A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Gold World News Flash

Gold World News Flash


International Forecaster October 2011 (#5) - Gold, Silver, Economy + More

Posted: 16 Oct 2011 05:32 AM PDT

The big question is will Greece succumb to insolvency in November? Our answer is probably not. It should take 3 to 6 months but it is coming no matter how much money and credit is thrown at the problem. The markets on the short-term basis believe it is a coin toss. If the funds are not forthcoming you could see a 60-80 percent haircut on bond losses. If it is 3 to 6 months it will probably be 100%. Many in Europe believe the Merkel-Sarkozy team has a plan that will work, but as yet we do not know what that plan is. In spite of that the euro this past week rallied from $1.32 to $1.38 as the US dollar fell lower.


Transcript of Chris Waltzek’s Interview With Peter Grandich

Posted: 16 Oct 2011 05:19 AM PDT

Today's featured guest has been a market commentator for 30 years. Peter Grandich correctly forecasted not only the '87 market crash, but also the dot.com bust. Peter Grandich is a strong supporter of the gold and silver market and is editor of The Grandich Newsletter. Welcome, Peter.


Silver Dollar Values Prices Will Be Skyrocketing, Now Should I Invest in Silver Instead Of Gold?

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 02:07 PM PDT

from PRLog.org:

My own curiosity in gold goes back to the 1970′s when I bought my first gold coins. Over the many years I have had the opportunity to assess the efficiency of gold and silver side by side. I watched gold climb from about $100/oz to $850/oz from 1973 to 1980. That is an 850% increase. I watched silver in the precise exact same time frame climb from about $4.50/oz to $50/oz. That is more than a 1000% increase. So even in the decade of the 70s silver was outperforming gold. Go to http://silver-dollar-values.com for more lucrative silver and gold tips.

It is broadly thought that many intrigued parties every right here and overseas manipulate the metals markets. That indicates they fluctuate broadly. Silver tends to fluctuate collectively with gold nevertheless the swings in each directions are higher. In the finish of the twenty year bear marketplace in precious metals which ended in about 2000 gold had fallen from $850/oz to a reduced of about $252/oz but silver had fallen all of the way back once more from $50/oz to its level in the beginning of the 1970s at just a little below $5/oz so its percentage drop was higher than that of gold.

Read More @ PRLog.org


Greg Weldon: ECB Forced to Print, Gold’s Lowest Target $3,000

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 01:24 PM PDT

from King World News:

With gold and silver finishing the week higher, King World News interviewed Greg Weldon, Head of Weldon Financial. Weldon has a global following of some of the wealthiest investors in the world including individuals, institutions and financial firms. When asked about his take on the ongoing crisis, Weldon stated, "The contagion is still raging and it's too soon to celebrate. This is the problem I have with thinking any of these solutions they are going to come up with are really solutions at all because 25 of the 27 nations (in Europe) are in violation of the rules on debt and deficits. So how are these nations going to bail each other out? They are all in the same boat."

Greg Weldon continues: Read More @ KingWorldNews.com


Finews Interviews James Turk

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 01:21 PM PDT

from GoldMoney.com:

James Turk James, after gold has fallen 15 per cent in three days, many people say, gold as lost its safe haven status. True?

No, it is not true. First of all, the price of just about every other asset also fell, so gold was no different in this regard. More importantly, gold is a tangible asset, so it does not have any counterparty risk. It is this attribute that makes gold the best safe haven.

What makes gold so volatile lately?

It is not only gold that is volatile. For example, the VIX Index, which is a measure of volatility of US stock markets, tripled over the past couple of months. Everything is volatile because the financial system is breaking apart. To explain this point, picture in your mind a spinning top. As it slows down, there are often some huge wobbles before it rights itself, and then eventually falls over. The volatility we are seeing now is those wobbles. I expect another bank collapse like Lehman before the end of the year. That is when the top will fall over.

Read More @ GoldMoney.com


The Economic Crisis in Europe; Unpayable Debts. Impending Financial Insolvency

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 01:18 PM PDT

by Bob Chapman, GlobalResearch.ca:

The big question is will Greece succumb to insolvency in November? Our answer is probably not. It should take 3 to 6 months but it is coming no matter how much money and credit is thrown at the problem. The markets on the short-term basis believe it is a coin toss. If the funds are not forthcoming you could see a 60-80 percent haircut on bond losses. If it is 3 to 6 months it will probably be 100%. Many in Europe believe the Merkel-Sarkozy team has a plan that will work, but as yet we do not know what that plan is. In spite of that the euro this past week rallied from $1.32 to $1.38 as the US dollar fell lower.

Greece has been laboring under austerity imposed by the EU, IMF and the ECB and as a result their deficit for the first half of the year rose to $21.4 billion from $17.3 billion. Needless to say, tax revenues have fallen off a cliff and as a result the Troika has mandated further cuts in order to offset revenue loss. This is a never ending story, because when all is said and done the economy will be all but dismantled, that is what economy existed in the first place. As a result unemployment worsens and that provides more demonstrators in the streets. Those lower tax receipts mean more government layoffs. As a result of these and other problems Greek projections came up about 25% short of projections. These nebulous announcements by key players certainly did not justify major rallies in stock markets. Economic numbers in Greece are dreadful and in the UK, US and Europe they are only marginally better. It is obvious the world is slowing down.

Read More @ GlobalResearch.ca


Don't Forget About the Dollar

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 12:50 PM PDT

The strength of a month ago has given way to weakness over the past two weeks. But the price structure is still bullish, as price has only pulled back to test support levels at 76.65. This would represent a very good low risk entry ... Read More...



Saudi central bank says it's not interested in distressed assets or gold

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 11:59 AM PDT

Would they really announce any buying in advance and thereby drive up the price they'd have to pay? Or would they deny interest until they got their metal? See:

http://www.gata.org/node/9094

* * *

By Martin Dokoupil
Reuters
Saturday, October 15, 2011

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/15/us-saudi-cbanker-idUSTRE79E291...

PARIS -- Saudi Arabia's central bank is not interested in buying distressed or speculative assets such as troubled European debt and gold and the OPEC member's banks are well positioned to withstand the euro zone crisis, its head said on Saturday.

The world's No. 1 oil exporter like most of its Gulf Arab neighbors is a major holder of dollar assets as its riyal currency is pegged to the greenback and crude accounts for 85 percent of its budget revenue.

Asked if the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency had considered buying European sovereign bonds such as Italian ones, Governor Muhammad al-Jasser told Reuters: "We do not buy specific bonds at all. We have not done it."

"We always have a much more integrated reserve investment strategy which looks at it in a continuous and dynamic way that values security, safety and liquidity and therefore we do not look opportunistically at distressed assets or special assets that come up one way or the other," Jasser said after a meeting of the Group of 20 countries in Paris.

... Dispatch continues below ...



ADVERTISEMENT

For Continuous Wealth Creation, the Hera Research Newsletter

The life cycles of companies that produce natural resources allow investors to allocate assets among companies at different stages of development and to profit from transitions between stages.

Based on natural resource company life cycles, the Hera Research Newsletter maximizes profits through deep, fundamental analysis at each stage of development and by moving gains back to earlier-stage companies in a continuous wealth-creation process.

Hera Research covers a pipeline of high-quality natural resource companies at different stages of development. The companies span discovery and production of gold, silver, and platinum group metals, select base metals, oil and gas, green energy, agriculture, rare earth elements, uranium, and more.

Discover the unique value of the Hera Research Newsletter by visiting:

http://www.heraresearch.com/newsletter.html

Or call Ron Hera at 360-339-8541x101.



The central bank of Saudi Arabia, which is the only Middle Eastern member of the G20 group of developed and emerging economies, rarely comments on its reserve strategy.

Gold, which has tumbled from a record high of above $1,920 an ounce, is another asset of little interest to the Saudi central bank due to its volatility, Jasser said.

"We have gold in our reserves but we have not bought and we have not sold it in a very long time. It has become a very speculative asset and we do not get into any speculative assets," he said.

Asked whether the central bank was going to stick to this strategy, Jasser said: "Yes".

Boosted by robust oil prices of above $100 per barrel this year, the Saudi central bank's net foreign asset reserves have climbed steadily to a record high of 1.879 trillion riyals ($500 billion) in August.

