A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Gold World News Flash

Gold World News Flash


Fannie Screws The Citizens Twice

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

Market Ticker - Karl Denninger View original article June 23, 2010 12:08 PM First, Fannie Mae ran crooked books for years, got caught, ran insane risk models for years more (80:1 leverage anyone?), got caught again, the second time by the market and essentially forced the government to step in lest they default on over $3 trillion in paper sold to, in large part, the Chinese. Now, having screwed you, the taxpayer, through outright fraud and ridiculous risk-taking and being a prime architect of the housing bubble, they now propose to bend you over again: (Strike-outs original, italics mine.) [INDENT]WASHINGTON, DC — Fannie Mae (FNM/NYSE) announced today policy changes designed to encourage borrowers to work with their servicers and pursue alternatives to foreclosure designed to assrape anyone who does what banks and other commercial entities do every day - intentionally default when it suits them. Defaulting borrowers who walk-away and had the capacity to pay or did not com...


Too Many Advertisements for Gold?

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT The latest and most flaccid argument against Gold is the idea that the increase in advertisements for buying and selling Gold are an indication of a crowded market or public involvement. As I explained in an editorial last year, sentiment follows the trend most of the time. As a bull market matures, more and more people come onboard. Sentiment has to be bullish for a bull market to persist and this is most true in the later stages when the crowd arrives. One of the reasons the gold bull market has far more time and room to run is that people have bubble fatigue. With numerous bubbles blowing up in the last ten years, Wall St and the public are quick to declare anything a bubble despite their inability to understand and analyze sentiment. Hence, we hear asinine concerns about too many advertisements. Tell me; are bonds in a bubble only because Pimco is advertised around the clock on CNBC? Unlike these armchair analysts, we use a handful...


Suiting Up for a Post-Dollar World

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Arial][COLOR=#000000]John Browne - Senior Market Strategist, Euro Pacific Capital. [/COLOR][/COLOR][/FONT] The global financial crisis is playing out like a slow-moving, highly predicable stage play. In the current scene, Western governments are caught between the demands of entitled welfare beneficiaries and the anxiety of bondholders who fear they will be stuck with the bill. As the crisis reaches an apex, prime ministers and presidents are forced into a Sophie's choice between social unrest and bankruptcy. But with the "Club Med" economies set to fall like dominoes, the US Treasury market is not yet acting the role we would have anticipated. Our argument has always been that the US benefits from its reserve-currency status, allowing it to accumulate unsustainable debts for an unusually long period without the immediate repercussions of inflation or higher borrowing costs. But this false sense of security m...


Daily Dispatch: The Lay of the Land

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

June 25, 2010 | www.CaseyResearch.com The Lay of the Land Dear Reader, I would like to kick off today’s missive by congratulating the House and Senate on reaching an agreement on the massive new financial regulations bill that’s all but certain to be passed next week. The details of the bill are readily available on any number of websites so I won’t cover that ground. Notably, in much the same way the hastily assembled and ill-advised Patriot Act launched the behemoth Homeland Security, the financial reform bill creates a massive new consumer protection agency with an annual budget of $850,000,000. Laughably, this new agency will be operated by the Fed, and its mandate will be “Protecting America’s Consumers.” But wait, isn’t that the job of the… The existing agency, it must be pointed out, runs a budget of over $250 million. Then there’s the billion dollars ...


Gold: A Bubble on the Verge of Bursting?

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

courtesy of DailyFX.com June 25, 2010 03:00 PM Gold has marched steadily higher over the past ten years, with only the reasons behind investors’ demand for the yellow metal changing along the way. Looking ahead however, mounting fundamental and technical evidence suggests that a sharp downturn lies around the corner. GOLD 6-MONTH FUNDAMENTAL FORECAST Real Gold Supply, Demand Pressure Prices Lower The trends in real demand look decidedly lackluster, with gold for the manufacture of jewelry as well for industrial and dental use clearly tracking lower (the former for over a decade and the latter for at least three years). Meanwhile, supply seems to be picking up. Indeed, mine production has snapped a multi-year downtrend with output rising for the first time in close to seven years. Further, gold scrap such as jewelry melted down for its metal content is on the rise as well. Reasonably enough, if real factors were the only forces driving the market, falling demand and ri...


Fed Credit, Inflation and the Idiots in the Middle

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

A whole series of alarms occurred after I got the news, although I lost the source, that "food stamp usage just soared to a new record high" of 40.2 million persons. This number is alarming in itself because it means that the economy is so bad that more and more hungry people cannot afford to even feed themselves, sort of like teenagers, but with hopefully better manners and dietary choices. And also alarming that the number of people needing government assistance to buy food "soared," which is probably a verb of some kind, which indicates action, which is a signal to me, a real Mogambo Action Hero (MAH) kind of guy, to spring into action with my awesome superhuman power to instantly perceive trends in even random data. Ergo, it made me shriek alarmingly "We're freaking doomed!" which alarmed the other diners in the restaurant. In terms of households, "18.5 million households receive benefits" which means little to me other than the fact that these needy people live in households o...


How to Legally (and Easily) Hold Gold Offshore

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud Wednesday, June 16, 2010 I got some terrible news yesterday… My friend Glen Kirsch died. I was surprised to hear it… Just three weeks ago, Glen and I were chatting about gold and how to hold it offshore. I wanted his ideas, and I wanted the specifics. Glen, as always, delivered. Glen and his business partner Michael Checkan have been reliable contacts for me in the gold world since I started writing investment newsletters in the 1990s. They run a firm called Asset Strategies International and have helped pioneer a few interesting products, including one called the Perth Mint Certificate Program. I've known about Perth Mint Certificates for many years… I know they're a simple, safe way to hold gold. But I never actually thought of these certificates as legally owning gold outside the U.S. However, that's exactly what they are… and that makes them extremely interesting now. You see, the government really wants to ...


Jon Hykawy: REEs Explained

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

Source: Brian Sylvester of The Gold Report 06/25/2010 Rare earth elements (REEs) are not all that rare. They are virtually everywhere—even in economic concentrations in safe jurisdictions, says Byron Capital Analyst Jon Hykawy. What's more, the prices for some high-demand metals derived from REE deposits continue to reach new heights, almost daily. These metals are essential to the manufacture of magnets used in hybrid and electric cars and other high-end "green" technology—a thriving market indeed. If that seems like a recipe for investment success, read what Jon has to say about the REE market in this exclusive interview with The Gold Report. It's complicated. Not one REE deposit to date comes without significant baggage. But there's still money to be made if you're willing to settle for a long-term relationship. The Gold Report: You cover the clean technology and alternative energy sector, which depends on constant supplies of rare earth elements or RE...


Richard Karn: PM Rudd's Death Warrant—RSPT

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

Source: Richard Karn and The Gold Report 06/25/2010 Is the Rudd removal a brilliant political ploy on the part of the Labour Party? Pushing back the September/October federal election they likely would've lost to April 2011 provides them ample time for damage control. But what about the significant, unintended consequence of the RSPT? In this Gold Report exclusive, Richard reveals "the market door has slammed on companies out until the matter is resolved." I was in Sydney yesterday arranging a mine site visit when the announcement was made that Julia Gillard would replace Kevin Rudd as the leader of the Labour Party and Prime Minister of Australia. I used the opportunity of being in Sydney to catch up with Nick Garling at Morning Star Gold, who was memorably outspoken about the Resource Super Profits Tax (RSPT) amounting to Rudd's "death warrant," as well as a variety of other managing directors. Their take on events, which, from what I'm reading largely reflects t...


Jim?s Mailbox

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

View the original post at jsmineset.com... June 25, 2010 08:00 AM Gold, The Formula and Illusion of Recovery CIGA Eric I know much of the media and many individuals have filed the structural deficit under "Who Care’s" and moved on. It is, nevertheless, very important to confidence in and fate of the U.S. dollar. Total revenues collects by the US government continue to lag devaluation in the US dollar. In other words, "real" or gold adjusted total revenues continue to collapse at an alarming rate. Real or Gold Adjusted Federal Total Receipts 12-Month Moving Average (TR12MA) AND Federal Total Receipts 12-Month Moving Average Year-over-Year Change (TW12MA12LN): While Jim’s formula illustrates an anemic bounce, gold’s unabated rise during its uptick is best described as the middle finger gesture to economic recovery illusion. US Federal Budget (Surplus or Deficit As A % of GDP, 12 Month Moving Average) and Gold London P.M. Fixed: Source: fms.tr...


In The News Today

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

View the original post at jsmineset.com... June 25, 2010 08:09 AM Jim Sinclair’s Commentary 46 States and growing. There is more trouble in the United States than in the EU. The Formula has overrun the States. States of Crisis for 46 Governments Facing Greek-Style Deficits By Edward Robinson – Jun 25, 2010 Californians don't see much evidence that the worst economic contraction since the Great Depression is coming to an end. Unemployment was 12.4 percent in May, 2.7 percentage points higher than the national rate. Lawmakers gridlocked over how to close a $19 billion budget gap are weighing the termination of the main welfare program for 1.3 million poor families or borrowing more than $9 billion in the bond market. California, tied with Illinois for the lowest credit rating of any state, is diverting a rising portion of tax revenue to service debt, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its August issue. Far from rebounding, the Golden State, with a $1.8 tr...


Hourly Action In Gold From Trader Dan

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

View the original post at jsmineset.com... June 25, 2010 10:29 AM Dear CIGAs, I mentioned in one of my earlier posts this week that bulls would need a Herculean effort to blunt the effects of Monday's big downside reversal day. Guess what – they got exactly that! In one of the more remarkable displays of gritty determination and tenacity that the gold market has seen since it first began its decade long bull market, the longs have completely negated the bearish downside reversal day pattern that emerged on the charts after Monday's significant sell off from a new record high price. This simply does not happen very often, in any market for that matter, and has never occurred in gold since 2001. If you are a short, you have to be reeling in stunned disbelief. There are serious buyers at work in gold. This performance is not merely impressive (that is too mild of a word), it is stupendously rare! Again, at the risk of beating a dead horse, the technical action in gold is telling us...


Banks "Dodged A Bullet"?

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

Market Ticker - Karl Denninger View original article June 25, 2010 08:08 AM Hmmm..... [INDENT]June 25 (Bloomberg) -- Legislation to overhaul financial regulation will help curb risk-taking and boost capital buffers. What it won't do is fundamentally reshape Wall Street's biggest banks or prevent another crisis, analysts said. [/INDENT]Probably. The ink is not yet dry and there's no vote yet on exactly what this bill actually is and does.  I'll be doing my usual analysis once I have an actual stable copy. But what I can tell from watching CSPAN until the wee hours, and following the process as closely as I reasonably can without crawling up Barney Frank's skirt, this is what we got: [LIST] [*]Banks will have to spin off SOME (but not the important parts) of their derivative operations.  The parts they care about (and on which they make the most money) are not credit-default swaps, they're interest-rate and FX swaps.  Those are pretty much left alone, and that s...


A Strange Options Expiry

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

For an options expiry day, it was about as different as they come. Gold set a double bottom just under $1,230 spot... with the absolute bottom coming at the Comex open at $1,227.50 spot. From that point, gold took off... hitting it's spike-high price of $1,249.60 spot about 11:15 a.m. Eastern time... 15 minutes after the London close. That was all the excitement for the day, as gold got sold off quietly going into the close. But, if you examine the chart below, you'll see that the rally did not go unopposed... as an obvious not-for-profit seller showed up three times during gold's rally... just to prevent the rally from gaining as much momentum as it was obviously capable of. 'Da boyz' were certainly after silver yesterday. The selling pressure began the moment that trading opened in London yesterday morning... with the absolute low [$18.18 spot] coming around 8:32 a.m. in New York. As Ted Butler said on the phone yesterday... they weren't even ...


