TGR: The survey reported that mine production hit a record high in 2011, rising 2.8% year over year to reach 2,818 metric tons (mt). Th...


The Gold Price Broke Out and is Moving Higher Closing up 1.3 Percent for the Week at $1,664

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 11:22 AM PDT

Gold Price Close Today : 1,664.00
Gold Price Close 20-Apr : 1,642.10
Change : 21.90 or 1.3%

Silver Price Close Today : 3134.7
Silver Price Close 20-Apr : 3164.4
Change : -29.70 or -0.9%

Gold Silver Ratio Today : 53.083
Gold Silver Ratio 20-Apr : 51.893
Change : 1.19 or 2.3%

Silver Gold Ratio : 0.01884
Silver Gold Ratio 20-Apr : 0.01927
Change : -0.00043 or -2.2%

Dow in Gold Dollars : $ 164.33
Dow in Gold Dollars 20-Apr : $ 164.02
Change : $ 0.31 or 0.2%

Dow in Gold Ounces : 7.950
Dow in Gold Ounces 20-Apr : 7.935
Change : 0.02 or 0.2%

Dow in Silver Ounces : 422.00
Dow in Silver Ounces 20-Apr : 411.75
Change : 10.25 or 2.5%

Dow Industrial : 13,228.31
Dow Industrial 20-Apr : 13,029.26
Change : 199.05 or 1.5%

S&P 500 : 1,403.36
S&P 500 20-Apr : 1,378.53
Change : 24.83 or 1.8%

US Dollar Index : 78.748
US Dollar Index 20-Apr : 79.144
Change : -0.396 or -0.5%

Platinum Price Close Today : 1,570.50
Platinum Price Close 20-Apr : 1,577.40
Change : -6.90 or -0.4%

Palladium Price Close Today : 681.60
Palladium Price Close 20-Apr : 675.00
Change : 6.60 or 1.0%

Overview of the silver and
GOLD PRICE this week says that they completed those falling wedges, made final bottoms for this move, and have begun moving higher.

GOLD PRICE today rose $4.40 to $1,664.00 while silver gained 14 cents to 3134.7c. Notice that this week (a) gold never closed below $1,630 and (b) silver spent only 3 days below 3100c.

Yesterday GOLD cracked the upper boundary of that falling wedge -- "broke out" -- and confirmed that today with a higher close. Yet once burned, twice shy, so I want to see gold clear $1,682 resistance to PROVE it has turned up, then keep marching right along and climb over that 200 DMA at $1,698.17. Looks good, but I'm holding my breath. Why? Because it still might drop back to the bottom boundary of that wedge, now about $1,600.

The SILVER PRICE was taken behind the bar and beaten so bad you'd have thought she couldn't stand up. Think again. 5 Day chart shows a spike bottom on Wednesday, followed by a surge through 3060c resistance, and a continuing advance clean to 3140c.

Today SILVER closed at 3134.7c, not far from the 3142c high.

On the longer term chart silver yesterday halted at the upper boundary of that falling wedge. Today she cleared it. In front of silver -- and needful to confirm a rally -- stands 3250c.

Appears that the SILVER and GOLD PRICE made their final lows this week for the correction that began off the March high. A lot of sideways frustration will likely follow, but trending upward. Big breakouts may not come till fall, but worst has passed.

Biggest winner for the week was the S&P500, up 1.8%, with gold not far behind at 1.3%. Not surprising, dollar index lost half a percent.

If this was any sort of sane world where everybody and his brother didn't have his thumb on the scale and his hand in the till, that US dollar index would have dropped like a big boy hit on the head with a large-size pipe wrench. Rather, it broke down from its two-month-a-building triangle and jes' sorta stumbled 40 basis points (0.51%) to 78.748, instead of dropping straight down like a low-flying mallard hit with #2 shot.

Where will this take the US dollar index? It has broken support stretching back to the late October low, so "lower" is the first answer. Second, there's an internal support line right about 78.50, beneath which lies air. Doesn't seem to be any particular reason -- that is, an announcement from the Bernancubus that he's going to debase the dollar faster -- for this slide, but maybe it's the NGM working together trying to float the euro.

Speaking of the euro, how'd you like to live in Spain, where admitted (Governments always lie) unemployment is 24.4% and half the folks under 25 have no jobs? Foreclosures rising, banks sinking, deficit booming. This saith not much for the euro's future. Today it rose 0.35% to 1.3253, which carries it only to the 32.8% correction level of its November - January drop. Yes, 'tis above its nested 20, 50, and 62 day moving averages, which points it higher, but if you put a .44 magnum to my head and asked me why, I reckon you'd just have to blow my brains out cause I could give you ne'er a reason.

Yen is on a tear, rose 1.04% today to 124.7c/Y100 (Y80.19/US$1). Climbing above that 124.5-ish level will send it flying, and I reckon y'all will see that.

Some of y'all may have marked that I NEVER have anything good to say about stocks, and I confess, that's no accident. Wake up! The US is mired to the wheel wells in depression, and the only thing government and the Fed can do is haul more barrels of water to thin the mud. Some few companies may prosper, but the vast majority of the US economy will keep on suffering because the Resplendent Ones Who Run Our Lives will not allow the economy to purge bad investments and bankrupt firms. mostly because their cronies own them.

More than that, stocks entered a primary downtrend in 2000, and will not significantly exceed that inflation-adjusted 11,722 high until the bear market ends, say 3 - 10 years hence.

At present the Dow Industrials have traced out a head and shoulders that may signal on a breather, a consolidation before moving higher, or a top. If the Dow can break through 13,300 -- IF -- then it might reach for 14,905 and the government and Wall Street shills will be singing sweet halleluiahs, but 'twill be the biggest bull trap of all time, for twill collapse thereafter to ignominious lows. Teeth will gnash, wailers will wail, hair will be pulled. If the Dow breaks say 12,100 sooner, then the gnashing, wailing, and hair-pulling will start sooner. No matter, either way the gnashing, etc. will come. Wait for it, it will come.

Today the Dow rose, with great labor, to 13,228.31, up 23.69 (0.18%) while the S&P500 climbed over 1,400 to 1,403.36 (up 3.38 or 0.24%).

Y'all enjoy your weekend!

Argentum et aurum comparenda sunt -- -- Gold and silver must be bought.

- Franklin Sanders, The Moneychanger
The-MoneyChanger.com
888-218-9226
10:00am-5:00pm CST, Monday-Friday

© 2012, The Moneychanger. May not be republished in any form, including electronically, without our express permission.

To avoid confusion, please remember that the comments above have a very short time horizon. Always invest with the primary trend. Gold's primary trend is up, targeting at least $3,130.00; silver's primary is up targeting 16:1 gold/silver ratio or $195.66; stocks' primary trend is down, targeting Dow under 2,900 and worth only one ounce of gold; US$ or US$-denominated assets, primary trend down; real estate bubble has burst, primary trend down.

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER. Be advised and warned:

Do NOT use these commentaries to trade futures contracts. I don't intend them for that or write them with that short term trading outlook. I write them for long-term investors in physical metals. Take them as entertainment, but not as a timing service for futures.

NOR do I recommend investing in gold or silver Exchange Trade Funds (ETFs). Those are NOT physical metal and I fear one day one or another may go up in smoke. Unless you can breathe smoke, stay away. Call me paranoid, but the surviving rabbit is wary of traps.

NOR do I recommend trading futures options or other leveraged paper gold and silver products. These are not for the inexperienced.

NOR do I recommend buying gold and silver on margin or with debt.

What DO I recommend? Physical gold and silver coins and bars in your own hands.

One final warning: NEVER insert a 747 Jumbo Jet up your nose. No, I don't.


Madrid cries for help – is anyone listening?

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 10:23 AM PDT

27-Apr (Financial Times) — When Mariano Rajoy was elected prime minister of Spain last autumn, it looked like a silver lining had appeared in the dark clouds over the eurozone. Despite his repeated support for austerity, Mr Rajoy had sent the people of Spain a message of hope for the future. His big election win suggested significant popular support for his reform agenda.

Five months on, this sense of hopefulness has all but disappeared in Madrid. With unemployment approaching 25 per cent and yields on 10-year bond rates stuck near 6 per cent, politicians' rhetoric has changed too. Speaking on the radio this week, the foreign minister, José Manuel García-Margallo, admitted the government's near-despair when he said that "Spain is undergoing a crisis of enormous proportions".

[source]


Michael Krieger On The Rebirth Of Barter

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 09:46 AM PDT

Via Michael Krieger of 'A Lightning War For Liberty' blog,

Justice in the hands of the powerful is merely a governing system like any other. Why call it justice? Let us rather call it injustice, but of a sly effective order, based entirely on cruel knowledge of the resistance of the weak, their capacity for pain, humiliation and misery.
- Georges Bernanos
(1888-1948)

 

Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded.
- Senator William Jenner
(1908-1985) U.S. Senator (IN-R)

 

The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund.
- Government of Morocco
April, 1994   Source: New York Times, full page ad by the government of Morocco

 

The Rebirth of Barter
One of the most important articles I have read this week comes from Forbes contributor Gordon Chang.  In it he states that China is preparing to avoid U.S. sanctions on Iran by paying for oil with gold.  Not only that but he also mentions that China has already been bartering with Iran to get a hold of petroleum.  He states:

So how can Beijing keep both Iran's ayatollahs and President Obama happy at the same time?  Simple, the Chinese can avoid the U.S. sanctions through barter.  China has already been trading its produce for Iran's petroleum, but there is only so much gai lan and bok choy the Iranians can eat.  That's why Iran is also accepting, among other goods, Chinese washing machines, refrigerators, toys, clothes, cosmetics, and toiletries.

 

The barter trade works, but Iran needs cash too.  As it is being cut off from the global financial system, the next best thing is gold.  So we should not be surprised that in late February the Iranian central bank said it would accept that metal as payment for oil.   Last year, China imported $21.7 billion in Iranian oil and exported $14.8 billion in goods and services.  As the NDAA goes into effect, look for Beijing to ship gold to Iran to make up the difference.

Thus, the leadership in America in its infinite stupidity has actually accelerated the demise of the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency.  After its "kinetic action" in Libya succeeded in toppling the regime there, Washington's geopolitical hubris grew and it has attempted to muscle Iran into a corner.  Instead, all it has done is alienated our "allies" that need Iranian oil to survive and in the process quickened a move away from the dollar to settle certain transactions.  Read Gordon's article here.

In a similar move on a more micro level, the government of Spain in a similar desperation has banned the use of cash transactions above 2,500 euros (read this great article here on it).  How do you think citizens are going to respond to this?  People are already in the streets.  They are not pleased with what is going on.  Then the government is going to tell them they can't use cash amongst themselves so that the authorities can track every single thing they do and bleed them with taxes until they are slaves on a banker plantation.  Everything is going to go black market and to a barter system.  It will happen country by country as governments get increasingly desperate and the authoritarian clamp down continues.  It will happen on an increasing level until all of these house of cards bureaucratic states fail and something new is reborn.  In case you haven't seen it yet, this one town in Greece is already leading the way. This story outlines what will be a mega trend globally over the next decade.


Jim Sinclair Has Something to Say – Q&A From The May Issue of Futures Magazine

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 09:22 AM PDT

Jim Sinclair Has Something to Say -Q&A from the May issue of Futures magazine By Daniel P. Collins April 27, 2012 •

Jim Sinclair is not simply a gold bug; he successfully has called every major move in the precious metal — both up and down — over a generation. But he

Continue reading Jim Sinclair Has Something to Say – Q&A From The May Issue of Futures Magazine


John Williams: Recovery faked by phony government numbers

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 09:19 AM PDT

5:15p ET Friday, April 27, 2012

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Writing at King World News, ShadowStats editor John Williams argues that evidence of economic recovery in the United States turns bogus when government-doctored inflation data is discarded and real inflation data is used. Williams predicts that more debt monetization will be employed to prop up banks while being portrayed as economic stimulus. Williams' comments are headlined "The Recovery Faked by Phony Government Numbers" and it's posted at the King World News blog here:

http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/4/27_Jo...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Be Part of a Chance to Discover
Multi-Million-Ounce Gold and Silver Deposits in Canada

Northaven Resources Corp. (TSX-V:NTV) is advancing five gold and silver projects in highly prospective and politically stable British Columbia, Canada.

Check out the exploration program on our Allco gold/silver project :

-- A large (13,000 hectare) property, covering more than 15 square kilometers of a regional mineralized trend just 3km from a recently announced 1.2-million-ounce gold and 15-million-ounce silver deposit.

-- The property hosts historic high-grade silver workings and many mineral showings as well as former mines at the property's northern and southern boundaries.

-- A deep-penetrating airborne geophysics survey has just been completed on the entire property and neighboring deposits and its results are eagerly awaited.

To learn more about the Allco property or Northaven's other gold and silver projects, please visit:

http://www.northavenresources.com

Or call Northaven CEO Allen Leschert at 604-696-3600.



