A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Gold World News Flash

Gold World News Flash


International Forecaster July 2010 (#3) - Gold, Silver, Economy + More

Posted: 11 Jul 2010 04:30 AM PDT

Markets in Europe will return to their historical tribal roots and live naturally. Most countries will be far more prepared to enter a new free market and be comfortable doing so. This would include decentralization and diversity. Getting rid of the euro and the EU will be the best thing in years that has happened to European countries. Needless to say, this won't go over very well with the New World Order crowd. They will again have been unsuccessful.


Save the Virgins!

Posted: 11 Jul 2010 04:09 AM PDT

Most prevalent among the modern belief systems is that shamans of government and high finance can, by virtue of their Harvard degrees and clearly advanced intellects, effectively manage large economies. The fallacy in this notion should be evident to everyone – here in the U.S., it's as simple as noting how everyone from the Fed chairman to almost all of the nation's political leaders and the best and brightest on Wall Street failed to anticipate the current crisis. Any way you slice it, the lot of them were caught as flatfooted as the crew and passengers on the last voyage of the Morro Castle.


Irrational Gold Selling

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 10:00 PM PDT

Last Monday I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw that the price of gold had dropped $44.20, which was weird enough since Kitco was showing the "Gold Price Change due to Weakening dollar" was up by $23.00, meaning gold should be going up thanks to the weakening dollar, while the "Gold Price Change due to Predominant Selling" was down a whopping $67.20! Wow! Selling!


Jim?s Mailbox

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:50 PM PDT

View the original post at jsmineset.com... July 10, 2010 01:54 PM Bullish Money Flows in Gold CIGA Eric Targeted, fearful headlines, intended to create an emotional response in gold, continue to hide inflows (outflow of short) into weakness from connected players. The operation is coordinated and professional. Gold London P.M Fixed and the Commercial Traders COT Futures and Options Stochastic Weighted Average of Net Long As A % of Open Interest While connected players setup for the next advance, they do so while retail money is clearly on the wrong side of the trade (short). Gold London P.M Fixed and the Nonreportable Traders COT Futures and Options Stochastic Weighted Average of Net Long As A % of Open Interest Are you ready for the unexpected? More…...


Daily Dispatch: Weekend Edition - July 10, 2010

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:50 PM PDT

July 10, 2010 | www.CaseyResearch.com Weekend Edition Dear Reader, Welcome to the weekend edition of Casey's Daily Dispatch, a compilation of our favorite stories from the week for the time-stressed readers. Of course, if you want to read all of the Daily Dispatches from the week, you may do so in the archives at CaseyResearch.com. [B]I Smell a VAT[/B] In past editions of this service, I’ve advocated tuning your personal radar to pick up early indications that the government is taking an active interest in gold. Especially when that interest revolves around terrorists or tax evaders, two popular bogeymen these days. It was, therefore, with more than a little concern that I read an article in our Ed Steer’s Gold & Silver Daily service yesterday on an item slid into the legislation authorizing the government takeover of health care. Here’s a snip from Ed’s letter… [LIST] [*]The...


Q & a

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:50 PM PDT

The following is automatically syndicated from Grandich's blog. You can view the original post here. Stay up to date on his model portfolio! July 10, 2010 02:34 PM Please don’t send anymore questions until the next time we do this. Question - Hi Peter, Glad you are doing this. My question has to do with your last post; if you own gold and the Lonnie, you can sleep well a night. Well thanks to you I own gold and thanks to my birth place, I get paid in loonies. My question is; does it make sense to trade my loonies in for gold when they may appreciate just as much or more when measured against other currencies? How would you*invest if you*were paid in*loonies? Thanks, CJ, Saskatoon,Sk. Canada Answer- You still have the risk of gold going lower versus higher. While gold is no longer "cheap" in my book it still has another 75% -100% upside potential. I think the Loonie has 10%-15% upside potential and nil to the downside versus its terminally ill neighbor south of the border ...


The Fed and the IMF say: "Print... or Die!"

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:50 PM PDT

Gold pretty much traded sideways during the Far East session... with the gold's low of the day... such as it was... occurring shortly before 10:00 a.m. Hong Kong time on Friday morning... which translates into shortly before 9:00 p.m. Thursday evening in New York. Once the London a.m. gold fix was in [10:30 a.m. Friday morning] at the close of Hong Kong trading [6:30 p.m. Friday night]... gold was on the move upwards. And, once New York opened, there were several attempts at an up-side breakout... with the first occurring at precisely 9:00 a.m. Eastern. This met with huge selling... as did every subsequent rally attempt from there. Gold's high price for the day [$1,214.80 spot] appeared to be set at the vertical price spike that occurred at 10:20 a.m. Eastern time... shortly after the London p.m. gold fix was in for the day. Although that time could have been the fix itself. Gold volume was pretty decent... around 110,000 contracts net of everything. ...


John Embry: U.S. dollar's collapse inevitable

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:50 PM PDT

Sprott Asset Management's chief investment strategist, John Embry, writes for Investor's Digest of Canada that collapse of the U.S. dollar is almost inevitable and gold is about to reassert itself as money in a shocking way. The headline on Embry's commentary is "U.S. Dollar's Collapse Inevitable" and you can find it at the Sprott Asset Management Internet site here: http://www.sprott.com/Docs/InvestorsDigest/2010/MPLID_062510_pg204Emb.pd... ...


Oh Canada!

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:50 PM PDT

The following is automatically syndicated from Grandich's blog. You can view the original post here. Stay up to date on his model portfolio! July 10, 2010 04:47 AM The one country in the western world I remain bullish on is Canada. While the rest of the western world did many things wrong, Canada did much right. I would own gold and the Loonie if i wanted to sleep good. Oh Canada! [url]http://www.grandich.com/[/url] grandich.com...


Commodities Week: Oil and Copper Rise, Natural Gas Falls, Gold Unchanged

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:08 PM PDT

Sumit Roy submits:
Energy

Crude oil rose 4% this past week, as the commodity took its cues from rebounding equity markets. A fairly uneventful economic calendar allowed for a bit of optimism, with some traders speculating that any potential economic slowdown had already been priced in. Peak-to-trough, the S&P 500 fell nearly 17%, while oil fell 26.3% using the May 20th low and 18.4% using the more recent low put in this Tuesday.
Another disappointing ISM figure, this time measuring the service sector, was released on Tuesday. The Index fell from 55.4 to 53.8 in June, which was below the 55 analyst consensus. Though oil and equities attempted to rally in spite of the poor reading, they gave up much of their gains by the end of the session. Indeed, oil settled slightly to the downside. Not to be discouraged, bargain hunters reentered the markets on Wednesday, with a lack of news enabling them to carry markets higher uninterrupted. The positive momentum carried into Thursday’s session, aided by a drop in initial U.S. jobless claims which fell to 454,000 from 475,000 in the prior week.

The DOE crude oil inventory data was also released on Thursday, a day later than usual due to the 4th of July holiday. The government reported that in the week ending July 2, 2010, U.S. crude oil inventories decreased by 5 million barrels, gasoline inventories increased by 1.3 million barrels, distillate inventories increased 0.3 million barrels, and total petroleum inventories increased 0.4 million barrels. While the storage figures look bullish on the surface, they are very much in line with the 5-year average. Moreover, approximately 1.4 million barrels of production was shut-in last week due to Hurricane Alex; adjusting for the storm impact yields a 3.6 million barrel crude oil draw and 1.7 million barrels total petroleum build— figures which are slightly more bearish than the 5-year average.


Complete Story »


Nature's Golden Standard Is Back

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:08 PM PDT

Katy Delay submits:

The news about gold swaps on the back pages of the Bank of International Settlements report made a few waves last week. Some immediately reacted in shock, claiming this is potential bad news for gold bugs because it augurs a future glut of gold supply on the market if and when the swaps fall through.

But this is not potential bad news for gold bugs, only for gold speculators. Because I am a gold bug, when I heard the news my immediate reaction was, "Hey, this is great. Some financial entity out there got so desperate that they had to use their gold as collateral. It's probably a large European bank or even a central bank, and this may not be the last time it happens. Gold is definitely coming back into style."


Complete Story »


Double Top for GLD?

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:07 PM PDT

Aigail Doolittle submits:

Taking a look at the dollar, you know, it’s funny, but charts really never do lie.

One month ago when the dollar index was close to $88, I wrote,


Complete Story »


Is gold price manipulation becoming a respectable topic?

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:00 PM PDT



7 Reasons Why the Euro Is Rallying

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 06:28 PM PDT

Andrei Tratseuski submits:

Since early-mid June, the euro has been in a fairly aggressive uptrend, after nearly six months of losses. Here are seven reasons why:

  1. Sovereign debt in Europe is no longer a problem. Investors believe that the PIIGS are no longer in extremely volatile states. The reason: backing provided by the IMF and the Union itself.
  2. Credit Default Swaps started to narrow between weaker nations and ever important German Treasuries. The following presents a good scenario for the weaker nations as financing their debt becomes easier.
  3. Markets have turned from sovereign debt issues in Europe to weaker data in the United States. Naysayers believe that the stimulus inflated economy will no longer perform at an appropriate rate. Double dip recession thoughts are in the air.
  4. Spain had a very successful bond offering, which calmed down the markets.
  5. Short squeezing of futures and spot of Euro. IMM data still shows a negative net short of 73,670 futures contracts in the Euro, which will eventually be covered.
  6. Tight liquidity in the Euro-zone banks is beginning to wane. Banks are able to get funded almost without a problem.
  7. Stress tests for Euro banks. If you recall, stress tests of banks in the United States were among one of thee catalysts which rekindled confidence in the markets and slowly pushed the economy out of recession.

