A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Monday, April 25, 2011

saveyourassetsfirst3

saveyourassetsfirst3


Parabolic Silver: No Profit Taking Yet

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:58 AM PDT

Amalgamator submits:
It's the hot topic of the moment, and everyone is offering an opinion, so I'll be succinct. The question I am asking myself is, do I want to take partial profits on silver here?
I don't want to take full profits and get out of the silver market, because, as per my previous analysis, I believe the secular commodities bull has 2 more years to run, silver will see $120 and gold at least $2000. The biggest gains for precious metals will be made in this secular finale. Furthermore, moving to cash is risky given that fiat money is losing value measured in 'real money'. So I want to maintain a long position until I see evidence building for a secular conclusion, but I have to expect that silver will see some jolts to the downside on its way to higher prices. So, is a correction imminent?
The Daily Sentiment

Complete Story »

It's a Good Time to Consider Insuring Your Portfolio With the VIX

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:41 AM PDT

James Duade submits:

Talking about catastrophe is never fun, but avoiding the conversation can leave you unprepared and vulnerable. Worse it can lead to rash decision making if catastrophic events do occur. Preparing for a potential catastrophe is generally most successfully done when we are calm and clear headed. Furthermore, it is typically a good idea to purchase insurance during these placid periods in order to hedge ourselves against potential future storms. In this instance the future storms that loom over the US stock market and the US dollar--at least in the short term--are the end of QE2 this Summer, and the potential outcomes of the debt ceiling debate. The object of this article is not to discuss political ideology, but rather to discuss the potential negative outcomes from these two events, and a possible way to hedge a market collapse using VIX call options, or VIX ETNs like the iPath S&P 500


Complete Story »

Monday Options Recap

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:41 AM PDT

Frederic Ruffy submits:

Sentiment

Stocks are trading mixed in slow trading Monday. The underlying tone seemed a bit cautious early ahead of a busy week of earnings reports. Kimberly Clark (KMB) and Johnson Controls (JCI) are among a handful of names that reported Monday morning. Both are trading lower on the results. The latest New Home Sales report failed to stir much excitement. It showed improvement to 300,000 in March, from 270,000 the month before. Economists were looking for 280,000. The data failed to stir the market. Record highs in gold and a 3 percent rally in silver is getting some attention. But overall, market action has been somewhat lackluster. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 25 points, but the tech-heavy NASDAQ gained 5. The CBOE Volatility Index (.VIX) added 1.04 to 15.73. Trading in the options market is light, with 6.1 million calls and 4.4 million puts traded so far.

Bullish


Complete Story »

The Silver Trade Is Taking Off

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:38 AM PDT

Glen Bradford submits:

There you have it folks: new all-time highs for Silver:

Silver is now hitting all-time highs instead of 52-week highs. At this point, the rumor-mongering and fear-mongering should start heating up. You are going to hear rumors like the SLV ETF is a fraud. These are rumors. To the best of my research ability, SLV is real and actually has the amount of silver that they say they have.

In fact, over the last several years, the ETFs for silver have taken a lot more silver deposits than withdrawals as evidenced by the chart below:

A look back in time - 1980.
So, what we have is very similar to back when the Hunt Brothers cornered the Silver market, except this time is a tad different. Instead of just a small group of people out there trying to protect themselves from the inflation caused by money printing and higher gas


Complete Story »

Fed's Dual Mandate: Pump Up Stocks and Make the Dollar Worthless?

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:27 AM PDT

Nicholas Southwick Levis submits:

So, for the past six months the happily employed workers and Liberal voters have been reveling in the fact that their hero, President Barack Obama, has backed their "hipster" social issues, rendering free market capitalism as passe and in its place the era of the low brow working proletariat has taken its place as the hero of modern day Americana. Many argue that we now live in a Banana Republic because there is no middle class anymore. It's everyone against the upper crust of society these days, and public policy is certainly making this worse by the day. The poor don't understand currency trading or central bank debasement, so they just blame it all on the rich.

Gone is the prestige that came from earning a solid living through hard work and in has come the idea that in life there are the overlords (which everyone hates patriotically) and the


Complete Story »

Ways to Profit From the End of QE2

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:12 AM PDT

Glen Bradford submits:

What happens when QE2 ends? Here are my thoughts. I think that if you look at the only commodity with a PhD in economics, Dr. Copper, you're looking at a commodity that has been telling you for months that commodity prices could be topping. In my opinion, when QE2 ends, the risk-off trade should start to become profitable and sustain its profitability through the summer. Although I am a believer in Peak Oil, I think Oil Prices are extended to the upside. That said, they likely will continue to go higher until they break consumers' backs like they did in 2008.


Right now, I'm Surfing Silver and Gold for landslide profits. That said, I think that this is starting to get into bubble territory and I'm actively looking for any reason that I can find to take off the trade, at which point that I'll actively look for significant weakness


Complete Story »

Some dand people are just born to step in it.

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 04:53 AM PDT

So the guy goes out on his little piece of property with just a fargin pick and a metal detector.