Join GATA here:

Las Vegas Money Show
Caesar's Palace, Las Vegas
Monday-Thursday, May 14-17, 2012
http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/las_vegas/moneyshow/

Committee for Monetary Research and Education
Spring Dinner Meeting featuring Jim Sinclair
"Money and the Corporate State"
Union League Club, New York, N.Y.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
http://www.cmre.org/

Vancouver World Resource Investment Conference
Sunday-Monday, June 3-4, 2012
Vancouver Convention Centre East
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
http://www.cambridgehouse.com/event/world-resource-investment-conference

Standard Chartered's Earth Resources Conference
Wednesday-Thursday, June 20-21, 2012
J.W. Marriott, Hong Kong
http://www.standardcharteredsignatureevents.com/earths-resources/welcome...

Hong Kong Gold Investment Forum
Monday-Wednesday, June 25-27, 2012
Renaissance Harbour View Hotel, Hong Kong
http://www.hkgoldinvestmentforum.com/

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 24-27, 2012
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
New Orleans, Louisiana
http://www.neworleansconference.com/

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing DVDs of our London conference in August 2011 or our Dawson City conference in August 2006:

http://www.goldrush21.com/order.html

Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Golden Phoenix Discusses Royalty Mining Growth Strategy
on '21st Century Business' on Fox Business Network

Golden Phoenix Minerals Inc. has discussed its royalty mining growth strategy on the Fox Business Network program "21st Century Business" with host Jackie Bales. Golden Phoenix's director of corporate communications, Robert Ian, told how the company narrows its focus to project generation and future royalty streams. He explained why Golden Phoenix believes it's better to own joint-venture interests in several producing mines instead of full exposure to just one project.

"21st Century Business" has been airing for 15 years. Previous hosts have included Gen. Alexander Haig, Gen.l Norman Schwarzkopf, and Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Golden Phoenix appeared as paid programming on this broadcast.

To view the program with Golden Phoenix, please visit Golden Phoenix's Internet site here:

http://www.goldenphoenix.us/company-videos.html



The Most Important Development Since The MSM/MOPE Assault On Euroland Began

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 09:17 AM PDT

My Dear Extended Family, Do not discount this. It has the potential of being the most important positive development in the euro since the beginning of the USA and GB's MSM/MOPE assault on Euroland's problems. This I am told is the reason behind the Euro holding above $1.30 no matter how much the US and GB MSM/MOPE is thrown at it. This is another economic war taking place under the radar of the sheeple between the USA and GB on one side and Euroland on the other. Russia and China might make the euro their reserve currency of selection if Hollande can pull off this plan. I might go to France to vote for him twice. He knows what the euro's real problem is and will work to cure it. This is extremely important in the dollar equation. It may be the most important swing factor in the political scene of gold and the US dollar. Hollande could be the political figure of this century for the upcoming euro block. It is possible. Do not discount this. Resp...


A Return To Real Money

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 09:11 AM PDT

from Gold Seek:

As a general rule, the most successful man in life is the man who has the best information.

On the night of November 22, 1910 a delegation of the nation's leading financiers, led by Senator Nelson Aldrich, left New Jersey for a very secret ten day meeting on Jekyll Island, Georgia.

After the Jekyll Island visit the National Monetary Commission wrote the Aldrich Plan which formed the basis for the Federal Reserve system.

After several failed attempts to push the Federal Reserve Act through Congress, a group of bankers funded and staffed Woodrow Wilson's campaign for President.

Read More @ GoldSeek.com


Good News - the Impending Gold & Silver Launch

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 09:10 AM PDT

Deepcaster


Should We Kill The Politicians Before They Kill Us?

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 08:56 AM PDT

Should We Kill The Politicians Before They Kill Us?

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers." William Shakespeare, Henry the Sixth

That was four hundred years ago, long before lawyers would come to hold most elected offices. 41% of the current congress are lawyers, six times the rate of the general population. The greatest concentration of lawyers is in Washington, D.C., and that is turning out to be a very bad thing.

This could well be the most sinister article I have ever written. We are sitting ducks. Easy prey. We are naive and easy to manipulate.

Groggy and sloggy on high fructose corn syrup. Corpulent and congested by pink slime beef and other toxins marketed as food, we ain't gonna put up much of a fight.

Even if we could, they are ready and waiting for us. With their LRAD noise cannons, drones, armored vehicles, chemical weapons, Active Denial Systems and all of the right stuff to start offing citizens in large numbers.

To illustrate, I found this in Top 10 Future Law Enforcement Technologies by Amy Miller. As you read this, remember that this was three years ago.

"Has a chicken breast ever gone into a microwave oven without an absolute massacre being the end result? The ADS system (Active Denial System) aims to do the same thing to pesky rioters, high risk threats, and otherwise heavily shielded and protected targets.

High frequency targeted microwaves are projected at an offender sparking a reaction in the water carrying molecules and fatty tissues, causing the target to heat up from the inside out. Immediately, the target is unable to continue in the same fashion as before, they are in immense pain, and too uncomfortable to continue as a threat. It provides a biological reaction in the body, incapacitating the target and rendering them effectively useless for a longer period of time than other non-lethal methods."

Non-lethal? Maybe, but the first degree burns it produces make it the modern day equivalent of pouring burning oil on them. Does hell have a special place for people who think this stuff up? A chicken breast in a microwave? That's all we are to them.

I guess the Occupy movement is cooked.

But wait, there's more…..

Homeland Security just bought 450 million rounds of .40 caliber ammunition. That is not a typo—450 million rounds. That is enough to shoot every American 1.5 times. These, we are told, are to protect us from a very large, well organized threat for which no plausible evidence exists.

Further, due to the destructive force of the expansion of the bullet, hollow-points are prohibited in international warfare, so they can only be used on us.

There are just us and them…and a few Middle Eastern crazies, straight from central casting, that they trot out from time to time to try to make us believe that all of this is for our own good.

The truth is that the only well-armed organized terrorists preparing to come into our communities will be sent by our politicians. If this is how they plan to handle unemployment and poverty domestically, it is hard to envision a time when any sort of even modest global accord could be achieved. Peace on earth? Yeah, good luck with that.

Meanwhile, they've been fine tuning the Constitution more to their liking by eliminating the first, fourth, fifth, and fourteenth amendments with the argument that times have changed and surely our founding fathers would want us to bring this quaint, pre-terrorism list of suggestions up to date.

I think that the only thing our founding fathers might have wanted is for us to have fought harder. Now it might be too late.

On New Year's Eve, while nobody was looking, the president signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act, which for the first time in American history, makes legal the practice of apprehending and detaining, without writ or warrant, any American citizen, indefinitely, without trial.

It is based on a relatively new concept in law that all that is needed is the mere suspicion that an individual is thinking about breaking the law in order to arrest and detain them. I recently heard a government official defend it by asking the rhetorical question, "Well, if we think a crime is about to be committed, you would want us to prevent it?"

Never mind the Constitution, the presumption of innocence, or the right to due process.

As more and more Americans are discovering, if you try to stand up against the system in even a civil matter, you can wind up being jailed.

Except for a handful of brave judges, the vast majority of the judiciary has sold out. They, too, go on to great paying jobs with the law firms they favor in their rulings.

So, if one of those 450 million DHS hollow points doesn't find you, than you might be one of those intended for a FEMA camp or a jail cell.

Meet the prison industrial complex; possibly the greatest single benefactor of our trumped up war of terror. Just ask Wells Fargo, a major investor. They know a sure thing when they see it.

Politicians keep telling us that crime is down, so who are they putting in all these prisons?

In 1980, there were two hundred and twenty people incarcerated for every hundred thousand Americans; by 2010, the number had more than tripled, to seven hundred and thirty-one. No other country even approaches that. In the past two decades, the money that states spend on prisons has risen at six times the rate of spending on higher education.

Remember the old saying, "You get what you pay for"? The education a child gets determines their fate. If we spend way more on prisons than we do on education, the results are predictable and the results speak for themselves. We are "Prison Nation".

The US has 5% of the world's population and 25% of the worlds incarcerated. Either we are some seriously bad-ass, mother-fuckers or something is very, very wrong. Ironically, the US also has 66% of the world's lawyers serving 5% of the world's population. I'm not sure what that suggests.

The prison business approaches a community desperate for jobs and commerce, and offers to build and operate a prison with local resources; but, there's just one little catch—the community has to keep the prison full.

Recently, Corrections Corporation of America offered to buy and operate existing state prisons. Their offer requires the states to guarantee 90 percent occupancy.

Now, anyone and everyone is a potential customer for the local gray bar motel.

Within the last year, four different people I know were arrested and jailed while appearing in court on civil matters—not criminal, but civil.

Last year 40,000 new laws were passed in the US. Can you list them all? See how ridiculous it is becoming? That's what you get when you have two thirds of the world's lawyers.

FEMA camps, for real or paranoid lunatic nonsense?

All that I can verify is that the "emergency camps" have been put out to contractors for bid.

On February 24, 2012, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) posted the final draft solicitation for what they are calling a National Responder Support Camp (NRSC).

You can read it for yourself. My general impression is that particulars of the camps, as defined in the request for bid, are intended to have two separate groups residing at the camps for a long period of time. Ten percent of the group will live in additional secured quarters and receive better amenities than the other ninety percent of residents.

That scenario would suggest more of a prison environment than a short-term aid facility operated by members of the community. The camps would need to be operational in 72 hours. Though the request for bids suggest staffing with local labor, it concedes that under such short notice, local residents might not be able to respond so staff would be brought from other areas. They'll be the ones in the crisp, brown shirts.

The locations of the camps have already been picked. Awesome! It appears that our ever forward-looking leaders already know where the next big disasters will be. Comforting, very comforting.

Meanwhile, a devastating disaster is already upon us and no one is responding to that.

For people who lost their homes to crooked banking schemes or a natural disaster, the result is the same.

This, despite the fact we spend a fortune on Governments who do little more than act as a conduit for the syphoning off of middle class prosperity.

They submit a budget, and then they overspend it.

Given unrestricted ability to do whatever they want without any interference from citizens or fiscal restraints you would think they must be doing a great job for us, but exactly the opposite is the case.

They suck. They are absolutely terrible at what they do. There must be a requirement to work in the government that you have absolutely no common sense whatsoever.

Take a look.

In the years since 9/11, we have learned that the attacks might have been prevented if US "intelligence" agencies had shared information.

Experts had issued urgent warnings about the levees protecting New Orleans years before Katrina.

The very name Katrina has become synonomous with "cluster-fuck", because of the incompetence of FEMA's response, and the fact that little has improved in New Orleans since.

The occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan have been grim reminders of why we should not go to war.

Marked by general implementation failures by U.S. agencies and evidence of massive corruption, Iraq and Afghanistan will be this generations Vietnam, right down to the lingering social costs including drug abuse and homelessness.

Military procurement systems are, according to retired military leaders, so broken that they now jeopardize national security. According to them, the U.S. is buying armaments that are overpriced, unneeded, and technically defective.

What about the economy? How has lowering taxes and eliminating or failing to enforce regulations benefited the economy? Well, the rich got way richer and the middle class got wiped out.

Let's take a moment to evaluate and grade the performance of some important agencies.

  1. 1. The Government Services Administration, GSA

Since they are currently in the news, I thought why not start with them. The GSA is an important agency because it is the procurement arm for the entire Federal Government except the military. They buy stuff; lots of stuff. Everything you could imagine and some stuff you couldn't.

Obviously, there is a potential for relationships to develop between vendors and buyers. Budda-bing, budda-bang, budda-boom, if you get my drift.

Why, heck, if you didn't have the right people in this agency they could be buying $900 toilet seats, taking kickbacks, and wasting the tax payer's money on themselves in a manor so lavish and arrogant that it would create corruption in all directions.

So, when news surfaced of the GSAs Caligula like event in Vegas, it struck me as rather ironic that these are the people responsible for booking all government travel, so this goes to the very core of what they do.

GSA Grade: F

  1. 2. The Food and Drug Administration, FDA

When it comes to public health and safety, no agency is more vital than the agency responsible for protecting Americans from the potential dangers of bad drugs and poisonous food. Everyone eats food, and in this country, almost everyone takes prescribed medication.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) found that contaminated food products are so common that Americans suffer 76 million illnesses, 325,000 hospitalizations, and 5000 deaths every year. That frightening number means that one of every four Americans will suffer a food-related illness in the next 12 months.

Do not put that in your mouth. Salmonella in the sushi, E-coli in the chicken, pink slime beef.

The agency did not require any testing of Genetically Modified Organisms GMOs before approving their sale to the American public.

Irradiation is now a common method of extending shelf-life. It destroys a large proportion of the nutrients in food, a problem that is compounded as food sits out its increased shelf-life. Cooking escalates the problem further still. The end result is empty-calorie food that could actually increase nutritional deficiencies. No wonder everybody is fat and hungry.

