A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Gold World News Flash

Gold World News Flash


The November 24, 2010 edition of Casey's Daily Dispatch, now available

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 08:20 PM PST

The Trial of Gold, Revisited


Riding the Second Gold Bubble

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 07:21 PM PST

UltraLong submits:
No matter which gold price diagram you look, the price of gold seems to be going upwards. As we rise above old all time highs, is it just a huge bubble or is the price justified?

110 years of gold price history

I wanted to look further than the customary 10 year charts available. Let's start by 110 years of gold price history:
Click to enlarge
The price of gold in dollar terms was pretty flat until 1934, when the dollar was devalued against gold by 69%. In the previous year Franklin D. Roosevelt declared gold ownership illegal and U.S citizens were required to sell all their gold to the Federal Reserve at the official exchange rate $20.67 an ounce. Gold ownership in USA was illegal until 1975.
After the Second World War, a system similar to a Gold Standard

Complete Story »


Monetizing Silver: Instant Prosperity

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 06:16 PM PST

BullionBullsCanada


Inflation-Related Thoughts

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 06:09 PM PST

"Don't fight the Fed" is an adage that's always worth remembering; however, this adage shouldn't be applied to all of the Fed's endeavours because the Fed is powerful in some areas and impotent in others. For example, the Fed can ALWAYS depreciate the US dollar -- that is, it can always cause dollar-denominated prices to rise -- if it chooses to do so, but it can't create real economic growth or sustainable employment (despite the fact that achieving "full employment" is part of the Fed's official mandate). Furthermore, although the Fed can always bring about a rise in prices by inflating the currency supply, it can't control which prices rise the most in response to its monetary inflation. In fact, the price-related effects of the Fed's inflation will often be the opposite of what the Fed intends.


Asian Metals Market Update

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 06:00 PM PST

Yesterdays fall of gold, silver, and crude oil was just a technical correction which if it continues only till Wednesday will result in a short term bear phase. Copper had a technical breakdown over fears that higher crude oil prices will slow global growth. Reports that US could use its strategic crude oil reserves to prevent gasoline prices from rising will be bearish for crude oil in the short term.


Gold 1,500? The World Is Changing!

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 05:50 PM PST

Gold Letter


Cheap Money, Speculation and Hoarding

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 05:48 PM PST

Bullion Vault


Check this our If You Think The Silver Spike Has Been Impressive

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 05:18 PM PST

Business insider


Richard Russell - Gold to $6,000 as Media Ridicules

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 05:00 PM PST

King world News


Guest Post: Short Squeeze! Here Comes 50-dollar Silver

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 04:07 PM PST

Smart Money Europe – http://www.smartmoney.eu
Short squeeze! Here comes 50-dollar-Silver
Silver is blasting through all barriers, topping $36.5 this morning! The white bullion market is tight, and the short squeeze in the futures market is exerting a constant upward pressure on the price. If current trends persist, the all-time high of $49.45/ounce will be reached in the near future.
Silver is performing exceptionally, outstripping a vast array of commodities and stocks. Even unrest in the Middle East has not stopped the price increasing, whereas during similar circumstances in the past, silver would have taken some serious blows.
As far as silver is concerned, we are living in exceptional times. Supply shortages have existed since the Fifties, but this deficit was traditionally eliminated with the (once strategic) reserves of central banks and other financial institutions, who wanted to get rid of their silver due to its lack of monetary use. Consequently, bank supplies have fallen rapidly. Today, the shortage on the silver market is mainly supplemented by recycling used silver, aka 'scrap'.
Nick Laird of ShareLynx, who supplied the chart below, gave the following explanation in a recent MoneyWeek interview: "Since 1950, the demand for silver increased up to 925,000 tonnes, while the production only amounted to 570,000 tonnes. This equals a silver production deficit of 16 years!"


Gold Seeker Closing Report: Gold and Silver Rise To New Highs Again

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 04:00 PM PST

Gold climbed as much as $16.60 to a new all-time high of $1444.50 by a little after 8AM EST before it fell back to unchanged at $1427.90 by about noon, but it then bounced back higher in afternoon trade and ended with a gain of 0.43%. Silver climbed to a new 31-year high of $36.732 before it also fell back off in New York, but it still ended with a gain of 1.76%.


This past week in gold - March 07, 2011

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 03:49 PM PST

Jack Chan JACK CHAN's Simply Profits. Precision sector timing for gold, energy, and technology. Posted Mar 7, 2011 GLD – on buy signal. *** SLV – on buy signal. *** GDX – on buy signal. *** XGD.TO – on buy signal. Summary Long term – on major buy signal. Short term – on buy signals. We increased our exposure to the sector by adding to our core positions upon recent new buy signals and set ups. We also have stops at breakeven on our trading positions to remove risk. ### Disclosure We do not offer predictions or forecasts for the markets. What you see here is our simple trading model which provides us the signals and set ups to be either long, short, or in cash at any given time. Entry points and stops are provided in real time to subscribers, therefore, this update may no...


Best Article on Silver in Ten Years!

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 03:45 PM PST

(Not written by me!) Silver Stock Report by Jason Hommel, March 7th, 2011 This is probably the best article on silver (not written by me) in the last ten years. The Silver Bullet And The Silver Shield By Silver Shield, on February 25th, 2011 The Ultimate FREE Silver Investors Guide. http://dont-tread-on.me/the-silver-bullet-and-the-silver-shield This article covers so much, so well. I have almost no arguments with the author, and that's really saying something. I linked to this article once already, when I had scanned it, but after having read it, I can say you MUST READ THIS! The best argument for silver is that when you buy real silver, you own real wealth, with allodial title. Unlike your car, your home, or your bank account, or your brokerage. All the other stuff can be encumbered easily. Your car is registered annualy for a fee. On your home, you pay property ta...


No Silver? No Problem: US Mint Would Like To Know If You Will Accept Brass, Steel, Iron Or Tungsten Coins Instead

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 02:48 PM PST


Wonder why the US mint has not sold a single ounce of silver so far in March? Here is a clue:

United States Mint Seeks Public Comment on Factors to be Considered in Research and Evaluation of Potential New Metallic Coinage Materials

WASHINGTON - The United States Mint today announced that it is requesting public comment from all interested persons on factors to be considered in conducting research for alternative metallic coinage materials for the production of all circulating coins.

These factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of new metallic coinage materials on the current suppliers of coinage materials; the acceptability of new metallic coinage materials, including physical, chemical, metallurgical and technical characteristics; metallic material, fabrication, minting, and distribution costs; metallic material availability and sources of raw metals; coinability; durability; sorting, handling, packaging and vending machines; appearance; risks to the environment and public safety; resistance to counterfeiting; commercial and public acceptance; and any other factors considered to be appropriate and in the public interest.

The United States Mint is not soliciting suggestions or recommendations on specific metallic coinage materials, and any such suggestions or recommendations will not be considered at this time.  The United States Mint seeks public comment only on the factors to be considered in the research and evaluation of potential new metallic coinage materials.

The recently enacted Coin Modernization, Oversight, and Continuity Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-302) gives the United States Mint research and development authority to conduct studies for alternative metallic coinage materials.  Additionally, the new law requires the United States Mint to consider certain factors in the conduct of research, development, and solicitation of input or work in conjunction with Federal and nonfederal entities, including factors that the public believes the United States Mint should consider to be appropriate and in the public interest.

Comments must be submitted on or before April 4, 2011.  Interested parties may submit written comments by any of the following methods:

E-mail: coinmaterials@usmint.treas.gov
Fax: (202) 756-6500
Mail: New Coin Materials Comments
Mail Stop:  Manufacturing 6 North
United States Mint
801 Ninth Street, N.W.
Washington D.C.  20220
Hand Delivery/Courier:  Same as mail address.

For further information, contact:  Jean Gentry, Deputy Chief Counsel, United States Mint at (202) 354-7359 (not a toll-free call).

h/t Alexander Gloy


4 Hour Silver Chart - update 9:30 PM Central Time

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 02:40 PM PST

...


Oil’s March Madness a Boost for Refiners

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 02:17 PM PST

March Madness is still a few weeks away for college basketball fans but the madness of March is in full swing for the oil sector. Turmoil in the Middle East sent oil prices up more than 6 percent last week. We also happen to be entering a time of year that has historically been good for energy prices and energy equities in recent decades.

Going back nearly 30 years, March has been the best month for crude oil. By the end of the month, the price of oil is nearly 4 percent higher on average than the closing price on the last trading day of February.

One reason for this increase relates to the demand pull created by refiners ramping up in advance of the summer driving season. You can see in the above chart that crude prices generally spike in March then continue at a lesser pace through the early summer before picking up again in the late summer. There is typically a big decline from September to October and weak price performance through year end.

This year, oil prices jumped the gun on the seasonal rise because of the unrest in Libya and fears that it may spread to key producers such as Iran, Algeria, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia. Crude oil prices reached $104 per barrel today and we expect this near-term volatility to continue as the geopolitical situation works itself out.

Short-term volatility aside, oil market supply/demand fundamentals were tightening before the turmoil in the Middle East began and we think historically high oil prices are here for the long-term. On Tuesday, the International Energy Agency's chief economist Fatih Birol supported this opinion when he indicated that "the age of cheap oil is over."

PIRA, an oil industry analyst, is forecasting West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil prices will hover around $104 per barrel in 2011 based on tighter oil supply/demand fundamentals, strong medium-term fundamentals and increased financial investment. The firm expects oil demand to grow by 1.6 million barrels per day in 2011 as global GDP growth averages 4.3 percent. Meanwhile, OPEC's crude output is only expected to increase by 960,000 barrels per day.

