A unique and safe way to buy gold and silver 2013 Passport To Freedom Residency Kit
Buy Gold & Silver With Bitcoins!

Friday, May 28, 2010

Gold World News Flash

Gold World News Flash


A tribute to Jeff Christian, loyal soldier in the battle against gold

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:16 PM PDT


The Great Deceit

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:11 PM PDT

It is the paper money created out of thin air that creates the unfair distribution of wealth that is making the middle class fall more behind and the poor more poor. Newly created money and credit in a paper money system benefits those that can access the money first and buy capital goods and real property at one price before the new money circulates and makes all prices go up. Wages also do not keep up with inflation and that creates another squeeze on the middle class.


Peeling Back the Layers of the Golden Ponzi Scheme

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:05 PM PDT

Gold sales are soaring. More than 200,000 ounces of gold and three million ounces of silver were sold by the U.S. Mint in May. With a week left to go, gold sales are on pace to double the previous 2010 monthly high set in April.


Jim?s Mailbox

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:03 PM PDT

View the original post at jsmineset.com... May 27, 2010 03:57 PM Posted by CIGA Eric in April of 2010: "Many have observed that the money supply, now buried by the Fed, has been steady contracting since 2009. The continuation of M3, a broad money supply measure, indicates a negative year-over-year contraction. Many observers cite these trends as a precondition of deflation. Quite the contrary, this could be a precondition of aggressive inflation as keenly described in The Mystery of Banking. When prices are going up faster than the money supply, the people begin to experience a severe shortage of money, for they now face a shortage of cash balances relative to the much higher price levels. It the Fed’s response to the contraction, likely print money money, that will affect confidence in the dollar." More…   Dear Jim, The end of the article appears to contain a bit of MOPE, but the "facts" contained herein regarding the FHA and the amount of loans they are backi...


How Money Works

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

View the original post at jsmineset.com... May 27, 2010 04:01 PM Dear CIGAs, What makes something a standard is because there is a restricted supply of it. From money.howstuffworks.com We have all seen those movies with rooms full of gold. Well this is far from reality. In fact there is very little gold around. Below is a metric tonne of gold. It is only 15 cubic inches. Only slightly larger than a milk crate! If you collected all the gold ever extracted from the earth and stacked it up in a column with the same base size as the Washington Monument you would get this. ALL THE GOLD IN THE WORLD!!! How big is a tonne of gold? Gold is traditionally weighed in Troy Ounces (31.1035 grammes). With the density of gold at 19.32 g/cm3, a troy ounce of gold would have a volume of 1.61 cm3. A metric tonne (equals 1,000kg = 32,150.72 troy ounces) of gold would therefore have a volume of 51,762 cm3 (i.e. 1.61 x 32,150.72), which would be equivalent to a cube of side 37.27cm (Appr...


Total Fed Credit Takes Credit for Inflationary Nightmares

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

I was having another nightmare about how the inflation in consumer prices that is guaranteed by the Federal Reserve creating so much money (so that the loathsome Obama administration can borrow and spend it) was some kind of weird replay of The Lord of the Flies, which seems kind of odd since I haven't read, or thought about, that book since the '60s when I was required to read it for English class, and I really don't remember much about it except that there was a pig (which I assume was a metaphor for the Federal Reserve), and everyone reverted to acting like tribal savages, killing each other in gruesome fashion, which I assume was because inflation in prices was raging across the island and food cost so much that everybody was starving, which would explain angry people killing each other! Hey! This economics stuff is easy! I don't remember my teacher stressing this obvious metaphor, although, now that we are suffering due to the utter failure of the Federal Reserve, maybe he should...


An American Concept: Crushing Debt

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

By David Galland, Managing Director, Casey Research Commenting on the European crisis – because this has gone well past being one that can be termed “Greek” – the New York Times cited a senior U.S. official on the significant role the U.S., including Obama himself, played in getting Europe’s leadership to agree to a bailout approaching one trillion. One particularly telling quote… The U.S. officials began talking to their counterparts about an American concept: overwhelming force. “It’s all about psychology,” said the senior official. Funny how these things work, isn’t it? In response to its own debt crisis, the U.S. mirrors the failed Japanese experiment in quantitative easing, except that we look to “fix” the flaw in that experiment with the overwhelming force of trillions upon trillions of unsupported spending, in the process making the idea of unleashing a money flood an “American concept...


Manic Market, Innovation Cycle, Alzheimer’s Blockbuster, Reader Outrage, and More!