So much for the food, what about the drugs?

Vioxx, Bextra, Baycol, Zellnorm and 27 other drugs have been withdrawn since 1980 due to serious, often fatal side effects.

The abuse of prescription medication is America's largest and among the most costly of our health problems.

FDA Grade: FF

  1. 3. The Environmental Protection Agency, EPA

Don't drink the water and don't breathe the air. The medications are now showing up in ever increasing quantities in our drinking water.

On April 8th, the EPA rejected a petition to ban the sale of the 2,4-D pesticide, a major ingredient in the Vietnam-era defoliant 'Agent Orange'. Dow Chemical, is hoping to receive approval to sell genetically modified corn seeds that will dramatically increase the usage of 2,4-D.

In defending its decision, the EPA pointed to a study conducted by Dow. That's good enough for me.

The Center for Food Safety said this, "This novel corn will foster resistant weeds that require more toxic pesticides to kill, followed by more resistance and more pesticides - a chemical arms race in which the only winners are pesticide/biotechnology firms."

So who is right? We need look no further than Monsanto's GMO corn which is experiencing massive crop failures and developing mutated and resistant insects as a result of its widespread usage. Innocuous as this may seem, it is irrefutable evidence of the potential for worldwide crop failure if we keep tinkering with Mother Nature.

Meanwhile the FDA has become the primary foe of organic growers and natural food co-ops.

And, you were worried about Al Qaeda.

EPA Grade: FFF

  1. 4. Agencies Policing the Financial Services Industry

There are a host of agencies policing the financial services industry including, but not limited to, the SEC, the OCC, the FTC, the IRS, the FBI and the DOJ.

Under their watchful eyes, banks morphed into global money sucking machines that vacuumed up every dollar they could while all of the above stood around and said "duh."

Not a single one of them sought to find out why Credit Default Swaps had soared from nearly zero in 2000 to an estimated $60 trillion in 2008, or how Derivatives, investments that have no value of their own, could grow to six times the value of everything on the planet.

SEC, FBI and all the financial watchdog agencies are the Mr. Magoos of law enforcement.

Grade: FFFF

  1. 5. The Department of Health and Human Services 

Our system for financing the costly federal health care system subsidizes the overuse of advanced technologies while underfinancing highly effective and lower-cost public health measures. Here again, the results speak for themselves.

More money per person is spent on health care in the USA than in any other nation in the world, and a greater percentage of total income is spent on health care in the USA than in any United Nations member except for East Timor. Is there a West Timor?

Yet, The Commonwealth Fund ranked the United States last in the quality of health care among similar countries. The USA is the only wealthy, industrialized nation that does not ensure that all citizens have coverage.

The U.S. Census Bureau reported that a record 50.7 million Americans—16.7% of the population—were uninsured in 2009.

The consequences are real. We are 48th in life expectancy, below most developed nations and some developing nations. The World Health Organization (WHO) ranked the U.S. health care system as the highest in cost, 37th in overall performance, and 72nd by overall level of health among 191 member nations included in the study.

A 2009 Harvard study estimated that 44,800 excess deaths occurred annually due to lack of health insurance.

Fifty percent of all bankruptcies are due to medical expenses.

Department of Health and Human Services: Grade: FFFFF

  1. 6. Department of Energy

Some of the most profitable of all corrupt activities involve energy. Remember Dick Cheney's secret energy meetings? Those led directly to electricity deregulation scams, corporate welfare for energy producers, fracking, the BP oil spill, gas pipeline explosions, high gas prices, faulty nuclear reactors, and an unreliable grid.

  1. 7. Department of Housing and Urban Development

One word…Detroit.

More and more American cities are starting to look like Detroit.

This is what our money bought. Our infrastructure is in desperate condition. Roads, bridges, rail, water, sewage systems, and many dams are in dangerous disrepair around the country. Large sections of New Orleans remain wrecked and highly vulnerable.

The DOJ sells guns to Mexican drug cartels, and launders their money while aggressively pursuing the cartels competition.

What we have today is what they want us to have. So, we get prisons, not schools. We get war, not peace. We get poverty, not prosperity. We get genetically modified organisms, not food. We get wealth for a few and misery for the masses. We get oppression, not freedom. Who did it? The politicians.

You can't vote them out because they are fungible, and the system itself prohibits most honest candidates from competing for funds. Podunk mayor and council races generate hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign spending for jobs that pay $12,000 a year.

Money now owns the system at every level.

It really is too late for voting. We still must vote or we send the message that we just don't care at all, but that won't change anything.

We have seen the enemy and we see them arming for a fight and a post-fight occupation.

Maybe you read the tea leaves differently. Maybe you think they have good intentions but really poor execution.

I read 450 million hollow points for Homeland use, an explosion of prison populations, a corrupted court system and poison everywhere as a potential threat to my right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

When they see you as a chicken breast, you know your vote matters little and your life even less.

George W. Mantor
The Real Estate Professor
Founder, American Foreclosure Resistance Movement
http://www.realtown.com/gwmantor/blog

www.4closureFraud.org


Mad Cow Futures and Silver Fundamentals

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 08:54 AM PDT

The U.S. Department of Agriculture recently confirmed the country's fourth known case of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy or BSE, which is popularly known as Mad Cow Disease. The highly publicized BSE case was discovered during a random test of a dairy cow carcass that was located at an animal rendering facility owned by Baker Commodities Inc., a business which removes dead animals from farms for processing into animal byproducts. The discovery was announced on April 23rd and was widely cited as a notable negative factor in U.S. cattle related futures, which fell sharply on the news as several countries expressed concerns about the safety of the U.S. beef and dairy industry. Deadly Mad Cow Disease Also Infects Humans Mad Cow Disease had received considerable publicity after an outbreak in the United Kingdom due to its apparent ability to be transmitted to humans and the fact that it could survive the cooking process. The disease is thought to be related to the ...


Golden Day As Stocks Slip And Silver Still Leads YTD

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 08:54 AM PDT

When even Pisani is questioning the fundamental-less QE3-addicted rally, it is perhaps self-evident that volumes were lagging today and stocks gave up most of their gains to end fractionally higher in the S&P 500 e-mini futures. Stocks peaked at the open of the US day-session after an overnight ramp that started in the depths of the overnight session (3amET) as auctions and data became so bad that traders adjusted their odds of a central-banker injection which seemed to spur wholesale buying of gold, stocks, selling of the USD (but also selling of US Treasuries - which did not fit with the QE meme). Gold continued its debasement rally after the US day-session as stocks sold back off as GDP composition weakness became clear. As we pushed into the European close, stocks rallied back to catch up with Gold's performance on the day and then sagged for a quiet low volume afternoon that saw the ES drop back below 1400, below its opening levels as Gold held above $1660. Treasuries limped around in another narrow range day ending a fraction lower in yield but off their best levels of overnight (where 10Y got down to 1.88%). Whether it is discounting Fed easing or EUR repatriation, USD weakness was broad today but JPY and AUD strength was relatively equal providing little carry-driven strength to support stocks. VIX warbled above and below 16% but ended back above as the term structure of vol continues to leak flatter. A solidly green week for stocks, accompanied by falling volumes and average trade size has seen the nominal value of the S&P 500 almost overtake Silver for best-performing asset YTD (after Silver's post LTRO2 collapse). Copper outperformed Gold and Oil on the week - though they managed to more than double the implied move from USD's weakness (-0.5% on the week). The lack of financials in today's push along with only modest energy, industrials, and materials follow through suggests investors are losing hope rather quickly with the QE chatter and the slide into the close did nothing to stay anxiety.

Just your standard 3%-plus 50 point almost-linear lower-and-lower volume melt-up in the US' broad equity index...

From 3amET, risk-assets soared as the USD was sold broadly. Gold and stocks (blue) meandered along with one another and each time stocks caught up to Gold (orange arrows), stocks leaked back...

S&P sectors have moved in a generally highly correlated, liquidity-hope-fueled way this week but lagged a little towards the end of today...

Silver's loss since LTRO2 has dragged it down to only a slight outperformer YTD as ES manages to leak higher in the last four days...

Correlations remain very noisy as QE-on and QE-off plays havoc but the week's moves in FX seem much more about USD weakness than EUR strength per se - as we try to highlight below the moves all seem very broad-based USD selling (as we suspect Fed action is being priced in over ECB or BoJ action)...

USD weakness heped gold rally but silver did not benefit as much this week and remains a decent underperformer on the week and the month...

But as our proxy for risk-assets suggests, equities seem a little full of hope right now that Ben will deliver...

 

Charts: Bloomberg


Dismal Metals Sentiment — Just What Dr. Bernanke Ordered

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 08:53 AM PDT

Since the dramatic drops the silver market saw in May and September of last year, prices in the precious metals market have been suffering from an excess of negative sentiment. This adverse perception is weighing on metal prices and keeping investor demand at bay. Furthermore, although investors have continued to buy physical silver, the overall quantity being purchased has declined significantly, resulting in reduced support for the metal's price. Nevertheless, the supply of silver is naturally limited by the quantity existing in the Earth's crust, despite ever growing industrial applications for the metal and rising price inflation. This key combination of factors still provides a strong fundamental basis for continuing to hold silver over the long term. Could Weak Silver Sentiment be Conveniently Manufactured by Central Bankers? Interestingly, this depressed silver market sentiment picture seems to be the perfect political tool needed during a U.S. election ye...


Gold and Silver Disaggregated COT Report (DCOT) for April 27

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 08:52 AM PDT

• Also this week, Legacy Combined Commercial COT (LCNS) 

HOUSTON -- This week's Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) disaggregated commitments of traders (DCOT) report was released at 15:30 ET Friday.  Our recap of the changes in weekly positioning by the disaggregated trader classes, as compiled by the CFTC, is just below.  This week we also include the graphs and changes for the combined commercial net short positioning or LCNS, the "Legacy COT" report. 

In the DCOT table below a net short position shows as a negative figure in red. A net long position shows in black. In the Change column, a negative number indicates either an increase to an existing net short position or a reduction of a net long position. A black figure in the Change column indicates an increase to an existing long position or a reduction of an existing net short position. The way to think of it is that black figures in the Change column are traders getting "longer" and red figures are traders getting less long or shorter.

All of the trader's positions are calculated net of spreading contracts as of the Tuesday disaggregated COT report.

20120427-DCOT


(DCOT Table for Friday, April 27, 2012, for data as of the close on Tuesday, April 24.   Source CFTC for COT data, Cash Market for gold and silver.) 

Continued…

Vultures, (Got Gold Report Subscribers) please note that updates to our linked technical charts, including our comments about the COT reports and the week's technical changes, should be completed by the usual time on Sunday evening (around 18:00 ET).  

As a reminder, the linked charts for gold, silver, mining shares indexes and important ratios are located in the subscriber pages.  In addition Vultures have access anytime to all 30-something Vulture Bargain (VB) and Vulture Bargain Candidates of Interest (VBCI) tracking charts – the small resource-related companies that we attempt to game here at Got Gold Report.   Continue to look for new commentary directly in the charts often. 

Combined (legacy, not disaggregated) Commercial Net Short Position for Silver, then Gold below.  Source CFTC for COT, Cash market for gold and silver. 

Combined Commercial Net Short positioning (LCNS) for silver futures (including Swap Dealers) fell a quite large 4,144 lots to a very low 22,353 contracts net short (111.8 million ounces), a reduction of 15.6% w/w, as silver declined 86-cents or 2.3% from $31.67 to $30.81 Tuesday to Tuesday.

20120427-silver-LCNS


 Actually 1,562 contracts of the decrease in commercial silver LCNS can be attributed to an increase in Swap Dealer net longs, who now report being net long 14,094 contracts (70.5 million ounces). Traders classed by the CFTC as Producer/Merchants, including bullion banks, covered or offset 2,582 lots to show 36,447 contracts net short (182.2 million ounces), which is not an "aggressive" amount of hedging historically speaking.

The LCNS as a percentage of all silver contracts open (LCNS.TO) fell to an extremely low and potentially contrary bullish 18.27% - the lowest since January 3 (14.9% then).


The LCNS for gold futures also fell by 8,854 contracts or 5% to an unusually low 167,237 contracts net short as gold edged $7.63 or 0.5% lower to $1,641.66 Tuesday to Tuesday. This, as the open interest for COMEX gold futures fell to its lowest level (395,389 contracts open) since September 1, 2009 (384,703 open then).


20120427-gold-LCNS

Note that the combined commercials (the entities whose job it is to hedge metal inventory on hand or managed for others, metal sold/bought forward, metal for delivery, metal in shipment/transit, metal anticipated to be needed and metal backing a myriad of financial derivatives), are very near their lower limits of net short positioning relative to the past three years of previous trade.

