A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Saturday, January 1, 2011

Gold World News Flash

Save Your ASSets First

Gold World News Flash


Gold Seeker Weekly Wrap-Up: Gold Ends the Year at a New All-Time High and Silver Closes at a New 30-Year High

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:00 PM PST

Gold steadily rose throughout most of world trade and ended near its last minute high of $1420.90 with a gain of 1.1% at a new all-time closing high. Silver followed a similar pattern and ended near its last minute high of $30.933 with a gain of 1.35% at a new 30-year closing high.


In The News Today

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 02:51 PM PST

View the original post at jsmineset.com... December 31, 2010 11:18 AM Dear CIGAs, Snow is no problem in Sharon, CT. In a town with less than 3000 residents, I am the guy in the suit. Jim Sinclair’s Commentary I received a great compliment from a former Forbes reporter who now works for the Times. He called to remind me that when he wrote an article about me on December 10th, 2001 I had told him gold would go to $1650 and that Bear Sterns would go broke on OTC derivatives.   Jim Sinclair’s Commentary Have you subscribed? The meat is in the full reports and is much more than these one liners. Here is how John Williams sees things. - 2010: A Year of Depressed Economic Stagnation - 2011: A Year of Increasing Economic and Systemic Difficulties - Gold Outperforms Dow for Seventh Straight Year (2010) "No. 342: Economic, Market and Systemic Outlook for 2011" Web-page: [URL]http://www.shadowstats.com[/URL] Jim Sinclair’s Commentary In ...


Jim?s Mailbox

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 02:51 PM PST

View the original post at jsmineset.com... December 31, 2010 11:09 AM Jim Sinclair’s Commentary CIGA Lew wishes all his CIGAs a happy New Year in this very interesting video. Click here to watch the video…   Jim, You called muni bonds a while back. Meredith Whitney thinks so in 2011. CIGA BIG Tatanka.   Dear LT, People forget the 10-20+ percent bear raids on gold that were the rule of the day years ago, the hammering of RGLD, the synthetic dollar short BS, Central bank selling and so on. They would do almost anything to shake us out of our positions… You have again been the most charismatic leader in my opinion in the gold bull market! You have also shown us by example how to control emotions and to remain rational so as not to screw things up. I am wishing you the best in 2011 for health, happiness and prosperity to you and your family! Your friend, CIGA BT   Jim Sinclair’s Commentary CIGA Giancarlo in Joberg observes "This ...


The Gold Price New All Time High at $1,421.10, Silver Price New High Since 1980

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 01:42 PM PST

Gold Price Close Today : 1,421.10
Gold Price Close 23-Dec : 1,380.00
Change : 41.10 or 3.0%

Silver Price Close Today : 3091
Silver Price Close 23-Dec : 2931
Change : 160.00 or 5.5%

Gold Silver Ratio Today : 45.98
Gold Silver Ratio 23-Dec : 47.08
Change : -1.11 or -2.4%

Silver Gold Ratio : 0.02175
Silver Gold Ratio 23-Dec : 0.02124
Change : 0.00051 or 2.4%

Dow in Gold Dollars : $ 168.35
Dow in Gold Dollars 23-Dec : $ 173.37
Change : $ (5.01) or -2.9%

Dow in Gold Ounces : 8.144
Dow in Gold Ounces 23-Dec : 8.387
Change : -0.24 or -2.9%

Dow in Silver Ounces : 374.42
Dow in Silver Ounces 23-Dec : 394.86
Change : -20.44 or -5.2%

Dow Industrial : 11,573.42
Dow Industrial 23-Dec : 11,573.49
Change : -0.07 or 0.0%

S&P 500 : 1,257.52
S&P 500 23-Dec : 1,256.77
Change : 0.75 or 0.1%

US Dollar Index : 79.173
US Dollar Index 23-Dec : 80.490
Change : -1.32 or -1.6%

Platinum Price Close Today : 1,768.60
Platinum Price Close 23-Dec : 1,714.60
Change : 54.00 or 3.1%

Palladium Price Close Today : 802.00
Palladium Price Close 23-Dec : 754.10
Change : 47.90 or 6.4%

The GOLD PRICE burst through the last high at $1,415.90, gobbled up $15.50 and closed Comex at $1,421.10, a new all-time high close. Silver added 42.2c for another new high close since 1980 at 3091c.

Minimum targets are $1,475 gold and 3400c silver. Maximum targets are $1,600 and 3700c SILVER PRICE (maybe 3900c).

Laugh at me if you like, but you will see these prices, and with your own eyes.

Today's prices are, obviously, the YEAR END PRICES. Please save these prices for your records if you need to make year end statements.

Today's meditation ponders price versus value.

Often people ask me to quote a price, and when I do, they reply tartly, "I can get it cheaper at so-and-so!" And very sweetly, I reply, "Then you ought to go buy it from them." Conversation ended.

Why? Because some folks don't understand the difference between value and price. For example, you can buy pasteurized, homogenized, completely dead generic milk at Wal-Mart for $1.50 or $2.00 a gallon, or, you can buy nutritious, living and life-giving, wholesome raw milk from your local farmer for $8.00 a gallon.

I know which is cheapest, but which is more valuable? Which do you want to drink? Which do you want your children to drink?

After burying so many corpses from customers who have been cleaned out by Goldline, numismatic boiler rooms, etc., I know that the little commission I charge is worth every cent, because if I do nothing more than keep you out of the hands of the piranhas, I will save you ten times what you pay me. Or, I will take your mess and shift you to something that will rise more quickly and add to that swapping and recover what you've lost and move you ahead of the game. Merely by guiding you to the less expensive coins I can save you $20 - $40 per ounce of gold, or $3 per ounce of silver. After 30 years dealing in gold and silver, I've learned the value of trustworthiness, and I know that the little commission I charge doesn't cost, it pays.

All sorts of Internet shops and newcomers aspire to be the Wal-Mart of gold and silver. I don't. When you buy from them, you get no information on market direction, no guidance about what is your best buy, no long term outlook, no strategy, only a price and (you hope) the goods. If price is all you want, go get it, with my blessing and no hurt feelings.

We face the same challenge on our farm, where we raise and sell grass-fed beef and lamb and pasture-raised chickens and pork. Why do we charge $3.45 a pound for chickens when it costs $0.99 at Kroger? Taste and see, and you will pay. Real food tastes so much better, and nourishes your body so much more efficiently and deeply, that it's worth what you have to pay.

Price and value aren't the same.

This self-destructive cheapness doesn't stop at food. It has teamed up with corporate greed to ship our neighbors' jobs overseas. Everybody rushes to buy junk made in China by dollar an hour sweatshop labor, never stopping to recall that our own prosperity depends on our neighbour's. We are each other's customers, and our brothers' keepers. Besides, that's the only practical course. Every time you try to get something (or somebody's labor) for nothing, you end up getting nothing for something.

John Ruskin summed it up in the 19th century, and he's still right: "There is scarcely anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse, and sell a little more cheaply. The person who buys on price alone is this man's lawful prey."

I found a lesson years ago that delivers your mind from the fear and torture of greed, and I don't doubt that it will work for everyone. It's the only accounting system that really profits. As long as you're afraid you won't get yours, you'll end up cheating yourself.

"Give, and it shall be given unto you: good measure, pressed down, and shaken together, and running over, shall men give into your bosom. For with the same measure that you measure with it shall be measured back to you." Luke 6:38.

Now to today's markets:

Behold! In markets nothing is written in stone, so even the most reliable indicators can send false signals. However, they are called "reliable" because generally, they are.

Thus with today's higher than last high close on gold, followed by several new highs for the move for silver, the odds overwhelmingly favor much higher silver and gold prices and a rally. Might it abort? Sure, there's maybe a 5% chance of that, but a 95% chance they are moving higher. Every investor has to teach himself to go with the main chance, the primary trend, and never to draw to an inside strait, the least-likely outcome.

The US DOLLAR INDEX broke that 79.40 support today and crashed to a low of 78.775 -- ouch! It spiked to a bottom today, and climbed back out, but this probably won't last. This leaves us looking for a new target, 78.80 to 78.30, and even including the 50 DMA at 79.06. RSI and MACD are also pointing down.

What meaneth this portent? A declining dollar helps stocks and silver and gold. Many of the hopeful are counting on the presidential cycle to bail out stocks this year (they usually rise in the third year of a presidential term because the scumbag in office is trying to get prices up before his re-election bid). This time 'round they may be surprised.

Yet let's hear the bottom line: declining dollar or not, stocks remain in a primary downtrend or bear market. Therefore however much a sick dollar may help them, silver and gold (in a primary bull market or upward trend) will strongly outpace them. Proof of stocks' inability to keep pace with a hyperinflation (let alone the inflation we are witnessing) can be found in Constantino Bresciani- Turroni's classic examination of the hyperinflation in Germany. In spite of huge nominal gains then, stocks actually lost value.

Today stocks twisted in confusion. All indices but the Dow dropped, but the Dow managed to rise a magnificent 3.71 points to 11,573.42. S&P500 gave up -0.36 to land at 1,257.52.

On this day in 1781 the first "modern" bank in the US was organized by Robert Morris, the Bank of North America, by the Confederation Congress, just to prove that wherever there is a government, however weak and tottering, some bankster parasite will emerge to wrest a charter and privilege from it. The folks behind the Bank of North America, including Hamilton, wanted to make it the de facto central bank of the US, like the Bank of England, but it wasn't quite adequately capitalized. So the banksters came up with a scheme to fool people into believing in its financial soundness. They only had a few bags of silver coin, but they hired three men to hoist the bags up from the cellar in a dumb waiter. Then they would noisily unload them from the dumbwaiter onto a dolly, and just as noisily push them across the lobby of the bank for all the customers to see. It was eventually succeeded by the First Bank of the United States, having been unable to plant the eggs of its tapeworm into the national gut.

During the Twelve Days of Christmas (Christmas thru Epiphany, 6 Jan) our office will be working only four hours a day. Please be patient, leave a voice mail or send us an email at helpdesk@the-moneychanger.com.

Thanks for your understanding.

May God bless you all in 2011 and always!

Y'all enjoy your weekend.

Argentum et aurum comparenda sunt -- -- Gold and silver must be bought.

- Franklin Sanders, The Moneychanger
The-MoneyChanger.com
Phone: (888) 218-9226 or (931) 766-6066

© 2010, The Moneychanger. May not be republished in any form, including electronically, without our express permission.

To avoid confusion, please remember that the comments above have a very short time horizon. Always invest with the primary trend. Gold's primary trend is up, targeting at least $3,130.00; silver's primary is up targeting 16:1 gold/silver ratio or $195.66; stocks' primary trend is down, targeting Dow under 2,900 and worth only one ounce of gold; US$ or US$-denominated assets, primary trend down; real estate in a bubble, primary trend way down. Whenever I write "Stay out of stocks" readers inevitably ask, "Do you mean precious metals mining stocks, too?" No, I don't.


Free Shares on Constantine Metal Resources

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 12:55 PM PST

As we close out the year, our Vulture Bargain #6, Constantine Metal Resources (TSX:CEM.V or CNSNF) has traded to and through our stated target to go "Free Shares" or FS....


Why does NY Fed need all these private meetings with investment bankers?

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 12:22 PM PST

8:21p ET Friday, December 31, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Zero Hedge's pseudonymous Tyler Durdan yesterday took a good crack at the many private meetings held with Wall Street investment bankers by the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, William Dudley. Of course the Fed's secrecy and favoritism are primary targets of GATA's work, even as most mainstream financial analysts and gold market analysts have no curiosity about what the Fed might be doing in secret. The Zero Hedge commentary is headlined "Why Does Brian Sack Interact With Goldman's 'FX Committee'?" and you can find it at Zero Hedge here:

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/why-does-brian-sack-interact-goldmans-f...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Opportunity in the gold coin market

Swiss America Trading Corp. alerts GATA supporters to an opportunistic area of the gold coin market. While the gold bullion market has been quite volatile lately and as of November 29 gold has risen only $7 per ounce over the last month, the MS64 $20 gold St. Gaudens coin has risen about 10 percent in the same time. The ratio between the price of these coins and the price of gold is rising. If you'd like to learn more about the ratio and $20 gold coins, Swiss America can e-mail you a three-year study of it as well as other information.