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

The 5 min. Forecast May 27, 2010 01:40 PM by Addison Wiggin & Ian Mathias [LIST] [*]Why Mr. Market is going manic [*]Oh, to be 28-years-old again: How one company is aiming to make it happen [*]The "innovation cycle" in a down economy [*]The Alzheimer's "blockbuster" dial an organ and a cure for deafness [*] Our “detachment from all that is decent”… readers outraged by our take on BP… our candid response [/LIST] An increasingly bipolar Mr. Market, to borrow a phrase from the inimitable James Grant, is having one of his manic episodes today. The Dow opened up 1.5% in the first half-hour of trading. China denied rumors that it’s about to bail out of its forex reserves held in euros. First-time jobless claims fell last week. And the Coast Guard says BP’s “top kill” effort to plug the oil blowout in the Gulf of Mexico appears to be working. All’s well with the world… until Mr. Market enters one of hi...


Stock Markets & Gold. Tactical Update

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

Graceland Updates 4am-7am www.gracelandupdates.com Email: [EMAIL="s2p3t4@sympatico.ca"]s2p3t4@sympatico.ca[/EMAIL] May 27, 2010 1. Those sure that Tuesday's Dow action marked the bottom, (the "hammer" on the candle charts) were shocked 24hrs later, as the Dow posted a mirror image reversal day to the downside. This morning the Dow is once again surging, stunning the bears. 2. This is classic whipsaw action, a saw operated by the banksters, cleaning both shorts and longs off the stock market souvlaki stick. It is also only example number 800 billion, of why you must allocate your capital in a pyramid formation, not a huge price plop. 3. I have noted the danger of obsession in the market, and the greatest obsession in the gold community is: shorting the Dow. 1987, 1990, 1998, 2000, and 2007 are the 5 major shorting opportunities that have occurred since the great secular bull of the 1980s began, and has since been replaced by the secular bear i...


Client Update – Silver Quest Resources

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

The following is automatically syndicated from Grandich's blog. You can view the original post here May 27, 2010 10:11 AM Re-ignition of the Yukon – A step closer to the golden glow Yukon News Yesterday, Kaminak Gold announced drill results that have given new life to the Yukon Gold plays.* Kaminak intersected 15.5 metres of 17.1 g/t gold in their first drill hole of the season.* Their second drill hole, drilled from the same location but at a steeper angle intersected 2 significant gold bearing intersections including 1.26 g/t of gold over 60.23 metres and 1.15 g/t gold over 51.32 metres.* These results are promising for the entire Dawson Range district, including Silver Quest's Boulevard property which is located directly south and contiguous to Kaminak's Coffee project.* Boulevard has many geological similarities to both the Supremo Zone at Coffee and the Golden Saddle Deposit on Underworld's (Kinross') White Gold Property. Boulevard Status The Boulevard project has been exten...


'Goldman Sachs is the Undeclared Enemy of the State' - Jim Rickards

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

Gold didn't do much of anything in Far East trading on Wednesday... up just a few dollars from its New York close on Tuesday. And, as I mentioned in my closing comments in yesterday's column, once London opened, the activity level picked up quite a bit... with the London high in gold coming around 11:00 a.m. local time... which was 6:00 a.m. in New York. But that was it for the day, as gold basically traded sideways all through the rest of London trading, plus all of New York. Gold's high of the day [$1,217.80 spot] occurred shortly before 11:00 a.m. Eastern time. Volume was extremely light for the second day in a row... with no big buyers or sellers lurking about. But the roll-over and switching volume in gold is enormous... as today is the last day of trading for the May contract. Silver's price, as usual, was more 'volatile'... but generally followed the gold price. The high price point for silver occurred at the same time as gold's high... and that price...


Critical Juncture - Update on the euro, Australian dollar and Japanese yen

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

Axel Merk, Portfolio Manager, Merk Mutual Funds May 27, 2010 Our long-term outlook on the euro remains more positive than that of many market participants. There are numerous reasons for our view, amongst others because it is more difficult to print and spend money in the eurozone. Fiscal coordination is rapidly improving in the eurozone, addressing the euro area's key deficiencies. Since the announcement of the $1 trillion credit line less than 3 weeks ago, Spain, Portugal and Italy have all passed substantial fiscal consolidation measures. Germany is also seizing the opportunity, proposing to reform labor markets. That said, the market is demanding more substantial changes that not only cut costs, but provide a catalyst for future growth. To achieve this, true reform of the labor markets is needed, including increasing the retirement age. Germany may be the leader in imposing austerity, but the country's bizarre approach to capital market reform ...


Hidden Dollar Swap Hammer

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

[FONT=Times New Roman]by Jim Willie CB May 26, 2010[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]home: Golden Jackass website[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]subscribe: Hat Trick Letter[/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]Jim Willie CB, editor of the “HAT TRICK LETTER” [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]Use the above link to subscribe to the paid research reports, which include coverage of several smallcap companies positioned to rise during the ongoing panicky attempt to sustain an unsustainable system burdened by numerous imbalances aggravated by global village forces. An historically unprecedented mess has been created by compromised central bankers and inept economic advisors, whose interference has irreversibly altered and damaged the world financial system, urgently pushed after the removed anchor of money to gold. Analysis features Gold, Crude Oil, USDollar, Treasury bonds, and inter-market dynamics with the US Economy and US Federal Reserve monetary policy.[/FONT] [FONT=Times ...