Gold reserves have been unchanged at 1.556 billion riyals since 2008, the central bank's data show.

Jasser also said U.S. Treasuries continued to be "an important safe haven and major asset" in global financial markets.

"62 percent of global reserves are still in U.S. assets. It is safe to say they are there to stay for a while," he said.

A downgrade of the United States' top-notch "AAA" credit rating by Standard & Poor's in August shocked the global markets but had no adverse impact on its bonds.

Jasser also said banks in the world's top Arab economy were well positioned to deal with any upcoming shocks as well as the European debt crisis. Capital adequacy for banks was north of 17 percent with most of it Tier 1 capital.

"That's very robust. Second, our banks sources of funding are predominantly domestic from domestic deposits which is a reasonably stable source of funding," he said, standing in front of the G20 meeting venue at a sprawling complex of Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry.

"Most of the lending is domestic also so the exposure to the outside is very limited and therefore we are very confident that our banking system is well positioned to withstand any stress emanating from what's happening in Europe," he said.

Robust lending growth to the private sector of more than 9 percent in the first 10 months of the year indicated strong demand, while inflation has stabilized in a tight range of 4.6-4.9 percent and should begin trending down, Jasser said.

"Our economy is doing very well and is expected to continue next year. This year, I have forecast that we will have at least 5 percent growth and probably something close to that next year," he said.

Analysts polled by Reuters in September expected the $447 billion Saudi economy to expand by 6.5 percent this year and 4.5 percent in 2012 helped by an estimated $130 billion boost in social spending, or nearly 30 percent of GDP.

Jasser said interest rates settings were appropriate at the moment with no signs of inflation coming from monetary impetus.

"I still think it is an appropriate setting now until we see inflation due to monetary impetus," he said.

Asked whether that meant credit growth needed to be in double digits, Jasser said: "Something like that. And it also depends on credit whether it is going to productive activities and leading to growth one would not worry too much about it, if it is going to finance speculative activities one has to worry."

The Saudi central bank has been keeping its repo rate at 2 percent since January 2009 and reverse repo rate at 0.25 percent since June 2009. It needs to hold its key rates near U.S. benchmarks to avoid excessive pressures on its dollar peg.

* * *

Join GATA here:

The Silver Summit
Thursday-Friday, October 20-21, 2011
Davenport Hotel, Spokane, Washington

http://cambridgehouse.com/conference-details/the-silver-summit-2011/48

New Orleans Investment Conference
Wednesday-Saturday, October 26-29, 2011
Hilton New Orelans Riverside Hotel

http://www.neworleansconference.com/

Support GATA by purchasing gold and silver commemorative coins:

https://www.amsterdamgold.eu/gata/index.asp?BiD=12

Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Golden Phoenix Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire and Reopen Santa Rosa Gold Mine in Panama

Company Press Release
Monday, September 19, 2011

SPARKS, Nevada -- Golden Phoenix Minerals Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: GPXM) has signed a definitive agreement to acquire a 60 percent interest, with an option to buy an additional 20 percent interest, in the Santa Rosa gold mine in Panama, now owned by Silver Global S.A., a Panamanian corporation.

Santa Rosa produced more than 100,000 ounces of gold from 1996 to 1998 before being closed in part to low gold prices, which are now more than five times higher.

Golden Phoenix intends to acquire its initial 60 percent interest in Santa Rosa by acquiring 60 percent of the share capital of a recently created company under the name Golden Phoenix Panama S.A., formed to hold and operate the mine.

Tom Klein, CEO of Golden Phoenix says: "The agreement establishes a solid framework from which we can advance Mina Santa Rosa to production-ready status."

For Golden Phoenix's complete statement, please visit:

http://goldenphoenix.us/press-release/golden-phoenix-signs-definitive-ac...



Weldon - ECB Forced to Print, Gold’s Lowest Target $3,000

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 09:33 AM PDT

With gold and silver finishing the week higher, King World News interviewed Greg Weldon, Head of Weldon Financial. Weldon has a global following of some of the wealthiest investors in the world including individuals, institutions and financial firms. When asked about his take on the ongoing crisis, Weldon stated, "The contagion is still raging and it's too soon to celebrate.  This is the problem I have with thinking any of these solutions they are going to come up with are really solutions at all because 25 of the 27 nations (in Europe) are in violation of the rules on debt and deficits.  So how are these nations going to bail each other out?  They are all in the same boat."


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

The Biggest Market Headfake Ever: Is A Wholesale French Bank Liquidity Run The Sole Reason For The Euro, And S&P, Surge?

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 09:19 AM PDT

Over the past two weeks, there is one simple thing that has been bugging skeptical macro observers: namely the paradox of i) just how ugly the European funding and liquidity situations have gotten, on the one hand, confirmed by the blow out in French bond yields (the French-Bund 10 year spread just hit an all time record yesterday) as well as continuing deterioration in credit spreads across core European nations, yet, on the other, ii) the euro, especially in that critical pair the EURUSD, has seen one of its most explosive rises in recent history, which as Zero Hedge pointed out yesterday, has totally decorrelated with the French-Bund spread, to which it had been firmly 'pegged' previously. As a result of ii), equity markets have surged due to legacy correlation arbs, which see Euro strength, and hence dollar weakness, as an empirical signal of equity "cheapness", which in turn leads all algos to treat a rise in the EURUSD as a buying signal. So how is it that even with the interbank liquidity situation in Europe frozen and getting worse, further keeping in mind that European banks are now expected to (or have already commenced - see yesterday's move in PrimeX) engage in widespread asset liquidations, that broad market risk is perceived as cheap? Simple. As the following note by Deutsche Bank's Alan Ruskin explains, the sole reason for the EUR (and hence S&P and global 100% correlated equity risk) surge in the past 9 days is not driven by any latent "optimism" that Europe will fix itself, but simply due to the previously discussed wholesale asset liquidations (as none other than the FT already noted), which on the margin are explicitly EUR positive due to FX repatriation, courtesy of the post-sale conversion of USDs to EURs. Which means that the ever so gullible equity market has just experienced one of the biggest headfakes in history, and has misinterpreted a pervasive European, though mostly French, scramble to procure liquidity at any cost by dumping various USD-denominated assets, as a risk on signal!

In other words, an internal bank run has somehow been interpreted to be stock positive... And there is your explanation for not only the paradoxical surge in the EURUSD and S&P, but why the correlation between the EURUSD and the Bund-France spread has completely broken down. Expect all of this to promptly, and very violently, correct once the market understand what an idiot it has been in the past two weeks.

From Deutsche Bank:

In the last few days there has been talk that European bank repatriation of capital may be behind EUR strength. Setting aside the timing of asset sales, and the reduced universe of potential bidders for these assets, it is worth considering what happens when a European bank sells USD assets.  European banks in aggregate are regarded as having a still sizable shortfall of USD liabilities. The BIS has done some of the most comprehensive work on the USD shortage (see in particularly working paper:  www.bis.org/publ/work291.pdf  ).  The most recent data for the end of 2010 (see the latest BIS annual report page 104), suggested the funding shortage had declined by at least half compared to before the 2008 crisis.  More recently. the dependence on cross currency funding has gone up again, with the decline in US money funding.  (DB's Bill Prophet showed EUR region CDs of 7 of the 10 largest US money funds fell by over $70bn from May through September).   Given this collapse, it is likely that European banks that do successfully sell USD assets, will try maintain the corresponding USD liability to mitigate against USD term funding that may not be rolled in the future.  If a European bank sells a USD asset, it probably reduces the European Bank shortage of USDs by the sales amount.   A smaller 'USD shortage', at the margin reduces the risk of a short USD squeeze of the sort seen in 2008, and to that extent is a minor USD negative, and EUR positive.  It also fits with the EUR cross currency basis swaps coming in slightly of late, although this almost certainly has more to do with global risk appetite.  This marginal USD negative, EUR positive impact, should not however be confused with a foreign exchange transaction whereby USD's are converted into EUR.

Even Deutsche Bank is scratching its head to explain the dichotomy between the funding market and general risk. They do, however, provide the only real explanation, as opposed to the widely trumpeted by market cheerleaders ridiculous explanation that this is merely the latest "hope" rally. Ridiculous, because if that was the case, one would see a thawing of interbank liquidity and defaults spreads. As Zero Hedge readers know, 100% the opposite has happened.