US Double Dip Depression... Greece Sells Islands?

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

US Double Dip Depression Friday, June 25, 2010 – by Staff Report Ben Bernanke Ben Bernanke (left) needs fresh monetary blitz as US recovery falters ... Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke is waging an epochal battle behind the scenes for control of US monetary policy, struggling to overcome resistance from regional Fed hawks for further possible stimulus to prevent a deflationary spiral. ... Fed watchers say Mr. Bernanke and his close allies at the Board in Washington are worried by signs that the US recovery is running out of steam. The ECRI leading indicator published by the Economic Cycle Research Institute has collapsed to a 45-week low of -5.7 in the most precipitous slide for half a century. Such a reading typically portends contraction within three months or so. Key members of the five-man Board are quietly mulling a fresh burst of asset purchases, if necessary by pushing the Fed's balance sheet from $2.4 trillion (£1.6 trillion) to unchart...


BP's Eventual Bankruptcy Certain

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

By James West MidasLetter.com Friday, June 25, 2010 There is no doubt that BP will not emerge from this oil spill disaster intact. Make no mistake – this is the fatal black swan event in BP's life that is going to take investors by the hundreds down with the ship. Its not going to happen immediately. Much like the slow initial fall and eventual breakneck pace of collapse of a giant tree, the giant oil leak is the event that will catalyze the fall of this far flung and storied company. Here's some food for thought in support of my prediction. I also caveat that statement with the possibility that a 'merger' or 'buyout' will be forced and negotiated out of public view to offset political carnage. Either way, shareholders and taxpayers alike will burn. What they're still touting as the 'worst environmental disaster in U.S. history' is quickly growing up into the worst environmental disaster in the history of humanity. With the unprecedented scale and scope of this ast...


Creso Exploration's IPO and Drilling Success

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

By Claire O'Connor and James West MidasLetter.com Friday, June 25, 2010 Fresh from the completion of their qualifying transaction and $4.6 million brokered financing on June 1st 2010, Creso Exploration Inc. (TSX.V: CXT), formerly Willowstar Capital Inc, is already making waves in mining friendly Ontario. The company's mineral rich Minto project, located half way between Timmins and Sudbury, is only 30 kilometers south-west of NorthGate Mineral Corp's (TSX.V: NXG) Young-Davidson gold deposit. The results from Creso's 2009 diamond drilling program are in, and they're good. Creso currently owns a very large land position of approximately 280 square kilometers in the Shining Tree Area of the Larder Mining Division in Ontario. Made up of a mix of wholly owned properties as well as claims with agreements to earn-in or to joint-venture, the Minto Pro...


LGMR: Gold Seen "Stable in Summer Lull" as Yuan's "Dead-Cert" Rise Questioned

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

London Gold Market Report from Adrian Ash BullionVault 07:50 ET, Fri 25 June Gold Seen "Stable in Summer Lull" as Yuan's "Dead-Cert" Rise Questioned THE PRICE OF WHOLESALE GOLD held onto Thursday's gains early in London on Friday, trading 0.8% below last week's record weekly finish as world stock markets slipped for the fourth day running. Commodities also held flat, as did silver prices, trading 2.6% down for the week at $18.71 per ounce. The US Dollar rose against the Pound, Yen and Euro – helping push the gold price in Euros back above €32,550 per kilo. But the Dollar was outpaced by the Chinese Yuan, meantime, which rose to a new record as the People's Bank set its daily fix 0.3% higher from Thursday. The PBoC announced its new "flexible" policy on Monday, a move widely seen as trying to deflect accusations of export-stealing at tomorrow's G20 summit of leading economies in Toronto. "Now that revaluation of the CNY has begun," says French ban...


AEP Chokes On His Neo-Fraudesian Beer

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

Market Ticker - Karl Denninger View original article June 25, 2010 06:19 AM There is nothing more amusing than watching the Neo-Fraudesian economists (that's what so-called "Keynesians" actually are) run into the wall of reality at 120 mph: [INDENT]Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke is waging an epochal battle behind the scenes for control of US monetary policy, struggling to overcome resistance from regional Fed hawks for further possible stimulus to prevent a deflationary spiral. [/INDENT]Really?  A "deflationary spiral"?  Is that really deflation in your pocket or is it withdrawal and mean-reversion of the outrageous hyperinflationary credit policies of the previous 20 years that is FORCED when the scam runs its course and can't find any more participants for the Ponzi Scheme? Ambrose continues: [INDENT]Key members of the five-man Board are quietly mulling a fresh burst of asset purchases, if necessary by pushing the Fed's balance sheet from $2.4 trillion (£1....


BI Research on Continental Minerals

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

The following is automatically syndicated from Grandich's blog. You can view the original post here June 25, 2010 03:54 AM Further to my comment earlier this week on Continental Minerals (KMK-TSX-V $1.97) – I was sent this commentary from BI Research and believe it has some very worthy observations on KMK. CONTINENTAL MINERALS* (KMKCF $1.96 OTC BB, +45%); BI Rank = 9.1 – Strong Buy (604) 684-6365 BC [url]www.hdgold.com[/url] (Recommended 3/04) Continental Minerals, which I believe remains a juicy takeover target, is located in Tibetan China and has proven up 220 million tons of measured and indicated reserves in its high grade-porphyry copper-gold Xietongmen deposit grading 0.43% copper and 3.9 grams of gold per ton. This translates into 2 billion pounds of copper and 4.3 million ounces of* gold. In addition, Continental's Newtongmen deposit, a couple thousand feet away and drilled off more recently, sports another 2.8 billion lbs. of copper and 2.3 million ounces of gold plu...


Crude Traders Abstain from a Drop in Sentiment as US Data Tops a Slow Day for Event R

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

courtesy of DailyFX.com June 24, 2010 03:22 PM With a downshift in fundamental activity between Wednesday and Thursday; we would see a similar shift in the quality of price action for the energy market. At the floor of its rising trend channel and a notable pivot level around $75.50, the benchmark NYMEX crude oil futures contract has found a technical boundary to discourage undue momentum from building without a clear picture of how both risk appetite and economic activity will develop through the near future. Yesterday, both underlying price drivers were in flux. North American Commodity Update Commodities - Energy Crude Traders Abstain from a Drop in Sentiment as US Data Tops a Slow Day for Event Risk Crude Oil (LS NYMEX) - $76.21 // -$0.14 // -0.18% With a downshift in fundamental activity between Wednesday and Thursday; we would see a similar shift in the quality of price action for the energy market. At the floor of its rising trend channel and a notable pivot level ar...


Crude Oil Volatility Holds Steady, as Stock Volatility Soars; Gold Tries to Regain it

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:16 PM PDT

courtesy of DailyFX.com June 24, 2010 07:05 PM Crude oil has so far held above the key $75.50 level, but sinking stocks pose a challenge to this formidable 'double support.' Traders should look toward classic trading strategies when approaching gold. Commodities - Energy Crude Oil Volatility Holds Steady, as Stock Volatility Soars Crude Oil (WTI) $76.70 +$0.19 +0.25% In the face of plunging stock markets, crude oil managed to eke out a gain in Thursday’s session. We have been alluding to crude oil’s relative strength, but the commodity’s performance on Thursday was particularly impressive. This divergence was also displayed in volatility; the VIX, which represents implied volatility in nearby S&P 500 index options, soared close to 10%, while the same measure of volatility in oil inched up a little over 2%. Crude oil is clearly reluctant to go down, but more steep losses in stocks will surely spill over into oil, and thus caution is warr...


Will We Have Inflation, Deflation, or Hyperinflation? Part 2

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 04:00 PM PDT


From The Daily Capitalist

This is Part 2 of a four part article that deals with what I feel is the primary question investors must now answer: is our future to be inflation or deflation? The answer has vast implications to our investment planning and decisions for the near term, and possibly for our long term. It is a very complex question with a lot of moving parts involving economics and politics.

 

Like it or not, it is economic theory that is driving macroeconomic policies and political decisions that determine whether we will have inflation or deflation. Since not all of my readers are sophisticated traders I have tried to present the issues in a direct and hopefully understandable way. To those sophisticated readers, please bear with me.

Part 2

The Inflation Argument

The argument for inflation rests on the money supply charts. The inflationists show various measures of money supply increasing, including the version used by Austrian theory economists, called True Money Supply (TMS)[1]:

Note: The M1 chart shown in Part 1 more clearly shows the trend in the M1 money supply increase.

Again, the YoY percentage change is more revealing:

The inflationists also point to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) which shows price increases:

The YoY rate of change of the CPI clearer:

As the chart reveals, prices have been rising since mid-2009. Even the measure of Core CPI (CPI less energy and food, CPILFENS) appears to be rising:

The inflationists would say that this effect of inflation, rising prices, is a classic measure that proves new money is hitting the economy and that has caused, among other things, prices to rise.

The Deflation Argument

The deflationists have a different take on the data. They point to theories by economist Steve Keen which states that first banks make loans, and then the Fed increases money supply to meet demand. According to Keen and Mish, money supply is created first by banks making loans, then by the Fed supplying the money, because you can’t increase money supply without getting it into the economy. If there is no lending the money supply remains unchanged. Thus it is a rise in credit that leads to money supply growth.

Mish also argues that excess reserves don’t really exist; they are a fiction created by the Fed, a mere computer entry. If you consider all the loans made by lenders, and the actual or potential defaults of their loans, those losses would absorb all the “excess” reserves. Therefore, those “reserves” are more or less spoken for and don’t represent money for making new loans.

Mish also believes that reserves aren’t the problem with banks; rather it is their shaky capital base. Lending is constrained by their lack of capital and financial instability rather than by reserves.

The deflationists say that because the size and breadth of the crash in the real estate markets and related debt, the problem is too big for the Fed to handle. Until debt is deleveraged and banks and businesses repair their balance sheets, the Fed’s effort to increase the money supply is like pushing on the proverbial string.

The result is that real estate asset prices are declining and that results in deflation. They say it is similar to what the Japanese experienced in the late ‘80s and ‘90s, when they experienced almost zero growth, no inflation, and declining asset values. Banks, they say, are not going to lend until this deleveraging occurs and businesses become solvent and creditworthy.

The deflationists say that the current measures of prices are inaccurate because they don’t reflect the declining values of real estate. If real estate was factored in, then prices would be shown as declining. The only measure of real estate in the CPI computation is what is called the real estate rental equivalent which measures the rental value of homes rather than their asset value.

They suggest that prices are indeed falling anyway if you look at Core CPI (CPI less energy and food) on a year-over-year percentage change basis:

Obviously there is some evidence of declining prices as shown by this chart.

Which is it: Inflation or Deflation?

Let me suggest a way of looking at the problem.

We understand that inflation or deflation is a monetary phenomenon, not just an increase or decrease in prices. And, in order to cause inflation new money must find its way into the economy.

There are several ways the Fed can do that.

The Fed can make cheap money available by lowering the interest rate on money it lends out, which increases money supply. Even with the Fed Funds rate at 0.18%, effectively zero, this doesn’t seem to be working.

The Fed can make it easier for banks to lend. This seems to be a problem for the Fed right now. As we have seen previously, lending is way down, excess reserves are high, and the money multiplier has fallen dramatically. This hasn’t worked either.

Yet money supply has been increasing despite the failure of these policies.