LGMR: Gold Bullish, Well Supported as Risk Eases. US Hits Frightening Deflation

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

London Gold Market Report from Adrian Ash BullionVault 08:40 ET, Thurs 27 May Gold "Bullish, Well Supported" as "Risk Eases" But US Hits "Frightening" Deflation in Money-Supply THE PRICE OF PHYSICAL GOLD in wholesale dealing slipped from an early 6-session high in London on Thursday, ticking back to $1207 an ounce but remaining 3.1% higher for May-to-date. World stock markets rallied further, cutting more than a third of this month's 8% losses. Government bonds retreated and the Euro reversed Wednesday's losses – briefly trading above $1.23 – after the Beijing authorities said that reports they are reviewing China's Eurozone bond holdings were "groundless". US crude oil contracts jumped sharply once more, hitting $73 per barrel. Both the gold price in Sterling and in Euros dropped 1.7% from 1-week highs hit overnight. Silver investment bars held unchanged from the start of May near $18.40 an ounce. "There are increased signs of risk easing," n...


United Mining Group Poised For Production in Idaho’s Silver Valley

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

By Claire O'Connor and James West MidasLetter.com Thursday, May 27, 2010 On May 10th 2010, United Mining Group (CNSX:UMG), formerly Scarlet Resources Ltd., began trading on the CNSX under the stock symbol UMG. UMG is an exploration group with a difference; not only does the company own and operate a lucrative mine services company, they’ve also entered into an earn-in agreement to earn an 80% interest in the Crescent Mine – a past producing silver mine in North Idaho’s “Silver Valley”. Perched loftily in a position of financial stability that most juniors can only dream of, UMG is aiming for phase one production with Crescent in Q4 2010 - Q1 2011. All permits and financing are already in place. Located in Northern Idaho’s historic Coeur d’Alene district - famously referred to as “The Silver Valley...


But, You Sputtered, I'm Just A Hack....

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

Market Ticker - Karl Denninger View original article May 27, 2010 06:21 AM That is, with all my pesky math and charts like this: Remember that I've been preaching for a while that we embedded a roughly $500-600 billion structural deficit into the economy post-2000?  And that now, in response to this recession (and in a refusal to admit that we have been playing credit drunk) we've now embedded a roughly 10% structural deficit - three times the former? Before you consider me a chucklehead for having the temerity to look at the math you might take it up with the BIS - the Bank of International Settlements, or the "bankers's bank" - which agrees with me: [INDENT]According to the Bank for International Settlements, the United States' structural deficit — the amount of our deficit adjusted for the economic cycle — has increased from 3.1 percent of gross domestic product in 2007 to 9.2 percent in 2010. [/INDENT]Gee, you mean they looked at the same chart I've been ...


Gold Stock Trades on Taseko Mines

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

The following is automatically syndicated from Grandich's blog. You can view the original post here May 27, 2010 04:58 AM Read [url]http://www.grandich.com/[/url] grandich.com...


Litigation Killing What Derivatives Aren?t

Posted: 27 May 2010 06:02 PM PDT

View the original post at jsmineset.com... May 26, 2010 07:50 PM Dear CIGAs, Whatever OTC derivatives do not do to the investment banks, litigation will. Litigation is both civil and criminal. No civil suit based on derivatives can ever go to judgement by jury because it will be a stone cold loser. Even a bench trial would present significant risk to the defendant. OTC derivatives are the basic problem about which nothing has been done and nothing will be done. That secures the final end which is gold as the only standard, measure and storehouse of value functioning as a medium exchange. By definition that is what money is. Gold is the only money that can be trusted as debt is being added to debt in a ridiculous plan to cure a problem. The fiat system is cooked, and there is simply no good paper currency. The face of this world is about to change. Sir Richard Russell is correct. Please protect yourselves because you must. I can point you in the right direction. It is you must ta...


If 1 + 1 Still Equals 2 Then Gold Should Explode!

Posted: 27 May 2010 05:49 PM PDT



Make your Silver Years Golden

Posted: 27 May 2010 05:47 PM PDT



The Gold & Silver Precious Metals Correction

Posted: 27 May 2010 05:35 PM PDT



Why Deleveraging Is Necessary For Economic Recovery

Posted: 27 May 2010 04:49 PM PDT


From The Daily Capitalist

A Plan For Recovery

While bank closures and high foreclosure and mortgage default rates are universally seen as negative impacts on the economy, it is closures and foreclosures that we need for a recovery. The bearers of such news are usually ignored as doom-sayers, bears, or Cassandras: no one wants to hear bad news. A fear of "bad news" is what has been driving the government's recovery policies and that is why this recession is not over. In fact those same policies may be leading us to a renewed period of decline.

