A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Gold World News Flash

Gold World News Flash


Silver in Giant Flag or Pennant Formation

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 05:51 PM PST

Got Gold Report Consolidation staging for resolution likely just ahead. Largest futures traders positioned for one direction – up – are they right? HOUSTON -- In our linked charts for subscribers we noted this past weekend that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) commitments of traders report for silver (COT) remains more bullish than bearish. We put notations directly into the charts we share with Vultures (Got Gold Report Subscribers) so they can read at a glance our impressions of the COT action. The main reason for that more bullish than bearish “read” is because the traders the CFTC classes as “commercial,” which includes bullion banks and swap dealers combined, are presently at a very low level of “net shortness.” Not everyone does, but we subscribe to the theory that the collective positioning of the largest futures traders on the planet is a kind of window into their expectations for the price....


Why Gold Stocks Have Underperformed and What Lies Ahead

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 05:43 PM PST

Gold is higher by 20% this year but the large cap gold stocks (GDX) are down 6% while the junior gold stocks (ETF) are down 25%. With Gold higher by 20%, we’d normally expect the gold stocks to be up 50% and more. Needless to say 2011 has been a difficult year for gold bugs. Its been a near disaster for most junior gold stocks. That being said, there are important but often ignored reasons why the gold shares have underperformed this year and reasons to consider why a big move may be only months away. First, we have to understand that gold mining is a very difficult business. The law of numbers makes it even more difficult for the largest producers. They have to operate multiple mines and then continuously acquire or find new resources to maintain reserves and maintain production levels into the future. It’s a difficult business regardless of where the Gold price is. Hence, mining stocks do not outperform Gold over time whether in a bull market or not. The fo...


Gold loses battle for $1750- needs to push through $1765

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 05:23 PM PST

[url]http://www.traderdannorcini.blogspot.com/[/url] [url]http://www.fortwealth.com/[/url] The failure by Ol' Yeller to extend past $1750 has tripped some of the shorter term technical indicators into a sell mode. As you can from looking at the blue downtrend line, Gold cannot seem to extend past this line. The positive is that it is also holding the uptrending red support line with the result being a tightening pattern or almost a type of coil that is forming. Gold bulls need to watch this carefully as a failure to hold above $1650 will send the metal very quickly towards the $1600 level where it must find active buying to prevent a deeper setback in price which could potentially take it first towards $1550 and even towards the $1500 level should it fail to hold there. A push back through $1765 turns the chart pattern friendly with only a closing push through $1800 allowing for the resumption of a strong uptrending pattern and a test of the all time high. All eyes in gold are on E...


Rick Rule - Flight to Quality & 2012 Gold Takeovers

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 04:01 PM PST

With gold remaining firm near the $1,700 level, oil over $100 a barrel and S&P putting 15 European nations on negative credit watch, today King World News interviewed one of the most street smart pros in the resource sector, Rick Rule, Founder of Global Resource Investments. When asked about the latest move by S&P putting many European nations on negative credit watch, including France and Germany, Rule replied, "It's astonishing. Obviously the rating agency's perceptions have changed fairly drastically in the last couple of years. I think what probably precipitated this, Eric, had to do with the failed bond auction in Germany. The market may have been telling the rating agency something that the rating agencies didn't already understand."


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Gold Seeker Closing Report: Gold and Silver Fall Over 1%

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 04:00 PM PST

Gold fell $17.60 to $1728.40 by about 8AM EST before it bumped back up to almost unchanged at $1745.30 in the next two hours of trade, but it then fell back off for most of the rest of the day and ended near its late session low of $1717.73 with a loss of 1.41%. Silver rose to as high as $32.981 by midmorning in New York before it also fell back off in late trade and ended near its late session low of $31.84 with a loss of 1.84%.


The Chart That Proves The Fed's Policies Have Been A Failure

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 03:39 PM PST

A few days ago we presented an analysis by ConvergEx showing that due to the very close historical correlation between home prices and employment, it is the Fed's view that the only way to stimulate employment (aside from such BLS shennanigans as pretending that despite the natural growth of the labor force by 90k a month to keep up with population, those willing to work are in fact declining) is to raise home prices. Raising home prices be definition means either reducing supply - an event which is proving impossible with shadow inventory in the millions and rising, even as thousands of new delinquent mortgages appear each day while homebuilders keep on chugging out new homes that remain vacant for years, or increasing demand. It is the latter that the Fed targets, by attempting to make mortgage rates ever cheaper via LSAP, Operation Twist or other Treasury curve interventions that attempt to push down long-dated yields ever lower. This works in theory. In practice, however, as the chart below demonstrates, the Fed's entire ZIRP-targeting policy over the past several years has been one abysmal failure (for everyone expect those with immediate access to the Fed's zero interest rate capital - i.e., the Primary Dealers). As proof of this we present the following chart, which maps the SAAR in New Home Sales against the 30 Year Fannie Cash Mortgage. What appears very clearly on this chart is that despite ever declining mortgage rates, there is simply no interest in home turnover, and sales are at record low levels due to lack of demand, and lack of desire to sell into a bidless market, in essence causing the entire housing market to halt.

And this makes intuitive sense: the bulk of home owners who can take advantage of cheap credit are those who already have a mortgage and at best will refi into a cheaper one. For everyone else, either the bank's admissions criteria are too stringent, or the potential borrower is simply convinced that a year from today, the 30 Year mortgage rate will be another 1% lower (most likely with 100% justification). As such there is absolutely no drive to naturally restart the housing market (one can commence here a discussion of how central planning destroys every market it infect like a lethal virus, but we will spare that for another, more preachy night). For now we will leave you with this chart which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the Fed's primary mandate: to lower the unemployment rate (by boosting home prices) has been a failure.

This also means that the ovecompensating academic idiots of Marriner Eccles will do next what is a perfectly logical next step for a cabal of deviant misfits hell bent on bending the world to their will: devalue the US currency to a point that "compensates" for their failure in the housing market. And that they can and will do. Even if it means dumping crisp hundred dollar bills out of helicopters.


The Chart That Proves The Fed's Policies Have Been A Failure

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 03:39 PM PST


A few days ago we presented an analysis by ConvergEx showing that due to the very close historical correlation between home prices and employment, it is the Fed's view that the only way to stimulate employment (aside from such BLS shennanigans as pretending that despite the natural growth of the labor force by 90k a month to keep up with population, those willing to work are in fact declining) is to raise home prices. Raising home prices be definition means either reducing supply - an event which is proving impossible with shadow inventory in the millions and rising, even as thousands of new delinquent mortgages appear each day while homebuilders keep on chugging out new homes that remain vacant for years, or increasing demand. It is the latter that the Fed targets, by attempting to make mortgage rates ever cheaper via LSAP, Operation Twist or other Treasury curve interventions that attempt to push down long-dated yields ever lower. This works in theory. In practice, however, as the chart below demonstrates, the Fed's entire ZIRP-targeting policy over the past several years has been one abysmal failure (for everyone expect those with immediate access to the Fed's zero interest rate capital - i.e., the Primary Dealers). As proof of this we present the following chart, which maps the SAAR in New Home Sales against the 30 Year Fannie Cash Mortgage. What appears very clearly on this chart is that despite ever declining mortgage rates, there is simply no interest in home turnover, and sales are at record low levels due to lack of demand, and lack of desire to sell into a bidless market, in essence causing the entire housing market to halt.

And this makes intuitive sense: the bulk of home owners who can take advantage of cheap credit are those who already have a mortgage and at best will refi into a cheaper one. For everyone else, either the bank's admissions criteria are too stringent, or the potential borrower is simply convinced that a year from today, the 30 Year mortgage rate will be another 1% lower (most likely with 100% justification). As such there is absolutely no drive to naturally restart the housing market (one can commence here a discussion of how central planning destroys every market it infect like a lethal virus, but we will spare that for another, more preachy night). For now we will leave you with this chart which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the Fed's primary mandate: to lower the unemployment rate (by boosting home prices) has been a failure.

This also means that the ovecompensating academic idiots of Marriner Eccles will do next what is a perfectly logical next step for a cabal of deviant misfits hell bent on bending the world to their will: devalue the US currency to a point that "compensates" for their failure in the housing market. And that they can and will do. Even if it means dumping crisp hundred dollar bills out of helicopters.


Silver bullish on chart and in diminished bullion bank short position, Arensberg writes

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 03:17 PM PST

11:15p ET Monday, December 5, 2011

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold (and Silver):

The Got Gold Report's Gene Arensberg likes what he sees in silver's price chart -- a bullish pennant -- and in a very low short position by the big market-rigging bullion banks. Arensberg's new report is headlined "Silver in Giant Flag or Pennant Formation" and you can find it at the Got Gold Report here:

http://www.gotgoldreport.com/2011/12/silver-in-giant-flag-or-pennant-for...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Be Part of a Chance to Discover
Multi-Million-Ounce Gold and Silver Deposits in Canada

Northaven Resources Corp. (TSX-V:NTV) is advancing five gold and silver projects in highly prospective and politically stable British Columbia, Canada.

Check out the exploration program on our Allco gold/silver project :

-- A large (13,000 hectare) property, covering more than 15 square kilometers of a regional mineralized trend just 3km from a recently announced 1.2-million-ounce gold and 15-million-ounce silver deposit.

-- The property hosts historic high-grade silver workings and many mineral showings as well as former mines at the property's northern and southern boundaries.

-- A deep-penetrating airborne geophysics survey has just been completed on the entire property and neighboring deposits and its results are eagerly awaited.

To learn more about the Allco property or Northaven's other gold and silver projects, please visit:

http://www.northavenresources.com

Or call Northaven CEO Allen Leschert at 604-696-3600.



Join GATA here:

Vancouver Resource Investment Conference
Sunday-Monday, January 22-23, 2012
Vancouver Convention Centre West
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

http://cambridgehouse.com/conference-details/vancouver-resource-investme...

California Investment Conference
Saturday-Sunday, February 11-12, 2012
Hyatt Grand Champions Resort
Indian Wells, California, USA

http://cambridgehouse.com/conference-details/california-investment-confe...

Support GATA by purchasing a silver commemorative coin:

https://www.amsterdamgold.eu/gata/index.asp?BiD=12

Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

The United States Once Again Can Establish
a Stable Dollar Worth Its Weight in Gold

Lewis E. Lehrman, chairman of the Lehrman Institute, sponsor of The Gold Standard Now project, has released a plan to restore economic growth through a stable dollar.

The plan, titled "The True Gold Standard: A Monetary Reform Plan Without Official Reserve Currencies," responds to the recurrent economic crises of the last century and outlines a detailed proposal for America's leadership on "how we get from here to there." That is, how we get from the present unstable paper dollar to a stable dollar as good as gold.

James Grant, author and editor of Grant's Interest Rate Observer, says of the Lehrman plan: "If you have ever wondered how the world can get from here to there -- from the chaos of depreciating paper to a convertible currency worthy of our children and our grandchildren -- wonder no more. The answer, brilliantly expounded, is between these covers. America has long needed a modern Alexander Hamilton. In Lewis E. Lehrman the country has finally found him."