Note also that the EUR is going in the opposite direction to much purer gauges of EUR tensions in the bond market. The collapse in OATS today is a major story. This is not least because France is experiencing the negative side of its (still) AAA status and being a member of the core  -  the fiscal transfers are going toward the periphery and away from the core in terms of ability to tap the EFSF for bank recaps, and possibly bond insurance/guarantees. In the past, we have noted that the periphery flows fleeing toward the core has tended to leave the EUR trading like a closed system to the outside world, which is one explanation for surprising EUR resilience to periphery travails.  The latest French balance of payments data (http://www.banque-france.fr/gb/statistiques/economie/economie-balance/ec... )  again shows large French portfolio inflows that are very surprising, although the large errors and omissions do suggest the data is incomplete.  (In the future, Target 2 balances will be another vehicle to use to check the degree to which inflows are being concentrated in Germany solely).   In any event, instability in the French bond market has the capacity to significantly reduce points of refuge for risk averse funds at the EUR's (shrinking) core, and adds to DB FX team's doubt about the sustainability of the EUR's rally...

And so on.

Naturally, the Eurocrats will be delighted to associate the run up in risk assets and the European currency as a confirmation that the market is interpreting further lies, innuendo, and confusion as a risk on indicator, and is encouraging their behavior, when nothing is further from the truth. However, the biggest beneficiary of the recent move is none other than the insolvent French banking system, whose very own liquidity run has caused asset values to soar, on an epic misinterpretation of underlying market signals, and thus sell even more into market strength, when in fact the market should be selling alongside France...

As for unwind catalysts for this most insidious market move, we are confident that the inability of the G20 to come up with any resolution over the weekend in Paris, nor the Eurozone Summit in one week to actually present any relevant details vis-a-vis the continent's bailout, or the EFSF's expansion into some multi-trillion Bailoutstein monster, will not be met too happily by a market which has just realized it has been thoroughly fooled by the cash-crunched French banking system.


Gold mines in the spotlight

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 08:04 AM PDT

Efforts to extract the yellow metal continue to grab the headlines. Here are a few of the sites currently getting attention.


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Signature Trends

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 07:51 AM PDT

The weekly trends in gold, silver and the XAU are all in a negative posture but with an improved tone. Please see my general two month outlook for these areas here. Secondly, I would like to emphasize that price improvements in the longer time frames always start first in the daily time frame. To that end, the very powerful Signature Trend Series is now complete and includes three indicators in daily time frames with current updates. Extensive descriptions are included. They are as follows: [LIST] [*]Although not a signature trend indicator, the Pendulum SRA Cycle Indicator is very highly ranked and regarded. This indicator is indeed the "pendulum" in Market Pendulum. [*]The DSX Formula relates Sir Isaac Newton's laws of motion to investments in a unique way. [*]The TDL Weekly Indicator emphasizes a train on longer term trend and track. [*]The SPDX includes a speedometer, GPS device and direction finder, all in one easy readout. [/LIST] All indicat...


THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISION BERNANKE WILL EVER MAKE

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 06:58 AM PDT

As many of you know who have read my work in the past, the dollar put in a major three year cycle low back in May. It has been my expectation all along that the rally out of that major bottom would coincide with another deflationary period and the next leg down in the stock secular bear market. So far this has been the case as stocks topped in May at the same time the dollar bottomed. 


After a 15 week consolidation the dollar has initiated its first powerful thrust up out of that major bottom. As you can see in the chart below the rally out of a three year cycle low generally lasts at least a year and turns the 200 day moving average back up.



I've also noted that once the rally out of a three year cycle low rises above the 200 day moving average, it shouldn't dip back below that level, at least not for the next year to year and a half.

Sometime in the next few days the dollar will put in a daily cycle low and bounce. My expectation is that it will either bounce off of the 200 day moving average or bottom slightly above that level. It's what comes next after that bounce that is absolutely critical.


Bernanke is now about to make the most important decision of his life. The correct decision is to allow the dollar to appreciate, which in turn would continue to drive the stock market down into its next four year cycle low in the fall of 2012, and would  facilitate a much-needed recession to cleanse at least some of the massive debt that has been accumulated in the last two years. That is the correct decision. It is also a very hard decision because it will lead to severe short-term pain and undoubtedly another depression on the same scale as 1932.


However if Bernanke chooses to kick the can down the road again and continues his failed policy of monetary debasement then  the dollar is at great risk of forming an extreme left translated three year cycle.


For those of you that are new to cycles analysis, a left translated cycle is generally associated with a bear market. Left translated means that the cycle tops in the front half of its cycle timing band. In this case any top that forms prior to 18 months would signal a left translated three year cycle. Furthermore the more extreme translated a cycle is the more severe the decline tends to be, simply because the cycle has a lot more time to move lower.


If Bernanke decides to avoid short-term pain and kicks the can down the road again with further currency debasement, then the dollar is at great risk of having already put in the top of this three year cycle.

The unintended consequences of a three year cycle that tops in only four months are, to put it mildly, horrendous. That would indicate that the dollar is going to head generally lower for the next three years culminating in a hyper-inflationary event at the next three year cycle low in 2014.



The next couple of weeks and months are going to be of grave importance. The dollar needs to find support at the 200 day moving average and resume moving strongly higher. That would of course put pressure on the stock market and probably terminate the current bear market rally somewhere around the 200 day moving average (roughly SPX 1270ish) before the next leg down begins.

If however the bounce out of the now due daily cycle low is weak and the dollar rolls over quickly and moves back below the 200 day moving average then all bets are off. Stocks could even rally back to marginal new highs. However that would also guarantee that the CRB has put in its three year cycle low and we are now at the very beginning of an inflationary Holocaust.




If Bernanke makes the wrong decision then gold is on the verge of moving into the bubble phase of the secular bull market. That being said gold should still experience one more move down in the next couple of weeks as the dollar rallies out of its impending daily cycle low. After that, everything hinges on Bernanke's decision whether or not to continue his failed monetary policies.


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

On the Edge with Jeff Berwick

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 06:39 AM PDT

We interview Jeff Berwick of Dollar Vigilante.


Mining giant sparks Europe's new gold rush

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 06:13 AM PDT

The river runs red in Rosia Montana. The rouge-coloured run-off of zinc, iron, arsenic and other sulphides from nearly 2,000 years of gold mining make the waterway in Romania's Transylvanian mountains live up to the area's name, which means red mountain in Romanian.


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Gold vs. Gold Mining: The Wrong Question, Part II

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 05:09 AM PDT

You don't need to own Gold Mining stocks to hope they might start beating plain bullion soon...

read more


Gold Signals The End

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 04:24 AM PDT

by Hubert Moolman:

Gold remains our best means of economic measurement. It is not a perfect or 100% consistent measure of wealth, but it is our best. Due to its monetary properties, gold can be used to measure wealth across generations. Just like we have the sun and moon to discern the times and seasons, I believe, we have gold to discern changes in wealth. It is interesting that the sun is often compared to gold, and the moon to silver. Just like a day in the Middle Ages is comparable to a day in this century, an ounce of gold in the Middle Ages is comparable to one today.

Currently we use fiat currency, like the dollar, for economic measurement. However, this creates a huge distortion due to the fiat currency being highly unstable. Can you imagine what would be the effect on our planet if we did not use the normal cycles that the sun and moon provides us with? Our ability to produce food for example, could be severely disrupted, leading to famine or possible extinction of mankind.

Read More @ HubertMoolman.Wordpress.com


When Money Dies, Some Will Prosper

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 03:35 AM PDT

from WealthCycles:

"When the currency system as we know it dies, some people will become very wealthy," begins a special report from the Casey Research/Sprott Inc. Summit, When Money Dies. It's an attention-getting lede sentence, and a sentiment that will sound quite familiar to readers of WealthCycles.com and the writings of Michael Maloney, who was a presenter at the Casey Research Summit held earlier this month in Phoenix.

The report transcribes a roundtable discussion between Rick Rule, founder and chairman of brokerage firm Global Resource Investments, and two Casey Research editors, Louis James and Marin Katusa.

