A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Gold World News Flash

Gold World News Flash


Rick Santelli - 2012 Will See Funding Crisis for Many Countries

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 04:03 PM PST

With the dollar breaking to new recent highs, gold starting the new year strong and bonds near all-time highs, today King World News interviewed Rick Santelli, CNBC's Business News on-air Editor. When asked about maturing securities in both the US and Europe in 2012, Santelli responded, "Yes, this is a big one. The best way to make banks in any country healthier is to have outside investors say, 'Wow, this looks good. I want to buy the bonds or I want to buy the banks or I'm taking in deposits.' Remember deposits have fled out of Europe. That's why that big sucking sound, they need those swaps, they need dollars to fund some of these liabilities."


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Gold Seeker Weekly Wrap-Up: Gold and Silver Gain Over 3% on the Week

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 04:00 PM PST

Gold popped up to $1630.90 by about 9:30AM EST before it fell back to $1608.70 in the next hour of trade, but it then bounced back higher into the close and ended with a loss of just 0.36%. Silver slumped to $28.598 before it also bounced back higher in late morning New York trade, but it still ended with a loss of 2.02%.


By the Numbers for the Week Ending January 6

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 02:44 PM PST

HOUSTON --  Just below is this week's closing table followed by the CFTC disaggregated commitments of traders (DCOT) recap table for the week ending January 6, 2012.

20120106-ClosingTable
 
If the images are too small click on them for a larger version.


Vultures, (Got Gold Report Subscribers) please note that updates to our linked technical charts, including our comments about the COT reports and the week's technical changes, should be completed by the usual time on Sunday (18:00 ET), January 8. 

Please also note a revised stop level for our new trade in the linked silver chart.  

As a reminder, the linked charts for gold, silver, mining shares indexes and important ratios are located in the subscriber pages.  In addition Vultures have access anytime to all 35 of our Vulture Bargain (VB) and Vulture Bargain Candidates of Interest (VBCI)  tracking charts – the small resource-related companies that we attempt to game here at Got Gold Report.   Look for new commentary often as we are making frequent notations in the tracking charts during this fantastic, cascade event, negative liquidity aftermath and post tax loss selling super bargain hunting environment. 

Remember that the linked charts on the subscriber pages are always the first place to look for new commentary at GGR.  In the future we intend to rely more on the charts to communicate, especially when it comes to our own trades.  Members please also note the addition of one new Vulture Bargain Company of Interest (VBCI) as noted by email on Thursday. 

  
Continued…

 
Gold and Silver Disaggregated COT Report (DCOT)


In the DCOT table below a net short position shows as a negative figure in red. A net long position shows in black. In the Change column, a negative number indicates either an increase to an existing net short position or a reduction of a net long position. A black figure in the Change column indicates an increase to an existing long position or a reduction of an existing net short position. The way to think of it is that black figures in the Change column are traders getting "longer" and red figures are traders getting less long or shorter.

All of the trader's positions are calculated net of spreading contracts as of the Tuesday disaggregated COT report.

20120106-DCOT

(DCOT Table for Friday, January 6, 2012, for data as of the close on Tuesday, January 3.   Source CFTC for COT data, Cash Market for gold and silver.)  

*** We will have more in the linked technical charts for Vultures by Sunday evening.***  


Gold Reverses at Channel Resistance

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 02:07 PM PST

courtesy of DailyFX.com January 06, 2012 11:05 AM 240 Minute Bars Prepared by Jamie Saettele, CMT “Price has exceeded 1600 and technical evidence suggests that 1630/40 should be strong resistance. This level is defined by the 20 and 200 day averages, 12/21 high, and channel resistance.” Gold reversed to the tick at its Elliott channel and a drop to a new low is favored. Keep in mind the potential for an extended decline (3rd of 3rd wave). Levels of interest would be former resistance from 2010 at 1445 and the 2011 low at 1320. Bottom Line – short against 1675, target new lows...


Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Files 8k Form Initializing $15,000,000 in Gold-Linked Bonds

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 12:31 PM PST

from Tekoa Da Silva's Bull Market Thinking:

Tipped off 40 minutes ago by our friend and guest of the Bull Market Thinking radio program, Reggie Middleton, it was discovered this morning that Goldman Sachs has just filed an 8k form with Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, initializing what looks to be a gold-linked issuance of interest bearing notes (more commonly called bonds).

The raw filing as published by Yahoo is the following:

6-Jan-2012

Form 8-K for GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

Exhibits are filed herewith in connection with the issuance of the following debt securities by the Company on January 5, 2012, pursuant to the Company's automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-176914) (the "Registration Statement"):

Read More @ BullMarketThinking.com


Soros Says EU Break-Up Would Be Catastrophic: Report

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 12:10 PM PST

from Reuters.com:

A collapse of the euro and break-up of the European Union would have catastrophic consequences for the global financial system, billionaire investor George Soros was quoted as saying.

"Today, the euro is potentially endangering the political cohesion of the European Union," the Business Line newspaper cited Soros as saying in the south Indian city of Hyderabad.

"If the common currency were to break down, it will lead to the break up of the European Union itself. And this will be catastrophic not only for Europe but also for the global financial system."

The euro zone crisis is "more serious and more threatening than the crash of 2008," the Economic Times reported, quoting Soros.

Read More @ Reuters.com


Rick Ackerman Explains Why the Dollar is Going Up – 01-05-12

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 12:05 PM PST

from The Financial Survival Network:

We interviewed Rick Ackerman yesterday, and he hit us with his prediction that the dollar was headed up. However, he was emphatic this was not an indication of the dollar's fundamental health but rather a sign of the Euro's impending slide. The buck is "The best looking horse in the glue factory." Unfortunately, while misery may enjoy company, it doesn't make anyone any happier.

These are exciting times in which we are living, and there is an end to the major eruptions that we are witnessing. Rick's hidden pivot system can help keep you ahead of the trend and ready for the next Black Swan.

Click Here to Listen to the Interview


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Is There A ‘Best’ Currency To Hold Right Now?

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 11:53 AM PST

by Simon Black, Sovereign Man:

We recently received a great question from a reader, Chuck, who asked, "Simon, I'm going to HK in 10 days to open a bank account, and I know there are options to do this in several foreign currencies. What foreign currency would you recommend to hold over the longer term?"

I could never make a personal recommendation as I'm not a financial advisor, nor do I know the details of your situation. But let's review the options.

First off, Hong Kong is an excellent place to bank. One of the best in the world, in my opinion… and I say that as someone who keeps a lot of money in Hong Kong. Why? Because the banks are strong, stable, innovative, and well-capitalized.

I have far fewer concerns about a bank going under in Hong Kong than I do in the US or Europe. And in Hong Kong, with just a few clicks, I can move money into gold or any number of currencies.