To learn more and to sign up for The Gold Standard Now's free, noncommercial, weekly report, "Prosperity through Gold," please visit:

http://www.thegoldstandardnow.org/gata



Is the US$ in Danger of Losing its Reserve Currency Status?

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 02:40 PM PST

A week seldom goes by without us reading somewhere that the US dollar is in danger of losing its reserve currency status. We are now going to argue that the US$ is actually in no such danger, because it can't lose what it doesn't have. Read More...



The Worst In The World – The U.S. Balance Of Trade Is Mind-Blowingly Bad

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 01:52 PM PST

from The Economic Collapse Blog:

Did you know that we buy about a half a trillion dollars more stuff from the rest of the world than they buy from us? The U.S. balance of trade is not only mind-blowingly bad – it is the worst in the world. It is being projected that the U.S. trade deficit for 2011 will be 558.2 billion dollars. That would be an increase of more than 11 percent from last year. As I have written about previously, the United States is the worst in the world at a lot of things, but as far as the economic well-being of our nation is concerned, our balance of trade is particularly important. Every single month, far more money goes out of this country than comes into it. Tax revenues are significantly reduced as all of this money gets sucked out of our communities. The federal government, state governments and local governments borrow gigantic piles of money to try to make up the difference, but all of this borrowing just makes our debt problems a whole lot worse. In the end, no amount of government debt is going to be able to cover over the fact that our national economic pie is shrinking. We are continually consuming far more wealth than we produce, and that is a recipe for economic disaster.

Read More @ TheEconomicCollapseBlog.com


Euro Crisis Destabilizing the Dollar

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 12:40 PM PST

In response to pressure from Wall Street, the White House and central banks in Europe, the Federal Reserve last week drastically cut interest rates for currency swaps to benefit troubled European banks.  This will flood world markets with more dollars and will soon mean rising prices for every American at the grocery store.  This extra liquidity will temporarily ease the cash crunch for irresponsible bankers, but in the long run it will make the situation much worse for consumers all over the world.  Equities markets registered big gains at the news, but only for a day.  Make no mistake - this is not capitalism, and this is not how a free market operates.  In a free market, bankruptcies happen, even to large banks.  We must remember, free markets are the true and best regulators of financial mismanagement. By contrast, under our current form of special interest corporatism certain businesses are granted too-big-to-fail status and are never allowed t...


Signature Trends - In Summary

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 12:40 PM PST

[CENTER]Monthly Cycle Trends in the XAU[/CENTER] In case you missed it here, the Market Pendulum SRA monthly cycle indicator just barely came off the bottom on the very last day of November after being undecided all month. This important monthly chart demonstrates a 5 year record. Since the bull market began in 2000, it has not missed a trick from these low levels (zero). As mentioned before, the SRA is extraordinarily accurate in the longer time frames. Unfortunately, one must wait a month for concrete confirmation in this time frame. If valid, it suggests a multi-month advance. [CENTER] Gold/Silver Reserves and Dividend Trends [/CENTER] Sprott put out an appeal for silver companies to hold a portion of their production as a reserve. Of course, if Sprott gets his way, some of these companies are going to have valuable and stronger assets on their balance sheets over time. This clearly is much better diversification than straight cash reserves or other external investments.Coeur...


Endgame

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 12:38 PM PST

by Chris Horlacher, MapleLeafMetals.ca:

"There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved."

The above quote, by Ludwig von Mises, should be burned in to the heads of every economist on the face of the earth because it accurately describes exactly what happens to economies after prolonged attempts by government to meddle with society through the monetary system. The theory that this quote is derived from, the Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT), has enjoyed a track record of success in predicting every major economic crises since it was developed. In applying this quote to our present situation, I suppose the first questions we should ask is "Did we experience a boom brought about by credit expansion?"

The following charts answer that question quite definitively:

Read More @ MapleLeafMetals.ca


The Gold Price Closed 0.9% Lower, Will The Supports Continue to Hold?

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 11:22 AM PST

Gold Price Close Today : 1730.70
Change : (16.30) or -0.9%

Silver Price Close Today : 3230.6
Change : (31.5) cents or -1.0%

Gold Silver Ratio Today : 53.572
Change : 0.018 or 0.0%

Silver Gold Ratio Today : 0.01867
Change : -0.000006 or 0.0%

Platinum Price Close Today : 1520.70
Change : -27.00 or -1.7%

Palladium Price Close Today : 631.85
Change : -10.65 or -1.7%

S&P 500 : 1,257.08
Change : 12.80 or 1.0%

Dow In GOLD$ : $144.50
Change : $ 2.29 or 1.6%

Dow in GOLD oz : 6.990
Change : 0.111 or 1.6%

Dow in SILVER oz : 374.48
Change : 6.02 or 1.6%

Dow Industrial : 12,097.83
Change : 78.41 or 0.7%

US Dollar Index : 78.61
Change : 0.038 or 0.0%

The GOLD PRICE and SILVER PRICE took the biggest hit on the European news. Gold dropped $16.30 (0.9%) to $1,730.70 on Comex, while silver dropped 31.5c (1%) to close 3230.6c.

All right, I'm going to crawl out on that limb. I think today's drop in GOLD and SILVER was a mere reaction to the last few days' highs, and that the bottom boundary of the triangle for silver (3150c) and of the trading channel for gold ($1,690 - $1,700) will hold. Plainly, if they break those supports, they will tank, but I think they will hold. At least, they did today, with silver posting a low at 3185c and gold at 1,717.67 (protecting that $1,720 support).

But up or down, I have run my nose slam up against that wall again: what else can I trust but silver and gold? Government promises? The stock market, locked in a bear trend? Banks??! Banks, who'd as soon throw you out of the lifeboat into a swarm of chummed sharks as I would step on a bug?

Mercy! I reckon I'll take my chances with the GOLD and SILVER, and even if they drop 20 or 40%, I'll still have 'em where I can rub on 'em to console myself.

Y'all do what seemeth good to you, but I smell a trap, and I'm not going to wait around to make sure I've identified the right stench.

To my chagrin I have neglected a subject, I just discovered last night. Oh, I knew it was going on, and always suspected that your wonderful government would pull it on y'all's pension funds and IRAs, etc., but today it has drawn one step fearfully closer.

I'm talking about government confiscating pension funds -- y'all's pension funds -- to dig out of their debt swamp. Argentina did it a few years ago, Hungary last year, and Ireland is eyeing 24 bn euros in their National Pension Reserve fund right now.

US government debt = $15 trillion. US pension fund assets = $16 trillion. Y'all see any similarity there? Anything click in your mind?

Add to other precedents Portugal today, which transferred 5.6 bn euros of private pension funds to itself to meet its budget deficit.

And somebody explain to me, in the face of all this precedents, how the US government (ever trustworthy) would not do the same? All that time folks have wasted worrying about gold being seized as it was in 1934 have been watching the front door of the house while the burglars were unloading the furniture through the back door.

Y'all know I am no alarmist, and I reserve my most lip-curling contempt for all those Internet Chicken Littles who every day see the sky falling.

This warning is nothing new with me. The government seized gold in 1934 for the same reason that Willie Sutton robbed banks: that's where the money was. In 2011 the money isn't there, it's in pension assets,

IRAs, 401(k)s, pensions, all the rest.

For years when people have asked me what they should do with their IRAs, my threshold remark has been, "First, you have to decide if you want to continue in a partnership with the US government. Ownership has two parts, title and control. With your IRA or 401(k), you have title, but they have control. Yes, you will pay a penalty and tax to withdraw it, but how much is control, in your own hands, worth to you?"

From long experience I know that not 1 out of 80 will choose to cash out his IRA, so powerful is the APPEARANCE that all the money is yours. ME, I don't want any part of any partnership with the yankee government. I'll take my licks AND my money, thank you very much.

But I am nothing but a paranoid natural born fool from Tennessee. I will not, however, stand in the middle of the railroad tracks when an express train is barrelling down on me, driven by a maniac.

Now y'all can put that IRA into silver and gold, but it is still in an IRA, and a trustee holds it, not you. If you simply MUST keep your IRA, then put it into physical silver or gold. But you ought to consider most earnestly, together with your spouse, which is more important, mere title to the IRA, or control.

Sarcophagus of France and Ferkel of Germany met today and after lunch announced a list of recommendations for changes to the euro treaty, namely, automatic sanctions against deficit violating countries, debt limits written into member constitutions, and no more haircuts for creditors (save those holding Greek paper).

Look deeply into it: this will established centralized budget oversight in Brussels. This is the nightmare turn, and most of all IT CONTAINS NO SOLUTION TO THE ALREADY UNPAYABLE DEBT. No solution, that is, except inflating it away, but thru the ECB rather than individual nations. Don't let all those German protestations about not making the ECB lender of last resort. If they are going to pay all that unpayable Himalaya of debt, they can only inflate it away. All other explanations are mere carpeting for the barnyard.

The European announcement shaved 79 basis points off the spread between Italian and German debt almost immediately. That indicates that a lot of investors took the bait. I remind you that even if all power is centralized in Brussels, the debt remains still too large to be paid. Investors have been suckered.

Dow today gained 78.14 points (0.65%) to close at 12,097.83. Maybe that's a case of buy the rumor, sell the news. S&P 500 closed up 12.8 (1.03%) at 1,257.08.

My upper limit on the Dow is about 12,200. It's at that wall now. I doubt it will climb it, but if y'all can't accept that, then keep on trying to draw to that inside strait and keep holding those stocks.

US Dollar index today went sideways, up 3.8 basis points, but important thing is that it remained above 78.50. Currency traders weren't buying good news out of Europe. Euro gained 0.4% to 1.399, while the Yen closed up 0.19% at 128.54c/Y100 (Y77.8/$1).

Argentum et aurum comparenda sunt -- -- Gold and silver must be bought.

- Franklin Sanders, The Moneychanger
The-MoneyChanger.com

© 2011, The Moneychanger. May not be republished in any form, including electronically, without our express permission.

To avoid confusion, please remember that the comments above have a very short time horizon. Always invest with the primary trend. Gold's primary trend is up, targeting at least $3,130.00; silver's primary is up targeting 16:1 gold/silver ratio or $195.66; stocks' primary trend is down, targeting Dow under 2,900 and worth only one ounce of gold; US$ or US$-denominated assets, primary trend down; real estate bubble has burst, primary trend down.

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER. Be advised and warned:

Do NOT use these commentaries to trade futures contracts. I don't intend them for that or write them with that short term trading outlook. I write them for long-term investors in physical metals. Take them as entertainment, but not as a timing service for futures.

NOR do I recommend investing in gold or silver Exchange Trade Funds (ETFs). Those are NOT physical metal and I fear one day one or another may go up in smoke. Unless you can breathe smoke, stay away. Call me paranoid, but the surviving rabbit is wary of traps.

NOR do I recommend trading futures options or other leveraged paper gold and silver products. These are not for the inexperienced.

NOR do I recommend buying gold and silver on margin or with debt.

What DO I recommend? Physical gold and silver coins and bars in your own hands.

One final warning: NEVER insert a 747 Jumbo Jet up your nose.