It is of course unfortunate and sad to see banks close and people lose their homes. But when put in the context of the boom years when personal, corporate, bank, and government debt went off the charts, deleveraging has the effect of creating the conditions needed for a recovery.

We have not recovered. We see people still saddled by high personal debt. We see most banks weighed down by bad loans from commercial real estate, residential development, and consumer loans. We see deflation continue to drive residential real estate and commercial real estate down, further magnifying the the impact. As a consequence, credit is still largely frozen for most individual and business borrowers, money supply continues to shrink, the economy appears to be headed to stagnation, and unemployment remains disturbingly high.

While very large corporations and perhaps the ten largest money center banks have access to credit, it hasn't helped most Americans or the majority of businesses. In fact, last quarter's profits for those large financial institutions were at impossible record levels based on the lucrative carry trade/arbitrage opportunity provided them by the Fed.

The answer to this conundrum is to withdraw government programs that support lenders and borrowers who are essentially bankrupt. It would be nice to see individual borrowers pay off their loans, but since most of the debt created in the boom phase originated from home equity, the continuing decline of home prices makes that a moot point.

Likewise, while it would be nice to see banks raise more capital, sell off bad loans and assets, and clear their balance sheets, they have been reluctant to do that, waiting as it were for more government bailouts. However, the amount of problem loans related to commercial real estate  and residential real estate development is huge and much of what they lent on is fundamentally unsound because of overbuilding.

In an attempt to keep this debt rolling forward in the hope that the next cycle or inflation would bail lenders and borrowers out, policies such as TARP, HAMP, HARP, HAFA, extend and pretend, delay and pray, mark-to-make-believe, bailouts of Fannie and Freddie, lowered lending requirements, massive Fed purchases of mortgage backed securities known as "toxic assets," and many others have tried to keep the debt barge afloat. It hasn't worked.

If it had worked, as the Fed and the government believes it should have, then we would see credit expanding, money supply growing, asset prices rising, consumer consumption increasing, and jobs going up and unemployment going down.

Presently the FDIC has 775 banks listed as "problem institutions." Bank closings are at 73 this year, and at 238 since 2008. Lending declined for the seventh straight month (accounting changes created an anomaly that falsely indicated an increase last month).

The combined percentage of residential loans in foreclosure or at least one payment past due was 14.01% last quarter. Morgan Stanley just reported that this "shadow inventory" could be as high as 8 million homes and take 47 months to liquidate, assuming current rates experienced by REO departments. Morgan Stanley's is the highest estimate I have seen. Others are 3.5 million. 4.7 million. and 5.5 million. Whichever number you pick, it still high.

CRE debt is getting critical for most banks. This is the main reason credit is frozen, excess reserves are high, and money supply is shrinking. Between 2010 and 2014, about $1.4 trillion in commercial real estate loans are expected to reach the end of their terms. CRE asset values are still falling.

Studies by McKinsey Global Institute and research by Romer and Reinhardt show that history is not kind in cycles with resulting high debt: on the average it can take six to seven years to deleverage, and can take as much as 25% off the top of GDP. It is painful and unavoidable, but understandable. This cycle is the biggest cycle in history and debt reached historic proportions, worldwide. Understand that mortgage backed securities, both residential and commercial, were distributed worldwide to banks, pension funds, insurance companies, hedge funds, and endowment funds.

How we could we fix this problem:

1. Require banks to mark-to-market the assets securing their loans, and raise more capital or go out of business.

2. Remove federally funded or guaranteed residential mortgage lending. This would include Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the FHA.

3. End all Fed lending programs created at the beginning of the crisis, such as TARP.

4. End all programs to help home mortgage borrowers, such as HAMP and HAFA.

5. Require the Fed to auction its portfolio of mortgage backed securities.

6. Establish a program similar to the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) to quickly dispose of the assets of failed banks.

7. End tax policies that require borrowers to incur phantom income as a result of real estate debt relief.

8. End taxes on interest and dividend income to encourage savings.

9. Immediately raise the Fed Funds rate.

Many of these solutions seem counter-intuitive, but one must question the path our government has taken to stimulate a recovery. We need to look at this crisis in an entirely different way: the boom was the real problem and the bust is the cure. The harm was done in the boom phase as a Fed induced credit expansion and various government programs misdirected capital to businesses that, but for this government action, would not have been otherwise profitable. In economic terms this is called "malinvestment."