Asked by the moderator "who killed money," Rule replies:

Read More @ WealthCycles.com


Gold Opportunities Under the Mattress and in the Ground

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 03:35 AM PDT

According to Edward Karr, CEO of RAMPartners, the band is tuning up and the guests are just starting to arrive. Instead of selling before the party really gets going, he advises keeping a "decent percentage" of cash to take advantage of opportunities to buy both physical gold and junior mining stocks. His real bottom-line advice in this exclusive Gold Report interview? Tap into what makes you happy in life.


Any Greek Restructuring Should Be Designed To Trigger A Credit Event

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 03:34 AM PDT

From Peter Tchir of TF Market Advisors

Any Greek Restructuring Should Be Designed To Trigger A Credit Event

As talk about an actual restructuring of Greek debt increases, the EU continues to think avoiding a CDS Credit Event is a good thing.  More and more stories and leaks indicate that a real restructuring of Greek debt is on the table, with write-offs of as much as 50%.  Whether it will be real, permanent reductions in principle this time, or some other form of principle protected rollover with a subjective NPV calculation like the 21% haircut, remains to be seen.  In any case, the EU continues to head down the path of bending over backwards to avoid trigger a CDS Credit Event.

They are wrong to be avoiding a Credit Event on the Hellenic Republic.  If they are really pushing for a true restructuring where banks and insurance companies are for all intents and purposes forced to accept a big haircut, they should want to trigger a CDS Credit Event.  They are allegedly avoiding a credit event because it "could unleash a cascade of losses" according to a bloomberg article.  That just makes no sense.  It also seems that pride plays a role as the EU doesn't want to be impacted by the stigma of a default – a 50% write-off is even, but they don't want to be called defaulters.  That is plain silly.  They also seem to want to punish speculators, and this is where they really have it wrong, not only are few hedge funds short Greece via CDS at this time, the problems this creates for bank risk management desks is big and will have long term negative consequences for sovereign debt demand.

Bank Credit Risk Management Back to the Dark Ages

JP Morgan is one of the few institutions that have come through the financial crisis with an enhanced reputation.  Their skill for
managing through the problems has been clear and the respect for the firm and Mr. Dimon in particular has grown.  It is their risk management that has been a key to their success.  On their earnings call they were able to point to low "net" exposure to Europe.  They had "Portfolio hedging" for their European exposures of $5.2 billion, 80% of which was related to sovereigns.  So it is possible that JPM was short about $4.2 billion of sovereign CDS to manage their overall exposure to Europe.  If the regulators can pressure banks into taking big write-downs on their positions and make their CDS ineffective, how long before Mr. Dimon realizes he has to do something else to manage his exposure.

If buying CDS is unlikely to provide the relief it should, the only way to reduce economic exposure is to sell assets.  JPM would likely be ahead of the curve and sell their CDS while it still had value, and sell bonds/loans at the same time.  Other banks and investors will eventually realize that they cannot rely on "net" exposures, when the regulators corrupt the product.  Investors will start to focus on gross exposures because they will doubt the ability of banks to ever monetize their hedges.  All the big banks, still likely to be risk averse, even after some multi trillion euro EFSF announcement, will want to maintain low economic exposure to European sovereign debt.  If they don't believe their hedges will protect them because they would once again be forced to write down assets and not collect on their hedge, the only prudent risk management decision is to reduce assets.

By eliminating a tool for banks to hedge their exposure by blatantly working around it, the EU will reduce future demand for bonds.  Not what they are trying to accomplish.  The whole point of the EFSF and other programs is to stimulate demand for bonds, and they will have achieved the opposite as big banks will have to reduce bond holdings since they will realize they cannot rely on their hedges.

At the other extreme, some weak banks, the ones who likely wrote CDS rather than buying bonds because of the leverage, will want to write even more CDS.  Why would they ever want to buy bonds when the EU just taught them that selling CDS is "free money."  The weaker the institution, the more appealing that trade will be.  So in the future, the unregulated, difficult to track CDS risk, will all be the hands of the weakest institutions – again, a result that does nothing good in the long run.

The Facts Do Not Show a Risk of "Cascading Losses" From a CDS Credit Event on Greece

According to DTCC, the net Hellenic Republic exposure in the entire system is €2.7 billion.  Yes, the open longs (or open shorts) are a total of €2.7 billion.  That is trivial compared to the €330 billion or so of Greek bonds outstanding.  It isn't even 1% of the exposure the system has via the bond market.  With a 50% haircut, bond investors will lose about €165 billion, and in the CDS market, a total of €1.3 billion would find its way from the net sellers of protection to the net buyers of protection.  If the regulators and EU are sure the system can handle the bond write-offs, the write-offs for CDS are a rounding error, at best.

What about the "transfer mechanism"?  Isn't there some way the chain of payments could break down?  There gross notional for Hellenic Republic CDS is €54 billion.  These represent a combination of things, but primarily dealer to dealer trades where one dealer has an ultimate seller, and the other dealer has an ultimate buyer, and the trades run through them since they either don't fact that client or weren't the "axe" at the time the client was putting on the trade.  There are also curve trades.  Curve trades will collapse down. The street will run "trioptima" or some equivalent to net the risks down.  Banks are well prepared for the settlement of CDS.  The settlement of Lehman went smoothly in spite of concern at the time.  There is no reason to expect it not to go smoothly this time.  Once again, JPM's quarterly Earnings Presentation has some useful insights.  They have $8.2 billion of Trading Exposure to Europe, which is "predominantly client-driven derivatives exposure of $14.2 billion, offset by collateral of $6.7 billion (95%+ held in cash)."  I'm willing to assume that JPM is doing a good job on their counterparty risk management.  Other big banks are going to be very similar.

But let's look at a worst case.  Assume one bank ("Dumb Bank") has written the entire €2.7 billion of net outstanding Greek CDS.  That bank then owes €1.3 billion.  If the bank doesn't have the money to pay, they would not pay the money to whoever they sold the protection to.  They would have sold it to one of the "Dealer" banks, one of the 20-30 biggest banks that make markets in CDS as part of their core fixed income platforms.  If they had trades on with several bank, then each of those banks would take a loss.  It would not change their obligation to pay on their contracts?  Does anyone really believe that one of the big banks couldn't afford that €1.3 billion loss?  It would be painful, but they would absorb it, and the rest of the payments would flow through the system.  They would honor obligation to whoever they sold CDS to, in spite of not receiving the money.  That is how the system works.  The extreme example where one bank provided that much counterparty exposure to one institution that couldn't pay would is unrealistic, but at least from the CDS chain of events, the losses would end at the big bank(s) that made that decision.  No Contagion.

The Dealer Bank would then proceed against Dumb Bank to collect its claim.  Dumb Bank would enter into bankruptcy in some form or another.  Bondholders would have a loss, and Dumb Bank's other counterparties would all have to scramble to replace risk.  So this does have the potential to create contagion, but is the market really so stupid that no one would have noticed how bad Dumb Bank's finances were?  The debt wouldn't be trading anywhere close to par if the bank had such big exposures and was in that much trouble.  The loss to any single bank from triggering CDS is not likely to be enough to force them into bankruptcy.  Unless a bank has been able to hide massive exposures from the market neither the share price nor the debt of these banks should be significantly affected by monetizing a mark to market loss already priced in, and in many cases, already collateralized.

The system is just not that fragile, and the possible payments from triggering CDS are negligible relative to the losses that will be experienced from the bond market write-downs.  If the EU believes the financial system can handle writing down the €330 billion of bonds (and I believe it can), then it is highly unlikely that the additional losses on €2.7 billion of CDS will be the straw that breaks the camel's back.  It is just not plausible as the number is small, and the counterparty risk management is actually pretty good, and this would require gross negligence in virtually each and every bank to trigger the contagion risk the EU seems to fear.

Pride and Punishment

An actual restructuring where financial institutions permanently write-off 50% of the principle owed is a default by any other name.  Pretending it isn't a default so you can say you have never defaulted is just bizarre.  The loss can be called anything you want, but the end result is the same.  Worrying about the semantics of having had a CDS Credit Event is just absurd.  You can say that you "are slightly above ideal weight" but people will still no you are fat.