Read More @ SovereignMan.com


Rick Santelli: 2012 Will See Funding Crisis for Many Countries

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 11:43 AM PST

from King World News:

With the dollar breaking to new recent highs, gold starting the new year strong and bonds near all-time highs, today King World News interviewed Rick Santelli, CNBC's Business News on-air Editor. When asked about maturing securities in both the US and Europe in 2012, Santelli responded, "Yes, this is a big one. The best way to make banks in any country healthier is to have outside investors say, 'Wow, this looks good. I want to buy the bonds or I want to buy the banks or I'm taking in deposits.' Remember deposits have fled out of Europe. That's why that big sucking sound, they need those swaps, they need dollars to fund some of these liabilities."

Rick Santelli continues: Read More @ KingWorldNews.com


Hildebrand Affair - Bad All Around

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 11:39 AM PST

Following up on Bruce Krasting's Kashya Hildebrand Speaks – Sinks Hubby? 

 

Hildebrand Affair - Bad All Around

CRONY CENTRAL BANKING

By Ilene 

Recall: Philipp Hildebrand, chief of the Swiss National Bank, denied wrongdoing on Thursday and claimed he had no intention of resigning over the trades. According to Mr. Hildebrand, his former currency trader wife wasn't aware of the Swiss central bank's plans. (SNB chief denies wrongdoing over dollar deals) As Frank Jordans reported,

...Philipp Hildebrand said had acted according to the central bank's internal rules in the U.S. dollar swaps, which came as he was spearheading efforts to lower the value of the Swiss franc.

"I am not aware of having committed any legal error," Hildebrand told reporters at the SNB's headquarters in Zurich. "But I understand that the public is also asking moral questions."

[...]

Hildebrand said he understood that the dollar deals totaling more than $2 million — some of which he said were conducted by his wife — could be misinterpreted and damage his reputation. But he insisted that he would stay on as president as long as he had the support of the SNB's board and Swiss authorities

[...] 

Hildebrand told reporters Thursday that his wife wasn't aware that the central bank would two days later increase the liquidity of the franc, thereby lifting the value of the dollar.

Full article: SNB chief denies wrongdoing over dollar deals  | ajc.com.

Hildebrand insisted he did nothing wrong, but understands why his actions could be "misinterpreted." Apparently, the correct interpretation is that Hildebrand's wife knew nothing, and there should be no presumption otherwise.

The real take home message is a repeat - laws and rules of ethics only apply to some people.

Like who? The Sarasin bank's IT support employee for one. In discovering the trades, he violated Hildebrand's right to secretly conduct currency trades from his private account  broke the laws of Switzerland. The people he gave the information to may have also broken the law. Hildebrand didn't let the travesty go unnoticed, and he "lashed out" at those who leaked details of his and/or his wife's trades. The employee who stole the information has been fired, and Hildebrand is consulting his attorneys about pursuing additional legal action. According to the NY Times:

While expressing regrets, Mr. Hildebrand portrayed the accusation of insider trading as the work of his enemies on the Swiss political right... "The personal attacks against me have reached the point where I had to defend myself," Mr. Hildebrand said.

An information technology worker at Bank Sarasin faces a criminal investigation for allegedly giving the information to the Swiss People's Party, whose most visible leader, Christoph Blocher, has been a bitter critic of Mr. Hildebrand...

Bank Sarasin said Tuesday that it had fired the employee, who had turned himself in to the police in Zurich. The charges carry a maximum sentence of three years in prison.

Exposure to criminal charges should have a chilling effect on anyone who has any thoughts of revealing insider trades from private bank accounts in the future. No worries, because according to the WSJ, "In his first public remarks since the affair broke in late December, Mr. Hildebrand disclosed proposals to increase transparency in financial transactions by top SNB officials."  Good idea. The conflict between laws protecting privacy and laws against insider trading could be largely eliminated by real transparency.

More details from the WSJ (Swiss Banker Says He Won't Resign, Official Denies Advance Knowledge of Wife's Dollar Trade):

Mr. Hildebrand said he only learned of the purchase the day after it was made, but on Thursday said he wasn't "totally surprised," because Ms. Hildebrand had "talked about how low the dollar is and that we should buy more dollars....What I blame myself for is not either reversing the transaction or not telling her not to discuss this."... ["not telling her not to discuss this"??]

Meanwhile Thursday, Zurich's state prosecutor said it has opened a criminal investigation into a former Bank Sarasin & Cie AG employee who is alleged to have passed on Hildebrand family currency-transaction details to the Swiss People's Party, which has been highly critical of the central banker. The leak, which would be a breach of Swiss banking regulations, paved the way for the controversy last December.

While the SNB acts independently of government, its president is elected by the government's Cabinet members. The seven-member Cabinet can remove Mr. Hildebrand if requested to by the central bank's supervisory council. In "Swiss right presses central bank chief to resign," Frank Jordans reported,

Lawmaker Christoph Blocher has demanded a parliamentary inquiry into the whole affair.

The billionaire businessman, who first brought leaked statements of Hildebrand's dollar deals to the attention of the government, said he expected further questionable transactions to surface in a probe.

[...] 

Without naming Blocher, Hildebrand told reporters Thursday that those now engaged in "attacks on me as an individual" were harming the interests of Switzerland...

Zurich prosecutors said Friday they have opened an investigation into a possible breach of banking secrecy by a former Sarasin employee.

The bank said Friday it was also seeking a criminal probe against those who encouraged the unnamed employee and received copies of Hildebrand's confidential documents. (Swiss right presses central bank chief to resign)

These events bring up many questions regarding not only the actions of Mr. Hildebrand and insider trading laws, but also regarding an individual's right to privacy and the public's interest in not discouraging bank employees from revealing private information when it involves potentially illegal activity.  Bruce kindly answered my questions on the latter in red.

1) How far should a right of (bank account) privacy extend to protect public figures from exposure of questionable transactions? ZERO. 

More generally, how should the right of privacy be balanced against the public's right to know of illegal and/or unethical activity? I think there should be full disclosure of financial transactions for elected officials and non elected ones in important positions.

2) What are the details of Sarasin bank's employee finding the trades? He was an IT guy. Not a senior person.

Did he break the law, break only bank regulations, or did he discover the trades through his normal activities? Totally, totally broke the laws of Switzerland. He turned himself into the police. 

Would there be a criminal probe into the employee's conduct if he went straight to the police? Yes. He broke the laws of Switzerland (by getting the information in the first place).

3) What is the basis of the criminal probe directed at "those who encouraged the unnamed employee" to give them confidential documents? 

This is the question of the hour. Which way was it?

(a) An IT guys sees something. He understands what it is and makes a copy of it. Later (through an intermediary), he contacts Blocher who, in turn, takes it to Calmy Rey.

(b) Blocher hires an intermediary and instructs him to get records of Hildebrand's accounts. So an IT guy regularly reviews the account looking for dirt. Bingo! one day he finds it.

I think it was (a); the crime would be (b).