Refiners are one of the energy sub-sectors that could benefit the most from higher oil prices. Historically March marks the end of a five-month stretch in which monthly crack spreads (value of refined products minus the prices of the crude oil feedstock) tends to increase. Spreads are generally 4 percent wider in March than February.

This year, some refiners are getting an added bonus because of the significant price difference between WTI and Brent crude oil. Currently, Brent is trading about $15 a barrel higher than WTI, which means that some refiners are buying their oil $15 below global prices. This adds to the profitability of each barrel.

The discount may remain wide for the time being because crude oil supplies from Canada and the mid-continental region of the U.S. have risen faster than demand. These supplies travel to storage facilities at the delivery hub in Cushing, Oklahoma, which makes it difficult to be exported overseas. This creates a supply glut unique to the region.

This is a very positive development for a sub-group that has struggled over the past few years. You can see from the chart that refiners have lagged the rest of the oil and gas sector over the past three years. While the S&P Energy Index is returning to peak 2008 price levels, the S&P Oil and Gas Refining and Marketing Index is barely halfway back.

During this madness of March, the increased profitability gives refiners some catch-up potential with the rest of the energy sector. For these reasons, refiners remain an area of focus for the Global Resources Fund (PSPFX).

Regards,

Frank Holmes,
for The Daily Reckoning

P.S. For more updates on global investing from me and the U.S. Global Investors team, visit my investment blog, Frank Talk.

Oil's March Madness a Boost for Refiners originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning has published articles on the impact of quantitative easing, bakken oil, and hyperinflation.


Ted Kaufman's Friday Hearing Explains Everything That Is Broken With The US Financial System

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 02:10 PM PST


On Friday, free and efficient market champion Ted Kaufman, previously known for his stern crusade to rid the world of the HFT scourge, and all other market irregularities which unfortunately will stay with us until the next major market crash (and until the disbanding of the SEC following the terminal realization of its corrupt and utter worthlessness), held a hearing on the impact of the TARP on financial stability, no longer in his former position as a senator, but as Chairman of the Congressional TARP oversight panel. Witness included Simon Johnson, Joseph Stiglitz, Allan Meltzer, William Nelson (Deputy Director of Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve), Damon Silvers (AFL-CIO Associate General Counsel), and others. In typical Kaufman fashion, this no-nonsense hearing was one of the most informative and expository of all Wall Street evils to ever take place on the Hill. Which of course is why it received almost no coverage in the media. Below we present a full transcript of the entire hearing, together with select highlights. The insights proffered by the panelists and the witnesses, while nothing new to those who have carefully followed the generational theft that has been occurring for two and a half years in plain view of everyone and shows no signs of stopping, are truly a must read for virtually every citizen of America and the world: this transcript explains in great detail what absolute crime is, and why it will likely forever go unpunished.

Key highlights from the transcript:

In a recent paper, professors in Dallas and a co-author estimated that the CPP program, along with the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, increased the value of banks participating in these two programs by approximately $130 billion, of which 40 billion represented a direct taxpayer subsidy to banks.
 
On the other hand, the political deals required to get TARP passed with an estimated 150 billion in largely unjustified and unjustifiable tax breaks, do not speak well for our democracy.

 


I estimated that the capital purchase program increased the value of banks debt by $120 billion at a cost of $32 billion for the taxpayers. Though in spite of the enormous value created by the government intervention, taxpayers ended up with a large loss.
 
TARP was the largest welfare program for corporations and their investors ever created in the history of humankind.
 
And some of the crumbs (ph) have been donated to the Auto Workers Unions doesn't make it any better. It makes it worse. It shows that this redistribution was no accident. It was a premeditated pillage of defenseless taxpayers by powerful lobbyists. TARP is not just a triumph of Wall Street over Main Street, it is the triumph of K- Street over the rest of America.

 

 


 

There are exactly the issues you discussed with the previous panel in terms of additional losses coming through from major lawsuits and various kinds of put backs and so on. We don't know how much capital they're going to need to weather the next stage of the global cycle. And the Federal Reserve has not yet determined that, so why would you allow them to pay out any of this capital as dividends?
 
This is just reducing their equity and allowing them tohave more leverage in their business. The bankers, again,  want it, because they get paid on a return on equity basis. This is just letting them leverage up, and there's a put option. We write the put option. We bear the cost of that.
 
You're increasing the put option, which is not scored in anyone's budget, by allowing them to pay these dividends. It's unconscionable. It's irresponsible. And the Federal Reserve should back off from allowing this increase in dividends, which is apparently where they are currently headed.
 
 



STIGLITZ: In these ultimate objectives, TARP has been a dismal failure. Four years after the bursting of the real estate bubble and three years after the onset of recession, unemployment remains unacceptably high, foreclosures continue almost unabated, and our economy is running far below its potential, a waste of resources (inaudible) trillions of dollars.
 
Lending, especially to small- and medium-size enterprises is still constrained. While the big banks were saved, large numbers of the smaller community and regional banks that are responsible for much of the lending to SMEs are in trouble. The mortgage market is still on life support.
 
So TARP has not just failed in its explicit objectives. I believe the way the program was managed has in fact contributed to the economy's problems. The normal laws of capitalism where investors must bear responsibility for their decisions were abrogated. A system that socializes losses and privatizes gains is neither fair nor efficient.
 
TARP has led to a banking system that is even less competitive, where the problem of too-big-to-fail institutions is even worse.
 
There were six critical failings of TARP. First, it did not demand anything in return for the provision of funds. It neither restrained the unconscionable bonuses or payouts and dividends. It put no demands that they lend the money that they were given to them. Didn't even restrain their predatory and speculative practices.
 
Secondly, in giving money to the banks, they should have demanded appropriate compensation for the risk borne. It is not good enough to say that we will repay, or we will be repaid, or we will be almost repaid. If we had demanded arms-length terms, terms such as those that Warren Buffet got when he provided funds to Goldman-Sachs, our national debt would be lower and our capacity to deal with the problems ahead would be stronger. The fairness of the terms is to be judged ex ante -- not ex post -- taking into account the risks at the time.
 
Thirdly, there was a lack of transparency. Fourthly, there was a lack of concern for what kind of financial sector should emerge after the financial crisis. There was no vision of what a financial sector should do, and not surprisingly, what has emerged has not been serving the economy well.
 
Fifthly, from the very beginning, TARP was based on a false premise: that the real estate markets were temporarily depressed. The reality was that there had been an enormous bubble, for which the financial sector was largely responsible. It was inevitable that the breaking of that bubble, especially given the kinds of mortgages that had been issued, would have enormous consequences that had to be dealt with. Many of the false starts, both in asset recovery and homeowner programs, have been the result of building on that false premise.
 
Particularly flawed was the PPIP, a joint public-private program designed to have the government bear a disproportionate share of the losses. The private sector, while putting up minimal money, would receive a disproportionate share of the gains. It was sold as helping the market reprice. But the prices that would emerge would be prices of options, not of underlying assets. The standard wisdom in such a situation is summarized in a single word:
"restructure."
 
But TARP, combined with accounting rules changes, made things worse.
 
The sixth critical failure of TARP was that some of the money went to restructure securitization under the TALF program, without an understanding of the deeper reasons for the failure of mortgage securitization.
 
These attempts to revive the market have failed, and to me this is not a surprise.
 
Banks won't focus on lending if they can continue to make more money by publicly underwritten (ph) specification and trading or by exploiting market power in the credit and debit card markets.
 
Moreover, too-big-to-fail institutions, whether they be mortgage companies, insurance houses or commercial investment banks, pose an ongoing risk to our economy and the solidness of government finances.
 
I want to conclude with two more general comments. First, we should not forget the process by which TARP and this oversight panel was created. That political process does not represent one of the country's finest moments.
 
At first, a short three-page bill was presented, giving enormous discretion to the Secretary of the Treasury and without congressional oversight and judicial review.
 
Given the lack of transparency and potential abuses to which I have already referred, which occurred even with full knowledge that there was to be oversight, one could only imagine what might have occurred had the original bill been passed.
 
Fortunately, Congress decided that such a delegation of responsibility was incompatible with democratic processes.
 
On the other hand, the political deals required to get TARP passed with an estimated 150 billion in largely unjustified and unjustifiable tax breaks, do not speak well for our democracy.
 
When we think of the cost of TARP, surely the price tag associated with those tax breaks should be included in the tally.
 
Nor should we underestimate the damage that the correct perception that those who were responsible for creating the crisis were the recipients of the government's munificence.
 
And the lack of transparency that permeated this and other government rescue efforts has only reinforced public perceptions that something untoward has occurred.
 
For these and the other failings of TARP, our economy and our society have paid and will continue to pay a very high price.
 

 

 

 
The unlimited bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy Treasury in the purchase of $1.25 trillion of GSE guaranteed mortgage-backed securities in the secondary market by the Federal Reserve under its quantitative -- first quantitative easing program no doubt materially benefited the TARP recipients and other financial institutions. These institutions are not required, however, to share the costs incurred in the bailout of the GSEs.
 
In effect, the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac permitted the TARP recipients to monetize their GSE guaranteed MBS at prices above what they would have received without the GSE guarantees and use the proceeds to repay their obligations outstanding under the TARP, thereby arguably shifting a greater portion of the TARP from the TARP recipients themselves to the taxpayers. Costs such as this should be thoughtfully considered when evaluating the TARP.
 