Disclosure: No Positions


Complete Story »


Video: Is Gold About To Rocket and SP500 Tank?

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 06:20 PM PDT

Last week we saw stocks move sharply higher as traders started to cover their short position which added fuel to an already oversold market ready to bounce. Overall volume was not that strong on the move up which is a bearish sign. On Friday afternoon we saw the SP500 continue to move into the $1075 resistance level on very light volume. This indicates to me that buyers are not willing to pay these higher prices because the market has moved up so quickly and the fact that it's trading at a resistance level.

I feel the market will gap higher on Monday just like we say on June 20/21 deep into a resistance level and the big money will short the pop sending it sharply lower.

Gold looks to be shifting its momentum from a down trend to an uptrend. It's forming a reverse head & shoulders pattern which is shown in the video posted below.

Here is My Technical Trading Report Video Covering:

- Gold
– US Dollar
– SP500
– Market Internals
– On Balance Volume

iPhone/iPad Video Format: Click Here

Weekend Conclusion:

In short is looks as thought the market is at a critical pivot point. We could see prices stall out here and continue the down trend or see strong buying step in sending prices higher in the equities market. We need to wait and see what type of price action unfolds in the coming days.

If you would like to receive my trading alerts and education checkout my service at www.FuturesTradingSignals.com or my swing trading service at www.TheGoldAndOilGuy.com

Chris Vermeulen


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

This Past Week in Gold

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 06:16 PM PDT

www.simplyprofits.org


GLD – on sell signal.
SLV – on sell signal.
GDX – on sell signal.
XGD.TO – on sell signal.

Summary
Long term – on major buy signal.
Short term – on sell signals.
We continue to hold our core positions, and wait for new signals and set ups.

Disclosure
We do not offer predictions or forecasts for the markets. What you see here is our simple trading model which provides us the signals and set ups to be either long, short, or in cash at any given time. Entry points and stops are provided in real time to subscribers, therefore, this update may not reflect our current positions in the markets. Trade at your own discretion.
We also provide coverage to the major indexes and oil sector.


FT's Lex on gold and the BIS: Nothing to see here

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 05:38 PM PDT

1:32a ET Sunday, July 11, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Last week's pseudonymous "Lex" column in the Financial Times about the recent strange and hidden gold swaps undertaken by the Bank for International Settlements was typical FT -- high-falutin' dismissiveness about gold that avoided any original research, avoided even seeking on-the-record comment from the source, the BIS itself.

How does the BIS explain the transaction? Why was it hidden in a footnote in the bank's annual report rather than announced generally? Since commercial banks are not known for maintaining large gold reserves such as those in these swaps, where and how did the commercial banks get the gold? Were the commercial banks fronting somehow for central banks? What's really going on here?

Though the failure of the BIS to announce the transaction demonstrated an intent to hide it, Lex and the FT won't ask about it. Rather than investigate, Lex and the FT have lined up in front of the story to shoo curious onlookers away, much like the bumbling detective played by Leslie Nielsen in the fireworks factory scene in the movie "The Naked Gun":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSjK2Oqrgic

When it comes to gold and central banking, the FT seems to see its job as being not so much to report the news as to suppress it.

The "Lex" column, headlined "The Gold and the BIS," is appended. Now move along. Nothing to see here.

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

* * *

Gold and the BIS

By Lex
Financial Times, London
Wednesday, July 7, 2010

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3/27c110da-89a3-11df-9ea6-00144feab49a.html

What to make of the news that the central banks' central bank is sitting on 346 tonnes of gold?

It is held via gold swaps between the Bank for International Settlements and European commercial banks that have collateralised loans with ingots. Such operations had been rare in recent years but took off in earnest just as the Greek sovereign debt crisis erupted -- so the news, contained in a note to the BIS' annual report, unleashed numerous conspiracy theories.

Traders theorised that one or more of the bloc's central banks pawned gold to prop up their groaning banking systems. Spain's regional savings banks, or cajas, and Greek lenders, for example, have sucked in copious liquidity in recent months and are likely to need more.

These transactions bore all the hallmarks of a furtive operation to assist a peripheral eurozone central bank unwilling to be seen pawning its reserves. But the swaps raised only $14 billion -- surely not enough for any such sweeping operations.

Another tale was that the central banks used swaps for bridging finance pending drawdown of the eurozone rescue package; but again, the numbers fail to stack up.

An even more far-fetched explanation has the International Monetary Fund selling reserves to boost its own finances ahead of a bailout.

The reality is almost certainly more prosaic, having more to do with the technicalities of the collateralised lending market than with the entry of a big new player. But the far-fetched theories still had a real-world consequence and put the skids under gold: prices slid back to late-May levels on the news.

Ironic, really, since it is jitters about the eurozone debt crisis that had fuelled the precious metal's fabulous rise -- up 15 per cent from the start of the year to a nominal high of about $1,265 a troy ounce two weeks ago.



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy to Become Coal Producer This Year
with 1.5 Billion Tonnes of Resource

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX.V: PCY) announced on May 11 that it has entered into a mine services agreement with Leighton Asia Ltd. to begin coal production this year. Production will begin with a 250,000-tonne starter pit as planned in August, with production advancing to 2 million tonnes per year in 2011. Prophecy is fully funded to production and its management team includes John Morganti, Arnold Armstrong, and Rob McEwen.

For Prophecy's complete press release about its production plans, please visit:

http://www.prophecyresource.com/news_2010_may11.php



Join GATA here:

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 27-30, 2010
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
http://www.neworleansconference.com/redirect.php?page=index.html&source_...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Sona Resources Expects Positive Cash Flow from Blackdome,
Plans Aggressive Exploration of Elizabeth Gold Property

On May 18, 2010, Sona Resources Corp. (TSXV: SYS, Frankfurt: QS7) announced the release of a preliminary economic assessment for gold production at its flagship Blackdome and Elizabeth properties in British Columbia.

Sona Executive Chairman Nick Ferris says: "We view this as a baseline scenario for gold production. The project is highly sensitive to the price of gold. A conservative valuation of gold at $1,093 per ounce would result in a pre-tax cash flow of $54 million. The assessment indicates that underground mining at the two sites would recover 183,600 ounces of gold and 62,500 ounces of silver. Permitting and infrastructure are already in place for processing ore at the Blackdome mill, with a 200-tonne per day throughput over an eight-year mine life. Our near-term goal is to continue aggressive exploration at Elizabeth and develop a million-plus-ounce gold resource, commencing production in 2013."

For complete information on Sona Resources Corp. please visit: www.SonaResources.com

A Canadian gold opportunity ready for growth



FT's Lex on gold and the BIS: Nothing to see here

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 05:38 PM PDT

1:32a ET Sunday, July 11, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Last week's pseudonymous "Lex" column in the Financial Times about the recent strange and hidden gold swaps undertaken by the Bank for International Settlements was typical FT -- high-falutin' dismissiveness about gold that avoided any original research, avoided even seeking on-the-record comment from the source, the BIS itself.

How does the BIS explain the transaction? Why was it hidden in a footnote in the bank's annual report rather than announced generally? Since commercial banks are not known for maintaining large gold reserves such as those in these swaps, where and how did the commercial banks get the gold? Were the commercial banks fronting somehow for central banks? What's really going on here?

Though the failure of the BIS to announce the transaction demonstrated an intent to hide it, Lex and the FT won't ask about it. Rather than investigate, Lex and the FT have lined up in front of the story to shoo curious onlookers away, much like the bumbling detective played by Leslie Nielsen in the fireworks factory scene in the movie "The Naked Gun":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSjK2Oqrgic

When it comes to gold and central banking, the FT seems to see its job as being not so much to report the news as to suppress it.

The "Lex" column, headlined "The Gold and the BIS," is appended. Now move along. Nothing to see here.

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

* * *

Gold and the BIS

By Lex
Financial Times, London
Wednesday, July 7, 2010

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3/27c110da-89a3-11df-9ea6-00144feab49a.html

What to make of the news that the central banks' central bank is sitting on 346 tonnes of gold?

It is held via gold swaps between the Bank for International Settlements and European commercial banks that have collateralised loans with ingots. Such operations had been rare in recent years but took off in earnest just as the Greek sovereign debt crisis erupted -- so the news, contained in a note to the BIS' annual report, unleashed numerous conspiracy theories.

Traders theorised that one or more of the bloc's central banks pawned gold to prop up their groaning banking systems. Spain's regional savings banks, or cajas, and Greek lenders, for example, have sucked in copious liquidity in recent months and are likely to need more.

These transactions bore all the hallmarks of a furtive operation to assist a peripheral eurozone central bank unwilling to be seen pawning its reserves. But the swaps raised only $14 billion -- surely not enough for any such sweeping operations.

Another tale was that the central banks used swaps for bridging finance pending drawdown of the eurozone rescue package; but again, the numbers fail to stack up.