So he finds a four ounce nugget.

Hey, fun!

Looks around, picks up a TEN ounce nugget.

Gee, this is easy.

Oh, lookit there where I dropped my pick:



Gee, gold mining ain't so hard -- that is an EIGHT POINT TWO POUND NUGGET

:s9:

Dow Theorys Russell figures out that gold is manipulated

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 04:18 AM PDT

GATA

Paging Blythe, SLV calls volume gone full retard, we have a problem, paging Blythe

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 04:10 AM PDT

Smart money still piling into a higher price for May. I dont even see people hedging with puts now.

Goldrunner: “$52 to $56 Silver by Mid-year” Update

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 04:01 AM PDT

Back on February 18th I wrote an editorial showing that Silver could rocket up to $52 to $56 by mid-year. At the time of the writing Silver was sitting a little above $32 on the price chart. The original chart work was based off of the fractal chart work I do with Silver from previous fractal time periods. So far the rise in Silver appears to be right on track for our expected targets to be approached into mid-year. [Let me review the details with you.] Words: 1069

Why Bank and Debt Crises are Helping the Gold and Silver Prices

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 03:47 AM PDT

Hell has frozen over - Denninger changes his spots?

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 03:45 AM PDT

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=184915

Gold And Silver Are Money!

Really! Yes, you'll have to listen to understand the argument, if you don't already.

But that's what good radio is, right?

4:00 Central Today, 4/25, at http://blogtalkradio.com/marketticker

_______________________________

This one I will have to listen to.

Silver price reaches new all-time record high

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 03:40 AM PDT

Vietnam to ban gold as legal tender

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 03:39 AM PDT

Doug Casey – Debunking Anti Gold Propaganda

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 01:26 AM PDT

Debunking Anti-Gold Propaganda

A meme is now circulating that gold is in a bubble and that it's time for the wise investor to sell. To me, that's a ridiculous notion. Certainly a premature one.

It pays to remain as objective as you can be when analyzing any investment. People have a tendency to fall in love with an asset class, usually because it's treated them so well. We saw that happen, most recently, with Internet stocks in the late '90s and houses up to 2007. Investment bubbles are driven primarily by emotion, although there's always some rationale for the emotion to latch on to. Perversely, when it comes to investing, reason is recruited mainly to provide cover for passion and preconception.

In the same way, people tend to hate certain investments unreasonably, usually at the bottom of a bear market, after they've lost a lot of money and thinking about the asset means reliving the pain and loss. Love-and-hate cycles occur for all investment classes.

But there's only one investment I can think of that many people either love or hate reflexively, almost without regard to market performance: gold. And, to a lesser degree, silver. It's strange that these two metals provoke such powerful psychological reactions – especially among people who dislike them. Nobody has an instinctive hatred of iron, copper, aluminum or cobalt. The reason, of course, is that the main use of gold has always been as money. And people have strong feelings about money. Let's spend a moment looking at how gold's fundamentals fit in with the psychology of the current market.

What Gold Is – and Why It's Hated
Let me first disclose that I've always been favorably inclined toward gold, simply because I think money is a good thing. Not everyone feels that way, however. Some, with a Platonic view, think that money and commercial activity in general are degrading and beneath the "better" sort of people – although they're a little hazy about how mankind rose above the level of living hand-to-mouth, grubbing for roots and berries. Some think it's "the root of all evil," a view that reflects a certain attitude toward the material world in general. Some (who have actually read St. Paul) think it's just the love of money that's the root of all evil. Some others see the utility of money but think it should be controlled somehow – as if only the proper authorities knew how to manage the dangerous substance.

From an economic viewpoint, however, money is just a medium of exchange and a store of value. Efforts to turn it into a political football invariably are a sign of a hidden agenda or perhaps a psychological aberration. But, that said, money does have a moral as well as an economic significance. And it's important to get that out in the open and have it understood. My view is that money is a high moral good. It represents all the good things you hope to have, do and provide in the future. In a manner of speaking, it's distilled life. That's why it's important to have a sound money, one that isn't subject to political manipulation.

Over the centuries many things have been used as money, prominently including cows, salt and seashells. Aristotle thought about this in the 4th century BCE and arrived at the five characteristics of a good money:

  • It should be durable (which is why, say, wheat isn't a good money – it rots).
  • It should be divisible (which is why artwork isn't a good money – you can't cut up the Mona Lisa for change).
  • It should be convenient (which is why lead isn't a good money – it just takes too much to be of value).
  • It should be consistent (which is one reason why land can't be money – each piece is different).
  • And it should have value in itself (which is why paper money leads to trouble).
  • Of the 92 naturally occurring elements, gold (secondarily silver) has proved the best money. It's not magic or superstition, any more than it is for iron to be best for building bridges and aluminum for building airplanes.

Of course we do use paper as money today, but only because it recently served as a receipt for actual money. Paper money (currency) historically has a half-life that depends on a number of factors. But it rarely lasts longer than the government that issues it. Gold is the best money because it doesn't need to be "faith-based" or rely on a government.