There is another tool in the Fed’s arsenal called Open Market Operations (OMO) whereby it buys and sells securities with its primary dealers. For example, buying Treasury paper from dealers increases money supply and selling decreases money supply.

Starting in January 2009, the Fed began a program of buying mortgage backed securities (MBS) issued by Fannie, Freddie, and Ginnie Mae. At its peak, they bought $1.25 trillion of these assets, pumping up money supply by that amount. The purpose was to get liquidity into the economy and try to revive credit and economic activity. Further it absorbed the risk of these “toxic” assets, relieving the former holders of their bad investment decisions.

This form of money inflation does not have the impact of the money multiplier were those funds in the hands of bankers who would lend out the new money, but it does represent a substantial amount of new money injected into the system.

This money infusion is being used by the very willing sellers of these toxic assets, the big investment banks or the investment banking operations of the big commercial banks, not so much for  making loans, but for their own investment purposes; this money has been driving the financial markets.

Deflationists vs. Inflationists vs. Modified Inflationists

This is the point where the inflationists and deflationists part. The inflationists believe that the Fed can and will increase the money supply any time they wish through open market operations. The deflationists believe it doesn’t matter what the Fed will do because banks are not in a position to resume lending, thus counteracting the Fed’s attempts at increasing the money supply.

I have a different take on this, but it is a bit complicated to explain. To try to put it in a nutshell:

  1. I don’t agree with the deflationists that we will be just like Japan: continued deflation which would be the result of keeping alive bankrupt (zombie) banks and corporations.
  2. I part a bit with inflationists because I don’t believe Open Market Operations will have the inflationary impact they believe will occur. I believe that bank lending, the best tool for inflating money supply will remain constrained and be a drag on the economy.
  3. I believe that as the economy goes into a double-dip recession, the Fed will create ways to inflate that will be effective.

I refer to my position as Modified Inflationism.

Predictions and a Decision Tree

Here is the problem in trying to forecast what will happen in the future: tell me what the Fed and the government will do. Remember the Freakonomics’ humorous take on forecasting:

The future will be different from the present to some degree and some point, and I have anecdotes and hearsay to prove it.

Austrian types don’t believe that you can use econometric models to predict the future because such models are usually wrong. You can’t distill millions and millions of economic decisions down to a simple or even complex formula of human behavior because the data set is too vast to be useful. We believe you have to understand why individuals do things in the economy first before you can study data. These were some of the breakthroughs of the great economists Mises and Hayek.

To figure out what the Fed might do involves a lot of probabilities. And that is my method of analysis: what are the probabilities that the Fed will do one thing rather than another when faced with different circumstances. It is much like constructing a decision tree to see where they can go. If X happens, then the Fed’s choices are A, B, and C. What are the consequences of each and what is more likely to happen.

Stick with me.


Tomorrow, Part 3. The double dip economy, the Fed's choices, and their fear of deflation.

After Part 4, I will publish the entire article as one downloadable PDF.



[1] The True Money Supply (TMS) was formulated by Murray Rothbard and represents the amount of money in the economy that is available for immediate use in exchange. It has been referred to in the past as the Austrian Money Supply, the Rothbard Money Supply and the True Money Supply. The benefits of TMS over conventional measures calculated by the Federal Reserve are that it counts only immediately available money for exchange and does not double count. MMMF shares are excluded from TMS precisely because they represent equity shares in a portfolio of highly liquid, short-term investments which must be sold in exchange for money before such shares can be redeemed. It includes: Currency Component of M1, Total Checkable Deposits, Savings Deposits, U.S. Government Demand Deposits and Note Balances, Demand Deposits Due to Foreign Commercial Banks, and Demand Deposits Due to Foreign Official Institutions. There are different takes on TMS. See http://mises.org/content/nofed/chart.aspx?series=TMS.


Gold Seeker Weekly Wrap-Up: Gold and Silver End Barely Lower on the Week

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 04:00 PM PDT

Gold rose as much as $13.59 to as high as $1258.29 by early afternoon in New York before it fell back off a bit in the last hour of trade, but it still ended with a gain of 0.85% and ended just $1.35 from last Friday's all-time closing high. Silver climbed to as high as $19.13 before it also dropped back a bit, but it still ended with a gain of 2.19%.


Commodities Week: Oil and Copper Rally on China, Gold Regains its Footing

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 03:19 PM PDT

Sumit Roy submits:
Energy

Despite a down week in broad financial markets, crude oil advanced 2.2% in the period. Early on Monday, prices got a boost from news that China would allow more flexibility in the Yuan/Dollar exchange rate. Traders bid up risk assets, hoping that the move would be a step in the direction of correcting imbalances in the world economy. Moreover, the potential increased purchasing power of the Chinese currency was seen as a positive for commodity demand. As early as late Monday, however, the optimism over the China news gave way to renewed selling, as global economic concerns came back in focus. As the week progressed, weak economic releases out of the U.S—data on housing was downright ugly—kept the pressure on financial markets. The S&P 500 finished the week down 3.6%; the stock index logged only a single up session in the entire period.

The dismal performance of stocks highlights just how impressive crude oil’s own performance was during the week. After the washout in May that sent oil prices as low as $64.24/barrel, the commodity has been on a steady upswing. Over the last three sessions, prices have successfully tested the trendline that defines that very upswing. The $75.50 level that corresponds to the trendline, is also former-resistance-turned-support, hence this ‘double support’ is looking like a tough nut to crack. Caution is warranted, however, for further steep losses in equities would surely spill over into crude oil eventually. On the upside, the psychological $80 level is the first level of resistance.


Taking a look at U.S. storage
, the EIA reported that in the week ending June 18, crude oil inventories rose 2 million barrels, gasoline inventories fell 0.8 million barrels, distillate inventories rose 0.3 million barrels, and total petroleum inventories rose 2.7 million barrels.
U.S. petroleum inventories are now 6.4% above the 5-year average, down from 6.6% last week. U.S. crude oil production was flat week-over-week. Year-to-date, production is up 3.5% year-over-year. Output levels will be closely watched to see whether the situation in the Gulf of Mexico is having any impact.

After breaking above the level last week, natural gas fell back below $5/mmbtu this week, as prices sank 2.8%. The primary culprit for the latest move was once again weather, as forecasts are calling for a cool down in parts of the East and South going forward. Additionally, a tropical depression heading over the Yucatan peninsula currently, is expected to make its way up toward the Gulf Coast next week, which will have a dampening effect on cooling demand.

Complete Story »


Close But No Cigar!

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 02:59 PM PDT


Via Pension Pulse.

Angela Charlton of the Boston Globe reports, French prime minister urges big cost-cutting:

France's Prime Minister Francois Fillon on Friday rebuffed unions angry over plans to raise the retirement age by two years, urging the French to show "courage" and make an unprecedented effort to cut the enormous national debt.

 

The government said Friday it's considering freezing public sector salaries for the next three years -- a prospect that prompted unions to slam the door on salary talks with the labor minister in protest.

 

Unions are energized after nationwide strikes and protests Thursday that brought nearly a million people to the streets to protest President Nicolas Sarkozy's bid to reform a money-losing pension system. The reform includes raising the retirement age from 60 to 62 -- which would still be among the lowest in Europe.

 

Fillon defended the pension reform at a news conference hastily arranged after Thursday's protests.

 

Fillon said he "understands the worries" of workers, but added, "We must break the spiral of indebtedness. ... We need a bit of courage."

 

He carefully avoided using the word "austerity," saying it was too soon to impose cutbacks like the more sweeping ones introduced in Germany or some other European countries.

 

He spoke as Sarkozy and Finance Minister Christine Lagarde were heading to Canada for meetings of the G-8, or Group of Eight, and later the G-20, or Group of 20 leading world economies.

 

A key subject at the discussions will be how to revive the world economy after global financial meltdown, and how much and how fast to cut government spending.

 

Lagarde said on France-Inter radio Friday that France's pension reform is the government's way of "trying to send a message of security to the markets" about France's commitment to cutting its debt.

 

The French budget deficit was at 7.5 percent of gross domestic product last year. The conservative government has vowed to bring it under 3 percent -- the threshold set by the European Union -- by 2013. The Greek crisis has given added urgency to France's plans to cut back.

 

Fillon insisted that the pension reform and other cost-cutting would not threaten to slow the economic recovery, and reiterated forecasts that the French economy will grow 1.4 percent this year after contracting 2.5 percent last year.

 

Fillon said the retirement reform will save nearly euro19 billion ($29.3 billion) in 2018 and should bring the pension system back into the black that year.

 

Unions say money for the pension system should come from higher taxes or charges on those who are still working, and see cost-cutting in the pension system as an attack on a hard-fought way of life. The government says that given rising life expectancy, workers must retire later.

 

Unions have long feared that public sector salaries could be targeted in cost-cutting measures, and the government confirmed Friday that a 3-year salary freeze is on the table, according to Jean-Marc Canon, head of the CGT-Fonction Publique union.

 

He was part of salary talks with Labor Minister Eric Woerth on Friday that ended in a union walkout.

Feeling the heat, French president Nicolas Sarkozy said cigars are out and perks will be cut ahead of austerity measures:

Parliamentary pensions, a lavish Bastille Day garden party and ministers’ Cuban cigars are to be sacrificed in the name of economic recovery as the French government seeks to show that ministers are sharing the pain of their austerity drive.

 

With his government attempting to raise the retirement age and bracing people for cuts of €45 billion in public spending, president Nicolas Sarkozy has said ministers must lead by example and reduce their own budgets. France has not yet set out a detailed austerity package, but the national auditing office recently called for urgent moves to trim the deficit.

 

It is widely believed that Mr Sarkozy will cancel the traditional July 14th garden party at the Elysée Palace, an annual event that was attended by 7,000 people last year and cost more than €700,000.

 

Ministers are also to be ordered to cut the number of people employed in their cabinets (private offices), while a reduction in the number of ministers is expected in the next reshuffle.

 

The government’s belt-tightening follows a series of damaging revelations about ministers’ extravagant lifestyles and waste of public money.

 

It was reported this week that prime minister François Fillon had asked junior minister Christian Blanc to reimburse the state €12,000 of taxpayers’ money which was used to buy expensive cigars.

 

Le Canard Enchaîné, which has specialised in publishing details of ministers’ expenses, had published receipts from a Paris cigar shop for high-end Cuban brands that were billed to the government.

 

Mr Blanc, a former head of Air France who is now junior minister for the greater Paris area, blamed a staff member for the purchases and has already reimbursed €3,500 for those he had smoked.

 

Further embarrassment followed when it was revealed that Christine Boutin, a minister sacked last year by Mr Sarkozy, was still earning €18,000 a month from the state thanks to a parliamentary pension and a special “mission” from the president to write a report on globalisation.

 

Ms Boutin said she would keep the pension and give up the € 9,000 a month for the report.

 

The Boutin controversy then led to five ministers who were drawing a parliamentary pension being ordered to forego them as long as they served in the cabinet.

 

Until recently, the generous perks and privileges given to France’s ruling class had attracted relatively little scrutiny, but the economic crisis, public disquiet and regular leaks have shone a harsh light on the system.

 

Two months ago, Mr Fillon ordered ministers to take only commercial flights after his state secretary for overseas development, Alain Joyandet, spent €116,500 chartering a private jet to attend a conference in Martinique.

 

Another perk in peril is the free Paris flat that goes automatically with cabinet rank, whether needed or not.