An even more far-fetched explanation has the International Monetary Fund selling reserves to boost its own finances ahead of a bailout.

The reality is almost certainly more prosaic, having more to do with the technicalities of the collateralised lending market than with the entry of a big new player. But the far-fetched theories still had a real-world consequence and put the skids under gold: prices slid back to late-May levels on the news.

Ironic, really, since it is jitters about the eurozone debt crisis that had fuelled the precious metal's fabulous rise -- up 15 per cent from the start of the year to a nominal high of about $1,265 a troy ounce two weeks ago.



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy to Become Coal Producer This Year
with 1.5 Billion Tonnes of Resource

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX.V: PCY) announced on May 11 that it has entered into a mine services agreement with Leighton Asia Ltd. to begin coal production this year. Production will begin with a 250,000-tonne starter pit as planned in August, with production advancing to 2 million tonnes per year in 2011. Prophecy is fully funded to production and its management team includes John Morganti, Arnold Armstrong, and Rob McEwen.

For Prophecy's complete press release about its production plans, please visit:

http://www.prophecyresource.com/news_2010_may11.php



Join GATA here:

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 27-30, 2010
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
http://www.neworleansconference.com/redirect.php?page=index.html&source_...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Sona Resources Expects Positive Cash Flow from Blackdome,
Plans Aggressive Exploration of Elizabeth Gold Property

On May 18, 2010, Sona Resources Corp. (TSXV: SYS, Frankfurt: QS7) announced the release of a preliminary economic assessment for gold production at its flagship Blackdome and Elizabeth properties in British Columbia.

Sona Executive Chairman Nick Ferris says: "We view this as a baseline scenario for gold production. The project is highly sensitive to the price of gold. A conservative valuation of gold at $1,093 per ounce would result in a pre-tax cash flow of $54 million. The assessment indicates that underground mining at the two sites would recover 183,600 ounces of gold and 62,500 ounces of silver. Permitting and infrastructure are already in place for processing ore at the Blackdome mill, with a 200-tonne per day throughput over an eight-year mine life. Our near-term goal is to continue aggressive exploration at Elizabeth and develop a million-plus-ounce gold resource, commencing production in 2013."

For complete information on Sona Resources Corp. please visit: www.SonaResources.com

A Canadian gold opportunity ready for growth




Historical Context: U.S. Oil Production and the Gulf of Mexico

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 05:37 PM PDT

Thoughts on The Rich Strategically Defaulting and the Merits of Mortgage Cramdowns

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 05:29 PM PDT

Rortybomb submits:

The New York Times had an article on Biggest Defaulters on Mortgages Are the Rich with the above graph (click to enlarge). Yves Smith, Annie Lowrey and Tim Fernholz have more.


Complete Story »


Shrimp Fisherman Exposed To BP Spill Bleeding From The Rectum

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 05:03 PM PDT

Shrimpers who were exposed to a mixture of oil and Corexit dispersant in the Gulf of Mexico suffered severe symptoms such as muscle spasms, heart palpitations, headaches that last for weeks and bleeding from the rectum, according to a marine toxicologist who issued the warning Friday on a cable news network.
Dr. Susan Shaw, founder and director of the Marine Environmental Research Institute, said during a CNN broadcast that after personally diving the oil spill in late May, a "very fiery sore throat" plagued her from inhaling fumes coming off the water. Because she was covered from head to toe in a protective suit, Dr. Shaw was spared direct exposure.
Shrimpers who had bare-skin contact with the mixture of oil and Corexit, she said, were not so lucky.
During her segment with anchor Rick Sanchez, Dr. Shaw specified that stories shrimpers had told her were from when BP was deploying "the more toxic" Corexit 9527. BP has allegedly switched to Corexit 9500, which Dr. Shaw has also taken to task in a widely-publicized essay.
More Here..


Hedge funds look for a golden edge

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 05:01 PM PDT

By Sam Jones and Jack Farchy
Financial Times, London
Friday, July 9 2010 19:10

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f1b2691e-8b80-11df-ab4d-00144feab49a.html

Not so long ago hedge funds would send their most junior analysts to the seminars that bullion bankers hosted.

Gold, for much of the past two decades, was the ultimate dreary asset -- of interest only to central bankers and miners.

Now those same bankers are struggling to find time in their diaries to fit in many of the hedge fund industry's biggest players.

In mid-town New York funds that employ barely 100 staff are finding themselves with gold holdings larger than those of some developed nations.

... Dispatch continues below ...



ADVERTISEMENT

Sona Resources Expects Positive Cash Flow from Blackdome,
Plans Aggressive Exploration of Elizabeth Gold Property

On May 18, 2010, Sona Resources Corp. (TSXV: SYS, Frankfurt: QS7) announced the release of a preliminary economic assessment for gold production at its flagship Blackdome and Elizabeth properties in British Columbia.

Sona Executive Chairman Nick Ferris says: "We view this as a baseline scenario for gold production. The project is highly sensitive to the price of gold. A conservative valuation of gold at $1,093 per ounce would result in a pre-tax cash flow of $54 million. The assessment indicates that underground mining at the two sites would recover 183,600 ounces of gold and 62,500 ounces of silver. Permitting and infrastructure are already in place for processing ore at the Blackdome mill, with a 200-tonne per day throughput over an eight-year mine life. Our near-term goal is to continue aggressive exploration at Elizabeth and develop a million-plus-ounce gold resource, commencing production in 2013."

For complete information on Sona Resources Corp. please visit: www.SonaResources.com

A Canadian gold opportunity ready for growth



Paulson & Co., one of the world's most successful hedge fund managers, denominates a third of its $33 billion of assets under management in a share class bolstered by huge positions in the gold market.

In fact, gold is the firm's largest single position. The $3.4 billion stake in the SPDR Gold Trust, a listed US instrument backed by physical gold, equates to a greater tonnage of the metal than Australia holds.

The reason for this is simple. Amid fears that the global economy could be heading for a double-dip recession -- and as financial markets continue to gyrate -- some hedge managers are becoming increasingly bullish about the precious metal. They are drawn to gold's traditional status as a store of value in crises.

Paulson & Co. is the largest hedge fund to back gold, but others including Soros Fund Management, Tudor Investment Corp., Greenlight Capital, and Third Point, are now converts.

"I have never been a gold bug," Paul Tudor Jones, founder and chairman of Tudor Investment, wrote last year. "It is just an asset that, like everything else in life, has its time and place. And now is that time."

The consensus view among the funds is that the price of gold -- trading at around $1,200 an ounce -- will rise to well above $1,500 before it suffers any sizeable correction.

This expectation of further prices rises (gold has increased four-fold since 2002) is based in part on the view that bullion provides a hedge against a rise in inflation.

Some fund managers believe a sharp jump in inflation is unavoidable as a result of central banks' monetary easing policies, which have, in effect pumped more money into the economy.

Historically, they say, the correlation between gold and inflation is hard to ignore.

Over the past half century, the gold price has tracked the amount of money in the world -- measured broadly in terms of "M2" monetary supply -- fairly accurately, peaking at times of inflation, such as the mid-1970s and early 1980s.

The hedge funds argue that the recent swelling of the monetary base will translate into a spike in monetary supply. When it does, gold prices will follow.

"The number of funds who are exposed to gold has increased massively in the last three or four years," says Philip Klapwijk, executive chairman of GFMS, a precious metals consultancy.

In common with other investors, hedge funds are also keen to hold their gold in physical form -- either as bars in a vault or as an investment in an exchange-traded fund backed by physical assets.

Marcus Grubb, head of investment research at the World Gold Council, an industry-backed body, says the funds are looking to reduce counterparty risk in the event of another crisis: "In the past they might have been happy to just use futures strategy. Now they are looking to have physical investment."

Many analysts agree that gold is likely to set fresh nominal all-time highs in the coming months. But they also see the weight of investment in the metal as a warning signal.

Mr. Klapwijk says the rush to invest in the metal is not irrational. The motivation is fear about the debasement of paper currencies and of a panic in markets fuelled by any worsening in the eurozone debt crisis. But he also says that gold currently has "elements of a bubble."

Jeffrey Currie, head of commodities research at Goldman Sachs, points to a strong historical inverse relationship between gold prices and real interest rates. The time to sell, he says, will be when the economy returns to normal.

"It's pretty simple. Just stay long until real rates rise, likely driven by central banks taking liquidity out of the system."

"Gold's appeal is clear in this zero-cost-of-carry environment," says Mr Klapwijk. "But what if real interest rates were at 3 per cent? In my view, investor interest would be a good deal lower."

At that point, other supply and demand factors may come into play.

As the price of gold has risen, jewellery buying in India, typically the backbone of gold consumption, has fallen sharply. So if investors bought gold at a slower rate or became net sellers, the price would probably fall until other sources of demand picked up the slack.

"Don't forget: Gold is also a commodity with supply and demand fundamentals that can come into play," says Mr. Klapwijk.

Some managers are all to aware of the distinction, and view with derision the bets of their colleagues in a market they know little about.

"The problem is that people see it [gold] as both a commodity and a refuge," said the manager of one London-based macro hedge fund. "It is not really a liquid instrument and there's a danger that the market is being cornered."

