A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Monday, May 24, 2010

Gold World News Flash

Gold World News Flash


Gold Savers Will Get the Last Laugh

Posted: 23 May 2010 06:13 PM PDT

For that's what this cycle is all about. Cleansing the system of debt is a process fought tooth and nail by the banks, which have encouraged profligacy among the masses and their governments to an extent not seen in the last few generations.


Gold Market Update

Posted: 23 May 2010 06:11 PM PDT

Although gold and silver dropped quite sharply last week, longer-term charts reveal that nothing broke technically and the reactions were in fact within normal parameters.


Gold Market Update - May 23, 2010

Posted: 23 May 2010 06:08 PM PDT

Clive Maund Although gold and silver dropped quite sharply last week, longer-term charts reveal that nothing broke technically and the reactions were in fact within normal parameters. On its 2-year chart we can see that the fine longer-term uptrend in gold from late 2008 remains in force, and that despite last week’s drop, it is still some distance from breaking down. In recent weeks it had shown signs that it would not drop with the broad stockmarket, so while the fact that it did may be rather disappointing, the flip side is that with the broad market horribly oversold and due a rally gold looks set to bounce back strongly from here. Factors which support a rally now, in addition to the nearby trendline support, are the moving averages, which are in strongly bullish alignment, the proximity of the price with the 50-day moving average and the neutralization of the RSI indicator shown at the top of the chart, which had been showing a short-term critically overbough...


Silver Market Update - May 23, 2010

Posted: 23 May 2010 06:08 PM PDT

Clive Maund Although gold and silver dropped quite sharply last week, longer-term charts reveal that nothing broke technically and the reactions were in fact within normal parameters, and the reaction in silver was actually quite modest, given what could have happened in the circumstances. Silver’s 2-year chart puts its reaction last week into perspective. On this chart it doesn’t look like a big deal as it didn’t take it down to the bottom of the uptrend and didn’t even take it below its 200-day moving average. For reasons discussed in the Gold Market update, the broad market and PM sector are expected to stage a recovery rally shortly, and on the silver chart here we can see that it is certainly well placed to turn up again soon, for there is plenty of underlying support at and not far below the current price, arising principally from the lower channel support line and proximity of bullishly aligned moving averages, and depending on how st...


Silver is Inching Closer to an Upside Breakout

Posted: 23 May 2010 06:07 PM PDT

FGMR - Free Gold Money Report May 22, 2010 – Silver is inching closer to its long-awaited upside breakout. The huge accumulation pattern that silver has been building over the past three years is almost complete, as can be seen on the following chart. I noted in my last commentary that silver looks ready to soar and more to the point, that the developing chart pattern “will manifest its bullish significance when silver climbs above the neckline around $20”. That moment is rapidly approaching. Last week’s correction in prices may perhaps be the last one before silver’s upside breakout. Few people expect silver prices to rise during the summer, which is normally considered a quiet period for precious metal prices. Maybe the big surprise this year will be a spectacular summer rally for the precious metals. After all, that is what the silver chart is telling us. For my specific trading recommendations, see Trading....


Hugo Salinas-Price on Money and Why Silver Should Be Legal Mexican Currency

Posted: 23 May 2010 06:07 PM PDT

Sunday, May 23, 2010 – with Scott Smith Hugo Salinas-Price The Daily Bell is pleased to present an exclusive interview with Hugo Salinas-Price (left). Introduction: Hugo Salinas Price, 75, is a successful, retired businessman who lives in Mexico. He has been a follower of the Austrian School of Economics since his youth. He has written three books in Spanish on how and why silver should be instituted as money in Mexico, in parallel with paper money, and numerous related articles in English and Spanish, posted at his website. His organization, the Mexican Civic Association Pro Silver, is actively lobbying the Mexican Congress to approve legislation, which will institute the pure silver "Libertad" ounce as money. Daily Bell: What is your campaign in Mexico for sound financial policy? Hugo Salinas-Price: I actually avoid discussing "sound financial policy" because one can argue about that till the cows come home. During the last fifteen years I have dev...


Jim?s Mailbox

Posted: 23 May 2010 06:07 PM PDT

View the original post at jsmineset.com... May 23, 2010 04:25 PM Dear Jim, The "Recovery" continues apace. Regards, CIGA Pedro April mass layoffs rise led by manufacturing (Reuters) – The number of mass layoffs by U.S. employers rose in April led by manufacturers who shed workers even as the economy began to recover. The Labor Department said the number of mass layoff events — defined as job cuts involving at least 50 people from a single employer — increased by 228 to 1,856 as employers shed 200,870 jobs on a seasonally adjusted basis. More…   ABC of Silver (&Gold) CIGA Eric A – The surge above the 1/20/10 gap on a sign of strength on 5/11 was a technical breakout. B – The subsequent break below the 5/11 gap on a significant contraction in volume was a false breakdown that will be reversed in time. C – The retest of the 5/5 gap on decreasing volume suggests that the downside force is waning. Whatever canno...


Got Gold Report - COT Flash May 21

Posted: 23 May 2010 06:07 PM PDT

Bottom line: COT report shows COMEX commercials not aggressive on the sell side for gold, but the largest hedgers and short sellers hammer silver futures ahead of silver plunge.Gold -0.6% and the gold LCNS -1%. Silver -1.5% and the silver LCNS zooms higher 12.8%.Details just below. ATLANTA – From the sidelines with our short-term gold-silver ammunition, but glad we hold physical metal in our longer-term arsenal, we peer into a small window of the largest traders of gold and silver futures with this special report. With the violence of the past week, both in the equity markets and in precious metals, it was easy to be anxious to get our hands on the COT data below. We don’t like being in port when there is good fishing going on. But we like violent and uncertain markets less and less as what’s left of the topside hair gets grayer. Last week’s study into the COT produced a kind of curve ball, because it suggested to those of us who fo...


Got Gold Report – Caution Flags Still Flying for Gold, Silver

Posted: 23 May 2010 06:01 PM PDT

We just wonder now whether we are about to enter the eye of the storm or the eye wall itself. Meaning, we cannot yet see enough confirmation in the data to give us comfort to set up on the short-term trading long side of our beloved precious metals – just yet. No matter how much we are itching to do just that.


America’s Wealthiest 25 percent of Households own 87 percent of all U.S. Wealth

Posted: 23 May 2010 05:29 PM PDT


A true measure of economic vitality is measured by wealth.  We can look at incomesor other measures of productivity but real wealth is measured by net worth.  Who controls wealth in the U.S.?  According to a study from the Joint Center for Housing Studies the top 25% of U.S. households control 87% of all wealth in the country.  That number comes out to a nice hefty sum of $54.2 trillion.  If we look even closer at income distribution, we will find that the top 1 percent in our country control 42 percentof all financial wealth.  By all measures being able to acquire a piece of financial wealth was the hallmark of the middle class of previous years.
Today we have a society largely in debt to credit cards, auto loans, student loans, and immense mortgage debt.  Net worth is measured by looking at assets minus liabilities and many Americans are lucky to break even while many have a negative net worth.
Even after the current wealth destruction of the recession, our country has grown wealthier and wealthier over time and the trend is clear:
Source:  Wikipedia
Yet more and more of this added wealth is filtering its way to a smaller group and not necessarily the most productive in our country.  In the first quarter of 2010 some of the biggest banks in this country made continuous profits without really adding any benefit to our economy or society:
Source:  ABC News
In fact, many of these banks simply made money by hoarding money and actually lending it back to the U.S. government (who actually bailed them out to begin with).  These weren't successful companies that produced a solid product.  These are the companies that failed but had politically bought out the right connections.  


China to lend out its massive foreign exchange reserves

Posted: 23 May 2010 04:42 PM PDT

Looks like China aims to exchange more dollars for resources in the ground.

* * *

China is tapping its deep well of foreign reserves for overseas resource loans, benefiting banks through a major policy shift

By Zhang Yuzhe
Caixin Online, Beijing
Thursday, May 20, 2010

http://english.caing.com/2010-05-20/100145743.html

BEIJING -- The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) is leading a policy adjustment that taps China's huge stash of foreign reserves for overseas loans through commercial banks.

Under an evolving reform project launched in recent months, SAFE has taken initial steps toward giving policy and commercial banks authority to handle loans for intergovernmental cooperation projects.

Major loan-for-oil swaps signed in recent months by China and several other countries marked a coming-out for the new policy.

Dispatch continues below ...



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy Resource Corp. Appoints Rob McEwen to Advisory Board

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX.V: PCY, OTC: PCYRF) is pleased to announce the appointment of Rob McEwen to the company's Advisory Board. McEwen is a leading Canadian mining industry entrepreneur. He is the chairman and CEO of U.S. Gold Corp. and Minera Andes Inc. McEwen was the founder and former chairman and CEO of Goldcorp Inc., whose Red Lake Mine in northwestern Ontario, Canada, is considered to be the richest gold mine in the world. During his tenure at Goldcorp, McEwen transformed the company from a collection of small companies into a mining powerhouse, growing its market capitalization from $50 million to approximately $8 billion.

For Prophecy Resource Corp.'s complete statement:

http://www.prophecyresource.com/news_2010_mar11b.php



The adjustments are designed to help China diversify its foreign currency assets and provide a channel for some of the US$ 2.4 trillion in reserves held by the central bank.

The reforms also expanded SAFE's responsibilities beyond its traditional role of managing foreign exchange reserves, effectively turning the agency into a foreign currency lender.

The new forex direction dates from the end of last year, when the State Council asked SAFE to take the lead in projects including a Chinese loan-for-Russian oil exchange deal. The agency was also told to study additional innovations for policy lending.

Meanwhile, SAFE has been looking at ways in which domestic financial institutions can cooperate through various loan programs to help Chinese enterprises expand abroad.

Since 2009 China has signed loan-for-oil agreements worth more US$60 billion in recent months with Russia, Venezuela, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and other countries. Altogether, these agreements have given China the rights to import nearly 75 million tons of crude oil every year.

Under the China-Russia bilateral agreement signed February 17, for example, China will provide Russia US$25 billion in long-term loans in exchange for 15 million tons of crude oil annually between 2011 and 2030.

The agreements put China's forex pool to work at a relatively young age: The nation's foreign reserves have grown substantially since the country joined the World Trade Organization in 2002.

Before that, forex reserves growth was less than US$50 billion a year. But the growth rate soon jumped to an average 33 percent per year.

The central bank's forex holdings have doubled to today's US$2.4 trillion from the US$1.2 trillion on hand in September 2007, when the government created an overseas investment arm, China Investment Corp.

The current cash stash is far more than the government technically requires, giving policymakers a key reason to pursue policy lending. In theory, the central bank is required to retain only enough foreign currency assets with strong liquidity to handle three months of imports and short-term external debt. A reasonable upper limit for meeting this requirement now would be US$600 billion.

Moreover, the central bank is interested in the policy loan project because it is actively pursuing safe, profitable investment channels for forex reserves.

After getting its recent marching orders from the State Council, SAFE's first step was to sign an agreement with China Development Bank Corp. (CDB) to handle so-called "entrusted loans." The deal gave CDB authority to act as SAFE's agent for overseas investment loans, primarily to Chinese enterprises that go abroad.

An entrusted loan is a three-party credit tool in China in which one non-bank entity lends to another through a cooperating bank. These are off-balance sheet transactions, and the bank receives representative fees that count as intermediate business income.

Since SAFE lacks risk management capacities, such as pre- and post-loan appraisals, risk control for entrusted loans largely depend on cooperating banks such as CDB. That means "banks are essentially working for SAFE, and interest margins from foreign currency financing projects will be directly handed over to SAFE," said a commercial bank source, who added these deals include a degree of moral hazard.

Based on the "basic strategic intent" of the government, "this model has some definite benefits," said one financial expert. "Still, under this new model, SAFE will be forced to take on even greater risk responsibility."

And that raises a warning flag about government policy direction. "China's biggest problem is that all the risk is concentrating toward the government," the expert said.

SAFE's first pick for entrusted loan projects was CDB, which took the lead in arranging many of the latest oil deals. The two agencies signed an agreement that divides overseas investments into new and old projects. CDB agreed to a commission range between 1 and 2 percent for new projects.