As in all booms, reality, usually in the form of a tightening of money supply by the Fed, brings asset value back to the ground, and even under the ground as we find these malinvestments unprofitable. That is what we are seeing now. The bust phase is a process of redirecting capital from these failed investments back into more profitable ventures. It is obvious that large amounts of capital will be lost. But by liquidating these bad assets, banks eventually go back to normal, credit loosens, people save more money because of financial uncertainty and to reduce their debt, thus creating the new capital needed for a true economic expansion.

If this liquidation phase is thwarted, as we have seen, we get stagnation and zombie banks. This is what Japan has experienced for the past 20 years.

Take the bitter pill, endure the inevitable pain, and we will recover quicker.


Insights about China and Nicaragua

Posted: 27 May 2010 04:17 PM PDT

In a recent edition of The Daily Reckoning, Bill Bonner observed, "The world turned against them at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. But if the world turns long enough, it comes back to where it began." He was writing about India. But he could have been writing about China...or Nicaragua...or any one of a number of emerging markets.

In the next 1,618 words, I'll share few insights about both China and Nicaragua. These insights share no particular connection to one another, other than the observation that economies do not stand still. The "emerging markets" of one generation are the "developed markets" of the next generation, and vice versa.

Change is the one of the great constants in investing. Opportunity makes its nest like a tramp pigeon, never in the same place for very long. There is always something new happening. Asked about his worldview, Mark Mobius, the famous emerging markets investor, once replied: "Things change... You know, that's it in a nutshell." And in this swirl of change lies some big chances at profits.

For example, last year China passed the US as the world's largest market for automobiles. First time ever that's happened. There were 13.5 million vehicles sold in China last year - a 40% increase. There are now over 40 million vehicles in China. According to the China Economic Review, over 2,000 cars roll onto the road every day in Beijing alone.

China's steps seem to mirror what happened in the US in the 1950s. China wants to use roads to knit the country together and open up trade between its distant provinces and cities. To that end, the Chinese are laying highways like nobody's business. By the end of 2008, China had an estimated 60,000 km of highway. The US has 75,000 km. Over the next few years, China plans to have 85,000 km of roads.

This is having some amazing effects. For instance, China recently built a highway from Lhasa, Tibet, which runs all the way to the Nepali border. Along this road is the city of Shigatse, a formerly sleepy town where tourists may stop to gaze at ancient monasteries on their way to Mount Everest. But today, it is also a place where people get rich running freight services along the 515-mile highway.

An Economist correspondent traveling this way recently wrote:

In the past few years, hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent improving the road. This has included covering its gravel sections with asphalt, which has greatly facilitated cross-border trade. On the Lhasa-Shigatse section, which winds along a valley lined by sand dunes and spectacular peaks, Han Chinese from the interior have opened little Sichuanese restaurants catering to the lorry drivers.

The easy mixing of peoples and the freedom to pursue their own ends leads people to trade. Business expands. The quality of life rises. The roads are doing their work. The cars and trucks are coming. Where are the opportunities?

The first thing most people think of is the automakers. GM, for all its struggles, is having no trouble selling cars in China. Sales were up 67% in 2009, to a record 1.83 million units. Other carmakers are having similar success. The problem here is it doesn't make much sense to buy, say, GM, because you like its car business in China. There is too much else going on there.

I'm more interested in investment ideas that are a step removed from actually building the cars. All those cars will eat up a lot of metals of all kinds, for example. They will also burn a lot of fuel.

Dig deeper and you'll find China loves methanol as an alternative fuel to blend with gasoline to lower emissions. China blends more than a billion gallons of methanol in gasoline annually. And its appetite for methanol is growing more than 16% a year. Methanol, made from coal or natural gas, is China's ethanol. Such thinking led us to our methanol play, Methanex (NASDAQ:MEOH).

I recommended this stock one year ago to the subscribers of Capital & Crisis, when US methanol prices hit a temporary low of $200 a ton. Today, the price is about $350 a ton. Not surprisingly, therefore, the MEOH stock price has more than doubled during the last year.

But the stock is still relatively cheap. At current methanol prices, Methanex could generate over $800 million in EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). The total enterprise value - or the theoretical price to buy the whole company on the market - is only $2.9 billion. So it trades for only 3.6 times this potential EBITDA. That's pretty cheap.

Another way to look at it is to think about replacement costs - or what it would cost you to build Methanex from scratch. Methanex trades for just under $400/tonne of methanol capacity. That's less than replacement cost of about $700/tonne. There is still a lot of upside here.

Shifting to another continent, and another type of observation entirely, change is also unfolding rapidly in Nicaragua.

Nicaragua has always been a place of intrigue, mostly because of geography. Before the Panama Canal, this was the place where people thought of building a canal. As a result, American involvement in Nicaragua goes way back. Militarily, the first Marines landed here in 1912 and occupied it until 1933. And the Somoza regime, a dictatorship created and supported by the US, ran the country until the Sandinistas took over in 1979. (If you are interested in learning more, I encourage you to read Nicaragua: Living in the Shadow of the Eagle by Thomas Walker.)