2010 report on the AIG bailout, and I quote, "The government's actions in rescuing AIG continued to have a poisonous effect on the marketplace. By providing a complete rescue that called for no shared sacrifice among AIG's creditors, the Federal Reserve and Treasury fundamentally changed the relationship between the government and the country's most sophisticated financial players.
 
The AIG rescue demonstrated that Treasury and the Federal Reserve would commit taxpayers to pay any price and bear any burden to prevent the collapse of America's largest financial institutions and to assure repayment to the creditors doing business with them. So long as this remains, the worst effects of AIG's rescue on the marketplace will linger.
 
Treasury's rescue suggested that any sufficiently large American corporation, even if not a bank, may be considered too big to fail, creating a risk that moral hazard will infect the economy far beyond the financial system.
 
Many senior officers of these institutions retained their lucrative employment and although they generally suffered many full dilution (ph), the shareholders and most TARP recipients were not wiped out
 
Main Street quickly realized that the TARP was heavily tilted in favor of Wall Street, while Main Street was stuck with dramatic rates of unemployment, neighborhoods decimated by foreclosure, banks that refused to lend and the general sense that the residents were left on their own.
 
Two, I believe and there is overwhelming evidence to support my position in our February 2009 report that at the time these initial TARP investments were made, the public did not receive anything like full value for our money.
 
Three, the Paulson Treasury Department was not truthful with the public when it said that the capital purchase program funds were only going to help the institutions and the Geithner Treasury Department has compounded this lack of candor be refusing to admit in testimony before this panel that Citigroup and Bank of America were on the verge of collapse when they received additional TARP funds in November 2008 and January 2009 respectively.
 
Four, the failure to replace bank management, to do a rigorous evaluation of the state of bank assets and to restructure bank balance sheets accordingly has left the United States with weak major banks and a damaged sense of trust between the American public and our nation's elected
leaders.
 
Foreclosure prevention has been subordinated to the needs of the banks. The truth is that continued mass foreclosures of homeowners are a powerful source of systemic risk and downward pressure on our economy and on jobs. ... the American people would judge TARP based not on the wealth of bankers, but on
the health of our communities.
 
likely consequence of failing to restructure the major banks.
 
encouraging firms to grow until they became too big to fail, thereby increasing the number and size of systemically risky firms in the economy. And in turn, increasing the amount of money needed to stem the financial crisis.
 
Unfortunately at least so far it does not appear that we have taken the necessary steps to end too big to fail. 
Then the government needs to start charging marked-based fees to these firms for insurance provided to them through  substantially higher reserve requirements, which has been advocated by Professor Meltzer among others by requiring firms to hold additional alternative reserves against their systemically risky holdings, as has been proposed by professors in Dallas by charging firms for the bailout insurance along the lines proposed by the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis or through some alternative mechanism which forces these firms to pay the cost of the insurance that is currently being paid for by the American taxpayers.
 
Only by ending the taxpayer funded, survival guarantee for large firms, both domestic and foreign, will we return basic market discipline to Wall Street and ensure that large financial firms face the same competitive pressures faced by firms operating on Main Street?
 
There is a widespread perception -- not a perception; I think it's personally a reality -- that Main Street did a lot worse than Wall Street on this one.
 
Are there some things that the TARP, that Treasury could have done at the beginning of this program to kind of more better balance between what was going to Main Street, the amount that would accrue to Main Street as opposed to Wall Street?
 
Professor Stiglitz's testimony, he says, "Resolution authority has made little difference, because few believe that the government will ever use the authority at its disposal with these too big to fail banks."
 
But once the markets had stabilized in the last quarter of 2008, begun to stabilize more in 2009, and certain institutions came back and said, "You know, by the way, we're still insolvent. We're still insolvent by the tune of many billions of dollars," at that point there were rules on the books of the FDIC to take down these institutions, and they were not.
 
So it really makes me question that now you have new rules for new institutions. When it comes right down to it, will -- will this happen or will simply more checks be written? And as more checks are written, more moral hazard will be created.
 
The Federal Reserve purchased a trillion-plus dollars of mortgage-backed securities, government backed mortgage-backed securities, which would not have been purchased at fair market value, if Fannie and Freddie had been permitted to fail.
 
So the bailout of Fannie and Freddie seems to me to have a direct correlation to the health of financial institutions and their ability to pay back the funds.
 
So I don't know whether you saw there was a column in Wednesday's New York Times alleging that banks supplied the measures that were used in the latest round of stress tests, ensuring that they would look good and rendering the tests rather meaningless. I think part of this comes from the -- the fact that these latest rounds of stress tests, the results have been kept somewhat private and were not as public as the first time around.
 
What are the benefits and costs from making these results public and do you have any idea why Fed -- the Fed has sent -- tended to think that the benefits were less than the costs in making the results public?
 
But few mention that very little of the money has actually been spent. And that lack of spending frustrates those of us who believe that effective government investment into the housing market is essential for further financial stability and economic recovery. But with only $1 billion spent on the HAMP so far as estimated by the CBO and nearly 600,000 mortgages permanently modified, it's difficult to conclude that HAMP has been a waste of money.
 
Even just a back of the envelope estimate, that's around $2,000 per permanent mod and we know that there are certainly other more complicating factors, re-default rates and servicer incentives and the role that the GSE's have played, but could you comment from a cost- benefit analysis?
 
KAUFMAN: Is there any concern that -- widespread belief that there still are banks too big to fail. The market seems to indicate by the spreads that they give to the larger banks that they're too big to fail. That people all over the world are trying to figure out -- I know there's a new study going to come out on resolution authority across borders, which has not been dealt with in Dodd-Frank and would be an incredible problem.
 
KAUFMAN: One of the frustrations I think that people -- not just people, everyone has such as me, everyone and that is the fact that you know we went in, we helped out the banks, we helped out the corporations and then the jobs just didn't come. The investment didn't come. The banks held onto the money. They're still not investing the money. The corporations didn't invest the money.
 
Admittedly the big banks were given many enormous gifts, and he uses the term gifts, of which TARP was only one. The United States government provided money to the biggest of the banks in their times of need in generous amounts and on generous terms, but have been forcing ordinary Americans to fend for themselves.
 
"TARP was the largest welfare program for corporations of its -- and their investors ever created in the history of humankind.
 
"That some of the crumbs (ph) have been donated to a lot of (ph) workers does not make it any better. It makes it worse. It shows that its redistribution was no accident."It was premeditated pillage of defenseless taxpayers by powerful lobbyists."
 
Do you have a sense of the -- and whether the Federal Reserve's ultimate purchase of 1.2 trillion in residential mortgage-backed securities was, in addition to the other effects, a way of removing those troubled assets from banks' books and shifting them to the Fed's books?
 
The FDIC's TLGP was one of several extraordinary measures taken by the U.S. government in the fall of 2008 to address a crisis in the financial markets and bolster public confidence. The FDIC's TLGP helped to unlock the credit markets, calm market fears, and encourage lending during these unprecedented disruptions.
 
At its peak the FDIC guaranteed almost 350 billion of debt outstanding. As of December 31st, 2010, the total amount of remaining FDIC guaranteed debt was 267 billion. Of that amount 100 billion, or 37 percent, will mature in 2011, and the remaining 167 billion will mature in 2012.
 
Given that 267 billion in TLGP remains outstanding, it is important that financial institutions continue to replace government guaranteed debt with private funds.

 
Currently, we are working with the Federal Reserve to review the dividend plans at the large banking organizations. We believe that a comprehensive review of dividend and capital replacement plans across large firms is critical, since these payments were a large drain on cash reserves prior to the crisis, leaving financial institutions more vulnerable to the disruptions that followed.
 
This is why the dividend plan review and TLGP repayment plans are intertwined. The regulators should not approve dividend and capital repurchases, which involve significant cash outlays by financial firms, until we are all fully confident that these firms will have the financial resources under both normal and stress conditions to repay debt guaranteed by the FDIC.
 
Mr. Cave, can you talk a little bit about the plans of the - that you mentioned in your testimony - about plans for large banking organizations to increase dividends and how you think that works and why you think that works and what has to be done before that should go forward?
 
Right now, and again, the Federal Reserve is – is the lead agency responsible for administering the – the stress tests and the review of the dividend plans.
 
LAWLER: Servicers have some conflicts in some parts of the process. For example, if they hold a second lien on a property where they're also servicing the first lien, that's a conflict and that's certainly an issue.
 
MCWATTERS: Thank you. Following up on that, do these troubled assets, which are estimated at around $1 trillion as presently constituted, do they pose a systemic risk to the economy?
 
MCWATTERS: Okay. Am I putting words in your mouth in saying that it sounds like a no to me? I mean it sounds like a no answer. It's not that these troubled assets, $1 trillion on the books, do not pose a systemic risk today? Is that a fair statement or ...?
 
CAVE: I would, would need to get additional information to you on that.
&


The Next Bull Run in Precious Metals is Here

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 01:41 PM PST

The Next Bull Run in Precious Metals is Here

Gold has broken to new highs and now looks to be retesting forming resistance. If it bounces hard here then the next leg up for the precious metal has begun, as former resistance would now be support.

gpc 3-8-1

Having said that, the rising bearish wedge pattern in Gold remains in play. We bounced off the bottom trendline and now look to be on our way to the upper trendline. This indicates the target for this current rally is in the $1470-$1480 range. And if we break above the upper trendline… then it's "lift off" time.

gpc 3-8-2

Silver which has been leading Gold in the last six months seems to be indicating that this will be the case. Indeed, Silver broke out to new highs back in mid-February:

gpc 3-8-3

While Gold is only just breaking out to new highs now (2-3 weeks later):

gpc 3-8-4

A secondary reason for Silver outperformance is its pricing: at $36 per ounce, buying Silver is much more affordable than Gold which costs $1,400 per ounce. Consequently, Silver is a kind of "poor man's" inflation hedge and so is profiting from an influx of orders from those who are growing increasingly worried about inflation but cannot afford to buy an ounce of Gold.