And who is getting punished?  Reading between the lines, the EU seems to be licking their chops at punishing all the hedge fund speculators who are short Greece via CDS.  Well, guess what?  They are NOT short Greek CDS anymore.  The hedge funds are now generally flat or even long Greece via CDS.  All you need to do is think about it for a moment.    Greece trades at 62 points up front.  So on a $10 million trade, you pay or receive $6.2 million.  If you felt governments weren't going to manipulate the situation, where would you think the CDS would trade after a Credit Event?  What is the recovery rate then?  I think assuming anything lower than 20% is extremely aggressive.  So you are risking 62 to make 18?  That would require a high degree of certainty, or an even lower recovery assumption.  It would also require you not to have read a newspaper or turned on the TV for the past month.  The G-20, the IMF, the EU, the ECB, are all lined up to try and prevent a default, and even more importantly, continue to state that they want to avoid triggering a CDS Credit Event.  You are making a bet against their ability to circumvent the rules.  From a risk/reward standpoint, I would not be short Greek CDS.  If anything I would have sold Greece CDS here (especially with talk of a 50% settlement).  I would much rather be short French or Belgium CDS.  They have a lot more opportunity to widen, with a limited ability to tighten.

But if hedge funds aren't short Greek CDS, who is?  Bank hedging desks!  The banks are net short.  The banks do not want to take off their shorts because they don't want to report larger net exposures.  They aren't taking profits on these because optically they cannot report to shareholders increased exposure to Greece.  They have done the same analysis as hedge funds and would like to cut their shorts, but this isn't about making money for the banks anymore, this is about presenting low exposure numbers.  The smart, hedged banks, will be the ones punished.  The EU wants to punish the hedge funds, but all they will do is punish banks that have been most prudent.

And who is rewarded?  Good old dumb bank.  Wrote some CDS because they could get more leverage, and here they are being rewarded by the EU.  The efforts to punish are likely to punish the wrong people and further reward the weakest institutions.  At one time hedge funds were short Greece via CDS, but at one time I was young and athletic – things change over time.  The EU should get over their anger and think responsibly.  That is the only way to truly start correcting the core of the problems.  Lashing out by manipulating markets and rules will do more harm than good.


US Dollar Gann Angle Trend Study

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 03:31 AM PDT

You can use the Gann Angle 1x1 to check your trends, when price fails to break it, a change in trend can be expected. More so those that where disappointed may cause a substantial move as they abandon positions aggressively. Read More...



This Past Week in Gold

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 03:29 AM PDT

Summary: Long term - on major buy signal. Short term - on mixed signals. We have new buy signals and set ups this week and we are allocating modestly with tight stops. Read More...



Guest Post: Breaking Points: Recognizing The Signs Of Painful Cultural Shift

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 02:35 AM PDT


Submitted by Brandon Smith from Alt- Market

Breaking Points: Recognizing The Signs Of Painful Cultural Shift

 

Through the ages, nations and cultures of spectacular proportion and prominence have risen to prosperity, and fallen to chaos, on very particular and fundamental principles. In some cases, these great and terrible declines have taken centuries to culminate (as was the story of the Roman Empire), and only a few years in others (the Soviet Union comes to mind). In every example of societal destabilization, however, there were many signs of danger long before the final plunge; some unique to each particular culture, and some common to all. One of the most enduring and frightening similarities between crumbling nations is an overwhelming belief amongst the people that they have somehow "advanced" beyond the need for concern. Each self-destructing society presumed itself invincible. Each country thought itself the pinnacle of human potential, only to discover yet again that in abandoning or subverting the principles of freedom, and the bedrock pillars of conscience, reason, and wisdom, they had become merely another footnote in a long marathon of footnotes.

Ultimately, the vast and sordid history of collapse could be summarized simply as a series of breaking points; moments at which opposing ideals and forces hyperextend the prevailing mechanics of a system, changing it entirely.

Some of these events have produced surprising strides of understanding and political progress, as prevailed after the American Revolution. Others led to dark and mindless collectivist nightmares that fog men's eyes and hearts, as that which occurred after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. The difference is one of focus. Imperialist (elitist) ideologies were deemed unacceptable in both revolutions, but the tides of each conflict leaned towards entirely separate values. Individual liberty in the West, and collective safety and sacrifice in the East. In America, the uprising was led by common men and the target was clear. In Russia, the uprising was led by elitists posing as common men, and the target was obscured. In America, much of the public assumed roles as arbiters and political engineers. In communist Russia, much of the public was oblivious to such responsibility, and only subject to engineering. Two revolutions in the name of ending tyranny with two entirely different initial outcomes…

I bring up these opposing paradigms not to spark another endless debate over the merits of communism versus capitalism, but to highlight a growing potential for a new brand of revolution in modern day America, now cutting through the surface, which may very well culminate in one of the two finales described above. More perhaps than any other time memorable, centralist and statist visions are today clashing with individualist and Constitutionalist pleadings for sanity. The air grows heavy and ripe for ignition. More even than any economic indicator, social indicators point in the direction of conflict and widespread malfunction. The question of "if" in terms of citizen dissent and the inevitable lashing response of government is no longer asked. Now, the question of "when" has risen to the surface.

To predict the exact timing of a breaking point is impossible, but there are signals to watch for; social and political attitudes to monitor and examine. After analyzing the shifts of multiple nations and cultures over thousands of years of human record, a pattern does, indeed, emerge. Similar developments in our times should not be taken lightly…

1) The Rise Of Moral Relativism

Inherent conscience is a vital artery to a healthy society. When that artery is cut, entire structures and peoples die. There is no way around this, as history has shown. Cynics, often utilizing a highly limited understanding of the processes of mass psychology and individual psychology, tend to confuse the word "conscience" with the concept of taboo. Taboos are man-made morals, and are commonly applied as a method of social control by oligarchs and collectives, just as many laws are created to appease sometimes dubious bureaucracies. Conscience is NOT man-made, but an inborn process that human beings draw from unconsciously, and which true honor, compassion, and sincerity are derived. Conscience is an intuitive product, not intellectual.

Moral relativism, by comparison, is a kind of emotional inhibitor which allows people to mechanize their thinking, and rationalize any activity no matter how despicable, as long as that activity is rooted in a "logical" framework. Logic, however, is limited…

Interestingly, there are some forms of theoretical mathematics which allow false conclusions to be presented as fact, and this same methodology of fuzzy logic is consistently used by moral relativists to achieve the "appearance" of reason. At bottom, intellectual prowess accomplishes little without the disciplines of experience, emotion, and insight. Cultures which widely abandon the guidelines of conscience always find themselves subject to collapse, whether economic or political. Without the ability to feel empathy for the victims of one's actions, any disaster becomes possible.

2) The Displacement Of Cultural Subsections

A society that maintains healthy appearances by purposely displacing and marginalizing certain belief systems or political stances is by its very nature self-destructive. For progress to be made, inclusion of ideas is paramount. Ideas must be allowed to stand on their own merit and not be victimized by the biases of an elite minority, or in some instances, an ignorant majority. Strong and meaningful ideas must be given space to thrive while bad ideas must be allowed to fall to the wayside. This happens when open discussion is given fair play. Suppression of discussion, whether by force or by stealth, leads to an inability of the people to form a true identity. Forced consensus ends not in stability, but in madness.

3) Distraction Over Substance

Distracted people are uncaring people. A nation distracted by its own immediate desires over the concerns of the future is completely incapable of acting in its own best interest. Distraction comes in many forms, from vapid entertainment, to disinformation, to war and economic uncertainty. While most people are more than able to produce their own distractions, often governments will lend a helping hand in order to dissuade the masses from participation in the decision making processes. This includes the dilution of educational options and/or the co-option of the educational system altogether.

You will find that in nearly every collapse of modern times, the citizenry found themselves surprised and shell shocked despite numerous and easily identifiable warnings. You will also find that the stunned populace was usually obsessed with any existing method to avoid involvement in the workings of the system in which they lived. They were caught off guard because, in the end, they were more comfortable not knowing the details. Comfort at the price of vigilance ends in devastation.

4) When Law Becomes Tyranny

Law, at least as far as the fundamentals are concerned, is designed to protect citizens as well as authorities from undue actions and accusations. At its best, law shields us from our own follies, which may include the allowed ascension of poor leadership. At its worst, law is no longer used as a tool for protecting the public from error and malice, and is instead used as a tool for enslavement.