 

[Picture credit: William Banzai]


Shine A Light!

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 11:38 AM PST

There has been so much talk about gold and so little understanding of the reality behind the move in the price of the yellow metal over the last 90 plus days that I think it's necessary to separate the wheat from the chaff. Read More...



Ponzi Planet: The Danger Debt Poses to the Western World

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 11:30 AM PST

"Nothing has changed in the 'locked and loaded' situation since yesterday...and it's just a matter of waiting until gold and silver are allowed to rally a decent amount." [COLOR=#7f4028] Yesterday in Gold and Silver As I mentioned in 'The Wrap' in this column yesterday, the gold price rallied in the Hong Kong afternoon on Thursday...and then got sold off the moment that London began to trade at 8:00 a.m. GMT. This sell-off intensified once the Comex opened at 8:20 a.m. Eastern time...and the low tick of the day came at precisely 9:30 a.m....an hour and ten minutes later....


The Gold Price was Stopped by $1,625 This Week, it Will Charge at this Mark Again Taking Gold to $1,870

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 11:15 AM PST

Gold Price Close Today : 1,616.10
Gold Price Close 30-Dec : 1,565.80
Change : 50.30 or 3.2%

Silver Price Close Today : 2865.30
Silver Price Close 30-Dec : 2787.50
Change : 77.80 or 2.8%

Gold Silver Ratio Today : 56.402
Gold Silver Ratio 30-Dec : 56.172
Change : 0.23 or 0.4%

Silver Gold Ratio : 0.01773
Silver Gold Ratio 30-Dec : 0.01780
Change : -0.00007 or -0.4%

Dow in Gold Dollars : $ 158.10
Dow in Gold Dollars 30-Dec : $ 161.30
Change : $ (3.20) or -2.0%

Dow in Gold Ounces : 7.648
Dow in Gold Ounces 30-Dec : 7.803
Change : -0.15 or -2.0%

Dow in Silver Ounces : 431.37
Dow in Silver Ounces 30-Dec : 438.30
Change : -6.93 or -1.6%

Dow Industrial : 12,359.92
Dow Industrial 30-Dec : 12,217.56
Change : 142.36 or 1.2%

S&P 500 : 1,277.81
S&P 500 30-Dec : 1,257.60
Change : 20.21 or 1.6%

US Dollar Index : 81.264
US Dollar Index 30-Dec : 80.205
Change : 1.059 or 1.3%

Platinum Price Close Today : 1,401.00
Platinum Price Close 30-Dec : 1,393.30
Change : 7.70 or 0.6%

Palladium Price Close Today : 613.20
Palladium Price Close 30-Dec : 649.50
Change : -36.30 or -5.6%

The GOLD PRICE had a strong week and so did the SILVER PRICE, but silver kept not pace. Today gold lost $3.30 (-.2%) to close Comex at 1,616.10 while silver lost 61.2c (-2.1%) to close at 2865.30

Yet, behold the week! GOLD rose 3.2% and SILVER rose 2.8%.

Highs for gold today came at $1,631 and for silver at 2945.2c. Lows were 2862c and 1608.75.

This week $1,625 stopped gold. It will back off, then charge at that same mark again. This rally should take gold to $1,870 at least before it seriously corrects.

Bottom for the GOLD PRICE has probably been seen, for the SILVER PRICE I'm not as sure. Bottoms for both will be behind us by 1 March 2012.

There's a tendency -- not always followed -- for silver and gold to bottom within a few days of each other, which also means the GOLD/SILVER RATIO tops around their bottoms. HOWEVER, sometimes that peak might lag 30 - 60 days as gold stays flat and silver keeps eroding. Ratio will likely repeat that staggered performance, and 'twill be a fall in silver that takes the ratio down sooner than a big rise in gold.

This bottom picking for silver is becoming a risky and unprofitable business. Watch it closely, buy more as it falls. May not see any price below 2622.

This week 2960c stopped silver, but it has held on three days refusing to drop back below 2850c. Break of that 2850c would take silver down a couple of bucks, break of 2960c would take it up two, maybe three bucks.

GOLD PRICE and the SILVER PRICE remain in a primary uptrend (bull market). This correction offers y'all a chance to load your boats again, cheap.

Scoreboard don't lie. Silver and gold had a good week despite the US dollar index's 1.3% gain. Stocks added big time this week, then practiced subtracting, and Friday ended lower than Monday. Palladium got hit on the head with a sledge hammer. Gold/Silver ratio is edging up toward our 57.5 target.

Somebody has floated the rumor out there that "Bernanke is going to devalue the dollar 40%." This reminds me of the man who stands on the front porch with a shotgun, fiercely daring anyone to steal his property while out the back door the thieves are loading his furniture and appliances into a moving van. Since 2001 the US dollar has dropped from 121 to 81, or 33%. While y'all are worrying about the Bernancubus devaluing by 40% SUDDENLY, he and the Greenspan have already devalued it SLOWLY by 33%.

Rumors and internet hysteria -- they merely misdirect your attention from what's important. Wonder what department in the US government is responsible for floating rumors? Disinformation, the Soviets used to call it.

INCOMPREHENSIBLE -- that's what my friend Catherine Fitts warned me today is coming in 2012. What you hear grows more incomprehensible as more and more commentators fail to comprehend what is happening. Economy ain't recovering, cavalry ain't coming but more inflation is. And it mattereth not which of the flyweight nitwit smoothtalkers is elected.

STOCKS today dropped a little, giving up more of this week's gains. Dow closed 12,359.92 55.78 (0.45%) lower than yesterday's close and 37.46 lower than Monday's. S&P500 today closed at 1,277.81, down 3.25 (0.25%).

Stocks may rally before the end of the month as high as 12,600, maybe 200 points higher on a spike, but that will limit it. Rest of the year will fill stock investors with weeping, wailing, teeth-gnashing, and hair-pulling.

US DOLLAR INDEX gained 32.8 basis points today (0-.42%) to 81.264. Dollar has gained 111 basis points in two days, a sign that this week's upside breakout was genuine and has some legs. Should overcome 81.50 early next week and march toward 83.50. Nice Government Men must be puking in their wastebaskets.

Not to mention the European NGM. Euro fell 0.58% today to 1.2713, riding the roller coaster toward 1.2000. Eventually this will cause the US NGM to puke in their wastebaskets, as this competitive currency devaluation (Shades of the Great Depression!) makes US exports dearer. Japanese NGM showed this week they wouldn't abide a rising currency. Closed today 129.93c/Y100 (Y76.96/$1), up 0.19% but contained for the nonce.

Today is Epiphany or the Feast of the Three Kings celebrating the visit of the three magi to the baby Jesus. SPECIAL OFFER

U.S. $5 and $10 modern commemoratives.

These are US $5 and $10 gold commemoratives minted to the ancient standard over the past 20 years.