To us that suggests that the Big Hedgers are not, repeat not, positioning as though they expect gold and silver to move materially lower.  To the contrary, if the Big Hedgers thought that gold and silver were heading much lower we would expect them to be positioning for it with higher, not extremely low net short positions.  

(Edit at 19:40 CT.) Speaking of the open interest for gold futures we find it remarkable and very interesting that the COMEX open interest for gold futures has declined for eight consecutive weeks, reflecting an apparent spec migration from gold futures elsewhere.

From February 28 to April 24 the gold open interest fell 83,655 lots from 479,044 to 395,389 contracts open, a reduction of 17.5%.

20120427-Gold-openInterest

What is remarkable about that is that the price of gold has not "answered" the continued fall in the open interest in a material way.

Gold closed February 28 at $1,783.83 and fell $109.85 or 6.2% the following week to $1,673.98. The open interest plunged 35,795 contracts that week also, and has continued to decline another 47,860 lots in the seven weeks since. But instead of breaking down with the evaporating open interest in gold futures, gold has found willing bidders (likely including some central banks) above the $1,600 level. Indeed, as measured on COT reporting Tuesdays, gold has remained in a $1,640 to $1,680 trading range since March 6 as the open interest fell.

We believe that is an indication there have been and likely still are substantial and determined bidders for gold on most any significant dip. 

That is all, carry on.

Gene Arensberg for Got Gold Report  

***

 


Eric Sprott: "When Fundamentals No Longer Apply, Review the Fundamentals"

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 08:46 AM PDT

By Eric Sprott And David Baker of Sprott Asset Management

When Fundamentals No Longer Apply, Review the Fundamentals

This may not come as a surprise, but we're still not seeing it. We're not seeing a US recovery.

Here we are, well into 2012, and the fact remains that the US housing situation is still a bust. There is simply no housing recovery happening in the United States. US New Home Sales fell for the fourth time in a row month-overmonth in March, representing a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 328,000, down from 353,000 in February.1 Do you know what the annual rate of New Home Sales was back in 2006? About 1.21 million.2 No recovery there.

Same goes for US Existing Home Sales, which fell unexpectedly by 2.6% in March to an annual rate of 4.48 million units.3 Again - would you care to know where they were in the same month back in 2006, before the financial system fell apart? Approximately 6.92 million units.4 No recovery there either.

Then there's unemployment. Judging by all the recent earnings-release cheerleading, March's jobs numbers seem to have been forgotten, but they were plainly weak. The US Labor Department showed US hiring slowing to a mere 120,000 new jobs in March, below expectations of 200,000+.5 That's not a recovery. That's simply weak data.

Same goes for the most recent jobless claims numbers, which have been running above 380,000 for the last two weeks, above the 375,000 threshold that supposedly signals future unemployment increases.6 Again - this is not positive data, this is weak data. How high will it have to go before the economists admit that it's weak? 400,000? 425,000? We're asking - we'd like to know.

Then there are US tax receipts, which continue to point in the same direction. If the US is recovering so strongly, then why are employment tax receipts only up 2%? ($484 billion fiscal year-to-date as of March 2012 vs. $475 billion over the same period to March 2011).7 A 2% increase is explainable by inflation alone, which was last reported running at 2.7% according to the Bureau of Labour Stastics.8 Shouldn't the tax receipts be much higher than that? Wasn't unemployment down so far this year? As the Associated Press plainly states, "The unemployment rate has fallen to 8.2% in March [2012] from 9.1% in August [2011]. Part of the drop was because people gave up looking for work. People who are out of work but not looking for jobs aren't counted among the unemployed."9 Oh! Sorry,… now the numbers make more sense. There hasn't been any net new employment at all. Question: if everyone "gives up" looking for work next week, will the US unemployment rate go to zero? We're asking - we'd like to know.

Other economic indicators exhibit the same downward momentum that the pundits are loath to acknowledge. For example, the Economic Cycle Research Institute's (ECRI) Weekly Leading Indicator index, which had been rising from its 2011 lows earlier this year, has resumed its downtrend in April.10 More recently, US Durable Goods Orders were revealed to have dropped 4.2% in March, representing the largest decline since January 2009.11 To top it all off, China's most recent Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) indicated that China's manufacturing activity has now been in contraction for six months in a row.12

FIGURE 1: SPANISH BANKS - DEPOSIT AND EUROSYSTEM FUNDING (% OF TOTAL ASSETS),
1999 - FEB 2012

maag_CHT_Spanish-Banks_IMO.gif

Note: Deposits of domestic ex credit institutions in Spanish MFIs. Eurosystem borrowing Eurosystem funding via Open Market Operations Source: Bank of Spain, ECB and Citi Investment Research and Analysis

Meanwhile, the situation in Europe continues to worsen. There's no point in mincing words: Spain is a complete disaster. This past week, the Spanish government managed to pull off two separate bond auctions, only to have the yield on their 10-year government bond shoot right back up the moment the second auction closed. Everyone's nervous because the Spanish banking system is up to its eyeballs in approximately €143.8 billion worth of delinquent loans, and the private sector is unwilling to lend Spanish banks the money to weather the potential write-downs.13 As we've seen before, the real culprit plaguing the Spanish banks is customer deposit withdrawals. It is estimated that €65 billion of deposits left Spanish banks this past March alone.14 People are taking their money out of the Spanish banking system, and without the help of the generous European Central Bank (ECB), the Spanish banks would likely be in a full collapse today (see Figure 1).15 As it stands, the Spanish banks have now borrowed a massive €316.3 billion from the ECB in order to meet the withdrawals and maintain the illusion of solvency.

Perhaps it's Euro-crisis fatigue, or maybe just plain denial, but the equity markets appear unwilling to acknowledge how close we are now to yet another round of Eurozone upheaval. Spain's economy is almost five times that of Greece. Spain also has over four times the amount of externally-held nominal debt outstanding.16 If the bond vigilantes choose to punish the Spanish 10-year bond (currently trading precariously close to a 6% yield), we could soon be back where we were this past September, only with a problem four times as large.

The rest of Europe isn't looking so hot either. Italy's bond market is in a similar situation to that of Spain, with the Italian 10-year bond trading perilously close to the 6%-yield threshold. Recent data showed the European Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) falling to 47.4 in March, well below the 50 mark which signals growth in industrial activity.17 German PMI recently confirmed this move with its April release of 46.3, down from 48.4 in March, representing the fastest rate of contraction since July 2009.18 These declines in economic activity, combined with the austerity measures most Euro countries are currently attempting to impose, almost guarantee more printed money will be pumped into the European bond markets before the year is over. It's simply a matter of time.

As expected, the powers that be are busy parading around in preparation for the next round of Eurozone panic, with the IMF using the renewed concerns as an opportunity to re-establish its relevance as a firewall provider. The IMF most recently secured $430 billion worth of new "pledges" from various G20 member countries to increase its potential lending capacity to $700 billion in the event of further problems in the Eurozone.19 Not unsurprisingly, the BRICS countries have expressed irritation at the disproportionate voting power held by Western powers within the IMF at the expense of themselves and the other developing nations. In prepared remarks at an IMF press conference, Brazil's finance minister criticized the skewed quotas that dictate voting power, stating that, "The calculated quota share of Luxembourg is larger than the one of Argentina or South Africa… The quota share of Belgium is larger than that of Indonesia and roughly three times that of Nigeria. And the quota of Spain, amazing as it may seem, is larger than the sum total of the quotas of all 44 sub-Saharan African countries."20 This unbalance used to make sense when the IMF was designed to help fund ailing third world and developing countries through economic crisis. But that is clearly no longer the IMF's main purpose.

It must be difficult for the BRICS countries today. On one hand, they continue to jockey for respect among the Western powers, insisting on participating in quasi-European bailout funds like the IMF. On the other hand, they are also clearly aware of the Western nations' continuing efforts to surreptitiously devalue their domestic currencies, and the pernicious effect that has had on them as exporters and as lenders of capital. In that vein, it was interesting to note that during the latest BRICS Summit held this past March in New Delhi, the main topic of discussion centered on the creation of the group's first official institution, a so-called "BRICS Bank" that would fund development projects and infrastructure in developing nations. Although not openly discussed, reports suggest what they were really talking about was creating a type of BRICS central bank - an institution that could facilitate their ability to "do more business with each other in their local currencies, to help insulate from U.S. dollar fluctuations…"21 Given the incredible scale of western central bank intervention over the past six months, the BRICS' increasing frustration with their printing efforts should be a given by now. The real question is what they're doing about it, and what assets they're accumulating to protect themselves from the inevitable, which brings us to gold.

Although the paper gold price has been range-bound over the past month, the physical gold market has been undergoing staggering change. Earlier this month it was revealed that Hong Kong gold imports into China totaled nearly 40 tonnes in the month of February, representing a 13-fold increase over the same month last year (see Figure 2).22 40 tonnes annualized equates to 480 tonnes per year - a massive number in a market that only produced 2,810 tonnes of mine supply in 2011.23

FIGURE 2: CHINA'S GOLD IMPORTS FROM HONG KONGmaag_CHT_China's-gold-imports_IMO.gif
Source: Hong Kong Census and Statistic Dept, Reuters
Reuters graphic/Catherine Trevethan, Rujun Shen 11/04/12

If there's one thing we now know for certain, it's the fact that the market has completely missed the importance of the demand-side changes currently taking place in the physical gold market. China has now imported 436 tonnes of gold through Hong Kong over the past eight months.24 This compares to imports of a mere 57 tonnes over the same eight month-period a year earlier (July 2010 - February 2011). The net new demand implied by this increase is 379 tonnes, which when annualized equates to 568 tonnes of new demand in a market that supplies 2,810 tonnes per year in mine production. These are astounding numbers. Recent IMF data also shows that at least 12 countries increased their physical gold reserves by 58 tonnes in the month of March, with Mexico, Turkey, Russia and Kazakhstan making sizeable purchases.25 58 tonnes annualized equates to 696 tonnes of demand per year. We know that central banks bought 439.7 tonnes of gold in 2011, and if the pace of recent central bank purchases continues, it will equate to another 256 tonnes of net new change in the physical gold market.

The significance of this demand shift is striking. If we combine China's implied net change of 568 tonnes with the central banks' net change of 256 tonnes, we're left with a demand shift of over 824 tonnes vs. an annual mine supply of 2,810 tonnes. That represents close to a 30% net change in the physical gold market in 2012. If we remove the portion of global gold production produced by China and the other non-G6 central bank gold buyers (like Russia and Mexico - because we know they're not sellers), we're now dealing with over 824 tonnes of demand change hitting an annual global mine supply of a mere 2,170 tonnes - representing a 38% shift.26 Although we have been continually reminded that 'fundamentals don't matter' in today's marketplace, there isn't a physical market on earth that can withstand that type of demand increase without higher prices over the long-run, and the gold market is no different. There are no sellers of physical gold that we know of who can satiate that scale of new demand, and global gold mine supply has been virtually flat for over the last ten years. Even if we incorporate the estimated 1,600 tonnes of "recycled gold" that the World Gold Council insists on including in its annual gold supply estimates, the numbers above still suggest a net change of 19%.27 Who is going to give up their gold purchases to make room for this scale of new demand? Where is the gold going to come from? We ask because we don't actually know.

We have written at length about the disconnect between the paper gold price and the physical gold market. If the demand changes stated above applied to any other market, the investing public would lose their minds. Could you imagine, for example, if the demand shifts described above were applied to the global oil market? What would happen if a single country came in from nowhere and increased its oil purchases by a factor equivalent to 30% of the world's annual oil supply? We are students first and foremost of the physical market, and the numbers stated above speak for themselves. We remain confident about gold for the simple reason that the demand we are now seeing for physical is completely unsustainable without higher prices, and we do not see that demand abating in the coming months. The US recovery is not happening. Europe is poised for yet another full-fledged economic crisis, and the BRICS countries continue to aggressively convert to hard assets like gold in order to protect themselves from currency debasement. The paper market for gold can continue its charade, but demand in the physical market will soon overpower it through sheer momentum - there's only so much physical to go around, and it appears that there are some very large buyers that are eager to take it.