Swiss America also can provide a limited number of free copies of "Crashing the Dollar," a book written by Swiss America's president, Craig Smith.

For information about the ratio between the $20 gold pieces and the gold price and for a free copy of "Crashing The Dollar," please call Swiss America's Tim Murphy at 1-800-289-2646 X1041 or Fred Goldstein at X1033. Or e-mail them at trmurphy@swissamerica.com and figoldstein@swissamerica.com.



Join GATA here:

Yukon Mining Investment e-Conference
Wednesday-Thursday, January 19-20, 2011

http://theyukonroom.com/yukon-eblast-static.html

Vancouver Resource Investment Conference
Vancouver Convention Centre West
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Sunday-Monday, January 23-24, 2011

http://cambridgehouse3.com/conference-details/vancouver-resource-investment-conference-2011/15

Cheviot Asset Management Sound Money Conference
Guildhall, London
Thursday, January 27, 2011

http://www.cheviot.co.uk/news/video/2010/12/the-cheviot-sound-money-conf...

Phoenix Investment Conference and Silver Summit
Renaissance Glendale Hotel and Spa
Glendale, Arizona
Friday-Saturday, February 18-19, 2011

http://cambridgehouse3.com/conference-details/phoenix-investment-confere...

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy Drills 71.17 Metres of 0.52 percent NiEq
(0.310 percent Nickel 0.466 g/t PGMs +Au and 0.223 percent copper)
from surface at Wellgreen Project in the Yukon

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX-V: PCY) reports that it has received additional assays results from its 100-percent-owned Wellgreen PGM Ni-Cu property in the Yukon, Canada. Diamond drill holes WS10-179 to WS10-182 were drilled during the summer of 2010 by Northern Platinum (which merged with Prophecy on September 23, 2010). WS10-183 was drilled by Prophecy in October 2010. Highlights from the newly received assays include 71.17 metres from surface of 0.52 percent NiEq (0.310 percent nickel, 0.466 g/t PGMs + Au, and 0.233 percent copper) and ended in mineralization. For more drill highlights, please visit:

http://prophecyresource.com/news_2010_nov29.php



Happy New Year!

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 11:15 AM PST

2011Year of the RPGThat's Rocket Propelled Gold, or as Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank suggests, Reference Point Gold. Same outcome either way.The Year in Musical ReviewAs some of you may have noticed, I often put a song at the end of my posts. Generally it is both a song that I like, and one that in some way relates to the post. And now I present a few memories from what I consider


The Best of Times...

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 10:43 AM PST

Copper has now traded to at all-time highs in notional terms. On an inflation adjusted basis that puts red metal pricing at the level of a century ago in US Dollar terms. That helps support our take that 20th century pricing was more ... Read More...



The Best of TimesÂ….

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 10:26 AM PST

From the December 2010 Hard Rock Analyst Dispatch David Coffin & Eric Coffin, HRA Advisories Copper has now traded to at all-time highs in notional terms. On an inflation adjusted basis that puts red metal pricing at the level of a century ago in US Dollar terms. That helps support our take that 20th century pricing was more of an anachronism than the past decade of gains. Some are now suggesting the big gap in copper supply could come sooner than we had assumed. That has helped recent gains, but we are still cautious about the near term as high prices bring more inventories to the system. Gold and silver are also being well supported at these higher levels. They will be more influenced by US$ moves than copper, and at this point it appears the US Dollar should hold its own against the Euro. Another area of support for metals has been coming from inflation concerns in the growth economies. That may increasingly become the best gauge for metal price direction i...


FRIDAY Market Excerpts

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 10:09 AM PST

Gold ends year with record closing high

The COMEX February gold futures contract closed up $15.50 Friday at $1421.40, trading between $1404.60 and $1422.00

December 31, p.m. excerpts:
(from RTTNews)
bull gold marketGold futures rallied, closing a blockbuster year in characteristic fashion as the dollar continued to struggle versus other major currencies. Concerns about inflation and mounting fiscal pressures in the US and Euro area made gold a red-hot investment in 2010. Gold soared roughly 30%, or $325 in the past year, and many analysts predict it will extend record highs if the Federal Reserve follows through with its $600 billion quantitative easing plan…more
(from Dow Jones)
Currency concerns have been a major factor funneling investment funds towards the yellow metal throughout 2010. Sovereign debt worries in Europe and large stimulus spending in the U.S. resulted in a particularly volatile year for both the euro and the dollar. That left investors seeking safe-harbor in gold, which is often seen as an alternative currency. Gold has also benefited from global inflation concerns, with Chinese investors ramping up their gold purchases throughout 2010 amid escalating inflation rates…more
(from Reuters)
Gold rose to within $10 of a record high on Friday, closing out an unprecedented tenth annual gain as the combination of a weaker dollar and global economic uncertainty seemed to pave the way higher next year. U.S. February gold futures settled 2010 at $1,421.40 an ounce, up 1.1%, and marked a 29.7% gain over 2009′s settlement when the active gold contract ended at $1,096.20 on the COMEX. Friday's gains were spurred by the dollar's broad decline against a basket of currencies…more
(from Marketwatch)
The dollar index eased to 79.02 from 79.51 in late Thursday trading in North America, but the index is still up roughly 1.5% for the year. The dollar fell 0.3% against the Japanese yen, hitting ¥81.24, down about 12.7% on the year. The euro rose solidly to $1.3369, up from $1.3290 late Thursday. Despite the rise, the euro is still down about 7% versus the dollar in 2010, hurt in particular by worries about eurozone countries' balance sheets…more
(from Bloomberg)
Gold priced in euros, British pounds and Swiss francs rose to all-time highs this year as the European Union bailed out Greece and Ireland. "Gold has done so well this year because government activity indicates record deficits, low interest rates and an obvious lack of fiscal discipline," said Tom Winmill, who manages the Midas Fund. "The U.S. monetary policy will lead to a devaluation in the dollar, and all eyes are focused on the next default in the European community."…more
(from TheStreet)
Looking ahead to next year, many gold bulls are calling for the yellow metal to surpass $1,600 an ounce. Darin Newsom, senior commodities analyst at Telvent DTN, said that midway through January gold prices may begin to test the record high — $1,432.50 — reached earlier in December … there's more than enough economic and political uncertainty in the world, Newsom said, that investors will almost certainly continue to burnish gold's status as the best safe haven available…more

see full news, 24-hr newswire…


Zero Hedge's Top 10 Most Popular Posts In 2010

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 10:00 AM PST


As we wrap up 2010, the last thing left to do is to recall the stories that generated the most buzz on Zero Hedge. With stories touching on everything from the flash crash, to JPM's silver market manipulation, to the scramble for physical metals, to capital controls, to the manipulated (and successful) push to get Americans out of Money Market accounts, here are the top to stories of the past year (and stunningly all click-bait, slideshow free).

  • In tenth place, with 80,842 reads, "The Hindenburg Omen has Arrived" is the story that Zero Hedge brought to the surface as soon as the H.O. was confirmed on August 12, and ended up making waves for the balance of the summer. According to some, it was the concerns about the Hindenburg Omen's self fulfilling prophecy that cemented the Chairman's resolve to proceed with the Wood's Hole speech two weeks later on August 27, which made QE2 a certainty.
  • In ninth place, with 80,942 reads, "MUST HEAR: Panic And Loathing From The S&P 500 Pits" is the definitive, and most visceral, recollection of the terror that had gripped each and every single momo trader as the Dow briefly dropped by 1,000 points on May 6. One thing is certain: as the SEC has taken absolutely no proactive steps to address the conditions that generated the record Dow drop, this is just the first of many "flash crashes" for US stocks.
  • In eighth place, with 82,232 reads, posted on February 11, and long before it became apparent just how insolvent Europe was, "Just How Ugly Is The Sovereign Default Truth? How Self Delusions Prevent Recognition Of Reality" - our summary of Dylan Grice's phenomenal analysis on the cognitive dissonance when it comes to that last bastion of backstops: sovereign insolvency. The analysis is even more relevant now than it was almost a year ago and we urge readers go through it one more time now that its argument has been fully borne out.
  • In seventh place, read 82,297 times, and appearing almost a year ago, "This Is The Government: Your Legal Right To Redeem Your Money Market Account Has Been Denied" discussed the government's stealthy plans to force ordinary US citizens and corporations to force the move of as much money as possible out of money markets and into riskier asset classes. That that particular plan relied on the embedded concern of capital lock ups, was not surprising. What is also not surprising is that with outflows of $392 billion in 2010, money markets were the primary source of capital for US institutional and retail investors. Mission accomplished Paul Volcker, Group of 30.
  • At number 6, read by 84,368 people, Gordon Gekko's guest post: "It's Going To Implode: Buy Physical Gold - NOW" needs no introduction. Despite starting a brief blog war, those who actually listened to Gekko's advice, made a 25% return in 9 months. Nuf said.
  • Holding number 5, and making waves with 89,743 readers is the recent revelation that JP Morgan, contrary to conventional wisdom, and in line with "conspiracy thinking" admitted Bart Chilton's allegations via FT sources that indeed it had accumulated a major silver short position, which subsequently has been rumored to have moved to offshore, and to non-CFTC regulatable entities, presumably out of the orient. The full piece is here "Water, Meet Blood - JP Morgan Admits To, Reduces Massive Silver Short Position, Proves Millions Of Conspiracy Theorists Correct."
  • At number 4, with just a few extra reads at 89,791, another tangent of the manipulation ploy was revealed when we learned that "Canada's Only Bullion Bank Gold Vault Is Practically Empty" It is only very ironic that earlier today we noted that ScotiaMocatta's electronic store is now out of all silver bars.
  • At number 3 in the most popular list, with 91,571 reads, and rounding off the trifecta of precious metal manipulation posts, is the one that started it all: "Whistleblower Exposes JP Morgan's Silver Manipulation Scheme" - there is no need to recap this particular post.
  • In the first runner up spot, with 93,320 reads, was Gonzalo Lira's essay on possible hyperinflation catalysts "Guest Post: How Hyperinflation Will Happen". The popularity of this post was only matched by the firestorm of angry responses it engendered within the deflationist camp in the blogosphere.
  • And in the top spot, it is not surprising that the expose on the intersection of disappearing civil rights and financial prohibitions should garner the most reads in 2010 with 172,155 reads, "It's Official - America Now Enforces Capital Controls" The title is self-explanatory.

All in all, it was a very interesting year, with the oligarchy doing everything in its power to retain the perception it was in control even as the walls were crumbling all around it. We are confident this encroaching central planning process will continue in 2011, this time with far worse odds for that ultimate backstopper of the global bankster system: the US taxpayer.


Bill Gross Telling Bloomberg To "Avoid Dollar Denominated Government Debt" Probably Means Bond Rout Is Over

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 08:57 AM PST


When Nassim Taleb and Marc Faber say that US government debt is a suicide investment, one can be allowed some skepticism. After all, they are likely just talking their book. On the other hand, when the manager of the world's biggest bond fund, whose flagship fund Treasury holdings amount to almost $80 billion goes on Bloomberg and says to "avoid dollar-denominated government debt" better known as US Treasuries, and instead recommends viewers invest in "stable" currencies like the Peso, the BRL or the CAD, then you know the bottom in bonds is in. So in addition to dumping fixed rate bonds (which means Pimco will again be able to buy on the cheap ahead of QE3, which as Larry Meyer has by now likely advised Pimco is a sure thing), Gross also told Bloomberg that his other two strategies are to buy floating rate debt (over fixed), and lastly recommend credit spreads over interest rate duration risk. For those who find something troubling with a $1 trillion fixed income manager talking down his investments, and are still wondering whether or not QE3 is coming, we suggest putting one and one together. And while at it, they should also consider that Pimco now holds over $100 billion in MBS: a notional amount last held just as QE1 was announced.

full clip after the jump.


Gold Daily and Silver Weekly Final Charts for 2010

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 08:21 AM PST


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Guest Post: Just Where Is The Equity In All Of This?

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 07:38 AM PST


From the Contrary Investor

Just Where Is The Equity In All Of This?