The US gold $5 commemorative contains 0.2418 oz gold and costs US$404.75 while the US gold $10 commem contains just twice as much gold, 0.4838 oz, and costs US$809.50.

Premium over gold content value for these is a tiny 3.5%.

I will sell lots of Five (5) each $5 gold commems ($404.75 each) for $2,023.75 + $25 shipping = $2,048.75 per lot. A $10 gold counts as two $5 golds, so you can order one $10 and three $5s and that equals five $5s.

I reserve the right to mix the orders as suits me, but have mostly $5s, so you'll most likely get those.

Limit ten (10) lots per customer.

Special Conditions:

First come, first served, and no re-orders at these prices. I will write orders based on the time I receive your e-mail.

We will not take orders for less than the minimums shown above.

All sales on a strict "no-nag" basis. We will ship as soon as your check clears, but we allow Two weeks (14 days) for your check to clear. Calls looking for your order two days after we receive your check will be politely and patiently rebuffed. If you want faster shipping, please send a wire.

Spot gold basis for all prices above is $1,616.10 ORDERING INSTRUCTIONS:

1. You may order by e-mail only to . No phone orders, please.

Your email must include your complete name, address, and phone number. We cannot ship to you without your address. Sorry, we cannot ship outside the United States or to Tennessee.

Repeat, you must include your complete name, address, and phone number. Our clairvoyant quit without warning last week and we can no longer read your mind.

2. Orders are on a first-come, first-served basis until supply is exhausted.

3. "First come, first-served" means that we will enter the orders in the order that we receive them by e-mail.

4. If your order is filled, we will e-mail you a confirmation. If you do not receive a confirmation, your order was not filled.

5. You will need to send payment by personal check or bank wire (either one is fine) within 48 hours. It just needs to be in the mail, not in our hands, in 48 hours.

6. We allow fourteen (14) days for personal checks to clear before we ship. If your hurry is greater than that, you can send a bank wire. Once we ship, the post office takes four to fourteen days to get the registered mail package to you. All in all, you'll see your order in about one month if you send a check.

Y'all enjoy your weekend!

Argentum et aurum comparenda sunt -- -- Gold and silver must be bought.

- Franklin Sanders, The Moneychanger
The-MoneyChanger.com

© 2012,
The Moneychanger. May not be republished in any form, including electronically, without our express permission. To avoid confusion, please remember that the comments above have a very short time horizon. Always invest with the primary trend. Gold's primary trend is up, targeting at least $3,130.00; silver's primary is up targeting 16:1 gold/silver ratio or $195.66; stocks' primary trend is down, targeting Dow under 2,900 and worth only one ounce of gold; US$ or US$-denominated assets, primary trend down; real estate bubble has burst, primary trend down.

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER. Be advised and warned:

Do NOT use these commentaries to trade futures contracts. I don't intend them for that or write them with that short term trading outlook. I write them for long-term investors in physical metals. Take them as entertainment, but not as a timing service for futures.

NOR do I recommend investing in gold or silver Exchange Trade Funds (ETFs). Those are NOT physical metal and I fear one day one or another may go up in smoke. Unless you can breathe smoke, stay away. Call me paranoid, but the surviving rabbit is wary of traps.

NOR do I recommend trading futures options or other leveraged paper gold and silver products. These are not for the inexperienced.

NOR do I recommend buying gold and silver on margin or with debt.

What DO I recommend? Physical gold and silver coins and bars in your own hands.

One final warning: NEVER insert a 747 Jumbo Jet up your nose.


Was 2011 a Dud or a Springboard for Gold?

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 11:07 AM PST

2011 was remarkable in many ways for the precious metals markets. Gold soared to new highs in early September, hitting at an intraday record of $1,920/ounce on the fifth. Silver screamed to within a hair of $50 on April 28. Read More...



Nick Barisheff: $10,000 Gold is Coming! Here?s Why

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 11:05 AM PST

This is not a typical bull market. Gold is not rising in value, but instead, currencies are losing purchasing power against gold and, therefore, gold can rise as high as currencies can fall. Since currencies are falling because of increasing debt, gold can rise as high as government debt can grow. Based on official estimates, America's debt is projected to reach $23 trillion in 2015 and, if its correlation with the price of gold remains the same, the indicated gold price would be $2,600 per ounce. However, if history is any example, it's a safe bet that government expenditure estimates will be greatly exceeded, and [this] rising debt will cause the price of gold to rise to $10,000…over the next five years. (Let me explain further.] Words: 1767.*****So said Nick Barisheff ([URL]http://www.bmgbullion.com/[/URL]) in edited excerpts from a speech* he presented at the Empire Club's 18th Annual Investment Outlook on Thursday, January 5, 2012. I was his guest at the luncheon as editor o...


Mike Maloney on Quantitative Easing, Deflation & 2012 Outlook

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 11:02 AM PST

Mike Discusses, Gold, Silver, U.S.paper dollar supply, Dollar devaluation, Dow/Gold Ratio & More


DOCTORS GOING BROKE

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 11:01 AM PST

I know TBP has several doctor-regulars, and this gets some attention here, but it's much worse than people realize. I mentioned recently the State of Illinois announced a 1 year freeze on making payments to doctors and hospitals for gold-plated union state employees. Medicaid only pays twice a year now, when they get their Federal [...]


Rick Ackerman Explains Why the Dollar is Going Up–01-05-12

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 10:12 AM PST

We interviewed Rick Ackerman yesterday, and he hit us with his prediction that the dollar was headed up. However, he was emphatic this was not an indication of the dollar's fundamental health but rather a sign of the Euro's impending slide. The buck is "The best looking horse in the glue factory." Unfortunately, while misery may enjoy company, it doesn't make anyone any happier.

These are exciting times in which we are living, and there is an end to the major eruptions that we are witnessing. Rick's hidden pivot system can help keep you ahead of the trend and ready for the next Black Swan.

Please send your questions to kl@KerryLutz.com or call us at 347-460-LUTZ.


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

FEAR

Posted: 06 Jan 2012 09:43 AM PST

Synopsis: 

The government is ramping up use of fear to justify massive new bureaucracies and regulations that trample civil liberties. In the face of this sad reality, you have but two options to protect what's rightfully yours.

Dear Reader,

In today's missive, I am going to delve into the topic of fear. For reasons I am hoping to lay out, this matter of fear is critical to all of us in ways most profound. But where to start? This is, after all, no small topic.


The Fear Factor

The definition of fear seems obvious, but only because it is.

As a noun, it refers to "An unpleasant emotion caused by the belief that someone or something is dangerous, likely to cause pain, or a threat."

Used as a verb, it references "Being afraid of someone or something as likely to be dangerous, painful, or threatening."

Moving to the proverbial 50,000-foot view, we humans have an innate capacity to experience the "unpleasant emotion" of fear in myriad ways. While fear is an intensely personal emotion, it can sweep through entire populations, much the same as a herd of gazelles are sent into fearful flight by the scent of a lion.