Finally, Silver also has some catching up to do in general. Historically, the Gold: Silver ratio has fallen into the low 30s if not the 20s during precious metals bull markets. Today, this ratio stands at 39. So we could easily see Silver go to $50+ or even higher within the context of historic price movements.

gpc 3-8-5

However, the precious metals aren't the only assets that are staging dramatic rallies. Indeed, commodities across the board are exploding higher as the Fed's funny money kicks off an inflationary storm.

gpc 3-7-5

All of these assets, particularly Gold and Silver, will perform well in the coming months. However, their performance will pale compared to other, less well know inflation hedges.

Why?

Everyone knows that Gold and Silver are the most obvious inflation hedges out there. And to be blunt, anyone who invests in these two assets will likely do very well in the coming months as inflation erupts in the US.

However, to make truly ENORMOUS gains from inflation you need to find the investments that are off the radar… investments that the rest of the investment world hasn't discovered yet.

I'm talking about investments that own assets of TREMENDOUS value that are currently priced at absurdly low valuations: the sorts of assets that larger companies will pay obscene premiums to acquire.

I detail the three best investments I know that fit these criteria in my new Special Report the Inflationary Storm Pt 2 which I just released to the public last Wednesday.

Already two of these investments are up 5% and 13%. That's in just 10 days! I fully expect they'll ALL be in the triple figures within the next six months (the first three inflation picks I suggested are up 6%, 38%, and 49% in just two months).

And I'm only making 250 copies of this second report available to the public. Any more than that and we'll blow the lid off these investments too quickly.

As I write this, there are only a few copies left. And I fully expect we'll sell out shortly. So if you want to pick up a copy of the Inflationary Storm Pt 2 (including the names, symbols, and how to buy my three NEWEST extraordinary inflation hedges) you better move quickly.

To reserve a copy…

CLICK HERE NOW!!!

Good Investing!

Graham Summers


UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 01:28 PM PST

The recent rally in gold, oil, and commodities in general has been extremely powerful. Despite protestations to the contrary by our clueless Fed president, it's very clear what is driving this massive commodity inflation when you look at this next chart. That's right we are now seeing the unintended consequences of printing money.

Just as soon as the dollar started to collapse commodities began to surge. And if you think it's bad now wait till the dollar breaks below the November pivot. When that happens, and it will happen, it will signal that we now have a yearly cycle that has topped in only 4 weeks and has already moved below the last yearly cycle bottom. That my friends is an incredibly bearish sign. 

At that point the market will no longer be able to delude itself that everything is OK. At that point inflationary pressures will surge out of control. At that point Bernanke will understand the magnitude of his catastrophic blunder when he ran QE2. And at that point it will be too late to stop.

Actually this path was already determined when Ben opted for QE1 to abort the debt cleansing process that was underway in 08 and 09. Yes he bought us a little time but the ultimate cost is going to be much greater than anyone could have foreseen. It would have been much better if the depression was allowed to run it's course. We would be most of the way through the pain by now and ready to come out the other side into a golden age. Instead we have another decade or more of misery ahead of us. All because our leaders don't have the foresight to see the consequences of their actions.


Now on a more immediate note the dollar is due for a dead cat bounce anytime now. When it does it should force a brief correction in gold, oil and commodities in general.



This will be your last buying opportunity before the final parabolic move begins in earnest. Once the dollar breaks below that November low all hell should break lose in the currency markets forcing all commodities, especially gold and silver into what will likely be one of the most powerful rallies in history.


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Sun’s up in PR? & Politics as Usual?

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 12:58 PM PST


Good News In Puerto Rico!


S%P came out today with an upgrade for the 51st state. From BBB- to a flat BBB. S%P cited improved revenue for the upgrade. This is baloney.

The change from (-) to neutral is nothing. How does one measure this? PR was junk. It still is. S%P did (of course) have a caveat. We should probably ignore this, right?

Puerto Rico’s GO credit rating could be “negatively pressured” if the island fails — in the next two years — to take on its $17 billion unfunded pension liability.


Some facts on the PR puzzle:

-Tax revenue for 2011 is projected at $7.2b. This is down $800mm (10%) from 2007. So much for the S%P call.

-One dollar out every four spent comes from Washington.

-One dollar in every six goes to debt service. Debt service will be $4.4b in 2011

-The GNP to debt ratio is 93% (up from 58% in 2004).

The weather is great. The beaches are beautiful. The food is good and the drinks are better. The bonds, on the other hand, don’t get on my “buy” list.






Tough Talk From CBO


Doug Elmendorf, the boss over at the CBO, spoke this morning. I think he was trying to shake some political trees. He flat out said that cuts in entitlements were in our future. Strong talk. Some bits from the speech:

If current policies are continued, the gap between spending and revenues will remain very large even after we return to normal economic conditions.


In Washington “speak” Very Large is the polite way of saying Disaster.

Fiscal policy cannot be put on a sustainable path just by eliminating waste and inefficiency; the policy changes that are needed will significantly affect popular programs or people’s tax payments or both.

Popular Program AKA Social Security.

Doug concludes that what we are doing is unsustainable. His bottom line: We only have two choices. We deal with it now, or we kick the can a bit further. If we choose to wait this will be the result:

Increases the likelihood of a fiscal crisis during which investors would lose confidence in the government's ability to manage its budget and the government would lose its ability to borrow at affordable rates.


The number one reason given for delaying the cuts that must come?

Helps older generations by deferring the increases in taxes or the cuts in benefit payments they would face.


When Elmendorf says words like this what he is really means is, “We have to look at Social Security”.

Why do I bring this up? Because Mitch McConnell raised it on Face The Nation this past Sunday. More importantly, John Boehner put this issue on the table last Friday. (link)

Austan Goolsbee was on MSNBC Sunday. He took a different track on SS. He made it pretty clear that the Roosevelt promise of retirement for all would be kept. “Maybe some ‘tweaking’ but no changes.


This is about Presidential Politics. The Republicans have said they will talk about the hard topic of entitlements. The Democrats are going to say “no” to that. So nothing will be accomplished. But this will be a central issue in the next election.

It sure is swell to see the “Non-Partisan” CBO weigh in on this issue on such a “timely” basis. Especially after McConnell and Boehner teed it up so nicely. Of course Mr. Elmendorf is smart enough to know that there is no way that SS benefit cuts will happen as long as Obama and a Democratic Senate is around. So this is all talk for now. I wonder what Elmendorf got for the favor.



Terraco Gold

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 12:23 PM PST

TEN on AOTH Richard (Rick) Mills Ahead of the Herd As a general rule, the most successful man in life is the man who has the best information Terraco Gold Corp TSX.V - TEN is an aggressive junior exploration company with properties in Nevada and Idaho. The Almaden property, located in Idaho, has been drilled with 887 holes, and 60,000 meters of historical drilling and has a Measured and Indicated gold resource of 864,000 oz of gold and an inferred resource of 84,000 oz gold. This resource is likely open pittable and heap leachable. Almaden is similar to mines in northern Nevada which host bonanza‐grade gold in feeder zones below lower grade disseminated ores. High‐grade feeder system examples include; Midas (7.6M ounces), Mule Canyon, Buckhorn and Hollister A majority of the historic drilling has been only to a depth of 100 meters and the resource is still open along strike for several hundred meters and also at depth. Earlier metallurgical work done ...


Battered Public Pensions Doing Better?

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 12:20 PM PST


Via Pension Pulse.

Jeanette Neumann of the WSJ reports, Battered Public Pensions Do Better:

A rebounding stock market helped buoy state pension plans' assets in 2010. But the plans still have a long way to go to bridge a funding gap caused in large part by losses suffered during the financial crisis, according to a report expected to be released Monday.

 

Any upswing is good news for state pension plans, typically funded by contributions from public employers and workers and investment returns on assets held in the plans.

 

State pension systems had an estimated funding ratio of 69% for fiscal year 2010, ending June 30, up from 65% for fiscal year 2009, according to Wilshire Associates, a Santa Monica, Calif.-based investment-consulting firm. But pension plans remain well below the 95% estimated average funding ratio for 2007.

 

The ratio means that 126 state pension systems surveyed by Wilshire on average have 69% of the assets on hand compared to projections of what they will owe in pension payments to government workers over the long term. That figure is based on the market value of the assets.

 

"The trajectory is up, albeit it's up off a pretty low base," says Steven Foresti, managing director at Wilshire and an author of the report.

 

The so-called actuarial estimate, which most plans use and which spreads out investment gains and losses over longer periods, leads to a projection of 77% for 2010. That's down from 79% a year earlier and 87% in 2007.

 

For most of the pension plans, figures reflect funding through June. Since then, robust market returns have likely bolstered pension plans' assets, Mr. Foresti said.

 

Over the next decade, Wilshire projects public pension plans will have a median annual return on their assets of 6.5%. The pension plans included in the study have projected a median actuarial return of 8% over several decades, Wilshire says.