Little Dent In The Story?...Recently demographer Harry Dent and Dave Rosenberg have been discussing the fact that as we look ahead over the next 12 years or so, the 45-55 year old population segment in the US is set to decline.  It's the population wave coming after the boomers and before the gen-xer's.  Of course, and as the graph below so eloquently displays, following the boomers in terms of a population bubble is one hard act as you can see what the boomers did to the 45-55 year old population segment in terms of growth from the early 1980's until literally now.
            


For anyone who has been a demographics devotee, this should not be new news at all.  As you know, Dent has made a very nice living as demographer and financial market commentator, basing his ongoing economic and financial market outlook on forward demographics.  To be honest, there is a lot of validity in his approach and we suggest his comments be included as one tool in the greater toolbox of longer term decision making.  As both Dent and Rosenberg have recently pointed out, and as the graph above unmistakably presents, the last time we saw a decline in the 45-55 year old US population segment was from the mid-1970's to the early 1980's.  Specifically, this population group peaked in March of 1973 and then troughed in July of 1983 before literally exploding higher until just recently when we have again seen yet another peak for now.  Dent expects a steady 45-55 year old population segment decline into the 2021-22 period.  Both Dent and Rosenberg suggest investors focus in on this fact intently as it's the 45-55 year old age bracket that is the largest consumer segment, the largest investor segment, etc.  If indeed nominal body count decline lies ahead, then just what does that say for the US economy and financial asset prices that theoretically are a reflection of the real economy? 

In the following table, we basically singled out the period described above of covering the peak and trough of this population segment in the 70's and 80's.  And what we are looking at is the increase in real US GDP over the 3/74 to 7/83 period.  For a bit of compare and contrast, we took equivalent roughly nine year periods both before and after this population slowdown to see what real GDP growth looked like when the 45-55 year old crowd was a growing population segment.  Do you think Dent and Rosenberg have a point germane to investment decision making?  Of course they do.

No wonder Dent is so uber bearish, right?  To make matters a bit more somber, you may remember back to our "You Dream Of Columbus" discussion in September.  One of the key themes we were trying to get across in that commentary was that as long as the US Government is levering up, there will be a downward bias to US GDP growth, exactly as we have seen in Japan for a few decades now.  So, it appears we have demographics and financial gravity telling us to expect economic volatility and fragility looking out over the next decade.

Although we believe the Dent and Rosenberg driven analysis above is very much to be taken into decision making consideration ahead (and we will), we are not bringing this up to regurgitate what both of these analysts have already said regarding the projected character of the domestic economy ahead.  In fact, you don't want to know what Dent is saying, to be honest.  He sounds a lot like Bob Prechter in terms of forward equity index targets.  Just remember that when Dent was bullish decades ago also due to demographics, he put huge targets on the equity indices that were never reached.  Not even close.  In fact, we never even made it half way to his targets for equity indices.  So for now we take the downside nominal price targets with a grain of salt.  For now.  And in no way do those prior equity market targets that never came to be negate the fundamental message of how demographics can shape both domestic economic and financial market outcomes.

Before really getting to the heart of this discussion, one last data point concerning the 45-54 year old US population.  The chart below is a quick peek at current unemployment circumstances for this group.  We're looking at the number of folks in this age demographic that have been unemployed now for half a year to a year.  At least over the history of the numbers, we've never seen anything like this in any prior cycle.  Also, a bit of the reconciliation you see lately is more a result of folks falling off of unemployment benefit rolls as opposed to finding jobs.  Just another log on the fire of demographic consideration?  You bet.

The point of this discussion is to veer off into a bit of a different compare and contrast exercise relating directly to US equities.  At the very worst, we hope we are asking the right questions.  Point blank, what does history have to say about how equities may react when the 45-55 year old population goes into decline over the next decade plus?  If indeed real GDP growth slows meaningfully as has been the case so far into the current recovery cycle, perhaps compounded by the fact that Government leveraging by necessity will only put more downward pressure on economic growth, what influence will that have on equity valuations, etc.?  And lastly, are there any important differences between the period of the mid-1970's through early 1980's relative to our present cycle circumstances, and if so how will these differences potentially impact US financial markets ahead?

Let's start with a quick look back at the S&P during the period where we last saw the 45-55 year old US population go into multi-year decline.  It's exactly what you see below and we have marked the points of 45-55 year old population peak and trough experience on the S&P chart itself.

Very quickly, did the equity market discount the temporary lull in population growth for this very economically important demographic segment?  You better believe it did.  As is clear, equities peaked in late 1972, a year before the 44-55 population segment peaked in what had been continuous growth up to that point.  In like manner, the S&P bottomed for the final time in mid-1982 just prior to blasting off into one of the greatest US equity bull markets of all time.  This was exactly one year before the 45-55 year old population segment bottomed.  Like equities, growth in the 45-55 segment then blasted off into the greatest growth in the 45-55 year old age bracket in the history of the US .  The boomer bulge bracket is all too familiar a story and central to Dent's prognostications.  So, the wonderful efficient equity market that discounted this demographic shift a year in advance of both the peak and trough showed us equity prices that went absolutely nowhere for a decade (late 1972 through mid-1983) as this demographic segment lull in growth occurred.  No wonder Dent is so somber about the next decade, right?  Yep, this is pretty much the Dent story.  So what can we expect ahead?  Yet another range bound equity market that has really already been the case over the last 12 years?  Another lost decade so we can join the Japan economic and financial market fan club?

Just Where Is The Equity In All Of This?...In contemplating just how forward demographics will potentially influence equity markets ahead, just one more quick qualitative look back.  Remember, in the early 1970's, the baby boom generation was just warming up in terms of how they would profoundly influence both the real economy and financial markets.  With the enactment of ERISA in 1974, corporations and government entities were now being mandated to provide retirement benefits for this explosive demographic group that was to blossom over the years ahead, along with pension contributions.  So in 1974, we were then staring at the next three and one half decades of corporations, and ultimately individuals, acting to fund retirement pools of assets in a one way street characterization of cash flows.  You know the story, this was a generational headwind demand for broad based equity "consumption" (purchasing) unrivaled in US history.  With ERISA also came the introduction of the IRA vehicle that was yet another non-pension related source of equity demand, all of this coming together in simultaneous fashion.  And as the baby boomers matured and their wages accelerated, equities became close to a national pastime over the next quarter century.  That one time demographic and legislated driven demand for retirement asset purchases rode the path of the ever aging boomer that at this point is not so much any longer interested in accumulation, but rather how this thirty five years of asset accumulation will be spent down in retirement years.  Exactly the same can be said for pension plans, especially defined benefit plans.  After all, corporations have zero interest in over funding defined benefit plans as from an actuarial basis they would love the last nickel in plan assets to be paid out five seconds before the last boomer breathes their last. 

In addition to demographically driven demand for equities vis-`-vis the largely ERISA driven retirement mandate, the boomers also helped herald in the greatest credit cycle expansion the US has ever experienced.  We've covered this so many times, you know exactly how this very positively influenced economic outcomes over the 1980-2000 period.  This was the landscape that lay before us in the early 1970's during the first 45-55 year old population downturn.  Fast forward to today and this virtuous set of circumstances for both the economy and financial asset demand has just about been completely turned on its proverbial head.  The generational credit cycle has peaked.  Probably the last thing the 45-55 year old population needs to do today is to take on more debt.  In case you have not been with us over the last few years, credit cycle dynamics are now an economic boat anchor around the neck of the economy, with the focal point being US households.  Secondly, with the downturn in household net worth and the generational collapse in interest rates, those boomers who hoped to retire on their savings and earn perhaps a safe 5% rate of return are now wondering just how they could have been so wrong.  Terrified, they are faced with the reality of spending both earnings and principal in their retirement years.  We believe it is very fair to say so many folks simply never saved enough and came to count on equity and residential real estate price appreciation until the hereafter.  As the boomers age, they will now draw down defined benefit plan assets, IRA's, 401(k)'s, etc.  The one way street of contributions will reverse to become steady distributions in the decades ahead.  As mentioned, 180 degrees from the circumstances faced in 1973.  Is this about to have a dramatic impact on financial assets tomorrow?  Hardly.  This is big macro and will play out over decades.  But it tells us that the buy and hold macro of baby boomer and pension plan accumulation years is well behind us.  A different era macro simply calls for a different investment decision making game plan.  It's not the end of the world by a long shot.

Okay, here come the charts.  Hope you are ready.  We'll make this quick.  We want to review the current composition and character of the component owners of US equities as of 1Q 2010 numbers.  Where are the liquidation risks ahead given the clear need of the boomers to monetize these assets in the decades ahead?  As of right now, ownership of US equities can be characterized by the chart below.  As seen, households and mutual funds are the two largest equity owners.  Remember, households include the Warren Buffet's (although his equity has theoretically been gifted), Larry Ellison's, etc. of the world.  Is there a lopsided skew here?  You bet there is.  But between households and equity mutual funds, you are looking at over 55% of total publicly traded US equity ownership.  And it's households that represent the bulk of mutual fund ownership.  Will at least some of this be liquidated in the years ahead to fund living needs?  Absolutely.  Although we'll come back to this in a minute, we really want to focus in on the institutional owners of US equities.  As we see it, these will be the most at risk sellers of US equities in the decades that lie in front of us.  Collectively, private and public pension funds as well as insurance companies (think annuities) own 25% of the current US equity market. Will they in 10 or 20 years?  Doubtful.  And perhaps more importantly, to whom will they sell?


                   
It's not just the question of potential liquidation that looms a bit large right now.  Also very important to the discussion is the question of whether this collective group of significant equity buyers of the last three plus decades will be important buyers ahead?  As we see it, a few will not.  The chart below look sat current equity ownership of US households.  We're looking at their asset allocation here, if you will, as we measure US equities as a percentage of total household assets.  For now, US households are very near their long term average exposure.  But the important question ahead is will they again ramp up equity buying relative to alternative financial assets, especially since the folks with most of the money (boomers) are entering retirement years where they cannot afford to lose anymore than has already been the case over the last decade plus?  You can see the character of the generational cycles of household equity ownership over time.  It would be our bet that returning to prior asset allocation peaks is out of the question any time soon.  You already know we've seen consistent equity mutual fund sales over what is close to the last 30 weeks, rallies or no rallies.  Have households simply had it with the volatility?  Sure could be.  Thank you SEC and Administration for turning a clearly determined blind eye to how electronic trading has recharacterized short term equity market outcomes.
            


Foreign ownership of US equities as a percentage of total financial assets has been very steady between 15-20% really over the last close to the last four decades.  Although this may sound wild, if we had to pick a constituency that just might end up being an important buyer of US equities ahead, this would be it.  Why?  Because we expect many emerging nations to ultimately travel down the path of social benefit creation the US has walked over the last three to four decades.  And if so, they may indeed be interested in large blue chip US equities that are essentially in many cases global mutual funds in and of themselves.  After all, so many global blue chips have global name recognition.  Plus, we certainly expect household disposable income to rise meaningfully in the emerging nations in the decades ahead.  We'll just have to see what happens ahead, but this may be a bright spot.

The next five charts are really the focal point for this discussion.  Below we are looking at the "institutional" holders of US equities.  We're talking insurance companies and private and public pension funds.  They have ridden the boomer wave of asset accumulation and will necessarily be buffeted by forward retirement living expense payouts and distributions in the decades ahead.  If there is to be a sourced headwind for US equities ahead, these folks would be ground zero.  After an almost uninterrupted three to four decades of accumulation of financial assets, we're about to move right into distribution mode.  The top clip of the chart below covers insurance companies in aggregate (life and PC), but by far the largest exposure here is life companies.  Just think variable annuities.  As the boomers ramped up retirement savings into the equity bull market, insurance company exposure to equities close to doubled in the prior fifteen years relative to the five prior decades.  As annuities are drawn upon in the years ahead, just where do you think this ratio will go?  As the boomers age, we'd personally expect a return at least to the longer term average.  And that assumes equities do not experience serious price trouble along the way.  Distributions and payouts alone could drive the ratio back to the longer term average.  These folks are certainly a source of equity liquidation ahead.          