Paulson & Co. remains optimistic that the trade is not crowded. In a presentation to potential investors, salesmen from the firm point out that gold ETF holdings amount to $78.3 billion,a fraction of the $2,849 billion held by U.S. money market funds. The implication is that, with massive unconventional monetary easing under way, gold will become the ultimate store of value.

Not all hedge funds are convinced, however. While a third of Paulson & Co.'s assets under management are denominated in gold, most of the holdings are those of its employees, including Mr. Paulson.

In spite of having one of the best names in the business, Mr Paulson's dedicated gold fund, which has a capacity of up to $5 billion, has raised just $500 million.

* * *

Join GATA here:

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 27-30, 2010
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
http://www.neworleansconference.com/redirect.php?page=index.html&source_...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy to Become Coal Producer This Year
with 1.5 Billion Tonnes of Resource

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX.V: PCY) announced on May 11 that it has entered into a mine services agreement with Leighton Asia Ltd. to begin coal production this year. Production will begin with a 250,000-tonne starter pit as planned in August, with production advancing to 2 million tonnes per year in 2011. Prophecy is fully funded to production and its management team includes John Morganti, Arnold Armstrong, and Rob McEwen.

For Prophecy's complete press release about its production plans, please visit:

http://www.prophecyresource.com/news_2010_may11.php



Remobilize Gold To Save The World Economy!

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 05:00 PM PDT



Trading Week Outlook: July 12 - 16, 2010

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 04:45 PM PDT

All Things Forex submits:

The U.S. corporate earnings, the uncertainty surrounding the stress tests of major EU banks, and a sequence of inflation, industrial activity and consumer spending data from some of the largest economies in the world will be the main factors driving the trends for equities, commodities and currencies in the busy week ahead.

In preparation for the new trading week, here is a list of the Top 10 spotlight economic events that every currency trader should pay attention to.


Complete Story »


GoldSeek Radio interviews GATA Chairman Bill Murphy

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 04:29 PM PDT

12:30a ET Sunday, July 10, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

GATA Chairman Bill Murphy was interviewed this week by Chris Waltzek of GoldSeek Radio.

The interview is eight minutes long and starts at the 88:20 mark at GoldSeek Radio here:

http://radio.goldseek.com/

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy to Become Coal Producer This Year
with 1.5 Billion Tonnes of Resource

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX.V: PCY) announced on May 11 that it has entered into a mine services agreement with Leighton Asia Ltd. to begin coal production this year. Production will begin with a 250,000-tonne starter pit as planned in August, with production advancing to 2 million tonnes per year in 2011. Prophecy is fully funded to production and its management team includes John Morganti, Arnold Armstrong, and Rob McEwen.

For Prophecy's complete press release about its production plans, please visit:

http://www.prophecyresource.com/news_2010_may11.php



Join GATA here:

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 27-30, 2010
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
http://www.neworleansconference.com/redirect.php?page=index.html&source_...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Sona Resources Expects Positive Cash Flow from Blackdome,
Plans Aggressive Exploration of Elizabeth Gold Property

On May 18, 2010, Sona Resources Corp. (TSXV: SYS, Frankfurt: QS7) announced the release of a preliminary economic assessment for gold production at its flagship Blackdome and Elizabeth properties in British Columbia.

Sona Executive Chairman Nick Ferris says: "We view this as a baseline scenario for gold production. The project is highly sensitive to the price of gold. A conservative valuation of gold at $1,093 per ounce would result in a pre-tax cash flow of $54 million. The assessment indicates that underground mining at the two sites would recover 183,600 ounces of gold and 62,500 ounces of silver. Permitting and infrastructure are already in place for processing ore at the Blackdome mill, with a 200-tonne per day throughput over an eight-year mine life. Our near-term goal is to continue aggressive exploration at Elizabeth and develop a million-plus-ounce gold resource, commencing production in 2013."

For complete information on Sona Resources Corp. please visit: www.SonaResources.com

A Canadian gold opportunity ready for growth



To King World News, Turk explains disbelief of chances for deflation

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 03:44 PM PDT

11:45p ET Saturday, July 10, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Interviewed this week by Eric King of King World News, GoldMoney founder, Freemarket Gold & Money Report editor, and GATA consultant James Turk explains why he believes deflation with the U.S. dollar is impossible. Turk adds that he thinks gold's latest bottom is in. You can listen to the interview at the King World News Internet site here:

http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/7/10_J...

Meanwhile over at the Freemarket Gold & Money Report, Turk writes that his recent essay asserting that banks have begun to lend money again was in error because of bank accounting gimmickry. Turk's explanation is headlined "Banks Are Not Lending Again" and you can find it here:

http://www.fgmr.com/banks-are-not-lending.html

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Sona Resources Expects Positive Cash Flow from Blackdome,
Plans Aggressive Exploration of Elizabeth Gold Property

On May 18, 2010, Sona Resources Corp. (TSXV: SYS, Frankfurt: QS7) announced the release of a preliminary economic assessment for gold production at its flagship Blackdome and Elizabeth properties in British Columbia.

Sona Executive Chairman Nick Ferris says: "We view this as a baseline scenario for gold production. The project is highly sensitive to the price of gold. A conservative valuation of gold at $1,093 per ounce would result in a pre-tax cash flow of $54 million. The assessment indicates that underground mining at the two sites would recover 183,600 ounces of gold and 62,500 ounces of silver. Permitting and infrastructure are already in place for processing ore at the Blackdome mill, with a 200-tonne per day throughput over an eight-year mine life. Our near-term goal is to continue aggressive exploration at Elizabeth and develop a million-plus-ounce gold resource, commencing production in 2013."

For complete information on Sona Resources Corp. please visit: www.SonaResources.com

A Canadian gold opportunity ready for growth



Join GATA here:

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 27-30, 2010
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
http://www.neworleansconference.com/redirect.php?page=index.html&source_...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy to Become Coal Producer This Year
with 1.5 Billion Tonnes of Resource

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX.V: PCY) announced on May 11 that it has entered into a mine services agreement with Leighton Asia Ltd. to begin coal production this year. Production will begin with a 250,000-tonne starter pit as planned in August, with production advancing to 2 million tonnes per year in 2011. Prophecy is fully funded to production and its management team includes John Morganti, Arnold Armstrong, and Rob McEwen.

For Prophecy's complete press release about its production plans, please visit:

http://www.prophecyresource.com/news_2010_may11.php



The Financial Con Of The Decade Explained So Simply Even A Congressman Will Get It

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 02:13 PM PDT


Sometimes, when chasing the bouncing ball of fraud and corruption on a daily basis, it is easy to lose sight of the forest for the millions of trees (all of which have a 150% LTV fourth-lien on them, underwritten by Goldman Sachs, which is short the shrubbery tranche). Luckily, Charles Hugh Smith, of oftwominds.com has taken the time to put it all into such simple and compelling terms, even corrupt North Carolina congressmen will not have the chance to plead stupidity after reading this.

Of course, to those familiar with the work of Austrian economists, none of this will come as a surprise. 

1. Enable trillions of dollars in mortgages guaranteed to default by packaging unlimited quantities of them into mortgage-backed securities (MBS), creating umlimited demand for fraudulently originated loans.

2. Sell these MBS as "safe" to credulous investors, institutions, town councils in Norway, etc., i.e. "the bezzle" on a global scale.

3. Make huge "side bets" against these doomed mortgages so when they default then the short-side bets generate billions in profits.

4. Leverage each $1 of actual capital into $100 of high-risk bets.

5. Hide the utterly fraudulent bets offshore and/or off-balance sheet (not that the regulators you had muzzled would have noticed anyway).

6. When the longside bets go bad, transfer hundreds of billions of dollars in Federal guarantees, bailouts and backstops into the private hands which made the risky bets, either via direct payments or via proxies like AIG. Enable these private Power Elites to borrow hundreds of billions more from the Treasury/Fed at zero interest.

7. Deposit these funds at the Federal Reserve, where they earn 3-4%. Reap billions in guaranteed income by borrowing Federal money for free and getting paid interest by the Fed.

8. As profits pile up, start buying boatloads of short-term U.S. Treasuries. Now the taxpayers who absorbed the trillions in private losses and who transferred trillions in subsidies, backstops, guarantees, bailouts and loans to private banks and corporations, are now paying interest on the Treasuries their own money purchased for the banks/corporations.

9. Slowly acquire trillions of dollars in Treasuries--not difficult to do as the Federal government is borrowing $1.5 trillion a year.

10. Stop buying Treasuries and dump a boatload onto the market, forcing interest rates to rise as supply of new T-Bills exceeds demand (at least temporarily). Repeat as necessary to double and then triple interest rates paid on Treasuries.

11. Buy hundreds of billions in long-term Treasuries at high rates of interest. As interest rates rise, interest payments dwarf all other Federal spending, forcing extreme cuts in all other government spending.

12. Enjoy the hundreds of billions of dollars in interest payments being paid by taxpayers on Treasuries that were purchased with their money but which are safely in private hands.

Charles' conclusion does not need further commentary as it is absolutely spot on:

Since the Federal government could potentially inflate away these trillions in Treasuries, buy enough elected officials to force austerity so inflation remains tame. In essence, these private banks and corporations now own the revenue stream of the Federal government and its taxpayers. Neat con, and the marks will never understand how "saving our financial system" led to their servitude to the very interests they bailed out.