Most of CDB's international operations last year involved loans-for-resources projects, including 10-year oil deals worth more than US$ 10 billion with countries including Russia, Brazil, and Venezuela. CDB also took the lead in syndicated loans with other banks.

Not everyone at CDB is happy with the policy program. A CDB source said the bank is currently in a transition period and should expand its fund reserves for long-term, stable profits. The source said the "1 to 2 percent commission" promised by SAFE "is not high" compared with profit margins from regular loans.

The new lending model also will affect cost budgeting and risk management at CDB, the source said. "The entrustment agreement between SAFE and CDB allows SAFE to directly take on new projects," the source said. "SAFE will act as the organizer and primary arranger of syndicated loans."

"CDB is taking on some operations that have a relation to policy lending," said a source at the government investment arm Central Huijin Investment Ltd. "Under the current system, one may well say that this model opens up a new path. "However, it is still only suitable as a transitional arrangement."

One reason for the program's temporary nature is that the government is assuming risk.

But some banks are not complaining. Off-balance sheet operations protect banks from risk, said a source at Bank of China, a state-run commercial bank. Another plus is that SAFE's entrusted loan model can give banks access to additional foreign currency capital, the source said.

Moreover, the model "does not take capital, reduces pressure on capital and allows banks to earn a simple commission fee," the source continued. "Hence, the merits outweigh the drawbacks."

As for drawbacks, a China Eximbank source said the entrusted loan model raises the possibility of moral hazard. And SAFE assumes all risk as lender and interest payment beneficiary.

"Allowing SAFE to collect interest margins means the main source of profits belongs to SAFE," a commercial bank source said, before raising a crucial question: "In this case, who would take primary responsibility for post-loan management and risk?"

By taking on risk, one financial expert said, SAFE is now stepping out from behind the scenes to the center of China's financial stage.

"The biggest risk involved with overseas investment projects is country risk," the Eximbank source said. "Loan amounts for medium- to long-term loans overseas are huge and limited to one country. Hence, the risk is relatively concentrated."

* * *

Join GATA here:

World Resource Investment Conference
Sunday and Monday, June 6 and 7, 2010
Vancouver Convention Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
http://www.cambridgehouse.ca/index.php/world-resource-investment-confere...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Coming Friday-Sunday, June 11-13, at the Dallas-Fort Worth Airport Marriot:
The Anglo Far-East Bullion Co.'s Gold and Silver Conference

The conference will explore the dangers and opportunities in today's bullion markets and the need for investors to diversify bullion holdings outside of bullion banking and commodities markets. Speakers will include David Morgan of Silver-Investor.com, Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Chairman Bill Murphy, and Duncan Cameron and Philip Judge of Anglo Far-East Bullion Co. The earliest conference attendees on Saturday will be able to schedule one-on-one interviews for personal consultation with Anglo-Far East's experts on Sunday.

To learn more about and register for the Anglo Far-East Bullion conference, please visit:

http://www.anglofareast.com/seminar-registration/



High Inflation in the U.K. Worries Bank of England

Posted: 23 May 2010 04:20 PM PDT

Dr. Duru submits:

(This is a adapted repost from Inflation Watch)

Bank of England (BoE) Monetary Policy Committee Member Adam Posen tells CNBC in an interview (see below or click here) that stubbornly high inflation is keeping the Bank of England members up at night. However, Posen prefers this situation to deflation (as all central bankers would). Slack in resource utilization is not having the same dampening effect it is having in other industrialized countries like the U.S. I would think the steady decline in the British pound has a lot to do with the high inflation rate, but Posen claims it is not a sufficient explanation. Note well that this depreciation is essentially what the BoE, or at least Mervyn King, has desired to kickstart economic growth in the UK through higher exports, lower consumption of foreign goods, and higher domestic demand.


Complete Story »


The Big Picture: Why Is It So Hard to Stop the Oil Gusher, and Why Was Such Extreme Deepwater Drilling Allowed in the First Place?

Posted: 23 May 2010 04:20 PM PDT

Washington’s Blog

 

The government failed to properly ensure that BP used adequate safety measures, BP and their contractors were criminally negligent for the oil spill, and BP has tried to cover up the problem. See this.

But why hasn't BP stopped the leak?

Some people assume that BP hasn't stopped the oil leak because it's people are wholly incompetent.

Others have asked whether BP's $75 million liability cap is motivating it to stall by taking half-hearted measures until it's relief well drilling is complete.

But there is another possible explanation: the geology at the drilling site makes stopping the leak more difficult than people realize.

Does the Geology of the Spill Zone Make It Harder to Stop the Oil Spill?

We can't understand the big picture behind the Gulf oil spill unless we know the underwater geology of the seabed and the underlying rocks.

For example, if there is solid rock beneath the leaking pipes, with channels leading to other underground spaces, then it might be possible to seal the whole spill zone, with the oil - hopefully - oozing somewhere under the seabed so that it won't spill into the ocean.

If, on the other hand, there is hundreds of feet of sand or mud beneath the leaking pipes, then sealing the spill zone might not work, as the high-pressure oil gusher would just leak out somewhere else.

BP has never publicly released geological cross-sections of the seabed and underlying rock. BP's Initial Exploration Plan refers to "structure contour maps" and "geological cross sections", but such drawings and information are designated "proprietary information" and have been kept under wraps.

It is impossible to determine the geology from drawings publicly released by BP, such as this one:


However, Roger Anderson and Albert Boulanger of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory describe the basic geology of the oil-rich parts of the Gulf:

Production in the deepwater province is centered in turbidite sands recently deposited from the Mississippi delta. Even more prolific rates have been recorded in the carbonates of Mexico, with the Golden Lane and Campeche reporting 100,000 barrel per day production from single wells. However, most of the deep and ultra-deepwater Gulf of Mexico is covered by the Sigsbee salt sheet that forms a large, near-surface “moonscape” culminating at the edge of the continental slope in an 800 meter high escarpment.

 

***

 

Salt is the dominant structural element of the ultra-deepwater Gulf of Mexico petroleum system. Large horizontal salt sheets, driven by the huge Plio-Pleistocene to Oligocene sediment dump of the Mississippi, Rio Grande and other Gulf Coast Rivers, dominate the slope to the Sigsbee escarpment. Salt movement is recorded by large, stepped, counter-regional growth faults and down-to-the-basin fault systems soling into evacuated salt surfaces. Horizontal velocities of salt movement to the south are in the several cm/year range, making this supposedly passive margin as tectonically active as most plate boundaries.

 

***

 

Porosities over 30 percent and permeabilities greater than one darcy in deepwater turbidite reservoirs have been commonly cited. Compaction and diagenesis of deepwater reservoir sands are minimal because of relatively recent and rapid sedimentation. Sands at almost 20,000 feet in the auger field (Garden Banks 426) still retain a porosity of 26% and a permeability of almost 350mdarcies. Pliocene and Pleistocene turbidite sands in the Green Canyon 205 field have reported porosities ranging from 28 to 32% with permeabilities between 400 mdarcies and 3 darcies. Connectivity in sheet sands and amalgamated sheet and channel sands is high for deepwater turbidite reservoirs and recovery efficiencies are in the 40-60% range.

See also this.

The BP oil spill leak is occurring in the "Macondo" Prospect, Block 252, in the Mississippi Canyon Area of the Gulf (much of the oil-rich areas under the Gulf are in the Mississippi Canyon and Fan areas: "In the central Gulf of Mexico, the Mississippi Canyon and Fan system is the dominant morphologic feature").

If the geology at Block 252 of the Macondo Prospect is like that described by Anderson and Boulanger for most of the oil-rich portion of the Gulf, then it might be difficult to stop the oil gusher without completing relief wells (which will take a couple of months).

Specifically, if there are salt layers on the top of the seabed, with high porosity near the surface, and salt movement, then sealing the whole leak zone might not work. The oil pressure is coming up at such high pressures (more than 2,000 pounds per square inch), that sealing the leaking riser and blowout preventer might just mean the oil squirts out somewhere else nearby, if the salty, porous rock is not solid enough to contain it.

Unless the government releases details of the geology underlying the spill site, people will not have an accurate picture of the oil spill situation. And failure to release such information may prevent creative scientists from coming up with a workable solution.

The first draft of Anderson and Boulanger's paper, in 2001, stated:

No means currently exists to produce oil and gas to market from such water depths!

(exclamation point is Anderson and Boulanger's).

If the geology at Block 252 is like that described by Anderson and Boulanger for most of the oil-rich portion of the Gulf, then it might be difficult to stop the oil gusher without completing relief wells (which will take a couple of months).

Specifically, if there are salt layers right under the sea floor, high porosity near the surface or salt movement, then sealing the leak by plugging the risers and blowout preventer might not work. The oil pressure is coming up at such high pressures (more than 2,000 pounds per square inch), that sealing the leaking equipment at the level of the seabed might just mean the oil will flow out somewhere else nearby.

The government must publicly release details of the geology under the spill site. Until it does so, people will not have be understand what is going on. And failing to release such information may prevent creative scientists from around the world from coming up with a workable solution.

In addition, the first draft of Anderson and Boulanger's paper - released in 2001 - stated:

No means currently exists to produce oil and gas to market from such water depths!

(exclamation point is Anderson and Boulanger's).

In other words, while BP, its subcontractors, and the government were all negligent with regard to the Deepwater Horizon operation, it should be noted that drilling at such depths is new technology, operating in largely uncharted conditions. As such, the dangers of deepwater drilling in general should not be underestimated. The geology of the oil-rich region in the Gulf makes drilling difficult, and oil spills appear to be tough to contain in general.

Oil Is Considered A National Security Issue

So why are oil companies being allowed to drill so deeply under the Gulf in the first place? In other words, why has the government been so supportive of deepwater drilling in the Gulf?

The answer - as Anderson and Boulanger note - is that there is a tremendous amount of more oil deep under the Gulf, and that the United States government considers oil drilling in the deep waters of the Gulf as a national security priority:

The oil and gas industry and the United States government both face tremendous challenges to explore discover, appraise, develop, and exploit vast new hydrocarbon reserves in waters deeper than 6000 feet in the ultra-deepwater of the Gulf of Mexico. Yet these new reserves of hydrocarbons are needed to offset the economically detrimental, long-term decline in production from within the borders of the United States

***

If successfully developed, the new play concept would fill an essential gap in the overall strategic defenses of the United States by decreasing the gap that results in the nation's dependence on foreign oil and gas reserves in this volatile and hostile, post 9/11 world. However, the successful production of oil and gas from this new carbonate play concept requires much more cost-efficient evaluation and appraisal technologies than exist today to economically conduct exploration, appraisal, and development activities. These new technologies must be developed before production can be practical in the ultra-deepwater operating environment.... The Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Gas Trust Fund of the DOE has as its mission to cut costs and time-to-market not incrementally, but radically, so that the United States can optimally utilize these strategic hydrocarbon reserves. The DOE, with extensive industry,academic and non-governmental assistance, developed an Offshore Technology Roadmap ...,

***

The U. S. Energy Bill of 2002 has allocated significant resources to fund innovative industry, academic, and national laboratory research initiatives to develop the new technologies necessary to explore and produce these new ultra-deepwater reserves economically. The purpose is not only to impact the national defense, but also to regain our international technological leadership in the deepwater, recently lost to the Brazilians, Norwegians, and Europeans.

***
Congress, never a big friend to energy interests, has acted to create the Ultra-deepwater Trust Fund that would add an astounding $200 billion by 2017, if successful at developing the new production technologies required.

So the Department of Energy and Congress have committed to development of the deepwater Gulf oil reserves in the name of national security. This also helps explain why Obama has been pro-drilling in the Gulf.

But let's take a step back and ask why the government considers oil a national security priority in the first place?

Well, the U.S. military is the largest consumer of oil in the world. As NPR reported in 2007:

 

All the U.S. tanks, planes and ships guzzle 340,000 barrels of oil a day, making the American military the single-largest purchaser and consumer of oil in the world.