 

That one hit the headlines when industry minister Christian Estrosi was revealed to be occupying rooms at the Economics Ministry in eastern Paris while lending a relative his official apartment overlooking the Eiffel Tower on the other side of the city.

 

Fadela Amara, state secretary for urban affairs, admitted this month that family members sometimes used her official apartment in the same upmarket district while she stayed in her own more humble flat in a working-class part of the city.

 

The revelations about ministers’ royal-style perks have been especially damaging because they coincide with the government’s attempts to prepare the public for severe spending cuts.

 

Didier Migaud, the head of the national auditing office, said savings of €45 billion would be needed and that the government would be required to take a “very sharp turn” on public finances.

 

France, alone among the biggest European economies, has yet to set out details of a savings plan, but a spokesman for Mr Sarkozy said measures would be outlined in the coming weeks.

What are those French ministers smoking? Meanwhile, Reuters reports that the Greek government agreed on Friday the most radical shake-up of its pension system in decades to avert bankruptcy and satisfy foreign lenders despite fierce opposition at home:

The reform cuts benefits, curbs widespread early retirement, increases the number of contribution years from 35-37 to 40 and raises women's retirement age from 60 to match men on 65.

 

"We inherited a pension system which had collapsed and we are fixing it," Labour Minister Andreas Loverdos told a news conference after the cabinet approved the cuts.

 

"It is our responsibility to save the country from bankruptcy."

 

The ruling socialists face a battle over the reforms, agreed as part of a 110 billion euro ($147.6 billion) emergency loan package from the EU and IMF. Most voters oppose the reforms and a strike on June 29 will gauge the strength of public discontent as lawmakers start debating the bill.

 

"The draft pension bill ... is slaughtering fundamental pension rights," public sector union ADEDY said in a statement.

 

By contrast, the EU Commision in Brussels praised the overhaul as respecting the loan deal.

 

"We welcome it as a major step towards improving the sustainability of public finances," spokesman Amadeu Altafaj Tardio said.

 

The socialist party has 157 of 300 seats in parliament and the reform is likely to pass despite some criticism from its ranks.

 

Analysts see the Greek pension reform as a test case. It goes beyond tax increases and public wage cuts to tackle a sector which epitomises many of the woes that have caused the country's downfall, including tax evasion, red tape, selective privileges and delayed reforms.

And if you think things are bad in Greece and France, here comes Romania where protests are taking place over pension, wage cuts:

Hundreds of people were protesting Friday in the Romanian capital over cuts to public wages and pensions, the spokesman for the country's president said.

Unions said there were 600 people outside the presidential palace, but the spokesman said there were about 400.

 

Anti-riot police had to stop about 25 or 30 people who went past the barricades, spokesman Valaureu Turan told CNN.

 

Prime Minister Emil Boc recently announced a 25 percent cut in public sector wages and a 15 percent cut in pensions. The Constitutional Court of Romania ruled Friday that part of the laws are not constitutional, so the government will have to decide on the next step, Turan said.

As you can see, the global pension war is spreading fast. Change is brutal and workers are angry. Who can blame them? They're seeing banksters get away with billions in bonuses and bailouts, and now that the pension Ponzi is running out of money, they're stuck having to work longer to make up for the shortfall.

As for the capitalist ruling class pushing these reforms, they're all saying 'close but no cigar'. If Marx were alive today, he'd be pouring over pension legislation and pension documents, trying to understand how the financial capitalists have stolen trillions from common workers, engineering the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of mankind, and leaving them with massive debts in the form of pension IOUs.


Bond Bubble?

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 02:36 PM PDT

Prior to Greece, the markets perceived rapid government debt growth was a stabilizing force. More recently, the marketplace is coming to appreciate that runaway fiscal deficits are destabilizing and problematic. Read More...



Gold Daily Chart: The Cup and Handle Is Now Fully Formed; Longer Term Projections

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 01:29 PM PDT


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Will The Gold Price Rise Short-Term?

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 01:00 PM PDT

The G-8 & G-20 meetings are scheduled for this weekend and the press and observers are disappointed before they have even begun. Division between the U.S. approach to growth and sovereign debt containment and repayment and the European approach should be added to fears that sovereign debt cut backs will not be achieved in the end.


MUCH Higher Gold and Silver Prices are Coming - Buy, or be Left Behind

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 11:46 AM PDT

Gold Price Close Today : 1,255.80Gold Price Close June 11: 1,257.20Change: -1.40 or -0.1%Silver Price Close Today : 19.11Silver Price Close June 11 : 19.175Change -6.50 cents or -0.3%Platinum Price...

This is a summary only. Visit GOLDPRICE.ORG for the full article, gold price charts in ounces grams and kilos in 23 national currencies, and more!


Ben Bernanke: Party's Over We Need More Money

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 11:44 AM PDT

(snippet)
"We're heading towards a double-dip recession," said Chris Whalen, a former Fed official and now head of Institutional Risk Analystics. "The party is over from fiscal support. These hard-money men are fighting the last war: they don't recognise that money velocity has slowed and we are going into deflation. The only default option left is to crank up the printing presses again."
Mr Bernanke is so worried about the chemistry of the Fed's voting body – the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) – that he has persuaded vice-chairman Don Kohn to delay retirement until Janet Yellen has been confirmed by the Senate to take over his post. Mr Kohn has been a key architect of the Fed's emergency policies. He was due to step down this week after 40 years at the institution, depriving Mr Bernanke of a formidable ally in policy circles.
The Fed's statement this week shows growing doubts about the health of the recovery. Growth is no longer "strengthening": it is "proceeding". Financial conditions are now "less supportive" due to Europe's debt crisis.
The subtle tweaks in language have been enough to set bond markets alight. The yield on 10-year Treasuries has fallen to 3.08pc, the lowest since the gloom of April 2009. Futures contracts have ruled out tightening until well into next year. 


Even Taxes are Pretty in Pink

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 11:00 AM PDT

A new PM likely means new policies, so we won't be too judgemental... yet. Instead, we will let her do the talking. But we don't know which quote to choose:

"My name is Julia Gillard and I am not smarter than a Fifth Grader."

"It's a great day for redheads," Australia's new Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, is said to have proclaimed...

Even Taxes are Pretty in Pink

Ken Henry has redefined himself as the personification of Political Risk. Uncertainty kills economic activity. There is nothing more uncertain than an academic turned bureaucrat with political influence.

And speaking of rose coloured glasses, the Labour government has been criticised for its lack of real world experience. Cushy government jobs cover their CVs. But Ken Henry is different. He has no private sector experience at all, according to the Treasury website.

So it's fair to say that Ken hasn't contributed to what Bill Bonner would call the "producing" sector of the economy. Instead, he has been toiling away in the parasite sector, living off other's taxes.

That's why Henry has been so cordial about the Resource Super Profits Tax furore. It's all pink to him. While the RSPT has brought Labour into election losing territory, with marginal seats swinging enough to hit 6s, Ken has been quietly contemplating how he could make things worse.

He managed to do so at a tax conference in Sydney. Yes, a tax conference.

"A super-profits tax should be rolled out for all companies in Australia as a long-term reform."

Your editor's reaction to this was an unsavoury one. Deeply unsavoury. But the story only got horrifyingly worse.

Displaying his inclinations, the essence of Henry's speech was him "complaining about the difficulty in converting academic ideas on tax into practical policy..." according to David Uren of The Australian.

Poor Ken, can't get his rosy classroom dreams into legislation.

But does Henry really mean what he said? Tax all company profits beyond the "risk free" yield of a Government bond? Dan reported some details on Tuesday. But the quotes need repeating:

"Dr Henry said yesterday a tax system known as the "allowance for corporate equity" held the most promise.

"... this would allow companies to earn a return on their equity investment, which should be no greater than the government bond rate. Profits higher than this would be treated as a super profit or economic rent, and would be taxed at a higher rate."

So in Australia, the incentive is to decrease profits! And any clever entrepreneurs, take your idea elsewhere.

Forcing the more productive, intelligent and resourceful people in the economy to bear the weight of those who should be going out of business is just stupid. That hasn't stopped countries from trying it. But the IMF points out that most countries abandon it. And what would happen to government revenue when the economy slows?

Mr Political Risk has also decided to tell economists to "put down their weapons" and "back the Tax". This is where the rose coloured glasses come off.

"He said it was 'unbelievably frustrating, incredibly frustrating' for people advising governments of both stripes that economists seemed 'loath to come to a consensus position on anything'."

It's no surprise that Henry finds disagreement inconvenient for his lofty ideas. But he goes on to criticize just having a debate on the issue! That's right, according to your Treasury Secretary, you shouldn't discuss the RSPT! In fact, your opinion has to be in accordance with government policy, for a while:

"But I think there are occasions on which economists might, at least for a period, put down their weapons and join a consensus.... There are times when it would serve the national interest if economists could just call a halt to the war for a while.''

Presumably the "for a while" means "until the legislation is enacted". Once the law is passed, you can argue all you want...

And the final development in this story is purely an amusing one. If you click on the link here, you get taken to an article entitled "Back the Tax, Henry Tells Economists". Only that isn't what the original title was. Here is the link in full: http://www.theage.com.au/business/keep-shtum-henry-tells-economists-20100621-ysek.html

The key words there are "keep-shtum-henry-tells-economists". Stum (pronounced shtum) is the German word for "shut the hell up".

The Daily Reckoning Australia would like to congratulate whoever came up with this title. And to whoever changed it, the Gestapo and Mr Henry would be proud.

But all this hullabaloo could be about nothing after all:

"The government will not be adopting that model in Australia,'' the [now former] prime minister told parliament ..."

Where exactly the Government does plan on implementing the tax remains unclear. Perhaps Germany? That would make it more popular down under.

It seems Henry will have to stick to academic ideas for now. But with a former communist in charge, who knows? Julia might not even stop to think about the precious housing market, which Dan Denning reported has been hit by the RSPT as well.

Lessons in political uncertainty

One of the few places to be on par with Ken Henry's "uncertainty boom" is the USA. There, the President has put a six month moratorium on issuing deep water drilling permits, as well as calling for exploratory drilling to stop at 33 oil wells. But now "U.S. District Judge Feldman in a separate order today "immediately prohibited" the U.S. from enforcing the drilling moratorium, finding the offshore companies would otherwise incur "irreparable harm."

Oops, irreparable harm! Six months would destroy the oil industry! But wait...

"Energy companies won't resume operations until they have "more certainty" on drilling and what the federal government plans to do, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal said today during a press conference."

So they won't survive stopping, but won't start until they know whether they are going to go or not...

Regardless, the American Petroleum Institute disagrees with Jindal:

"With this ruling, our industry and its people can get back to work to provide Americans with the energy they need, and do it safely and without harming the environment."

But Jindal wasn't finished:

"You can't just turn this switch on and off," Jindal said. "Once these rigs leave the Gulf, they may be gone for years."

All this reminds your editor of a Beatles song. It probably wasn't about oil, but here goes:

You say yes, I say no
You say stop and I say go, go, go
Oh, no
You say goodbye and I say hello
Hello, hello
I don't know why you say goodbye
I say hello
Hello, hello
I don't know why you say goodbye
I say hello

As you know, what investment doesn't like is uncertainty. And, as evidenced by what you have just been singing, that is what it is getting.

Jud Bailey, an analyst at Jefferies & Co. in Houston. "Investors, as it relates to the drillers, are for the most part staying away. There's too much uncertainty, too much headline risk."

So oil investment suffers. And that bodes ill for the broader highway economy of the USA.

Another one bites the dust

US bank failures continue at a rapid pace. Rapid pace being double that of last year. By the time you read this, the next couple of banks will be joining the 83 on the list so far for 2010.