              
An absolutely major issue for the pension industry as a whole in the US is under funding of plan assets.  For the private sector under funding will be reconciled out of corporate earnings over time.  You can see in the bottom clip above the history of total nominal dollar private sector pension assets.  As of now, we're just not that far away from where we stood in 1999.  Ten years and not a lot of growth means very large under funding potential.  Important why?  Because if equity prices do not "behave" ahead, private pension sponsors may be quick to pull the plug on volatile equities.  Why risk a deeper under funding hole at the expense of sacred reported earnings?  You know these folks used to be considered longer term investors.  With the baby boomers aging by the day that is definitively no longer the case.  Private pension fund equity exposure seen below in the top clip is just a touch misleading.  Although the ratio appears pretty darn steady over the last four decades with a recent drop off more than apparent, underneath change has surely been afoot.  Alternative asset exposure in the relatively progressively thinking private pension world has grown markedly.  Is private equity also equity?  Sure it is, but you won't see it below.  How about hedge exposure?  You bet.  You get the picture.  The true reality of equity exposure here is higher than you see.  If there is to be a very meaningful seller ahead, this would be our pick.  Why?  Most private sector pension plans are defined benefit.  As mentioned, by academic definition these should be self liquidating as the boomers ultimately age and leave us.  As wild as this may sound, private sector pension plans may be a distant memory in thirty or forty years.  So what will happen to these assets?  Are you kidding?  They will be sold.  As of the second quarter of this year, private pension funds were holding $1.67 trillion of US equities.  That's about 9% of the total US equity market.
                


It has been estimated that pension under funding at the State and Local muni level is near $3 trillion as we speak.  We fully expect a government bail out at some point.  But given that level of current under funding risk, just look at how exposed these folks are to equities as seen in the bottom clip of the chart above!  They are the last folks that can tolerate a severe and prolonged downturn from here.  Let's just hope a lot of these folks do not take Harry Dent's newsletter.  If they do, they have not been sleeping for quite some time.  These assets are clearly at risk of liquidation due to payout and distributions over time.  Exposure at the end of 2Q 2010?  $1.45 trillion.  Public and private pension funds are sitting on $3.1 trillion of equities as of mid-year.  These are the very folks who will be liquidating to pay out benefits in the next few decades.  Moreover, looking ahead at actual payouts and realizing a glaring under funding exists in public pension plans, the State and muni entities have a number of choices.  Put up the cash to fully fund the plans - not feasible.  Use existing pension assets and muni general fund assets to make payments ahead - not likely as per the general funds kicking in so early in the pension payout game.  Fund payouts solely out of plan assets, risking deeper under funding ahead - bingo, near term choice of fiscal expediency.  You get the picture. States and municipalities will liquidate plan assets prior to digging into general fund assets.  To the point, public pension funds have much greater under funding problems than is the case with the private sector at the moment.  And the public sector is also under the most fiscal pressure as we speak.  Does having such a high allocation to equities only heighten State and municipal solvency issues?  Without question.

As mentioned, it's the institutional holders of equities that we need to monitor ahead.  These are the folks who will be liquidating assets to make promised and requested payouts/dist


ScotiaMocatta Sells Out Of Silver Bars

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 07:22 AM PST


And an appropriate story to end 2010 with: ScotiaMocatta, one the world's biggest bullion banks, is now sold out of all silver bars.

Carry on

h/t Omega3ala

 


Gold Trading Closes: Returning 29.7% For the Year, Doubles S&P 2010 Performance

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 06:48 AM PST


Some time in mid/late 2009, after becoming convinced that the stock market is a broken topological nightmare, with feedback loops that are so unpredictable to be virtually "skyNet" self-aware, and is in essence broken, we urged readers to pull all their capital from the stock market. This happened even as we grew increasingly concerned by the Fed's ongoing ruinous actions which anyone but the staunchest propaganda foot soldier realized were going to mean ongoing pain for all dilutable assets, including stocks and fiat currencies. As a result it became abundantly clear that hard assets such as gold, silver, non-nailed down park benches, bananas, hard liquor, stripper poles, and of course strippers, would outperform paper assets. Sure enough, with regard to the first, in May 2010, our skepticism about stocks was confirmed, and anyone who had limit sell orders likely ended up losing up to 40% of their capital with no recourse. Since nothing has changed in stocks, we repeat our warning that the market is at all times a few stray millisecond algos away from total meltdown. And as for gold: the 29.7% 2010 return is double that of the S&P. Which means those who did not play stocks and bought gold did ok. And even those who shorted stocks and bought gold, are still up about 15%. As above, little has changed to weaken our long-term conviction that gold (and silver, for those who can handle the added vol) is the natural antithesis to central banker lunacy. And that we will have a lot more of in 2011. Guaranteed.


New Lows for Gold Silver Ratio

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 06:43 AM PST

Got Gold Report Important index challenging key former “support.” Breakout (breakdown of the ratio) possible if GSR trades below 44. Gold/Silver Ratio Breakdown Watch to begin 2011. HOUSTON -- The gold/silver ratio (GSR) tickled a 45 handle on Wednesday, at one point trading down to 45.69. The GSR closed Wednesday and Thursday at 46.18, the lowest daily close since December 11, 2006 when this important ratio closed at 45.26 after an intra-day dip to 44.73. The 20-year chart just below is in weekly terms so the intra-day lows do not show, but it does highlight that the GSR is flirting with historic, two-decade lows. Indeed we have reached the point in the 20-year charts that has proven to be overwhelming “support” since 1998. (If any of the images are too small click on them for a larger version.) If we weren’t so convinced that the GSR could actually break below the lows of the last two decades, if the news and the rumors we r...


Gold in 2011 Short & Long Term Analysis

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 06:23 AM PST

Super Force Signals A Leading Market Timing Service We Take Every Trade Ourselves! Email: [EMAIL="trading@superforcesignals.com"]trading@superforcesignals.com[/EMAIL] [EMAIL="trading@superforce60.com"]trading@superforce60.com[/EMAIL] Weekly Market Update Excerpt Dec. 31, 2010 Gold and Precious Metals US Dollar Chart US Dollar Analysis: [LIST] [*]The Dollar rally has continued to fail over the last couple of weeks. [/LIST] [LIST] [*]The Fed will print until the dollar is worthless, because that is their business. My richest contacts believe the dollar is going to ZERO within 20 years. [/LIST] [LIST] [*]The Federal Reserve, with the absence of a Gold Standard, is the worst financial system devised by mankind, or should I say, monster-kind. There has never been an audit of the monster, and there is no safety mechanism to limit how much your Fed can print. [/LIST] [LIST] [*]Still, the weak volume on the price decline in the USD over the last few days indicates...


Silver Stocks 4

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 06:20 AM PST

Scott Wright December 31, 2010 1952 Words Commodities have been on a tear in the second half of 2010. Measured by the venerable CCI, the commodities patch has posted record highs in just this last week. In this impressive run the usual suspects have all performed well. From wheat, to oil, to copper, to gold, the gains have been stellar. But one commodity in particular has outshined the rest, silver. From its July low of $17.51, silver has blasted through its 2008 bull high of $20.77 to recently breach the $30 level for the first time in 30 years. This 73% gain in just five months has been simply amazing. And it sure has captured the markets' attention. Even though silver has a tiny capital market relative to other commodities, its staggering gains have warranted face time in the mainstream financial media and have captivated investors. Gun-slinging futures traders, i...


2010 goes out WITH A BANG. What to expect in 2011...

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 06:18 AM PST

Clive Maund Look at the following charts of stocks we have invested in in recent months to see how they have performed before we address the crucial question of whether the time has come to take profits or whether we should stay long for further gains that might be spectacular if gold and silver arc away to the upside. The stocks featured are our best performers and we are still long these stocks - there are others which made gains but did not do so well, some where we took profits too early, like Avino Silver & Gold, and some that we were obliged to dump for mostly slight to moderate losses, and a few low priced issues where we had no stop and the price eroded gradually resulting in sizeable losses, such as Harmony Gold, but overall we have made very substantial gains over the past 6 months, as the following charts attest... Clicking on the name of the stock takes you back to the article in which it was recommended. Note that the percentages shown on the charts are rat...


Silver Mining Is for Suckers

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 06:10 AM PST

By Matt Badiali, editor, S&A Resource Report Friday, December 31, 2010 Mining is for suckers. I've told you this before… and you may think that as the editor of a resource and mining advisory, I've lost my mind saying so. After all, I've recommended plenty of mining companies, and most of my readers love the idea of owning them. But strictly from a business standpoint, mining sucks… First, just the equipment and expertise it takes to look for gold, silver, or copper is expensive. Then if you actually find a big deposit, it can cost more than $1 billion to build a mine. And it can take years to build a mine. That means years before you have anything to sell. Finally, for your efforts, you're selling a commodity just like everyone else's. There's no special brand of gold or uranium. You have no "pricing power" like Apple has with its iPods. You're also subject to crazy swings in the price of your product, which you have no control over. When you get it right, th...


2011 is the Year of the Precious Metals Junior Miners

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 06:09 AM PST

By James West MidasLetter.com December 31, 2010 With gold and silver both boiling ferociously into record territory repeatedly throughout the last half of 2010, the outlook for 2010 looks even more bullish for the monetary metals. Forget the perennially fallacious predictions of the financial mainstream. There's nothing but higher prices for both these metals on the horizon. The reason is elementary. With the United States firmly entrenched in its own death spiral financing, whereby it has no choice but to continuously prop up its crumbling economy with monthly injections of increasingly abundant and therefore declining in value paper dollars as the only means to generate big numbers in the stock market, gold and silver will rise. Even if all of the gold ounces purchased, hoarded and fabricated into jewelry each year were replaced by new discoveries, both gold and silver would keep rising, simply in relative value to the U.S. greenback. Gold is finishing up 2010 with its...


Jim's Mailbox

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 06:09 AM PST

Jim Sinclair's Commentary

CIGA Lew wishes all his CIGAs a happy New Year in this very interesting video.

Click here to watch the video…

 

Jim,

You called muni bonds a while back. Meredith Whitney thinks so in 2011.

CIGA BIG Tatanka.

 

Dear LT,

People forget the 10-20+ percent bear raids on gold that were the rule of the day years ago, the hammering of RGLD, the synthetic dollar short BS, Central bank selling and so on. They would do almost anything to shake us out of our positions…

You have again been the most charismatic leader in my opinion in the gold bull market!

You have also shown us by example how to control emotions and to remain rational so as not to screw things up.

I am wishing you the best in 2011 for health, happiness and prosperity to you and your family!

Your friend,
CIGA BT

 

Jim Sinclair's Commentary

CIGA Giancarlo in Joberg observes "This is like a frog in hot water!"

Bolivians protest fuel price hike
Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:57AM

Thousands of demonstrators have taken to the streets across Bolivia to protest the recent jump in fuel prices in the country.

Protesters marched through the streets in capital La Paz and other cities across Bolivia on Thursday, demanding from the government of President Evo Morales to repeal the hike.

The demonstration in La Paz started peacefully but turned violent after police prevented protesters from entering the main plaza where the presidential palace is located, AP reported.

More…

Petrol price could rise in January
December 29 2010 at 01:04pm

The price of petrol could increase by 25 cents a litre next week on Wednesday due to the rise in the international price of oil since November 26, the latest calculations issued by the state-owned Central Energy Fund released on Wednesday showed.

From December 1, the price of petrol at the coast was set at R8.21 a litre and the inland price was established at R8.45 a litre.

The next change to the local petrol prices will be made on Wednesday, January 5, and will be based on the average over or under recovery in the petrol price from November 26 to December 30.

More…

Fuel price rise adds to inflationary pressure
15 Dec, 2010, 02.03PM IST,REUTERS

MUMBAI: Moves by state-run oil retailers to raise petrol prices and the possibility that diesel will increase too make the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) fight against inflation more difficult and piles more pressure onto a beleaguered government.

Indian Oil Corp , Bharat Petroleum and Hindustan Petroleum will raise petrol prices by about 5.6 per cent this week due to surging global crude prices. Shares in the companies rose early on Wednesday.

The Reserve Bank of India meets this week to review its monetary policy in the light of still high inflation.