As a result of the Sandinista era, most Americans probably have a poor opinion of Nicaragua. But it is a beautiful country with its volcanoes, lakes and a lush tropical climate. The people are friendly, and Nicaragua is safe to travel through. The food is great and so are the beaches. It's also a young country with more than half of the population under 25 years old. (Nicaragua also makes one of the world's best rums, Flor de Caña - "flower of the [sugar] cane." I enjoyed it neat and in the national drink, el macua, made with guava juice.)

I recently visited Nicaragua and saw a bit of the country - Leon, Managua and Granada - before settling in at Rancho Santana. The latter is a development project on a spectacular 3,000-acre property on the Pacific Coast near Rivas. Stretches of it remind me of Big Sur with its dramatic coastline.

The sad thing is that Nicaragua ought to be a rich country. Nicaragua was once a prosperous place of some renown. In the 19th century, for example, Granada was the most prominent city in Central America, a rich trading city holding down a key spot in global commerce. But the country's economic trajectory took a turn for the worse during the 20th century.

Nevertheless, the country's rich natural resources remain. Nicaragua has lots of good land for growing things. The soil supports a wide variety of crops and livestock. Coffee in the north. Bananas, papayas, mangoes, sugar cane and more grow everywhere else. Nicaragua is also the largest country in Central America and among the least densely populated.

Nicaragua has another special resource: It is among the most water-rich countries in the world. (I've been making my way through Steven Solomon's new book Water, which is a fat tome on the history of water from ancient times to the present day). In a world where water scarcity is an issue, Latin America stands out for its water wealth. It has 28% of the world's renewable water and only 6% of its population. Solomon writes that the "super Water-Have countries such as Brazil, Russia, Canada, Panama and Nicaragua [have] far more water than their populations can ever use."

Lake Nicaragua, one of the largest lakes in the world, is the future water supply of Central America. There are many rivers and lakes, which make useful internal waterways. And Nicaragua has access to both the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Nicaraguan waters are also great for fishing.

Nicaragua holds great potential for wind, geothermal - from volcanoes all along the western half of the country - and hydroelectric power. In fact, Rancho Santana is trying to become self-sufficient in energy. There are ridges there where the wind blows constantly. A wind feasibility study done there lately scored as high as it could. The conditions are ideal. Finally, Nicaragua has great timber resources, as well as mineral resources such as silver and gold.

Present-day Nicaragua also illustrates one of the global trends we've been examining during the last few months: the "penthouse gypsy" trend. This term refers to people with money who go where they (and their money) are treated best, wherever in the world that may be. Increasingly, they are no longer in the US or Europe. It may be hard to believe, but there are plenty of penthouse gypsies down in Rancho Santana.

Why not? They are able to diversify out of the US, where tax rates are surely going much higher. They get cheap, stunning real estate. Property taxes are hardly anything. You can live very well down here on not much money. I have a good friend who moved to Nicaragua five years ago for this reason.

Most Americans worry about confiscation of property. But that risk seems remote after talking to people here. Tourism is the No. 1 cash cow of what is still a poor country. Even Ortega doesn't want to do anything to upset that cash flow. (He owns several hotels.)

As far as enforcement of contracts, the IMF and World Bank rank Nicaragua third among all Latin American and Caribbean countries. Foreign direct investment in Nicaragua is soaring - up fourfold since 2000.

I can't say my trip to Nicaragua yielded a hot stock tip or big investment insight. But I learned a lot about a part of the world I hadn't explored before. Hopefully, my notes here help you see the opportunities that are out there in this great big world - if only we look at it with fresh eyes.

Chris Mayer
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

Similar Posts:


US Government to Kill Its Own Economy

Posted: 27 May 2010 04:11 PM PDT

Hey, is this a great recovery...or what?

Stocks fell again yesterday. The Dow went down 69 points, closing below 10,000. Gold rose $15...closing above $1,200.

The two are still $8,800 apart. But give them time. They've been working their way closer for the last ten years. They'll get there...

Single family house prices fell for the 6th month in a row, reports The Washington Post.

And get this: "Private pay shrinks to historic lows as government payouts rise," says USA Today.

This is the big story. As a share of personal income, never before has the private sector contributed so little. Thank god for the government. Without those checks from the feds, we'd all be broke.

The story as told by USA Today:

"Paychecks from private business shrank to their smallest share of personal income in US history during the first quarter of this year, a USA Today analysis of government data finds.

"At the same time, government-provided benefits - from Social Security, unemployment insurance, food stamps and other programs - rose to a record high during the first three months of 2010.