When a culture elevates and worships law over the contents of their own consciences, the abuse of law for the sake of control is imminent. Law does not trump heart, yet many past societies have been convinced to follow immoral laws all while mistaking their actions for "civic duty". When law becomes infallible, fallible government becomes god, and no nation will ever be able to sustain such a delusion of grandeur for very long without reaping catastrophe.

5) Force Over Reason

Force is used only in two instances within a domestic political environment; when a controlling entity seeks to acquire or maintain power after fear and disinformation have failed, and when a rebellious public seeks to undo the wrongs done and reason has gone ignored. A nation run by dishonest men is already a supreme candidate for extreme collapse, but when despots turn to violent policies to silence dissent, you can be sure that conflict is soon to follow. The level of this tension will be readily visible in the militant presence of the government in public buildings, on the roads, and even in the neighborhoods of the citizenry. A standing army upon the soil of a country, regardless of supposed rationale, is a recipe for a breakdown that goes far beyond the more manageable effects of financial distress and into the realm of lasting and vicious war.

6) False Paradigms And Mistaken Enemies

A country near bedlam is usually filled with people seeking not just answers, but someone, anyone, to blame. This need for "justice" can be very misguided, and results in the projections of our own terrors onto innocent bystanders. Collapse is very often preceded by a swelling wave of attacks, usually directed at groups contrary to the majority belief. Political parties become factions. Ideals become battle cries. Fervor for retribution takes over. All the while, the true culprits (who are normally not a part of either side) sit back, relax, and turn the public in on itself. A frantic nation is an easily manipulated nation. Divided and fragile, such systems degrade while the source of the problem remains hidden.

7) Desperation And Loss Of Will

A culture on the verge of sliding into full spectrum disintegration is generally not very chipper, however, when this despair results in the handing over of personal liberty for the sake of so called "security", an avalanche of regret and wild compensation in the form of moral relativism results. No matter what the state of a nation and its people, the will to move forward and to act for the betterment of the future can and does change everything. The blackest days of dread and ill omen are no match for man's ability to endure when he holds the truth dear. No obstacle is insurmountable. No enemy unbeatable. But, when that will is lost, so too is everything else.

The concentration and frequency of the above elements can easily reveal the point at which a country is in respect to collapse. America now has many of these diseases at one stage or another, and in certain ways, has surpassed historic examples to form a never-before-seen dynamic for global turmoil. Currently, citizens are turning in greater and greater numbers to activism and protest, but the focus has moved away from the elites (central bankers and globalists) who deserve the largest portion of the public's ire. We have allowed deflections to go unchecked for too long, and the unwillingness of arbitrarily delineated sides (false Left and false Right) to reconcile at least until the larger threat is removed is setting our culture in motion into the depths of a nightmare we are not ready to handle. Such loss has happened before, and, through courage, understanding, and tenacity, it has also been undone before. The choice is ours. It always has been.


The Best of the Week

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 02:21 AM PDT

Synopsis: 

Welcome to the weekend edition of Casey Daily Dispatch, a compilation of our favorite stories from the week for the time-stressed readers.

Dear Reader,

Welcome to the weekend edition of Casey Daily Dispatch, a compilation of our favorite stories from the week for the time-stressed readers.

Of course, if you want to read all of the Daily Dispatches from the week, you may do so in the archives at CaseyResearch.com.


Economic Myths

By Vedran Vuk

I read an article at Mother Jones magazine titled 6 Big Economic Myths Debunked. It's quite a saddening piece, as it shows the power of confirmation bias. Let's briefly look at these myths one at a time:

1. "The stimulus failed." Oh yes, what a success that stimulus was. This claim is backed by the Congressional Budget Office's and two other private firms' reports. Other reports – as well as the price tag – are ignored. Some have estimated that the stimulus cost $278,000 per job. Even if the stimulus did create the jobs, at that price it's an abysmal failure. The government could have just written checks instead.

The article notes that the stimulus should have been bigger. How much bigger – $2 or $3 trillion? It was already enormous. Myth debunked? I think not.

2. "The deficit is our biggest problem." There's some truth to this, but the writers don't see the huge problem with their own theory. If we borrow a lot now at low interest rates, sure the economy might recover and pay dividends on the growth. However, it's not that simple. What if the plan doesn't work? Suppose the US spends a trillion dollars, but only increases the deficit without reviving the economy? Then the country would actually be worse off. Hey, that outcome sounds familiar for some reason…

On a side note, Bernanke is making the same gamble by pumping trillions into the economy, hoping that it will recover before inflation kicks in.

3. "Lower taxes are the best way to grow the economy." I have to partially agree. Cutting taxes always helps, but tax cuts alone can't do all the lifting. The authors cite only one source for the "Aha! Myth busted" assertion. However, there's probably more economic literature on tax cuts than almost anything else – one citation should hardly convince anyone given the large body of research out there.

4. "Regulatory uncertainty is clogging the economy." This is my favorite one. The authors include a survey of small-business owners listing their top problem; sales were first. This "myth" is a perfect example of being blind to the truth. Please look at the chart provided in the article below. What's number two on the list at 20%? Yes, it's taxes! Now, please refer to the author's third myth, "lower taxes are the best way to grow the economy." I just had another thought… hmm… do you think lower taxes might help sales? Sorry, I'm getting too logical here; let's move on to another interesting point.

Add taxes, regulation and red tape, and inflation percentages from that table... all together, they add up to  46% of the top-ranked problem. Almost half of small business' problems are coming from the government in some form!

5. "Obama is debasing the dollar." The authors point out that a weaker currency is great for American exports, and that fixing our trade deficit is the only way to fix our long-term budget deficit. Hence, devaluing the dollar is a great thing. First of all, please refer to the author's myth number two, "The deficit is our biggest problem." Why should the reader care if debasing the dollar lowers the deficit? The authors just said that the long-term national debt isn't important right now.

I'm just pointing out the internal contradictions; I don't think our readers need a full explanation of why printing trillions is not a good idea.

6. "If you unshackle the rich, they'll rev up the economy." Isn't this "myth" number three again, just with a focus on the rich?

I don't have a problem with people voicing their opinions, but it's saddening when someone represents debatable issues as "myth busting." Furthermore, it's even worse when a writer's piece makes internal contradictions or points to other apparent conclusions in its own citations. This sort of blind confirmation bias is, in my opinion, one of the most frightening things about politics and humanity in general. The truth can really be right in front of someone's nose, and he won't get it.


Late September M&A Snapshot

By Andrey Dashkov

In the first half of 2011, gold mergers and acquisitions (M&A) were fewer and further between. PricewaterhouseCoopers reports in its mid-2011 mining deals update:

Entities with a primary interest in gold were still the most sought after targets by volume in 2011 representing 31.4% of deal volume, though the value of gold transactions dropped to 12.8% in 2011 from 31% in 2010. In comparison to 2010 where three of the top ten deals were in the gold sector, the first half of 2011 has seen only one of the top ten deals in the gold sector. (Newmont Mining Corp.'s $2.21 billion acquisition of Fronteer Gold Inc.)

It wasn't surprising to see M&A activity in the gold sector slowing as the gold price was racing upward and junior companies got expensive. Things changed in September. As gold was sliding from its historical non-inflation-adjusted highs, shares of junior mining companies dropped sharply. The TSX-V, where most of these companies trade, fell by 25.5% within the same month that gold lost about 15%.

Weakness of this magnitude did not go unnoticed – not only by investors but by companies which had M&A plans. Two deals involving gold stocks were announced late September; let's have a look.

On September 19, Agnico-Eagle (T.AEM) announced a C$255-million (US$257.8-million) acquisition of Grayd Resources (V.GYD), a gold exploration company with its flagship La India project located 70 kilometers from Agnico's Pinos Altos mine in Mexico.

The project is not huge – at 0.5 g/t Au cutoff it hosts 665,000 ounces of gold at 1.03 g/t Au in the Indicated category and 418,000 ounces at 0.96 g/t Au Inferred. The company's mine scenario envisions 92,000-ounce/year production over nine years by the relatively cheap heap leaching method.