More…

Here Comes The Drama
CIGA Eric

BT,

Silver is clearly within a long-term secular up trend. This overrides any short-term technical targets. The silver 'newbies' entering the fray after an undisputed breakout will accelerate the trend. Acceleration implies y=x2 rather than y=mx+b. The addition of the crooked number next to the X will add drama for both sides of the trade.

The observation today, as it was months ago, is growing trend energy. This is illustrated by a dramatic surge in REV(E). A surge in REV(E) suggests accumulation. Markets that are under accumulation are difficult to control. This one is all about control.

Silver ETF (SLV):
clip_image001

Regards,
Eric

More…

Don't Interpret Trend Noise
CIGA Eric

While experts interpret trend noise, they ignore the fact that cycles (TIME) anticipate price. The surge in trend energy, REV(E), suggests that yields on the long bond will continue rising when TIME is right.

30 Year Treasury Index Bear 3x ETF:
clip_image002

Headline: Treasurys slip after unemployment, housing data

Treasury prices slipped a little further Thursday, pushing yields up, after reports showed fewer Americans filing for first-time jobless benefits than economists had forecast and pending home sales higher than predicted.

Analysts noted that most bond investors would treat the session as the last of the year, even though the market is open for a half-day Friday. That will mean a lot of position adjustments and so-called window dressing of portfolios for the end of the month and year, especially after wild swings this week, more than any meaningful indication of the how the data fit into investors' longer-term outlook.

Source: marketwatch.com

More…

Growing Signs of Hyperinflation
CIGA Eric

"Who is more foolish: the fool or the fool that follows him?"

Elimination of lower denomination coins and changing metal composition of coins are clear sign of hyperinflation across the globe. Yet, there is no shortage of experts warning the masses about the threat of deflation.

The threat of deflation is an illusion as the signs of hyperinflation are growing in size and frequency. The pain of monetary reality, however, prevents many from straying too from the comfort of the illusion.

Headline: Soaring metal prices ring death knell for 25p coins

The ubiquitous 25 paise coin will be history in six months' time. Worried by the soaring metal prices, the government has decided to scrap all coins up to the denomination of 25 paise from June 30, 2011, making 50 paise the minimum denomination accepted in markets.

"From this date, these coins shall cease to be a legal tender for payment as well as on account. The minimum denomination coin acceptable for transaction will be 50 paise from that date," said a finance ministry release on Thursday adding that the Reserve Bank of India will separately notify the procedure for calling in the coins.

Source: indianexpress.com

More…

Public to Private Transition: Identify & Adapt
CIGA Eric

Identify and adapt or the markets will kick your ass in 2011.

Yet another transition from public to private sector (cycle) will catch many playing by the old rules.

Long-Term U.S. Corporate Bonds Total Return Index (LTCBTRI) to Long-Term U.S. Government Bonds Total Return Index (LTGBTRI):
clip_image003

More…


LGMR: Gold Ends 2010 with 11th Annual Gain Running vs. World's Top 10 Currencies

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 06:08 AM PST

London Gold Market Report from Adrian Ash BullionVault Fri 31 Dec., 07:45 EST Gold Ends 2010 with 11th Annual Gain Running vs. World's Top 10 Currencies THE PRICE OF GOLD ended 2010 with an AM London Gold Fix of $1410.25 per ounce on Friday, racking up its 11th consecutive annual gain vs. the world's major currencies. Bullion Vault's Global Gold Index – which measures the gold price in terms of the world's top 10 currencies, each weighted by the issuing economy's GDP – showed a rise of 29.9% for the year. Gold scored both a quarterly and annual gain vs. all GGI constituent currencies on New Year's Eve, rising 29.7% against the US Dollar and adding 39.2% vs. the Euro from the last day of 2009. In the Dollar price alone, the 26 bullion-market experts and traders surveyed a year ago by the London Bullion Market Association missed both the peak and average gold price of 2010 by 2.3% on average. The LBMA survey's forecast low in the gold price was more than 6% beneath this year'...


Read Ted Butler's Prophetic Letter Warning Of COMEX Silver Manipulation... In 1989

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 06:05 AM PST


After precious metals market manipulation finally came out of the tinfoil hat closet and was officially recognized in 2010, subsequently becoming mainstream, following various whistleblowing disclosures which led to a long overdue investigation by the DOJ, and CFTC commissioners such as Bart Chilton admitting that there is in fact open market manipulation in the silver futures market by large short position holders, nobody is more relieved than Ted Butler. As the attached letter written by Butler shows, the PM expert wrote with excruciating detail everything that would subsequently be proven true. A key excerpt from the letter: "the true sorrow in this whole affair is that, in addition to the unnecessary financial punishment, the producers and owners of Silver (including the U.S. government) have experienced over the last six years, there are tens of thousands of contracts held short by innocent and unsuspecting speculators who are in for a ruinous shock. Do not be surprised, when this manipulation is attacked, to see the price of Silver open $20 per ounce higher at that time. Since that would represent a $100,000 loss on each contract held short, the current $2,000 COMEX margin will provide scant protection against the inevitable massive bankruptcies for those shorts not holding real Silver." The kicker: the letter was written on April 25, 1989.

 

h/t Mike Krieger and Ed Steer


Happy New Year from PSW!

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 05:56 AM PST


Happy New Year from PSW!

Courtesy of Phil of Phil's Stock World

Happy New Year!

It’s going to be a slow trading day most likely. Europe has been trending down all morning (7am) with no one wanting to be bullish into early closes and it looks like we’re down about 1% over there for the day.  Over in Asia, the Nikkei was closed and had also finished the week with a 1% drop while the Hang Seng finished their half-day flat at 23,035, up 5% for the year while the Shanghai rallied 1.8% on no volume but it wasn’t enough to save them from closing the year out down almost 14% – kind of odd since the "China growth story" is the main driver for the US equity premise.  

The Shanghai gauge’s advance for a third day narrowed its decline for the year to 14 percent, the worst performer among the 14 biggest world benchmark indexes, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. It’s the biggest drop since 2008, when the global financial crisis crimped the nation’s exports. The index jumped 80 percent in 2009 as a 4 trillion-yuan stimulus package and record new lending helped the Asian economy recover.  Whether another 4Tn Yuan is waiting in the wings in 2011 remains to be seen.  “The previous declines were excessive and the market is performing a technical rebound,” said Wu Kan, a fund manager at Dazhong Insurance Co. which oversees $285 million. “It’s a short-term correction amid weak market sentiment.”

We won’t get into that because I don’t want to be negative today.  I’m not even going to say anything negative about Pimpco’s BS $92M fine for using their $1.2 Trillion Dollar fund to manipulate the Treasury markets because, like GE selling key US technology to China, which we discussed yesterday – no one seems to care so why should I?  China can buy our aviation technology to build planes that may eventually put BA’s 150,000 workers onto the unemployment lines but we can’t buy property in China as China Daily reports that the nation’s housing ministry will work together with the Ministry of Commerce and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange to monitor overseas capital inflows into the property market.  

Joel Kotkin makes a good point in Forbes today about what he calls "The Poverty of Ambition" in which he also suggests the need for Westerners to cheer up and try to recapture a little of that positive pride and spirit that once made our countries great. He mentions how non-Western nations are building cities with startling new architecture and bold infrastructure – something I had pointed out a few months ago when I was talking about Singapore’s exciting new skyline but the general reaction from my mainly American audience was "those buildings look stupid."  As Kotkin points out:

This lack of ambition plagues virtually every Western country. The ability to act has become shackled by a profound pessimism that according to a recent Gallup survey contrasts with the optimism found not only in rising states like China, India and Brazil, but also deeply impoverished places like Bangladesh.

We used to travel the World and bring back photos and knick-nacks that we found interesting in other cultures and we would emulate them and incorporate them into our own designs, advancing our own culture.  America became a great nation as a "melting pot" of talent from many nations where a can-do attitude was blended with a willingness to try new things.  Even as recently as the 1980s, American business schools studied Japanese methods to find out how they were being so successful and that led to major innovations in US manufacturing, like our "just in time" systems that drive efficiency.  How many people are now studying Chinese business practices or do you, like 99.99% of all Americans, just dismiss whatever China does as some sort of bad Commie thing that we could never learn from?  

What made us great was our willingness to embrace other cultures and to learn from them and exchange ideas and to adapt the things we learned into our own culture.  Now we simply go to other countries looking for which local store we can tear down to make room for a new KFC or Starbucks – kind of sad…  What happened to this world?

I will reflect more on this subject over the weekend as we look ahead to 2011.  As I mentioned in yesterday’s post we remained short on oil and short on the markets but the DIA weekly $116.75 puts were taken off the table at 10:28 in Chat when I said to Members: "DIA $116.75 puts hit $1.40 – DO NOT BE GREEDY!"  $1.40 was up .47 (50%) from Wednesday’s entry so a good catch there and we flipped the risk to a .25 stop on the TZA Jan $14 calls at $1.50 in the Morning Alert and those finished the day at $1.63 but we should, as with the DIA puts, do much better today as hopefully the US markets match the rest of the World and drop 1% to close out 2010.  

We also grabbed a TZA April spread with 700% upside potential if we get a 15% drop in the Russell by then (670), which is lower than we expect but it pays off very well at all the in-between stops as well so nice protection into the New Year to cover what hopefully will be a lot more bullish bets.  In that same comment I also laid out a good starting position for a DIA Mattress Play, the strategy for which you can read about under the article "The Stock Market Parachute."

Hey, just because we’re trying to be more optimistic doesn’t mean we need to be idiots about it, right?  Actually, here’s something funny – I just Googled "portfolio protection" to look for an image to put on the above paragraph and there is almost nothing under images and and very little in the web links either.  No wonder the VIX is down to 17.50 – we are a totally complacent society aren’t we?  I guess the problem is most people don’t want you to protect your portfolio – they want you to CHURN your portfolio to generate fees.  The only thing "THEY" want to protect is WEALTH – if you have WEALTH, then there are hundreds of links from people who are willing to take care of you – just don’t try to actually build it because one of the things that wealthy people are being protected from is YOU – trying to hone in on their action!  

So we are well-protected and we can enjoy our weekend and bid a fond farewell to 2010 and the greatest holiday shopping season EVER (thanks Barry):  

Will it be enough to make Q4 earnings pop in January?  Will we have inflation, deflation or both and, more importantly – will anyone care or will we all just keep partying like it’s 1999?  

I was dreamin’ when I wrote this
Forgive me if it goes astray
But when I woke up this mornin’
Coulda sworn it was judgment day
The sky was all purple, 
there were people runnin’ everywhere
Tryin’ to run from the destruction, 
U know I didn’t even care

I was dreamin’ when I wrote this
So sue me if I go to fast
But life is just a party, and parties weren’t meant to last
War is all around us, my mind says prepare to fight
So if I gotta die I’m gonna listen to my body tonight

Say two thousand zero zero party over,  oops out of time
Tonight we’re gonna party like it’s 1999 


Prince 1999

Delightully Insane | Myspace Video

Imagine from PlayingForChangeFoundation on Vimeo.

Wishing you a happy, healthy and prosperous 2011, 

- Phil

For a 20% discount to try Phil's Stock World, click here.


Goldman's 10 Questions (And Answers) For 2011

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:59 AM PST


It is only fitting that just minutes after we disclosed our skepticism about those who forecast future events in a centrally planned regime, either directly or rhetorically, we ran into Goldman's 10 questions for 2011: the firm to whom none other than Brian Sack is supposed to report. While everything else is mostly Koolaid, the only important thing according to Jan Hatzius, who minutes ago appeared on Tom Keene, is that he may still advise his underlying at the FRBNY Bill Dudley to press go on QE3. Full list below.