There's much more that can be said on this topic, and it's important to grasp the essentials in order to understand the controversy about whether or not gold is in a bubble. But this isn't the place for an extended explanation.

Keep these things in mind, though, as you listen to the current blather from talking heads about where gold is going. Most of them are just journalists, reporters that are parroting what they heard someone else say. And the "someone else" is usually a political apologist who works for a government. Or a hack economist who works for a bank, the IMF or a similar institution with an interest in the status quo of the last few generations. You should treat almost everything you hear about finance or economics in the popular media as no more than entertainment.

So let's take some recent statements, assertions and opinions that have been promulgated in the media and analyze them. Many impress me as completely uninformed, even stupid. But since they're floating around in the infosphere, I suppose they need to be addressed.

Misinformation and Disinformation

Gold is expensive.
This objection is worth considering – for any asset. In fact, it's critical. We can determine the price of almost anything fairly easily today, but figuring out its value is as hard as it's ever been. From the founding of the U.S. until 1933, the dollar was defined as 1/20th of an ounce of gold. From 1933 it was redefined as 1/35th of an ounce. After the 1971 dollar devaluation, the official price of the metal was raised to $42.22 – but that official number is meaningless, since nobody buys or sells the metal at that price. More importantly, people have gotten into the habit of giving the price of gold in dollars, rather than the value of the dollar in gold. But that's another subject.

Here's the crux of the argument. Before the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, a $20 bill was just a receipt for the deposit of one ounce of gold with the Treasury. The U.S. official money supply equated more or less with the amount of gold. Now, however, dollars are being created by the trillion, and nobody really knows how many more of them are going to be shazammed into existence.

It is hard to determine the value of anything when the inch marks on your yardstick keep drifting closer and closer together.

The smart money is long gone from gold.
This is an interesting assertion that I find based on nothing at all. Who really is the smart money? How do you really know that? And how do you know exactly what they own (except for, usually, many months after the fact) or what they plan on buying or selling? The fact is that very few billionaires (John Paulson perhaps best known of them) have declared a major position in the metal. Gold and gold stocks, as the following chart shows, are only a tiny proportion of the financial world's assets, either absolutely or relative to where they've been in the past:

Gold is risky.
Risk is largely a function of price. And, as a general rule, the higher the price the higher the risk, simply because the supply is likely to go up and the demand to go down – leading to a lower price. So, yes, gold is riskier now, at $1,400, than it was at $700 or at $200. But even when it was at $35, there was a well-known financial commentator named Eliot Janeway (I always thought he was a fool and a blowhard) who was crowing that if the U.S. government didn't support it at $35, it would fall to $8.

In any event, risk is relative. Stocks are very risky today. Bonds are ultra risky. Real estate is in an ongoing bear market. And the dollar is on its way to reaching its intrinsic value.

Yes, gold is risky at $1,400. But it is actually less risky than most alternatives.

Gold pays no interest.
This is kind of true. But only in the sense that a $100 bill pays no interest. You can get interest from anything that functions as money if it is lent out. Interest is the time premium of money. You will not get interest from either your $100 or from your gold unless you lend them to someone. But both the dollars and the gold will earn interest if you lend them out. The problem is that once you make a loan (even to a bank, in the form of a savings account), you may not even get your principal back, much less the interest.

Gold pays no dividends.
Of course it doesn't. It also doesn't yield chocolate syrup. It's a ridiculous objection, because only corporations pay dividends. It's like expecting your Toyota in the driveway to pay a dividend, when only the corporation in Japan can do so. But if you want dividends related to gold, you can buy a successful gold mining stock.

Gold costs you insurance and storage.
This is arguably true. But it's really a sophistic misdirection to which many people uncritically nod in agreement. You may very well want to insure and professionally store your gold. Just as you might your jewelry, your artwork and most valuable things you own. It's even true of the share certificates for stocks you may own. It's true of the assets in your mutual fund (where you pay for custody, plus a management fee).

You can avoid the cost of insurance and storage by burying gold in a safe place – something that's not a practical option with most other valuable assets. But maybe you really don't want to store and insure your gold, because the government may prove a greater threat than any common thief. And if you pay storage and insurance, they'll definitely know how much you have and where it is.

Gold has no real use.
This assertion stems from a lack of knowledge of basic chemistry as well as economics. Yes, of course people have always liked gold for jewelry, and that's a genuine use. It's also good for dentistry and micro-circuitry. Owners of paper money, however, have found the stuff to be absolutely worthless hundreds of times in many score of countries.

In point of fact, gold is useful because it is the most malleable, the most ductile and the most corrosion resistant of all metals. That means it's finding new uses literally every day. It's also the second most conductive of heat and electricity, and the second most reflective (after silver). Gold is a hi-tech metal for these reasons. It can do things no other substance can and is part of the reason your computer works so well.

But all these reasons are strictly secondary, because gold's main use has always been (and I'll wager will be again) as money. Money is its highest and best use, and it's an extremely important one.