Deflation Is Coming

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 11:10 AM PST

Jay Taylor believes the biggest challenge facing the U.S.—deflation—could mean a better year, or even decade, for junior gold stocks. Taylor, editor of Jay Taylor's Gold, Energy & Tech Stocks, has ridden some equities to the bottom of this punishing market and is ready to pile more cash into small gold companies. In this exclusive interview with The Gold Report, he explains why market sentiment hasn't shaken his faith.


Michael Pento: S&P Europe Credit Watch & Why Gold Will Skyrocket

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 10:57 AM PST

from King World News:

With news of Standard & Poor's putting 15 European nations on negative credit watch, today Michael Pento, of Pento Portfolio Strategies, to ask him what to expect next in Europe and how this will impact gold. When asked about the European news, Pento stated, "My first thought is there goes the leveraging up of the EFSF now that Germany and France may be added to that list of nations that need to have their ratings downgraded. Because if Germany and France are going to lose their credit rating, then how are they going to be able to fund and leverage up this European financial stability fund."

Michael Pento continues: Read More @ KingWorldNews.com


Another Min Raid on Gold and Silver / Conditions Deteriorate in Europe

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 10:55 AM PST

by Harvey Organ:

Good evening Ladies and Gentlemen:

Everybody is now waiting for the big EU summit where the boys will decide how they are going to save the Euro. I doubt if anything will be accomplished. On Friday we witnessed gold and silver rise. However the equity shares lost considerably on Friday, which is a sure sign of an attack which usually follows the day after. Their modus operandi does not change. The price of gold finished the comex session at $1730.70 down $16.30 on the day. The price of silver after being up for most of day followed in gold's footsteps down by 24 cents to $32.31. Let us head over to the comex and assess trading, inventory levels and deliveries.

Read More @ HarveyOrgan.Blogspot.com


Dow Theory Richard Russell: Gold, “Island of Safety”

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 10:09 AM PST

By Dominique de Kevelioc de Bailleul

Following the surprise announcement on Wednesday that six central banks have lowered dollar swaps rate by 50 basis points in an effort to allow European banks to bypass a rising LIBOR rate, Dow Theory Letter author Richard Russell told King World News investors should expect a jolt in commodities price in the future.

"The world's major central banks launched a joint action to provide chief emergency U.S. dollar loans to banks in Europe and elsewhere," Russell stated. "In a desperate effort to raise stocks, the central banks of the world coordinated by forcing more money into the world system."

The announcement incited a stampede into equities and commodities, as traders fell over each other to buy more of their favorite inflation play, resulting in pre-holiday gifts of a 400+ points rally in the Dow, $30 rise in the gold price and a nice spike of a dollar to the price of silver.

"This is exciting for now," added Russell, "but it will result in inflation within 6 months to a year."

Read more

Share


Pento - S&P Europe Credit Watch & Why Gold Will Skyrocket

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 10:08 AM PST

With news of Standard & Poor's putting 15 European nations on negative credit watch, today Michael Pento, of Pento Portfolio Strategies, to ask him what to expect next in Europe and how this will impact gold. When asked about the European news, Pento stated, "My first thought is there goes the leveraging up of the EFSF now that Germany and France may be added to that list of nations that need to have their ratings downgraded. Because if Germany and France are going to lose their credit rating, then how are they going to be able to fund and leverage up this European financial stability fund."


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

It’s Time to Think in Terms of Gold

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 10:01 AM PST

Author: Louis James Synopsis: Jeff Clark shows why gold is the only sane place to keep your savings, while Louis James highlights the perils of precious metals mining in politically risky countries like Peru. Dear Reader, ROCK & STOCK STATS Last One Month Ago One Year Ago Gold[RIGHT]1,747.00 1,743.00 1,389.00[/RIGHT] Silver[RIGHT]33.15 33.83 28.50[/RIGHT] Copper[RIGHT]3.52 3.58 3.98[/RIGHT] Oil[RIGHT]101.13 92.51 87.98[/RIGHT] Gold Producers (GDX)[RIGHT]58.07 59.96 61.18[/RIGHT] Gold Junior Stocks (GDXJ)[RIGHT]29.65 31.40 41.87[/RIGHT] Silver Stocks (SIL)[RIGHT]22.90 24.01 25.31[/RIGHT] TSX (Toronto Stock Exchange)[RIGHT]12,075.09 12,241.76 13,163.53[/RIGHT] TSX Venture[RIGHT]1,556.88 1,622.04 2,095.74[/RIGHT] Earlier this year, we advised readers of our metals publications to reduce their exposure to political risk in Peru, a country where mining is one of the mai...


Having trouble getting gold, buyers approach AngloGold Ashanti directly

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 09:58 AM PST

5:53p ET Monday, December 5, 2011

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

AngloGold Ashanti CEO Mark Cutifani tells Takoa Da Silva of the Bull Market Thinking Internet site that big buyers of gold are having trouble getting the volumes they want and so are approaching the mining company to try to get metal directly. Apparently bullion bank deposit receipts don't have the respect they once did. You can find the interview with Cutifani here:

http://bullmarketthinking.com/mark-cutifani-ceo-of-anglogold-ashanti-maj...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Sona Discovers Potential High-Grade Gold Mineralization
at Blackdome in British Columbia -- 13.6g over 1.5 Meters

From a Company Press Release
November 22, 2011

VANCOUVER, British Columbia -- With its latest surface diamond drilling program at its 100-percent-owned, formerly producing Blackdome gold mine in southern British Columbia, Sona Resources Corp. has discovered a potentially high-grade gold-mineralized area, with one hole intersecting 13.6 grams of gold in 1.5 meters of core drilling.

"We intersected a promising new mineralized zone, and we feel optimistic about the assay results," says Sona's president and CEO, John P. Thompson. "We have undertaken an aggressive exploration program that has tested a number of target zones. Our discovery of this new gold-bearing structure is significant, and it represents a positive development for the company."

Sona aims to bring its permitted Blackdome mill back into production over the next year and a half, at a rate of 200 tonnes per day, with feed from the formerly producing Blackdome mine and the nearby Elizabeth gold deposit property. A positive preliminary economic assessment by Micon International Ltd., based on a gold price of $950 per ounce over eight years, has estimated a cash cost of $208 per tonne milled, or $686 per gold ounce recovered.

For the company's complete press release, please visit:

http://www.sonaresources.com/_resources/news/SONA_NR18_2011-opt.pdf



Join GATA here:

Vancouver Resource Investment Conference
Sunday-Monday, January 22-23, 2012
Vancouver Convention Centre West
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

http://cambridgehouse.com/conference-details/vancouver-resource-investme...

California Investment Conference
Saturday-Sunday, February 11-12, 2012
Hyatt Grand Champions Resort
Indian Wells, California, USA

http://cambridgehouse.com/conference-details/california-investment-confe...

Support GATA by purchasing gold and silver commemorative coins:

https://www.amsterdamgold.eu/gata/index.asp?BiD=12

Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy Granted Landmark Chandgana Power Plant License

Company Press Release
Monday, November 21, 2011

VANCOUVER, British Columbia -- Prophecy Coal Corp. (TSX: PCY)(OTCQX: PRPCF)(Frankfurt: 1P2) announces that its wholly-owned Mongolian subsidiary, East Energy Development LLC, has received the license certificate from the Mongolian Energy Regulatory Authority to construct the 600-megawatt Chandgana power plant.

This 600-mw thermal power plant license is the first of its size issued by the Mongolian government. To ensure strict compliance with Mongolian laws and regulations in obtaining this license, Prophecy retained Mongolian and international consultants over the past 18 months and spent much effort on community relations.

Coal for the Chandgana mine-mouth power plant will be supplied from Prophecy's Chandgana Tal deposit, for which the company has already obtained a full mining license. Tal contains 141 million tonnes of measured coal and is located just 9 kilometers north of Prophecy's Chandgana Khavtgai project, a deposit with more than 1 billion tonnes of measured and indicated coal.

Chandgana is 60 km from Underkhann city (East Energy System) and 150 km from Baganuur city (Central Energy System). Construction of transmission lines linking the two cities through Chandgana is seen as a top priority for a much-improved and more efficient national Mongolian energy system.

John Lee, chairman and CEO of Prophecy Coal, says: "Prophecy has distinguished itself as the premier candidate to build the next Mongolian thermal power plant. There is an understanding among all stakeholders that Mongolia, being one of the world's fastest-growing economies, needs additional power. With the International Monetary Fund projecting a deficit for Mongolia of more than 600 mw by 2016, this need has become urgent and can no longer be delayed."

For Prophecy Coal's full press release, complete with maps, please visit:

http://www.prophecycoal.com/news_2011_nov21_prophecy_granted_landmark_ch...



Guest Post: It's Time To Give Up On Mainstream Economics

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 09:54 AM PST

Submitted by ChrisMartenson.com guest contributor Gregor Macdonald

It's Time To Give Up On Mainstream Economics

Few modern economists would, for example, monitor the behaviour of Procter and Gamble, assemble data on the market for steel, or observe the behaviour of traders.  The modern economist is the clinician with no patients, the engineer with no projects. ~ John Kay, from The Map is Not the Territory: An Essay on the State of Economics, October 2011

I'm not quite sure what a depression is. ~ Martin Feldstein, in an interview with Kelly Evans of the Wall Street Journal, October 2011

A Failure To See the Obvious 

Prior to 2008 it was generally understood that the profession hardly merited its claims of its own predictive utility. So the failure to assign enough risk to such a crisis as befell the developed world in 2008 was, frankly, no surprise. But in the aftermath of the crisis, economics, in its professional form, has revealed itself to be damagingly disconnected from observable reality.

A glaring example of this is how it cannot come to any agreement as to how the debt crisis occurred, and accordingly remains quite confused in its proffered solutions.

Mostly the profession remains curiously naive about the nature of debt, an understanding of which is more critical than ever as the developed world enters a 'slow' to 'no-growth' phase of its history. Indeed, many of the papers, interviews, and op-eds from central bankers and economists in the face of our present-day sovereign debt crisis are little more than an eerie restatement of the discussions which took place about private-sector debt from 2006-2008.

For a profession tasked with the analysis of dynamic systems, modern economics can be ploddingly linear. And for a profession supposedly guided by math, the descent into "sociology lite" is all too routine. One of the more consistent errors (or nervous tics, if you will) comes in the area of scale and proportion. A favorite and most astonishing example for me remains former Dallas Fed President Bob McTeer's explanation of the cause of the 2008 crisis. Writing in his blog at the end of 2009, McTeer set out to defend the US Federal Reserve for its role in the catastrophe:

It is taken as given these days that the Fed created the housing bubble. If this is true, then it must follow that the Fed is responsible for the bursting housing bubble, the ensuing financial crisis and subsequent recession. But, as I recall, the Fed did not create the housing bubble. It was the collateralized subprime loans, not a reversal of home prices, that caused the problems. Maybe there were too many loans, but, if so many had not been bad loans, air could have come out of the bubble without devastation...Subprime loans triggered the crisis and recession. Other things like too much debt and leverage made the problem worse, but didn't cause it.