1 Cooper, Stephen and Mayo, Raemeka (April 24, 2012) "New Residential Sales in March 2012". U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved April 24, 2012 from http://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/pdf/newressales.pdf
2 Isidore, Chris (April 27, 2006) " New Home Sales Soar". CNN Money. Retrieved April 20, 2012 from http://money.cnn.com/2006/04/26/news/economy/newhomes/index.htm
3 Reuters (April 19, 2012) "U.S. existing home sales fall 2.6% in March". Montreal Gazette. Retrieved April 20, 2012 from http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/existing+home+sales+fall+March/6484888/story.html
4 Molony, Walter (April 25, 2006) "Existing-Home Sales Rise Again in March". National Association of Realtors. Retrieved on April 20, 2012 from: http://archive.realtor.org/article/existing-home-sales-rise-again-march
5 Fletcher, Michael A. (April 6, 2012) "U.S. hiring slowed sharply in March; unemployment fell to 8.2%". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 19, 2012 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/us-hiring-slowed-sharply-inmarch-unemployment-fell-to-82-percent/2012/04/06/gIQAroNXzS_story.html
6 Gibbons, Scott and Sznoluch, Tony (April 26, 2012) "Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Data". United States Department of Labor. Retrieved on April 26, 2012 from http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/current.htm 
7 Department of the Treasury (March 31 1, 2012) "Monthly Treasury Statement". U.S. Treasury. Retrieved April 15, 2012 from http://www.fms.treas.gov/mts/mts0312.pdf (see pg 34)
8 Associated Press (April 13, 2012) "U.S. inflation rate cools in March". CBC News. Retrieved April 20, 2012 from http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/04/13/us-inflation.html
9 Rugaber, Christopher S. (April 19, 2012) "US unemployment claims signal slower hiring". Associated Press. Retrieved April 19, 2012 from http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-04-19-US-Unemployment-Benefits/id-6c727abcd67641f193cdb091302d6424
10 Short, Doug (April 20, 2012) "ECRI Weekly Leading Indicator: The Growth Index Slips". Advisor Perspectives. Retrieved on April 20, 2012 from http://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/ECRI-Weekly-Leading-Index.php
11 Reuters (April 25, 2012) "Durable Goods Orders Show The Sharpest Drop in 3 Years". New York Times. Retrieved on April 25, 2012 from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/26/business/economy/us-durable-goods-orders-fall-sharply.html
12 Kazer, William and Li, Liu (April 22, 2012) "Initial HSBC China PMI Gains In April But Still In Contractionary Range". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from: http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20120422-717772.html
13 Bjork, Christopher and Roman, David (April 18, 2012) "Spanish Banks' Bad Omen". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved April 19, 2012 from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303513404577351554212260294.html
14 Bloomberg Editors (April 12, 2012) "Europe's Capital Flight Betrays Currency's Fragility". Bloomberg. Retrieved April 15, 2012 from http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-12/europe-s-capital-flight-betrays-currency-s-fragility?category=%2Fnews%2Faustralia-newzealand%2F&BB_NAVI_DISABLE=BIZ
15 Foxman, Simone (April 17, 2012) "Chart of the Day: The Run On Spain". Business Insider. Retrieved April 19, 2012 from http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-deposits-disappearing-from-spanish-banks-2012-4?utm_source=alerts&nr_email_referer=1
16 World Factbook (April 13, 2012) "Spain Section" Central Intelligence Agency. Retreived April 19, 2012 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html
17 Billington, Ilona (April 24, 2012) "Euro-Zone's Private Sector Shrinking Fast". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303459004577361250582738454.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
18 Baghdjian, Alice (April 23, 2012) "German manufacturing shrinks at fastest pace since 2009 - PMI" Reuters. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/04/23/uk-germany-manufacturing-idUKBRE83M0DO20120423
19 Lowrey, Annie (April 20, 2012) "I.M.F. Adds $430 Billion in emergency Lending Ability". New York Times. Retrieved April 20, 2012 from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/21/business/global/imf-adds-430-billion-in-emergency-lending-ability.html?_r=1
20 Ibid.
21 Associated Press (March 29, 2012) "India endorses BRICS bank". CBC News. Retrieved April 15, 2012 from http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012/03/29/brics-summit-india-bank.html
22 Thomson Reuters (April 10, 2012) "Hong Kong February Gold Flow to China up 20%". CNBC. Retrieved April 15, 2012 from http://www.cnbc.com/id/47012323/Hong_Kong_February_Gold_Flow_to_China_Up_20
23 World Gold Council (April 2012) "Demand and Supply Statistics". World Gold Council. Retireved April 25, 2012 from http://www.gold.org/investment/statistics/demand_and_supply_statistics/
24 Reuters (April 11, 2012) "Chinese Gold Imports From Hong Kong Rise Nearly 13 Fold - PBOC Likely Buying Dip Again". Goldcore. Retrieved April 15, 2012 from http://www.goldcore.com/goldcore_blog/chinese-gold-imports-hong-kong-rise-nearly-13-fold---pboc-likely-buying-dip-again
25 Williams, Lawrence (April 24, 2012) "Twelve countries increase their gold reserves in March - some significantly". Mineweb. Retrieved April 25, 2012 from http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page34?oid=150086&sn=Detail&id=102055
26 George, Michael (January 2012) "Gold". U.S. Geological Survey. Retireved April 25, 2012 from http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/gold/mcs-2012-gold.pdf
27 World Gold Council (April 2012) "Demand and Supply Statistics". World Gold Council. Retireved April 25, 2012 from http://www.gold.org/investment/statistics/demand_and_supply_statistics/


2008 was Lehman. 2012 is…

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 08:39 AM PDT

Dave Gonigam – April 27, 2012

  • The next Lehman — as identified by the researcher who generated 462% gains as Lehman crashed and burned
  • Food prices up again: Mayer on the best way to play a growing and better-fed world population
  • Feds back off family farm regulations… while pursuing full-court press to destroy Internet privacy
  • Faber's global stock outlook… the slender, but powerful book that could change your life… and last chance for 5 readers only: unprecedented trial access to the Reserve

"If Greece was Bear Stearns, Spain is Lehman Bros." said the alert one week ago today from Dan Amoss.

Considering he delivered his readers 462% gains on Lehman as it circled the bowl in 2008, it was hard not to pay attention.

After the U.S. close yesterday afternoon, Standard & Poor's affirmed this outlook.

It delivered a gut punch… followed by a swift kick… to Spain's government debt. The agency downgraded the kingdom not by one, but two notches, from A to BBB+.

"S&P is subtly warning Spain that its banking system needs more capital," says Dan, digging for the story the financial media aren't onto yet.

"The situation in Spain is very similar to Ireland in 2008. Ireland had low sovereign debt until it decided to recapitalize its banks."

The rest is history: Ireland racked up huge debts, and it still didn't do the banks any good. Today, Irish taxpayers are being drained faster than a pint of Smithwick's.

While Spain lies doubled over from S&P's pummeling, the nation's keepers of statistics kicked sand in its face this morning: They announced Spain has reached record unemployment at 24.4%.

Barring a miracle, GDP numbers due Monday will indicate the country is back in recession.

"With a worsening recession, 24% unemployment and a government on the verge of being shut out of the private credit markets," says Dan, "Spanish banks have run out of time.

"The banks," he explains, "are just starting to recognize long-delayed loan losses. As they do, they will need fresh equity injections to remain solvent. Many depositors are fleeing Spain because they are worried that the banks are insolvent, and not addressing their capital shortfalls."

"If the EU and IMF want to prevent Spain from sparking a 'Lehman Bros.' panic in the European banking system, they will perform triage to rebuild confidence in bank depositors."

That is, depositors will be made whole first… followed by the holders of assorted derivatives instruments.

Shareholders? They'll be holding the bag. "Spanish bank shareholders," Dan concludes, "are going to be left with little to no claim on bank assets when this is all over."

Dan — our resident stock market vigilante — has identified a way to profit from this certainty.

He has a knack for this. Not only did he spot a way readers could make more than five times their money on a failing Lehman in 2008, he delivered a 95% gain in 2011 as American Airlines sank into Chapter 11.

At the moment, the only way new readers can access Dan's premium research is through membership in the Agora Financial Reserve. To celebrate The 5's five-year anniversary, we're offering Reserve membership on a trial basis — something we've never done before. It's an extraordinary offer, and it expires at midnight tonight. Addison lays out the details here.

U.S. stocks have shrugged off the pain in Spain, to say nothing of a U.S. GDP number that missed expectations this morning. All the major indexes are up, however slightly.

First-quarter GDP rang in at an annualized 2.2%. The "expert consensus" was looking for 2.6%. The number in the previous quarter was 3.0%. Not good by any measure.

Currency traders, perhaps sensing the GDP number will drive the Fed to do something stupid, are pulling the dollar down this morning.

At last check, the dollar index had slipped to 78.7, the lowest in two months. The euro has improbably strengthened to $1.327.

Japan's central bank moved overnight to affirm Einstein's definition of insanity.

The Bank of Japan will pursue 5 trillion yen in additional "asset purchases" — i.e., shoring up the banks' balance sheets and printing money to do so.

The yen has weakened to 80.446… but that keeps it well within the range of Abe Cofnas' demonstration trade this week. Recall he expected the yen to close the week somewhere between 79.75-82.75.

This will be good for gains of 6.9% and 10.4%… not bad for a week's work. And it makes Abe 8 for 9 on the sample trades we started following in The 5 two months ago.

Gold is taking its cue from the sinking dollar as the weekend approaches. The spot price has perked up again to $1,664. Silver has firmed to $31.38.

"I think that the markets for the next one-two months will be going lower," says the inestimable Dr. Marc Faber with his take on global stocks.

"We have had, essentially, the S&P making a new high in early April at 1,422," he explains to CNBC India. "But most of the other markets in the world didn't exceed the May 2011 highs. So if you would build an advance/decline line of all stock markets in the world, it would be in a downtrend.

"From the recovery highs, in early May, we could easily see a 20% decline."

Dr. Faber is coming back to our annual gathering in Vancouver this year. Through next Wednesday only, you can secure admission at hundreds of dollars off the regular fee.

Food prices are back on the rise, according to new figures from the World Bank. Its food index rose 8% between December and March.

During the previous four-month span, it actually fell. "The price indexes of grains, fats and oils and other foods all increased in each month since January 2012," says the World Bank report.

Blame it on rising oil prices, strong Asian demand and poor weather in parts of Europe and the Americas. And it all underscores the need for a critical commodity that Chris Mayer has tracked down in his extensive travels — phosphate.

"I call it 'white gold,'" he writes in a new report for readers of his premium advisory Mayer's Special Situations. "While it is a rock, it is not a precious metal at all. Instead, it's something much more valuable to the world. It helps solve the growing number of hungry mouths. And the price of this rock has risen faster than the price of gold itself."

"A few years back, the price spiked 700% in just a short time frame. There is no substitute for 'white gold.' It's crucial to the world's food supply. And most of the world's mines are in decline. Foreign Policy magazine recently called it 'the gravest resource shortage you've never heard of.' This critical commodity has a hand in 40% of the world's food supply."

His favorite play in the sector has solid management, he tells us, "and they seem to have a pair of world-class deposits in hand in what is fast becoming a strategic resource."

[Ed. Note: For only a few more hours, you can access Chris' premium research... and Abe's trading guidance... and Dan's recommendations... and free admission to Vancouver... at an extraordinary trial rate.

Indeed, members of the Agora Financial Reserve get lifetime access to everything we publish... and now you can give it a test-drive.

We're doing it to celebrate five years of The 5... and this offer is open only to readers of The 5. For a comprehensive list of the privileges and benefits of membership, and all the details of this trial offer... please give this invitation your attention.

We've never made the Reserve this accessible... which is why we're keeping the offer open for less than 48 hours. It expires tonight at midnight.

For the second time in a year, the feds have backed off a proposed regulation that would have throttled the few remaining family farms.

As we mentioned on Wednesday, the Labor Department proposed bringing all manner of farm chores under the child-labor laws. After howls of protest prompted by a story at The Daily Caller, the plan has been dropped. "This regulation will not be pursued for the duration of the Obama administration," says a press release from the department.

Thus, we have a rerun of last year's incident, in which anyone who drives a farm vehicle would have had to get a commercial driver's license. The Transportation Department had to back off that one too.

But every time public opposition makes the bureaucrats back off, you can count on them to come back with something different... or perhaps stealthier.

Thus, after popular opposition killed the "Stop Online Piracy Act" three months ago... perhaps even worse legislation has now passed the U.S. House.

SOPA would have given government the authority to vaporize websites from the Internet without due process. After scores of popular sites protested by going dark for a day, Congress got the message.

Wikipedia on Jan. 18: An effective protest... but it can only be done so often

Enter CISPA, or the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act. "The previous bills," Internet activist Aaron Swartz explains, "were about giving the government the power to censor the Internet. And this is more like a Patriot Act for the Internet."

CISPA permits companies ranging from Verizon to Facebook "to hand over your private communications to government officials without a warrant," says Rep. Ron Paul, "circumventing well-established federal laws like the Wiretap Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act."

"Basically," sums up the tech-news website Techdirt, "it says the Fourth Amendment does not apply online, at all."

The bill was rushed to a vote last night — so quickly Dr. Paul couldn't make it back to Washington in time. The Senate might follow up by the time you read this.

"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty," goes the expression. It's often attributed to Thomas Jefferson... and while Jefferson scholars can't find evidence of that, they tell us, "This quotation was well-known in the 19th century, and was, in fact, used by a number of famous figures, including Frederick Douglass."

It is undoubtedly less well-known in the 21st. Which brings us around to our new project. It's not a newsletter or a trading advisory. At the same time, it's not a political movement. If anything, it's more subversive... heh.