This news is easy to gloss over and laugh about. Depositors get bailed out by the US's insurance scheme anyway...

But how did the US end up with such a mess of a banking system? Well, the answer is a long and drawn out one. No doubt you will know that regulation is to blame. But consider this: The safest banking system in history (for depositors) was when there was no regulation at all. Contract and criminal law was about it. There was no central bank and each bank printed as many of its own notes as it liked. Sounds ridiculous, right? So why did it disappear and how did the Americans get it so wrong?

Find out more here.

Why Greece?

An update on Europe's tumour state is due. This article says it best:

"There are a number of things that show we are on a different path eight months after we've taken on a government in a crisis," Papandreou said in New York, where he came for a two-day meeting of the Socialist International, a global organization of social democratic, socialist and labor parties he has headed since January 2006.

We have a socialist in charge of the world's debt troubled country. Wonderful. No wonder Greek CDS spreads are supposedly at an all time high.

And Greeks have picked up on their future:

"A June 17 poll of 2,100 Greeks showed 52.6 percent believe the country would default."

Bummer.

But who would have thought they would follow the (formerly) outrageous advice of a German politician and sell their islands?

Government in action

Hugo Chavez is doing his best to imitate the incompetence of western leaders. Sadly, he is also a genuine socialist, so when he stuffs up, it's big time. And he can't shift the blame onto the free market.

Venezuelans Troops have been busy "administrating" the poor of their rice and powdered milk, which they had illegally bought at elevated prices. But it turns out that the food shortages aren't solely due to wealthy elites fuelling inflation and hoarding food (believe it or not):

"[Critics] point to 80,000 tons of rotting food found in warehouses belonging to the government as evidence the state is a poor and corrupt administrator."

"Fighting back, Chavez says he is in an economic war against the "parasitic bourgeoisie" that tries to convince Venezuelans that socialism does not work by twisting facts and taking advantage of honest mistakes."

Oh, is that what they were.

The Greenspan Slam

According to the former Federal Reserve Chairman, the buck may soon stop for the US government. Literally.

"Perceptions of a large U.S. borrowing capacity are misleading. Despite the surge in federal debt to the public during the past 18 months - to $8.6 trillion from $5.5 trillion - inflation and long-term interest rates, the typical symptoms of fiscal excess, have remained remarkably subdued. This is regrettable, because it is fostering a sense of complacency that can have dire consequences."

If the Chinese stick to their implied implications and abandon the currency peg, this would further decrease the demand for Treasuries. That's because the Chinese would be selling less Yuan to keep its value down. That means fewer dollars in their coffers to invest in treasuries.

But why the deficits anyway? Keynesianism is out of fashion... again.

"Nobody can seriously dispute that excessive public debts, not only in Europe, are one of the main causes of this crisis," Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble told reporters in Berlin today alongside Merkel. "That's why they have to be reduced."

German Economy Minister Rainer Bruederle, at a separate press conference earlier today, said the U.S. must join Europe in "urgently" cutting spending.

"It's urgently necessary for monetary stability that public budgets return to balance," Bruederle said. "This is something we should also tell our American friends."

But Obama isn't listening:

President Barack Obama, in a letter to his G-20 counterparts dated June 16, urged a focus on economic growth, saying order to public finances should be restored in the "medium term."

Even the head of "Socialists International" has picked up on the need for austerity. When will Obama? When will he learn what Merkel (and Cameron) already know: "It's not about growth at any price, it's about sustainable" growth.

But dissent within the Democratic Party is growing. And it's worth noting that the Dems can be even more concerned about budgets than rival Republicans. In response to out of control borrowing, they have decided not to pass a budget! (Not a joke.) Pretty soon, they will be following Romania's lead and asking for donations to pay down the debt. But nobody can surpass Maywood, California, which has fired all government employees (including the police).

Monetary Ignorance

Paul Krugman has provided his ever worthless two cents again:

Nobel prize-winning economist Paul Krugman said the U.S. isn't worried about "loose monetary policy" and said it would be a risk for the euro region to allow Axel Weber, president of the Bundesbank, to succeed Jean-Claude Trichet as head of the European Central Bank, German newspaper Handelsblatt reported

"If you're looking for somebody who aims at an inflation rate of zero percent while unemployment rises to 13 percent, then Weber is certainly the right man," the newspaper quoted Krugman as saying.

This is infuriating. It was Paul Volker who rescued the US from its last inflationary bout specifically with the policies that Krugman demonises. He probably considers stagflation to be impossible, despite its occurrence just a few decades ago. (That's not a long time for an economist.)

Correction

Thanks to Raj and the other readers who pointed out my error in last week's edition:

Raj to Daily Reckoning Australia,

As a long time reader I must say I've always found the perspectives shone on markets and economics by the daily reckoning refreshing at the least, however, I just have one quick comment because of something you said that made me cringe in your article below, and that was:

"Free markets! It's a government institution - the U.S. Federal Reserve - that is providing the liquidity, via low interest rates and outright buying of government securities, to keep bond yields low. That's the opposite of free markets."

The Federal Reserve is as federal as Federal Express, it's a private institution, every man and his dog ought to know this by now! At first I felt like the one of the only voices saying this years ago but even the popular online media knows this now and I find it a bit shocking that you guys still think the Federal Reserve is a Government Institution.

The popular online media I refer to which covers some of the detail is here.

Cheerio

Indeed, Raj and other readers were right to complain. A more accurate explanation would have been to say that the Federal Reserve is a private bank that has a monopoly power on money creation, granted by legislation.

The question of who it is accountable to and who controls it is an open one.

Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property - until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

We have had the inflationary boom of the bubble years and the deflationary period is upon us. But Jefferson may not have foreseen just how good the central bankers would get at money printing...

Until next week,

Nickolai Hubble.
The Daily Reckoning Week in Review

Similar Posts:


Barney Frank Brings Additional Unclarity On The FinReg Scam, Punts Again On All Fannie/Freddie Questions

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 10:22 AM PDT


In case you just can't get enough of of Barney Frank simply oozing truth, integrity and unbribable honesty (in other words, everything that defines the American Congressional way) in every interview he does, this Bloomberg TV clip is for you. It is also for everyone else who would rather not read the 2,000 pages of FinReg reform yet wants to get some sense if they will be sued next Monday for lifting a 5MM offer of UK CDS. Overall, Barney mumbles about this and that, discusses whether the bill will make banks less profitable (it won't), clarifies the 3% loophole for JPMorgan's investment in Highbridge,  notes the surprising $19 billion bank levy, yet runs like a scolded schoolgirl the second Fannie and Freddie (also known as the one biggest disaster of his career, and the only thing he will be remembered for) are mentioned. "My Republican colleagues like to forget the fact that during the 12 years they controlled Congress, they did nothing about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. When the Democrats took power in 2007, we passed a bill that gave them the power to put them into conservatorship. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac today are not what they were, thanks to a bill passed by a Democratic congress…They are in conservatorship. The notion that we haven't done anything is a lie, and they know that." The more important thing Barney, is that the American are fully aware that any pretense of reform coming from you is a lie, and they most certainly know that.

 


Full notes from Barney Frank on today's bill:

"I think we have a tougher bill than we'd been hoping to get… In every case, the informed opinion was that we'd never get it done. In fact, we did."On the agreement reached today: 

"It is in the House, because we don't need 60%...Senator Dodd has done an excellent job. He was conscious throughout of the need to keep 60 votes. Frankly, there are some things in the bill that are not there that I would have liked there. I think we have done a great deal more than many thought we could. I believe Senator Dodd is on track to get the 60 votes."

On whether the bill will make American banks less profitable:


"It depends…To the extent that bank profits on things other than lending go down, I think that is a good thing. Banks were set up with deposit insurance to accumulate capital and make it available to people doing things productively….I already helped get a bill through on reducing profits banks make on credit cards. I'm proud of that. I think they have overcharged people on the fees."

"Yes, an increasing amount of what has been done by not just banks, but also investment houses -- we have seen too much financial activity for its own sake, rather than what it should be, a means to the end of productive capacity. Yes, I hope we will have shrunk some of this trading with each other on synthetic derivatives that like fantasy football rather than having any real economic activity. I think it would be a healthy thing if some of the profits made on some of those financial shenanigans would shrink."On Senator Lincoln's provisions being modified:

"Senator Lincoln was perfectly satisfied. There were two provisions that she put forward. The one I had trouble with, she acquiesced. One was to push derivatives out of the banks…She also had in there a requirement for a fiduciary responsibility between people doing swaps with pension funds and others. The pension funds objected. She acquiesced and we fixed that one. On the basic part, on the derivatives, it's essentially what she asked for. I want to stress there were two aspects of the derivatives. Even more important, no matter who does them, they had to be made much more transparent. They had to have capital requirements. I believe we achieved that."

On the Volker rule and derivatives provision:

"A 3% investment, we don't think that endangers the bank, especially since there are other restrictions. There are strict restrictions on derivatives. There were strict restrictions on making loans and selling the whole loans. Yes, I believe that what we have done here, the 3% maximum, is perfectly reasonable. I do not think a 3% investment will endanger them."

On whether American banks will be at a disadvantage compared to international banks:

"I've had more conversations with international leaders now than ever before. [Before] my ocus had been domestic."

"There is a widespread agreement that the European Union and the United Kingdom, I've  spoken to people in Canada and others, to all move in the same direction.  There's not one government internationally that can do it and there shouldn't be. But there is general movement in the same direction."

"For instance, one of the things I heard from one of my conservative friends here was setting up an independent consumer bureau was a terribly radical idea because you're going to have the bureau not care about the safety and soundness of the bank. That has just been done in England.

"As a result of the leadership we've taken -- the president urged us to get this done by yesterday-- although, there were other reasons to get it done. I think you will see American leadership lead to more regulation worldwide."

On whether there is the need for a separate bank tax in addition to the $19B levy: 

"I think there may be. We have required the financial institutions to pay for regulating themselves and some of the damages they have caused. We had people who made bad decisions to borrow money and we cannot bail them out, I'm sorry that they did that, we can try to ease the pain in other ways. I'm talking about mortgages. There are people who make very irresponsible decisions to take a mortgage and they cannot pay them now because of unemployment has been so much worse. We set up a fund to lend them money, not give it to them, to pay their mortgages, and then they have to pay it back. I think that it is fair to have the people who helped create the mortgage crisis pay for that. That's a $2B fund."

"The amount we are asking the large financial institutions to contribute every year -- it is certainly in their bonus pool… I believe there's room to get revenue from the banks. Partly because our bill will only be in existence for five years, this is a onetime $19 billion assessment."

On Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac:


"My Republican colleagues like to forget the fact that during the 12 years they controlled Congress, they did nothing about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. When the Democrats took power in 2007, we passed a bill that gave them the power to put them into conservatorship. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac today are not what they were, thanks to a bill passed by a Democratic congress…They are in conservatorship. The notion that we haven't done anything is a lie, and they know that."

"We need to restructure housing in general. So, we plan to do that. The Republicans have no plan. We asked them how soon they wanted to do this. They said, three to five years. We're on track to do that, we have put them into conservatorship. They do not now resemble what they were before. We now will try to figure what will replace Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac because you will not have this public- private hybrid….Let's work together to get a system put in place. That's what we're doing."


Bull/Bear Weekly Recap

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 10:03 AM PDT


Submitted by UFormula of RCS Investments

Bullish

US Retail sales come in better than expected and the last two months were revised higher.  It seems that many investors may be underestimating the strength of the consumer yet again.  The average for both March and April showed an increase of 1.6%.