The circle is now complete: in "saving our financial system," the public borrowed trillions and transferred the money to private Power Elites, who then buy the public debt with the money swindled out of the taxpayer. Then the taxpayers transfer more wealth every year to the Power Elites/Plutocracy in the form of interest on the Treasury debt. The Power Elites will own the debt that was taken on to bail them out of bad private bets: this is the culmination of privatized gains, socialized risk.

In effect, it's a Third World/colonial scam on a gigantic scale: plunder the public treasury, then buy the debt which was borrowed and transferred to your pockets. You are buying the country with money you borrowed from its taxpayers. No despot could do better.

As for part two of this epic con we are all living through, Charles explains as follows:

The Con of the Decade (Part II) meshes neatly with the first Con of the Decade. Yesterday I described how the financial Plutocracy can transfer ownership of the Federal government's income stream via using the taxpayer's money to buy the debt that the taxpayers borrowed to bail out the Plutocracy.

In order for the con to work, however, the Power Elites and their politico toadies in Congress, the Treasury and the Fed must convince the peasantry that low tax rates on unearned income are not just "free market capitalism at its best" but that they are also "what the country needs to get moving again."

The first step of the con was successfully fobbed off on the peasantry in 2001: lower the taxes paid by the most productive peasants marginally while massively lowering the effective taxes paid by the financial Plutocracy.

One Year Later, No Sign of Improvement in America's Income Inequality Problem:

Income inequality has grown massively since 2000. According to Harvard Magazine, 66% of 2001-2007's income growth went to the top 1% of Americans, while the other 99% of the population got a measly 6% increase. How is this possible? One thing to consider is that in 2001, George W. Bush cut $1.3 trillion in taxes, and 32.6% of the cut went to the top 1%. Another factor is Bush's decision to increase the national debt from $5 trillion to $11 trillion. The combination of increased government spending and lower taxes helped the top 1% considerably.

The second part of the con is to mask much of the Power Elites' income streams behind tax shelters and other gaming-of-the-system so the advertised rate appears high to the peasantry but the effective rate paid on total income is much much lower.

The tax shelters are so numerous and so effective that it takes thousands of pages of tax codes and armies of toadies to pursue them all: family trusts, oil depletion allowances, tax-free bonds and of course special one-off tax breaks arranged by "captured" elected officials.

Step three is to convince the peasantry that $600 in unearned income (capital gains) should be taxed in the same way as $600 million. The entire key to the U.S. tax code is to tax earned income heavily but tax unearned income (the majority of the Plutocracy's income is of course unearned) not at all or very lightly.

In a system which rewarded productive work and provided disincentives to rampant speculation and fraud, the opposite would hold: unearned income would be taxed at much higher rates than earned income, which would be taxed lightly, especially at household incomes below $100,000.

If the goal were to encourage "investing" while reining in the sort of speculations which "earn" hedge fund managers $600 million each (no typo, that was the average of the top 10 hedgies' personal take of their funds gains), then all unearned income (interest, dividends, capital gains, rents from property, oil wells, etc.) up to $6,000 a year would be free--no tax. Unearned income between $6,000 and $60,000 would be taxed at 20%, roughly half the top rate for earned income. This would leave 95% of U.S. households properly encouraged to invest via low tax rates.

Above $60,000, then unearned income would be taxed the same as earned income, and above $1 million (the top 1/10 of 1% of households) then it would be taxed at 50%. Above $10 million, it would be taxed at 60%. Such a system would offer disincentives to the speculative hauls made by the top 1/10 of 1% while encouraging investing in the lower 99%.

Could such a system actually be passed into law and enforced by a captured, toady bureaucracy and Congress? Of course not. But it is still a worthy exercise to take apart the rationalizations being offered to justify rampant speculative looting, collusion, corruption and fraud.

The last step of the con is to raise taxes on the productive peasantry to provide the revenues needed to pay the Plutocracy its interest on Treasuries. If the "Bush tax cuts" are repealed, the actual effective rates paid on unearned income will remain half (20%) of the rates on earned income (wages, salaries, profits earned from small business, etc.) which are roughly 40% at higher income levels.

The financial Plutocracy will champion the need to rein in Federal debt, now that they have raised the debt via plundering the public coffers and extended ownership over that debt.

Now the con boils down to insuring the peasantry pay enough taxes to pay the interest on the Federal debt--interest which is sure to rise considerably. The 1% T-Bill rates were just part of the con to convince the peasantry that trillions of dollars could be borrowed "with no consequences." Those rates will steadily rise once the financial Power Elites own enough of the Treasury debt. Then the game plan will be to lock in handsome returns on long-term Treasuries, and command the toady politicos to support "austerity."

The austerity will not extend to the financial Elites, of course. That's the whole purpose of the con. "Some are more equal than others," indeed.

h/t Andrew


Will Public Austerity Cause Private Sector Paralysis?

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 01:58 PM PDT


As the whole world prepares for years of austerity, now that virtually everyone is aware that sovereign debt levels are unsustainable and the drive to push public sector deficits down has reached a crescendo, one question remains open: what will happen to the private sector deleveraging commenced the world over in the aftermath of the Lehman bankruptcy. Goldman's Jan Hatzius takes a look at this question, and reaches some very unpleasant conclusions. Looking at the closed system of the financial balances of the private sector, the public sector and the rest of the world (i.e., private balance + public balance = current account balance), in which the push for deleveraging in the private sector, the rush to ramp up exports, and the imminent Age of Austerity all signal an upcoming unprecedented "demand shortfall for the economy as a whole", Hatzius concludes gloomily  that "given the forces of retrenchment and balance sheet repair, the risks to the growth of aggregate demand?as well as risk-free interest rates?over the medium term are tilted to the downside. Policymakers can provide some relief, but realistically will find it hard to neutralize the headwinds altogether" The economist also looks at what realist fiscal and monetary rabbits are left in the hat of the administration/Fed, and realizes that there is little that can be done to prevent what he dubs a "slowdown" and what everyone else whose bonus isn't tied in with perpetual growth assumptions, a new wave of the Second Great Depression.

First, Jan observes the dynamics of the current economic cycle. In case anyone is still confused about it, here is his summation in a nutshell: "Relative to the start of the recession, the level of employment payrolls is now about 8% lower than in the median cycle of the 1954-1982 period. Scaled to the current level of the labor force, this is a shortfall of roughly 10 million jobs. The size of this gap reflects two unusual features of the current cycle? an unusually deep recession and an unusually weak recovery." We recommend the following refresher course in one of the basic laws of economics, which the Obama administration, try hard as it might, will not be able to get the Supreme Court's repeal vote.

Exhibit 1 illustrates the extent to which the recent recession and its aftermath have diverged from postwar experience by plotting the level of nonfarm payroll employment against prior postwar cycles, starting from the peak of the business cycle (i.e. the start of the recession). Relative to the start of the recession, the level of employment payrolls is now about 8% lower than in the median cycle of the 1954-1982 period. Scaled to the current level of the labor force, this is a shortfall of roughly 10 million jobs.

The size of this gap reflects two unusual features of the current cycle?an unusually deep recession and an unusually weak recovery. This is in stark contrast to the ?what goes down must come up? pattern predicted by many forecasters, at least until recently.

The sheer size of this gap suggests strongly that the cycle is fundamentally different from its postwar predecessors. There are a number of alternative though not mutually exclusive ways of illustrating these differences. But at the most basic level, we view the distinguishing feature of the current cycle as a collective attempt by the different sectors of the economy? households, firms, governments, and the rest of the world?to reduce their debt loads by pushing spending below income. This does not mean that every sector is trying to run a  surplus?as is well known, the US federal government is currently running a large deficit and planning to do so for many years. But it means that those sectors that are running deficits are moving less aggressively than those that are running surpluses. This implies a demand shortfall for the economy as a whole.

To illustrate the reasoning, Exhibit 2 shows the financial balances? the differences between income and spending? of the three sectors of the economy, namely the private sector (households and firms), the public sector (federal, state, and local), and the rest of the world. (The rest-of-the-world balance is simply the inverse of the current account balance, representing a capital inflow when the current account is in deficit.) The financial balance is the difference between total income and total spending, and in general equals a sector?'s net lending to other sectors.

Since the three sectors constitute a closed system, one sector?'s borrowing must always be another sector?'s lending. Hence, the three sectoral balances must sum to zero:

(1) private balance + public balance = CA balance.


Exhibit 1 shows the current configuration of the three balances. As of the first quarter of 2010, the private sector was running a 7% of GDP surplus, the public sector a 10% of GDP deficit, and the rest of the world a 3% of GDP surplus vis-`-vis the United States.

But while this equation must always hold ex post as a matter of accounting, it need not hold ex ante. In other words, is quite possible for different sectors to pursue spending plans that are mutually inconsistent with one another, and such inconsistencies can keep aggregate demand away from the economy?'s supply potential. In general, if all sectors taken together aim to run a financial deficit?i.e. want to spend more than their expected income and want to finance the difference by borrowing?the economy will tend to overheat. Conversely, if all sectors taken  together aim to run a financial surplus, i.e. want to spend less than their expected income and use the difference to pay down debt ?the economy will tend to operate below potential.

We can illustrate this point using some simple assumptions. First, we assume that the current account is fixed at a deficit of 3% of GDP. This is a big simplification, but it does capture the fact that at least some of the factors causing a retrenchment in the United States are also causing a retrenchment in other countries that experienced a credit bubble.