 

Public pension plans' asset allocation has shifted over the past decade, according to Wilshire.

 

In 2010, funds had 31.1% of their assets in U.S. stocks, down from 45% in 2000, while foreign equities have increased to 17.5% from 13% over the same time frame. Investments in so-called "alternative" assets classes, such as real estate, private equity, commodities and hedge funds have also increased.

 

Public pension funds' health has received heightened attention in recent months amid increased stress on states' finances and questions by some over the size of retiree pensions. Representatives of government workers have said gaps are due at least in part to employers' failures to make required contributions.

 

The Wilshire report comes as other data also point to signs of improvement in state and local finances.

 

State tax collections, for instance, increased 6.9% across 41 states that have reported their fourth-quarter revenue, the fastest rate in nearly five years, according to a February report by the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government at the State University of New York.

 

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke in a speech in New York last week said that if the economy continues to strengthen "states and localities may start to get a little breathing space," as tax collections rise with income and spending and the demand for support programs such as Medicaid, a federal-state partnership to provide health coverage for the poorest Americans, diminishes. But Mr. Bernanke and others also say that state and local governments face a tough slog ahead.

Wishire recently reported that the Master trusts rose nearly 6% in the fourth quarter, resulting in a median return of over 12% for calendar year 2010:

For the second year in a row, master trusts had a stellar year returning 12.72 percent in 2010 following an 18.29 percent return in 2009, as measured by the median Wilshire Trust Universe Comparison Service® (Wilshire TUCS ®), a cooperative effort between Wilshire Analytics, the investment technology unit of Wilshire Associates, and custodial organizations. Wilshire TUCS, the most widely accepted benchmark for the performance of institutional assets, includes approximately 900 plans representing $2.8 trillion in assets.

 

The Public, Taft-Hartley Defined Benefit and Endowment and Foundation plans were all top performers posting median returns in a tight range of 6.0, 5.98, and 5.95 percent, respectively, in the fourth quarter. For the year, it was the corporate Defined Benefit plans that came out on top with a median return of 13.19 percent while Public (12.94%), Taft-Hartley Defined Benefit (12.61%), and Endowments and Foundations (12.50%) all trailed behind.

 

The large plans are once again outperforming the smaller plans as demonstrated by the median Master Trust over One Billion return of 5.86 percent for the quarter and 13.11 percent for the year, while the Master Trusts less than One Billion returned 5.78 and 12.39 percent, respectively. Within the large plans, it was the Taft Hartley Defined Benefit plans that outperformed all others with 5.68 percent for the quarter and 13.71 percent for the year. This can be somewhat explained by their large exposure to equities at 63 percent, as represented by the median allocation to US and International Equity combined.

 

Drilling down to the asset class level, equity portfolios showed a large spread in median returns for both the fourth quarter and the year ending December 2010 with a strong size effect resulting in small cap significantly outperforming the mid and large cap styles. There was also a large style effect, according to the Wilshire TUCS medians, with growth managers dominating value managers in all capitalization ranges for both the quarter and the year. “Looking at the Small Cap Growth median returns of 16.78 and 28.42 percent for the quarter and the year, as compared with Large Cap Value portfolios which returned 10.28 and 14.69 percent for the same period, really illustrates these points”, said Hilarie C. Green, CFA, Managing Director, Wilshire Analytics.

 

Turning to the fixed income managers, the High Yield managers (3.09%) easily beat the other strategies with the Long Duration managers delivering the weakest performance (-4.39%) as the yield curve adjusted upwards during the quarter. On the other hand, for calendar year 2010, the Long Term duration managers outperformed all others (11.76%), except the High Yield managers which returned a median of 14.47 percent.

Strong returns in stocks and bonds bode well for public pension assets. The problem is that interest rates remain near historic low levels, so even if the funding gap is shrinking a little, it's still high and won't get better anytime soon. You would need a sharp rise in rates and continued strength in the stock market to see those funding deficits shrink substantially.

In her article, Lisa Lambert of Reuters notes the following:

Public pensions have recently sparked heated debates, from the halls of the U.S. Congress, where lawmakers have suggested allowing states to go bankrupt to undo pension promises, to the streets of Wisconsin's capital, where thousands of demonstrators are pitched in a battle over public employees' rights.

 

Stock market declines drove down the value of many retirement systems' funds recently, and many states pulled back on putting money into the funds as they faced their worst budget crises in decades.

 

The retirement systems have been caught short in paying for future retirees. Estimates of the shortfalls range from $800 billion to $3 trillion, depending on how much the systems' investments are expected to appreciate.

All this to say that US public pension funds are doing better but are by no means out of the woods. If you want to know what the future might have in store for many public sector workers, have a look at what going on in the UK where a review by former Labour Cabinet minister Lord Hutton is expected to recommend an end to "gold-plated" final salary schemes. He is set to say that workers should instead receive payouts linked to average salary over their careers.


Top Economists: Trust is Necessary for a Stable Economy ... But Trust Won't Be Restored Until We Prosecute Wall Street Fraud

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 11:59 AM PST


Washington’s Blog

Most policy makers still don't understand the urgent need to restore trust in our financial system, or the need to prosecute Wall Street executives for fraud and other criminal wrongdoing.

But top economists have been saying for well over a decade that trust is necessary for a stable economy, and that prosecuting the criminals Is necessary to restore trust.

Trust is Necessary for a Stable Economy

In his influential 1993 book Making Democracy Work, Robert Putnam showed how civic attitudes and trust could account for differences in the economic and government performance between northern and southern Italy.

Political economist Francis Fukiyama wrote a book called Trust in 1995, arguing that the most pervasive cultural characteristic influencing a nation's prosperity and ability to compete is the level of trust or cooperative behavior based upon shared norms. He stated that the United States, like Japan and Germany, has been a high-trust society historically but that this status has eroded in recent years.

In 1998, Paul Zak (Professor of Economics and Department Chair, as well as the founding Director of the Center for Neuroeconomics Studies at Claremont Graduate University, Professor of Neurology at Loma Linda University Medical Center, and a senior researcher at UCLA) and Stephen Knack (a Lead Economist in the World Bank's Research Department and Public Sector Governance Department) wrote a paper called Trust and Growth, arguing:

Adam Smith (1997 [1766]) observed notable differences across nations in the 'probity' and 'punctuality' of their populations. For example, the Dutch 'are the most faithful to their word.'John Stuart Mill wrote: 'There are countries in Europe . . . where the most serious impediment to conducting business concerns on a large scale, is the rarity of persons who are supposed fit to be trusted with the receipt and expenditure of large sums of money' (Mill, 1848, p. 132).

Enormous differences across countries in the propensity to trust others survive
today.

***
Trust is higher in 'fair' societies.

***

High trust societies produce more output than low trust societies. A fortiori, a sufficient amount of trust may be crucial to successful development. Douglass North (1990, p. 54) writes,
The inability of societies to develop effective, lowcost enforcement of contracts is the most important source of both historical stagnation and contemporary underdevelopment in the Third World.


***

If trust is too low in a society, savings will be insufficient to sustain
positive output growth. Such a poverty trap is more likely when institutions -
both formal and informal - which punish cheaters are weak.

Heap, Tan and Zizzo and others have come to similar conclusions.

In 2001, Zak and Knack showed that "strengthening the rule of law, reducing inequality, and by facilitating interpersonal understanding" all increase trust. They conclude:

Our analysis shows that trust can be raised directly by increasing communication and education, and indirectly by strengthening formal institutions that enforce contracts and by reducing income inequality. Among the policies that impact these factors, only education, redistributive transfers, and freedom satisfy the efficiency criterion which compares the cost of policies with the benefits citizens receive in terms of higher living standards. Further, our analysis suggests that good policy initiates a virtuous circle: policies that raise trust efficiently, improve living standards, raise civil liberties, enhance institutions, and reduce corruption, further raising trust. Trust, democracy, and the rule of law are thus the foundation of abiding prosperity.

"Enforcing contracts", "raising civil liberties", and "reducing corruption" and "democracy" all have to do with the rule of law, which - as discussed below - in turn, means prosecuting violations of the law. Likewise, by "enhancing institutions", they mean regulatory and justice systems which enforce contracts and prosecute cheaters.

And while Zak and Knack appear to favor redistribution of wealth, fighting inequality does not have to offend conservative values. As I recently pointed out, conservatives are against rampant inequality, and prosecuting fraud is the best way to reduce inequality:

Robert Shiller [one of the top housing economists in the United States] said in 2009:
And it's not like we want to level income. I'm not saying spread the wealth around, which got Obama in trouble. But I think, I would hope that this would be a time for a national consideration about policies that would focus on restraining any possible further increases in inequality.
***

If we stop bailing out the fraudsters and financial gamblers, the big banks would focus more on traditional lending and less on speculative plays which only make the rich richer and the poor poorer, and which guarantee future economic crises (which hurt the poor more than the rich).

***

Moreover, both conservatives and liberals agree that we need to prosecute financial fraud. As I've previously noted, fraud disproportionally benefits the big players, makes boom-bust cycles more severe, and otherwise harms the economy - all of which increase inequality and warp the market.

So once again, we are back to the importance of prosecuting fraud.

A 2005 letter in premier scientific journal Nature reviewed the research on trust and economics:

Trust ... plays a key role in economic exchange and politics. In the absence of trust among trading partners, market transactions break down. In the absence of trust in a country's institutions and leaders, political legitimacy breaks down. Much recent evidence indicates that trust contributes to economic, political and social success.