Industrial production rose in April by the most in 3 months.  Manufacturing continues to run strong as inventories continue to get replenished and business spending continues.  Increases in consumer spending should signal continued gains in production as factories keep up with demand.  With very low I/S ratios, any strong and sustainable increase in demand will surely translate directly to increase production and more jobs.   The virtuous cycle may be on the verge of starting.   

US Trade numbers show increasing exports, which bodes well for the S&P500 as 45%+ of earnings come from abroad.  Meanwhile the latest increase in imports had a lot to do with increased demand for actual goods and services instead of just oil, meaning that consumer demand is improving in the US, partly because of a stronger dollar.  If global trade continues to rebound, this will be a strong help for an advancing stock market.  

Wholesales inventory report shows that inventory replenishment continues.  Sales trends are also increasing and points to increases in production as the Inventory-to-Sales ratio has hit an all-time low.  

Business inventories show an increase as manufacturing continues to produce, up 5/6 months.  Sales meanwhile rose 2.3% meaning that the I/S ratio (an indicator of inventory levels relative to demand) is now at a record low.  The stage is set for a monumental inventory bounce.  Stay tuned. 

Small Business may be beginning to see the recovery as the “NFIB Small Business Survey” and “Discover Small Business Watch” show improved sentiment.


Bearish 

Inflation is heating up in China and makes the case for continued tightening of policy, currency or interest rate.  Meanwhile Europe, their largest trading partner, is conducting QE operations, which has led to a falling Euro.  This will restrain Europe’s ability to import Chinese goods as a falling currency makes foreign goods more expensive.  The Shanghai stock market is in a bear market in anticipation of tightening on a recovery that may not be sustainable. 

Even after the $1 Trillion package, the Euro continues to take it on the chin.  Another red flag is that 3-Mth Libor continues to move higher and credit markets overall don’t seem as enthused as stock markets.  It seems the euphoria has faded and chaos is back.  Is the Greece/Contagion crisis totally behind us or is the end game here?  From a global trade perspective, a falling Euro will be an increasing headwind for US and Chinese exporters.  In the S&P500, 45%+ of companies earnings come from abroad, while China is still an exporting country and will undoubtedly feel a negative effect.  Future prospects for global trade are starting to look very stormy.   

UCLA Ceridian shows a dip in it’s reading for April.  This metric has now been flat for roughly 4 months and points to a potential stall for growth in manufacturing activity in the months ahead.  Business executives need to be convinced that end demand growth is sustainable or manufacturers will see little incentive to grow production.  The ECRI leading indicator also shows slowing over the next few months.

National Federation of Independent Business Survey continues to point to weakness.  While sentiment improved from the previous month, it is not consistent with a recovery in the sector responsible for 60%+ of job creation.  If small businesses don’t see improving sales trends, recent job gains will not be sustainable.

Consumer Sentiment continues to be flat as consumers are too poor to expand their cable package and watch bubblevision all day long.  Main Street has not seen a strong recovery and these sentiment numbers are proof.  Even worse is that inflation expectations moved higher and out of a range that has latest throughout the recession.  Many point to seasonally higher gas prices.    

Mortgage applications (for purchase) plunged 9.5% as the tax credit expired and reports of falling housing prices are already surfacing.  We are seeing the first signs of the inevitable double dip in housing. 

 

Observations/Thoughts  

As expected, Treasuries have been steadily keeping up with equity returns this year.  The wall of worry remains high and deflation remains as the primary risk in my view.  I believe we will see positive returns from this asset class in 2010.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aIVhXyRrxlII&os=7

No need for extensive commentary here.  Just read these two stories and identify what’s wrong with this picture.   This isn’t the land of opportunity anymore. 

What magnitude will the effects will the oil spill have on the economy?  Tourism and fishing industries will be hurt.  How much will this shave off economic activity?

An assumption in my thesis, are the high levels of debt leading towards higher taxes and or reduced spending on the part of gov’t (see here and here).  This dynamic is not lost on Pimco’s Mohamed El-Erian….

 …However, for the time being, we are clearly experiencing a cyclical recovery (albeit very weak) and the prospect of higher earnings will keep the market from drastically selling off solely due to domestic factors.  What is increasing as a headwind are sovereign concerns as despite the bailout agreed on in the past week, the Euro keeps getting pounded.  Additionally the British Pound is beginning to become a concern.  China is overheating as well.  We are in a situation where the high probability of an external shock is beginning to get the market’s attention. 

                 

On the technical front    

(Chart of S&P500: Daily)

 Is that a head and shoulders pattern I see? Notice the 2 large distribution days.  This is bearish.


(AUD/USD: Daily)
Commodity based Australia shows a triple top with their currency thus far.  What this means is that investors are discounting a lessening probability of a rate hike.  Why?  Maybe because they are beginning to see a slow down in China as that country has been desperately trying to put the brakes on their economy.


(EUR/USD: Daily)

 Even after the $1 Trillion bailout package the currency has now hit new lows not on liquidity issues, but structural ones.  If most Eurozone countries implement austerity packages, a sure double dip would occur in my view.  Something to ponder…in today’s globalized world, would decreased spending in Europe count as the same mistake the US made in the 40s, which caused the next recession?  Bernanke and Co. have stressed that decreasing spending would send us back into a recession and that was a major policy error the government made back then.  At this point, are we so interconnected that a paring back of spending in Europe would be like us paring back spending?

 

(GBP/USD: Daily)

I have yet to see a Bloomberg article on the front page regarding the UK issues.  The currency has quietly broken through important support and has a clear shot at the lows from 2009.  A UK fiscal crisis would be the icing on the cake for the Keynesian funeral.  Mr. Hayek must be nodding his head saying “told ya so”.  I’m speculating here:  the UK can’t default because they can just print their way out of the problem, but eventually this will end up being a hyperinflationary event as confidence in the fiat currency falls. 


(DXY: Weekly)

 

I'm putting my contrarian hat on here: I hear about gold and silver being the place to be and the demise of the dollar from all fronts it seems.  The trade might be starting to get crowded.  I believe that over the longer term, we’ll see a weaker dollar as the US is up to the gills with debt, however, from a technical perspective, the above chart looks very bullish.  It’s about to break a downward trend in place for almost a decade.  Bob Farrell’s Rule 9 comes to mind.     


Have a great weekend.


Health Care and Oil Industries Attacked by Zombies

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 10:00 AM PDT

A letter to the editor of The Financial Times:

I am a pensioner and a shareholder in BP.

I understand that the board of BP is handing over to the US government $20 billion with no conditions, though the company has no legal obligations to do so. I also understand [that the] representative of the US government who has [the] responsibility for disbursing has said he will "err on the side of the claimant," an invitation to every conman in the southern USA to get his spoon into the pot at my expense.

This action by the board of BP is so financially irresponsible that I think not only chief executive Tony Hayward but every other member of the BP board needs to consider his position.

Now we will deconstruct this letter following our new Zombie Theory of History. BP is a producer. It is alive. Its flesh is solid. The blood of profits runs through its veins. The zombies are after it.

The company was doing fine. But it tripped up in the Gulf of Mexico. The zombies saw an opportunity. In order to buy time…and perhaps save itself…the company paid an enormous ransom…bribe…or tribute to the federal government.

Now, 'political risk' – more properly known as 'zombie risk' – is higher in the US than it is in emerging markets.

And now the zombies are gathering outside our window. No kidding. Busloads of them.

There's a rally by a group called "The Heart of Baltimore." Someone is spending a lot of money on it. Danny Glover is supposed to be out there. Poor man. It's about 100 degrees in the shade.

What's going on?

"Free & Fair Union Elections" is the order of the day. Ah ha…zombies! One of five Baltimore workers is allegedly working in the health care business. According to the pamphlet, they are struggling to "survive on poverty wages," because they are "without a union."

Dear readers may wonder how having a union makes what they do more valuable. We wondered too, for about 2 seconds. Of course, it doesn't. The only way the health care providers could pay higher wages would be if a) the workers were more productive or b) they raised the cost of health care. Health care is already through-the-roof expensive in the US – far more than it is in other countries. Why? Because the zombies have control of it. The US claims to have a free market in health care. It's not true. The whole system is rigged by unions, pharmacy companies, insurance companies, tort lawyers – and regulations, regulations, regulations.

We will ask you a simple question. Suppose a group of doctors set up a "McDonald's of Health Care – lowest prices in town." They said: 'We'll treat you. But only if you sign this paper saying you won't sue us.' Without the tort lawyers breathing down their necks they could eliminate their malpractice insurance and cut out all the unnecessary tests.

And then…suppose a drug company decided to launch a brand of Free Market Drugs. They offered customers 'unapproved drugs…neither tested nor reviewed by the FDA or anyone else…take them at your own risk!'

How long would these companies last? About 24 hours. Too many zombies.

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Health Care and Oil Industries Attacked by Zombies originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today's markets. Its been called "the most entertaining read of the day."


FRIDAY Market Excerpts

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 09:37 AM PDT

Gold closes just below all-time high

The COMEX August gold futures contract closed up $10.30 Friday at $1256.20, trading between $1241.60 and $1259.50

June 25, p.m. excerpts:
(from Marketwatch)
Gold futures ended tantalizingly close to a fresh record as the precious metal continued to benefit from strong investor demand and jitters ahead of this weekend's Group of 20 nations' meeting. Gold's road toward the record "was a slow, steady advance, which is much better than" fear-fueled sudden highs, said Frank Lesh, broker with FuturePath Trading. "We still expect $1,300″ in the near term, he added. The dollar index was 0.4% lower at 85.34, providing gold with extra oomph on the day…more
(from Bloomberg)
"Investors are adjusting to the Fed's rate outlook and the amount of liquidity that's out there. A lot of assets are looking at a significantly lower dollar," said Frank McGhee, head dealer at Integrated Brokerage Services LLC. Adam Klopfenstein, senior market strategist at Lind-Waldock, noted that "Gold rallying is indicative of investor skittishness. We still have debt overseas and an economic slowdown. Investors are uncomfortable holding paper assets."…more
(from Dow Jones)
Investors were buying more of the yellow metal after the U.S. government revised down for the second time its estimate of economic growth in the first three months of 2010, perceiving the metal to be a safer bet than equities or industrial commodities amid concerns about the economic recovery. Participants also wanted to park some money in gold versus paper currencies just in case there are some market-moving announcements from the G-20 summit over the weekend, said Sterling Smith, analyst with Country Hedging…more
(from AP)
The rally in gold came as world leaders went to Toronto to debate the best ways to keep the recovery on track while balancing the need to keep up stimulus spending and getting budget deficits under control. The United States believes nations should be cautious about reducing or eliminating stimulus measures too quickly, but several nations have moved to cut spending and boost taxes to offset budget shortfalls…more
(from Reuters)
Gold has benefited from perceptions that governments were quietly trying to depreciate their currencies to help boost exports and growth. Markets were also watching the cost of protecting Greek government debt against default rise to a record high today. VM Group analyst Jessica Cross noted that "Sovereign risk has attracted establishment money into gold, which tends to be long-term money. It's about adding safe-haven security to portfolios."…more

see full news, 24-hr newswire…

June 25th's audio MarketMinute


Central Bankers expect gold to outperform equities, bonds, currencies – and oil

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 09:36 AM PDT

by Rhona O'Connell
ubsFriday, 25 Jun 2010 (Mineweb) — At its recent annual seminar for reserve management, investment bank UBS polled over 80 reserve managers from the official sector as to their views on different reserve assets. One outcome was that gold was expected to be the strongest asset class in the second half of this year, while 22% of those polled thought that gold would be the most important reserve asset over the next 25 years.