Second, we assume that the public is uncomfortable? or Congress believes that the public is uncomfortable? whenever the general government deficit is above 7% of GDP. While larger deficits are possible for short periods of time, Congress ultimately responds to them by cutting spending and/or raising taxes. The precise number is obviously arbitrary, but we do believe that there is a level of government deficits beyond which the political demands for retrenchment become difficult to resist.

These assumptions imply that the private sector cannot aim to run a financial surplus of more than 4% of GDP without sapping aggregate demand. This is a serious problem because our analysis a few weeks ago concluded that the private sector may target a financial surplus of significantly more than 4% of GDP for the next few years in order to reduce its debt burden at an acceptable pace. This point is illustrated in Exhibit 3. The top panel shows the ratio of private sector debt to GDP, while the bottom panel plots the change in this ratio against the private sector financial balance. The point to note is that large surpluses are likely to be necessary in order to bring the private debt/GDP ratio back to historically more normal levels. In fact, even if we assume? highly  optimistically? that the private debt/GDP ratio only needs to return to the upward sloping trend line seen since the 1950s over a five year period, the private sector balance may need to stay near the current 7% of GDP level for the next five years. In fact, we believe it is likely that the private debt/GDP ratio will need to decline to a level well below the prior trendline, although the extent of this decline is difficult to estimate with any degree of confidence.

So what happens if the private sector indeed wants to run a 7% of GDP surplus? This means that on an ex ante  basis, spending will fall short of (expected) income by 3% of GDP. This demand shortfall saps production, and consequently the income from production. As a result, private sector income is lower than expected, which pushes the private sector balance below 7% of GDP (i.e. to a ?looser? position than desired by the private sector) unless there is a further downward adjustment in private sector spending.

Moreover, lower private sector income implies lower tax revenues, which has a similar impact on the government balance and could trigger further austerity moves by Congress. Ultimately, this adverse feedback loop doesn'?t end until someone accepts a smaller surplus or a larger deficit.

Hatzius then muses on what the possible responses to this imminent economic contraction are, on either the fiscal or the monetary side, and to the chagrin of Keynesianites, finds no feasible options.

The Response of Fiscal Policy…

Let us suppose that we are in the situation outlined at the end of the previous section. What can policymakers do?

In the context of the financial balances framework, the most straightforward response is to boost aggregate demand by targeting a government deficit of at least 10% of GDP?indeed, a bigger target would be better because a period of sharply above-trend growth would be highly desirable to fill in the economy?'s large output gap.

The main objection to such a policy is that higher public deficits raise the risks of a public debt crisis of confidence. Our own view is that these risks have been exaggerated, at least in the case of the United States. Public debt and especially public debt service are still at moderate levels, and the bond market is showing few signs of discomfort with the US fiscal outlook. Moreover, as a practical matter it is in any case difficult to avoid large deficits as long as the private sector is retrenching and the current account is in deficit. As already noted, this saps revenue growth. So it is better to accept the need for these deficits on an ex ante basis since, to a large extent, they will happen ex post anyway.

Nevertheless, we do recognize the difficulty of implementing large-scale fiscal expansion over an extended period of time. Even though we and many others have presented compelling (we think) evidence that last year?s fiscal stimulus package has helped the economy, polling evidence suggests that the public does not buy this; for example, in the most recent Pew Research poll, only about one-third of respondents thought that the stimulus package had ?helped? the economy. Evidently, it is difficult to persuade voters that running large-scale public deficits at a time when many are cutting back in their personal lives is a good idea. If so, the idea that policymakers can offset whatever restraint is coming from private sector retrenchment by ramping up the fiscal stimulus may be sensible economically but unrealistic politically.

One way to make meaningful near-term fiscal easing more acceptable might be to couple it with longer term fiscal tightening. This would argue for a plan to ease the near-term fiscal stance via extensions of unemployment insurance (again), aid to state governments, and the bulk of the 2001/2003 tax cuts (temporarily)?perhaps along with a payroll tax holiday?but couple this with legislation to slow the growth of spending and raise direct and indirect taxes 3-5 years in the future. Another (theoretical?) possibility is to make future tax hikes explicitly conditional on the cyclical position of the economy, perhaps simply measured by the level of the unemployment rate and/or inflation.

…and of Monetary Policy

If these options are out of reach and fiscal policy therefore remains too tight, the alternative is further Fed easing. But even under normal circumstances? that is, if the funds rate has not yet hit the zero bound?its impact in the simple financial balances framework described above is less direct than that of fiscal policy. The main impact of monetary policy on ex ante financial balances is that lower interest rates and/or easier credit in some other form aim to entice the private sector to borrow a little more, or at least to stretch out its retrenchment out over a longer period. But when the channels of credit intermediation are impaired and the private sector has decided to reduce its debt loads, it may be difficult to make as much difference as normal via monetary policy.

These difficulties are magnified in the current environment, where the funds rate is bounded at zero. Fed officials have managed to ease financial conditions by backstopping the financial system and purchasing mortgage-backed securities, and this has probably limited the extent of the private-sector retrenchment to some degree. But our analysis suggests that the total impact has been only equivalent to a 70-basis-point cut in the federal funds rate target. This small a change is unlikely to reverse a fundamental move toward financial restraint and balance sheet repair.

So what else could the Fed do? One option is ?more of the same ??an even more explicit commitment to low rates, a further small cut in the interest rate on excess reserves (IOER), or additional asset purchases. However, while this would undoubtedly ease financial conditions a bit more, it is hard to believe that the impact would be very large unless the asset purchases were very aggressive. One potentially more powerful option is the adoption of a significantly higher inflation target, as suggested by a number of prominent academic macroeconomists. If such an announcement is credible, it could increase inflation expectations and reduce real interest rates. This could lead the private sector to slow down its retrenchment?i.e. cut the ex ante private sector surplus ?and thereby provide a boost to growth.

However, one important reason for why Fed officials have not shown any signs that they are actively considering such a policy is that it risks increasing inflation risk premia as well as inflation expectations. While higher inflation expectations lower real interest rates?defined as nominal rates minus expected inflation?and are generally welcome at a time of significant deflation risks, a higher inflation risk premium would offset that by raising real interest rates and tightening financial conditions. It is therefore not surprising that Fed officials have so far eschewed any discussion of a higher inflation target, although this could change as inflation declines further.

Jan's conclusion is brief and to the point: the days of deluding ourselves things are getting better, are rapidly coming to an end.

The upshot of our discussion: given the forces of retrenchment and balance sheet repair, the risks to the growth of aggregate demand? as well as risk-free interest rates?over the medium term are tilted to the downside. Policymakers can provide some relief, but realistically will find it hard to neutralize the headwinds altogether. Thus, the risks to growth over the medium term are clearly tilted to the downside.

 


Not A Dip, But A Swan Dive Off Of Niagara Falls Into a Dry River Bed

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 12:13 PM PDT

I was sitting here trying to find a way to wrap up the week and then, like a bolt of lightning, an idea hit me.  Gold expert Jim Sinclair sent me this story: "Federal Budget Deficit Hits $1 Trillion For 1st 9 Months Of FY'10."  The story said, "The shortfall, reflecting $2.6 trillion in outlays for the first three quarters and $1.6 trillion in receipts, narrowed slightly compared with the same point in fiscal 2009."  So where did the "shortfall" come from?  Try the more that 8 million who lost their jobs.  The story went on to say, ". . . individual income and payroll tax receipts were down 4% over the nine-month period, suggesting that wages and salaries have not improved to the extent that corporate profits have." Corporate profits have "improved" because they laid-off all those workers!!  (Click here for the entire Dow Jones Newswires story)   
Sinclair says, "Nothing has changed. Nothing has been rescued. The can that is being kicked daily down the path is going to turn around and bite the kickers. 
Gold is the only insurance." 
When things get bad enough, there will be more stimulus cash put into the economy and more bank bailouts.  Sinclair is like legendary football quarterback Joe Montana–never bet against either of them.
More Here..


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Jim's Mailbox

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 09:54 AM PDT

Bullish Money Flows in Gold
CIGA Eric

Targeted, fearful headlines, intended to create an emotional response in gold, continue to hide inflows (outflow of short) into weakness from connected players. The operation is coordinated and professional.

Gold London P.M Fixed and the Commercial Traders COT Futures and Options Stochastic Weighted Average of Net Long As A % of Open Interest
clip_image001

While connected players setup for the next advance, they do so while retail money is clearly on the wrong side of the trade (short).

Gold London P.M Fixed and the Nonreportable Traders COT Futures and Options Stochastic Weighted Average of Net Long As A % of Open Interest
clip_image002

Are you ready for the unexpected?

More…


A Key Piece in the Oil Leak Story: Two Sections of Drill Pipe Lodged in the Blowout Preventer

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 09:43 AM PDT


Washington’s Blog

On June 30th, I noted that the Department of Energy had found that there were two section of drilling pipe lodge in the blowout preventer.