Let's stipulate that the issue of causality can almost always broaden out into legitimate disagreement. But Mr. McTeer's claim here is so grossly disproportionate to the total size of the credit bubble, which was not limited to housing, that one is compelled to ask if Mr. McTeer actually understands the system over which the Federal Reserve presides. This blind spot towards debt growth, and in particular the rate of debt growth, counts as one of the more curious revelations to emerge from the crisis. Indeed, while the crisis finally produced a broader appreciation by the public of debt dynamics, it also produced a clearer portrait of the economic profession's intractable position towards debt. In short, they "don't see it."

And, here's what they don't see. The following chart is composed of total debt growth in the US economy from 1929 and helpfully covers the period through 2008, compared as percentage of GDP. As you can see, the rate of debt growth starting after 1999 should have been on the radar of economists and central banks. Especially the Fed. The 1985-1998 period was relatively slow by comparison. But starting in 1999, total US Credit Market Debt to GDP exploded higher, from 250% to 350%.

Let's rework the claim of McTeer, as follows: Subprime loans represented too small a portion of total credit to have either triggered or caused the crisis and recession. When growth slowed, the unsustainable amount of debt and leverage in the entire system was revealed, and thus made everything worse.

The cruel irony of McTeer's faulty understanding is that the US economy would be powering out of recession right now, with typical 4-6% GDP growth, had the credit bubble been confined (contained!) to subprime. The relegation of the crisis' beginnings or causes to subprime is now considered a kind of joke that flags a financially illiterate (or political) view. The US should have been so lucky as to have merely faced a subprime problem. Now there are 10.7 million US homes in negative equity. Twenty-five years of strong credit growth, a deflationary labor shock from the developing world, and a phase transition in energy prices set the stage, not for a post-war recession, but a depression. A meandering economic stagnation that can never produce a full recovery. 

Founded On a Fallacy 

Modern central banking came into existence, of course, during a secular growth phase in the developed world funded by cheap energy. Its task for most of the past 100 years has been to regulate growth -- not to manage decline. Much of the commentary you saw prior to 2008, such as Ben Bernanke's sincere lack of concern about a US housing bubble ("I guess I don't buy your premise. It's a pretty unlikely possibility. We've never had a decline in house prices on a nationwide basis...") is, of course, duplicated today as we confront a similar endgame in sovereign debt.

Economists in 2010, when the European crisis began, were sanguine. In the tête-à-tête between Hugh Hendry and Joseph Stiglitz last year, Stiglitz was adamant that debt service for Greece was no problem. More recently this summer, Jeffrey Sachs claimed at FT that there was a way out for Greece, by allowing the country to borrow at rates enjoyed by Germany. That may have seemed like the biggest catch to such a solution. I would submit, however, that the Sachs proposal contained a much larger uncertainty that is now the new blind spot common to the economics profession: the assumption of continued growth.

One of the more irritating personality traits of economics as a discipline is that it continually incorporates every trend into its growth model, and then identifies it as a good thing. The secular decline in US manufacturing jobs was deemed as such, as it "freed up" the populace to take service jobs. Interestingly, in our post-crisis economy, much of the selected regional strength in the US is now very much related to exports and a small resurgence in light manufacturing.

The Fed should have been paying closer attention to the multi-decade trend in US manufacturing employment. Instead, Alan Greenspan, a fan of Ayn Rand, believed the world operated in a magically offsetting series of harmonics, in which self-interest propagated though the financial system, producing a grand balance of risk. It is easy to understand how debt growth, cost inflation in health care and education, and the unsustainable bloat in the financial sector would flourish under such a paradigm. After all, "one person's debt is just another person's asset," so what could possibly go wrong?

Worsening What They Don't Understand

When central bankers can't initially understand why markets are rebelling against debt levels, they often turn to simplistic behavioral concepts. But a small dash of social psychology can be a dangerous thing when injected into monetary policy. Perhaps some moderate respect should be given now, many years after his tenure, to Alan Greenspan, who in testimony finally admitted that "the entire model he used to describe how the world worked, was wrong." In similar fashion, Ben Bernanke in his 2011 public testimony has admitted that the Fed "cannot print oil," cannot solve problems without help from fiscal policy, and probably cannot force a faster economic recovery.

But one wonders how evolved the Fed chairman really is, given his public statements in 2009 that the financial crisis was merely in the fashion of a 19th-century panic. Instead of exponential growth in private credit, capricious monetary policy from the Fed itself, or the guns-and-butter fiscal policies of the government, Bernanke voiced publicly in his PBS TV performance and also at Jackson Hole that we had merely suffered a Bagehot-type panic. This may have been why he thought, as did many others, that a normal recovery would ensue.

Here is the key passage from the Jackson Hole conference on August 21, 2009, Reflections on a Year of Crisis (Interpreting the Crisis: Elements of a Classic Panic):

How should we interpret the extraordinary events of the past year, particularly the sharp intensification of the financial crisis in September and October? Certainly, fundamentals played a critical role in triggering those events. As I noted earlier, the economy was already in recession, and it had weakened further over the summer. The continuing dramatic decline in house prices and rising rates of foreclosure raised serious concerns about the values of mortgage-related assets, and thus about large potential losses at financial institutions. More broadly, investors remained distrustful of virtually all forms of private credit, especially structured credit products and other complex or opaque instruments.

 

At the same time, however, the events of September and October also exhibited some features of a classic panic, of the type described by Bagehot and many others. A panic is a generalized run by providers of short-term funding to a set of financial institutions, possibly resulting in the failure of one or more of those institutions. The historically most familiar type of panic, which involves runs on banks by retail depositors, has been made largely obsolete by deposit insurance or guarantees and the associated government supervision of banks. But a panic is possible in any situation in which longer-term, illiquid assets are financed by short-term, liquid liabilities, and in which suppliers of short-term funding either lose confidence in the borrower or become worried that other short-term lenders may lose confidence. Although, in a certain sense, a panic may be collectively irrational, it may be entirely rational at the individual level, as each market participant has a strong incentive to be among the first to the exit.

The Fed Chairman is using a technique here called hiding in plain sight, or perhaps secrecy by complexity. It is inarguable that a behavioral panic took place. But the aim was clear: to avoid the debt saturation in OECD/developed nations and the United States and the years of slow-to-no growth it was fated to impose. More broadly, the Fed had been "managing" the growth of debt in the US economy for over two decades. 2008 was the signal that the long, secular era of lowering interest rates to help the economy manage its debt levels had reached its endpoint.

One possible explanation for this blind-spot towards debt is that the economics profession is largely in service to the political class. Books, such as Reinhardt and Rogoff's This Time is Different, which addresses the limits imposed by debt, are generally not in favor in the current era. Equally, the moral flavor to much of the right-leaning thinking on debt is also unsatisfying, as it also does not address debt-saturation so much as fiscal rectitude. What matters instead are the levels in both private-sector debt and public-sector debt that impose operational restraints. Total debt service as a proportion of income will always create a limit eventually among private sector borrowers. That is precisely what began to occur in the US and was the prima causa of the recession. However, the precise, problematic levels of debt for sovereign nations are trickier to identify.

The Tide Is Changing

Through a combination of confidence, debt service, actual economic flows, and the marketplace, however, 2012 is almost certainly the year that the present sovereign debt problems will be resolved, one way or another. Also, this week's US dollar swap operation likely points towards one of the two macroeconomic endgame pathways that I outlined last month.

The current economics profession in general, and our central banking leadership in particular, sheds even more credibility as it careens on, blinded by its own light. The process by which economic activity and resources are coaxed into being by stimulative monetary policy has reached its terminus, and the public will finally understand this dynamic over the next year.

In Part II: How The European Endgame Will Be The Death Knell For Modern Economics, we predict the coming endgame to the European fiscal and monetary crises. Doing so is becoming increasingly easier as we better understand the mindset of today's economic leaders and the shrinking number of options they have to address the issues before them. In fact, we think the shroud of awe and mystery that our grand economists have wrapped themselves in is fast-dissipating, and that the systemic pain their failures will inflict in 2012 -- initially most visible in Europe -- will finally cause the populace to look to a new school of economic thinking.    

Click here to access Part II of this report (free executive summary, enrollment required for full access). 


Guest Post: It's Time To Give Up On Mainstream Economics

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 09:54 AM PST


Submitted by ChrisMartenson.com guest contributor Gregor Macdonald

It's Time To Give Up On Mainstream Economics

Few modern economists would, for example, monitor the behaviour of Procter and Gamble, assemble data on the market for steel, or observe the behaviour of traders.  The modern economist is the clinician with no patients, the engineer with no projects. ~ John Kay, from The Map is Not the Territory: An Essay on the State of Economics, October 2011

I'm not quite sure what a depression is. ~ Martin Feldstein, in an interview with Kelly Evans of the Wall Street Journal, October 2011

A Failure To See the Obvious 

Prior to 2008 it was generally understood that the profession hardly merited its claims of its own predictive utility. So the failure to assign enough risk to such a crisis as befell the developed world in 2008 was, frankly, no surprise. But in the aftermath of the crisis, economics, in its professional form, has revealed itself to be damagingly disconnected from observable reality.

A glaring example of this is how it cannot come to any agreement as to how the debt crisis occurred, and accordingly remains quite confused in its proffered solutions.

Mostly the profession remains curiously naive about the nature of debt, an understanding of which is more critical than ever as the developed world enters a 'slow' to 'no-growth' phase of its history. Indeed, many of the papers, interviews, and op-eds from central bankers and economists in the face of our present-day sovereign debt crisis are little more than an eerie restatement of the discussions which took place about private-sector debt from 2006-2008.

For a profession tasked with the analysis of dynamic systems, modern economics can be ploddingly linear. And for a profession supposedly guided by math, the descent into "sociology lite" is all too routine. One of the more consistent errors (or nervous tics, if you will) comes in the area of scale and proportion. A favorite and most astonishing example for me remains former Dallas Fed President Bob McTeer's explanation of the cause of the 2008 crisis. Writing in his blog at the end of 2009, McTeer set out to defend the US Federal Reserve for its role in the catastrophe:

It is taken as given these days that the Fed created the housing bubble. If this is true, then it must follow that the Fed is responsible for the bursting housing bubble, the ensuing financial crisis and subsequent recession. But, as I recall, the Fed did not create the housing bubble. It was the collateralized subprime loans, not a reversal of home prices, that caused the problems. Maybe there were too many loans, but, if so many had not been bad loans, air could have come out of the bubble without devastation...Subprime loans triggered the crisis and recession. Other things like too much debt and leverage made the problem worse, but didn't cause it.

Let's stipulate that the issue of causality can almost always broaden out into legitimate disagreement. But Mr. McTeer's claim here is so grossly disproportionate to the total size of the credit bubble, which was not limited to housing, that one is compelled to ask if Mr. McTeer actually understands the system over which the Federal Reserve presides. This blind spot towards debt growth, and in particular the rate of debt growth, counts as one of the more curious revelations to emerge from the crisis. Indeed, while the crisis finally produced a broader appreciation by the public of debt dynamics, it also produced a clearer portrait of the economic profession's intractable position towards debt. In short, they "don't see it."