Unlike a few dozen gazelles foraging on the plains of the Serengeti, however, the technological advancements made by the human ape can result in a population numbering in the hundreds of millions, or even billions, becoming almost simultaneously "afraid of something or someone." While the flash-fire of fear usually won't result in wholesale scampering for cover, á la the always graceful gazelle, it can absolutely result in quick modifications in human behavior on even a global scale.

For example, an economic crisis can cause billions to clamp their wallets tightly shut and refuse to open them until the scent of danger passes.

That said, while fear can be experienced more or less simultaneously by the multitude, per my remarks just above, by definition the emotion is intensely personal and individualized. Simply, the level of fear experienced by each of us, and our response to that fear, will largely depend on the nature of the fear-evoking stimulus and our individual psychology. The aurophobic, for example, is frightened by the presence of gold whereas I suspect most dear readers will experience exactly the opposite emotion. (Think you know how many different phobias there are? You'll think again after reviewing this list.)

With that bit of stage-setting, I will now proceed in what I hope will be a mostly methodical fashion on to the ways that these unpleasant emotions can affect us as a society and, more to the point, on an individual basis.

Institutional Fear

It is no secret to any thinking person that the institutions we humans allow to grow up above us on the societal org chart – governments and religions, to name two of the most prominent – long ago made the calculation that fear equals control.

It is not an accident, in my view, that in the history of most nations, there are no prolonged periods where there isn't some sort of big threat dangling over the populace like the proverbial blade of Damocles.

And if, by some oversight, a government had allowed a lapse in its drumming up of mass fear, the gap is invariably filled by the "always there" threat of fire and brimstone, or its equivalents in the world's many religions.

While it may seem cynical to accuse governments and religions of deliberately unleashing fearful scents into the herd, the historical record is clear on the matter. In fact, the record is so well documented that it must be taken as a standard operating policy. And it has only gotten worse in modernity as the fear-spreading operations of these institutions are made easy in the extreme by a combination of massively improved communications and a media without any ethical reservations when it comes to enthusiastically exaggerating the things we fear in order to gain eyeballs on their pathetic offerings.

But even if you were to take a kinder view toward the PIPs (Ponzis in Power) and assume that their constant concerns are sincerely felt as opposed to callously calculated, the net effect on society is the same. Case in point, Lyndon Johnson was, apparently, completely convinced that victory in Vietnam was the only thing standing between the free world and global communist domination. In his own words, following the end of his presidency:

"I was as sure as a man can could be that if we didn't live up to our commitments in Southeast Asia and elsewhere, [the communists] would exploit the disarray in the United States and in the allies of the Free World."

--Former President Lyndon Johnson

Apparently, he was so convinced in his fears that he used a false report of an attack on US destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin off the coast of North Vietnam as an excuse to ramp the Vietnam conflict into a full-blown war.

Whether Johnson was a part of the falsification of the report might be debatable, but what is not debatable is that on the very night he purported to have received the report, without waiting for any details, he went on national television and announced in terms evoking comparison with FDR following Pearl Harbor that "Aggression by terror against the peaceful villagers of South Vietnam has now been joined by open aggression on the high seas against the United States of America."

The film of his televised speech is available on YouTube, and worth a watch in that he goes into some detail about the attack that never happened. And then, having secured his rationale, Johnson never looks back as he revs up the military-industrial complex to unleash near total war on the backward country, ultimately causing the death of 58,000 young US men, about 30% of whom were drafted against their will and made to serve, and another 300,000 wounded. Then there's the death toll on the other side, which, while the data is debatable, almost certainly runs into the seven figures.

Coincidentally, this morning I received an email from an ex-military officer friend of mine on the topic of Vietnam. I am going to excerpt it here because (a) I found it interesting, and (b) hopefully it will help head off angry emails from those Vietnam vets who still think the cost and the carnage of the war was justified.

I replied to Doug on his Conversations with Casey interview on the new Kim in Korea this week. As it turns out, about twenty years ago, I had dinner with Aaron Bank, the founder of modern Special Forces.  

Pretty tough dude, even though he probably weighed no more than 150 lbs soaking wet in his prime. He had jumped into France during WWII to train the resistance and later went to Indochina to fight the Japanese. It was there that he met Ho Chi Minh, whom he got to know well and apparently found him to be agreeable and very intelligent.

While a communist philosophically, Ho Chi Minh seemed more an anti-colonialist than anything else. He shared with Aaron Bank that more than Marx and Lenin, his true idol was Thomas Jefferson. Furthermore, it was his hope that once the Japanese were drummed out of Indochina, the Americans would support him in getting the French to take their leave as well. Bank reported back to his American superiors that Minh was the likely leader of the inevitable insurgency that would be waged against the French by the Vietnamese, and given the diminishing viability for colonialism, Americans would do well to reach out to Ho Chi Minh and perhaps broker a deal.  

Well, they didn't, and the rest is history, as the saying goes. For their arrogance, the French were rightfully rewarded with a bad case of Dien Bien Flu, and America went on to make every idiotic choice possible in dealing with that region. Watching Colonel Bank look at us (we were about 12 seated at the table) wistfully was a very powerful experience for me as a young officer starting his career with Special Forces. Those were eyes that said "what could have been and what could have been avoided."

But my purpose is not to dwell on the past – because as unfortunate as Vietnam may have been, it is but a speck of dust in the historical record – but rather simply to make the point that not only are governments capable of deliberately propagating fear for their own purposes, they are susceptible to fears of their own… some warranted and some not. In either case, the result can lead to catastrophic miscalculations.

Given more time, we could go on and on evaluating the motives of those people in position to instill fear in the PIPs – for instance, foreign governments looking to hide under the US military umbrella or to protect steady streams of money and other concessions reserved for regional allies. Likewise, the people in the military-industrial complex – which is to say official military and the private concerns that profit so mightily from military operations – have a clear interest in protecting their turf and stirring the pot should they think it necessary to do so.

The fact remains, however, that each of us – including members of government, as hard as it is to believe sometimes – is a member of the same species, and that species is never more than an instant removed from a fear reaction. In other words, we are completely susceptible to becoming fearful at any time, and for a multitude of reasons. This condition does not fade away when a person assumes power. In fact, if anything, it is heightened.

Imagine, if you will, what sort of preparation the military now provides a newly elected president and senior members of his incoming administration, and the sort of fear that preparation might evoke.

On that point, following is an excerpt from the excellent Top Secret America by Dana Priest and William Arkin, describing a mock crisis meeting held for Obama's national security team just before his inauguration.

As they all sat around a large conference table, Obama's national security advisers during the campaign, Richard Clarke and Rand Beers, laid out the scenario: Israel was about to bomb Iran. Discuss.

While they debated next steps, Clarke announced some more bad news: al-Qaeda was carrying a nuclear bomb on a freighter headed for Manhattan. Discuss.