From Goldman's 10 Questions for 2011 (pdf)

  • We wish all our readers a happy, healthy, and prosperous 2011.  In the last US Economics Analyst of the year, we tackle what we believe are the 10 most important questions on the economic outlook for the next year.
  • For the first time in five years, our one-year-ahead forecast for real GDP growth is well above the published consensus.  The main reason is a slowdown in the pace of private sector deleveraging, which has become evident in a sharp improvement in the economic data despite the loss of growth support from fiscal policy and the inventory cycle.  The enactment of the fiscal compromise has also helped.
  • One sector that is unlikely to show much improvement yet is housing.  We expect prices to fall further and building activity to pick up only gradually.  We also expect little help, on net, from foreign trade, though the main reason for this is stronger growth in US demand.
    Contrary to consensus expectations, core inflation is unlikely to accelerate from current levels, which are the lowest in at least half a century.  Indeed, our central forecast is for a slight further slowdown in core inflation to just ½%.  Because of the huge amount of excess “slack” in the economy, tail risks remain tilted to deflation rather than inflation.
  • We now think that Fed officials will stop expanding their balance in June 2011, i.e. after the first $600 billion of “QE2.”  However, further purchases are possible if inflation falls further and/or the economy grows more slowly than we now expect.  In any case, we do not expect any funds rate hikes in 2011 (and for that matter in 2012).
  • Longer-term interest rates are likely to drift up modestly, but we do not share the widespread concern about a federal debt crisis.  The state and local crisis will linger, but we do not think it will be severe enough to derail the recovery.

In the last US Economics Analyst of the year, we tackle what we view as the 10 most important questions on the economic outlook for 2011:

1. Will we finally see a “real” economic recovery?

Yes.  For the first time in at least five years, our one-year-ahead GDP growth forecast is well above the published consensus, as shown in Exhibit 1.  It is also well above our estimate of the economy’s potential growth pace of 2¾%.

What has made us so much more optimistic?  Most importantly, a sharp improvement in the economic data.  As shown in Exhibit 2, “organic” GDP growth—that is, the change in real GDP excluding the effects of inventories and fiscal policy—is on track for about a 5% (annualized) pace in the fourth quarter of 2010.  This is the fastest organic growth pace since at least 2006.  It contrasts with the picture of a year ago, when real GDP grew sharply but essentially all of the growth was due to transitory factors.  We believe that
the main reason for the improvement is a slowdown in the pace of private sector deleveraging, via a decline in the private sector financial balance—the gap between the total income and total spending of households and businesses—from the exceptionally high levels reached at the end of the recession.

2. Will the housing market recover meaningfully?

No.  The housing market is the only major sector of the economy where the news over the past few months has failed to improve materially.  Indeed, it has gotten a bit worse, and we now expect house prices to fall another 5% during 2011.  The reason is the still-large excess supply, as we have only unwound about one-third of the pre-bubble increase in the homeowner vacancy rate so far (see Exhibit 3).

In contrast to prices, housing starts should rise in 2011, though not yet at a pace that we would label “meaningful.”  In the most overbuilt parts of the country, activity is so close to zero that further declines are almost mathematically impossible.  In markets without a large supply overhang, in contrast, building activity is likely to recover gradually alongside the labor market and the broader economy.
 
3. Will the trade deficit shrink substantially?

No.  In the next few months, the deficit is likely to narrow a bit further as inventory accumulation slows and the apparent seasonal adjustment distortions in the petroleum import data abate.  But over the year as a whole, a meaningful improvement is unlikely.  Exhibit 4 shows that strong domestic demand growth almost always widens the trade deficit.  The only exception in recent memory was the late 1980s, when the Fed’s real broad trade-weighted dollar index fell by nearly 30%.  While our foreign exchange strategists expect the dollar to depreciate against most major currencies, their forecast implies a trade-weighted drop of only about 5%, probably not enough to make a significant dent in the deficit when demand is strengthening.
 
4. Will the unemployment rate fall?

Yes.  We expect a decline to 9% by the end of 2011 and a further drop to 8¼% by the end of 2012.  As shown in Exhibit 5, the relationship between changes in real GDP and changes in the unemployment rate—known by economists as “Okun’s law”—remains as close as it ever was.  The chart suggests that growth in line with our forecast would almost certainly bring down the unemployment rate meaningfully, although the level will remain high for years.
 
5. Will inflation move back toward 2%?

No.  In contrast to both the Federal Reserve and the consensus of forecasters, we expect core inflation to stay well below 1%, and indeed see a small further drop to ½%.  The main reason is the still-large amount of slack in the economy.  For at least five decades, core inflation has never risen when the unemployment rate was above 8%, as shown in Exhibit 6.  That is obviously not a law of nature but nevertheless a neat illustration of the basic idea that the demand/supply balance matters for prices.  And it illustrates that the risks remain tilted toward deflation rather than higher inflation, although neither is our baseline forecast.

6. Will profit margins rise further?

Yes.  To be sure, margins are already quite high by historical standards.  Exhibit 7 shows that the ratio of after-tax economic profits to nominal GDP currently stands at 5.6%, somewhat above the historical average.  Eventually, a combination of higher labor costs, higher taxes, and slower top-line growth may well push margins back toward the historical norm.
 
In 2011, however, we expect profits to grow about 15%, more than three times as fast as nominal GDP, as top-line growth accelerates and the high level of unemployment keeps labor costs at bay.  The best macroeconomic predictor of changes in profit margins is the gap between price inflation and unit labor cost inflation.  As shown in Exhibit 8, this measure still points to an exceptionally favorable outlook for corporate profits.  Although the gap is set to shrink, we do not see it closing until well after 2011.
 
7. Will QE2 end on schedule, i.e., in June 2011 with total holdings of $600bn?

Yes.  Although Fed officials have promised to review the “QE2” purchase program regularly, an early end is unlikely barring a huge upside surprise in growth or inflation.  But what will happen after June?

Not too long ago, we thought that QE2 could total as much as $2 trillion.  But we have beaten a hasty retreat from this forecast.  If real GDP grows at a 3½%-4% pace in the first half of 2011, it is hard to see a sufficiently strong push from Chairman Bernanke and other senior FOMC members to overcome the opposition from several regional Fed bank presidents who never liked QE2 much in the first place.  Our forecast for 2011 looks quite similar to the Fed’s—in hindsight, overly optimistic—view in early 2010, when the committee was nowhere close to considering further monetary easing but instead discussed the timing of the eventual “exit.”

This does not mean that further QE is now out of the question.  If core inflation falls moderately further than we expect—say to 0% rather than ½%—Chairman Bernanke and others may press to keep buying after June to provide extra insurance against deflation.  At a minimum, this means the FOMC is unlikely to “close the door” to further QE next spring.

8. Will Fed officials start to “exit” from their current policy stance by raising the funds rate or shrinking their balance sheet?


No.  Once again, we are puzzled by the consensus among economic forecasters that rate hikes are right around the corner.  The most recent Blue Chip Financial Indicators survey provides a stark illustration.  Out of 40 institutions that supplied forecasts for the first quarter of 2012, only 9 predicted a federal funds rate of 0.2% or less, i.e. more than three-quarters thought that the funds rate would rise from the current level.

In our view, rate hikes by early 2012 are possible but quite unlikely.  This is partly because standard models suggest that the “warranted” funds rate will remain in negative territory for a much longer period.  As shown in Exhibit 9, our forward-looking version of the “Taylor rule” currently suggests that the first rate hike should not occur until the fourth quarter of 201

4.  Admittedly, this is too extreme as a prediction because it does not take into account the impact of unconventional monetary policy measures and/or the unusually loose stance of fiscal policy.  If we include these two factors (crudely) via our measure of the “overall macroeconomic policy stance,” the first rate hike is indicated in early 2013.  We readily admit that these types of calculations are far from precise, but the conclusion that it is difficult to justify hikes by early 2012 is fairly robust.

In any case, there are also more practical reasons to doubt that Fed officials will raise the funds rate (or sell assets) quite so soon.  There are several things that likely need to happen before the first rate hike.  First, Fed officials need to stop expanding their balance sheet.  Second, they need to stop reinvesting MBS paydowns in Treasury securities.  Third, they need to drop the “extended period” commitment from the FOMC statement.   Fourth, they may want to drain some of the excess reserves out of the banking system (although we do not believe that this is necessary).

Could all of these steps occur in time to allow for a rate hike in 2011 or early 2012?  Yes.  If inflationary pressure rose quickly, the financial markets would clamor for tighter policy, and Fed officials would of course move more quickly.  But this would require economic outcomes that we find quite unlikely.

9. Will the 10-year Treasury note yield end 2011 above the current level of 3.4%?

Yes.  We expect a moderate increase to 3¾% by the end of 2011 and 4¼% by the end of 2012.  The “Sudoku” model constructed by our rates strategy team suggests that the turn to above-trend growth in the United States coupled with continued strong momentum in the emerging world will outweigh the slight further decline in core inflation and translate into a gradual updrift in bond yields.  Partly based on the message from Sudoku, our strategists argued back in October that 10-year yields were bottoming.

But given the scale of the recent selloff we are not particularly bearish on bonds.  Although we forecast rising yields, the rise falls short of the forwards and therefore implies that investors would be a bit better off ex post investing in bonds rather than cash.

Why so tame an increase in rates?  Mainly because the inflation and credit fundamentals are likely to remain more benign than many market participants now think.  In particular, we do not expect a meaningful increase in concerns about a federal debt crisis.  The deficit is very large, and a credible plan for longer-term consolidation would be very beneficial for US economic performance.  But there is still a lot of room to maneuver for a government with the power to tax a $15 trillion economy whose debt service payments currently total just 1½% of GDP.

10. Will the state and local budget crisis derail the recovery?

No.  To be sure, the situation is unlikely to get better quickly.  State governments still need to cut spending and raise taxes to offset the loss of federal stimulus funds, and cities are likely to see their property tax base shrink in lagged response to the house price collapse—with property tax rates and other local fees likely to move up in many jurisdictions.  All told, state and local cutbacks are likely to shave around ½ percentage point from growth in the next year, a similar amount as in calendar 2010.
 
But there is also some good news.  Exhibit 10 shows that real state and local tax receipts are now rising at a solid pace.  If the economy recovers in 2011-2012 as we expect, this increase is likely to gather pace.  And while we cannot rule out a recurrence of high-profile budget crises in some cases, we do not expect them to cause a large tightening of broader US financial conditions or derail the economic recovery.

Jan Hatzius

AttachmentSize
GS 10 Qs for 2011.pdf441.96 KB


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Predictions for 2011

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:41 AM PST

It's once again time for the obligatory "predictions" for the upcoming year. With the world being a crazier and more chaotic place than ever, such an exercise is inherently masochistic. However, being a good sport, I'll peek into my own crystal ball and attempt to decipher my vision for the future.

In keeping with tradition, I must first review my predictions for 2010 (here's where the masochism comes into play). As I attempt to "explain" how and why the world did not unfold as I predicted one year ago, two themes come into play: in one respect, I simply overestimated the speed at which events would progress in 2010; while in the other, I grossly underestimated the human capacity for stupidity.

I expected civil unrest in the U.S. in 2010 (as did the U.S. government when it illegally deployed a unit of the U.S. Army on American soil) due to the widespread recognition that the "U.S. economic recovery" was nothing but a propaganda hoax. Instead, placid American sheep went through all of this year still acquiescing to the delusion that the U.S. economy is "growing".

Part of the reason I expected the non-existent U.S. "recovery" to be acknowledged is that I considered this the only way that the U.S. government would be able to justify throwing "more than $1 trillion" at the U.S. economy, in attempting to reanimate this corpse. I was wrong here. While the Obama regime threw $800 billion at the U.S. economy (in extending tax-cuts for fat cats), and Bernanke threw another $600 billion at the economy (via more "QE"), these two colossal frauds did so while managing to avoid admitting that all of their rhetoric about a "U.S. economic recovery" was nothing but shameless lies.

I also expected clear acknowledgment of a "decoupling" between the U.S. economy (and a few other, weak Western economies) and the rest of the world. Here I was wrong as well. With the American people not even willing to acknowledge their economic fantasy, it was obviously less likely that people across an ocean would see through the façade.

I was correct that Western governments would have to make their "choice" between the expediency of more debt and money-printing or attempting to restore fiscal and monetary sanity to their economies. And I was correct that most would choose "expediency" (and future bankruptcy) ahead of attempted restraint. Indeed, the only Western economies which made any attempts at "austerity" were those who had it forced on them through the artificial Euro "debt crisis".

Turning to the precious metals market, I was ahead of myself in predicting gold prices: looking for $1500/oz by the spring of this year, and somewhere around $1800 by year end. With respect to silver however, my crystal ball was functioning much more effectively – where I stated that I "would not be surprised to see silver break $30/oz next year – if only briefly".