And, here's what they don't see. The following chart is composed of total debt growth in the US economy from 1929 and helpfully covers the period through 2008, compared as percentage of GDP. As you can see, the rate of debt growth starting after 1999 should have been on the radar of economists and central banks. Especially the Fed. The 1985-1998 period was relatively slow by comparison. But starting in 1999, total US Credit Market Debt to GDP exploded higher, from 250% to 350%.

Let's rework the claim of McTeer, as follows: Subprime loans represented too small a portion of total credit to have either triggered or caused the crisis and recession. When growth slowed, the unsustainable amount of debt and leverage in the entire system was revealed, and thus made everything worse.

The cruel irony of McTeer's faulty understanding is that the US economy would be powering out of recession right now, with typical 4-6% GDP growth, had the credit bubble been confined (contained!) to subprime. The relegation of the crisis' beginnings or causes to subprime is now considered a kind of joke that flags a financially illiterate (or political) view. The US should have been so lucky as to have merely faced a subprime problem. Now there are 10.7 million US homes in negative equity. Twenty-five years of strong credit growth, a deflationary labor shock from the developing world, and a phase transition in energy prices set the stage, not for a post-war recession, but a depression. A meandering economic stagnation that can never produce a full recovery. 

Founded On a Fallacy 

Modern central banking came into existence, of course, during a secular growth phase in the developed world funded by cheap energy. Its task for most of the past 100 years has been to regulate growth -- not to manage decline. Much of the commentary you saw prior to 2008, such as Ben Bernanke's sincere lack of concern about a US housing bubble ("I guess I don't buy your premise. It's a pretty unlikely possibility. We've never had a decline in house prices on a nationwide basis...") is, of course, duplicated today as we confront a similar endgame in sovereign debt.

Economists in 2010, when the European crisis began, were sanguine. In the tête-à-tête between Hugh Hendry and Joseph Stiglitz last year, Stiglitz was adamant that debt service for Greece was no problem. More recently this summer, Jeffrey Sachs claimed at FT that there was a way out for Greece, by allowing the country to borrow at rates enjoyed by Germany. That may have seemed like the biggest catch to such a solution. I would submit, however, that the Sachs proposal contained a much larger uncertainty that is now the new blind spot common to the economics profession: the assumption of continued growth.

One of the more irritating personality traits of economics as a discipline is that it continually incorporates every trend into its growth model, and then identifies it as a good thing. The secular decline in US manufacturing jobs was deemed as such, as it "freed up" the populace to take service jobs. Interestingly, in our post-crisis economy, much of the selected regional strength in the US is now very much related to exports and a small resurgence in light manufacturing.

The Fed should have been paying closer attention to the multi-decade trend in US manufacturing employment. Instead, Alan Greenspan, a fan of Ayn Rand, believed the world operated in a magically offsetting series of harmonics, in which self-interest propagated though the financial system, producing a grand balance of risk. It is easy to understand how debt growth, cost inflation in health care and education, and the unsustainable bloat in the financial sector would flourish under such a paradigm. After all, "one person's debt is just another person's asset," so what could possibly go wrong?

Worsening What They Don't Understand

When central bankers can't initially understand why markets are rebelling against debt levels, they often turn to simplistic behavioral concepts. But a small dash of social psychology can be a dangerous thing when injected into monetary policy. Perhaps some moderate respect should be given now, many years after his tenure, to Alan Greenspan, who in testimony finally admitted that "the entire model he used to describe how the world worked, was wrong." In similar fashion, Ben Bernanke in his 2011 public testimony has admitted that the Fed "cannot print oil," cannot solve problems without help from fiscal policy, and probably cannot force a faster economic recovery.

But one wonders how evolved the Fed chairman really is, given his public statements in 2009 that the financial crisis was merely in the fashion of a 19th-century panic. Instead of exponential growth in private credit, capricious monetary policy from the Fed itself, or the guns-and-butter fiscal policies of the government, Bernanke voiced publicly in his PBS TV performance and also at Jackson Hole that we had merely suffered a Bagehot-type panic. This may have been why he thought, as did many others, that a normal recovery would ensue.

Here is the key passage from the Jackson Hole conference on August 21, 2009, Reflections on a Year of Crisis (Interpreting the Crisis: Elements of a Classic Panic):

How should we interpret the extraordinary events of the past year, particularly the sharp intensification of the financial crisis in September and October? Certainly, fundamentals played a critical role in triggering those events. As I noted earlier, the economy was already in recession, and it had weakened further over the summer. The continuing dramatic decline in house prices and rising rates of foreclosure raised serious concerns about the values of mortgage-related assets, and thus about large potential losses at financial institutions. More broadly, investors remained distrustful of virtually all forms of private credit, especially structured credit products and other complex or opaque instruments.

 

At the same time, however, the events of September and October also exhibited some features of a classic panic, of the type described by Bagehot and many others. A panic is a generalized run by providers of short-term funding to a set of financial institutions, possibly resulting in the failure of one or more of those institutions. The historically most familiar type of panic, which involves runs on banks by retail depositors, has been made largely obsolete by deposit insurance or guarantees and the associated government supervision of banks. But a panic is possible in any situation in which longer-term, illiquid assets are financed by short-term, liquid liabilities, and in which suppliers of short-term funding either lose confidence in the borrower or become worried that other short-term lenders may lose confidence. Although, in a certain sense, a panic may be collectively irrational, it may be entirely rational at the individual level, as each market participant has a strong incentive to be among the first to the exit.

The Fed Chairman is using a technique here called hiding in plain sight, or perhaps secrecy by complexity. It is inarguable that a behavioral panic took place. But the aim was clear: to avoid the debt saturation in OECD/developed nations and the United States and the years of slow-to-no growth it was fated to impose. More broadly, the Fed had been "managing" the growth of debt in the US economy for over two decades. 2008 was the signal that the long, secular era of lowering interest rates to help the economy manage its debt levels had reached its endpoint.

One possible explanation for this blind-spot towards debt is that the economics profession is largely in service to the political class. Books, such as Reinhardt and Rogoff's This Time is Different, which addresses the limits imposed by debt, are generally not in favor in the current era. Equally, the moral flavor to much of the right-leaning thinking on debt is also unsatisfying, as it also does not address debt-saturation so much as fiscal rectitude. What matters instead are the levels in both private-sector debt and public-sector debt that impose operational restraints. Total debt service as a proportion of income will always create a limit eventually among private sector borrowers. That is precisely what began to occur in the US and was the prima causa of the recession. However, the precise, problematic levels of debt for sovereign nations are trickier to identify.

The Tide Is Changing

Through a combination of confidence, debt service, actual economic flows, and the marketplace, however, 2012 is almost certainly the year that the present sovereign debt problems will be resolved, one way or another. Also, this week's US dollar swap operation likely points towards one of the two macroeconomic endgame pathways that I outlined last month.

The current economics profession in general, and our central banking leadership in particular, sheds even more credibility as it careens on, blinded by its own light. The process by which economic activity and resources are coaxed into being by stimulative monetary policy has reached its terminus, and the public will finally understand this dynamic over the next year.

In Part II: How The European Endgame Will Be The Death Knell For Modern Economics, we predict the coming endgame to the European fiscal and monetary crises. Doing so is becoming increasingly easier as we better understand the mindset of today's economic leaders and the shrinking number of options they have to address the issues before them. In fact, we think the shroud of awe and mystery that our grand economists have wrapped themselves in is fast-dissipating, and that the systemic pain their failures will inflict in 2012 -- initially most visible in Europe -- will finally cause the populace to look to a new school of economic thinking.    

Click here to access Part II of this report (free executive summary, enrollment required for full access). 


European Bank Runs And Underestimated Physical Gold Demand

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 09:51 AM PST

global financial markets

Reading time: 6 – 10 minutes

The demand for gold is vastly underestimated. About 18 months ago I wrote about Euro Gold and the Euro Zone and Euro Evaporation Leading To Credit Default Swaps and IMF Gold. One key excerpt was:

The Euro is broken. This was its destiny. This is the destiny of all fiat currencies. These bureau-rats cannot stop this anymore than Cnut the Great could command the tide to halt.

And here we are.

THE GREAT CREDIT CONTRACTION

The Great Credit Contraction has been in relentless advance for years. This is a massively deflationary period as capital, both real and fictitious, burrows down the liquidity pyramid into safer and more liquid assets. The fictitious capital that does not move fast enough evaporates. Poof goes trillions of wealth!

In the Information Age bank runs happen with the click of a mouse and not lines outside the physical branches.
FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING

Fractional Reserve Banking is the banking practice in which banks keep only a fraction of their deposits in reserve (as cash and other highly liquid assets) and lend out the remainder while maintaining the simultaneous obligation to redeem all these deposits upon demand.

Fractional reserve banking occurs when banks lend out any fraction of the funds received from demand deposits. Despite being a form of embezzlement and fraud this practice is universal in modern banking.

This mismatch between time, borrowing short-term and lending long-term, is what creates the potential for a bank run. But an even larger looming problem lurks in 'cash and cash equivalents'. Yes, those pesky Tier I, II and III distinctions.

As a bank's assets evaporate their ability to make new loans, even extremely short-term loans like overnight, becomes impaired. When an entire banking system knows that all the major players have assets on their balance sheets, assets which are not accurately priced or accounted for, then there is an extreme reluctance to lend.

This is what happened when Lehman Brothers evaporated. The credit markets seized up. People acting in their own self-interest according to principles of praxeology moved into safe and liquid assets and refused to lend.

Liquidity dried up overnight. Mortgage backed securities, auction rate securities and plenty of other assets which had for decades been treated as 'cash equivalents' were suddenly shunned. The bid evaporated from a loss of confidence, the prices plunged, investors were snookered and bank balance sheets were massively damaged.

The gears of industry are seizing up.
EUROPE'S WORTHLESS BANK DEPOSITS

The European banks have balance sheets with trillions of Euros in value recorded but assets which every rational non-ignorant person knows are severely impaired. The credit markets are freezing, trust is evaporating and as a result liquidity is drying up.

Sure, the central banks of the world have joined in a massive illegal effort to lubricate the system but it will fail. Years ago when QE1 was announced I wrote The Federal Reserve Will Fail With Quantitative Easing. They are still failing just on a grander scale.

To recapitalize and lubricate the European banking and financial system would take at least €25 trillion and maybe upwards of €100 trillion. The failure is a mathematical certainty. The gears of industry are seizing up.

The Greek and Italian democracies were assassinated by banksters Lucas Papademos, Mario Monti and Mario Draghi who will attempt to prolong the failed banking and financial system by privatizing the gains and socializing the losses with inflationary tactics and bailouts in a vain attempt to prevent the credit liquidation. They will only succeed in prolonging and exacerbating the necessary correction.

What holders of capital should understand is that European bank balance sheets are caught in an unrecoverable credit contraction spin, the appropriate emergency maneuver is to Run To Gold and only a few will make it with their purchasing power intact.