The team forgot about Israel and Iran, and called upon a clandestine U.S. rapid-response team to interdict the ship. But the scenario shifted again: the terrorists had slipped off the freighter and onto a boat. Al-Qaeda was now headed to Boston. Discuss.

Before the team could identify which boat carried the deadly device, they were informed it had been offloaded and detonated. Cities along the eastern seaboard were evacuating. Discuss."

Far be it from me to rationalize the steady missteps of the PIPs, but after going through such an exercise, I'm surprised that the Obama administration's first collective act upon assuming power wasn't to just turn most of the Middle East into a glass-topped parking lot. Is it any wonder the US has a trillion-plus-dollar defense budget?

In my opinion, which will come as no surprise to regular readers, the way to greatly reduce these sorts of institutional fears is to stop running around the world taking sides with petty despots and starting wars. Isolationism? Maybe, maybe not – but it seems like things couldn't get a whole lot more screwed up than they have by following the current policy of widespread meddling.

Pulling sharply back onto the tracks, the point I am trying to make is that fear as both a policy and a policy driver is of no small consequence. Continuing with the US-centric commentary that is an understandable consequence of the geographic accident of my birth, fear has rarely been as big a factor in US policy as it is today.

In addition to the massive military budget that provides funding to huge new entrenched bureaucracies that will resist every attempt at real cuts, I'll also mention:

  • The trashing of the Constitution. I have written enough on this topic – you and I both know the situation, so it doesn't need to be repeated.

  • Economic uncertainty. The policy of constant meddling in the Middle East is only causing things to get more uncertain and unstable.

    Sure, some of the ruling thugs in the area are being chased out – but only to be replaced by a new group of ruling thugs.

    Much of this is happening in and around the world's fuel station, and the situation has the potential to get much, much worse if any one of the sparks now floating in the air of the Middle East – especially those around Iran – touches one of the many piles of powder that have been allowed to build up. At that point the price of oil is going to go ballistic – and if there is one thing a struggling economy can't handle, it is another surge in oil prices. (You can click on the interactive graphic to get some sense of the relationship between oil prices and GDP growth.)

    Interestingly, now that the fires of discontent in the Middle East are burning brightly, the Obama administration has announced that the Pentagon will be shifting its attention to Asia in order to counteract the threat from China. That should be fun.

  • A steady increase in the public's reliance on the government to protect it. A culture of fear inevitably leads to public support for government policies ostensibly designed to protect the citizenry from every possible bogeyman. One result of the ramp-up of fear following September 2001 has been the proliferation of massive new bureaucracies, as well as huge new bodies of regulation that hamper the free movement of people, materials and technology so essential to economic growth. At this point, things have gotten to the point where they are as ridiculous as they are concerning. 

    Case in point, we now have TSA "VIPR" squads setting up security check points here, there and everywhere. This video shows such a checkpoint set up to screen people getting off a train in Savannah, Georgia. Which makes me wonder what they would do to a citizen who refuses to play along? Force them back onto the train? And how is this different, I ask, from the iconic line associated with fascists the world over, namely, "Your papers, please!"? Ultimately, not only is 99% of this dangerous nonsense ineffective, but it is also emasculating to the character of the people. Hey, did you see the latest?

The spread of mandates and discussion of ignition interlocks will "prime the public" for the day when the government requires auto manufacturers to install even more sophisticated alcohol-detection devices as original equipment, Longwell said.

The Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety, funded in part by automakers and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, says it is working on "potential technologies that could detect alcohol from air samples in the vehicle passenger compartment, through the driver's skin using tissue spectroscopy, from emissions through the skin, from eye movements, and from driving performance."

It matters not that drunken-driving fatalities have fallen by half over the last twenty years, the nanny-state meddling will continue apace. And while you could argue that a car that senses when you should drive based on what has been shown to be a largely artificial and dubious standard (a topic for another day) is a good idea, when you look to the government to provide total security in a world that is inherently insecure, you multiply the meddling to the point where you might as well just have the state plug you into the Matrix and be done with it.  

As you know, I could go on, but chances are good I'd just be telling you things you already know. The point, though, is that the build-up of fear-driven policies has been so extreme since September 11, 2001 that we now face the very real potential of a police state-caliber crackdown on the citizenry should another 9/11 occur. And, given the amount of meddling the USG does around the world, such an event could happen anytime.

At least that is my personal fear. Which, conveniently, brings me to the next segment of these musings.

Personal Fears

There is, of course, a feedback loop to the societal fears discussed above. For example, the stampede caused by self-serving NGOs' over-inflated environmental concerns that resulted in a fearful public demanding that governments spend yet more money they don't have on wasteful and often counterproductive subsidies, such as those involved with ethanol and Finland-built electric super cars. However, as mentioned, the need to assess threats and deal with fear is something that each of us have to deal with on a very personal level.

While there is literally no end to the fears that might torment the human mind, I'd like to tackle just a couple of the big ones that I know – from your letters and from your comments when we meet at our events – weigh heavily on the minds of many.

Fear of Government. In his client communications, libertarian defense attorney Marc Victor likens the government to a crazed ape, explaining that job number one for anyone who comes into contact with the crazed ape is to get out of its grasp as quickly as possible. This advice, Mark will tell you, applies to every interaction with the ape – including something as mundane as a routine traffic stop that, should you decide to be confrontational or think it a dandy time  to lecture the officer on your constitutional rights, could end with you bleeding out on the pavement.

Given the wanton trashing of the Constitution in recent years – and the trashing has been done by all three branches of government – you are entirely justified in fearing your government. The question, then, comes down to, "So, what can I do about it?"

Following Marc Victor's advice, the decision tree is fairly simple.

✔ Stay within the easy reach of the crazed ape, but quietly tip-toe through daily life in the hopes of avoiding attention. Should a hairy hand be laid on your shoulder – or, in the case of a TSA pat-down, your groin – make appropriately supplicating sounds (thanking them for protecting you, or even a slight whimper may suffice) and hope they will let you go. Try your hardest to comply cheerfully with all the latest taxes and regulations (I say "try" because at this point, no one can even know what all the regulations say, let alone afford the bevy of legal counsel required for complete compliance) and get on with your life.

✔ Spread the risk. Having all of your assets, and all your personal support systems, within the boundaries of one political regime leaves you and all you own as so much chattel. Diversifying your assets and your life across jurisdictions, if you can afford to do so, will open up new intellectual and lifestyle horizons, as well as provide you with the peace of mind that should the crazed apes in one country become especially frenzied, you can more readily step out of reach.

    There really aren't any other options, making your decision on how to cope with this particular fear actually quite simple. So, make your choice and fall in line with it and stop worrying so much.

    Personally, I choose the latter.