The U.S. can, or will, sell its gold to pay its debt, depressing the market.
I find this assertion completely unrealistic. The U.S. government reports that it owns 265 million ounces of gold. Let's say that's worth about $400 billion right now. I'm afraid that's chicken feed in today's world. It's only a quarter of this year's federal deficit alone. It's only half of one year's trade deficit. It represents only about 5% of the dollars outside the U.S. The U.S. government may be the largest holder of gold in the world, but it owns less than 5% of the approximately 6 billion ounces above ground.

From the '60s until about 2000, most Western governments were selling gold from their treasuries, working on the belief it was a "barbarous relic." Since then, governments in the advancing world – China, India, Russia and many other ex-socialist states – have been buying massive quantities.

Why? Because their main monetary asset is U.S. dollars, and they have come to realize those dollars are the unbacked liability of a bankrupt government. They're becoming hot potatoes, Old Maid cards. But the dollars can be replaced with what? Sovereign wealth funds are using them to buy resources and industries, but those things aren't money. And in the hands of bureaucrats, they're guaranteed to be mismanaged. I expect a great deal of gold buying from governments around the world over the next few years. And it will be at much higher dollar prices.

High gold prices will bring on huge new production, which will depress its price.
This assertion shows a complete misunderstanding of the nature of the gold market. Gold production is now about 82.6 million ounces per year and has been trending slightly down for the last decade. That's partly because at high prices miners tend to mine lower-grade ore. And partly because the world has been extensively explored, and most large, high-grade, easily exploited resources have already been put into production.

But new production is trivial relative to the 6 billion ounces now above ground, which only increases by about 1.3% annually. Gold isn't consumed like wheat or even copper; its supply keeps slowly rising, like wealth in general. What really controls gold's price is the desire of people to hold it, or hold other things – new production is a trivial influence.

That's not to say things can't change. The asteroids have lots of heavy metals, including gold; space exploration will make them available. Gigantic amounts of gold are dissolved in seawater and will perhaps someday be economically recoverable with biotech. It's now possible to transmute metals, fulfilling the alchemists dream; perhaps someday this will be economic for gold. And nanotech may soon allow ultra-low-grade deposits of gold (and every other element) to be recovered profitably. But these things need not concern us as practical matters in the course of this bull market.

You should have only a small amount of gold, for insurance.
This argument is made by those who think gold is only going to be useful if civilization breaks down, when it could be an asset of last resort. In the meantime, they say, do something productive with your money…

This is poor speculative theory. The intelligent investor allocates his funds where it's likely they'll provide the best return, consistent with the risk, liquidity and volatility profile he wants to maintain. There are times when you should be greatly overweight in a single asset class – sometimes stocks, sometimes bonds, sometimes real estate, sometimes what-have-you. For the last 12 years, it's been wise to be overweight in gold. You always want some gold, simply because it's cash in the most basic form. But ten years from now, I suspect that will be a minimum. Right now it's a maximum. The idea of keeping a constant, but insignificant, percentage in gold impresses me as poorly thought out.

Interest rates are at zero; gold will fall as they rise.
In principle, as interest rates rise, people tend to prefer holding currency deposits. So they tend to sell other assets, including gold, to own interest-earning cash. But there are other factors at work. What if the nominal interest rate is 20%, but the rate of currency depreciation is 40%? Then the real interest rate is minus 20%. This is more or less what happened in the late '70s, when both nominal rates and gold went up together. Right now governments all over the world are suppressing rates even while they're greatly increasing the amount of money outstanding; this will eventually (read: soon) result in both much higher rates and a much higher general price level. At some point high real rates will be a factor in ending the gold bull market, but that time is many months or years in the future.

Gold sentiment is at an all-time high.
Although gold prices are at an all-time high in nominal terms, they are still nowhere near their highs in real terms, of about $2,500 (depending on how much credibility you give the government's CPI numbers), reached in 1980. Gold sentiment is still quite subdued among the public; most of them barely know it even exists.

Some journalists like to point out that since there are a few (five, perhaps) gold dispensing machines in the world, including one in the U.S., that there's a gold mania afoot. That's ridiculous, although it shows a slowly awakening interest among people with assets.

Journalists also point to the numerous ads on late-night TV offering to buy old gold jewelry (generally at around a 50% discount from its metal value) as a sign of a gold bubble. But this is even more ridiculous, since the ads are inducing the unsophisticated, cash-strapped booboisie to sell the metal, not buy it.

You'll know sentiment is at a high when major brokerage firms are hyping newly minted gold products, and Slime Magazine (if it still exists) has a cover showing a golden bull tearing apart the New York Stock Exchange. We're a long way from that point.

Mining stocks are risky.
This is absolutely true. In general, mining is a horrible business. It requires gigantic fixed capital expense to build the mine, but only after numerous, expensive and unpredictable permitting issues are handled. Then the operation is immovable and subject to every political risk imaginable, not infrequently including nationalization. Add in continual and formidable technical issues of every description, compounded by unpredictable fluctuations in the price of the end product. Mining is a horrible business, and you'll never find Graham-Dodd investors buying mining stocks.