Jeffrey Tucker, who heads it up, calls it "the first comprehensive, digital-age society of big ideas. As a member, you'll have everything you need to cultivate learning and living a free life. And best of all, everything included with the club comes to you for free with your membership, potentially saving you hundreds of dollars in expenses."

Today, charter members of the club are getting a free e-book of Rose Wilder Lane's 1943 classic The Discovery of Freedom. It's not available in e-book form anywhere else.

They also have the opportunity to exchange ideas in a private forum that's members-only. Under CISPA, Dr. Paul says it's not too far-fetched to have "government-approved employees embedded at Facebook, complete with federal security clearances, serving as conduits for secret information about their American customers." By contrast, our project is small enough to fly under Uncle Sam's radar.

Membership comes with a host of benefits we can't begin to list here — seriously, give it a look — and right now, we're offering an extra incentive to make it worth your while. But only through midnight tomorrow.

"We know," a reader writes after Jeffrey Tucker's overtime briefing yesterday, "that toilets are now regulated in the flush water allowed."

"Some manufacturers have in some cases redesigned the toilets so they flush adequately with the lower water quantity, but as usual, the government failed to consider that older homes with terra cotta waste pipes underground (consider the joints) cannot pass along the wastes without the greater water flow offered in older toilets."

"One work-around is that on a regular basis it's necessary to dump an entire bucket of extra water with the flush to keep the pipes under the concrete basement clear. The law of unexpected consequences strikes again! And thus what became of water conservation?"

"Check out electric trimmers: Why do the newer ones fail to work?"

"How about washers and dryers that have doors opening on the side instead of on the top? Why do they require replacing more often than the older models? Could it be the plastic hub bearings wearing out?"

"We know that the government has a new way to calculate the CPI based upon technological improvement, but do they now adjust for the 'effectiveness failure' of products due to regulations? I am sure not!"

"Keep up the good work, folks!"

The 5: Yes, the law of unintended consequences is enforced every day in little ways around your home. Which is what makes Jeffrey's special report so valuable. It's called Hack Your Showerhead: Plus, Nine Other Ways to Get Big Government out of Your Home.

Together, they make up 10 simple, subtle, even sneaky ways to stick it to Uncle Sam. Best of all, they're completely legal — at least for now. This report is only one element in a whole bunch of goodies that comes with our new project, the Laissez Faire Club. To learn about the rest, check this out. Please note: This offer expires at midnight tomorrow.

Have a good weekend,

Dave Gonigam
The 5 Min. Forecast

P.S. Final reminder, exclusive to readers of The 5: Trial memberships in the Agora Financial Reserve are available only through midnight tonight.

If you've ever thought you'd like to join but the upfront cost was a deal killer, you have no excuse now. Here's where to act.

Preparing for the launch of the Laissez Faire Club took the better part of four months, and the involvement of everyone from Addison to Jeffrey Tucker to Agora Inc. founder Bill Bonner to Whiskey & Gunpowder's Gary Gibson.

One of the biggest challenges: Identifying the essential volumes to make up a box set we call "Economics in One Library." In the end, the group settled on four books. Today, Jeffrey tells the story of the volume that's the oldest, the slimmest... and in its own way, the most important.

What Is or Should Be the Law?

by Jeffrey Tucker

It seems that the president is frustrated with Congress. What kind of legislature is this, he asks, that fails to immediately enact the will of the executive? The executive has been using a slightly different approach these days: He uses an executive order. Forget all that stuff you have read in the civics texts about checks and balances and the branches of government. The executive order bypasses them all.

The White House even has a name for this: "We Can't Wait." There is even an official dot-gov website. Hey, if you are going to shred the Constitution and pass laws like a dictator, the best approach is to do it out in the open. "If Congress refuses to act," he says, "I'll continue to do everything in my power to act without them."

To be fair, he is hardly the first. The president before him did it, and the president before that and so on back to World War I and before. Every new guy cites the precedent of the old guy, as if that alone provides justification. Defying the Constitution has a long tradition, don't you know.

But you know what this tells me? What this country needs is a good theory of law. We even lack the language to talk about what is happening to us. One party denounces the other but only in ways that exempt itself from criticism. As a result, the "man on the street" is not even prepared to talk about fundamental questions.

Example: Where did law come from, and what should it do? Sure, people get annoyed at the police, irritated by the TSA or startled to read about periodic injustices of public policy. One party gets annoyed when the other party's president enacts laws without regard to any constitutional conventions.

But what is the law, and what should it be? These are the bigger questions that are not part of public consciousness.

The same was true in the time of Frederic Bastiat (1801-50). At the very end of his life, he wrote an impassioned plea on the topic. He tried to get people to think hard about what was happening and how law had become an instrument of plunder, rather than a protector of property.

He writes:

It is not true that the function of law is to regulate our consciences, our ideas, our wills, our education, our opinions, our work, our trade, our talents or our pleasures. The function of law is to protect the free exercise of these rights, and to prevent any person from interfering with the free exercise of these same rights by any other person.

This is from Bastiat's The Law, one of the great political essays to emerge from the whole Continental world of the 19th century. it vanished into obscurity in France, was resurrected in late 19th century English, and then disappeared again, only to reappear in the United States in the 1950s, thanks to the efforts of the Foundation of Economic Education.

This essay asks fundamental questions that most people go through life never having thought about. This book is part of Laissez Faire Books' set of new works that seeks to find what is essential in the literature and distribute it in new ways. The book comes free to you (both physical and digital) with a membership in the Laissez Faire Club.

The problem is that most people accept the law as a given, a fundamental fact. As a member of society, you obey or face the consequences. It is not safe to question why. This is because the enforcement arm of the law is the state, that peculiar agency with a unique power in society to use legal force against life and property. The state says what the law is — however this decision was made — and that settles it.

Bastiat could not accept this. He wanted to know what the law is, apart from what the state says it is. He saw that the purpose of law is, most fundamentally, to protect private property and life against invasion, or at least to ensure that justice is done in cases in which such invasions do take place. This is hardly a unique idea; it is a summary of what philosophers, jurists and theologians have thought in most times and places.

Then he takes that next step, the one that opens the reader's eyes as nothing else. He subjects the state itself to the test of whether it, the state itself, complies with that idea of law.

He takes notice, even from the first paragraph, that the state itself turns out to be a lawbreaker in the name of law keeping. It does the very thing that law is supposed to prevent. Instead of protecting private property, it invades it. Instead of protecting life, it destroys it. Instead of guarding liberty, it violates it. And as the state advances and grows, it does this ever more, until it becomes a threat to the well-being of society itself.

Even more tellingly, Bastiat observes that when you subject the state to the same standards that the law uses to judge relations between individuals, the state fails. He concludes that when this is the case, the law has been perverted in the hands of the governing elites. It is employed to do the very thing that the law is designed to prevent. The enforcer turns out to be the main violator of its own standards.

The passion, the fire, the relentless logic have the power to shake up most any reader. Nothing is the same. This is why this monograph is rightly famous. It is capable of shaking up whole systems of government and whole societies. What a beautiful illustration of the power of the pen.

But take notice of Bastiat's rhetorical approach here. His conclusion is at the beginning. Why? He did not have that much time (he died not long after writing The Law). He knew that the reader didn't, either. He wanted to raise consciousness and persuade in the most-effective way. Even from a stylistic point of view, there is much to learn from his approach.

Laissez Faire Books is honored to give new life to this remarkable document in this edition, which revives the translation by Dean Russell. It also includes an introduction by Bill Bonner, who gets my vote for the most-underrated voice in defense of old-style liberalism in the world today. He explains how Bastiat's essay opened his eyes to see the world in a new way.

It is a habit of every generation to underestimate the importance and power of ideas. Yet the whole world that we live in is built by them. Nothing outside pure nature exists in this world that did not begin as an idea held by human beings. This is why a book like this is so powerful and important. It helps you see injustices that surround us, which we are otherwise inclined to ignore. And seeing is the first step to changing.

That's why it continues to be printed and circulated and why every living soul should read it. If we are to see a renewed appreciation of the idea of liberty in our lifetimes, this monograph written so long ago in a country so far away will deserve a great deal of the credit.

Jeffrey Tucker
Executive editor
Laissez Faire Books
Primus inter pares, Laissez Faire Club

P.S. Today we release the first-ever digital edition of one of my favorite books ever: The Discovery of Freedom by Rose Wilder Lane, with an introduction by Wendy McElroy. It will later be available for purchase for $9, or get a copy free alongside all members of Laissez Faire Club! Here's how.

[Ed. Note: If you act before midnight tomorrow, you get one free month of membership in Laissez Faire Club. Take advantage at this link.]


The Implications of a European Economic Recovery

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 08:23 AM PDT

Synopsis: 

What to expect from a European recovery, how defense contractors cheat the system, and nine ways political journalists subtly bias their writing.


Dear Reader,

Vedran Vuk here, filling in for David Galland. Today, I'll discuss the scenario of a European recovery. Would one mean that we're finally out of the woods? I have a couple of other interesting pieces along with the Friday Funnies, so let's get started.


What If Europe Does Recover?

By Vedran Vuk, Senior Analyst

Let's play along with the economic scenario many market participants are predicting: a calmer Europe. If the continent does recover, is it time to put on the party hats and celebrate? Well, not quite. Sure, the pressure on equities would ease up, causing a brief rise in the market. But what then? Are we really out of the woods?

If Europe escapes this mess without a major crisis, those countries won't come back at a screaming pace. Instead, the path to economic recovery will still be a slow crawl. Furthermore, China continues to have problems of its own. What started as talk of a Chinese slowdown is turning into real numbers. Sure, China isn't doing horribly, but it's hardly the hot market of a few years ago. The promise of never-ending growth with minimal risk just isn't materializing. There are also other major players with mixed performances. With commodity prices cooling a bit, Brazil's GDP growth is projected at 3.2% in 2012, a slight improvement from last year's 2.7% growth. However, only a few years ago, predicting double-digit growth rates would have drawn no laughter, based on Brazil's impressive 7.5% growth rate in 2010.

And then there's the US story. The job market is improving at a snail's pace… much like the rest of the world. If the euro crisis ends, it won't mean a burst of growth for the US – but it could mean some additional headwinds. US Treasuries will no longer be shielded by buyers protecting themselves from the worst-case scenario. As soon as the coast is clear, Treasury investors will leave in droves, either flooding back into equity markets or higher-yielding euro countries.

The ball will again be back in Bernanke's court, meaning two things for the US economy. First, US interest rates will feel upward pressure. The Fed will have to pump yet more money into the system to keep them low. And second, the US dollar will tank again. The EUR/USD exchange rate has essentially been a risk-on/risk-off trade for the past six months. At the slightest bad news in Europe, the US dollar gets a little stronger. Then over the next few days, as nothing monumental happens, the euro starts to creep back up. If Europe turns into nothing but roses and sunshine, we'll slide from the current $1.31 EUR/USD to last summer's $1.45 EUR/USD in no time at all.

Remember, the dollar isn't strong. After the Federal Reserve's monetary policy of the last few years, the USD has been ravaged. It has only managed to stay afloat as a result of Europe's underperformance and other problems. If those pressures let up and the Eurozone again shows promise, the dollar is going straight down. Believe it or not, the European Central Bank is still more responsible than the Federal Reserve… and if investors have an equivalently safe option between the two, many will choose Europe.

So, even if you believe the story of parting clouds ahead, don't get too excited; this isn't the end of it. In the best-case scenario, we can stop worrying about Greece and can start worrying instead about a weakening dollar and a sluggish economy. Perhaps that's better than expecting a crash just around the corner, but it's certainly no picnic either.

(Editor's note: Whether or not Europe recovers, investors have plenty to be wary about in the coming months and years. One area where particular caution is warranted is Exchange Traded Funds [ETFs], which can easily lead you to unexpected losses. The full story's right here.)


The GSA, Federal Junkets, and Perspective

By Dustin Siggins, Hot Air contributor

Over the last two weeks, the importance of a $820,000 junket put on by the General Services Administration (GSA) in Las Vegas has dominated the politician and pundit worlds. The spending spree has resulted in an investigation from Congress, the release of several federal employees and recriminations from both parties. Unfortunately, it has also allowed Congress and many pundits to act as though being tough on the GSA is the equivalent of good governance, something that when faced with the facts is laughably false.

Don't misunderstand – the GSA and other federal agencies should be held accountable for this and other unethical abuses of the public's money. As The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell outlined on April 19, and again on April 23, this is only one of many publicly egregious wastes of taxpayer money in the bureaucracies in D.C. But when it comes down to it, $820,000 is not even a drop in the bucket of fraud/waste/abuse/duplicity. Here are some of the other, more easily ignored abuses:

First off is simple abuse that is acceptable for the well-connected politician but disgraceful and/or illegal for anyone else – small change, but ultimately emblematic of the systemic corruption in the federal government. Case in point is how former Representative Anthony Weiner (D-NY) gets a pension and other benefits for the rest of his life, despite resigning in disgrace. President Obama, following in the footsteps of his predecessors, is almost certainly using taxpayer dollars for campaign trips – illegal, but obviously acceptable under both parties. Senator David Vitter (R-LA) was busted for solicitation, but never spent time in jail. He will get a pension and other monetary benefits, same as Weiner.