The most important numbers, however, lie not in the resource count but in the project economics: At a very conservative US$950 per ounce gold and a 5% discount rate, the project's NPV is US$187 million and an internal rate of return (IRR) is 51%. Cash cost per ounce is moderate at US$507. These excellent figures – in a project basically located next door in a stable mining jurisdiction – resulted in the high premium Agnico is willing to pay for Grayd: 65.7%. GYD shares leapt accordingly, a big win for shareholders.

That week another deal started taking shape, this time in the form of a merger. As part of the arrangement, Takara Resources (V.TKK) will acquire all of the outstanding shares of GoldQuest Mining (V.GQC). The companies market the transaction as a "no-premium" merger, not giving an estimate of the value of the combined entity.

Neither of the two companies is a producer; both are explorers. The purpose of the merger is to develop two properties with open-pit mining potential – one owned by GoldQuest (La Escandalosa) and the other by Takara (Tassawini) – to production stage together under a single operating team.

La Escandalosa is located in Dominican Republic, a relatively mining friendly jurisdiction. The project hosts a NI43-101 compliant Inferred resource of 405,000 ounces (4,863,000 tonnes at 2.6 g/t Au). A preliminary economic assessment is planned for the fourth quarter of 2011, so there are no NPV or IRR data to rely on. There is, however, some information on the project's metallurgy: Preliminary testing showed 98% gold recovery. GoldQuest also mentions that the property is located 17 kilometers from a main road and has hydroelectric potential.

Tassawini is quite different. It is located in Guyana on the site of a past producing mine. From 1907 to 1914, about 11,200 ounces of gold were recovered at Tassawini, which hosts an Indicated resource (at 0.5 g/t Au cutoff) of 437,000 ounces at an average grade of 1.3 g/t Au with an addition of an Inferred resource of 62,000 ounces at 1.0 g/t Au. Although Takara mentions "an in-house scoping study" that lay ground for further preliminary engineering activities at Tassawini, the company hasn't published any economic numbers yet.

This transaction seems full of uncertainties. It looks like a risk-reducing move on part of both companies, which have small projects with uncertain economics that are unlikely to interest any major companies any time soon. Perhaps so, but they are in different countries, where workers speak different languages, and requiring different technical and political skills. We're not surprised, then, that neither of these companies saw their share prices rise as a result of the merger announcement.

In other words, it seems likely that as both metals and junior mining companies correct – which may continue for some time – we'll see more mergers and acquisitions, but not all deals are created equal. Buyer beware.

[Shifting trends worldwide can mean sleepless nights for international investors. The Casey International Speculator team digs relentlessly for the facts, so that only the best companies with the largest profit potential are recommended. Kick the tires with a risk-free subscription for ninety days.]


A Tough Time for Commodities

By the Casey Research Energy Team

In the last few weeks a slow slide in commodity prices – metals in particular – has turned into a full-scale nosedive.

All through 2011 copper had remained essentially between US$4 and $4.50 a pound, but on September 11 it dropped below that range and didn't really stop falling until October 4, when it bottomed at $3.05. Aluminum gained ground in the first half of the year to reach $1.24 per lb. in April, but after losing 10% in the last 30 days it is back below that, at $0.96. The spot price of nickel lost 19% in the last month; zinc prices fell 17%. Precious metals were not spared either: The price of silver shed a whopping 33% in 30 days, while gold is currently down 15% compared to its price on September 6.

Grouping the commodities together really shows how rough the last few months have been. The Standard & Poor's GSCI – an index of raw materials that tracks 24 commodity prices – is down 24% since April, when it hit a 32-month high. On October 4 it touched 572.92, its lowest level since November 26, 2010. Falling metal prices were the main culprit: Silver closed at its lowest price since February, and copper saw its cheapest settlement in 14 months.

The slide in commodity prices ends a period of discord between a global economic story of frailty and impending doom and commodity prices that were holding their ground at or near record highs. The disparity stemmed in large part from opposite outlooks for the world's developed and emerging economies – Europe and the US are struggling to maintain any kind of economic momentum but emerging economies have continued to grow, led by China. Investment actions (encouraged by the printed money stemming from QE2) then heightened that difference, as investors turned to commodity prices to profit from emerging-market growth.

The investments that fed the disparity came from a very broad base. It used to be that investing in commodities was only for institutional players and real market participants, but over the last decade a slew of retail investors have jumped on board the "good-times commodities train." Since the start of the current commodities supercycle in the early 2000s, investing in raw materials shifted from a risky, hard-to-access game to a commonplace portion of most portfolios.

Before, most ordinary investors were only exposed to commodities by owning shares in oil or mining companies. Now, a broad range of commodity-based exchange-traded funds (ETFs) spanning agriculture, energy, and metals have given investors access to direct exposure to raw-material price swings… and the sector has provided such consistent rewards that many financial advisors and pension managers now believe that all ordinary investors should have some slice of their long-term money parked in commodities. The assets of ETFs and similar investment products that hold baskets of commodity futures have increased sixfold since 2007, reaching a value of $37 billion this summer.

In recent months, however, the tide has turned in a major way. Investors and advisors are beating a hasty retreat from all risky holdings, and for many that includes commodities. Current global economic uncertainty is pushing investors toward very low-risk options, starting with US bonds and ending with dividend-paying utilities. Commodities, which were previously better-insulated from retail investor panics, are feeling the pain.

Of course, retail investors abandoning ship only account for a small part of the pressure on commodity prices. Commodity prices are complex beasts, with annual variations relating to contract talks, stocking seasons, de-stocking seasons, currency ratios, and speculative action.

Take copper as an example. China accounts for something like 40% of global copper demand, and its unceasing demand growth helped copper prices rebound quickly after the 2008 recession. Whether this demand growth will continue is a topic of much debate.

The bears point to tightening monetary conditions and a global slowdown to argue that China's economy will grow just 5% this year – a sluggish rate, compared to its double-digit expansions over most years in the last decade. They also point to reports of very large speculative stockpiles in China, accumulated in part as a way to skirt bank lending restrictions imposed by the Chinese government. The copper bulls, on the other hand, argue that demand is holding up well. Volumes at most companies are still up year on year; even in Europe, Germany is still showing reasonable growth; and in the United States the copper rod market is expected to register 3% growth – that would be down from 6% last year, but it's still growth. As for China, the bulls expect 8% economic growth and say it is merely a matter of time before the Chinese return to the market and restock heavily. Minmetals stoked that fire somewhat last week with its C$1.3-billion bid for Anvil Mining (T.AVM), a copper company.

In addition to all of those factors and arguments, the scrap market plays a role. The "urban mine" of recycled metals accounts for roughly one-third of global supply, but as prices fall scrap flows slow down significantly. That tightens the market even if demand also weakens. Many scrap dealers are holding on to their copper until prices recover; they did the same in 2008-'09, helping to push prices up.

So commodity prices are complicated and difficult to forecast at the best of times, which is not exactly how we would describe things at present. Yes, that's our lead-in to saying that predicting where prices are going from here is a challenge, to say the least.

Again, let's use copper as an example. Copper price forecasts now range from below US$6,000 per tonne (from the head of the copper department at Minmetals) all the way through to $10,075 (from Barclays Capital). Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, and Standard Bank are closely aligned in their outlooks, all expecting copper to sit just under $9,000 per tonne through 2012.

Certainly, the fundamentals of the copper market remain very tight. Based on current demand predictions, the International Copper Study Group expects to see a deficit of 250,000 tonnes in the global refined copper market in 2012, before moving closer to balance in 2013. To put 250,000 tonnes into context, global demand for refined copper products in 2010 averaged 19.4 million tonnes. And it is important to remember that current and forecast copper prices all sit comfortably above the break-even point for producers. The marginal cost to produce a tonne of copper averages between $4,000-US$5,000, creating a solid floor for spot prices.

But as one Credit Agricole analyst pointed out, "the fundamentals just won't matter in a financial panic." We've already seen some of that irrational movement: Copper's lowest point this week, of $6,635 per tonne, represented a 33% decrease over just two months. The metal boasted a spot price just below $10,000 at the start of August.

Really, commodity prices from here will depend on whether Greece defaults in an orderly, supported manner or goes down in an uncontrolled inferno, torching Europe's books for years. Both are still options. A planned default has its downsides – as German Chancellor Angela Merkel puts it, "If we tell a country 'We cancel half of your debt,' that's a great deal. Then the next guy will immediately show up and say he wants the same." Nevertheless, the only way Greece can survive its suffocating debt levels is through some kind of default, and if the European Union can come up with a default management plan, then the other countries of the Union could be protected from the worst of the fallout.