All these problems (and many more that aren't germane to this brief article), however, make them excellent speculative vehicles from time to time.

Mineral exploration stocks are very, very risky.
This is very, very true. There are thousands of little public companies, and some are just a couple steps up from a prospector wandering around with a mule. Others are fairly sophisticated, hi-tech operations. Exploration companies are often classed with mining companies, but they are actually very different animals. They aren't so much running a business as engaging in a very expensive and long-odds treasure hunt.

That's the bad news. The good news is that they are not only risky but extraordinarily volatile. The most you can lose is 100%, but the market cyclically goes up 10 to 1, with some stocks moving 1,000 to 1. That kind of volatility can be your best friend. Speculating in these issues, however, requires both expertise and a good sense of market timing. But they're likely to be at the epicenter of the gold bubble when it arrives – even though few actually have any gold, except in their names.

Warren Buffett is a huge gold bear.
This is true, but irrelevant – entirely apart from suffering from the logical fallacy called "argument from authority." But, nonetheless, when the world's most successful investor speaks, it's worth listening. Here's what Buffett recently said about gold in an interview with Ben Stein, another goldphobe: "You could take all the gold that's ever been mined, and it would fill a cube 67 feet in each direction. For what that's worth at current gold prices, you could buy all – not some, all – of the farmland in the United States. Plus, you could buy 10 Exxon Mobils, plus have $1 trillion of walking-around money. Or you could have a big cube of metal. Which would you take? Which is going to produce more value?"

I've long considered Buffett an idiot savant – a genius at buying stocks but at nothing else. His statement is quite accurate, but completely meaningless. The same could be said of the U.S. dollar money supply – or even of the world inventory of steel and copper. These things represent potential but are not businesses or productive assets in themselves. Buffett is certainly not stupid, but he's a shameless and intellectually dishonest sophist. And although a great investor, he's neither an economist or someone who believes in free markets.

Gold is a religious statement.
Actually, since most religions have an otherworldly orientation, they're at least subtly (and often stridently) anti-gold. But it is true that some promoters of gold seem to have an Elmer Gantry-like style. That, however, can be said of True Believers in anything, whether or not the belief itself has merit. In point of fact, I think it's more true to say goldphobes suffer from a kind of religious hysteria, fervently believing in collectivism in general and the state in particular, with no regard to counter-arguments. Someone who understands why gold is money and why it is currently a good speculative vehicle is hardly making a religious statement. More likely he's taking a scientific approach to economics and thinking for himself.

So Where Are We?
So these are some of the more egregious arguments against gold that are being brought forward today. Most of them are propounded by knaves, fools or the uninformed.

My own view should be clear from the responses I've given above. But let me clarify it a bit further. Historically – actually just up until the decades after World War I, when world governments started issuing paper currency with no relation to gold – the metal was cash, and it was used as money everywhere, on a daily basis. I believe that will again be the case in the fairly near future.

The question is: At what price will that occur, relative to other things? It's not just a question of picking a dollar price, because the relative value of many things – houses, food, commodities, labor – have been distorted by a very long period of currency inflation, increased taxation and very burdensome regulation that started at the beginning of the last depression. Especially with the fantastic leaps in technology now being made and breathtaking advances that will soon occur, it's hard to be sure exactly how values will realign after the Greater Depression ends. And we can't know the exact manner in which it will end. Especially when you factor in the rise of China and India.

A guess? I'll say the equivalent of about $5,000 an ounce of today's dollars. And I feel pretty good about that number, considering where we are in the current gold bull market. Classic bull markets have three stages. We've long since left the "Stealth" stage – when few people even remembered gold existed, and those who did mocked the idea of owning it. We're about to leave the "Wall of Worry" stage, when people notice it and the bulls and bears battle back and forth. I'll conjecture that within the next year we'll enter the "Mania" stage – when everybody, including governments, is buying gold, out of greed and fear. But also out of prudence.

The policies of Bernanke and Obama – but also of almost every other central bank and government in the world – are not just wrong. These people are, perversely, doing just the opposite of what should be done to cure the problems that have built up over decades. One consequence of their actions will be to ignite numerous other bubbles in various markets and countries. I expect the biggest bubble will be in gold, and the wildest one in mining and exploration stocks.

When will I sell out of gold and gold stocks? Of course, they don't ring a bell at either the top or the bottom of the market. But I expect to be a seller when there really is a bubble, a mania, in all things gold-related. There's a good chance that will coincide to some degree with a real bottom in conventional stocks. I don't know what level that might be on the DJIA, but I'd think its average dividend yield might the

China's shocking weekend announcement: Proposes to dump the majority of its dollar holdings

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 01:06 AM PDT

From Zero Hedge:

All those who were hoping global stock markets would surge based on a ridiculous rumor that China would revalue the CNY by 10% will have to wait. Instead, China has decided to serve the world another surprise.