Antithetical to many conservatives is looking hard at unproductive defense spending. However, the Defense Department is rife with abuse. For example, last October a report by Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) outlined how major defense contractors who paid civil fines or settled for amounts of $1 million or greater still received over $500 billion in contracts in the last 10 years. Another report, this one from The Commission Wartime Contracting [sic], estimated that between $31 billion and $60 billion had been lost to poor oversight and/or fraud in Iraq and Afghanistan during our time in those nations.

Outside of fraud, simple inefficiencies abound in the Defense Department. This Forbes piece notes that approximately $100 billion had been spent on weapons programs that were either never used or eventually canceled – all after significant investments. In an informal conversation with a friend who is a military auditor, I was told that a number of contractors take a contract and take a percentage off the top. They then subcontract to another company, which takes a percentage off the top. This subcontractor then subcontracts to another company, and takes a percentage off the top. Finally, several levels down, the contract actually gets fulfilled.

(Please read the full article in Hot Air's Green Room.)


Nine Ways Political Writers Miss the Mark

By Vedran Vuk

When I first started writing about finance and politics, my blood would boil from reading some of the arguments other writers made. But now, not much in the way of poorly constructed articles surprises me anymore. One must either adapt or suffer an early stroke.

However, there are a number of commonly used writing tricks and fallacies that continue to get me riled up. They are subtle ways in which the writer attempts to disguise reality to support his point or are oversimplifications of the issues that make no sense upon closer examination and only serve to misguide the reader. Everyone from the hardcore libertarian to the downright Marxist and everyone in between has used at least one of the techniques listed below:

1. One-Dimensional Characters. People are complex. They want all sorts of things: money, power, love, attention, respect, etc. Anyone's career and life motivations are comprised of an intricate web of factors. Yet in the world of political writing, there are apparently only two motivations: greed and altruism. Any issue where a side has money to gain is explained by greed, and every action which doesn't seem to involve money is explained by pure altruism.

If a billionaire wants fewer and/or lower taxes, he is immediately labeled a "greedy aristocrat." If another billionaire wants higher taxes and universal health care, he is praised for his selflessness. In reality, the first billionaire is probably hardly greedy and the second is hardly altruistic. Why should someone with a billion dollars be concerned with any tax rate? Even if the marginal rate goes to 95%, his life will not change much. In many ways, the guy earning $150K per year has a lot more to fear from higher taxes than the billionaire.

But what of the supposed altruist? He has much to gain from his political position. Yes, people are motivated by money, but also by a desire for attention, power, and/or respect. The limelight and political power are just as intoxicating as piles of money. And those who value them are getting exactly what they want with these "altruistic" positions. Framing any argument only in the context of greed for money distorts the complex motivations of most people.

2. The Single Source. The title of these pieces will often go something like this: New Study Shows Minimum Wage Has No Effect on Unemployment. From there, the article will relay how this new paper's statistical analysis disproves flaws in the law and how policy makers should react. Of course, the article also ignores a few hundred other papers with the opposite conclusion. In some cases, this sort of article is okay, but in areas where the research to the contrary is extensive and the topic is hotly debated in academia, a single source is not adequate evidence to proclaim a "slam dunk" for your argument.

3. Speeches as Policy. Let's start with an example. In a campaign speech, Obama boldly speaks out against the wars. Hence, a journalist concludes that Obama has an anti-war foreign-policy stance. The problem is simple: words are not actions, but political writers are somehow allowed to sidestep this very obvious point. Both sides of the aisle manipulate this on the same issue sometimes. There are Democrats who support Obama because of his speeches on the wars in the Middle East, while neoconservatives attack him for the same words. Yet his actual foreign policy should appeal to the neoconservatives and should disgust the Democrats. There's a difference between policy analysis and speech analysis. Many journalists apparently still have not figured that out.

4. Unnecessary Side Comments. Oftentimes, a writer will throw in an extra, unnecessary phrase in an otherwise objective piece to nudge a reader toward a particular view. For example: "Mitt Romney received 60% of the votes, Santorum 20%, New Gingrich 10%, and Ron Paul, with little chance of winning, 8%." The writer isn't saying something untruthful, but the Ron Paul aside isn't necessary. From the vote count, readers can infer the low chance of Ron Paul winning. Nonetheless, the writer adds an extra nudge to the reader which provides no beneficial value. This is a tactic of the writer to slyly insert an opinion while maintaining a veneer of objectivity. To a casual reader, this may not seem like a big deal, but as a writer who rereads and considers each sentence several times prior to publishing, I know that such jabs and unnecessary side comments are hardly circumstantial – or trivial.

5. Foreign-Policy Expertise. In foreign-policy pieces, a writer will often accuse someone of a weak or naïve foreign policy. But how does one prove that one is good or not at foreign policy? A fund manager earns returns, Kobe Bryant scores points, a businessman makes sales, and a construction worker builds houses. All of these professionals can show their expertise through results. But how do we know that an "expert" such as Karl Rove is really any good at foreign policy? Certainly, he has many opinions on the subject, and others often agree with him. But where are his results?

Foreign policy isn't physics, business, or engineering with observable answers. There isn't a clear right or wrong way of doing something. It all comes down to subjective opinions, so in many ways it's dumb to say, "Karl Rove has a strong foreign policy, while Obama is weak." In such a subjective field, it's impossible to prove one's opinion is really any more valuable than the next person's opinion. Calling someone's foreign policy views "weak" is a completely vacuous statement. We're not talking about the strength of a bridge, but only an opinion, and opinions can't really be weak or strong in that sense.

6. Good Intentions. Everyone has heard this a million times: "The other side has good intentions; they're just misguided." Journalists are always encouraged to find some middle ground. Hence, this approach makes the article sound more objective. And yes, they're correct to an extent – almost everyone does have good intentions.

However, if someone presents me with mountains of evidence against my point of view, yet I continue to hold my position, am I really that well intentioned? Pride and unwillingness to admit being wrong have superseded good intentions at that point. If good intentions are such prime motivators, why is there so much partisanship in Congress? Political-party pressures and one's own pride will sweep good intentions under the rug any day of the week, even when the other side is clearly right. Yet – so that journalists can maintain an objective tone to their articles – we are to imagine Congressmen as altruists battling over the best solutions to the country's many problems.

What about realizing that people are petty? Anyone who has ever had a political argument via blog or email knows this. Many people are unwilling to change their minds no matter the evidence or the argument. They just don't want to admit being wrong. It's a hard pill to swallow, but your Congressman is no more open-minded than a disgruntled blogger.

7. Good Guys Versus Bad Guys. It's almost never a story of the good guys versus the bad guys in the political realm. A story along the lines of the good union versus the evil corporation or vice versa is likely the lowest form of journalism out there. Good versus evil may be a good theme in Lord of the Rings, where heroes battle orcs. But in the real world, such a strong delineation is rarely seen.

8. Using a Story Instead of Facts. In these cases, the article starts with a story. Usually it will be an example of the most destitute person possible. For example: "Betty Jean has seven kids, and she works four jobs. She got fired last week, and she's also mentally handicapped. How is she supposed to pay for [insert your favorite activist cause – school lunches, health care, medicine, car, gasoline, rent, whatever]?" The article doesn't ever say how many people are in her situation, nor how big  the problem might be. Instead, we're supposed to form national policy prescriptions based on a single, worst-case-scenario story, which usually also leaves half of the facts out.

9. Events Explained Through Personal Values and Characteristics. It seems the media must explain everything through personal values. Take for example the latest financial crisis. Greed is always blamed as the cause. Success stories are explained in the same fashion. Economic growth in Asia is often explained by the thriftiness of the culture. It certainly helps, but there are plenty of countries around the world with very thrifty cultures that aren't doing so well economically. A change in policy toward free-enterprise and greater business freedom is what has really propelled places such as China and Singapore. I can guarantee that North Koreans are no less thrifty than their South-Korean counterparts.

The same goes with the financial crisis. Maybe, just maybe, the policies of the Federal Reserve lead to boom-and-bust cycles instead of explosions of greed. The markets don't move because we're good or bad people. Are we really to believe that everyone was less greedy in the '90s, so things were better? Even if this were true, it would be impossible to prove that greed was worse now than in 1995 or 1950, or while we're at it, 2000 B.C. Maybe I'm wrong; perhaps people back then didn't like money, power, fame, or respect.

Is it unnecessarily harsh to complain about these tactics? I don't think I'm asking too much. Simply tell the story as it is without trying to guide the reader through it. If your points are accurate, readers are naturally drawn to the conclusion. Most important, represent politicians for what they really are – people just like us instead – of virtuous altruists deciding on the world's direction.


Friday Funnies

A toothpaste factory had a problem: it sometimes shipped empty boxes without the tube inside. This was due to the way the production line was set up, and people with experience in designing production lines will tell you how difficult it is to have everything happen with timings so precise that every single unit coming out of it is perfect 100% of the time. Small variations in the environment (which can't be controlled in a cost-effective fashion) mean you must have quality-assurance checks smartly distributed across the line so that customers all the way down to the supermarket don't get pissed off and buy another product instead.

Understanding how important that was, the CEO of the toothpaste factory got the top people in the company together, and they decided to start a new project in which they would hire an external engineering company to solve their empty boxes problem, as the engineering department was already too stretched to take on any extra effort.

The project followed the usual process: budget and project sponsor allocated, RFP, third parties selected, and six months (and $8 million) later it had a fantastic solution – on time, on budget, high quality, and everyone in the project had a great time.

They solved the problem by using high-tech precision scales that would sound a bell and flash lights whenever a toothpaste box weighed less than it should. The line would stop; someone would walk over and yank the defective box off of it and press another button when done to re-start the line.

A while later, the CEO decides to have a look at the Return On Investment of the project: amazing results! No empty boxes ever shipped out of the factory after the scales were put in place. Very few customer complaints, and they were gaining market share. "That's some money well spent!" he said, before looking closely at the other statistics in the report.

It turned out that the number of defects picked up by the scales was zero after three weeks of production use. It should have picked up at least a dozen a day, so maybe there was something wrong with the report. He requested an inquiry, and after some investigation, the engineers came back saying the report was actually correct. The scales really weren't picking up any defects, because all boxes that got to that point in the conveyor belt were good.

Puzzled, the CEO traveled down to the factory and walked up to the part of the line where the precision scales were installed.

A few feet before the scale was a cheap desk fan, blowing the empty boxes out of the belt and into a bin.

"Oh, that," says one of the workers, "One of the guys put it there 'cause he was tired of walking over every time the bell rang."

That's it for today. David will probably be out again next Friday, so I'll see you again soon.

Vedran Vuk
Casey Senior Analyst


Robert Wenzel's 'David' Speech Crushes Federal Reserve's 'Goliath' Dream

Posted: 27 Apr 2012 08:08 AM PDT

In perhaps the most courageous (and likely must-read for future economists) speech ever given inside the New York Fed's shallowed hallowed walls, Economic Policy Journal's Robert Wenzel delivered the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth to the monetary priesthood. Gracious from the start, Wenzel takes the Keynesian clap-trappers to task on almost every nonsensical and oblivious decision they have made in recent years.

"My views, I suspect, differ from beginning to end... I stand here confused as to how you see the world so differently than I do. I simply do not understand most of the thinking that goes on here at the Fed and I do not understand how this thinking can go on when in my view it smacks up against reality."

and further...

"I scratch my head that somehow your conclusions about unemployment are so different than mine and that you call for the printing of money to boost 'demand'. A call, I add, that since the founding of the Federal Reserve has resulted in an increase of the money supply by 12,230%."

But his closing was tremendous:

"Let's have one good meal here. Let's make it a feast. Then I ask you, I plead with you, I beg you all, walk out of here with me, never to come back. It's the moral and ethical thing to do. Nothing good goes on in this place. Let's lock the doors and leave the building to the spiders, moths and four-legged rats."

The Full Speech is below:

Thank you very much for inviting me to speak here at the New York Federal Reserve Bank.

 

Intellectual discourse is, of course, extraordinarily valuable in reaching truth. In this sense, I welcome the opportunity to discuss my views on the economy and monetary policy and how they may differ with those of you here at the Fed.

 

That said, I suspect my views are so different from those of you here today that my comments will be a complete failure in convincing you to do what I believe should be done, which is to close down the entire Federal Reserve System

 

My views, I suspect, differ from beginning to end. From the proper methodology to be used in the science of economics, to the manner in which the macro-economy functions, to the role of the Federal Reserve, and to the accomplishments of the Federal Reserve, I stand here confused as to how you see the world so differently than I do.