 

If the Defense Department were a country, it would rank about 38th in the world for oil consumption, right behind the Philippines.

As Reuters pointed out in 2008:

U.S. military fuel consumption dwarfs energy demand in many countries around the world, adding up to nearly double the fuel use in Ireland and 20 times more than that of Iceland, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.

And as I summarized last year:

Sara Flounders writes:

 

By every measure, the Pentagon is the largest institutional user of petroleum products and energy in general. Yet the Pentagon has a blanket exemption in all international climate agreements.

 

***

 

The Feb. 17, 2007, Energy Bulletin detailed the oil consumption just for the Pentagon's aircraft, ships, ground vehicles and facilities that made it the single-largest oil consumer in the world.

 

***

 

Even according to rankings in the 2006 CIA World Factbook, only 35 countries (out of 210 in the world) consume more oil per day than the Pentagon.

 

***

 

As I pointed out out last week:

Professor Michael Klare noted in 2007:

Sixteen gallons of oil. That's how much the average American soldier in Iraq and Afghanistan consumes on a daily basis -- either directly, through the use of Humvees, tanks, trucks, and helicopters, or indirectly, by calling in air strikes. Multiply this figure by 162,000 soldiers in Iraq, 24,000 in Afghanistan, and 30,000 in the surrounding region (including sailors aboard U.S. warships in the Persian Gulf) and you arrive at approximately 3.5 million gallons of oil: the daily petroleum tab for U.S. combat operations in the Middle East war zone.
And in 2008, Oil Change International released a report showing that [b]etween March 2003 and October 2007 the US military in Iraq purchased more than 4 billion gallons of fuel from the Defense Energy Support Center, the agency responsible for procuring and supplying petroleum products to the Department of Defense.

Indeed, Alan Greenspan, John McCain, George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, a high-level National Security Council officer and others all say that the Iraq war was really about oil.

Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz says that the Iraq war alone will cost $3-5 trillion dollars.

And economist Anita Dancs writes:

Each year, our military devotes substantial resources to securing access to and safeguarding the transportation of oil and other energy sources. I estimate that we will pay $90 billion this year to secure oil. If spending on the Iraq War is included, the total rises to $166 billion.

Are you starting to get the picture?

In addition, experts say that the Iraq war has increased the threat of terrorism. See this, this, this, this, this, this and this.

Personally, I strongly believe that it is vital for our national security - and our economy - to switch from dependence on oil to a basket of alternative energies. As I pointed out Friday:

It's not just the one BP oil rig. For example, since the Deepwater Horizon oil drilling rig exploded on April 20th, the Obama administration has granted oil and gas companies at least 27 exemptions from doing in-depth environmental studies of oil exploration and production in the Gulf of Mexico. Then there are the 12 new oil and gas drilling rigs launched in the U.S. this week.

And a whistleblower who survived the Gulf oil explosion claims in a lawsuit that BP's operations at another oil platform risk another catastrophic accident that could "dwarf" the Gulf oil spill, partly because BP never even reviewed critical engineering designs for the operation. And see this.

***

 

And the Department of Defense also apparently has some issues with extensive off-shore drilling for security reasons.

 

Many still believe that alternative energy is an expensive, unrealistic pipe dream.

But that is no longer necessarily true, especially when the externalities of environmental and military costs are taken into account.

But existing national policy is to do whatever is necessary - drilling deep under the Gulf and launching our military abroad - to secure oil. Until we change our national security and energy policies, future mishaps - environmental, military and economic - may frequently occur.

H/t: Rusty Shorts.


So long guys.

Posted: 23 May 2010 03:46 PM PDT

Was told it will be difficult to post at GIM. I guessing people want me to stop posting so they can have just one idea. I know how thought police work.
Good luck with your Gold.


Silver Market Update

Posted: 23 May 2010 03:09 PM PDT

Although gold and silver dropped quite sharply last week, longer-term charts reveal that nothing broke technically and the reactions were in fact within normal parameters, and the reaction in silver was actually quite modest ... Read More...



Guest Post: US State Department Says "Conspiracy Theories Exist In The Realm Of Myth"

Posted: 23 May 2010 02:52 PM PDT

Submitted by Mac Slavo of www.SHTFplan.com

The US State Department’s America.gov web site, which purports to engage international audiences on issues of foreign policy, society and values, has dedicated a special section to conspiracy theories and misinformation, claiming:

“Conspiracy theories exist in the realm of myth, where imaginations run wild, fears trump facts, and evidence is ignored. As a superpower, the United States is often cast as a villain in these dramas.”

Some of the conspiratorial myths “officially” debunked by the State Department include:

The US military’s use of depleted uranium in combat and comparing this to radioactivity from detonations of nuclear weapons.

“Uranium evokes very powerful fears. It is associated with atomic weapons, mass annihilation, radiation sickness, cancer and birth defects. Depleted uranium evokes these same fears, despite the fact that it has been depleted of much of its radioactivity. Even if you accept this fact, your fear-based associations can be more powerful than logic and facts. Compare how you feel about tungsten to how you feel about depleted uranium. Both are heavy metals, but “depleted uranium” might sound scarier to you.”

Never mind that the World Health Organization says that depleted uranium is weakly radioactive and a radiation dose from it would be about 60% of that from purified natural uranium with the same mass. It’s only 60% as radioactive as the real stuff, so it’s safe to use in weapons systems we’re lobbing into neighborhoods in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The employment of economic hit men to entrap countries in huge amounts of debt.

“Economic conspiracy theories are often based on the false, but popular, idea that powerful individuals are motivated overwhelmingly by their desire for wealth, rather than the wide variety of human motivations we all experience. (This one-dimensional, cartoonish view of human nature is at the heart of Marxist ideology, which once held hundreds of millions under its sway.)”

“One fantasy, reflecting this simplistic, unimaginative way of interpreting human events, falsely claims that U.S. national security agencies employ “economic hit men” to entrap countries with huge amounts of debt.”

“Within the United States, those who fear international influences may believe false stories that, with Canada and Mexico, the United States is replacing the dollar with a new “Amero” currency, patterned after the Euro, or that the United States is sacrificing its sovereignty to an imaginary “North American Union.”

Two words: Goldman Sachs. [ZH: we also recommend reading Confessions of an Economic Hitman for the truth on this matter]

And, while the Amero may not be a reality now, there is only one way that the United States is going to pay off the national debt that our domestic economic hit men have strapped us with, and this is through either devaluation or all out default. In both cases the US dollar as we know it today will be completely destroyed and a new currency system will be required. Call it a theory, we think it’s fact, and if they’re doing it to our own country, why would they not do it to third-world foreigners?

The State Department has also made efforts to debunk the myth that President Obama is not a US citizen.

“Today, some conspiracy theorists falsely claim President Obama was not born in the United States, making him ineligible to be president. However, there is no doubt that he was born in Hawaii.”

There may be no doubt in the minds of those appointed to their posts by President Obama or those hired to write the State Departments debunking blogs, but millions of Americans question the President’s eligibility to serve for a number of reasons that include his failure to provide a legitimate Certificate of Live Birth issued by the State of Hawaii, his inability to explain his trip to Pakistan in the 1980’s when holders of US passports were not allowed into the country, and most recently, his use of a social security number issued only for residents of the State of Connecticut, in which he never lived.

No government debunking of conspiracy myths would be complete without discussion of September 11th:

Dramatic, polarizing events often give rise to conspiracy theories, and the September 11 attacks were the most dramatic terrorist attacks in history. Nonsense about them abounds, especially in the popular video “Loose Change.”

See “The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories” for an overview. There was no “controlled demolition” of the World Trade Center towers. Instead, the unprecedented attack by hijacked airliners full of jet fuel destroyed support pillars, loosened fireproofing insulation, and ignited fires that destroyed the twin towers. The collapse of the north tower heavily damaged World Trade Center 7, igniting fires and causing its collapse.

A hijacked plane, not a cruise missile, hit the Pentagon, as detailed in a photo gallery. Four thousand Jews did not miss work at the World Trade Center on September 11. And al-Qaida has admitted, many times, that it carried out the attacks.

At the risk of sounding like Debra Medina Truthers, we’ll refrain from arguing every point, however we’d like to point out to those of our readers who have not yet viewed the popular video “Loose Change,” that they take the time to do so before swallowing this nine sentence so-called debunking of the largest crime in American history.

If nothing else, we’d suggest to readers that there are many questions that went unanswered about 9/11 which include, but are not limited to, over fifty (50) missing closed circuit videos around the Pentagon that were never released to the public and the fact the Osama Bin Laden was never officially implicated for his role in the September 11th WTC plot.

A couple of conspiracies which were considered myths at the time of their occurrence, yet were not debunked by the State Department’s new web site include the Gulf of Tonkin incident which lead to the Vietnam war and the CIA drug transportation rings of the 1980’s. Because of the overwhelming evidence that was uncovered by independent researchers and reluctantly released by the government, these myths and fantasies eventually became realities.

We wonder if the US government may be rushing to judgment about wild imaginations and irrational fears when they have failed to answer simple questions regarding many of the conspiracy “theories” above. Naturally, many of these will remain theories until the facts are openly provided to those requesting the information, at which point they will either be conspiracy fact or non-truths.

For the time being, those who seek the truth will likely remain baffled, confused and misdirected, much like the magic bullet that killed JFK, because any good conspiracy creates a web of illegible disinformation and misinformation, not from those looking for answers, but by those who have the power to provide them.

“What is it men cannot be made to believe!”
Thomas Jefferson
April 22, 1786

 


Goldman's FX Clients Getting Tactically Bombed On Daily Basis Now

Posted: 23 May 2010 02:11 PM PDT

The latest tactical nuking of whatever remaining clients GS has in the FX (or any) arena has just been announced: from GS FX research "Stopped out of short USD/TWD with a potential loss of -1.2% May 24, 2010. We were stopped out of our tactical recommendation to be short USD/TWD at the London close on Friday with a potential loss of around -1.2%. We initiated the trade on 31 March on the back of strong macro data out of Taiwan and rising inflation which we expected the Taiwan central bank to fight via a stronger currency. While the macro arguments for the trade are still in place and the trade was well on its way towards the target a few weeks ago, the ongoing market jitters have pushed $/TWD a fraction past our stop of 32.1."

For god's sake Goldman, have some pity on your clients.


GSR Bottoming, now what?

Posted: 23 May 2010 02:02 PM PDT


With all the tedious micromanagement of the gold-silver ratio (GSR) that has gone on here, all the 'talking in riddles' and vague concepts, what is the actual meaning behind things?

Damned if I know… I am going to leave the great questions to be answered by the great minds. Is this the end of the financial world as we know it? It should be, given that it is built on lies upon lies. But here in Wonderland, things don't usually work out as they 'should', now do they?

So I will just continue to specialize in my own little corner of the vast, wheezing Ponzi scheme on the verge of meltdown. Our junk bond to investment grade bond indicator has come in… sentiment has come in… VIX, US Dollar… all in. Then there is the big daddy of my personal investment (and investment avoidance) stance, the GSR.

Of particular interest to me is the GSR's relationship to the gold mining sector. Now, this is a free blog and I gladly share some general things, but it is now getting serious and the serious focus must remain for the people who pay for it, in the newsletter. The time for fooling around with the Hope '09 (and Full Hubris '10) stupidity is at an end. As a bottom feeder and a buyer of peoples' misery and misperception I must now get on the job.

Meanwhile, here is a chart of the GSR and its longer term correlation with HUI. Draw some conclusions (among them that gold stocks can get royally hammered even as the rising GSR indicates rising gold miner fundamentals), have patience and turn down the noise; that would be the harangues of the inflationists and now, increasingly the deflationists as well.

Time to begin sorting through the debris, with patience and perspective. There, how's that for a riddle?

Source:  http://www.biiwii.blogspot.com/


Is The Euro and The Rally In Gold Over?

Posted: 23 May 2010 01:37 PM PDT

Countries bailed out the banks. Now who is left to bail out the countries? While the decline in the euro appears to be very close to being over, the fundamental situation of the Eurozone still appears to be ... Read More...