    Economic Outlook. We investors have any number of fears related to the economic outlook, many of which are overlapping. Again, these fears are justified, for the simple reason that serious bouts of inflation, deflation or depression can literally wipe out the personal assets we have spent a lifetime of hard work accumulating. Though the government is capable of taking abrupt actions that result in near instantaneous wealth destruction, the persistent effects of a serious economic crisis – which are almost always also the result of government meddling – can be just as devastating, albeit over a somewhat longer period of time.

    How do you cope with fears over the future of the economy? For starters, by facing the facts. For example, while we here at Casey Research have a very respectable track record of forecasting economic trends – as often as not by analyzing the most likely actions a government will take, and the most likely consequences of those actions – the truth of the matter is that no one can predict the future.

    Let that sink in, because it's really important.

    Thus, while we believe that the logical consequence of any fiat m


    Follow the Management Names: Taylor MacDonald

    Posted: 06 Jan 2012 09:17 AM PST

    The Gold Report: Taylor, many investors are confused by today's unpredictable market. Are you as confused as most market observers? Taylor MacDonald: We have come to expect the unpredictability. Since 2008 volatility has become the new norm. You have to learn how to protect yourself in these hazardous times. TGR: How has 2011 tested your bag of investment tricks? TM: We focus on the long term, taking large positions in smaller companies. We look for unique assets, strong management teams and structure. In the past couple of years, we have learned to stick to our knitting, to what we do best. TGR: And what would you say you do best? TM: Our strength is identifying undervalued opportunities in the precious metals, energy, commodities and technology sectors. We like to find what I call concept companies early on. If necessary, we will provide whatever help we can to management teams as the investment theses unfold. For example, Ridgeline Energy Services Inc. (RLE:TSX.V) went from...


    Nigel Farage - Gold to See Its Biggest Spike in 2012

    Posted: 06 Jan 2012 09:07 AM PST

    there is a fundamental imbalance between the members of the eurozone and the whole thing is going to go bust anyway.


    Commodity Convergence And Debt-Equity Divergence

    Posted: 06 Jan 2012 08:39 AM PST

    Equities traded at their lowest volume of the week (-19% from yesterday alone) as S&P futures volumes remain 35% below medium-term averages. The NFP print this morning provided ammunition for some vol early on but as we drifted into the European close, risk assets in general were pushing lower. Unlike the last few days the circa-Europe-close dip-and-rip only occurred in the equity market today as the USD stayed near its highs and TSYs near their low yields of the day (and high yield credit near its wides of the day) as stocks took off back into the green and meandered either side of VWAP for the afternoon. It seems odd that the afternoon's divergence between TSYs and stocks was not accompanied by Gold or USD weakness (QE hopes) and in fact as we got into the last few minutes, stocks started to push back lower on much larger average trade size but was trapped between VWAP and unchanged on the day. Gold outperformed on the week (+3.4%) just inching out Silver and Oil as they appeared to converge on a 3x beta of the USD 'appreciation' of around 1.2% this week. Treasuries rallied 4-6bps and the curve flattened overall as we saw duration reduction in corporate bonds (with highest quality names (Aaa-Aa3) being net sold). DXY stayed above 81 as the EURUSD scrambled back above 1.27 (down an impressive 1.85% on the week). AUD was the only major to gain relative to the USD on the week (and very marginally). Finally, we saw VIX dropping and stabilize and implied correlation diverged and rose this afternoon which combined with the divergence in risk assets suggests some stocks are short-term overdone at best.

    The USD (DXY) remained at its highs (green inverted) and Treasuries (red near their low yields of the day) as stocks (blue) pushed up post Europe and clung to VWAP and practically unchanged.

    Overall ES (the S&P 500 e-mini futures contract) outperformed/diverged from broad risk assets as correlations (above) broke down to very low levels in the afternoon.

    High yield credit (red) and HYG (the high yield bond ETF in green) underperformed with a late day dive in the latter actually pulling overall stock-vol-rate-credit risk into better correspondence (as seen below in the SPY Arb framework) on a strangely quiet day. Once again it looks like HYG was used to try to spark a risk-on rally (the outperformance of 'Model' below) but this failed as major volume and selling pressure hit HYG into the close.

    Gold and Silver drifted lower this afternoon after modest rallies early on as Oil pulled higher to a somewhat coincidental convergence of these three economic/QE sensitive commodities for the week. Copper came and went with the USD revaluation on the week ending just down YTD.

    The dollar strength was impressive this week and should be very worrisome for corporate earnings in our humble opinion if it is maintained (especially with Oil not dropping on USD strength). The shape of moves this week suggests where the EUR selling pressure is coming from - Europe - as we suspect global investors try and creep through those narrow doors as they reduce exposure to the haircut-facing nations across the pond.

    Evidently that real money exiting Europe seems to be coming from both financials and sovereign bonds as we saw Belgium, Austria, and Spain all see very significant decompression this week, let alone France.

     

     

    Finally we note that implied correlation (a measure of the relative demand for macro risk protection versus micro name protection) elevated all afternoon as VIX (3rd month futures) drifted lower and stabilized. We have shown this divergence a number of times and it has often presaged short-term weakness in stocks.

     

    For now, it is enough to note that macro protection is much more bid than talking heads discussions of VIX falling would have you believe and the divergences between stocks and risk assets in general add to the concern on getting too excited at this week's performance - especially in financials (remember the CDS arb technicals and short squeeze potential).

     

    Charts: Bloomberg and Capital Context


    Why Rising Debt Will Lead to $10,000 Gold

    Posted: 06 Jan 2012 08:37 AM PST

    Good afternoon, it's a pleasure to speak about gold at this Outlook for 2012. Today, I'd like to focus on one important idea: the direct relationship between the rising price of gold and the rising levels of government debt ... Read More...



    Silver Confirms the Bullish Outlook for Precious Metals

    Posted: 06 Jan 2012 08:37 AM PST

    Overall, the situation appears to be quite bullish since long-term indicators carry more weight than short-term signals.


    Whenever you see gold trading below its 200 Day Moving Average, consider it a buy signal!

    Posted: 06 Jan 2012 08:33 AM PST

    During the 12 year history of this bull market in gold, only about 5% of the time did we see gold trading below its 200DMA, and each time it turned out to be a prime buying opportunity. (Charts courtesy Stockcharts.com unless indicated). Featured is the daily gold chart. The last time gold traded below its 200DMA was during the autumn of 2008. As soon as the price climbed back above the 200DMA, it rose from $900 to $1,900. The fundamentals for gold are bullish enough for a repeat performance. Just make sure you are buying gold and not a ‘paper or digital substitute’ for gold. This chart courtesy Jagadeesh Gokhal, shows the fundamentals for gold quite clearly. Since tax revenues are inadequate to cover these liabilities, the central banks do what they’ve always done – they’ll print! “In the distance, I see a frightful storm brewing in the form of un-tethered government debt. I choose the words –“frightful ...


    “The whole thing is terrifying.”