 

I simply do not understand most of the thinking that goes on here at the Fed and I do not understand how this thinking can go on when in my view it smacks up against reality.

 

Please allow me to begin with methodology, I hold the view developed by such great economic thinkers as Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich Hayek and Murray Rothbard that there are no constants in the science of economics similar to those in the  physical sciences.

 

In the science of physics, we know that water freezes at 32 degrees. We can predict with immense accuracy exactly how far a rocket ship will travel filled with 500 gallons of fuel. There is preciseness because there are constants, which do not change and upon which equations can be constructed.

 

There are no such constants in the field of economics since the science of economics deals with human action, which can change at any time. If potato prices remain the same for 10 weeks, it does not mean they will be the same the following day. I defy anyone in this room to provide me with a constant in the field of economics that has the same unchanging constancy that exists in the fields of physics or chemistry.

 

And yet, in paper after paper here at the Federal Reserve, I see equations built as though constants do exist. It is as if one were to assume a constant relationship existed between interest rates here and in Russia and throughout the world, and create equations based on this belief and then attempt to trade based on these equations. That was tried and the result was the blow up of the fund Long Term Capital Management, a blow up that resulted in high level meetings in this very building.

 

It is as if traders assumed a given default rate was constant for subprime mortgage paper and traded on that belief. Only to see it blow up in their faces, as it did,  again, with intense meetings being held in this very building.

 

Yet, the equations, assuming constants, continue to be published in papers throughout the Fed system. I scratch my head.

 

I also find curious the general belief in the Keynesian model of the economy that somehow results in the belief that demand drives the economy, rather than production. I look out at the world and see iPhones, iPads, microwave ovens, flat screen televisions, which suggest to me that it is production that boosts an economy. Without production of these things and millions of other items, where would we be? Yet, the Keynesians in this room will reply, "But you need demand to buy these products." And I will reply, "Do you not believe in supply and demand? Do you not believe that products once made will adjust to a market clearing price?"

 

Further , I will argue that the price of the factors of production will adjust to prices at the consumer level and that thus the markets at all levels will clear. Again do you believe in supply and demand or not?

 

I scratch my head that somehow most of you on some academic level believe in the theory of supply and demand and how market setting prices result, but yet you deny them in your macro thinking about the economy.

 

You will argue with me that prices are sticky on the downside, especially labor prices and therefore that you must pump money to get the economy going. And,  I will look on in amazement as your fellow Keynesian brethren in the government create an environment  of sticky non-downward bending wages.

 

The economist  Robert Murphy reports that President  Herbert Hoover continually pressured businessmen to not lower wages.

 

He quoted Hoover in a speech delivered to a group of businessmen:

 

In this country there has been a concerted and determined effort  on the part of government and business... to prevent any reduction in wages.

 

He then reports that FDR actually outdid Hoover by seeking to "raise wages rates rather than merely put a floor under them."

 

I ask you, with presidents actively conducting policies that attempt to defy supply and demand and prop up wages, are you really surprised that wages were sticky downward during the Great Depression?

 

In present day America, the government focus has changed a bit. In the new focus, the government  attempts much more to prop up the unemployed by extended payments for not working. Is it really a surprise that unemployment is so high when you pay people not to work.? The 2010 Nobel Prize was awarded to economists for their studies which showed that, and I quote from the Noble press release announcing the award:

 

One conclusion is that more generous unemployment benefits give rise to higher unemployment and longer search times.

 

Don't you think it would make more sense to stop these policies which are a direct factor in causing unemployment, than to add to the mess and devalue the currency by printing more money?

 

I scratch my head that somehow your conclusions about unemployment are so different than mine  and that you call for the printing of money to boost "demand". A call, I add, that since the founding of the Federal Reserve has resulted in an increase of the money supply by 12,230%.

 

I also must scratch my head at the view that the Federal Reserve should maintain a stable price level. What is wrong with having falling prices across the economy, like we now have in the computer sector, the flat screen television sector and the cell phone sector? Why, I ask, do you want stable prices? And, oh by the way, how's that stable price thing going for you here at the Fed?

 

Since the start of the Fed, prices have increased at the consumer level by 2,241% [3]. that's not me misspeaking, I will repeat, since the start of the Fed, prices have increased at the consumer level by 2,241%.

 

So you then might tell me that stable prices are only a secondary goal of the Federal Reserve and that your real goal is to prevent serious declines in the economy but, since the start of the Fed, there have been 18 recessions including the Great Depression and the most recent Great Recession. These downturns  have resulted in stock market crashes, tens of  millions of unemployed and untold business bankruptcies.

 

I scratch my head and wonder how you think the Fed is any type of success when all this has occurred.

 

I am especially confused, since Austrian business cycle theory (ABCT), developed by Mises, Hayek and Rothbard, has warned about all these things. According to ABCT, it is central bank money printing that causes the business cycle and, again you here at the Fed have certainly done that by increasing the money supply. Can you imagine the distortions in the economy caused by the Fed by this massive money printing?

 

According to ABCT, if you print money those sectors where the money goes  will boom, stop printing and those sectors will crash. Fed printing tends to find its way to Wall Street and other capital goods sectors first, thus it is no surprise to Austrian school economists that the crashes are most dramatic in these sectors, such as the stock market and real estate sectors. The economist Murray Rothbard in his book America's Great Depression [4] went into painstaking detail outlining how the changes in money supply growth resulted in the Great Depression.

 

On a more personal level, as the recent crisis was developing here, I warned throughout the summer of 2008 of the impending crisis. On July 11, 2008 at EconomicPolicyJournal.com, I wrote:

 

SUPER ALERT: Dramatic Slowdown In Money Supply Growth

 

After growing at near double digit rates for months, money growth has slowed dramatically. Annualized money growth over the last 3 months is only 5.2%. Over the last two months, there has been zero growth in the M2NSA money measure.

 

This is something that must be watched carefully. If such a dramatic slowdown continues, a severe recession is inevitable.

 

We have never seen such a dramatic change in money supply growth from a double digit climb to 5% growth. Does Bernanke have any clue as to what the hell he is doing?

 

On July 20, 2008, I wrote:

 

I have previously noted that over the last two months money supply has been collapsing. M2NSA has gone from double digit growth to nearly zero growth.

 

A review of the credit situation appears worse. According to recent Fed data, for the 13 weeks ended June 25, bank credit (securities and loans) contracted at an annual rate of 7.9%.

 

There has been a minor blip up since June 25 in both credit growth and M2NSA, but the growth rates remain extremely slow.

 

If a dramatic turnaround in these numbers doesn't happen within the next few weeks, we are going to have to warn of a possible Great Depression style downturn.

 

Yet, just weeks before these warnings from me, Chairman Bernanke, while the money supply growth was crashing, had a decidedly much more optimistic outlook, In a speech on June 9, 2008, At the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston's 53rd Annual Economic Conference [7], he said:

 

I would like to provide a brief update on the outlook for the economy and policy, beginning with the prospects for growth.  Despite the unwelcome rise in the unemployment rate that was reported last week, the recent incoming data, taken as a whole, have affected the outlook for economic activity and employment only modestly.  Indeed, although activity during the current quarter is likely to be weak, the risk that the economy has entered a substantial downturn appears to have diminished over the past month or so.  Over the remainder of 2008, the effects of monetary and fiscal stimulus, a gradual ebbing of the drag from residential construction, further progress in the repair of financial and credit markets, and still-solid demand from abroad should provide some offset to the headwinds that still face the economy.

 

I believe the Great Recession that followed is still fresh enough in our minds so it is not necessary to recount in detail as to whose forecast, mine or the chairman's, was more accurate.

 

I am also confused by many other policy making steps here at the Federal Reserve. There have been more changes in monetary policy direction during the Bernanke era then at any other time in the modern era of the Fed. Not under Arthur Burns, not under G. William Miller, not under Paul Volcker, not under Alan Greenspan  have there been so many dramatically shifting Fed monetary policy moves. Under Chairman Bernanke there have been significant changes in direction of the money supply growth FIVE different times. Thus, for me, I am not at all surprised at the current stop and go economy. The current erratic monetary policy makes it exceedingly difficult for businessmen to make any long term plans.  Indeed, in my own Daily Alert on the economy [8] I find it extremely difficult to give long term advice, when in short periods I have seen three month annualized M2 money growth go from near 20% to near zero, and then in another period see it go from 25% to 6%.

 

I am also confused by many of the monetary programs instituted by Chairman Bernanke. For example, Operation Twist.

 

This is not the first time an Operation Twist was tried. an Operation Twist was tried in 1961, at the start of the Kennedy Administration [10] A paper [11] was written by three Federal Reserve economists in 2004 that, in part, examined the 1960's Operation Twist

 

Their conclusion (My bold):

 

A second well-known historical episode involving the attempted manipulation of the term structure was so-called Operation Twist.  Launched in early 1961 by the incoming Kennedy Administration, Operation Twist was intended to raise short-term rates (thereby promoting capital inflows and supporting the dollar) while lowering, or at least not raising, long-term rates. (Modigliani and Sutch 1966).... The two main actions of Operation Twist were the use of Federal Reserve open market operations and Treasury debt management operations..Operation Twist is widely viewed today as having been a failure, largely due to classic work by  Modigliani and Sutch....

 

However, Modigliani and Sutch also noted that Operation Twist was a relatively small operation, and, indeed, that over a slightly longer period the maturity of outstanding government debt rose significantly, rather than falling...Thus, Operation Twist does not seem to provide strong evidence in either direction as to the possible effects of changes in the composition of the central bank's balance sheet...

 

We believe that our findings go some way to refuting the strong hypothesis that nonstandard policy actions, including quantitative easing and targeted asset purchases, cannot be successful in a modern industrial economy.  However, the effects of such policies remain quantitatively quite uncertain.

 

One of the authors of this 2004 paper was Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke. Thus, I have to ask, what the hell is Chairman Bernanke doing implementing such a program, since it is his paper that states it was a failure according to Modigliani, and his paper implies that a larger test would be required to determine true performance.

 

I ask, is the Chairman using the United States economy as a lab with Americans as the lab rats to test his intellectual curiosity about such things as Operation Twist?

 

Further, I am very confused by the response of Chairman Bernanke to questioning by Congressman Ron Paul. To a seemingly near off the cuff question by Congressman Paul on Federal Reserve money provided to the Watergate burglars, Chairman Bernanke contacted the Inspector General's Office of the Federal Reserve and requested an investigation [12]. Yet, the congressman has regularly asked about the gold certificates held by the Federal Reserve [13] and whether the gold at Fort Knox backing up the certificates will be audited. Yet there have been no requests by the Chairman  to the Treasury for an audit of the gold.This I find very odd. The Chairman calls for a major investigation of what can only be an historical point of interest but fails to seek out any confirmation on a point that would be of vital interest to many present day Americans.

 

In this very building, deep in the underground vaults, sits billions of dollars of gold, held by the Federal Reserve  for foreign governments. The Federal Reserve gives regular tours of these vaults, even to school children. [14] Yet, America's gold is off limits to seemingly everyone and has never been properly audited. Doesn't that seem odd to you? If nothing else, does anyone at the Fed know the quality and fineness of the gold at Fort Knox?

 

In conclusion, it is my belief  that from start to finish  the Fed is a failure. I believe faulty methodology is used, I believe that  the justification for the Fed, to bring price and economic stability, has never been a success. I repeat, prices since the start of the Fed have climbed by 2,241% and there have been over the same period 18 recessions. No one seems to care at the Fed about the gold supposedly backing up the gold certificates on the Fed balance sheet. The emperor has no clothes.  Austrian Business cycle theorists are regularly ignored by the Fed, yet they have the best records with regard to spotting overall downturns, and further they specifically recognized the developing housing bubble. Let it not be forgotten that in 2004, two economists here at the New York Fed wrote a paper [15] denying there was a housing bubble. I responded to the paper [16] and wrote:

 

The faulty analysis by [these] Federal Reserve economists... may go down in financial history as the greatest forecasting error since Irving Fisher declared in 1929, just prior to the stock market crash, that stocks prices looked to be at a permanently high plateau.

 

Data released just yesterday, now show housing prices have crashed to  2002 levels.

 

I will now give you more warnings about the economy.

 

The noose is tightening on your organization, vast amounts of money printing are now required to keep your manipulated economy afloat. It will ultimately result in huge price inflation, or,  if you stop printing, another massive economic crash will occur. There is no other way out.

 

Again, thank you for inviting me. You have prepared food, so I will not be rude, I will stay and eat.

 

Let's have one good meal here. Let's make it a feast. Then I ask you, I plead with you, I beg you all, walk out of here with me, never to come back. It's the moral and ethical thing to do. Nothing good goes on in this place. Let's lock the doors and leave the building to the spiders, moths and four-legged rats.


No comments:

Post a Comment