Following last week's announcement by PBoC Governor Xiaochuan that the country's excessive stockpile of U.S. dollar reserves has to be urgently diversified, today we get a sense of just how big the upcoming Chinese defection from the "buy U.S. debt" Nash equilibrium will be.

Not surprisingly, China appears to be getting ready to cut its U.S. dollar reserves by roughly the amount of dollars recently printed by the Fed – $2 trillion or so. And to think, this comes just as news...

Read full article...

More Cruxallaneous:

Doug Casey: What to do with your money now

This weekend's gold news could change everything

No way out: The Federal Reserve is in BIG trouble now

Gold - What to Watch out for in Early May

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 01:00 AM PDT

The "end of the dollar's reign" is no prediction... It's here right now

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 12:53 AM PDT

From Bloomberg:

Timothy Geithner says borrowing more from China to finance tax cuts for the most affluent Americans would be irresponsible.

The Treasury secretary has it backward. The real question is whether Beijing is willing to double down on a nation whose balance sheet makes Italy look good. Holding $1.2 trillion of U.S. debt is a fast-growing risk to China.

Traders have a theory about why the euro is reasonably stable amid a broadening debt crisis: Asian central banks are converting proceeds from recent intervention moves into other currencies. "Asian central banks" has become a euphemism for China, whose reserves now exceed $3 trillion.

China is making deals with nations such as Brazil to conduct trade in yuan. It's also making noises about the Federal Reserve's zero interest-rate policies and Congress playing games with the debt limit. If you were managing China's reserves, how many more dollars would you really want in this environment?

Heck, China is even loading up on Spanish debt these days. "China's open admission of continual purchases of European debt shows it doesn't consider the U.S. any safer," says Simon Grose-Hodge, head of investment strategy for South Asia at LGT Group in Singapore.

America's Sugar Daddy

The risk that America's sugar daddy is getting fed up hasn't escaped U.S. officials. It's probably no coincidence that Fed officials are talking about dismantling their quantitative-easing program, while Washington is homing in on the deficit.

This enough-is-enough dynamic was on display last week as the leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the BRICS economies, met in the Chinese resort city of Sanya. Chinese President Hu Jintao called for reform of our international monetary and financial systems. A commentary by Zheng Xinli may offer a clearer view of what Hu meant.

Zheng, an executive vice president of the China Center for International Economic Exchanges, wrote in China Daily that the "root cause" of the financial crisis was U.S. "long-term abuse" of sovereign credit. He called for the Group of 20 Nations to devise a multicurrency system.

The U.S. takes its AAA credit for granted, knowing that neither Moody's Investors Service nor Standard & Poor's has the bravado to downgrade it. Yet we may now be observing the flipside of the 1971 musing by Nixon-era Treasury Secretary John Connally that the dollar is our currency, but your problem. The dollar may soon be Washington's problem.

Crash Threat

The path was set by Geithner's predecessor, Henry Paulson, who visited China last week. On Paulson's watch, the U.S. morphed into a huge debt-issuing machine. It has remained in overdrive since, and Asia is getting antsy. What if Moody's or S&P grew a backbone and took away America's top rating? What if the dollar crashed?

In recent years, the answer to both questions was Asia; it would always be there come auction time. Until now, this faith made sense. Asia's reserve arms race since 1997 was about keeping exchange rates competitive and avoiding the humiliation of going to the International Monetary Fund for handouts. The trouble is, it's a Faustian bargain.

The reference here is to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's novel "Faust," in which an alchemist makes a deal with the devil. He compromises principles for fleeting gains. That, in a nutshell, is where Asia finds itself as the U.S. re-inflates its economy. Asia is kind of trapped.

Ponzi Scheme

The trillions of dollars stuffed in U.S. debt could fund infrastructure, education and health care back home. Asia can't easily withdraw its savings because that would cause a run on U.S. assets, which might put the world's biggest economy back in crisis. Not knowing what else to do, Asia buys more and more dollars. Ponzi scheme, anyone?

Asia must now decide to continue gambling on U.S. debt or cuts its losses. The $886 billion Japan parked in U.S. debt would come in handy to rebuild its earthquake-devastated northeast. Any sign Japan is drawing down its pot would send shockwaves through markets. Ditto for oil-exporting nations facing people-power revolts.

China, too, is worried about Middle East-style protests, and heading off inflation is vital to taming the masses. Billionaire George Soros last week called Chinese inflation "somewhat out of control." In March, inflation accelerated to the fastest pace since 2008.

China's Call

Accumulating dollars exacerbates the problem as it pumps up China's money supply. Buying fewer would help boost the yuan and give policy makers more control over the economy.

It's China's call, though, and that's a big risk for the U.S. It should worry officials in Washington that speculation Friday about Chinese rate increases had investors rushing into the safety not of dollars, but yen. For some, the risks of quake aftershocks and radiation leaks in Japan seem more manageable than folks playing politics with America's debt-borrowing ceiling.

As Geithner worries about paying for stimulus, he should remember that it's not really Washington's call. The decision will be made by America's banker 7,000 miles away, and he may be having doubts.