"Those records reflect a long-term trend accelerated by the recession and the federal stimulus program to counteract the downturn. The result is a major shift in the source of personal income from private wages to government programs.

"The trend is not sustainable, says University of Michigan economist Donald Grimes. Reason: The federal government depends on private wages to generate income taxes to pay for its ever-more-expensive programs. Government-generated income is taxed at lower rates or not at all, he says. 'This is really important,' Grimes says."

That's the trouble, isn't it? The feds don't really have any money. They don't make anything. They don't create any wealth. So they can only send us checks by taking the money from us - one way or another.

And that, dear reader, is the story of the most important trend of our time. The feds are taking a bigger and bigger share of the economy. And the bigger the share they get, the less the rest of it is worth. Because an economy run by politicians and bureaucrats is not a healthy economy. It's a sick economy...it limps along. It wheezes and coughs. And if the trend towards more and more federal control continues...the economy finally dies.

If you want the government to take care of you, said Jefferson, "you will soon want bread." He didn't say it exactly that way. We improved it.

The feds don't make decisions on the basis of fair play and rational economic choices. Instead, they're political choices - such as bailing out the big banks because they are said to be "too big to fail," or bailing out the big auto companies because they employ too many voters, or bailing out the mortgage industry because too many people would lose their houses if the mortgage industry were allowed to go whither it should.

Even in the best of times an investment is a risky thing. Sometimes it will produce a positive return (above the real cost of funds). Sometimes it won't.

Imagine what happens when decisions are made by functionaries, political appointees and GS-12s? Capital is then allocated to the wrong projects for the wrong reasons...which result in the wrong outcomes.

Bad economic decisions produce bad economic results. Bad economic results lower the value of capital assets...and make almost everyone in the economy poorer.

We say, "almost everyone," because the government's employees, lobbyists, and contractors are in a class apart. They are the ruling party and its apparatchiks. While everyone else gets poorer, they get richer.

And more thoughts...

"Tax increases. Spending cuts." That's the name of the game in Europe.

The OECD is calling for them. The IMF is requiring them. Politicians are promising them.

Just yesterday, Italy came forward with $30 billion worth of spending cuts.

Reading the paper, you might think Europe's leaders have the matter under control. Every day seems to bring fresh promises. But remember, these are the same people who failed to keep within Europe's fiscal targets 57% of the time - even when the going was good.

How will they do with their backs against the wall? Better, most likely. But not good enough. The euro-feds will make plenty of gestures. But in the end, it just won't make sense for people to give up present benefits in order to respect promises made by a generation of spendthrift politicians to a ruthless bunch of speculating bankers. The political left, which is leading the opposition to 'austerity' measures, will become more and more attractive to more and more voters. It will be harder and harder to cut spending.

This will force governments in the direction of least resistance.

They will "print money...go bust...and go to war," says Marc Faber. "We are doomed."

*** Oil is still spilling into the Gulf of Mexico at an unknown rate.

"Plug the damn hole," says the nation's chief executive to his aides. Why does he bother? His aides don't know anything about plugging oil leaks under the ocean. And those people who do know something about it have been unable to fix the leak.

Mr. Obama is not only America's president. He also presides over the biggest single user of oil in the world - the US military. The pentagon uses twice as much oil as the entire nation of Ireland. It sends soldiers in oil-burning airplanes to places of no apparent importance where they drive around in oil-burning machines for no apparent reason.

Naturally, oil becomes not just another commodity, but a strategic commodity...worth fighting for. Then, foreign wars use up the oil they were expected to protect.

But geopolitics is far beyond our understanding...and even farther out of our range of interest. We will just observe that the law of diminishing returns applies to just about everything. The farther offshore the roughnecks go...the deeper the sea and the higher the waves...the more the costs, the greater the risks and the lower the marginal returns. The return from Deepwater Horizon must be starkly negative...

The farther afield US armies go, too, the greater the costs, the higher the risks, and the lower the marginal returns.

"Why not just buy oil on the open market?"

Well, it's clear you don't know anything about geopolitics either, dear reader...don't you know that our enemies might try to cut us off from vital oil supplies? That's why Germany and Japan lost WWII! We were able to cut of their fuel...

"But weren't Germany and Japan fighting for access to oil? Didn't their politicians say they had to invade Poland...and the Philippines...to protect their vital supplies?"

No...they were aggressors. They were bad people...

"But if they hadn't been the aggressors they wouldn't have been bad people, right?"

That's right...

"Then, we wouldn't have cut off their access to oil!"

Oh, never mind. You'll never understand geopolitics, will you?