This may seem like a long time horizon, but central bankers have to think in the long term as custodians of national wealth (expect, of course, when governments get in the way and insist on, for example, gold disposals with prior publicity). The view underpins the swing in attitudes towards gold in the official sector that has been evolving. Clearly the shifting tides in sentiment are informed by increased concern over fiscal imbalances, currency dislocations and sovereign risk, all of which have escalated over the past eighteen months, and which are therefore helping to change a trend of sales that was most-recently re-established in 1989.

[source]


Central Bankers expect gold to outperform equities, bonds, currencies – and oil

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 09:36 AM PDT

by Rhona O'Connell
ubsFriday, 25 Jun 2010 (Mineweb) — At its recent annual seminar for reserve management, investment bank UBS polled over 80 reserve managers from the official sector as to their views on different reserve assets. One outcome was that gold was expected to be the strongest asset class in the second half of this year, while 22% of those polled thought that gold would be the most important reserve asset over the next 25 years.

This may seem like a long time horizon, but central bankers have to think in the long term as custodians of national wealth (expect, of course, when governments get in the way and insist on, for example, gold disposals with prior publicity). The view underpins the swing in attitudes towards gold in the official sector that has been evolving. Clearly the shifting tides in sentiment are informed by increased concern over fiscal imbalances, currency dislocations and sovereign risk, all of which have escalated over the past eighteen months, and which are therefore helping to change a trend of sales that was most-recently re-established in 1989.

[source]


Now China sources newly mined gold from the U.S.A.

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 09:26 AM PDT

by Lawrence Williams
Friday , 25 Jun 2010 (Mineweb) — We are now used to China sourcing huge volumes of metals from external sources to drive its industrial machine forwards, but the latest announcement from Coeur d'Alene Mines on its deal to have its gold concentrates purchased and processed by China's largest gold producer suggests that precious metals are on China's vast shopping list too.

China is already the world's largest gold miner, and many analysts now assume — following the country's announcement last year that it had been building up its gold reserves for six years unknown to the West – that it is still expanding its gold holdings in a way that does not necessarily show the gold going into official reserves. And now it appears to be looking elsewhere to purchase supplies of the yellow metal without overtly impacting the market.

What is significant, perhaps, is that this suggests that China's commitment to gold is both ongoing – and likely to increase. The country, through its financial institutions and state television advertising, has been persuading its ever growing middle classes to purchase gold (and silver) as a good investment. There seems little doubt that the state is doing the same thing itself as a means of diversifying its huge reserves…

… as my colleague Dorothy Kosich noted in her article today on the company's new Kensington mine in Alaska… "China Gold will be paying upfront, which means that in terms of timing, Coeur will get paid seven days after shipping vs. the typical two-three months that most concentrate producers must wait, while the metal is being processed at the smelter/refinery."

mine…although it covers a relatively small amount of gold for the Chinese — but the very fact that this has been put into place suggests that other similar deals are likely to be negotiated with other new producers going forwards. It also means that China's appetite for gold just cannot be satisfied by its still growing domestic gold mine output — as we noted above already the world's largest…

To buy newly-mined gold production at source is thus a clever ploy. It is not interfering with the gold market directly by being seen to buy, but picking up gold which is actually never reaching the market. It can then move the gold into some interim holding capacity which does not have it showing up in its official reserves until, and unless, it wishes to make this statement to the markets.

[source]


Daily ETF Roundup: VXX Falls, UNG Surges

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 09:23 AM PDT

ETF Database submits:

Equity markets finished flat to end the day, as the Dow finished in the red as the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq both managed to eek out gains. Gold was also flat as the precious metal finished the week at 1,255/oz. However, the big winner on the day was oil, which surged more than $2.55 a barrel to finish the day just above to $79 mark. The flat market was highlighted by a banking overhaul bill which ended up being far less imposing than many had feared. “The bill could have been a lot worse,” said Alan Valdes, vice president at Hilliard Lyons in New York. “It’s a bill we can live with.” [see G-20 Summit, Reform Bill Put Financial ETFs In Focus]


Complete Story »


What's Bearish For Stocks Is Not Be Bearish For All Precious Metals...

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 09:20 AM PDT

In our most recent essay we have emphasized what influence might the general stock market have on the prices of the precious metals. Since the situation appears to be developing in the direction mentioned earlier ... Read More...



Banking Reform Pushing Financials Lower and Silver Higher

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 09:03 AM PDT

Major mining indexes appear to be approaching a major breakout point fueled by the sweeping overhaul and takeover of banks. Banks have been under pressure from a continuing recession, high unemployment, a weak housing market and now ... Read More...



Crisis In Romania: Constitutional Court Votes Pension Cuts Unconstitutional, IMF Loan In Jeopardy, Presidential Palace Stormed, CDS Blows Out

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 09:02 AM PDT


Several days after the Romanian parliament passed a law to cut pensions by 15% in order to qualify for a critical $20 billion IMF loan, the Romanian Supreme Court found this law was not only unconstitutional, but unappealable (along the lines of what our own SCOTUS will do once the Fed's transparency appeal gets to the very top, resulting in confirmation once and for all that American laws are only made for the benefit of the Federal Reserve). The decision was reached hours after dozens of Romanian citizens stormed the presidential palace "to get an audience with President Traian Basescu." As a result of the Constitutional Court's decision, the IMF loan "may now be delayed, and this will be a big blow to the government of Prime Minister Emil Boc, the BBC's Nick Thorpe reports." Also as a result, Romanian (and by association, neighboring Bulgaria) CDS blew up today and closed +30 to 410 for Dracula's host country, and +20 to 360 bps for the country that served as the reverse engineering center of the former Communist Bloc.

From BBC:

A top court in Romania has ruled out a pension cut demanded by the country's government as part of a deficit-cutting financial austerity measure.

The government wanted to cut state pensions by 15%, as well as slashing wages and welfare allowances.

But the Constitutional Court said the pension cut was unconstitutional, a ruling which cannot be appealed.

Romania wants to cut spending to qualify for a $20bn loan from the International Monetary Fund.

That may now be delayed, and this will be a big blow to the government of Prime Minister Emil Boc, the BBC's Nick Thorpe reports.

The court decision came after dozens of people tried to force their way into the presidential palace to get an audience with President Traian Basescu.

Riot police repelled them from the palace.

The court did not publish its reasoning behind the ruling, but unions say pensions partly funded by worker contributions to are protected by the constitution.

Just wait until Greeks get wind of this ruling, and ask the logical question why their own constitution allows their pensions to be cut by as much as 30%. So much for the smooth and glitch-free passage of austerity across all of Europe. Oh, and it is about time, as we have long been claiming, that investors take a long hard look at Eastern European CDS. It is still not too late.


Congress passes "diluted" financial reform bill

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 08:31 AM PDT

From Bloomberg:

Legislation to overhaul financial regulation will help curb risk-taking and boost capital buffers. What it won’t do is fundamentally reshape Wall Street’s biggest banks or prevent another crisis, analysts said.

A deal reached by members of a House and Senate conference early this morning diluted provisions from the tougher Senate bill, limiting rather than prohibiting the ability of federally insured banks to trade derivatives and invest in hedge funds or private equity funds.

Banks “dodged a bullet,” said Raj Date, executive director for Cambridge Winter Inc.’s center for financial institutions policy and a former Deutsche Bank AG executive. “This has to be a net positive.”

Hashed out almost two years after the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, the legislation shepherded by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd and House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank places limits on potentially risky activities such as proprietary trading or over-the-counter derivatives and gives regulators new powers to seize and wind down large, complex institutions if needed.

The overhaul, which still requires approval from the full Congress, won’t shrink banks deemed “too big to fail,” leaving largely intact a U.S. financial industry dominated by six companies with a combined $9.4 trillion of assets. The changes also do little to solve the danger posed by leveraged companies reliant on fickle markets for funding, which can evaporate in a panic like the one that spread in late 2008.

‘Fig Leaf’

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Financials Index, whose 79 companies include JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc., rose 1.4 percent at 1:02 p.m. in New York.

The legislation is “largely a fig leaf,” said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington. “Given where we were when this got started, I’d have to imagine the Wall Street firms are pretty happy.”

Banks avoided drastic curbs on their highly profitable derivatives businesses. Lenders including JPMorgan and Citigroup Inc. will be required to move less than 10 percent of the derivatives in their deposit-taking banks to a broker-dealer division during the next two years, which may require additional capital.

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, which were the two biggest U.S. securities firms before converting to banks in September 2008, won’t be as affected because they kept most of their derivatives in their broker-dealer units.

‘Pennies’ of Dilution

“There’s going to be some adaptation, but I don’t think there’s going to be any colossal impact,” said Benjamin Wallace, an analyst at Grimes & Co. in Westborough, Massachusetts, which manages $900 million and holds stakes in Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan and Wells Fargo & Co. Derivatives rules mean “there’s going to be a capital raise, but the analysis we’ve seen suggests we’re talking in the pennies in terms of dilution” of earnings per share.

Senator Blanche Lincoln, a Democrat from Arkansas, had originally advocated forbidding banks that receive federal support such as deposit insurance from trading swaps, a rule that could have required banks to spin off those businesses.

The final agreement provides a number of exemptions: Banks can continue trading derivatives used to hedge their risks and can keep trading interest-rate and foreign-exchange contracts. Banks will have up to two years to move other types of derivatives, such as credit default swaps that aren’t standard enough to be cleared through a central counterparty, into a separately capitalized subsidiary.

97% of Market

U.S. commercial banks held derivatives with a notional value of $216.5 trillion in the first quarter, of which 92 percent were interest-rate or foreign-exchange derivatives, according to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The five U.S. banks with the biggest holdings of derivatives -- JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo -- hold $209 trillion, or 97 percent of the total, the OCC said.

The rules are “nowhere as bad as what the banks might have feared as recently as a week ago,” Bill Winters, the London- based former co-chief executive officer of JPMorgan’s investment bank, told Bloomberg Television today. “Banks have pretty much factored in already the idea that most derivatives will have to be cleared through a central clearing counterparty. Not a huge surprise and probably not a huge cost either.”

Volcker Rule

Derivatives are contracts whose value is derived from stocks, bonds, loans, currencies and commodities, or linked to specific events such as changes in interest rates or weather. They include credit-default swaps, which act like insurance for investors in case a debt issuer can’t repay.

Swaps sold by American International Group Inc. that later went sour helped push the insurer to the brink of bankruptcy and triggered a $182 billion federal bailout of the New York-based company during the near collapse of the financial system in 2008.

Another portion of the legislation that was amended in the final conference was the so-called Volcker rule, named after Paul Volcker, the former Federal Reserve chairman who championed it. Originally the rule would have prevented any systemically important bank holding company from engaging in proprietary trading, or bets with its own money, as well as investing its own capital in hedge funds or private-equity funds. Goldman Sachs executives have estimated that about 10 percent of the firm’s annual revenue comes from proprietary trading.

3% Rule

In the final version, the banks will be allowed to provide no more than 3 percent of a fund’s equity, and will be limited to investing up to 3 percent of the bank’s Tier 1 capital in hedge funds or private equity funds. That represents a ceiling of about $3.9 billion for JPMorgan, $3.6 billion for Citigroup and $2.1 billion for Goldman Sachs, according to the companies’ latest quarterly reports.