How to Trade Market Bottoms for SP500 & Gold

Posted: 23 May 2010 01:13 PM PDT


The stock market topped in April which was expected from analyzing stocks and the indexes. Back in April I posted a few reports explaining how to read the charts to spot market tops. Today's report is about identifying market bottoms.

It does not get much more exciting than what we have seen in the past 2 months with the market topping in April and the May 6th mini market crash. This Thursday we saw panic selling which pushed the market below the May 6th low washing the market of weak positions.

For those of you who have been following me closely this year I am sure you have noticed trading has been a little slower than normal. This is due to the fact that the market corrected at the beginning of the year and we went long Feb 5th and again on Feb 25th. Since then the market rallied for 2 months and never provided another low risk entry point. In April the market became choppy and toppy and we eventually took a short position to ride the market down. Now were we are looking at another possible reversal to the upside.

Only a few trades this year which I know frustrates some individuals but if you step back and look at my trading strategy you will learn that we only need to trade a few trades a year to make some solid returns. I don't know about you but I would rather trade a few times a month and live life between trades… not trade all day every day getting bug eyed in front of the computer.

Ok enough of the boring stuff let's get into the charts…

SP500 – Stock Market Index Trading ETFs & Futures

The pullback in the broad market was expected but the mini crash on May 6th really through a wrench into things for us technical analysts. We don't really know the truth about what happened that day… was it just a simple error or was it a planned error for the US government to take a massive short position to move something in their favor quickly to generate MASSIVE gains? It leaves us technicians hanging wondering if that was a shift in trend from up (accumulation) to down (distribution)?

My thoughts are if the crash was truly an error then we will see months if not another year of higher prices… But if it was a planned sell off with banks moving to the sidelines then we are most likely headed into another bear market. Personally it does not matter what happens as big money will be made in either direction. Problem is if we do go into another bear market then the majority of individuals will lose capital as investor's portfolios get smaller and smaller. That will lead to a lot of depressed people…

In short, I am neutral on the stock market for the intermediate and long term. Once we have a few more months of price action only then will I have a plan for longer term investments. But on the short term time frame the market is screaming at me with extreme sentiment levels lining up on the stock market and gold.

The daily chart of the SPY – SP500 Index shows several important points which help me time market bottoms. We have prices trading at a support zone. Buyers step back into the game here and should provide a decent bounce which started Friday Morning.

Next we have the panic selling spikes from an indicator I created. Generally the day after we see panic in the market like we did on Thursday we will see a big bounce and many times a large rally.

Down at the bottom you can see my custom market cycles which are both starting to bottom. During times like this the market has a natural tendency to move higher.

VIX – Market Volatility Daily Chart

The VIX has an old saying "When the VIX is high its time to buy, When the VIX is low, its time to go".  Simple analysis clearly shows the VIX trading high and at a resistance zone.

Put/Call Ratio – Daily Trading Chart

This chart measures the amount of put and call options traded each day. When it is trading over 1.00 then we know for every 1 call option traded (wanting the market to go up) there is 1 put option traded (wanting the market to go down). Over 1.00 is extreme and when that many people are bearish and using leverage to profit from a drop in price then in my opinion it means everyone has already sold and the selling pressure is about to end.

Actually if you go back in time and review SP500 and this ratio you will notice 2-3 days after this ratio reaches 1.00 or higher the market bounces/bottoms.

NYSE Advance/Decline Line for Equities – Daily Chart

This chart shows us how many stocks are advancing or declining on any given day. When extremes are reached look for a short term bounce or bottom 1-3 days following.

How to Identify Stock Market Bottoms with Simple Analysis:

In short, I feel the market is forming a bottom here. How big of a rally will we get? I don't know because of the mixed signals from the May 6th EXTREME heavy volume selling session. As usual I focus on trading with the trend, trading the low risk setups and I manage my money/positions scaling in and out of those positions as I see fit.

If you would like to receive my Real-Time Trading Signals & Trading Education check out my website at www.FuturesTradingSignals.com

Chris Vermeulen



Guest Post: How To Trade Market Bottoms For SP500 And Gold

Posted: 23 May 2010 01:06 PM PDT

Submitted by Chris Vermeulen, of www.TheGoldAndOilGuy.com

The stock market topped in April which was expected from analyzing stocks and the indexes. Back in April I posted a few reports explaining how to read the charts to spot market tops. Today’s report is about identifying market bottoms.

It does not get much more exciting than what we have seen in the past 2 months with the market topping in April and the May 6th mini market crash. This Thursday we saw panic selling which pushed the market below the May 6th low washing the market of weak positions.

For those of you who have been following me closely this year I am sure you have noticed trading has been a little slower than normal. This is due to the fact that the market corrected at the beginning of the year and we went long Feb 5th and again on Feb 25th. Since then the market rallied for 2 months and never provided another low risk entry point. In April the market became choppy and toppy and we eventually took a short position to ride the market down. Now were we are looking at another possible reversal to the upside.

Only a few trades this year which I know frustrates some individuals but if you step back and look at my trading strategy you will learn that we only need to trade a few trades a year to make some solid returns. I don’t know about you but I would rather trade a few times a month and live life between trades… not trade all day every day getting bug eyed in front of the computer.

Ok enough of the boring stuff let’s get into the charts…

SP500 – Stock Market Index Trading ETFs & Futures

The pullback in the broad market was expected but the mini crash on May 6th really through a wrench into things for us technical analysts. We don’t really know the truth about what happened that day… was it just a simple error or was it a planned error for the US government to take a massive short position to move something in their favor quickly to generate MASSIVE gains? It leaves us technicians hanging wondering if that was a shift in trend from up (accumulation) to down (distribution)?

My thoughts are if the crash was truly an error then we will see months if not another year of higher prices… But if it was a planned sell off with banks moving to the sidelines then we are most likely headed into another bear market. Personally it does not matter what happens as big money will be made in either direction. Problem is if we do go into another bear market then the majority of individuals will lose capital as investor’s portfolios get smaller and smaller. That will lead to a lot of depressed people…

In short, I am neutral on the stock market for the intermediate and long term. Once we have a few more months of price action only then will I have a plan for longer term investments. But on the short term time frame the market is screaming at me with extreme sentiment levels lining up on the stock market and gold.

The daily chart of the SPY – SP500 Index shows several important points which help me time market bottoms. We have prices trading at a support zone. Buyers step back into the game here and should provide a decent bounce which started Friday Morning.

Next we have the panic selling spikes from an indicator I created. Generally the day after we see panic in the market like we did on Thursday we will see a big bounce and many times a large rally.

Down at the bottom you can see my custom market cycles which are both starting to bottom. During times like this the market has a natural tendency to move higher.

VIX – Market Volatility Daily Chart

The VIX has an old saying “When the VIX is high its time to buy, When the VIX is low, its time to go”.  Simple analysis clearly shows the VIX trading high and at a resistance zone.

Put/Call Ratio – Daily Trading Chart

This chart measures the amount of put and call options traded each day. When it is trading over 1.00 then we know for every 1 call option traded (wanting the market to go up) there is 1 put option traded (wanting the market to go down). Over 1.00 is extreme and when that many people are bearish and using leverage to profit from a drop in price then in my opinion it means everyone has already sold and the selling pressure is about to end.

Actually if you go back in time and review SP500 and this ratio you will notice 2-3 days after this ratio reaches 1.00 or higher the market bounces/bottoms.

NYSE Advance/Decline Line for Equities – Daily Chart

This chart shows us how many stocks are advancing or declining on any given day. When extremes are reached look for a short term bounce or bottom 1-3 days following.

How to Identify Stock Market Bottoms with Simple Analysis:

In short, I feel the market is forming a bottom here. How big of a rally will we get? I don’t know because of the mixed signals from the May 6th EXTREME heavy volume selling session. As usual I focus on trading with the trend, trading the low risk setups and I manage my money/positions scaling in and out of those positions as I see fit.

If you would like to receive my Real-Time Trading Signals & Trading Education check out my website at www.FuturesTradingSignals.com


Liquidity in Europe Hesitates

Posted: 23 May 2010 12:50 PM PDT

If you're a glass half-full kind of guy, then Friday's action in stock was encouraging. Here in Australia, the indexes opened up down by almost three per cent. Yet by the end of the day, they were able to claw their way back to much smaller losses. Yes, stocks are at nine-month lows. But it felt like a victory, didn't it?

Then, in Friday's U.S. session stocks staged a huge final hour rally. The Dow Jones industrials had been down below 10,000 at one point. But in a flash (a flash dash!) the index suddenly reversed itself and finished 1.24% higher. So what does that tell us?

Absolutely nothing, most likely. In a market like this, what you don't know is a lot more important than what you do know. And what we do know turns out to be very little anyway. Just based on valuations, stocks are now a bit cheaper than they were a month ago. But price is not the same thing as value.

And besides, there are so many known unknowns and unknown unknowns it's hard to know where to begin! But let's start on the other side of the world and tackle the question of whether there is a short-term funding crisis in Europe. Or, in plainer speech, is the Credit Crunch back and better than ever?

The optimistic view is that the real economy in Europe is recovering, albeit slowly. A key purchasing manager's index in Europe hit a three-month low, but it was still positive. And the line of argument in this camp is that the real economy will grow slowly, but is nowhere near as dysfunctional and systemically unstable as financial markets are.

Financial markets, for their part, are trying to digest two political moves. The first move is the legislative efforts to curb credit growth (the U.S. reform bill). That might reduce bad bank lending. But it would almost certainly limit credit growth. And in a system that requires on a lot of short-term credit to finance activity, it means less activity, lower real growth, falling asset values, and economic contraction.

The second issue is the growing weight of Europe's dead hand on the market. This will feel familiar to Australian investors lately. What we mean is that one of the big results of the Greek crisis is a call for economic policy coordination. This is being euphemistically called "economic governance." But it's actually an attempt for more centralised and coordinated European regulation and policy making.

Because the problem with the EU is that it's not centralised enough.

The credit markets are telling us they are not convinced that Europe's policy makers can coordinate a response to huge sovereign debt levels in Spain, Greece, Portugal, and Italy. As the sense of anxiety by financial firms becomes more acute, they become a lot less trusting of each other. Banks who are unsure about what's on another bank's balance sheet don't lend. These shows up as an increase in the London Interbank Offered Rate, the rate banks charge one another in overnight lending.

Bloomberg reports that, "Traders in the forward market are betting the premium of the three-month dollar London interbank offered rate, or Libor, over what investors expect the overnight federal funds rate to average known as the Libor-OIS spread will climb to about 42 basis points next month and about 61 basis points by September, according to UBS AG data. The spot spread was about 27 basis points May 21."

"This is a quintessential liquidity crisis," William Cunningham tells Bloomberg. He's the head of credit strategies and fixed-income research at State Street Corporation in Boston. "It's not inconceivable to imagine a situation where the markets behave so poorly, the liquidity behaves so badly, and risk-tolerance just evaporates that particularly in Europe consumers contract, businesses stop hiring and stop investing, and economic activity halts."

Granted, the current situation is nowhere near as bad as October of 2008. Libor soared by 364 basis points then and the whole inter-bank lending market was nearly frozen. But if the political climate continues to generate so much instability, the financial markets are going to get pretty cold.

Does any of this have any effect on the real economy here in Australia? Well, last week the National Australia Bank sent retailer Clive Peeters into administration because the bank was unwilling to loan the electrical goods seller $38 million. That seems like chump change these days. So why cut them off?

As Adele Ferguson reports in today's Age, corporate Australia is sitting on $180 billion in short-term debt it must refinance in the next two years. Over the last 18 months or so, Aussie banks have been silently hoping the economy would improve enough that extending credit to small- and mid-size firms wouldn't endanger the balance sheet.

Mind you it's not the big firms that are in trouble here. During the credit crisis, big Aussie blue chips tapped the equity markets for another $90 billion in capital. This did not always benefit shareholders if the company sold equity cheaply. But it did buttress the balance sheet.

The trouble is that small- and mid-sized businesses can't simply raise equity. They depend heavily on short-term bank financing. When the cost of that financing goes up because of tighter global liquidity, or when Aussie banks simply become more cautious to protect their own balance sheets, then you get the local consequence of the credit depression: the inability of smaller firms to borrow.