Yesterday, the Times-Picayune gave an update on this story, which includes competing interpretations about where the second section came from and what that means for the relief wells:

For the first time Friday, the Coast Guard and BP acknowledged that a mysterious second pipe, wedged next to the drill pipe in what remains of the Deepwater Horizon's riser, is fouling up the works where the well is spewing hundreds of millions of gallons of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

 

"We used a diamond saw and we got inside. We found there was actually two sets of drill pipe there," said retired Adm. Thad Allen, the top U.S. Coast Guard official overseeing the response to America's worst-ever oil spill.

 

***

 

It "presumably fell down beside it as a result of the explosion and the riser pipe being bent over," Allen said. He noted that the second pipe does not have oil shooting from it.

 

BP officials said late Friday that they believe the second pipe is drill pipe. Pictures show it is similar in diameter to the known drill pipe.

 

While Allen said he believes the second pipe fell from above, some experts have advanced another explanation. They believe poorly cemented casings -- tubes that are supposed to form solid walls down thousands of feet of the well bore -- may have been dislodged by the blast of natural gas that shot up out of the well and above the sea floor.

 

***

 

The idea that a loose pipe shot up from deeper in the well and prevented the shear ram from closing has been espoused by such experts as oil industry investment banker Matt Simmons and Bob Bea, a University of California at Berkeley engineer leading a scientific investigation into the blowout [Bea is an expert in offshore drilling and a high-level governmental adviser concerning disasters]. But others have wondered if the mystery pipe isn't just a section of the same drill pipe that came loose, or even a pipe that fell down the riser from the rig 5,000 feet above.

The source of the second segment is key to determining the condition of the oil well beneath the seafloor. If Simmons and Bea are proven right, drilling the relief wells will be a lot more challenging.

Therefore, I hope they are wrong, and that the second drill pipe came from:

(1) a collapse of pipe above the blowout preventer;

or

(2) a miscellaneous segment of drilling pipe (drilling pipe is temporarily used in drilling a well, and is not the same as well casing or even well lining, which are permanently installed to support the well).

The second section of drill pipe is key to the oil leak story for another reason. As the Times-Picayune notes, it has contributed to problems in securely capping the leak from the point where it's leaking so that more oil can be captured:

The presence of two pipes could have also contributed to BP's failure to make a clean cut on the riser when securing the existing containment dome, inhibiting its ability to collect the maximum amount of oil.

***

Allen said the second pipe also led to a jagged cut on the larger riser pipe, forcing the response team to use the loose cap with a rubber seal. And now, the two pieces are forcing the team to spend several days tying them together and clearing the way for a new, hopefully more solid connection.

Finally, the two sections of drill pipe are important because they may have been one of the reasons that the blowout preventer failed in the first place.

As the Times-Picayune notes:

Some experts say a second piece of drill pipe in the riser could have prevented shear rams on the rig's blowout preventer from sealing the well and permanently cutting off the flow of oil after the April 20 explosion.

Even if it turns out that this is one of the causes of the BOP's failure, it might not be the only cause.

As I pointed out in May:

[Mike Williams, the chief electronics technician on the Deepwater Horizon, and one of the last workers to leave the doomed rig] claimed that the blowout preventer was then damaged [Several weeks before the Gulf oil explosion] when a crewman accidentally moved a joystick, applying hundreds of thousands of pounds of force. Pieces of rubber were found in the drilling fluid, which he said implied damage to a crucial seal. But a supervisor declared the find to be “not a big deal”, Mr Williams alleged.


Government Trying to Sweep Size of Oil Spill Under the Rug, Just As It Has Tried to Sweep the Economic Crisis, 9/11 and All Other Crises Under the Rug

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 09:21 AM PDT


Washington’s Blog

As I previously pointed out, the Gulf oil spill is very similar to 9/11, because - in both cases - the responders helping with rescue and clean up were getting sick ... but were told they don't need any safety gear. And see this.

In addition, the government is keeping scientists away from "ground zero" of the oil spill and - for that reason - scientists cannot accurately measure the size of the oil spill.

BP has also tried to cover up its blunders by lowballing spill estimates, keeping reporters out of areas hardest hit by the oil (and see this, this, this and this) and threatening to arrest them if they try to take pictures (and see this), hiding dead birds and other sealife, and using dispersants to hide the amount of spilled oil (the dispersants are only worsening the damage caused by the spill).

The government is complicit in all of these cover-ups. Indeed, the Obama administration has made it a felony to get near enough to oiled wildlife and beaches to film them.

Similarly, the official 9/11 investigators were themselves largely denied funding, access to the site and the evidence contained there, or even access to such basic information as the blueprints for the world trade center.

Indeed, just as the government and BP have consistently underestimated the amount of oil gushing out of the Gulf, the blueprints for the World Trade Center are still to this day being withheld from reporters and the public, and the government agency in charge of the investigation has grossly mischaracterized the structure of the buildings.

How are we supposed to improve building safety regulations if the blueprints are still being hidden from engineers and scientists investigating the collapse of world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on September 11th?

Moreover, as I previously pointed out:

9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton wrote:

Those who knew about those videotapes — and did not tell us about them — obstructed our investigation.

[Moreover]:

  • The chairs of both the 9/11 Commission and the Joint Inquiry of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees into 9/11 said that government "minders" obstructed the investigation into 9/11 by intimidating witnesses
  • The 9/11 Commissioners concluded that officials from the Pentagon lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements
  • Investigators for the Congressional Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House. As the New York Times notes:
    Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence . . .

    * * *

    The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers.

  • In his book "Intelligence Matters," Mr. Graham, the co-chairman of the Congressional inquiry with Representative Porter J. Goss, Republican of Florida, said an F.B.I. official wrote them in November 2002 and said "the administration would not sanction a staff interview with the source.'' On Tuesday, Mr. Graham called the letter "a smoking gun" and said, "The reason for this cover-up goes right to the White House."

Of course, the government's response to the economic crisis, torture, the anthrax attacks, and just about every other crisis has been the same: try to sweep it under the rug.

It almost seems as if the main activity of government these days is trying to cover up criminal negligence and fraud ... instead of actually solving problems, firing - let alone convicting - the folks who caused the problems, or changing things enough to prevent future crises.


Seattle's "Actuarial Valuation" of City Pension Plan Sinks to 62% Funded; I Say It's Far Worse

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 08:21 AM PDT

Michael Shedlock submits:

A new Seattle report says the city will have to increase pension contributions to keep its plan solvent. Please consider Seattle's retirement investments plunge deeply.

The City of Seattle will have to substantially increase the amount of money it pays into its employees' retirement system to cover future obligations because its related investments took big hits during the economic meltdown, according to a report presented to the City Council Friday.


Complete Story »


Futures positions make gold, silver very bullish again, Butler tells KWN

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 08:00 AM PDT

4p ET Saturday, July 10, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold (and Silver):

Silver market analyst Ted Butler tells King World News' Eric King that the latest futures market commitment of traders reports are strongly bullish for gold and silver now that the manipulative commercial traders covered unusually large short positions last week. You can listen to the interview at the King World News Internet site here:

http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast_Gold+/Entries/2010/...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy to Become Coal Producer This Year
with 1.5 Billion Tonnes of Resource

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX.V: PCY) announced on May 11 that it has entered into a mine services agreement with Leighton Asia Ltd. to begin coal production this year. Production will begin with a 250,000-tonne starter pit as planned in August, with production advancing to 2 million tonnes per year in 2011. Prophecy is fully funded to production and its management team includes John Morganti, Arnold Armstrong, and Rob McEwen.

For Prophecy's complete press release about its production plans, please visit:

http://www.prophecyresource.com/news_2010_may11.php



Join GATA here:

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 27-30, 2010
Hilton New Orleans Riverside Hotel
http://www.neworleansconference.com/index.html

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Sona Resources Expects Positive Cash Flow from Blackdome,
Plans Aggressive Exploration of Elizabeth Gold Property

On May 18, 2010, Sona Resources Corp. (TSXV: SYS, Frankfurt: QS7) announced the release of a preliminary economic assessment for gold production at its flagship Blackdome and Elizabeth properties in British Columbia.

Sona Executive Chairman Nick Ferris says: "We view this as a baseline scenario for gold production. The project is highly sensitive to the price of gold. A conservative valuation of gold at $1,093 per ounce would result in a pre-tax cash flow of $54 million. The assessment indicates that underground mining at the two sites would recover 183,600 ounces of gold and 62,500 ounces of silver. Permitting and infrastructure are already in place for processing ore at the Blackdome mill, with a 200-tonne per day throughput over an eight-year mine life. Our near-term goal is to continue aggressive exploration at Elizabeth and develop a million-plus-ounce gold resource, commencing production in 2013."

For complete information on Sona Resources Corp. please visit: www.SonaResources.com

A Canadian gold opportunity ready for growth



More (Yellow) Ink for Bob Prechter

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:39 AM PDT

After getting a renewal notice for my Wall Street Journal subscription that was about four times as much as what I'd paid in recent years, it wasn't too hard a decision to let it lapse (honestly, what did they expect?). By the looks of the comments for Jason Zweig's article this weekend that features fear-mongerer Bob Prechter, you'd think that I'm not the only reader who is no longer a paying subscriber and that the ink is running a little yellow at the WSJ.

Get Ready for a Cataclysmic Market Crash! (Or Maybe Not)

_
Could the Dow really drop 90%?