The vast majority of assets will become charred wreckage as their purchasing power evaporates into worthlessness. Sure, there may be a few near miss recoveries between now and the ultimate failure but why take the risk?

LATENT GOLD DEMAND

There is massive latent gold demand as a 'cash or cash equivalent' asset. Why should a holder of capital store their wealth in bank deposits with counter-party risk when they can completely eliminate it by moving into unencumbered physical gold bullion?

Plus, by moving into physical gold bullion they eliminate the risk associated with fiat currency becoming worthless through the deflationary event called hyperinflation. Really, hyperinflation is just the next step in The Great Credit Contraction after capital has moved almost entirely down the liquidity pyramid.

The money managers allocating trillions of FRNs, Euros, Yen, etc. have not even begun moving into the monetary metals. In most cases it is only beginning to become acceptable to speak of them. Some fallaciously argue there is not enough gold to go around.

Sure, there is enough gold for it to be used as the world reserve currency but it is only a matter of price. A price that Jim Rickards argues the case for in Currency Wars of being between $8,000 and $54,000+ per ounce.

CONCLUSION

The European banking and financial system is imploding before our eyes in a massive credit contraction which is just the latest wave in The Great Credit Contraction. The European banks are in an unrecoverable deflationary spin. There is only one acceptable emergency recovery procedure and that is to Run To Gold.

Because so few have, therefore, the real gold demand is completely hidden and obscured from view. It will come when people lose confidence in the current banking and financial system by turning to and using alternatives that do not possess the same kinds of risks. In the Information Age bank runs happen with the click of a mouse and not lines outside the physical branches.

DISCLOSURES: Long physical gold, silver and platinum with no interest in DOW, S&P 500, the problematic SLV ETF, gold ETF or the platinum ETFs.


Copyright © 2008. This article was published on http://www.RunToGold.com by Trace Mayer, J.D. on December 5, 2011. This feed is for personal and non-commercial use only. Applicable legal information and disclosures are available. The use of this feed on other websites may breach copyright. If this content is not in your news reader then it may make the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. Please inform us at legal@runtogold.com so we can determine what action, if any, to take. If you are interested in how to buy gold or silver then you may consider GoldMoney.(Digital Fingerprint: 1122aabbLittleBrotherIsWatching3344ccdd)
Copyright © 2011 RunToGold.com. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator then the site you are looking at may be guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact legal@runtogold.com so we can take legal action immediately.
Plugin by Taragana



Biggest Week of the Year?

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 08:20 AM PST

Dave Gonigam – December 5, 2011

  • The most "important and volatile" week of the year? Pento, Amoss, Elmerraji help you get ready
  • A money-printing scheme even our editors couldn't conceive of: How to play the eurozone crisis when there's "no orderly exit"
  • Another reality check to last week's jobs report: A crucial indicator that's fallen six straight months
  • More than one reader sees Germany's Merkel achieving what Hitler only dreamed of… an inquiry about tax consequences for expatriating… wisdom from the world's worst central banker… and more!

This week "could be the most important and volatile seven days in all of 2011," says Michael Pento.

The eurodrama might be coming to a head… and the Federal Reserve will play a leading role, taking an ever-more active hand in keeping the Rube Goldberg contraption known as the eurozone from flying apart.

On Thursday says Mr. Pento, "The European Central Bank will most likely make a crucial decision as to whether or not they will monetize massive quantities of insolvent European debt without sterilizing those purchases" — that is, the pursuit of outright money printing.

"ECB head Mario Draghi has already lowered the interbank lending rate one-quarter point in his first few days in office."

"Now he is expected to take interest rates down to 1%. And in addition, if the European Summit meeting [on Friday] yields an acceptance to broad-based austerity measures, the ECB may finally assent to purchasing PIIGS' debt in unlimited quantities and duration."

Early signs are emerging this morning that this is what will take place. Thus, the Dow is up 150 as of this writing — within 100 points of its late-October high.

The reasons we see cited most frequently in the media are these…

  • Former Goldman Sachs adviser and current Italian prime minister Mario Monti proposed an "austerity" budget to cut the region's second-biggest debt. It features $40 billion in spending cuts and tax increases
  • In yet another "Merkozy" summit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicholas Sarkozy declared they want to rewrite the European Union treaty — including penalties for countries whose deficits are deemed too high.

Afterward, Sarkozy told reporters in Paris they hope to draw up a new document by… next March.

A more likely reason the market's up today might be this: The Fed is looking at shoveling money into broke European governments via the International Monetary Fund.

Reuters picked up a story from the German newspaper Die Welt. Not a lot of detail to it, but when you want to drop a rumor on a Sunday afternoon before the open in Asia, you don't need many: The idea is that the Fed and the 17 eurozone central banks would join forces to pump 100 billion euros into a special fund.

"I guess my wild imagination in anticipating the insane fiat bailouts is actually too conservative," quips our short strategist Dan Amoss in an email this morning.

In an alert to his readers on Friday, he wrote: "We may even see the Fed and the ECB lend to the IMF, which will re-lend cash to the PIIGS in the form of a 'debtor in possession' loan that will effectively allow European banks to keep pretending that they have no losses on PIIGS bonds.

"Draw up your own fiat-driven, rule-changing scenario, and there's a decent chance it will be tried."

"Once central banks start lending to insolvent banks, there can be no orderly exit," Dan goes on. "When sovereign defaults occur — and they will, in Greece and Portugal, and probably Italy and Spain — there will be an acceleration of money printing to keep the system propped up."

And Italy's austerity budget? Dead on arrival, Dan says. "The public in Greece and Italy will be furious when their 'technocratic' leaders from the banking establishment sign away their sovereignty to the EU and the IMF at this week's summit."

"There will be more riots and strikes, which will make the goals of budget austerity unachievable" — setting the stage for the aforementioned defaults in 2012.

How do you play this? Dan says it's time to implement a strategy similar to one he put to work in November 2008 — in the teeth of the global financial crisis. It delivered a 338% gain barely three months later. Intrigued? Much more at this link.

"Europe's debt debacle has been a recurring wrecking ball for U.S. stocks," says our resident technician Jonas Elmerraji, "and it's still far from resolved right now. Until it is, the market isn't going to be acting 'normally.'"

So what accounts for last week's monster move up? "Stocks were very oversold leading into this past week, creating a situation that was likely to bounce. At the same time, there are lots of investors sitting on the sidelines right now — that means that it takes less investor participation to move the market than it usually would."

Jonas' guidance for short-term traders: "I think that there is still a lot of reason to be skeptical of the market right now. That's all the more reason to approach stocks based on simple technical signals, and not on your gut."

After a few weeks of weak-but-not-awful U.S. economic numbers, some worrisome data are crossing the wires this morning…

  • Factory orders fell 0.4% in October, wiping out the previous month's gain, according to the Commerce Department. Most worrisome: Inventories are up big, 0.9%
  • The service sector slowed down in November. The ISM nonmanufacturing index clocked in at 52 — still in above-50 growth territory, but the slowest growth since January 2010. Most worrisome: The employment component of the index is now contracting, at 48.9

"Online help-wanted advertising has been tumbling for six consecutive months," writes John Williams at ShadowStats.com.

When newspapers still held sway, the Conference Board published an index of help wanted ads that Mr. Williams says "was one of the most reliable leading indicators of economic and employment activity."

A new index of online job ads has replaced it. "While the series still is nascent," he says, "it now has enough substance to be considered as a leading indicator of hiring activity."

And what does it indicate? A 1.9% drop between October and November, the sixth consecutive decline.

"Since May 2011, the series has declined by 13.7% and the current… pattern is suggestive of declining employment levels now, and in the near future, contrary to the gradual, but ever statistically insignificant gains reported in the monthly payroll employment surveys."

By the way, Williams' real-world unemployment rate — including people who long ago gave up looking for work — stands at 22.6%.

Gold is slipping as the week begins, the spot price down to $1,732. Silver has retreated to $32.40.

We figure we owe you some eurozone-related humor, and the world's worst central banker is obliging.

"With the continuous firming of the Chinese yuan, the U.S. dollar is fast ceasing to be the world's reserve currency and the eurozone debt crisis has made things even worse," declared Gideon Gono, governor of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe.

You might know him best as the man responsible for these…

…which earned him several essays like this one in The Daily Reckoning, republished in the second edition of Financial Reckoning Day.

Nearly three years after Zimbabwe's hyperinflation reached most ridiculous heights, Gono still has his job… but the nation's official currency is the U.S. dollar. An ironic means of getting inflation under control, but in this case it worked. Transactions are also allowed in pounds and euros.

To that list, Gono is looking to add the yuan. "As a country," he says, "we still have the opportunity to avoid being caught napping by adopting the Chinese yuan as part of consolidating the country's look East policy."

For whatever it's worth, Gono's announcement comes at the same time CME Group says it will accept yuan as collateral on its commodities exchanges. Hmmm…

"Two small typos in The 5 on Friday," a reader writes: "I believe you meant 'feigned' CPI, not 'chained' CPI. They changed the spelling to more accurately reflect what it really is."

"Also, in your story about Germany wanting a more centralized EU government, in which the Germans will sit uber alles, I believe you misspelled 'Merkel.' I'm pretty sure the correct Teutonic spelling of her name is H-I-T-L-E-R."

"What great-grandpa Adolf couldn't complete, she should be able to do with half the cost, in a quarter of the time, and with much less blood (excepting the Greeks, of course)."

"How soon will troubled euro nations compare Merkel to Hitler," writes another reader picking up the same theme, "by imposing strict discipline on their finances?"

"This is what happens when war breaks out and a nation takes over another: The defeated nation comes 'under new management.' This will be what Merkel will propose, except the other nations will be able to vote on it."

The 5: And if the vote doesn't go the eurocrats' way, they'll keep holding votes until they get the desired outcome.

"In Jersey City, N.J.," writes a reader tipping us off to still more new taxes and weird fees, if your water bill is past due, they send it to the municipal tax department and put a tax lien on your home.

"I never received the first bill for $150 and the tax department letter states that not being notified doesn't matter. As a side note, I am current on my mortgage, taxes and other obligations…hardly a deadbeat."

"I have a lot of retired friends that winter in the Southwest and go to Mexico for their dental work," writes a reader who caught our item about broke Americans skimping on dentistry.

"Most, if not all, of the dentists are schooled in the USA and some have offices in Mexico and the U.S. The cost of dental work in Mexico is so much cheaper."

"Instead of in two visits, they will do a crown in one visit and you are on your way with a cost of $200-400 per crown, instead of $1,200-1,600 with two one-hour visits in the U.S."

"The offices are very clean and the people are very professional. Side note: These offices are in the border towns of Mexico, so my friends park on the U.S. side of the border and walk to their appointments in Mexico."

"Thanks, and keep up your great work with the 5 Min. Forecast."

"A friend works for a outsourcing company," a reader writes, "and is responsible for overseeing the payroll processing. As such, he is usually in the know on changes to tax policy.

"In a recent conversation, he said that beginning in 2013, the U.S. government will begin withholding 30% of a person's assets for anyone moving outside of the country. He plans to retire in Panama, but was not planning on such an 'incentive' to execute the plan this year. Can you verify this info, and, if true, provide any additional insights that we need to know?"