Meanwhile, the government continues its public relations war against the mining industry. You have to wonder what the government hopes to win by trashing the industry in front of international investors like this. The obvious answer is: money!

To be fair, whether production or profits should be taxed is an interesting question. And whether a tax or royalty should be levelled as the state or Federal level is also an interesting questions. By "interesting" we mean debateable if you accept at face value the government's right to tax private enterprise. We're not saying we like it.

But this line of attack that, "the community has not received a fair return for its non-renewable resources during boom times" is a bit rich, isn't it? This again presumes that it is the community which owns Australia's mineral resources. Does it?
If you accept that argument, then it follows that the community owns every kind of national resource, not just land and property but labour and intellectual capital too. If the government is entitled to tax the mining industry for what it believes to be unfair profits, why not the banks? Why not any kind of activity which policy makers determine is not providing its "fair share?"

Dan Denning
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

Similar Posts:


Arbing Spot And Forward Curve Steepness

Posted: 23 May 2010 12:49 PM PDT

On Friday we pointed out that after nearly 9 months of straight line steepening, the Treasury curve, as depicted by the spot 2s10s, has collapsed, and has flattened from 290 to 240 bps practically overnight, in what has been an unprecedentedly rapid move in the curve, driven primarily by asset liquidations. Those with exposure to spot are panicking, and have been forced to cover what amounts to billions in levered notional positions. Some (the lucky ones) only have synthetic exposure, via Constant Maturity Swaps or other Robertson/Klarman-esque contraptions, thus limiting a downside they can walk away from. They are the minority. Yet an interesting observation, coming by way of Morgan Stanley's Jim Caron, who little by little is forced to wave the white flag of surrender not only on his 5.5% call in the 10 year by Year End, but also on his all out steepening trade, is that flattening has really only occurred in the spot curve: forward yield curves, both the 1y and 2y, have surprisingly retained their steepening bias in spite of unprecedented vol and liquidations. Why is this? Caron explains. However, more relevantly, his observation that a convergence between spot and forward curves is imminent could serve as an easy (famous last words) way to pick 100 bps.

From Morgan Stanley:

The fruit of the bond market is carry and the fear of a sovereign risk crisis in Europe is the tree that bears that fruit. The Fed is less likely to hike rates, and as a result, yields are more likely to remain in a range. Traders may look to earn carry in two ways: first, they may buy front-end rates for attractive carry and roll down, since the Fed is not likely to hike until 2011. This trade is particularly attractive for those like us who are worried about a rise in yields once sovereign risks become fully priced. Timing that is difficult, but when it happens, one would not want to have long duration exposure. As a result, earning carry and roll down in the front-end has a better return per unit of risk. Second, for those who are more pessimistic on the outcome of the sovereign risk events and want to position more aggressively with long duration risk, then owning the higher yielding backend of the curve may be more attractive and preferable. Effectively, what this means is that spot yield curves can flatten while forward yield curves steepen on a relative basis. Said differently, we expect a convergence between the spot and forward rate curves – a classic range-trading tactic that allows one to earn carry more safely. This will be the theme of our report this week.



All yield curves are not created equal. There is a difference in the performance of spot and forward yield curves, and it can be said that they serve different masters. We illustrate in Exhibit 1 the performance of the spot US 2s10s swap curve and its 1-year and 2-year forward brethren. Notice that the spot curve has flattened back toward levels last seen in late 2009 and at the start of 2010. However, the forward starting curves have maintained a steepening bias. There are several reasons for this but we will focus on just a few. As we see it, the current flattening of the spot curve is responding to the need to gain long duration exposure and pick-up carry by players such as pension funds and insurance companies, as other risky asset markets are at risk of underperforming. Fear of a disinflation and lower yields brought on by an economic downturn is the master the back-end serves. This flattens the spot curve.

The master the front-end serves is carry. And as bond math would imply, the yields of shorter duration front-end bonds with a smaller DV01 are more sensitive to price and thus to carry. Expectations of economic recovery and Fed rate hikes kept front-end forward rates high, and this is why the forward curves remained so much flatter than spot. What’s different today is that the Fed is expected to keep rates low, thus forward front-end rates are now likely to drop faster and by more than back-end rates.

For example, 1y1y rates have dropped quickly as the market priced out Fed hikes in 2010. We show this in Exhibit 2 where 1y1y rates are approaching all-time lows even from the US crisis in 2008-09. An investor who buys the 1y1y rate and expects the Fed to remain on hold is expecting to capture the roll down between the 1y1y rate and the spot 1y rate. This will have the effect of keeping the forward curve steep. Putting it all together, the forward curve may steepen relative to a flattening in the spot curve. As such our core view remains to hold forward curve steepeners as we like the return per unit of risk that the owning the front-end offers, while hedging it with a short in back-end forward rates. But there are limitations to this view. The risk is that front-end forward rates converge to spot rates and then stagnate – in which case the forward curve would start to flatten. Exhibit 3 illustrates how this might happen: if an extreme divergence occurs between rising 1y Libor rates due to the increased funding risks brought on by the sovereign debt crisis vs. a decline in 1y1y rates driven by the reduced expectations for Fed hikes. The scenario we see for this to happen would be one that prices a significant disinflationary downturn brought on by a severe deterioration in sovereign risk conditions. That is not our base case, and unless we see it otherwise, we will maintain forward curve steepeners and earn carry.



Conclusion: Convergence of spot and forward curves. Current market conditions necessitate that we become more tactical and less strategic in our views. Strategically, we still believe the spot curve may steepen by year-end. But  tactically we prefer to express a relative curve trade of forward curve steepeners vs. the spot curve (Exhibit 4). We achieve this by reversing our long-held short in the T 2s10s30s butterfly, a surrogate curve steepener, while maintaining forward curve steepening exposure (Exhibit 5). More on this theme in the following pages.

Fundamentally, this is a solid trade, although just like Goldman, MS has been struggling with generating any sort of positive alpha for its clients over the past 6 months. Additionally, the MS trade, as Caron admits, is contingent on stabilization in the European contagion and moderation in short-term funding. Alas, this is not our base case. Which is why we anticipate substantial further curve flattening as Libor continues its relentless creep higher. To be sure this will play out in spot, while forward curves may take some time to follow through. Which is we recommend that any convergence arb be sufficiently padded with liquidity should the spot-1y move materially wider than recent highs of 100 bps.


Merryn Somerset Webb: The only currency that can't be printed on a whim

Posted: 23 May 2010 12:44 PM PDT

By Merryn Somerset Webb
Financial Times, London
Friday, May 21, 2010

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d6a8da26-64fd-11df-b648-00144feab49a.html

You probably think gold is in a bubble. After all, it hit new highs in dollars, pounds, and euros this week -- and has pretty much quintupled since its lows of 2001.

What's more, everyone from Germany to China is still nuts for it. Earlier in the week, this newspaper reported that the Germans have been snapping up coins and gold bars faster than they did even in the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers' collapse. In the UAE you can buy bars direct from a vending machine. At Harrods you can pick up a variety of gold coins over the counter. And -- as the gold bears are keen to point out -- you can see ads for the purchase of gold all over TV.

But look at the actual price of gold and it is hard to see real evidence of a bubble. Gold may have hit new highs in nominal terms, but it hasn't come close to hitting its old highs in real terms. Adjust the 1980 high of $850 for US inflation and you get a price of around $2,400 -- a level only the most bullish are predicting even now.



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy Resource Corp. Appoints Rob McEwen to Advisory Board

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX.V: PCY, OTC: PCYRF) is pleased to announce the appointment of Rob McEwen to the company's Advisory Board. McEwen is a leading Canadian mining industry entrepreneur. He is the chairman and CEO of U.S. Gold Corp. and Minera Andes Inc. McEwen was the founder and former chairman and CEO of Goldcorp Inc., whose Red Lake Mine in northwestern Ontario, Canada, is considered to be the richest gold mine in the world. During his tenure at Goldcorp, McEwen transformed the company from a collection of small companies into a mining powerhouse, growing its market capitalization from $50 million to approximately $8 billion.

For Prophecy Resource Corp.'s complete statement:

http://www.prophecyresource.com/news_2010_mar11b.php



Then look to the last few years. The bears would have you believe that the gold price has somehow gone "parabolic." But, in fact, the price in US dollars has risen only around 25 per cent in the last two years.

Compare that with, say, shares in Rockhopper Exploration, the lucky owner of the prospects where oil was struck off the Falklands the week before last. Its shares started the month at around 40p and have since more than quadrupled. But no one is shouting "bubble!" Far from it. Instead, they are all claiming the company has seen a transformational event, which makes its shares worth more than they are even now (which arguably they are).

But hasn't there been a transformational global event that has changed the case for gold too?

Back when gold's bull run kicked off, there were precious few gold bugs and we tended to make the case for the metal based on likely demand for "bling" from the new middle classes of emerging markets. We mentioned only in passing the fast rising US national debt and the nagging fear that fiat currencies might not be all they were cracked up to be.

Today, however, gold has reverted to its historical role as the global currency of the last resort. You no longer buy it because you think the Chinese and Russians are likely to up their consumption of gold-plated mobile phones. You buy it because you think there is a chance that governments, caught in a debt trap from which there is no honourable escape, will eventually think they have no choice but to print their way out of it. And the risk of hyperinflation is a transformational event for gold -- it being the only global currency that can't be printed on the whim of a central bank.

All that said, there is a strong chance that we might see a short-term falloff in the gold price.

Why? Partly because high prices are putting off India's jewellery buyers. Partly because there is likely to be a short hiatus in new investor buyers coming to the market -- if you haven't panicked yet, you will need a new crisis before you do so. But mostly because, after the mini-inflation scare following the ECB's bailout plans for Europe, we seem to be having a deflation scare. Prices may be stubbornly rising in the UK but Spain is now in outright deflation (exclude energy and food, and prices are falling) and core inflation across Europe and the US is very low.

The endless money-printing across the world has not yet brought us proper inflation simply because the mechanism for passing it on isn't working very well: The banks are too busy repairing their balance sheets to lend it out. But there is nothing like deflation to bring on hyperinflation: Governments desperate to prop up prices and economies, despite being broke, print reams of money -- money that eventually enters the market in a rush, flipping deflation to inflation.

If you can get a copy of Adam Ferguson's 1975 book "When Money Dies" (soon to be republished), you will find an excellent account of how this happened in the Weimar Republic. It might not happen again but, at this point, it would surely be foolhardy to discount it entirely.

Finally, a word on the ads for gold on TV. There is much muttering about them being a sign of the top. But that is to misunderstand the direction of the flow. The ads aren't selling gold to willing punters. They are persuading them to sell their gold at a discount to the spot rate. That's a very different thing -- more suggestive of awareness of gold beginning to enter the public mind than of a bubble. Either way I'd ignore the ads. If you have gold, you should hang on to it. If you haven't, you should use the pull-back in price to get some.

I've written here before about the Blackrock Gold & General Fund and gold ETFs but another fund that might be worth holding is Junior Mining, which specialises in smaller mining companies.

-----

Merryn Somerset Webb is editor-in-chief of Money Week. The views expressed are personal.

* * *

Join GATA here:

World Resource Investment Conference
Sunday and Monday, June 6 and 7, 2010
Vancouver Convention Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
http://www.cambridgehouse.ca/index.php/world-resource-investment-confere...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Anglo Far-East Bullion Co., the Original Private Bullion Custodian
http://www.anglofareast.com/

For two decades Anglo Far-East Bullion co. has been providing select international clientele the highest degree of privacy, security, and access to buy, hold, and sell allocated gold and silver bars.

-- Allocated gold and silver bars: AFE will not only provide you with the individual bar numbers of the bullion bars you own, but you can also rest safely in the knowledge that each bar is sight-verified by a top Swiss auditor and annually checked off against AFE accounts to ensure that your metal is locked away safely.

-- Guaranteed market access and liquidity: AFE buys and sells directly with LBMA-certified metal refineries only. In bypassing the commodities market exchanges such as the Comex and bullion banks, AFE provides clients a means of access to the global physical precious metals markets that may not be available to others should systemic issues in the bullion markets arise.