Forbes wrote an article in 2006 entitled "The Economics of Trust". The article summarizes the importance of trust in creating a healthy economy:

Imagine going to the corner store to buy a carton of milk, only to find that the refrigerator is locked. When you've persuaded the shopkeeper to retrieve the milk, you then end up arguing over whether you're going to hand the money over first, or whether he is going to hand over the milk. Finally you manage to arrange an elaborate simultaneous exchange. A little taste of life in a world without trust--now imagine trying to arrange a mortgage.

 

Being able to trust people might seem like a pleasant luxury, but economists are starting to believe that it's rather more important than that. Trust is about more than whether you can leave your house unlocked; it is responsible for the difference between the richest countries and the poorest.

 

"If you take a broad enough definition of trust, then it would explain basically all the difference between the per capita income of the United States and Somalia," ventures Steve Knack, a senior economist at the World Bank who has been studying the economics of trust for over a decade. That suggests that trust is worth $12.4 trillion dollars a year to the U.S., which, in case you are wondering, is 99.5% of this country's income.

 

***

 

Above all, trust enables people to do business with each other. Doing business is what creates wealth.

 

***

 

Economists distinguish between the personal, informal trust that comes from being friendly with your neighbors and the impersonal, institutionalized trust that lets you give your credit card number out over the Internet.

In 2007, Yann Algan (Professor of Economics at Paris School of Economics and University Paris East) and Pierre Cahuc (Professor of Economics at the Ecole Polytechnique (Paris)) reported:

We find a significant impact of trust on income per capita for 30 countries over the period 1949-2003.

Similarly, market psychologists Richard L. Peterson M.D. and Frank Murtha, PhD noted in 2008

Trust is the oil in the engine of capitalism, without it, the engine seizes up.

Confidence is like the gasoline, without it the machine won't move.

Trust is gone: there is no longer trust between counterparties in the financial system. Furthermore, confidence is at a low. Investors have lost their confidence in the ability of shares to provide decent returns (since they haven't).

In 2009, Paola Sapienza (associate professor of finance and the Zell Center Faculty Fellow at Northwestern University) and Luigi Zingales (Robert C. McCormack Professor of Entrepreneurship and Finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business) pointed out:

The drop in trust, we believe, is a major factor behind the deteriorating economic conditions. To demonstrate its importance, we launched the Chicago Booth/Kellogg School Financial Trust Index. Our first set of data—based on interviews conducted at the end of December 2008—shows that between September and December, 52 percent of Americans lost trust in the banks. Similarly, 65 percent lost trust in the stock market. A BBB/Gallup poll that surveyed a similar sample of Americans last April confirms this dramatic drop. At that time, 42 percent of Americans trusted financial institutions, versus 34 percent in our survey today, while 53 percent said they trusted U.S. companies, versus just 12 percent today.

 

As trust declines, so does Americans’ willingness to invest their money in the financial system. Our data show that trust in the stock market affects people’s intention to buy stocks, even after accounting for expectations of future stock-market performance. Similarly, a person’s trust in banks predicts the likelihood that he will make a run on his bank in a moment of crisis: 25 percent of those who don’t trust banks withdrew their deposits and stored them as cash last fall, compared with only 3 percent of those who said they still trusted the banks. Thus, trust in financial institutions is a key factor for the smooth functioning of capital markets and, by extension, the economy. Changes in trust matter.

They quote a Nobel laureate economist on the subject:

“Virtually every commercial transaction has within itself an element of trust,” writes economist Kenneth Arrow, a Nobel laureate. When we deposit money in a bank, we trust that it’s safe. When a company orders goods, it trusts its counterpart to deliver them in good faith. Trust facilitates transactions because it saves the costs of monitoring and screening; it is an essential lubricant that greases the wheels of the economic system.

In 2009, Time Magazine pointed out:

Traditionally, gold has been a store of value when citizens do not trust their government politically or economically.

In other words, the government's political actions affect investments, such as gold, and thus the broader economy.

In 2010, a distinguished international group of economists (Giancarlo Corsetti, Michael P. Devereux, Luigi Guiso, John Hassler, Gilles Saint-Paul, Hans-Werner Sinn, Jan-Egbert Sturm and Xavier Vives) wrote:

Public distrust of bankers and financial markets has risen dramatically with the financial crisis. This column argues that this loss of trust in the financial system played a critical role in the collapse of economic activity that followed. To undo the damage, financial regulation needs to focus on restoring that trust.

They noted:

Trust is crucial in many transactions and certainly in those involving financial exchanges. The massive drop in trust associated with this crisis will therefore have important implications for the future of financial markets. Data show that in the late 1970s, the percentage of people who reported having full trust in banks, brokers, mutual funds or the stock market was around 40%; it had sunk to around 30% just before the crisis hit, and collapsed to barely 5% afterwards. It is now even lower than the trust people have in other people (randomly selected of course).

Prosecuting the Criminals Is Necessary to Restore Trust

Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz says that we have to prosecute fraud or else the economy won't recover:

The legal system is supposed to be the codification of our norms and beliefs, things that we need to make our system work. If the legal system is seen as exploitative, then confidence in our whole system starts eroding. And that's really the problem that's going on.

***

I think we ought to go do what we did in the S&L [crisis] and actually put many of these guys in prison. Absolutely. These are not just white-collar crimes or little accidents. There were victims. That's the point. There were victims all over the world.

***

Economists focus on the whole notion of incentives.
People have an incentive sometimes to behave badly, because they can make more money if they can cheat. If our economic system is going to work then we have to make sure that what they gain when they cheat is offset by a system of penalties.

Robert Shiller said recently that failing to address the legal issues will cause Americans to lose faith in business and the government:

Shiller said the danger of foreclosuregate -- the scandal in which it has come to light that the biggest banks have routinely mishandled homeownership documents, putting the legality of foreclosures and related sales in doubt -- is a replay of the 1930s, when Americans lost faith that institutions such as business and government were dealing fairly.

Economists such as William Black and James Galbraith agree. Galbraith says:

There will have to be full-scale investigation and cleaning up of the residue of that, before you can have, I think, a return of confidence in the financial sector. And that's a process which needs to get underway.

Galbraith also says that economists should move into the background, and "criminologists to the forefront".

Government regulators know this - or at least pay lip service to it - as well. For example, as the Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission's enforcement division told Congress:

Recovery from the fallout of the financial crisis requires important efforts on various fronts, and vigorous enforcement is an essential component, as aggressive and even-handed enforcement will meet the public's fair expectation that those whose violations of the law caused severe loss and hardship will be held accountable. And vigorous law enforcement efforts will help vindicate the principles that are fundamental to the fair and proper functioning of our markets: that no one should have an unjust advantage in our markets; that investors have a right to disclosure that complies with the federal securities laws; and that there is a level playing field for all investors.

Nobel prize winning economist George Akerlof has demonstrated that failure to punish white collar criminals - and instead bailing them out- creates incentives for more economic crimes and further destruction of the economy in the future. Indeed, William Black notes that we've known of this dynamic for "hundreds of years". And see this, this, this and this.

Of course, it's not just economists saying this.

One of the leading business schools in America - the Wharton School of Business - published an essay by a psychologist on the causes and solutions to the economic crisis. Wharton points out that restoring trust is the key to recovery, and that trust cannot be restored until wrongdoers are held accountable:

According to David M. Sachs, a training


Jeff Nielson: Monetizing silver -- instant prosperity

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 11:50 AM PST

7:45p ET Monday, March 7, 2011

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold (and Silver):

Your secretary/treasurer has often remarked that Mexico, like South Africa, is a fabulously rich country perversely insisting on being desperately poor. With his new commentary, Jeff Nielson of Bullion Bulls Canada proves the case. Nielson's commentary is headlined "Monetizing Silver: Instant Prosperity" and you can find it at Bullion Bulls Canada here:

http://www.bullionbullscanada.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=arti...

Or try this abbreviated link:

http://tinyurl.com/4g7oybl

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy Resource Spins Off Platinum/Palladium Venture:
World-Class PGM Deposit in Yukon

Company Press Release, January 18, 2011

VANCOUVER, British Columbia -- Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX-V:PCY)and Pacific Coast Nickel Corp. announce that they have agreed that PCNC will acquire Prophecy's Nickel PGM projects by issuing common shares to Prophecy.

PCNC will acquire the Wellgreen PGM Ni-Cu and Lynn Lake nickel projects in the Yukon Territory and Manitoba respectively by issuing up to 550 million common shares of PCNC to Prophecy. PCNC has 55.7 million shares outstanding.

Following the transaction:

-- Prophecy will own approximately 90 percent of PCNC.

-- PCNC will consolidate its share capital on a 10 old for one new basis.

-- Prophecy will change its name to Prophecy Coal Corp. and PCNC will be renamed Prophecy Platinum Corp.

-- Prophecy intends to distribute half of its PCNC shares to shareholders pro-rata in accordance with their holdings.

Based on the closing price of the common shares of PCNC on January 17, $0.195 per share, the gross value of the transaction is $107,250,000.

For the complete announcement, please visit:

http://prophecyresource.com/news_2011_jan18.php



Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Sona Drills 85.4g Gold/Ton Over 4 Metres at Elizabeth Gold Deposit, Extending the Mineralization of the Southwest Vein on the Property

Company Press Release, October 27, 2010

VANCOUVER, British Columbia -- Sona Resources Corp. reports on five drillling holes in the third round of assay results from the recently completed drill program at its 100 percent-owned Elizabeth Gold Deposit Property in the Lillooet Mining District of southern British Columbia. Highlights from the diamond drilling include:

-- Hole E10-66 intersected 17.4g gold/ton over 1.54 metres.