Earlier this month, in an interview that was widely circulated online, market analyst Robert Prechter predicted that the Dow Jones Industrial Average will fall below 1000 within the next six years. The Dow promptly surged back above 10000, but it is worth asking whether Mr. Prechter might be right anyway.

Mr. Prechter is a technical analyst who studies the past price performance of the markets for clues to the future. He also believes that investors move in and out of the market on predictable waves of optimism and pessimism. "Because the mania [the bull markets of 1982 to 1999 and 2003 to 2007] was so terrific," he told me this week, "it will be followed by a negative trend in social mood that will lead to a complete retracement." That would put the Dow back to its levels in 1982, below 1000.

"In a deflationary environment, the last thing you want is to own any financial asset," Mr. Prechter added.

Yeah, and gold will never go over $400 as Prechter famously wrote early in the last decade.

Damien Hoffman over at Wall Street Cheat Sheet had the far superior Prechter column this week when he asked, Is Elliott Wave Theory High Priest Robert Prechter Certifiably Insane?


An Unsustainable Welfare-State Rat Race

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:15 AM PDT

Like a rat on its exercise wheel, the White House keeps on spinning though new spending program ideas without ever determining a finish line. Basically, how to pay for them.

If the Obama administration decides to step off the spending wheel too late it's likely to end up with a no-win situation similar to the options pictured below.

An Unsustainable Welfare-State Rat Race originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today's markets. Its been called "the most entertaining read of the day."


Markets Make Fools of Us All

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:06 AM PDT

The Daily Reckoning

As the Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced further above 10,000 yesterday, gold slipped back below $1,200 an ounce. We are not exactly sure what we think about the stock market's resurgence – or about gold's retreat – but we are pretty sure what we do NOT think.

We do not think stocks have vaulted into a new bullish trend; nor do we think gold has slumped into a new bearish trend. Rather, the recent moves feel like short-term, counter-trend noise. This noise might last a few weeks, but we would not mistake it for music.

That said, the financial markets could not care less what we say. The financial markets do not even care what Alan Greenspan or Abby Joseph Cohen say. In fact, the financial markets seem to delight in making fools out of sages. For more than a decade, the markets have made a fool out of the conventional "wisdom" that stocks are for buying and holding. During the last eleven and a half years, for example, the S&P 500 Index has delivered a total return of exactly zero.

The markets have also made a fool out of the conventional wisdom that gold is a barbarous relic – a monetary artifact. During the identical eleven and a half-year period when stocks were busy doing nothing, the gold price quadrupled!

Despite these shockingly contrary investment results, the conventional wisdom remains almost as foolish as ever. Gold is still nothing more than a "trading vehicle," according to Wall Street's professional sages, and stocks are still the greatest investment asset ever devised by Man. We would not dare to argue with the sages (they are sages after all), but we would point out that economic systems are as susceptible to entropy as natural systems. In other words, economies sometimes breakdown, either partially or completely.

In the natural realm, the Second Law of Thermodynamics asserts that systems tend toward greater entropy, or disorder. In the economic realm, a similar principal pertains, except that the agents of entropy usually go by the title of "Senator," "Treasury Secretary" or "Federal Reserve Chairman."

Here in the American economic system, private enterprises are doing their darnedest to prosper. But at the same time, public institutions are doing their darnedest to roadblock the paths to prosperity. In the name of "stimulating the economy," the Senators are ramping up taxation and deficit-spending, while the Treasury Secretaries are handing out taxpayer money to their friends on Wall Street, without ever asking for the taxpayers' permission.

In the midst of the resulting entropy, what's a Federal Reserve Chairman to do? He didn't authorize the hundred-billion-dollar bailouts and he didn't vote for the trillion-dollar budget deficits. Nevertheless, he's the one who's supposed to clean up the mess. He's the one who's supposed to devise and direct a monetary policy that counteracts the ill effects of our nation's reckless fiscal policy.

Can't be done.

America is spending trillions of dollars it does not have. She is promising to spend tens of trillions more over the next few years. She won't have that money either. But Ben Bernanke has it…and we expect him to spend it. As economic conditions worsen – or fail to improve – and as America's fiscal condition deteriorates, Helicopter Ben is likely to fly to the rescue with a variety of "policy responses" that will all amount to the same thing: dollar-printing. We don't blame Ben. What else can he do? He did not create the mess and no mortal can clean it up. But a printing press might help…at least for a while.

We don't make the rules, dear reader; we just try to remember them. And as we remember that economic systems tend toward randomness, we should also remember not to forgot to buy some gold along the way.

"I am bullish on gold," declares Rick Rule, a serially successful investor in gold mining companies. "I'm bearish on social promises, and as a consequence, bearish on currencies. I suspect that in the near term gold will do well, because it won't go down. Then gold will start to do well because people will perceive it as going up, rather than merely holding its own in terms of purchasing power.

"I came of age in investing in the '70s – a great gold bull market," Rule continues. "Beginning about 1978, when gold began its hyperbolic rise, it was going up from both 'greed buyers' and 'fear buyers.' I'm a fear buyer of gold; I buy it as catastrophe insurance. What happened at the beginning of 1978 was that the fear buyers would buy it, creating momentum that caused the greed buyers to step in.

"The uptick then reinforced the fear of the fear buyers, and there was this sort of 'stereo buying' in gold that caused a true hysteria – taking the gold price from $400 to the $850 blow-off. It wouldn't surprise me to see the same set of circumstances take place in the next two or three years."

It's hard to say whether fear or greed or "stereo buying" is driving the demand for US Gold Eagles. But whatever the primum movens, demand for all types of gold coinage is soaring.

The US Mint's authorized dealers ordered 97,000 US Gold Eagles in June. That's down from May's stratospheric figure, but still one of the strongest months this year. That's also an impressive quantity when you consider that June was the first month this year the Mint offered fractional (half-ounce, quarter-ounce, and one-tenth ounce) Eagles.

Sales of Silver Eagles topped three million – the fourth time that's happened this year. (It happened only once in 2009.) Therefore, based on sales for the first half of the year, total sales for 2010 should set another record…easily.

US Silver Eagle Sales

If precious metals prices continue climbing, as Rick Rule expects, the buyers of bullion coins would have plenty of opportunities to pat themselves on the back.

Eric Fry
for The Daily Reckoning

Markets Make Fools of Us All originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today's markets. Its been called "the most entertaining read of the day."

More articles from The Daily Reckoning….



The Central Bank Gold “Shell Game” Continues

Posted: 10 Jul 2010 07:04 AM PDT

The Daily Reckoning

We recently reported the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has been accepting gold like a "pawn shop" for central banks, but the BIS has since changed its tune. It emailed The Wall Street Journal to say the 346 tonnes of gold it has added to its vaults belong to commercial banks and not to central banks. Sure, anything's possible… yet this version of events seems unlikely, and we'll explain why below.

For reference, the gold holdings-related content in question comes from page 171 of the June 2010 BIS Annual Report:

"Included in 'Gold bars held at central banks' is SDR 8,160.1 million (346 tonnes) (2009: nil) of gold, which the Bank held in connection with gold swap operations, under which the Bank exchanges currencies for physical gold. The Bank has an obligation to return the gold at the end of the contract."

This was initially interpreted by The Wall Street Journal as reflecting an increase in gold swaps from central banks looking for cash. However, the WSJ has since corrected itself to say it reflects only gold loaned to the BIS by commercial banks, and not central banks.

Today, an interesting potential explanation for the updated phrasing was offered up by gold forecaster Julian Phillips. From GoldSeek.com:

"The Wall Street Journal informs us that the B.I.S. did these swaps with commercial banks. We know of no commercial bank that has 382 tonnes of gold on their books. It is likely then that should these commercial banks have been in the deal, they would have been acting for a central bank [or several over time] who wished to remain anonymous."

Phillips provides one of the more palatable explanations for the BIS' language update. Commercial banks are largely dependent on income-generating assets and securities, and it doesn't make much sense for them to hold actual physical gold. Further, it does seem logical that a central bank "pawning" its gold would want to make the chain of custody as murky as possible, and involving a commercial bank is a sensible enough way of achieving that end.

If it is true — that central banks are still behind this "biggest gold swap in history" — what's the significance of the transaction?

Here's Phillips' take:

"What is significant about this or these transactions is that gold is being used in international settlements after so many decades of being sidelined in the monetary system! The transaction itself confirms that gold is being used in international settlements, which is a dynamic confirmation of gold's return to the monetary system.

"A 'Swap' might be the first desperate step in such a transaction with the swapping bank hoping to repay the foreign exchange, but should it fail, the B.I.S. would have to decide either to keep the gold on its books or to sell it. Again, keeping it on its books is part confirmation that gold is active again on the monetary system, a big boost by itself! Gold is back and alive in the monetary system!"

Phillips sees this use of gold in international transactions as being even more important than recent increases in gold net purchasing by central banks. Not only are central banks adding to their stores of the yellow metal, but they are also putting the asset to work as a financial instrument.

This story is bound to develop further, and we'll be here to report back as to exactly which shell this golden "pea" crawled out from under.

You can also read more details in GoldSeek.com coverage of why gold is back as money.

Best,

Rocky Vega,
The Daily Reckoning

The Central Bank Gold "Shell Game" Continues originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today's markets. Its been called "the most entertaining read of the day."

More articles from The Daily Reckoning….



No comments:

Post a Comment