On that high note, let me turn now to 2011. I'll begin with a vow that is sure to disappoint many precious metals enthusiasts who read my work: I will not engage in any general predictions for gold and silver prices going forward – and likely never again. The reason? As is obvious, these markets are now so close to imploding/exploding that any attempt at "predicting" prices in the future is nothing more than facile guess-work.

Before disgruntled readers brand me a "cop out", let me attempt to justify that stand. I see a minimum of three dynamics, each of which is highly probable to occur next year, and each of which would cause an eruption in precious metals markets on a scale where "predictions" are impossible and/or useless.


Dollar Fail?

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:19 AM PST

If the dollar stays below this line, it indicates to me a fail and my trade is to get longer hard assets. Share this:


The Last Angry Man’s Problem With IMF Gold Sales

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:14 AM PST

By The Mogambo Guru

Adrian Ash of BullionVault.com writes that "the International Monetary Fund said it has completed the gold bullion sales program begun in October 2009," and now 403 tonnes of gold have been sold.

I bring this up all the time because the whole thing pisses me off because we gave those IMF bastards the gold to provide gold-standard legitimacy for their stupid fiat currency, the Special Drawing Right (SDR). And yet here they are selling the gold we loaned them! Gaaahhh!

Mr. Ash is apparently not particularly interested in how I have such a low opinion of the IMF and its little empires of crooks and liars, probably because, at the root, they are just more corrupt bankers, and it is always bankers who are the source of all economic problems, as they are the ones who can create money out of thin air just by making an accounting notation.

Oddly enough, early in my career, I tried this "accounting notation" approach with my boss as a way to "fix" the problem of my poor work performance and dismal results, instead of firing me on the spot, which was her original plan.

The way I explained it was that my Brilliant Mogambo Plan (BMP) was inspired by the fact that We're Freaking Doomed (WFD) because the foul Federal Reserve is creating so much money. Thus inspired, I suggested that we likewise bring sales forward by creating them out of that selfsame thin air, we book the sales as a profit, thus showing that I am highly profitable, and not incompetent as implied in those lying Quarterly Employee Performance Evaluations.

When she asked, with this stupid look of confusion on her face, "Huh? What? How did you get into my office?" I allayed her natural suspicions by telling her that I figured that this would be offset by subsequent cancellations of those sales, along with our "paying" penalties for breaking the contracts, meaning that, in effect, we would deduct these additional phantom expenses from income to shelter real income from taxation, turning a loss into a profit, everybody's happy, and we would both get all kinds of terrific bonuses and awards and promotions, and make a lot more money, too!

I remember leaning in towards her and whispering, "All it would take is for the accounting department to 'play ball' with us to somehow create money out of thin air, and it is your job to get their compliance and complicity, like Wall Street lobbyists extort compliance from Congress!"

The rest of the story is too ugly to talk about, and suffice it to say that it did not turn out well for me, the moral of which seems to be that creating things out of thin air, like money or sales, is a Very Bad Idea (VBI).

I could tell by the look of puzzlement on Mr. Ash's face that he probably wonders what in the hell some stupid story, by some stupid guy, about some stupid tax fraud proposed a long time ago, and that probably never happened at all, has to do with gold, or the IMF, or anything that anyone cares about.

Suddenly, I realized he was right! So I sat down and shut up, and was pretty embarrassed until he said, "Some 57% of the 403-tonne total was bought directly by central banks, led by India."

Inquisitive and suspicious, I wondered, "How much gold is that in terms of ounces?"  Quickly, my Agile Mogambo Mind (AMM) set to the task of multiplying 32,150 ounces per tonne times 403 tonnes, only to realize I have no idea what I am doing, and sure to be wrong, as I have been so, so wrong so, so many times about so, so many things, including, and especially, math, ranking, as it does, second on the list of Things That Confuse The Mogambo (TTCTM), losing the top spot to, "What women want and why they just don't shut up when I tell them to shut up about my not knowing what they want like I am some kind of stupid mind-reader or something."

That is why I am happy to report that, thanks to some help, we know that 32,150 ounces times 403 tonnes is just under 13 million ounces, which actually ain't much at $1,400 an ounce, amounting to a lousy $18 billion, which is so little money in an age when the word "trillion" and "trillions" appears so many times in the literature, including that magazine reader who wrote in to say that he liked the beautiful Miss February so much that he could stare at her for a trillion years and never get tired of it.

The point is not that I am rambling and apparently have forgotten to take my pills this morning, but that central banks, Junior Mogambo Rangers (JMRs) and everybody else is buying gold, gold, gold, which should indicate to you that you should, too.

And if you don't, you will learn that life can be hard, instead of easy, and which is so easy to achieve because merely buying gold and silver is enough, making it so, so easy that you giggle as you say, "Whee! This investing stuff is easy!"

The Mogambo Guru
for The Daily Reckoning

The Last Angry Man's Problem With IMF Gold Sales originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today's markets. Its been called "the most entertaining read of the day."


2011 America the Beautiful 5 Ounce Silver Coin Designs

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:14 AM PST

Since the 2010 America the Beautiful 5 ounce Silver Bullion Coins are now officially in the distribution channels for sale to the public, now is a good time to start thinking about the 5 ounce 2011-dated strikes of the series which include the investment-grade 2011 America the Beautiful Silver Bullion Coins and the numismatic or [...]


Featured Coin News and Articles for December 26, 2010 – January 1, 2011

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:14 AM PST

What's New This Week………

Greg Reynolds gives the ten leading topics of 2010. "This is my last column of the year 2010. It seems appropriate to list the ten leading topics of the year, starting with number ten."

Steve Roach asks, "are rare coins investments?" in his blog. "Are rare coins an investment class? They are according to the Wall Street Journal."

PMG will begin use of a new generation holder on January 3, 2011. All notes encapsulated after that date by PMG will automatically be placed in the new holder. Additionally, the new holder will be used for on-site grading during the Florida United Numismatists (FUN) convention in January.

Laura Sperber gives her opinions and predictions on the 2011 year for coins. "Consolidation in reverse! I expected a few firms to fold and smaller dealers to shut. Out of the blue comes the mega merger of Stacks and Bowers and Merena."

Vic Bozarth gives advice on how to build a meaningful set of U.S. coins. "During the holiday season I often reflect on the many blessings I have in my life. One of those blessings is the joy I receive from handling and looking at rare coins. In fact, I love my job. I get to look at coins virtually every day as a coin dealer."

Doug Winter writes on the proof-only double eagles dated 1883, 1884 and 1887. "Continuing my fascination with Proof-only issues, I'd like to discuss the rare Proof-only double eagles dated 1883, 1884 and 1887."

Heritage Auctions has announced that we will be auctioning The Dr. Norman Jacobs Collection of Korean and Japanese Coins, the most important collection of its kind, from one of the most famous Asian numismatic experts to have lived. This collection will be featured in our September 2011 Long Beach Signature Auction.

NEW & UPDATED – Our coverage of rare coin and currency news has expanded with Austin Purvis taking over as Editor of Coin News Daily. This is a special section of CoinLink where we scour the web for items of interest related to numismatics and post a short excerpt and link to these "off site" resources.

We have also made changes to The Bullion Report with daily news and article updates, and a monthly analysis of the "Premiums Over Spot" for Gold and Silver Bullion products.

View all the latest rare coin news here



Gene Arensberg: New lows for gold-silver ratio

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:14 AM PST

11:30a ET Friday, December 31, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold (and Silver):

The Got Gold Report's Gene Arensberg today notes that the gold-silver ratio has reached an extremely low level amid circumstances suggesting that it could go even lower as silver outperforms gold. Arensberg's commentary is headlined "New Lows for Gold-Silver Ratio" and you can find it at the Got Gold Report here:

http://www.gotgoldreport.com/2010/12/new-lows-for-gold-silver-ratio.html

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16


Precious metals will accelerate in 2011, Turk tells King World News

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:14 AM PST

11:20a ET Friday, December 31, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold (and Silver):

Interviewed by King World News, GoldMoney founder and gold and silver market analyst James Turk offers his predictions for the precious metals in 2011. Turk expects an acceleration of their rise. The interview is 17 minutes long and you can find it at King World News here:

http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/12/30_…

Or try this abbreviated link:

http://tinyurl.com/249xhb4

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

Help keep GATA going:

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16


Venezuela devalues for second time this year

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:13 AM PST

By Jose Orozco and Corina Rodriguez Pons
Bloomberg News
Thursday, December 30, 2010

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-30/venezuela-devalues-bolivar-by-s…

CARACAS, Venezuela — Venezuela devalued its currency for the second time since January, enabling the government to increase revenue at the risk of pushing up the world's highest inflation rate.

The government will weaken the exchange rate on so-called essential goods such as food and medicine by 40 percent to 4.3 bolivars per dollar on Jan. 1, unifying its two fixed foreign exchange rates in bid to pull the economy out of recession, Finance Minister Jorge Giordani said today on state television. Imports of essential goods were previously bought at a rate of 2.6 bolivars per dollar.

The devaluation will help narrow the government's budget deficit by bolstering the bolivar-based value of the state oil company's exports, said Orlando Ochoa, an economics professor at Andres Bello Catholic University in Caracas. Inflation, which is already the highest among 78 countries tracked by Bloomberg at 27 percent, may quicken further as food prices climb, he said.

"Devaluing has fiscal benefits but also hurts the country's economic activity," Ochoa said. "Clearly, this adjustment in the preferential exchange rate directly affects inflation for 2011."

The central government posted a deficit of 58.2 billion bolivars, or $13.5 billion at the new exchange rate, between January and November, according to a National treasury report.

Giordani, who has also served as planning minister under President Hugo Chavez, said the devaluation will help spur economic growth after two years of recession. Ochoa said that a pickup in inflation will "deepen the recession."

Chavez devalued the bolivar in January for the first time since 2005 and created a multi-tiered exchange system in an attempt to spur non-oil exports and curb the consumption of luxury imports at subsidized exchange rates. Venezuela is the largest oil producer in South America.

The devaluation will boost the tax revenue that state oil company Petroleos de Venezuela SA turns over to the government because the company had been selling some of its dollar revenue at the 2.6 exchange rate, said Milton Guzman, an economist at Caracas-based consulting company Fortuny, Guzman & Asociados. Oil accounts for about 95 percent of Venezuela's exports, according to the central bank.

About $18 billion of this year's $30 billion of imports were also purchased at the 2.6 per dollar rate, said Juan Socias, director of Caracas-based Grupo Soluciones, a research company that studies Venezuela's foreign exchange commission.

"With so many exchange rates in play there has been a lot of distortions" in the economy, said Guzman. "Now by selling everything at 4.3, PDVSA and the government's fiscal contributions will improve. That will translate into a greater flow of bolivars for the government."

Venezuela's oil-dependent economy contracted in 2010 for a second consecutive year as foreign currency shortages grew and crude production dropped, the central bank said in a report published on its website today. Venezuela's is the only major Latin American economy in recession.

The economy has suffered as a Chavez-led nationalization drive scared away private investment, Guzman said.

Gross domestic product shrank 1.9 percent this year, with the oil industry shrinking 2.2 percent and the non-oil sector contracting 1.8 percent, according to today's report, which cited preliminary figures. The economy contracted 3.3 percent in 2009.

Chavez ordered a crackdown on brokerages this year and the dismantling of an unregulated currency market they administered, which was used by Venezuelans to obtain dollars when they couldn't get permission from the government to buy at the official exchange rates.

Sitme, the exchange that replaced the unregulated or so-called parallel market, has traded $5.04 billion to date, an average of $36 million per day. The parallel market traded between $80 million and $100 million a day, Alberto Ramos, a Latin America economist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in New York said in June.

The devaluation, which investors had anticipated, will provide only temporary help for the budget, said Jaime Valdivia, head of emerging market research at Bluecrest Capital Management in New York.

"This will be a temporary measure that will alleviate some of the fiscal pressures but I don't think this changes the fundamental story of Venezuela, which is one of very high inflation, high deficits, and increasing debt problems," Valdivia said. "This doesn't really change that much."