-- Hole E10-67 intersected 96.4g gold/ton over 2.5 metres, including one assay interval of 383g of gold/ton over 0.5 metres.

-- Hole E10-69 intersected 85.4g gold/ton over 4.03 metres, including one assay interval of 230g gold/ton over 1 metre.

Four drill holes, E10-66 to E10-69, targeted the southwestern end of the Southwest Vein, and three of the holes have expanded the mineralized zone in that direction. The Southwest Vein gold mineralization has now been intersected over a strike length of 325 metres, with the deepest hole drilled less than 200 metres from surface.

"The assay results from the Southwest Zone quartz vein continue to be extremely positive," says John P. Thompson, Sona's president and CEO. "We are expanding the Southwest Vein, and this high-grade gold mineralization remains wide open down dip and along strike to the southwest."

For the company's full press release, please visit:

http://sonaresources.com/_resources/news/SONA_NR19_2010.pdf



Heavy Hitters Talk About The Virtues of Gold

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 11:25 AM PST

[U]www.preciousmetalstockreview.com March 5, 2011 [/U] It was a strong week for the precious metals especially Silver. We had a few large players in the world talk about Gold and the coming further weakness of the US Dollar and it’s lessening role throughout the world. All in all it was a great, constructive week. Metals did well and the US markets continued their consolidation before the next leg higher within a week or two. The S&P target of 1,440 I mentioned later on in 2010 is still very much in play once we get through this period of consolidation. It was volatile to say the least this past week but that’s a good thing as long as you recognize it and don’t get suckered into new positions without a good reason to. The S&P 500 is in a period of chop, or you could say trading in the middle of a range with no clear direction. These are the times that you must avoid trading as your account will be whipsawed...


The 5th Place Winner of This Year’s Daily Reckoning Financial Darwin Awards

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 11:19 AM PST

The state of the states is not good, Fellow Reckoner. Cracks are beginning to appear in their veneer. The illusion of vitality and control is coming into question. Even people with better things to do than pay attention to politics are beginning to sense that the charade may be up. They suspect their mayors and governors – and perhaps even their kings and queens – have no clothes on. Some have started pointing fingers and waving placards. They vow to stay and fight. Others are planning their exit…while they still can.

We are not gathered here today to offer tears and condolences for failing and flailing states. By any measure one cares to employ, the very idea of "The State" itself has had a pretty good run. Forged in the crucible of ancient Egypt some 6,000 years ago, the state has morphed through iterations as many and varied as the seasons between them. From the Pharaohs through to warlords, kings and queens, generalissimos, barbarians, emperors, chairmen, führers, shoguns, sheiks, tsars, presidents, prime ministers and the rest of the scoundrels, nobody could say we humans didn't give The State a fair go. Quite the contrary. We gave it every opportunity to succeed. And more.

Our forefathers tried hereditary rule, divine rule, rule by majority, minority, by power, money and force of every stripe and style. They drafted manifestos, constitutions, bills of rights and Little Red Books. Every conceivable form of "The State" has been given its turn. We've tweaked it, tortured it and tinkered with it for long enough. And now, after six millennia in the political lab, after countless wars and untold lives surrendered to whatever the "cause" of the day happened to be, we see what we have for our troubles.

There are resources enough to feed every mouth in the world. Yet, most of one entire continent starves to death. People living in vast swathes of another are not much better off. Two more, at least, face imminent insolvency and surefire social upheavals, revolutions, even wars. Brutal, iron-fisted dictators rise in the poorest regions of our world, supported and installed by their democratically elected counterparts in far off lands, where people who call themselves good don't care to read bad news. And in the most powerful nation the planet has ever seen, a mighty behemoth with military arsenal enough to lay waste to the entire human population many times over, more than 40 million of its own citizens live on food stamps, barely able to get by. That many again are supported directly by the state, that grand experiment we've devoted six thousand years to testing, but which we still don't quite understand.

But again, we are not here today to wallow in commiserations and condolences. As Vancouver favorite and good friend Doug Casey likes to say, the situation may be helpless, but it's not serious. Indeed.

It is said that nature abhors a vacuum. The same is true of political and economic eco-systems. Where one species, one gene, one dollar staggers toward extinction, another evolves, emerging to fill the void. Financial crises, revolutions, bankruptcies and currency crashes are all part of the process. Rather than be feared, these occurrences ought to be celebrated as a necessary part of the cycle. A renewal, of sorts. It is the unleashing of productive capital and the freeing of minds for new and better ways to trade, think and arrange ourselves politically and economically. Of course, this is by no means a new idea.

Charles Darwin, his focus more on the animal kingdom than the political thrones of man, called the process "evolution by natural selection." The weak perish at the hands, and to the advantage, of the strong as nature selects for and promotes the most efficient, adaptive species. Cruel as the system sounds, we simply wouldn't be here without it. Joseph Schumpeter, in his 1942 work, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, coined for the same economic process the term "creative destruction." Innovative entrepreneurs are the driving force behind long-term economic growth and prosperity, Schumpeter argued, but they occasionally, necessarily, displace the "value" of established companies and business models in the process.

And in the political realm? What happens when a government spends too much of its citizens' money, or grows too inefficient, or simply loses the support of those who, knowingly or not, spend their efforts creating the means and circumstances for its existence? What becomes of that king, that governor, that political philosophy when those who fuel it lose faith in their leaders' power and the viability of the system in general? Communism, monarchism, fascism, feudalism…nothing lasts forever. Right now, across the Middle East and North Africa the sword is falling on some well-deserved necks. What started in the relatively minor economy of Tunisia has now spread to Kuwait and even threatens the House of Saud.

What will fill this Middle East-shaped political vacuum, then? We've tried statism in every manifestation conceived. After 6,000 years and counting, isn't it about time for something new?

Back in the US, we're keeping an eye on the states within The States. As you may have read, we're down to the finalists in our Daily Reckoning Financial Darwin Awards: The State Edition. We announced the final ten in the weekend edition (in alphabetical order) – California, Connecticut, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, Ohio and Wisconsin.

Each day this week we'll count down from fifth place to the winning state, which we'll announce on Friday.

Today's State, coming in at fifth place, is rather small and not usually one to pop up on the radars. One reader, who has since relocated to warmer climes, described his former state of residence as a "financial basket case with a political class full of clowns."

Ok…so we'll need more specifics…

Although her projected budget shortfall for 2012 is "only" $3.7 billion, much less than some of the larger states, today's feature state suffers a debt to GDP ratio of 12.5%…only marginally lower than that of Greece. And, like the shaky Club Med economies, individual states don't have the option of printing/inflating their obligations away.

Writes another reader:

"No doubt you are well aware of the budget and jobs crisis circus in [this state]. Any intelligent person would think it should be right at the top of the priority list for our Senators and Representatives to act on. Not so!

"Recently, the two clowns representing my district have introduced legislation to have the Tibetan Language put on our licenses, in addition to English. Although hard to believe, this is the type of legislation our Legislators consistently deem to be important and appropriate.

"Needles to say, I believe our state is a prime contender for your Darwin Awards.

"By the way, I'll be proposing our State's motto be changed from 'The Constitution State' to 'The State of Denial.'"

In case you haven't guessed it yet, with almost $5,000 in per capita state debt and unfunded pensions per capita weighing in closer to $18,000, our fifth place choice for this year's Daily Reckoning Financial Darwin Awards is…

Connecticut.

That still leaves 9 contenders for the final four places. Tune in tomorrow to see if your state makes the list.

Joel Bowman
for The Daily Reckoning

The 5th Place Winner of This Year's Daily Reckoning Financial Darwin Awards originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning has published articles on the impact of quantitative easing, bakken oil, and hyperinflation.


Siddharth Rajeev's Commodities Rundown, From Au To V

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 11:14 AM PST

Source: Brian Sylvester of The Gold Report 03/07/2011 There is more to the periodic table—and to investing opportunities—than gold, silver and copper. Siddharth Rajeev, vice president and head of research at Fundamental Research Corp., sums up the market prospects for rare earth elements (REE) and a host of metals. He unearths some new names and some historical finds in this exclusive interview with The Gold Report. The Gold Report: Sid, today we're going to talk about a number of different metals: gold, silver, vanadium, copper and rare earths. Could you handicap each of those metals for us, starting with gold, copper and silver? Siddharth Rajeev: Let's look first at the factors that have been driving up commodity prices. We think two key factors are responsible. Number one is increasing global demand; the second is the continued weakness in the U.S. dollar. Let's look at increasing global demand. We believe in the Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRI...


Portfolio's true value is in ounces, not dollars, Embry tells King World News

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 11:13 AM PST

7:05p ET Monday, March 7, 2011

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold (and Silver):

Sprott Asset Management's John Embry tells Eric King that demands for delivery could explode the derivatives-fueled suppression of silver, that other governments are likely to devalue their own currencies to support the U.S. dollar if it starts breaking down too much, that such devaluation can only send the precious metals upward, and that the true measure of an investment portfolio isn't any dollar figure but its total ounces of precious metal. The interview is 12 minutes long and you can listen to it at King World News here:

http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2011/3/7_Jo...

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.