-- Stand for delivery: If at any time you wish to take delivery of your metal, AFE will arrange to have bars shipped to you anywhere in the world.

-- Zero tolerance for leverage: AFE refuses to deal with "paper gold." We believe our clients want the metal itself so they may avoid the risks of the paper markets. AFE will not introduce such risk to its clients.

-- Metal vaulted outside the banking system: None of AFE's clients have to worry that their metal is exposed to encumbrances bearing on bullion banks and commodities markets. None of AFE's vaulting partners or other strategic providers are controlled or majority-owned by banks. This is by design, not by accident.

-- Access to the LBMA system of refineries, vaults, and security providers. This allows AFE clients to maintain London Good Delivery status of their metal, ensuring ease of sale or transfer, while being insulated from the "paper gold" market.

-- Total privacy: AFE accounts are managed as numbered accounts in the Swiss private banking tradition. At no time does identifying information such as name and address appear on any account statement or other account documents.

-- Geo-political diversification: In the words of the wise King Solomon, "Place a portion of seven and eight throughout the land, for you know not where evil may arise." Many of AFE's clients choose AFE specifically because their metal is safely vaulted outside the jurisdiction they reside in.

-- Iron-clad governance: By contract with AFE's vaulting provider, no access may be made to the vaults without the attendance of an agent of the vault as well as an agent of the third-party signatory trustee, in this case top Swiss auditor Grant Thornton. All metal going into and -- more importantly -- coming out of the vaults requires the approval of a third-party signatory trustee as well as a detailed, sight-verified report of each bar and serial number by the auditor.

For more information and a personal consultation with one of our private account liaisons, please contact us:

Anglo Far-East Bullion Co.
E-mail: newclients@anglofareast.com
USA: 1-206-905-9961
Panama: 507-264-0164
New Zealand: +64-9337-0715
Australia: +61-8-8334-6855
Switzerland: +41-43-508-0351
United Kingdom: +44-208-819-3911
Hong Kong: +852-8124-1265



Merryn Somerset Webb: The only currency that can't be printed on a whim

Posted: 23 May 2010 12:44 PM PDT

By Merryn Somerset Webb
Financial Times, London
Friday, May 21, 2010

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d6a8da26-64fd-11df-b648-00144feab49a.html

You probably think gold is in a bubble. After all, it hit new highs in dollars, pounds, and euros this week -- and has pretty much quintupled since its lows of 2001.

What's more, everyone from Germany to China is still nuts for it. Earlier in the week, this newspaper reported that the Germans have been snapping up coins and gold bars faster than they did even in the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers' collapse. In the UAE you can buy bars direct from a vending machine. At Harrods you can pick up a variety of gold coins over the counter. And -- as the gold bears are keen to point out -- you can see ads for the purchase of gold all over TV.

But look at the actual price of gold and it is hard to see real evidence of a bubble. Gold may have hit new highs in nominal terms, but it hasn't come close to hitting its old highs in real terms. Adjust the 1980 high of $850 for US inflation and you get a price of around $2,400 -- a level only the most bullish are predicting even now.



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy Resource Corp. Appoints Rob McEwen to Advisory Board

Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX.V: PCY, OTC: PCYRF) is pleased to announce the appointment of Rob McEwen to the company's Advisory Board. McEwen is a leading Canadian mining industry entrepreneur. He is the chairman and CEO of U.S. Gold Corp. and Minera Andes Inc. McEwen was the founder and former chairman and CEO of Goldcorp Inc., whose Red Lake Mine in northwestern Ontario, Canada, is considered to be the richest gold mine in the world. During his tenure at Goldcorp, McEwen transformed the company from a collection of small companies into a mining powerhouse, growing its market capitalization from $50 million to approximately $8 billion.

For Prophecy Resource Corp.'s complete statement:

http://www.prophecyresource.com/news_2010_mar11b.php



Then look to the last few years. The bears would have you believe that the gold price has somehow gone "parabolic." But, in fact, the price in US dollars has risen only around 25 per cent in the last two years.

Compare that with, say, shares in Rockhopper Exploration, the lucky owner of the prospects where oil was struck off the Falklands the week before last. Its shares started the month at around 40p and have since more than quadrupled. But no one is shouting "bubble!" Far from it. Instead, they are all claiming the company has seen a transformational event, which makes its shares worth more than they are even now (which arguably they are).

But hasn't there been a transformational global event that has changed the case for gold too?

Back when gold's bull run kicked off, there were precious few gold bugs and we tended to make the case for the metal based on likely demand for "bling" from the new middle classes of emerging markets. We mentioned only in passing the fast rising US national debt and the nagging fear that fiat currencies might not be all they were cracked up to be.

Today, however, gold has reverted to its historical role as the global currency of the last resort. You no longer buy it because you think the Chinese and Russians are likely to up their consumption of gold-plated mobile phones. You buy it because you think there is a chance that governments, caught in a debt trap from which there is no honourable escape, will eventually think they have no choice but to print their way out of it. And the risk of hyperinflation is a transformational event for gold -- it being the only global currency that can't be printed on the whim of a central bank.

All that said, there is a strong chance that we might see a short-term falloff in the gold price.

Why? Partly because high prices are putting off India's jewellery buyers. Partly because there is likely to be a short hiatus in new investor buyers coming to the market -- if you haven't panicked yet, you will need a new crisis before you do so. But mostly because, after the mini-inflation scare following the ECB's bailout plans for Europe, we seem to be having a deflation scare. Prices may be stubbornly rising in the UK but Spain is now in outright deflation (exclude energy and food, and prices are falling) and core inflation across Europe and the US is very low.

The endless money-printing across the world has not yet brought us proper inflation simply because the mechanism for passing it on isn't working very well: The banks are too busy repairing their balance sheets to lend it out. But there is nothing like deflation to bring on hyperinflation: Governments desperate to prop up prices and economies, despite being broke, print reams of money -- money that eventually enters the market in a rush, flipping deflation to inflation.

If you can get a copy of Adam Ferguson's 1975 book "When Money Dies" (soon to be republished), you will find an excellent account of how this happened in the Weimar Republic. It might not happen again but, at this point, it would surely be foolhardy to discount it entirely.

Finally, a word on the ads for gold on TV. There is much muttering about them being a sign of the top. But that is to misunderstand the direction of the flow. The ads aren't selling gold to willing punters. They are persuading them to sell their gold at a discount to the spot rate. That's a very different thing -- more suggestive of awareness of gold beginning to enter the public mind than of a bubble. Either way I'd ignore the ads. If you have gold, you should hang on to it. If you haven't, you should use the pull-back in price to get some.

I've written here before about the Blackrock Gold & General Fund and gold ETFs but another fund that might be worth holding is Junior Mining, which specialises in smaller mining companies.

-----

Merryn Somerset Webb is editor-in-chief of Money Week. The views expressed are personal.

* * *

Join GATA here:

World Resource Investment Conference
Sunday and Monday, June 6 and 7, 2010
Vancouver Convention Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
http://www.cambridgehouse.ca/index.php/world-resource-investment-confere...

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Anglo Far-East Bullion Co., the Original Private Bullion Custodian
http://www.anglofareast.com/

For two decades Anglo Far-East Bullion co. has been providing select international clientele the highest degree of privacy, security, and access to buy, hold, and sell allocated gold and silver bars.

-- Allocated gold and silver bars: AFE will not only provide you with the individual bar numbers of the bullion bars you own, but you can also rest safely in the knowledge that each bar is sight-verified by a top Swiss auditor and annually checked off against AFE accounts to ensure that your metal is locked away safely.

-- Guaranteed market access and liquidity: AFE buys and sells directly with LBMA-certified metal refineries only. In bypassing the commodities market exchanges such as the Comex and bullion banks, AFE provides clients a means of access to the global physical precious metals markets that may not be available to others should systemic issues in the bullion markets arise.

-- Stand for delivery: If at any time you wish to take delivery of your metal, AFE will arrange to have bars shipped to you anywhere in the world.

-- Zero tolerance for leverage: AFE refuses to deal with "paper gold." We believe our clients want the metal itself so they may avoid the risks of the paper markets. AFE will not introduce such risk to its clients.

-- Metal vaulted outside the banking system: None of AFE's clients have to worry that their metal is exposed to encumbrances bearing on bullion banks and commodities markets. None of AFE's vaulting partners or other strategic providers are controlled or majority-owned by banks. This is by design, not by accident.

-- Access to the LBMA system of refineries, vaults, and security providers. This allows AFE clients to maintain London Good Delivery status of their metal, ensuring ease of sale or transfer, while being insulated from the "paper gold" market.

-- Total privacy: AFE accounts are managed as numbered accounts in the Swiss private banking tradition. At no time does identifying information such as name and address appear on any account statement or other account documents.

-- Geo-political diversification: In the words of the wise King Solomon, "Place a portion of seven and eight throughout the land, for you know not where evil may arise." Many of AFE's clients choose AFE specifically because their metal is safely vaulted outside the jurisdiction they reside in.

-- Iron-clad governance: By contract with AFE's vaulting provider, no access may be made to the vaults without the attendance of an agent of the vault as well as an agent of the third-party signatory trustee, in this case top Swiss auditor Grant Thornton. All metal going into and -- more importantly -- coming out of the vaults requires the approval of a third-party signatory trustee as well as a detailed, sight-verified report of each bar and serial number by the auditor.

For more information and a personal consultation with one of our private account liaisons, please contact us:

Anglo Far-East Bullion Co.
E-mail: newclients@anglofareast.com
USA: 1-206-905-9961
Panama: 507-264-0164
New Zealand: +64-9337-0715
Australia: +61-8-8334-6855
Switzerland: +41-43-508-0351
United Kingdom: +44-208-819-3911
Hong Kong: +852-8124-1265




In The News Today

Posted: 23 May 2010 12:29 PM PDT

Jim Sinclair's Commentary

If the financial bill contained no significant controls, if not elimination of the OTC derivative market, it is hollow and meaningless.

Wall St. money floods D.C. in finance bill fight
Lobbyists, who have spent $1.7 billion in 10 years, seek payback
By Eric Lichtblau and Edward Wyatt
updated 5:06 a.m. ET, Sun., May 23, 2010

WASHINGTON – Last Wednesday, Representative David Scott, Democrat of Georgia, mingled with insurance and financial executives and other supporters at a lunchtime fund-raiser in his honor at a chic Washington wine bar before rushing out to cast a House vote.

Nearby, supporters of Representative Michael E. Capuano, Democrat of Massachusetts, gathered that evening at a Capitol Hill town house for a $1,000-a-head fund-raiser. Just as that was wrapping up, Representative Peter T. King, Republican of New York, was feted by campaign donors at nearby Nationals Park at a game against the Mets.

It was just another day in the nonstop fund-raising cycle for members of the House Financial Services Committee, which has become a magnet for money from Wall Street and other deep-pocketed contributors, especially as Congress moves to finalize the most sweeping new financial regulations in seven decades.

More…


Jim's Mailbox

Posted: 23 May 2010 12:25 PM PDT

Dear Jim,

The "Recovery" continues apace.

Regards,
CIGA Pedro

April mass layoffs rise led by manufacturing

(Reuters) – The number of mass layoffs by U.S. employers rose in April led by manufacturers who shed workers even as the economy began to recover.

The Labor Department said the number of mass layoff events — defined as job cuts involving at least 50 people from a single employer — increased by 228 to 1,856 as employers shed 200,870 jobs on a seasonally adjusted basis.

More…

 

ABC of Silver (&Gold)
CIGA Eric

A – The surge above the 1/20/10 gap on a sign of strength on 5/11 was a technical breakout.

B – The subsequent break below the 5/11 gap on a significant contraction in volume was a false breakdown that will be reversed in time.

C – The retest of the 5/5 gap on decreasing volume suggests that the downside force is waning.

Whatever cannot go down with force will reverse and attempt to go up with force. The reversal should come once the margin selling subsides in both gold and silver.