(William Pesek is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

To contact the writer of this column: William Pesek in Tokyo at wpesek@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this column: James Greiff at jgreiff@bloomberg.net.

More on China:

Donald Trump: China is "looking to strip us of everything"

Yesterday's most important news you heard nothing about

A huge oil story you haven't heard: Chinese oil giant is halting all exports

Watch the dollar for signs the rally in precious metals is ending

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 12:48 AM PDT

From The TSI Trader:

From the inception of gold's secular bull market in 2001, gold has completed six ABCD wave patterns, which I have graphically detailed on my website. This precious metal is now in the final process of completing its seventh C-wave, which characteristically concludes with parabolic bravura.

I thought it would be interesting to examine the concluding weeks of the preceding six C-waves for some insight into how our current situation might play out, and I decided to use the vehicle of the U.S. Dollar for this study.

It turns out, each and every one of gold's previous C-waves concluded simultaneously with a precipitous drop in the U.S. Dollar index. And as the U.S. Dollar has recently taken out two key support levels and appears to have begun the swift crash process last week, it is not a likely coincidence that gold has moved decisively above $1,500, and appears headed for $1,600 in the month ahead...

Read full article...

More on the U.S. dollar:

Marc Faber: The U.S. dollar is headed to "zero"

A massive U.S. dollar selloff could be starting now

This could be the most contrarian trade in the world today

Shanghai gold exchange raises silver forward margins

Posted: 25 Apr 2011 12:21 AM PDT

Shanghai gold exchange raises silver forward margins

The Shanghai gold exchange said it has raised the level of deposit required for its silver forward contract by 3% to curb excessive speculation

Posted: Monday , 25 Apr 2011



SHANGHAI (Reuters) -
The Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) said it had raised the level of deposit required for its silver forward contract by 3 percent and may roll out further measures to curb excessive speculation and manage price volatility.

The SGE said margins on its silver [Ag (T+D)] forward contract had been raised to 15 percent from April 25 compared with the previous 12 percent, according to a notice posted on its website (www.sge.sh).

The SGE also it would raise from Tuesday the daily price limit for the contract, which has a lot size of one kilogram, to 8 percent over or under the previous session's settlement from the previous 7 percent.

"Should the market continues to show signs of overheating, the exchange will implement other measures such as raising the deferred rates to improve risk controls," it said.

The SGE's silver forward contract has soared in recent months in line with the meteoric rise in the U.S. silver futures contract. It was up 5.5 percent at 10,652 yuan ($1,637) a kilogram at 0624 GMT, bringing its gains so far this month to 33.6 percent.

The most active U.S. silver futures contract SIcv1 surged by more than 5 percent to a 31-year high at $48.51 an ounce on Monday, in a broad rally in precious metals.

There are 35.2 ounces in one kilogram.

SGE also offers two spot contracts which trade silver of 99.90 percent and 99.9 percent purity. ($1 = 6.507 yuan)

http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/...ail&id=110649

SO Silver is in a Bubble ...and

Posted: 24 Apr 2011 11:50 PM PDT

Apple computer @ $ 350.70 and Google @ $ 525.10 are both screaming buys according to the Wall St Guru's. Give me a break!!

Gold and Silver Set Record Highs on China Buying Bets, Oil Eyes April Top

Posted: 24 Apr 2011 10:43 PM PDT

Gold and Silver Set Record Highs on China Buying Bets, Oil Eyes April Top

Monday, April 25, 2011

by Ilya Spivak of DailyFX

Gold and silver prices shot to new record highs amid reports that China will invest some of its $3 trillion in foreign exchange reserves in assets including precious metals.

Commodities – Energy

Crude Oil Sets Sights on April High

WTI Crude Oil (NY Close): $112.29 // +0.84 // +0.75%

Prices are on pace to test the April 11 high at $113.44, a barrier reinforced by support-turned-resistance at a rising trend line set from the lows in mid-February, with a breakout to the upside exposing the $115.00 figure. Initial support lines up at $109.37, the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement of the 3/16-4/11 advance.

Risk sentiment trends remain in focus, with short-term correlation studies pointing to the strongest link between the WTI contract and the MSCI World Stock Index in four months (0.71). With that in mind, S&P 500 stock index futures are pointing higher ahead of the opening bell on Wall Street, hinting the path of least resistance favors the upside over the near term.

With that in mind, a sharp rise in Treasury yields ahead of this week's 2-, 5-, and 7-year bond sales amid fears that the recent S&P downgrade of the US' credit outlook will boost borrowing costs may prove to weigh on sentiment. Therefore, traders will keep an eye on Monday's sale of $56 billion in 3- and 6-month paper to set the tone for longer-term maturity auctions later in the week.




Gold, Silver Set Record High on China Buying Bets

Spot Gold (NY Close): $1506.85 // +0.60 // +0.04%

Prices gapped higher through resistance at $1508.95, the 200% Fibonacci extension of the 3/7-3/15 downswing, to challenge the top of a rising channel in place since mid-March. A break above this boundary exposes the 238.2% Fib at $1533.44. The 200% Fib level has been recast as near-term support.