The 5: Sounds as if something got lost in translation. Here's the deal: Effective January 2014, if you hold $50,000 in "foreign financial assets," you must bank at an institution that forks over your information to the IRS or face 30% withholding on the income and gross proceeds from any U.S. assets in your account. That applies no matter where you live.

Meanwhile in 2008, President Bush signed a bill requiring Americans who surrender their U.S. citizenship to fork over capital gains taxes on the appreciated value of everything they own, as if they sold it.

We run down a host of issues related to moving your money overseas — complete with suggested solutions — in a special report that's free for every new reader of Apogee Advisory. Access here.

Cheers,

Dave Gonigam
The 5 Min. Forecast

P.S. "For binary traders," Abe Cofnas wrote his readers this morning, "the European debt crisis is a gift that keeps on giving.

"Things could change in an instant… which is why I'm recommending three breakthrough trades that will pay off if markets move in any direction, as well as a 'greed' trade."

Last week was a textbook case of applying Abe's strategy — two winners among three plays, delivering gains of 38% and 39%. The market doesn't need to go up to make money using Abe's strategy. Nor does it need to go down. It just needs to move… and everything plays out in four days or less.

Abe's strategy is ideal at a time like this, when stocks are going nowhere but the Dow routinely posts big swings of hundreds of points. Here's how to make the most of the volatility.

P.P.S. "We've had two successive presidential administrations who've tried to finagle the macro economy in a way that prevents any failure, and look where it's gotten us," declared Laissez Faire Books executive editor Jeffrey Tucker on Fox Business' Freedom Watch Friday.

The wide-ranging interview covers everything from the bankruptcy of American Airlines to the phenomenon of highly indebted college students living it up in McMansions. Seriously. Check it out.


It's Long past Time For Europe To Give American Banks The Finger

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 08:19 AM PST

1:30PM est

EUR Tumbles: S&P About To Put Europe's AAA Club (Including Germany, France And Austria) On "Creditwatch Negative"
From ZeroHedge

Here it comes. From the FT: "Standard and Poor's has warned Germany and the five other triple A members of the eurozone that they risk having their top-notch ratings downgraded as a result of deepening economic and political turmoil in the single currency bloc. The US ratings agency is poised to announce later on Monday that it is putting Germany, France, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, and Luxembourg on "creditwatch negative", meaning there is a one-in-two chance of a downgrade within 90 days. It warned all six governments that their ratings could be lowered to AA+ if the creditwatch review failed to convince its experts. Markets have been braced for a potential downgrade of France but few expected Germany's top rating to be called into question. With regard to Germany, S&P said it was worried about "the potential impact (...) of what we view as deepening political, financial, and monetary problems with the European economic and monetary union." Standard and Poor's has warned Germany and the five other triple A members of the eurozone that they risk having their top-notch ratings downgraded as a result of deepening economic and political turmoil in the single currency bloc." How this critical news was leaked, we have no idea. However, what is important is that now may be a good time to panic, unless Allianz has another CDO Quadratic plan up its sleeve...


The result: the EURUSD promptly forgets the bullshit it was being fed all morning by the Eurocrats.

The S&P, the bogus credit ratings entity that assured millions of global investors that American mortgage backed securities were AAA rated when they were actually junk, has come forth with the revelatory release that the countries of Europe may "Not" be worthy of a AAA rating.  This is F***ing brilliant!  Ray Charles could have seen these European counties had some debt issues...MONTHS AGO!

But here we are in the critical throws of survival for the Euro, and this US bank pandering credit agency comes out with a statement that they might have to lower the credit ratings of the entire Eurozone.

This is PATHETIC!  What purpose does this serve but to help thier US banking masters that are short European banks and holding BILLIONS of Dollars in fraudulent Credit Default swaps on the sovereign nations of Europe.  If the Eurozone must be threatened with a downgrade, so should the class clown of global debt...the USA.

Of course this "leaked" statement causes a freefall in the Euro and Commodity prices as the ass-wipe paper we know as the US Dollar is stupidly bid up by those intoxicated by the idea that the US Dollar is a "safe-haven"...and will somehow benefit from the collapse of the Euro.

Folks, if the Euro goes under ALL of the fiat currencies will follow it down the drain.

Of course, you should absolutely sell all your Gold and Silver as it is of no value whatsoever in a global currency crisis as the global bedrock of sovereign debt collapses around it. NOT!

Does Nobody get it?

If the world's fiat currencies are based on debt, and the debt collapses, there is no more fiat currency.  Gold and Silver owe nobody anything.  They are the purest form of bedrock solid currency the world has ever known.  BUY BUY BUY the Precious Metals!  These prices are gifts from Santa's Elves.

4:30PM est

S & P has now made their credit review of the Eurozone official, and it would seem that the timing of their announcement is aimed at pressuring the Euro nations leaders at their summit later this week.  By what right does this pandering US credit agency have the "authority" to interject itself, and it's dubious at best credit ratings into the Eurozone sovereign debt negotiations?

Here Comes The S&P Downgrade Barrage - Full Statement, In Which S&P Says France May Get Two Notch Downgrade
From ZeroHedge

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services today placed its long-term sovereign ratings on 15 members of the European  Economic and Monetary Union (EMU or eurozone) on CreditWatch with negative implications. 


We have also maintained the CreditWatch negative status of our long-term  rating on Cyprus and placed its short-term ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications. The ratings on Greece have not been placed on  CreditWatch. The ratings on the eurozone sovereigns are listed below.
Today's CreditWatch placements are prompted by our belief that systemic stresses in the eurozone have risen in recent weeks to the extent that they now put downward pressure on the credit standing of the eurozone as a whole.
We believe that these systemic stresses stem from five interrelated factors:
  1. Tightening credit conditions across the eurozone;
  2. Markedly higher risk premiums on a growing number of eurozone sovereigns, including some that are currently rated 'AAA';
  3. Continuing disagreements among European policy makers on how to tackle the immediate market confidence crisis and, longer term, how to ensure greater
  4. economic, financial, and fiscal convergence among eurozone members;(4) High levels of government and household indebtedness across a large area of the eurozone; and
  5. The rising risk of economic recession in the eurozone as a whole in 2012. Currently, we expect output to decline next year in countries such as Spain, Portugal and Greece, but we now assign a 40% probability of a fall in output for the eurozone as a whole.
Our CreditWatch review of eurozone sovereign ratings will focus on three of the five key factors that form the core of our sovereign ratings methodology:
the "political," "external," and "monetary" scores we assign to the governments in the eurozone (see "Sovereign Government Rating Methodology And Assumptions", published June 30, 2011). Our analysis of "political dynamics" will focus on both country-specific and eurozone-wide issues that appear to us to be limiting the effectiveness of efforts to resolve the market confidence crisis. Our analysis of "external liquidity" will focus on the borrowing requirements of both eurozone governments and banks. Our analysis of "monetary flexibility" will focus on ECB policy settings to address the economic and financial stresses the countries in the eurozone are increasingly facing.  


We expect to conclude our review of eurozone sovereign ratings as soon as possible following the EU summit scheduled for Dec. 8 and 9, 2011. Depending on the score changes, if any, that our rating committees agree are appropriate for each sovereign, we believe that ratings could be lowered by up to one  notch for Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, and Luxembourg, and by up to two notches for the other governments.  [THIS MEANS FRANCE]


Our ratings on Greece (Hellenic Republic; CC/Negative/C) are not affected by today's actions, as a 'CC' rating under our rating definitions connotes our belief that there is a relatively high near-term probability of default.


We are publishing separate media releases with the rationale for each rating action on the 16 CreditWatch actions. We are also publishing the following article: "Credit FAQ: Factors Behind Our Placement of Eurozone Governments on CreditWatch".


Following today's CreditWatch listings, Standard & Poor's will issue separate media releases concerning affected ratings on the funds, government-related entities, financial institutions, insurance companies, public finance, and structured finance sectors in due course.


Truly pathetic, and all the proof you need that the big US banks are behind the debt crisis in the Eurozone.  The S&P is a pawn of the US banks, everybody either knows or believes that..  There was absolutely no reason for this announcement to occur on the eve of a crucial Eurozone summit...unless of course your aim was to aid in the profit said announcement would afford those aligned against the nations the announcement affected.

Lets get it straight folks...everything that occurs in the global financial structure is all about the US banks.  By prodding S&P to make this debt downgrade statement of the Eurozone sovereign debt, the US banks hope to give themselves a leg up on the outcome of this weeks Euro summit.  The best thing the Europeans could do for the whole world is simply walk away from their debt the way Iceland did.  Screw the American banks.  It is long past time these treasonous entities were destroyed.


IT'S YOUR CHOICE, EUROPE: Rebel Against the Banks OR Accept Debt-Serfdom
By Charles Hugh Smith

The European debt Bubble has burst, and the repricing of risk and debt cannot be put back in the bottle.

It's really this simple, Europe: either rebel against the banks or accept decades of debt-serfdom. All the millions of words published about the European debt crisis can be distilled down a handful of simple dynamics. Once we understand those, then the choice between resistance and debt-serfdom is revealed as the only choice: the rest of the "options" are illusory.

1. The euro enabled a short-lived but extremely attractive fantasy: the more productive northern EU economies could mint profits in two ways: A) sell their goods and services to their less productive southern neighbors in quantity because these neighbors were now able to borrow vast sums of money at low (i.e. near-"German") rates of interest, and B) loan these consumer nations these vast sums of money with stupendous leverage, i.e. 1 euro in capital supports 26 euros of lending/debt.
The less productive nations also had a very attractive fantasy: that their present level of productivity (that is, the output of goods and services created by their economies) could be leveraged up via low-interest debt to support a much higher level of consumption and malinvestment in things like villas and luxury autos.

Northern Europe has fueled its growth through exports. It has run huge trade imbalances, the most extreme of which with these same Southern European countries now in peril. Productivity rose dramatically compared to the South, but the currency did not.
This explains at least part of the German export and manufacturing miracle of the last 12 years. In 1999, exports were 29% of German gross domestic product. By 2008, they were 47%—an increase vastly larger than in Italy, Spain and Greece, where the ratios increased modestly or even fell. Germany's net export contribution to GDP (exports minus imports as a share of the economy) rose by nearly a factor of eight. Unlike almost every other high-income country, where manufacturing's share of the economy fell significantly, in Germany it actually rose as the price of German goods grew more and more attractive compared to those of other countries. In a key sense, Germany's currency has been to Southern Europe what China's has been to the U.S.

Flush with profits from exports and loans, Germany and its mercantilist (exporting nations) also ramped up their own borrowing--why not, when growth was so strong?

But the whole set-up was a doomed financial fantasy. The euro seemed to be magic: it enabled importing nations to buy more and borrow more, while also enabling exporting nations to reap immense profits from rising exports and lending.

Put another way: risk and debt were both massively mispriced by the illusion that the endless growth of debt-based consumption could continue forever. The euro was in a sense a scam that served the interests of everyone involved: with risk considered near-zero, interest rates were near-zero, too, and more debt could be leveraged from a small base of productivity and capital.