“I don’t think it will have any impact at all on most banks,” Winters said of the amended Volcker rule. “It’s a pragmatic solution that will result in the banks having no big issues.”

While the rule has been watered down, it still represents an important change in direction for a financial industry that had been allocating a larger and larger portion of capital over the last decade to making bets and investments with their own money, said James Ellman, president of San Francisco-based hedge fund Seacliff Capital LLC, which specializes in financial industry stocks.

‘Casino’ Must Go

“You’re going to be taking out of the banks areas of investing that every 10 years or so, at certain points in the cycle, tend to have dramatic losses,” Ellman said. “Effectively you’re telling the system: We have to take the casino out of the utility.”

While Ellman said the legislation will help to make the financial system safer, he added that “it won’t satisfy anybody who wanted really strict additional regulation of banks.”

The new version of the Volcker rule also incorporates changes proposed by Democratic Senators Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Carl Levin of Michigan that aim to curb conflicts of interest by preventing firms that underwrite an asset-backed security from placing bets against the investment. In April, Levin presided over a hearing in which Goldman Sachs executives were accused of betting against some of the same collateralized debt obligations that they underwrote; the executives responded by saying they were acting as market-makers.

Market-Based Funding

While requirements for an increase in capital will provide banks with a bigger cushion to absorb losses, the legislation does little to reduce banks’ dependence on the markets to finance their balance sheets. It was that market-based funding that made firms like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley vulnerable to the panic that spread in 2008.

“Something has to be put in place to cause banks to have deposit-based liabilities and not market-based liabilities,” Grimes & Co.’s Wallace said.

The effects of the legislation won’t be seen for several years as new regulations are drafted and implemented, analysts said. New international capital requirements under consideration by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which could be implemented by the end of 2011, will also be important.

Investors and analysts including Optique Capital Management’s William Fitzpatrick said bank stock prices have already factored in any likely reduction in revenue from the changes.

“Profitability is indeed going to take a hit and we’re going to see more stringent capital requirements,” said Fitzpatrick at Milwaukee-based Optique, which oversees about $800 million including stock in Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. “The changes are most certainly necessary. They can certainly lead to a more stable and predictable earnings stream.”

Still, he added, “this doesn’t remove all of the elements of financial distress that could lead to some of the challenges we had in 2008.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Christine Harper in New York at charper@bloomberg.net.

More government stupidity:

This will be the cause of the 2011 economic collapse

Porter Stansberry: This is the biggest threat to your financial future

OUTRAGE: Fannie and Freddie could need another $1 trillion taxpayer bailout


Bove: Wall Street Wins, Main Street Loses

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 08:29 AM PDT

Bank analyst Dick Bove of Rochdale Securities doesn't think Wall Street will have any trouble "innovating around" the financial market reforms that the House and Senate agreed to earlier today and that Main Street will again end up the loser because, however much money the reforms cost the banks, they can get that money back by raising fees.

Bove says the reforms "will not stop any financial crisis in the future … So, this is a populist surge of activity to say 'hey, we're going to get those bad guys on Wall Street who did all those bad things to you'. But, in terms of who get's hurt, it is definitely not the banking industry, it is definitely the U.S. economy, the U.S. consumer…"


Gold's Rise And The Dow's Fate

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 08:18 AM PDT

It is important to keep the big picture in mind. When one only focuses on the day to day movements of the gold price, one will be one of those who will lose out. At this point, where gold is going parabolic, you could sell all, and a week later ... Read More...



EUR Shorts Return, As Commercial Gold Net Short Positions Hit All Time Record

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 08:09 AM PDT


A week after the EUR posted the biggest short covering rally in history, expunging every single weak hand after a move wiped out 44% of all net shorts, the bearish speculative bets on the EUR are once again rising, according to just released CFTC Commitment of Traders data. After dropping from net -111,945 to just -62,360 contracts in the past week, net non-commercial EUR shorts are once again rising, and have increased by 8,614 in the week ended June 22, to -70,974. The easy short covering is over: at this point shakeouts, as claimed last week, will require something much more effective than a Goldman downgrade of the EURUSD.

In other COT news, gold fans will be happy to know that the number of commercial gross and net short positions in the precious metal has hit a new all time record of 475,678 gross and 288.916 net shorts. It is getting increasingly more expensive to the commercial players to preserve the price of gold at current levels, even with unlimited paper shorting capacity. As ETF's such as GLD accumulate increasingly more (hopefully real) gold inventory (yesterday's record number of 1,316 tonnes in GLD has not be updated for today yet), it will, in turn, become increasingly more difficult to push down gold price even as all the big players try to gold paper gold down.


Shocking figures show California gov't workers are making unbelievably high salaries

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 08:05 AM PDT

From Tom Dyson in The 12% Letter:

This is shocking...

In California, you can look up the salary of any government employee. California considers this public information. I looked up police officer salaries in the city of Oakland using the San Jose Mercury's database search. (Hat tip to J.D. Rosendahl and his excellent blog at http://www.roseysoutlook.blogspot.com.)

The police department has 1,149 employees on the payroll. Of these, 648 police officers receive more than $100,000 in pay. You'd expect the chiefs, lieutenants, and captains to make the most money. Not in Oakland. The four highest-paid officers in the Oakland Police Department are regular police officers, each making more than $227,000 in 2009. The amazing thing is, these four police officers all made more than $100,000 in overtime.

Meanwhile, the City of Oakland spends almost $50 million more than it receives each year in taxes, plus it owes another $43 million to the police and fire retirement system. Oakland must be close to bankruptcy.

You can draw a couple of conclusions from these statistics. One, to close the gap, Oakland will have to crank up taxes. Two, it'll have to cut back its services and fire a load of police and firemen.

Even during the years when they earned the biggest revenues, most California municipalities were unable to keep balanced budgets. Now that property prices have collapsed, all the other big cities and counties in California must be in similar financial straits as the City of Oakland.

This doesn't really matter to 12% Letter readers, because we're not lending any money or buying any municipal bonds from California. With higher taxes and less government spending, California's economy is going to continue struggling.

Crux Note: Tom Dyson is editor of The 12% Letter, and he's found some incredible ways for readers to earn big income today that have nothing to do with risky high-yield stocks or shaky muni bonds. To learn more, click here.

More from Tom Dyson:

Tom Dyson: The world is on the verge of a historic collapse

Tom Dyson: Most investments will crash for the next year or two

Income expert: The simplest way to earn safe interest on your money


Bending to the Modern World

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 08:05 AM PDT

J.P. Morgan rose to influence in an era when the accumulation of great wealth began to astound the ordinary man.

As Nassim Nicholas Taleb observed in his book, The Black Swan, life is unfair, a theme the economist Sherwin Rosen, author of studies about the economics of superstars, develops as credited by Taleb.

Rosen bemoans the high salaries of basketball stars and TV personalities, which he attributes to the "tournament effect," wherein someone who is marginally better can win the whole pot, leaving others with nothing. Taleb reminds us how this is so: We would rather buy a recording featuring the renowned Vladimir Horowitz for $10.99 than pay $9.99 for one of a struggling pianist.

However, ordinary men through democracy can band together to not only ostracize the J.P. Morgans from the village, but to strip them of tournament winnings.

Just as important, they can redistribute them to those who struggle in the $9.99 bin. On the other hand, in the world of credit, democracy is a stranger. Should the rules be short circuited, wealth need not participate.

Share prices for implicitly government-backed mortgage agencies can plunge from $60 to less than $1 in months. The Soviet Union learned this the hard way.

Europe's unemployment rate during the boom times prior to 2008 stood at its 1932 depression level, its countries having not created more than a few million jobs in the last three decades. Yet somehow many think its system is still functioning relatively well.

By 1913, when J.P. Morgan appeared in the Pujo hearings, the era of lending money based upon character was beginning to have this determinant completely removed from the process, and the pendulum would shift 100 years later toward the ordinary man collectively mandating loans for everyone, eventually without even documentation or down payment.

Or worse, smothering documentation would lend an air of legitimacy. Loans would be sliced and diced for general consumption, surrounded by the safety of telephone-book-sized prospectuses, overseen by thousands of regulations, and monitored by intricate risk models, none of which could put Humpty Dumpty back together.

In the era leading up to Morgan, when character was put foremost, America had seen small percentages of banks fail in great panics, only to have most of their assets recover in value when liquidity returned.

Now, thanks to modern practices, great numbers of giant-sized financial institutions have essentially failed. They must be kept on life support; because their assets are so tainted they may never recover in value.

Regards,

Bill Baker,
for The Daily Reckoning

[Editor's note: This passage is reprinted from William W. Baker's book, Endless Money: The Moral Hazards of Socialism, with the permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc (©2010). You can get your own copy here.]

Bending to the Modern World originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today's markets. Its been called "the most entertaining read of the day."


Lawrence Williams: Is China manipulating gold UP?

Posted: 25 Jun 2010 07:58 AM PDT

4:02p ET Friday, June 25, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

MineWeb's Lawrence Williams today has posted excellent and incisive commentary about China's agreement to buy gold concentrates from a Coeur d'Alene mine in Alaska, seeing it as evidence that China cannot obtain all the gold it wants from domestic production and wants to build its gold reserves without the market-exploding publicity that might result from buying gold from the International Monetary Fund.

But Williams concludes with a puzzling reference to GATA: "The move has to be seen as long-term bullish for the gold price and is yet another way of limiting downside risk for gold investors. GATA has for a long time been railing against what it sees as gold price suppression by the gold banks and governments, but probably none of this has the potential impact for control of the gold market which can be and probably is being exerted by the Chinese. But because this is broadly positive for gold it may not be in that organisation's interests to comment. Yet it is an equally manipulative policy if indeed it is in effect!"

In the context of its work, GATA would define "manipulative" as involving interference against a free market -- like the coordinated dishoarding of gold by central banks at strategic moments to knock gold's price down, or the sale of more promises of gold than can realistically be delivered or more gold than even exists. GATA has documented this sort of market manipulation:

http://www.gata.org/taxonomy/term/21

Is it "manipulative" for a buyer to try to arrange his buying so it doesn't proclaim the danger of shortages and invite front-running by other buyers? Not in the sense of what GATA has complained about. As Williams notes, China's careful acquisition of gold is hugely bullish for the long term and spells doom for the Western central bank gold price suppression scheme -- eventually, when China thinks it has adequately hedged its huge dollar reserve exposure, but not necessarily soon. But if China means to get all the gold it can and has decided to stagger its purchases to minimize their market impact, such a policy just as easily can be said to be manipulatively suppressive.

In any case China's gold policy seems somewhat more transparent than that of the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve, whose determined secrecy in gold matters probably secures for them for all time the prize for gold market manipulation.

Williams' commentary is headlined "Now China Sources Newly Mined Gold from the USA" and you can find it at MineWeb here:

http://www.mineweb.co.za/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page33?oid=106850&sn=De...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy to Become Coal Producer This Year
with 1.5 Billion Tonnes of Resource

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX.V: PCY) announced on May 11 that it has entered into a mine services agreement with Leighton Asia Ltd. to begin coal production this year. Production will begin with a 250,000-tonne starter pit as planned in August, with production advancing to 2 million tonnes per year in 2011. Prophecy is fully funded to production and its management team includes John Morganti, Arnold Armstrong, and Rob McEwen.

For Prophecy's complete press release about its production plans, please visit:

http://www.prophecyresource.com/news_2010_may11.php



Join GATA here:

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 27-30, 2010
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
http://www.neworleansconference.com/index.html

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16


No comments:

Post a Comment