ADVERTISEMENT

Prophecy Resource Spins Off Platinum/Palladium Venture:
World-Class PGM Deposit in Yukon

Company Press Release, January 18, 2011

VANCOUVER, British Columbia -- Prophecy Resource Corp. (TSX-V:PCY)and Pacific Coast Nickel Corp. announce that they have agreed that PCNC will acquire Prophecy's Nickel PGM projects by issuing common shares to Prophecy.

PCNC will acquire the Wellgreen PGM Ni-Cu and Lynn Lake nickel projects in the Yukon Territory and Manitoba respectively by issuing up to 550 million common shares of PCNC to Prophecy. PCNC has 55.7 million shares outstanding.

Following the transaction:

-- Prophecy will own approximately 90 percent of PCNC.

-- PCNC will consolidate its share capital on a 10 old for one new basis.

-- Prophecy will change its name to Prophecy Coal Corp. and PCNC will be renamed Prophecy Platinum Corp.

-- Prophecy intends to distribute half of its PCNC shares to shareholders pro-rata in accordance with their holdings.

Based on the closing price of the common shares of PCNC on January 17, $0.195 per share, the gross value of the transaction is $107,250,000.

For the complete announcement, please visit:

http://prophecyresource.com/news_2011_jan18.php



Support GATA by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:

http://gata.org/tshirts

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

http://gata.org/node/wallstreetjournal

Or a video disc of GATA's 2005 Gold Rush 21 conference in the Yukon:

http://www.goldrush21.com/

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



ADVERTISEMENT

Sona Drills 85.4g Gold/Ton Over 4 Metres at Elizabeth Gold Deposit, Extending the Mineralization of the Southwest Vein on the Property

Company Press Release, October 27, 2010

VANCOUVER, British Columbia -- Sona Resources Corp. reports on five drillling holes in the third round of assay results from the recently completed drill program at its 100 percent-owned Elizabeth Gold Deposit Property in the Lillooet Mining District of southern British Columbia. Highlights from the diamond drilling include:

-- Hole E10-66 intersected 17.4g gold/ton over 1.54 metres.

-- Hole E10-67 intersected 96.4g gold/ton over 2.5 metres, including one assay interval of 383g of gold/ton over 0.5 metres.

-- Hole E10-69 intersected 85.4g gold/ton over 4.03 metres, including one assay interval of 230g gold/ton over 1 metre.

Four drill holes, E10-66 to E10-69, targeted the southwestern end of the Southwest Vein, and three of the holes have expanded the mineralized zone in that direction. The Southwest Vein gold mineralization has now been intersected over a strike length of 325 metres, with the deepest hole drilled less than 200 metres from surface.

"The assay results from the Southwest Zone quartz vein continue to be extremely positive," says John P. Thompson, Sona's president and CEO. "We are expanding the Southwest Vein, and this high-grade gold mineralization remains wide open down dip and along strike to the southwest."

For the company's full press release, please visit:

http://sonaresources.com/_resources/news/SONA_NR19_2010.pdf



Which Gold Producer Best Mimics Gold Price? A Correlation Perspective

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 11:13 AM PST

Soner Kistak submits:

As investing in gold becomes more popular in light of the latest macro developments, the stocks of gold mining companies also have come to the forefront. Obviously, some investors also wanted to focus on the gold theme indirectly to capture the catch-up potential of these gold miners. In this context, it is important to identify the main gold stocks with the highest correlation to gold.

If one looks at the correlation between the stock prices of main gold producers traded in the U.S. market and the gold price on a weekly basis, the following observations can be made:

  • Over the course of the last 10 years, the stocks of major Gold Producers like Barrick Gold (ABX), Goldcorp (GG) and Newmont Mining (NEM) consistently showed a high level of correlation with the gold price. While it is clear that the companies have significantly different fundamentals than gold itself, the consistently high

Complete Story »


Gold Price Completed Correction, Higher Prices Tomorrow Unless It Trades Below $1,428

Posted: 07 Mar 2011 11:07 AM PST

Gold Price Close Today : 1434.10
Change : 5.90 or 0.4%

Silver Price Close Today : 35.855
Change : 0.538 cents or 1.5%

Gold Silver Ratio Today : 40.00
Change : -0.442 or -1.1%

Silver Gold Ratio Today : 0.02500
Change : 0.000273 or 1.1%

Platinum Price Close Today : 1818.80
Change : -16.30 or -0.9%

Palladium Price Close Today : 788.65
Change : -21.00 or -2.6%

S&P 500 : 1,310.13
Change : -11.02 or -0.8%

Dow In GOLD$ : $174.27
Change : $ (1.86) or -1.1%

Dow in GOLD oz : 8.430
Change : -0.090 or -1.1%

Dow in SILVER oz : 337.19
Change : -2.28 or -0.7%

Dow Industrial : 12,090.03
Change : -79.85 or -0.7%

US Dollar Index : 76.47
Change : 0.075 or 0.1%

I suspect-guess-reckon that from Thursday of last week through today the GOLD PRICE completed an up move. Today's high was $1,444.20, just before the New York market opened. It then dropped from the openings, bottoming at $1,428.05 just before noon, then climbing to a Comex close at $1,434.10, $5.90 higher than Friday. Gold appears to have finished a correction today, which makes it a candidate for higher prices tomorrow. Trading below $1,428 would gainsay that forecast flat-footed, and drag gold lower.

Platinum and Palladium didn't behave well today. That doesn't help silver and gold.

Dull day for the SILVER PRICE, it only gained 53.8c on Comex today, closing at a new high of 3585.5c. Silver's pattern today mimicked gold's. It made a new high at 3673c (not a typo), extending its rise from Thursday and probably making at least a short term top. Today's close was bumping along the bottom of the day's trading range. Below 3500c silver runs into trouble.

Again, I put my hand over my mouth. In these crazy straight up rises, a market is liable to go anywhere or stop anytime. However, the backwardation in silver is much plainer now and more pronounced than it has been -- curve is flattening, if you will. That means it's about time for the exchange or the government -- or both -- to step in a pick the public's pocket before some of the banks and market makers begin to lose money on their short positions.

Y'all cut me some slack. I write these commentaries at day's end, running like a scalded dog to get them written and sent, so proof-reading occurs, but at a minimal and hurried level. When you see some obvious, egregious error, it is probably just that, an error, so say to yourself, "Poor old fellow. He's just not as sharp as he used to be."

Case in point was the silly error on Friday about the GOLD/SILVER RATIO plunge from its 84.329 reaction high in Autumn 2008. Friday the ratio had fallen to 40.439, which, as any 2nd grader could tell you, is NOT down 25.7% from its high (as I wrote), but rather 52.05% below it.

Scanning over the day, my eyes catch on the stock market. Have y'all noticed how the Dow keeps on knocking on 12,050? Today was the third time, and there is no such thing as a triple bottom. Tomorrow, or soon, it will knock at 12,050 and the trap door there will prove rotten and give way.

Believe me, I know how many people have hopes and dreams of retirement pinned on the stock market, and it give me no pleasure to warn you. Stay at your grievous risk.

Dow today lost 79.85 points to close at 12,090.03. S&P 500 lost a little more percentagewise, down 11.02 to 1,310.13. Downtrend is established, and the plunge will come.

US DOLLAR INDEX made a spike bottom today at 76.124, then rose above 76.40. This is merely a little intraday pattern, so it must walk ahead and confirm the bottom by climbing and continuing to gain. The Euro dropped to 1.3972. Yet the breakout to the upside remains on the chart, and the Euro must close below 1.3841 to change direction.

Some time or the other, before too awful long, the dollar ought to turn around. Logically silver, gold, and stocks are due for a down phase, and a rising dollar helps drive that. Yet things happen in the fullness of their own time, and not to my order. Dollar could become much more oversold from here still before it turns.

Behold, I am not a cynic, I am a realist. Every market in the US is run with government collusion for the benefit of the financial houses. Ned Schmidt even noted today that the Federal Reserve kept interest rates low to keep the cheap speculative money flowing to Wall Street. If there's a candid, honest financial market in this country, I don't know what it is.

But I do not despair. I hope. Eleven states now have bills threatening to establish silver and gold as an alternative tender to Federal Reserve notes. Mercy! Just let that dance across your mind a minute. From 1981 to 2000 I was hounded, investigated, indicted, nearly killed, acquitted, convicted, and jailed because I insisted that the US and state constitutions and statutes and cases say that only SILVER and GOLD are US money. I was branded a monetary crank, a nut-case, a lunatic, and even The Most Dangerous Man in the Mid-South by an assistant US attorney-ess. Now, looky here, eleven states are trying to assert the same.

I reckon the Nice Government Men -- bless their tiny, stony hearts -- are going to have to add a lot of new cells in jails and lunatic asylums all over eleven states, or else I'm in danger of becoming mainstream.

Argentum et aurum comparenda sunt -- -- Gold and silver must be bought.

- Franklin Sanders, The Moneychanger
The-MoneyChanger.com
Phone: (888) 218-9226 or (931) 766-6066

© 2011, The Moneychanger. May not be republished in any form, including electronically, without our express permission.

To avoid confusion, please remember that the comments above have a very short time horizon. Always invest with the primary trend. Gold's primary trend is up, targeting at least $3,130.00; silver's primary is up targeting 16:1 gold/silver ratio or $195.66; stocks' primary trend is down, targeting Dow under 2,900 and worth only one ounce of gold; US$ or US$-denominated assets, primary trend down; real estate in a bubble, primary trend way down. Whenever I write "Stay out of stocks" readers inevitably ask, "Do you mean precious metals mining stocks, too?" No, I don't.


No comments:

Post a Comment