    Posted: 06 Jan 2012 08:31 AM PST

    Nigel Farage – Gold to See Its Biggest Spike in 2012  


    How Central Bankers Attempt to “Cure” Insolvency

    Posted: 06 Jan 2012 08:30 AM PST

    Like trying to patch a nuclear reactor with scotch tape and chewing gum, the central banks of the world's leading economies are trying to Spackle over cracks in the global monetary system with a variety of desperate tactics and measures.

    Unfortunately, hiding the cracks does nothing to strengthen the underlying infrastructure. To the contrary, hiding the cracks dupes individuals into believing all is well, even as the monetary system is crumbling around them.

    Many European governments, for example, are spending much more money than they can possibly confiscate through taxation. These guys are broke… plain and simple. But so is the United States, based on any intellectually honest assessment of the facts.

    According to the US Treasury's own data, the US ended 2011 with total debt of $15.2 trillion, which means the US debt-to-GDP is now more than 100%! Move over Greece! Make way for Uncle Sam.

    Bankrupt governments usually default…at least they used to. In the modern era of faith-based currencies and Ivy League educated central bankers, bailouts and shell games are the cogs and wheels that drive the global monetary machinery. But this machinery does not actually power anything…other than a massive fraud. It merely sputters along, chugging out massive plumes of toxic theories and misguided manipulations.

    And whenever a central bank cannot provide direct, overt assistance to a specific insolvent investment bank or government, not to worry, a central bank can still provide indirect, covert assistance.

    The recently announced "backdoor bailout" of European financial institutions illustrates the point. The European Central Bank (ECB) cannot directly bail out the insolvent governments of Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, et al. Meanwhile, the US Federal Reserve cannot directly rescue Europe's insolvent banks.

    Enter the indirect bailouts… Here's how they work:

    The Fed extends unlimited lines of credit to the ECB under so-called swap agreements. The ECB, in turn, provides dirt-cheap capital to Europe's struggling banks. Then, the banks — understanding an unspoken quid pro quo — use the dirt-cheap financing to buy the high-yielding bonds of Greece, Italy, Spain, et cetera.

    So if you follow the money, the Fed is lending money to Greece… and all along the way, the insolvent European banks are making money they don't deserve to make, while taxpayers lose money they don't deserve to lose… and also stand first in line to lose even more money as these various coddled banks and governments eventually default anyway.

    Does this characterization of the Fed's activities sound like an exaggeration?

    Consider this fact, courtesy of The Wall Street Journal: As recently as a few weeks ago, the amount of dollar swaps — i.e., loans — with the ECB was only $2.4 billion. "For the week ending December 14, however, the amount jumped to $54 billion," the Journal reports. "For the week ending December 21, the total went up by [another] $8 billion… No matter the legalistic interpretation, the Fed is, working through the ECB, bailing out European banks and, indirectly, spendthrift European governments. It is difficult to count the number of things wrong with this arrangement."

    Thus far, the Fed's indirect bailout of Europe is relatively small, at a mere $62 billion. But we should expect that number to grow…a lot. And as that number grows, the Federal Reserve will be providing yet one more reason to buy gold, silver and other hard assets.

    No modern central banker can seem to resist the urge to "cure" insolvency with more credit — credit that comes not from a store of accumulated capital, but from the mouth of a printing press.

    Gold is a buy, perhaps now more than ever.

    "2011's close for gold marks the 11th year for higher year-end gold closing," observes Richard Russell. "To my knowledge, this is the longest bull market of any kind in history in which each year's close was above the previous year. This fabulous bull market will not end with a whisper and a fizzle. I continue to believe that the upside gold crescendo of this bull market lies ahead. We are watching market history. Below are the last day of the year quotes for gold:

    2000 — $273.60
    2001 — $279.00
    2002 — $348.20
    2003 — $416.10
    2004 — $438.40
    2005 — $518.90
    2006 — $638.00
    2007 — $838.00
    2008 — $889.00
    2009 — $1096.50
    2010 — $1421.40
    2011 — $1566.80

    "I note the frustration and anger of the anti-gold crowd," Russell continues. "To miss twelve years of rising prices is enough to make any investor furious with himself. I would guess that 99 percent of Americans have never participated in the gold bull market. Thus, sour grapes is the sentiment of the gold-haters…"

    But there's no sense being "a hater" or to continue sucking sour grapes. If the gold bull market is merely resting, rather than dying, there will be plenty of opportunity to become a gold-lover.

    "Jeff Clark, editor of the S&A Short Report, sees the best opportunity to trade gold stocks of the past three years," the S&A Digest reports. "After the end-of-the-year rout in the sector, one of Jeff's favorite indicators dropped to its lowest level since October 2008 — one of the most pessimistic times in history for gold stocks. But after the indicator flashed 'buy' (as it is doing today), the average gold stock doubled over the next 10 weeks.

    "Take a look at this chart of the gold sector bullish percent index, which shows the past two times Jeff's indicator flashed buy (in June and October of last year)… Gold stocks rallied 20% over the following month in both instances."

    The Gold Miners Percent Bullish Index Hits Lowest Level in 3 Years

    Longer term, the precious metals seem even more compelling.

    "Gold stocks will have a great year," predicts Chris Mayer, editor of Mayer's Special Situations. "The market hated gold stocks in 2011, especially the juniors. The MarketVectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) is made up of small mining stocks. It fell 38% in 2011. This, despite gold itself finishing the year modestly up.

    "Brigus Gold (BRD), for example, is dirt-cheap," Chris continues. "In 2012, it is still targeting 100,000 ounces of production from its Black Fox mine. In the meantime, during 2011, Brigus boosted the total resource at Black Fox by 50% with high-grade ore extensions. So, the stock is now very cheap on reserves and trades for about 4x prospective cash flow at 100,000 ounces… So even if it gets a peer multiple of 8x, the stock could double. And that's if gold goes nowhere!

    "The market is offering low multiples on gold stocks right now," Chris winds up. "Price-to-cash-flow multiples, for instance, linger near generational lows. Gold doesn't have to go up for these stocks to make a lot of money. However, I think gold will make another run at $2,000 an ounce in 2012 — and exceed it. All the factors that drove gold to new highs in 2011 are still in place. The world's monetary system is still a mess. And its leading brand, the US dollar, is not well. Combine a rising gold price with low multiples and you have a kind of financial rocket fuel."

    Eric Fry
    for The Daily Reckoning

    How Central Bankers Attempt to "Cure" Insolvency originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.


    Physical Silver Surges To Record 30% Premium Over Spot, In Backwardation

    Posted: 06 Jan 2012 08:28 AM PST

    One of the main reasons why we have been not so focused on paper representations of real currencies, gold & silver) is that ever since the MF Global debacle


    Gold Daily and Silver Weekly Charts - Rounding Errors In the Big Scheme of Things

    Posted: 06 Jan 2012 08:20 AM PST


    This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

    No comments:

    Post a Comment