Silver ETF (SLV):
clip_image001

More…


Inflation-Proof Deflation Hedge

Posted: 23 May 2010 11:40 AM PDT

Knowing how governments will respond to deflation, the case for inflation-proof gold looks increasingly clear to cautious wealth... Read More...



Only A Matter Of Time

Posted: 23 May 2010 11:19 AM PDT

European debt problems have become the center of market attention. However, it is only a matter of time until markets turn their focus to the financial problems of larger countries such as the United Kingdom, Japan and the United States. Read More...



Don't come to Kitchen unless you want burns

Posted: 23 May 2010 10:40 AM PDT

This topic is about staying out the Precious Kitchen or risk getting burned. You want the proper appliances and enough space to move around. Espcecially if you have a large family of 5 to feed.


Goldies recommends you load on shisk Kabobs. These are tasty spears.

Getting a nice kitchen requires many dollars.



This isn't a spike but a correction to the upside.

Its okay to have hardwood floors but getting hardwood walls, too, is a sign of decadence.


Government’s mortgage-modification program a disaster

Posted: 23 May 2010 10:37 AM PDT

By Sol Palha, Tactical Investor

So there we have it; this great programme that was supposed to bring relief to thousands of homeowners has turned out to be a curse in disguise. Individuals had to wait months to find out if they would qualify for the programme. While waiting, they continued to make payments only to find out that in the end they did not qualify. Isn't this just lovely? You have one foot in the grave and the government instead of offering a helping hand hands you a shovel and tells you to start digging. Avoid the housing sector, and if you are aggressive consider shorting stocks such as BZH and LEN; use strong rallies to open up new positions.

 

The government's mortgage-modification program has left some struggling homeowners worse off than they were before.

The Treasury reported Monday that nearly one in four homeowners who were offered lower payments under the Obama administration's 15-month-old effort have been weeded out of the program. Many people were removed from the trials because they failed to make payments, didn't provide all the financial documents needed to qualify or were found to be ineligible.

Homeowners are first offered trial modifications under the program, which provides incentive payments to loan servicers, investors and the homeowners. If borrowers make the payments and satisfy other criteria, those trials are made permanent, ensuring a cut in payments for five years.

While awaiting answers, some borrowers keep making payments, exhausting their savings in what may be a futile effort to save their homes. They also incur fees from the banks and delay taking action that might give them a fresh start in a more affordable home.

Some borrowers had unrealistic expectations about loan-relief programs, which were never designed to prevent all foreclosures. Another big problem is that banks often take six to 12 months to determine whether applicants are eligible.

"I had to learn the hard way and deplete my savings doing it," said Mia Parry, a manager at a mortgage brokerage in Scottsdale, Ariz., who has spent nearly two years seeking a loan modification. She now wishes she had put her home on the market.

Most struggling borrowers do benefit from seeking help, said Aaron Horvath, a senior vice president at Springboard Inc., a nonprofit counseling service based in Riverside, Calif.

Some win modifications, cutting monthly payments by hundreds of dollars. Others who ultimately can't get modifications at least are allowed to stay in their homes for months, making either no payments or reduced payments.

But "if you're draining your savings" in a vain effort to hang onto a home, he said, you may end up worse off. Full story

 

Disclosure

 

We have no positions in the stated investments

More articles from the Tactical Investor….



Billionaire “Bull of Bullion” Holds Roughly $2B in Gold-Related Assets

Posted: 23 May 2010 10:37 AM PDT

The Daily Reckoning

There's a great deal of debate about where gold is headed next, but at least one billionaire investor has more than made up his mind.

Thomas Kaplan, the chairman and chief investment officer of Tigris Financial Group, fears excessive government spending has failed to stop contagion in the world financial system, and that the downturn is likely to get worse before it gets any better. In light of the situation, gold is his favorite investment… by far.

From The Wall Street Journal:

"Many fund managers and high-rollers have allocated small percentages of their portfolios to gold as a hedge against inflation. But Mr. Kaplan is the bull of bullion. He has gone further than perhaps any other major investor, betting the majority of his wealth on gold and other precious metals. And it reflects his deeply held conviction that global economic instability could bring rising demand for gold.

"Through his firm, Tigris Financial Group, and affiliates, Mr. Kaplan has loaded up on bullion and bought up properties in 17 countries on five continents, where geologists are exploring for more. Tigris subsidiaries have taken stakes in mining companies, including tiny firms that have yet to produce an ounce.

"Though he won't disclose how much physical gold he owns, Mr. Kaplan, who is 47 years old, controls up to 30% of the shares in some so-called junior miners. Together, his holdings amount to a nearly $2 billion bet on gold, more than the Brazilian central bank's bullion is currently worth. 'I've reached a point where I feel the only asset I have confidence in is gold,' Mr. Kaplan said in an interview at Tigris's midtown Manhattan headquarters."

Kaplan sees a bet on gold as being relatively conservative, and that either way markets turn there's hope in the yellow metal. He describes his view, "If the world does well, gold will be fine. If the world doesn't do well, gold will also do fine… but a lot of other things could collapse."

His confidence largely stems from the lack of major recent gold mine discoveries, especially given how much time is required to get a new find up and running. He points out that if gold demand holds steady, or continues to increase, the supply still won't be there, and prices are likely to stay higher.

You can read more about the "bull of bullion" in The Wall Street Journal's coverage of a billionaire going all-in on gold.

Best,

Rocky Vega,
The Daily Reckoning

Billionaire "Bull of Bullion" Holds Roughly $2B in Gold-Related Assets originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, offers a uniquely refreshing, perspective on the global economy, investing, gold, stocks and today's markets. Its been called "the most entertaining read of the day."

More articles from The Daily Reckoning….



World’s Most Valuable Coin, 1794 Flowing Hair Silver Dollar

Posted: 23 May 2010 10:35 AM PDT

The Neil/Carter/Contursi specimen 1794 Flowing Hair silver dollar has been sold for $7,850,000, setting a new record as the world's most valuable rare coin.
Graded PCGS Specimen-66, it is the finest known 1794 dollar and believed by several prominent experts to be the first silver dollar ever struck by the United States Mint.
It was sold by [...]



Bullion Prices & Business Weekend Recap – May 22, 2010

Posted: 23 May 2010 10:35 AM PDT

Weekend Recap: Silver, Gold and Platinum Prices; Business Week NewsMarkets settled somewhat calmer on Friday, with stocks rising and declines in commodities tempered. However, the week as a whole was disastrous, with Europe's debt crisis rattling financial sectors and fostering concerns over a global recovery and demand for industrial metals and oil.

Gold's weekly decline was the largest in nearly 15 months. Palladium and palladium posted double-digit percent losses in two days that held for the week. And crude dropped Friday for a ninth day.

Although U.S. and European stocks rallied on Friday, major indexes posted weekly losses of between 3.64 percent and 5.02 percent.

(…)
Read the rest of Bullion Prices & Business Weekend Recap – May 22, 2010 (1,476 words)


© CoinNews.net for Coin News, 2010. |
Permalink |
No comment |
Want more on these topics? Browse the archive of posts filed under Bullion Articles and Precious Metal Reports, Business News.



James Turk: Silver inching closer to an upside breakout

Posted: 23 May 2010 10:35 AM PDT

9:20p ET Saturday, May 22, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold (and Silver):

GoldMoney founder James Turk, editor of the Free Gold Money Report and consultant to GATA, writes tonight that silver's "huge accumulation pattern" of the last three years is almost finished and as a result "silver is inching closing to an upside breakout." That's the headline on Turk's commentary and you can find it at the FGMR Internet site here;

http://www.fgmr.com/silver-is-inching-closer-to-an-upside-breakout.html

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



LBMA gold shorts backed by central banks, Rickards tells King World News

Posted: 23 May 2010 10:35 AM PDT

9p ET Saturday, May 22, 2010

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Eric King today has a spectacular 15-minute interview with James G. Rickards, senior managing director for Virginia-based research firm Omnis Inc., that has been written up wonderfully at Zero Hedge here:

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/jim-rickards-discusses-financial-warfar…

Perhaps most interestingly, Rickards speculates that London Bullion Market Association members that are short gold are underwritten by central banks. That would confirm GATA's contention that the LBMA is a major mechanism of the gold price suppression scheme. Send that man his tin-foil hat!

You can find the Rickards interview at King World News here:

http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/5/22_J…

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



The Must Know Truth About Gold

Posted: 23 May 2010 10:35 AM PDT

Cliff Wachtel submits:

Reading the financial press, I'm seeing the usual confusion about gold.

Now they're calling it a safe haven asset. A year ago it was routinely referred to as a risk asset.

Both of these descriptions aren't even gross oversimplifications – they simply miss the essence of what drives gold demand.

Here's the key point to understand about gold: it isn't a risk OR safe haven asset, because it doesn't move with or against risk appetite. Rather it rises with fear about the value of paper currency, regardless of overall risk appetite. That fear can occur in both bull and bear markets.

Here's proof.

Throughout the entire risk asset rally of March – December 2009, gold rose along with the S&P 500.

Read more »



Key Market Drivers, May 24-28, 2010: Same Array of Bullish, Bearish Forces Still At Work

Posted: 23 May 2010 10:35 AM PDT

Cliff Wachtel submits:

Summary

1. EU Debt Crisis-related events

2. Risk asset short term oversold reaction rally- Note technical resistance levels be ready for more downside

3, Key Calendar Events: US data setting expectations for next week's monthly jobs reports

4, The ongoing interplay of short term bullish and longer term bearish forces

Prior Week Prime Market Movers

1. EU Debt Crisis-Related Events

  • Tuesday May 18th: Germany attempts to ban naked short sales of certain securities.
  • Just as markets were showing signs of stabilizing Monday, this move scared markets into another multi-day selloff. The ban was ill-considered and unworkable given that markets for these securities are mostly outside of Germany and German control. Thus markets interpreted the ban as an ominous sign of panic-induced haste due to some secret danger or imminent trouble at one or more major German banks or insurers.

Read more »



Futures charts; May 24th

Posted: 23 May 2010 08:34 AM PDT

Your usual entertainment for those late nights when you are "Jacks raging insomnia". Now that Billy Mays is selling Mighty Putty in Heaven and the Sham-wow guy is doing 5-10 in Tennessee Federal Penitentiary , late night TV is not what it used to be; so turn over to ZeroHedge and enjoy some futures action. Naked CDS ban is long forgotten, swap line is fully operational and Japanese housewives are turning on their Toshiba's and logging into their ElToro accounts; and nothing stands in the way of a triple point gain. Charts provided below by our usual sponsor; Finviz.com. Recreational links included.

Indexes

 

 

Energy

 

 

Metals

 

 

Agricultural commodities

 

 

Bonds

 

 

Currencies

 

 

 

 

 

I leave you with the words written by Charles Bukowski and wish you a good night and a profitable day:

 

there is enough treachery, hatred violence absurdity in the average human being to supply any given army on any given day  and the best at murder are those who preach against it and the best at hate are those who preach love and the best at war finally are those who preach peace  those who preach god, need god those who preach peace do not have peace those who preach peace do not have love  beware the preachers beware the knowers
beware those who are always reading books beware those who either detest poverty or are proud of it
beware those quick to praise for they need praise in return beware those who are quick to censor they are afraid of what they do not know
beware those who seek constant crowds for they are nothing alone
beware the average man the average woman beware their love, their love is average seeks average  but there is genius in their hatred there is enough genius in their hatred to kill you to kill anybody
not wanting solitude not understanding solitude they will attempt to destroy anything that differs from their own
not being able to create art they will not understand art they will consider their failure as creators only as a failure of the world
not being able to love fully they will believe your love incomplete
and then they will hate you and their hatred will be perfect  like a shining diamond like a knife like a mountain like a tiger like hemlock  their finest art

 


Updated Probable LBO Basket: Buy Protection On CBS, CLX, DGX, OMC And SLE

Posted: 23 May 2010 07:15 AM PDT

BofA/ML's Jeffrey Rosenberg proves once again why he is one of the best credit analysts on Wall Street. Two months ago, the Bank of American put together a basket of potential LBO names which included Pactiv, Lexmark, Lubrizol, US Cellular, and Harris Corp, duly noted on Zero Hedge. He also proposed ways to play these names, focusing on various CDS strategies, of which by far the simplest one was to buy outright naked CDS on the names. Sure enough, this week Pactiv blew out, on rumors of an Apollo LBO (we hope for the sake of Pactiv's employees, not to mention Calpers, that the deal never materializes) and the names in the basket have widened by 121%-257% since inception. For those who followed Rosenberg's advice and made a 20x annualized return on the recommendation, congratulations. Sure enough, the trade is now closed. Additionally, after it was noted that a consortium of private equity firms was likely to acquire Fidelity Information Services, Rosenberg noted on May 7 that the deal is unlikely to materialize. Subsequent to his note, the deal has now fallen apart. This week, Rosenberg provides an updated LBO basket, as well as several strategies on how to play these, either outright or as pair trade. We are confident that with liquidity soon to become overabundant yet again, that these specific LBO names are set to see their credit spreads blow out as usual.