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16


2011: Housing, Jobs, Stocks, Commodities, and Dollar

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 04:06 AM PST

As the global economy shows continued signs of a sustainable economic recovery, there are two notable areas lagging behind; employment and housing in the United States. Continued trends in these areas could lead to renewed weakness in ... Read More...



Let’s pray the dollar crashes quick so these jackasses’ destructive opinions and wars are taken offline

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 03:40 AM PST

Only 21 Percent Of U.S. Voters Support Net Neutrality HERE’S A GOOD EXAMPLE; AN ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE, A COMPLETE DOUCHE BAG, HAS NO IDEA WHAT’S IN THE CONSTITUTION. WHAT’S THE POINT OF PRETENDING THAT U.S. GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES ARE NOT ALL JUST COMPLETE ASSHOLES. WE HAVE BEEN ABANDONED. THE REST OF THE WORLD IS MOVING AHEAD WITHOUT [...]


“The time to protect yourself from the oncoming hyperinflation is narrowing, and for many reasons I believe physical silver is the pre-eminent method of doing so.”

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 03:21 AM PST

Andrew Hoffman All, As we close 2010, silver is trading at a new 30-year high of $30.75/oz, with the REAL (non-paper) price closer to $36.00/oz from coin and bullion dealers. Given all the issues I have written about all these years, many of which I expect to reach the consciousness of the masses in 2011, [...]


FX Wi(n)dow Dressing?

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 03:18 AM PST


On a day that was supposed to be as quiet as they get, the now traditional spike in FX vol that we have been observing for the past two months (even as the VIX has plunged to year lows) is back like clockwork. As the chart below shows, the EURUSD is now well over 100 pips higher on the day, and is back to early December levels. The reason, according to some, is that the various global banks, mostly French and US, who have been buying the billions in EURs sold by assorted central banking cartels in the past few months, starting with the BIS and going down, are engaged in some good old fashioned window dressing. There was a time when window dressing applied to stocks. With that now completely priced in, it is time to move on to FX, and shortly thereafter, gold. And speaking of the latter, with the yellow metal at $1,417, and just dollars away from the all time high, it would not be too surprising to see the best performing asset class tracked by Reuters to close the year at an all time high.


Gold Ends the Year in a Bullish Fashion - What's Next?

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 02:51 AM PST

It's instructive to look at the end of the year financial magazines and see their analysis of the past year and their projections for the future. For example, the special issue of Fortune Magazine Investor's Guide 2011 had a glimmering stack ... Read More...



The Morning Gold Report

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 02:48 AM PST

Gold Posts Tenth Consecutive Annual Gain

The final London gold fix for 2010 came in at $1410.25, confirming the tenth consecutive y/y gain for the yellow metal. Gold appreciated in value by 27.74% in 2010. Since the 29-Dec-2000 fix at 272.65, gold is up 417.24%. Today's silver fix was $30.63, a staggering 80.28% annual gain. With the DJIA poised to notch about a 10% gain for the year, I find myself once again unconcerned that gold and silver pay no dividends and have no yield.

The euro firmed today on year-end flows in thin market conditions, which weighed on the dollar. The dollar index tumbled back to the 79.00 area, threatening the 50-day moving average and suggesting that the mid-Dec low at 78.82 is in jeopardy. Just below the latter, the halfway back point of the entire rally from 75.63 to 81.44 comes into play at 78.53. If this level gives way as well, considerable credence will be returned to the long-term downtrend in the dollar. That would bode well for gold.

Egon von Greyerz of Matterhorn Asset Management made a pretty bold assertion in his last commentary for 2010: Hyperinflation will drive gold to unthinkable heights. EvG is particularly concerned about the US and UK in 2011, going on to explain, "We now live in a world where governments print worthless pieces of paper to buy other worthless pieces of paper that combined with worthless derivatives, finance assets whose values are totally dependent on all these worthless debt instruments. Thus most of these assets are also worth-less." That's essentially the same assessment that I made in Monday's report.

Mr. von Greyerz's commentary is supported by a number of rather disturbing charts and you can find it here. Props to Tyler Durden of ZeroHedge for calling the Matterhorn analysis to my attention.

As a metals broker, I find myself reveling once again in the annual performance of the assets I sell for a living. However, I simultaneously remain very troubled over the reasons for that performance. If you take the time to read the von Greyerz commentary, try not to let it dampen this evening's festivities. Know, that as a gold and/or silver owner, you are taking necessary and prudent steps to protect yourself and your family from the calamity unfolding around us.

On behalf of everyone here at USAGOLD – Centennial Precious Metals, I wish you all a happy and prosperous new year.


How to bring down the System

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 02:47 AM PST




There are a lot of angry people out there. I see it every day in my writing. All you have to do is look at the comments at a site like Zero Hedge to realize that fact. To some extent you saw this in the last election. Those who vote (less than half the population) sent a message and as a result there has been a significant change in the political landscape.

But what do the voters get for sending the message? A slap in the face. A few weeks later we get a monster tax break for high end earners, a roll over of the tax treatment for hedge fund mangers (just obscene), another $120 billion “stimulus” that won’t do a damn thing but add to the debt and an extension of unemployment payment for yet another year (now three years!)

If you pay bills (who doesn’t) you know that all banks, credit card companies, utilities, insurance companies and all the others are just nickel and diming us to death. Every month I am nicked for some damn thing or the other. I think the FinReg rules that were supposed to protect the average Jane or Joe actually just codified what the bastards could charge. As a result we get hit with new fees, charges and higher costs.

The very frustrating part of all this is that there is not a thing you can do about it. Go write you congressperson, you’re lucky to get a form response. Get on the phone to your CC provider and bitch over a $25 late charge on a $15 balance? Good luck.

I have been doing something for the past few months that might send a message. If I continued for the next hundred years it would not make a dent. If a hundred thousand did as I am doing it would be noticed but still wouldn’t mean a thing. But if the number got into the millions it would start to make a difference.

I have been sending 1 cent more than what is due on every bill that I get. Citi sends a CC balance of $134.82? I send them $134.83.

I have a small sample of about 30 bills that I have been doing this with. Well more than half get it right. On the next month CC bill you get the Prior Balance as (-0.01). What this means is that a real person actually got the bill and the check (or electronic payment) and made the correct entry and gives you the once cent credit you deserve. This result should not be surprising as people make incorrect payment amounts all the time. What I am trying to do is force more human intervention. That is time and money.

I paid a six-month insurance bill and added a penny to what was owed. So far I have two letters that show the credit. How much does two computer generated letters cost? At least a dollar a pop. There is no better measure of success of my approach than to get a letter like this.

More exciting are the bills that do not pick up the one-cent variance. When this happens your penny is lost. It will show up in an Exception Report. Some computer recognizes that there is a penny that is not properly accounted for. I assume that this happens (accidentally) thousands of times a day. But what would happen if the number of Exceptions all of sudden exploded to 20-50 million a month? Once again, this would force humans to get involved.

The cost of this social protest is very minimal. Say you get 4 bills a month. 48 pennies a year is the maximum cost. Based on my experience the net cost would only be 20 cents or so. But the rewards on the 20 cents just keep on giving. Every month after you can see the results. Either they do it right or wrong. Either way there is an incremental cost. Your penny is gumming up the system.

What if 10mm people did this on a regular basis? That would be a half billion one-penny exceptions a year. If just one in ten resulted in an “exception” it would mean that there would be an incremental cost someplace of at least $50 million. In my dream world 25mm people would do this and get just two letters a year as a result. Cost of that? Who knows? It would imply 1.2 billion exceptions a year. That would be noticed. (It would blow their collective minds if this started to happen)

So if you’re mad at the system and want some revenge send an extra penny to your friends at the gas-company, electric company, insurer, bank, CC company, etc. I highly recommend it. The cost is negligible. Yes, it is true that this form of protest will accomplish very little unless it catches on like a fad. But should you get (as have I) some evidence that your lousy penny is in fact causing someone someplace to spend time and money trying to figure it all out you will beam with happiness at your success. I am.


Will Silver Be Worth More Than Gold? Perspectives On A Coming Silver Shortage

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 02:35 AM PST


While hardly news to regular readers, most of whom have ridden the 80%+ wave in silver in 2010, the following video from Future Money Trends explains some of the key basics about why silver, which is unique in the precious metals basket in that it is also an industrial metal (and has thus sparked much debate over whether or not it, like gold, is "money"), and provides some perspectives on why silver just may one day be more valuable than gold. Some facts: while there are 10 ounces of silver, for every ounce of gold mined, the most of it is not "free flowing" and is locked up in industrial uses; for every $1 in SLV investors still pile $7 in GLD; above ground silver has declined from 10 billion ounces in 1950 to 5-700 million ounces in 2010 (compared to an increase in above ground gold from 1 billion to 7 billion ounces); the gold to silver ratio is at 50x while the average long-term is 15x, industrial demand for silver is up 18% in 2010; and much more. Of course, there is no reason why one has to pick one or the other. Historically both have been tiered stores of value, with the Roman empire going so far as to succumb its silver currency when the going got tough. The simple fact is since global deleveraging will likely continue and since the US government will need to print trillions, most of it monetized by the Fed, the ongoing currency dilution will continue to result in increasing P prices: pretty simple. The only downside case to gold and silver holdings would involve massive asset liquidations a la September 2008, which also would mean that the Fed has lost control, that the US dollar is no longer the reserve currency, and that after the smoke settles, non-fiat currencies will rise again. And that includes both gold and silver.

 

h/t Daniel


THe eND iS iN SiGHT (HaPPY 2011)

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 02:22 AM PST


FR

CL

Weekend

 

AA

 

Rec

 

D

 

Silver

 

R2

 

QJ

 

SAR

 

EN

 

PL

 

HN

 

BW

 

 

 

 

 


Happy New Year Everyone (Felice Anno Nuovo A Tutti)

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 02:20 AM PST

And here's to an even better year in 2011 for gold and silver - ENJOY:



Gold Ends the Year in a Bullish Fashion – What’s Next?

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 02:06 AM PST

Summing up, the situation for gold has moved from a slightly bearish sentiment to a bullish outlook for the near and medium term. Silver appears likely to take out previous highs and further increases are likely based on current signals. At this time, it seems best for investors to stay with current holdings and - again - perhaps open small speculative long positions.


Gold Ends 2010 in a Bullish Fashion – What’s Next?

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 01:51 AM PST

It's instructive to look at the end of the year financial magazines and see their analysis of the past year and their projections for the future. For example, the special issue of Fortune Magazine Investor's Guide 2011 had a glimmering stack of gold coins on the cover with a headline “Gold Gone Wild.”


Silver Mining Stocks Are for Suckers

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 01:41 AM PST

Matt Badiali writes: Mining is for suckers. I've told you this before... and you may think that as the editor of a resource and mining advisory, I've lost my mind saying so. After all, I've recommended plenty of mining companies, and most of my readers love the idea of owning them.


New Year's Eve Poll: What Issue Will Dominate (Actionable) News Flow In 2011?

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 01:40 AM PST


Ongoing Fed Market Interventions / Monetary Policy
9% (83 votes)
Washington Gridlock / Fiscal Policy
5% (49 votes)
European Insolvency
17% (158 votes)
China Hard Landing
5% (45 votes)
State/Municipal Insolvency
25% (235 votes)
Broken Stock Markets
2% (16 votes)
Surging FX/Rates Volatility
2% (17 votes)
(Hyper)inflation
4% (39 votes)
(Hyper)deflation
1% (9 votes)
(Hyper)stagflation
2% (15 votes)
Geopolitical Tensions
4% (42 votes)
Fat Tails Insurance
0% (3 votes)
Commodity Price Surge (Gold, Silver, Oil, Palladium, etc)
14% (132 votes)
Currency/Trade Warfare
3% (32 votes)
New Bubbles - Rubber, Rice, Rare Earths, etc.
3% (24 votes)
Other
5% (49 votes)
Total votes: 948


Is Gold Or Fiat Currency In a Bubble

Posted: 31 Dec 2010 01:36 AM PST

It is easy to argue that gold is in a bubble. But as I pointed out last month: Deutsche Bank's head commodities researcher [Michael Lewis] wrote in September:


No comments:

Post a Comment