An unplanned, "oh-my-God-how-did-this-happen?!" style Greek default, on the other hand, could decimate numerous European banks and in doing so create exactly the same maelstrom that gave birth to the 2008 recession in America.

Despite some bearish indicators and a lot of nervous investors, a recession is not necessarily in our future. Goldman Sachs, the permabull of commodity price forecasters, remained committed to its prediction that commodities will continue to outperform. While reducing its oil and copper forecasts for 2012, the bank reiterated an "overweight" recommendation on commodities over the next 12 months, explaining that the turmoil in Europe will take away "some of the upside" to commodity prices, but will not reverse prospects.

"With recent GDP revisions by our economists falling hardest on Europe but with emerging market growth expectations still relatively solid, we continue to believe that demand growth in 2012 will be sufficient to tighten major commodity markets," lead analyst Jeffrey Currie wrote. The group sees potential for commodity prices to climb as much as 20% over the next year. Goldman did reduce its forecasts for oil and gas: The bank now expects Brent crude to average US$120 per barrel over 2012, down from an earlier prediction of $130, and expects copper to trade near $9,500 per ton, down from $11,000.

Barclays Capital added its voice to the chorus that is trying to remind frantic investors that a recession is not guaranteed, agreeing with Goldman that emerging markets could still save the world from a significant recession while also limiting further commodity price slides.

Many people are still hopeful that that chorus is singing the truth: These days any and every sign that we can avoid a recession sparks a bull market day. On October 5, the day after copper, oil, and silver all hit multimonth lows, commodity prices across the board gained ground after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the central bank would take further measures to prevent a recession if necessary. Bernanke said the Fed could ease monetary conditions further, following the launch of Operation Twist in September.

We think it is likely that the commodities which fell in September and early October were following the example set by oil in early August. Crude prices were too high, having failed to fall in response to increased stability in Libya and weakening demand. So they corrected: Brent crude fell about 8%, while WTI crude lost roughly 14% in late July and early August. Since then crude prices have been fairly stable; they dropped somewhat while other commodities were flailing in September, but not dramatically.

So perhaps the metals realized they were overvalued, like oil had been given the global economic climate, and corrected. If they are following oil's footsteps, things should remain relatively stable from here. But, as mentioned, that would require an orderly Greek default. And given that the Greek debt "crisis" has now been going on for two whole years and Europe's leaders have continued to respond with solutions that are too little, too late, a significantly proactive step such as planning for Greece's default may be too much to ask. And in the case of a frantic and disorganized default, commodity prices could easily drop farther.

[When markets get uncertain, having a solid investment strategy in mind can make an enormous difference… in peace of mind as well as profit potential. With all evaluations based on Doug Casey's 8 Ps of resource investing and including both entry and exit advice, Casey Energy Report provides a time-tested, winning strategy. Start your subscription today.]


Gold ETFs: Don't Panic!

By Alena Mikhan and Andrey Dashkov

The recent correction in gold is often compared to what took place in late 2008. It remains to be seen how similar these two periods will turn out to be, but while we're thinking along these lines, we thought we'd have a look at the data to see what impact the 2008 crash had on the exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and what to expect from the current slump.

Gold-backed ETFs are a new factor in our market sector. They only started operating in 2004 and quickly became very popular, as they provide exposure to the gold bullion market via convenient paper instruments that can be traded electronically. This has caused some observers to fear that ETF liquidation will cause even greater negative volatility when gold corrects.

Indeed, by Q2 2011, gold ETFs had accumulated about 80 million troy ounces of the yellow metal. In 2010, gold bullion ETFs accounted for one-third of total investor gold demand.

As gold ETFs provide exposure to physical bullion, the volume of ETF holdings can show investors' attitudes toward the metal's investment appeal. To see how that changed in 20


Gold Traders Most Bullish Since July After Plunge

Posted: 15 Oct 2011 02:16 AM PDT

¤ Yesterday in Gold and Silver I wouldn't read much into Friday's trading. Yes, it appeared that...once again...every rally got sold off in London and New York, but volume was also very light, around 92,000 contracts net...so it's not hard to push the market around when volume is this tiny. However, gold did close up $13.20 on the day at $1,679.80 spot, so we shan't complain too loudly. The silver price chart is more interesting. We had that little price dip on virtually zero volume just before 9:00 a.m. Hong Kong time...followed by a rally into the London open that began around 1:30 p.m. Hong Kong time. There was a slight dip into the London silver fix at noon local time, and the subsequent rally got hit about ten minutes after Comex trading began in New York. Then, about 10:10 a.m. Eastern time, a seller showed up and sold the silver price down to below the Thursday closing price. But after that seller disappeared, the price recovered somewhat, closing the Fri...


Real Estate can be a Recession breaker

Posted: 14 Oct 2011 09:11 PM PDT





Most economists believe that the recession is caused by insufficient demand in economy. Some of the major countries like the United States and United Kingdom are facing these problems, which are the main areas where people from different countries of the world live for high-paying jobs. Taking into account that it was in real estate, which started the ball rolling towards a financial disaster in the first place; it is quite ironic that it is in real estate that investors really have the opportunity to benefit from the economic downturn. Thousands of families have lost their homes. Extreme precautions are taken to the government and financial institutions to stop the epidemic, but are they enough?

You may already be experiencing a domino effect in your own business. This is not surprising that many business owners and managers have reported that companies have slowed down. Is there an area that will not be affected, if you are unemployed and business is worse than last year? With the current economic crisis many people are probably wondering if this recession will end, what caused this to happen and will it occur again. The credit crisis and the Depression of 2007 played a negative role in the U.S. housing market. The housing market is still in the process of recovery from the recession.

The U.S. financial crisis has caused a disruptive effect on the housing market. One might think that the recession would slowdown price appreciation, even in high-end real estate markets such as Aspen and Snowmass. Due to economic problems, many owners are faced with rising costs of living and tax burdens even as income levels continue to fall. Real estate is one of the assets whose value is declining in the face of an infinite flood of foreclosures and bankruptcies, and when the recession is over it is REALTY whose value is guaranteed to go up.

Everyone has been affected by the recession in real estate. Even if you do not lose your home, you have been affected by the chain reaction that began with the downturn in real estate. It is crucial for business owners and leaders to take concrete steps in these moments. Look at the positive side, the economic slowdown provided some interesting perspectives. United States face economic challenges, and could affect other states. Despite the U.S. markets that are not declared a state of recession, it is always wise to be wary. The government's offer to extend the $ 8,000 credit for first home buyers tax in mid-2010 and to expand the program to include the $ 6500 credit for non-time buyers will attract more domestic customers on the market.

Whether you're a small business owner with real estate, or an owner of a mortgage in trouble, it is crucial to take stock of your existing debt burden. Take a closer look at your own expense to see where you might be able to save on living expenses. I will invite you to put at least some long-term thinking. If we are to survive the U.S. recession, we must make prudent investments. Rather than going to several stocks or shares, it is better to be safe away with investments in real estate.

It's old news that the economic power continues to grow in oil-exporting countries that we send our dollars to. What could be the new news is that the long-awaited global production peak occurred in 2011 and 2012, well ahead of most forecasts. Recession proof business is increasingly likely to survive a severe recession, and if they are smart and do your research, not only can they survive but can actually thrive in recession and economic collapse that we are seeing in the U.S.

Reports say that people are mentally depressed due to the recession; we must ensure that all is well and all we have to do is wait a while until there's growth the economy. More Here...


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Gold Stocks Vastly Outperform Gold On The Week – Will The Trend Continue?

Posted: 14 Oct 2011 08:08 PM PDT

For the week ending October 14, gold continued to rally, gaining $26 on the week to $1,678.00 as measured by the closing London PM Fix Price. Gold stocks, by comparison,  dramatically outperformed the gain in bullion by almost fourfold.  In order to get a broad based assessment of relative performance, gold was compared to the [...]


The Shovel and Hole Maneuver For Hiding Gold, Guns and Other Assets

Posted: 14 Oct 2011 06:00 PM PDT

Shtfplan


No comments:

Post a Comment