Precious metal prices soared in overnight trade following a report from Century Magazine that claimed China plans to invest some of its more than $3 trillion in FX reserves in various assets including energy and precious metals. PBOC chief ZhouXiaochuan has said the current build-up has exceeded "reasonable" levels, while independent reports have pegged the "right" amount of FX reserves for China at no more than $1.3 trillion.

On balance, this hints a substantial amount of capital is due to enter commodity markets, suggesting prices will continue to press higher over the near term as traders returning from the long holiday weekend digest overnight news-flow.


Spot Silver (NY Close): $47.25 // +0.65 // +1.40%

Prices gapped above resistance at the top of a rising channel in place since late January, setting a new record high at $49.78. The metal is now in uncharted territory, making forecasting decidedly difficult, but deeply overbought relative strength studies suggest the threat of reversal is increasingly high. The channel top, now at $46.91, stands as near-term support.

The short-term directional correlation between gold and silver remains firm, suggesting the two metals will continue to move along the same trajectory. The gold/silver ratio has set a new record low however, meaning the cheaper metal is likely to continue outperforming its more expensive counterpart.


For real time news and analysis, please visit http://www.dailyfx.com/real_time_news

To receive future articles by email, please contact Ilya at ispivak@dailyfx.com

Commodity and Futures Prices in Perspective: Price Manipulation or a Confluence of Ev

Posted: 24 Apr 2011 10:39 PM PDT

Commodity and Futures Prices in Perspective: Price Manipulation or a Confluence of Events
Monday, April 25, 2011

by Fred Oltarsh of Libanman Futures

The futures markets are roaring and a presidential investigation is making the news. Price Fixing seems pretty unlikely. I'd like to see an investigation which examines open interest and determines that a single company or group of companies manipulated the price of Crude Oil in the Futures Markets. More likely, the producers of oil have been able to manufacture and distribute a reasonable amount of Crude Oil and a confluence of world events has established prices at these levels. Crude Oil is not the only market where lofty prices exist. In fact, looking at Charts dating back 30 years, it appears that the following markets are trading at levels that, if nothing else, are not likely to be sustained for a considerable length of time. Coffee, Cotton, Corn, Gold and Silver all appear to have prices so significantly above their mean levels (mean as calculated by my own convoluted methodology) that trading at these levels for long periods of times seems unlikely. Each of these contracts has had significant run-ups in the past and the move has been followed by a significant correction. Thirty years of data and it's clear that markets trade around some type of longer-term level. While it is clear that these markets are experiencing enormous run-ups, it is unclear when they will revert to more appropriate levels for that commodity. Obviously picking the timing of market tops or bottoms is a very difficult thing to do. Looking at the Chart later and it appears obvious that the particular market could not maintain that price level.

The Coffee market, for example, has traded near current levels about four times since the 1980s, each time, however, the rally was squashed and prices fell precipitously to around the $1.50 level. While Coffee, in all cases traded substantially below the $1.50 level, a look at a "reasonable level" of $1.50 provides a price point that might be considered fair. It is neither at the highs on the chart nor the lows but at a level where there is significant long-term congestion. The fact that Commodities are priced in U.S. Dollars and they all trade on the World Market entices one to believe that the Dollar Price of Commodities should be adjusted for the current value of the U.S. Dollar. It is on this basis that I compare Current Prices to a Congestion Mean Price and adjust the Price for the U.S. Dollar's weakness. The idea is that while prices trade at extreme levels, over time they revert to levels that are relatively consistent in the long-term. Commodities such as Silver, Gold and to a lesser extent Crude Oil, are currently trading at levels that are unlikely to be maintained over a long period of time. The Table below lists the Expected Level of Prices based on the hypothesis that by examining the Current Price and Establishing a Congestion Mean Price which dominates much of the commodities long-term trading action and adjusting that price by 12% based on the weakness of the Dollar, we create an Expected Value for the Commodity to trade at in the relatively near future.

Current Congestion Expected
Commodity Price Mean Level
Coffee 2.9455 2.0000 2.2400
Corn 7.445 5.0000 5.600
Cotton 1.6751 1.0000 1.1200
Crude Oil 112.75 80.00 89.60
Gold 1503.80 800.00 896.00
Silver 46.077 20.00 22.40
$ Vs. Euro 1.4555 1.3000 NA


go here for his table:
http://insidefutures.com/article/261...%20Events.html

My blog, $50 silver, and the death of the $US dollar

Posted: 24 Apr 2011 10:37 PM PDT

Note: Weather Unit, News Unit, Silverbull-are are now down to 2 posts a DAY on all posts I make please, many requests for me to delete you since half the post are your posts with links to your blog. I will not warn again I will just delete. $50, big deal we are still $70 away from even being adjusted for inflation. Dollar tried to rally to 75 and failed miserably. You should see TINKA and

No comments:

Post a Comment