Assessment of LBO Risk

The Rosenberg approach to quantifying LBO risk is very simplistic: he uses a "feasibility score" based on a benchmark relative value of 6x Pro Forma leverage and 2x Pro Forma Interest Coverage, typical LBO outcomes post new equity infusion. The actual formula is = 6/Pro Forma leverage + pro forma coverage/2. The higher the result pro forma for a potential LBO, the more likely the name to be taken private. To keep the analysis as simple as possible, IRR considerations are completely ignored as there is so much idiot money out there, that one man's meat is certainly another man's poison (typically the latter "man" will have 0% discount window access to "other people's money" so the cost/benefit analysis is virtually irrelevant). The base-case assumptions are as follows.

Our approach to identifying potential LBO candidates focuses on determining which companies can sustain the higher leverage of a  typical LBO, in addition to size restrictions. After making assumptions regarding the relative size of the equity contribution in a potential buyout (40%), takeover premium (30%), and expected earnings growth, we can calculate pro-forma fundamentals and compare to those in past LBO transactions. Based on historical averages for large LBOs the typical target becomes leveraged 6x (Debt / EBITDA) and has a coverage ratio of 2x (EBITDA / Interest Expense) following an LBO transaction. We say the company is a feasible LBO  candidate if pro-forma credit fundamentals are similar or better than the past successful deals.

We have put together a simple spreadsheet version of the model that relies on Bloomberg data feeds, and can be used to quickly review a given LBO candidate based on our standard assumptions – these can be overwritten as we encourage clients to use their own assumptions. The spreadsheet is available upon request.

We show the results of the spreadsheet model for Pactiv (ticker PTV) in Figure 25. Notice that the pro-forma EV of the trade is $6bn, and the required amount of incremental debt is estimated at close to $2bn.

The final model output is the feasibility score which is based on the pro-forma leverage and coverage ratios. A score of 2.0 or above indicates that an LBO is feasible for the company based on our assumptions. The score for PTV is 3.3, which is substantially above our threshold for LBO feasibility.

Updated Strategy

Now that Pactiv is out the picture and profits on the original basket of LBO names have been taken, which names should investors focus on? Rosenberg is confident that despite the failure of the FIS LBO, there will be various other large name go-private deals soon announced. As such, he believes that while some of the names that have rallied alongside the initial basket, other names have been largely ignored, whose LBO feasibility score is in fact materially higher than those that have blown out. As such, an unhedged trade would include short LBO risk (buying CDS) in five larger names, specifically CBS, Clorox, Quest Diagnostics, Omnicom and Sara Lee, or alternatively hedging short LBO risk with long LBO risk in names that have already run up, in a convergence pair trade.To wit:

Following yesterday’s Pactiv news we closed out our two short credit risk LBO hedging strategies on smaller names. The apparent collapse of a deal for Fidelity National – what we estimate would have been a $15bn enterprise value (EV) LBO – highlights two isssues. First obviously the difficulties in implementing large LBOs under current market conditions but also clearly that the potential for larger LBOs exceeding $10bn in EV exists. To hedge against LBO risk among larger names with pro forma EV in the $10bn-$20bn range we buy CDS protection on a basket of names that appear on our LBO screen but are not influenced by significant LBO speculation

Took profits on original LBO strategies

Yesterday’s Pactiv news adds to a number of recent LBO events for names with pro forma enterprise value below $10bn, including IMS Health and IDC. We took profits on our two LBO hedging strategies in yesterday’s Situation Room. Recall that our first strategy was to buy CDS protection on a basket of LBO candidates. The second strategy hedged such short risk position in CDS by selling protection on an FTD written on the same basket. The net view expressed in the second trade is to effectively buy CDS protection on the second to fifth default. Accordingly this strategy profits as LBO risk increases broadly across the names in the basket (as opposed to more idiosyncratically for one name).

Our original LBO basket consisted of Lexmark International Inc, Pactiv Corp, Lubrizol Corp, Harris Corp and United States Cellular. CDS spreads on this basket have widened 87 bps to 168 bps since mid March (as of May 17th). Clearly, the names in the basket had a correlated move since inception, with 4 names including Pactiv having widened by 121%-257% of their starting spreads  compared with only 25% for the investment grade market (CDX.IG). Accordingly, the FTD in the second trade priced at 60% correlation yesterday compared to 55% at inception. Given this increase in correlation (positive for our FTD) and 90 bps spread widening (negative for our FTD) we estimate that CDS protection on the FTD widened by 206 bps. Thus the net move in the second LBO hedging strategy is a spread widening of 57 bps on our net short position (for our trade we bought protection on $50mn CDS basket and sold protection on $10mn FTD, for the net notional of $40mn and net widening of ($50mn * 87bps - $10mn * 206bps) / $40mn = 57bps).

New LBO hedging strategies

The breakdown of talks for private equity to acquire Fidelity National Information (FIS), in what we estimate would have been a $15bn LBO and on the top-20 list of all time leading LBOs, suggests continued limited ability to complete larger deals. While we are unaware of the precise details, WSJ reported that FIS would not agree to the $32/share price proposed by Blackstone – a 23% premium compared with the close on May 5th. That premium is lower than the historical average of 30% seen in large LBOs suggesting that the economics of large LBOs may still be somewhat stretched. However, clearly the apparent near completion
of a deal suggests the potential for larger LBOs exceeding $10bn in EV.

Judging from the limited reaction to FIS we suggest that the market continues to overestimate the LBO feasibility of well publicized large LBO candidates with pro forma enterprise value of $10bn-$20bn, such as Computer Associates. Thus to hedge against LBO risk among larger names we look elsewhere in the universe of large candidates and select a basket of five names for which our quantitative LBO feasibility screen suggest an LBO is feasible, but that have widened only in line with general market weakness since mid-March. This basket consists of Omnicom Group, Sara Lee, Clorox, Quest Diagnostics and CBS. Our first new trade simply buys CDS protection on an equally weighted basket of these names at 94 bps ($5mm each name). Our target for this trade is a basket spread level of 170 bps while we use a stop loss at 60 bps.

Figure 16 shows our basket along with analysis using our LBO feasibility model – scores above 2.0 indicate that LBOs are feasible. Incremental debt and sponsor equity are also derived from our model. For full details see the section “Assessing LBO Risk” as well as Figure 26 below.

Here is the summary table for those who can't wait to put some virtually zero margin CDS trades on, and are bored of destroying Europe using weapons of mass financial destruction.

Cutting to Rosenberg's recommendation:

  • We recommend buying protection on a basket of credits that are a) feasible LBO candidates based on our model, b) have proforma EV above $10bn, and c) have widened roughly in line with the market since the beginning of March.
  • This basket consists of Omnicom Group, Sara Lee, Clorox, Quest Diagnostics and CBS, with $5mn notional for each name.
  • The current spread on the basket is 94bps. We set the stop loss at 60bps and target of 170bps.

  • Investors could also trade on the lack of discrimination in the credit market between large and small LBO candidates. We see this below as both credit spreads and LBO feasibility scores for companies that fall within our feasible range vary little with pro forma enterprise values. In contrast, as we have argued above, although large deals certainly are possible there is limited capacity in the market for such deals. While we do not formally put on a trade that suggests selling CDS protection on a basket of larger names subject to significant LBO speculation and buying CDS protection on a basket of smaller well known LBO candidates. We show below a hypothetical example of such a trade using baskets of large LBO candidates. Obviously investors would want to carefully select names for this type of trade where one leg is long risk in LBO candidates, exposing the investor to significant downside risk. Alternatively the baskets could be diversified by including more names.

Figure 22 shows example baskets along with analysis using our LBO feasibility model – scores above 2.0 indicate that LBOs are feasible. Incremental debt and sponsor equity are also derived from our model.

Once again to summarize, here are the three proposed trades, which can either be put on together or seperately:

For readers who are unable to trade CDS, a possible analogous pair trade hedge is to buy the stocks of the companies in the short risk bucket, and to short the long-risk ones, on expectation of relative convergence and a possible 25% short- to mid-term IRR. While we have long-endorsed abstaining from indiscriminate market participation, when fundamentals suggest a reasonably favorable risk/return scenario, a trade certainly would make sense, such as the one proposed by Jeffrey Rosenberg, if for no other reason than his so far relatively impeccable track record to date. On the other hand, should another May 6 event occur, and/or should the Fed, for some ungodly reason, decide follow through with threats of liquidity withdrawal, any equity trade will likely see massive downside, which is why these trade suggestions certainly make far more sense for the CDS realm, as any adverse developments in the market will lead to a beta blow out in spreads independent of market fundamentals.


Goldman Shares Poised to Fall After Rising on False SEC Settlement Rumor

Posted: 23 May 2010 06:14 AM PDT

By Static Chaos

Since the SEC's probe, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. shares have dropped more than 20%, but reversed course on Friday rising as much as 5.4%. (See Chart)

Reuters reported market sources confirmed that the jump in Goldman shares was based on rumors that the bank might be close to a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] and because the stock is oversold.


The SEC has charged Goldman of creating and marketing a debt product linked to subprime mortgages crisis without telling investors that a prominent hedge fund helped choose the underlying securities and was betting against them.

While it is nice to learn that Blankfein told India’s Economic Times that he regrets participating in transactions that "brought too much leverage into the world," the posturing does not change the fact that his firm breached its fiduciary duty to investors, and knowingly unloaded the subprime crisis from Goldman's balance sheet onto the markets and taxpayers.

Meanwhile, for those basting in the euphoria of Friday's rebound in the financials, thus believing Goldman's shares are oversold, I'm happy to reiterate that the downward trend from the technical chart (see above) remains intact.

Static Chaos Is The Only Reality


Investing in Range-Bound Markets

Posted: 23 May 2010 04:05 AM PDT

Here is my article on range-bound markets in NAPFA magazine: Investing in Range-Bound Markets by Vitaliy N. Katsenelson (published in NAPFA Magazine)

Vitaliy N. Katsenelson, CFA, is a portfolio manager/director of research at Investment Management Associates in Denver, Colo.  He is the author of “Active Value Investing: Making Money in Range-Bound Markets” (Wiley 2007).  To receive Vitaliy’s future articles by email, click here.


Reasons to stay bullish on silver and gold

Posted: 23 May 2010 03:41 AM PDT

Just as the hills are alive with the sound of music, GIM is alive with noise from bears on precious metals prices. I still march to the beat of a different chart. For more than a year, silver and gold have repeatedly set higher highs and higher lows, and their prices have consistently moved higher against clear uptrend lines. The current charts are shown below. Even with the sharp price drops since Wednesday, silver and gold continue to be higher than their previous lows, and they stay above the year old uptrend lines. That trend is my friend, and I am not ready to bet against it yet. I do not know what will happen in the weeks to come, but I continue to see a bright prospect for silver and gold prices ahead. My bet is that neither silver nor gold will drop a lot lower into a mini bear market until they set new weekly closing prices that are lower than the earlier lows, and until they drop solidly below the uptrend lines. DYODD, of course, but try to tune out the noise from the shrill shouters while you keep the markets in perspective. :wink:

Attachment 1901

Attachment 1902
Attached Images


No comments:

Post a Comment