But now reality has repriced risk and debt, and the clueless leadership of the EU is attempting to put the genie back in the bottle. Alas, the debt loads are too crushing, and the productivity too weak, to support the fantasy of zero risk and low rates of return.

The Credit Bubble Bulletin's Doug Nolan summarized the reality succinctly: "The European debt Bubble has burst." Nolan explains the basic mechanisms thusly: The Mythical "Great Moderation":

For years, European debt was being mispriced in the (over-liquefied, over-leveraged and over-speculated global) marketplace. Countries such as Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy benefitted immeasurably from the market perception that European monetary integration ensured debt, economic and policy making stability.
Similar to the U.S. mortgage/Wall Street finance Bubble, the marketplace was for years content to ignore Credit excesses and festering system fragilities, choosing instead to price debt obligations based on the expectation for zero defaults, abundant liquidity, readily available hedging instruments, and a policymaking regime that would ensure market stability.
Importantly, this backdrop created the perfect market environment for financial leveraging and rampant speculation in a global financial backdrop unsurpassed for its capacity for excess. The arbitrage of European bond yields was likely one of history's most lucrative speculative endeavors. (link via U. Doran)

In simple terms, this is the stark reality: now that debt and risk have been repriced, Europe's debts are completely, totally unpayable. There is no way to keep adding to the Matterhorn of debt at the old cheap rate of interest, and there is no way to roll over the trillions of euros in debt that are coming due at the old near-zero rates.
Never mind actually paying down debt, sovereign, corporate and private--the repricing of risk and debt mean even the interest payments are unpayable. Consider this chart of one tiny slice of total EU debt:

Europe

There is no way to push the repricing genie back in the bottle, and so there is no way to roll over this debt and add to it--and to support the high-cost structure of Euroland's welfare-state governments and their astounding debt, then debt must be added, and in staggering quantities.

Austerity won't put the repricing/bubble burst genie back in the bottle. A funny thing happens when more of the national income is diverted to debt service (making interest payments and rolling over existing debt into new higher-interest debt): there is less surplus available for investment and consumption, which means that both productivity based on investment and consumption based on debt will plummet.

This leaves the nation with lower productivity and lower GDP, which means there is also less tax revenues being collected and more bankruptcies as companies and individuals accept the reality that their debts cannot be paid.

The repricing genie responds to this decline in national income, surplus and taxes by repricing risk of default even higher, and so the interest rate is also repriced higher. This makes servicing the mountain of existing debt even more costly, and so even less national income is available for consumption, investment and taxes.

This is called a positive feedback loop: each action reinforces the other, i.e. a self-reinforcing feedback loop. Debt and risk are repriced higher, t


Gold Daily and Silver Weekly Charts - Light Volumes and Frivilous Day Trader Markets

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 08:15 AM PST


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Commodities And Rates Lead Derisking Afternoon

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 08:08 AM PST


High yield credit spreads were the first to show signs of disappointment this morning but this seemed more due to technical relationships in the CDS index market as HYG stormed ahead with stocks. Commodities had notably cracked early on this morning and were trending lower already as we broke the FT rumor of broad S&P downgrades in euro sovereigns. All markets reacted instantly, no questions asked, and while IG, HY, and the S&P dropped together, it was the drops in commodities as the USD strengthened that were optically of the highest magnitude. TSYs also instantly reacted and were another major outperformer - drastically beating Bunds on the day. ES (the e-mini S&P 500 futures contract) was much less volatile than broad risk assets overnight but as Europe opened markets started to move closely together in a positive risk mode. CONTEXT (the broad risk basket) was less positive that ES in the US morning session but as we sold off and closed they were closely in sync once again as every member of the basket was contributing to risk aversion. Financials outperformed but were well off their intraday highs as a sector with the majors closing mixed (e.g. BAC near lows and MS near highs) but we note that financials were the most net sold (especially the majors) in corporate bond land.

Some late day covering lifted 30Y TSY yields and EUR strengthened against the USD (European banks repatriating ahead of their open?) helping CONTEXT and elevating ES into the close. ES was on its own relative to credit though as it tore back up to try and regain VWAP.

ES and broad risk assets (CONTEXT) generally stayed in sync and the late day surge in ES was accompanied most clearly by 30Y weakness and EUR strength (did Europeans get a late night call?).

It was certainly notable that 30Y stood out in the sell-off relative to the rest of the curve in that last few minutes. In corporate bonds, HY bonds were net bought (which means buy-side clients bought more FROM dealers than they sold TO dealers) and IG bonds net sold. This HY buying perhaps fits with the HYG moves also (as dealer inventory deleveraging is increasingly dwarfed by ETF and mutual fund flows). Most notably, Financials (which were the clear winners in stocks) saw major net selling in bonds - dominated by the majors - and this was not TLGP paper - this was further out the curve.

Credit (IG and HY) did not participate in the last minute surge up in ES as it tried to get back to 1258 (VWAP).It almost exactly hit it (see chart below - solid red line) and then retraced back down right as we closed.

Once again HYG outperformed both stocks and HY spreads and HY spread weakness (due potentially to index arbitrage) was not enough to explain the weakness and we grow increasingly concerned at HYG's richness to NAV and momentum-like characteristics as what looks like retail chases it up here.

If we didn't know better we would expect a margin hike in Silver tonight but it was clear that commodities were not bid even before the S&P rumor/news. Silver is now down almost 2% from Friday's close as Oil stays much closer to the USD moves.

Chart: Bloomberg and Capital Context


MF Global And The Truth About Our Entire System

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 08:01 AM PST

MF Global would not have been able to do what they did without Corzine's close relationship with CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler (see this:  LINK) - Dave in Denver
My thoughts for this blog just sort of flowed from a back and forth exchange I had earlier with long-time market colleague and GATA Chairman Bill Murphy, aka "Midas" of http://www.lemetropolecafe.com/  We had been discussing why the metals sold off today despite the fact that it's becoming more obvious by the day that both the Fed and the ECB will have to print a lot more money OR be willing to accept the consequences of system collapse.

With regard to the market in gold and silver, I said that when I woke up and saw gold down with no real news I assumed it was what Jesse says it is ("Jesse" of http://www.jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/):  It's become crystal clear that the Government has absolutely no intention whatsoever to stop the illegal manipulation of the metals market. The best thing to do is keep accumulating physical on these dips and be careful with margin.

Bill pointed out that the action in the shares on Friday - unexplainably lower - forecast today's action in the metals, as the big bank manipulators - left unregulated by the regulators - usually hit the mining shares before they try to raid the metals.  I agreed with that for the most part except that the hit on silver didn't work on Friday. It's true the hit on the shares forecast this but the reason for it is to try and reduce the amount of actual Comex gold and silver deliveries they have to make, especially if the receivers (stoppers) ask for the metal to be delivered off the Comex. I think there's a real inventory stress building on the Comex. I think the advent and growth of SLV and GLD alleviated this for a few years but now more investors are understanding the difference between ETFs and real metal and the risks of leaving your metal with a questionable custodian. Just the movement of the reported inventory of metal at the Comex over the past couple of weeks tells us something unusual is going on.

And don't underestimate the stress that the Venezuela move has put on the physical market  (Venezuela President Hugo Chavez has recalled 200 tonnes of gold being stored in England, Switzerland and New York and had it shipped back to Venezuela out of justified distrust of the custodians in those countries). Chavez is no dummy. He didn't do that to try and squeeze the market, he did that because he wants to make sure Venezuela has its gold and there's no risk of an MF-type event at the big bullion custodians like HSBC and JP Morgan. Which brings me to one more point, even though the MF thing will probably minimized by the media and the perps will walk relatively unpunished, there is no doubt in my mind that it's "raising the eyebrows" of smart, wealthy investors all over the world. This will be a problem for the fractional bullion custodians if I'm right.

Furthermore, for what it's worth, my partner and I think most of the risk of big hits on the metals has been washed out. We think we will see a significant move to the upside over the next 3-6 months and have started positioning our portfolio accordingly. There's no doubt in my mind they are working like hell to contain the risk of a possible run on Comex metal. Again, we should not be underestimating the trust/confidence factor that has been introduced by the MF situation. You would have to be absolutely brain-dead to believe that this can't happen at one of the big Too-Big-To-Fail banks.
Regarding my above-statement about MF, hilariously the CTFC today passed "tougher" regulations with regard to commodity and futures brokers abilities to use customer funds.  Interestingly:  
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which voted unanimously to approve the rule, originally planned to finalize it months ago. But the agency delayed the overhaul amid fierce push-back from Jon S. Corzine, who at the time was the chief executive of MF Global.   LINK
It's been my contention all along that MF Global would unequivocally have NOT been able to embezzle customer funds the way they did if it were not for the tight relationship between Jon Corzine and CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler.  In fact, I strongly believe that Gensler should be forced to resign his position and AG Eric Holder should open an investigation into his link to Corzine.  Anything short of this and you can be assured that the integrity of our system is rapidly collapsing.

The truth of the matter is that as people who are paying attention start to really lose faith in the system - the banking and brokerage industry, traditional wealth safekeeping custodians and the entities in who make money insuring their integrity (clearing agents like the CME), and the Government regulators who are supposed to be enforcing the rules already in place but are more likely in bed with the corrupt operators like Corzine - we will see a massive sweeping of money from of all paper wealth depositories that will be channelled into in the world's oldest currency and the only one that does not have any counter-party risk - gold and silver. 

For those who are wondering how the dollar has "counterparty risk," understand that the dollar is backed by the "full faith and credit of the U.S. Government."  The Government is therefore the counterparty obligated to maintaining the value of the U.S. dollar and guaranteeing its use as a currency.  Given that the dollar has lost 96% of its value since the 1913 establishment of the Fed, I would say that the risk of the U.S. Government as a counterparty to the dollar is substantial.  Eventually the dollar will completely collapse, as have ALL "fiat" currencies in the entire history of human  existence.  In the meantime, those who are in a position to do so are stealing as much wealth from the people in this country as they can - and they are often enjoined in this venture by those in charge of preventing the theft.  Corzine/Gensler is the perfect example and proof that I am right about this.  Got gold?



Deflation Is Coming: Jay Taylor

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 07:55 AM PST

The Gold Report: In the Nov. 4 edition of Hotline, you note that America's ratio of debt to gross domestic product (GDP) is north of 350%. Our total debt as a society is somewhere around $57 trillion (T). That's worse than Greece. Is deflation America's biggest economic threat? Jay Taylor: I believe it is, however, most of my goldbug friends wouldn't agree. It is important to realize that the U.S. is not a third-world country. It still has the world's reserve currency. The central bank, the Federal Reserve, doesn't put money into the hands of the masses. It puts money in banks. It's all about credit extension. That is very difficult to do now. With the debt-to-GDP ratio as it is, it's unsustainable. The markets are telling us that—not only in the U.S., but clearly in Europe as well. We are undergoing one of the largest debt-deleveraging periods in a long time, which may be much larger than what we went through in the 1930s. TGR: You believe there should be no more bailouts, let this ...


No comments:

Post a Comment