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

Similar Posts:


Gold Seeker Closing Report: Gold and Silver End Mixed While Stocks and Oil Surge Higher

Posted: 27 May 2010 04:00 PM PDT

Gold climbed $5.13 to as high as $1218.23 in Asia before it fell back in London to as low as $1205.60 by about 8:30AM EST and then rallied back higher for most of the morning in New York, but it then fell back off in the last couple of hours of trade and ended with a loss of 0.05%. Silver climbed to as high as $18.548 by about 11:15AM EST before it also fell back off into the close, but it still ended with a gain of 0.82%.


Miners Don't Gotta Mine

Posted: 27 May 2010 03:59 PM PDT

Here is a question to begin this Friday's Daily Reckoning: can there be financial stability in Europe if the assets of Europe's banks are the liabilities of Europe's governments and some of Europe's governments are going broke?

We'll get back to that question a bit later. But warming to today's task, we'll look at the mega-rally in U.S. stocks overnight and the big fight back/smack down by the leader of the nation's bureaucratic class.

But first, there's nothing like the smell of a short-squeeze in the morning, is there? Slipstream Trader Murray Dawes was calling for it all week. And he was busy getting into trades to profit from it should it arrive. Overnight it seems to have arrived with monster truck force.

The big blue chip Dow stocks were up 284 points, or 2.85%. But in the tech and small cap sectors, the gains were even bigger. For example, the Russel 2000 index of U.S. small cap stocks was up 4.34%.

That's a good day's work. It reminded us of the old adage that small caps tend to lead the market up when things are bullish and fall hardest when they are bearish. With that in mind, take a look at the chart below.

The ASX/200 vs. U.S. Small Caps and Blue Chips

The ASX/200 vs. U.S. Small Caps and Blue Chips

Australian Small-Cap Investigator editor Kris Sayce and your editor were talking about the advisability of making new recommendations in a market like this earlier in the week. Ultimately, along with Diggers and Drillers editor Alex Cowie, we decided that they ought to publish their best investment ideas regardless of the market. This means you focus on good companies - but you're fully conscious the market you're investing is dangerous.

Both Kris and Alex published their new recommendations last night. And according to the chart above, the timing could be good. Since mid-April Aussie stocks have fallen further and risen less fast than U.S. counterparts. The chart above includes Thursday's U.S. trading session. But depending on how today's session goes in Australia, that little green line at the bottom could be a lot higher.

Both Kris and Alex spent a lot of time in their respective reports talking about risk because there' so much of it going around. You've got political risk in Europe. Geopolitical risk in North Korea. Sovereign risk here in Australia. And that's all on top of the normal risk you take as a common stock investor in public companies engaged in enterprises with inherently unpredictable outcomes.

To be perfectly candid, with so many external forces whipsawing market prices, it is very difficult to be an investor in this market. It is more of a traders and speculators market. In our own newsletter, Australian Wealth Gameplan, we have a few core positions leveraged to a rising gold price and a falling Aussie dollar. Our value investing sleuth Greg Canavan pointed out earlier this week than in a market like this, the best strategy is to buy companies selling at a discount to book value to give yourself a margin of safety.

So, from the speculator to the bargain hunter to the generally risk averse (conscious of the possibility of the systemic collapse of leveraged global financial system), the market requires you to make a decision. Doing nothing is a decision, too. Yes, yes, it sounds post-modern, that inaction is a form of action. But in financial terms, being in cash because you prefer liquidity is a position too.

Our view is that the sense of relief over Europe's sovereign risks is fundamentally stupid. Or ignorant. Or obtuse. Or wilful self-deception. The banks of Europe are stuffed with government debt. And when one man's asset is another man's liability, both parties are the poorer if the debtor cannot realistically repay.

His credits must be written down. His debts must be restructured. And the public balance sheet must be shrunk the same way private and non-financial corporate balance sheets have shrunk. Liquidate the bad investments and move on to a frontier of economic possibilities. That's the future. For the present, we seem mired in the past.

"Whatever yardstick you care to choose," writes Edmund Conway in the U.K.'s Telegraph, "share-price moves, the rates at which banks lend to each other, measures of volatility - we are now in a similar position to 2008. Europe's problem is that the unfortunate game of pass-the-parcel came at just the wrong moment. It resulted in a hefty extra amount of debt being lumped on to its member states' balance sheets when they were least-equipped to deal with it."

So what if Europe's problems haven't really gone away? Does that mean rallies like this should be sold before the next leg of the Global Financial Crisis, where national governments really do default on their debt? And in the meantime, Europe's panic attack has obscured very real structural problems in the U.S. and Chinese economies, both related to housing prices and the role they play with bank collateral.

Hmm. If it turns out the global balance sheet in the age of globalisation and securitisation was over-leveraged and debt-laden, then the next round of the GFC is going to make the first one look like a tea-party.

Not THAT kind of tea-party, although it's fair to see that when a nation's state finances collapse, the probability for social instability goes up a lot. Inflation and warfare are old bedfellows and campaigners. They know how to have a bad time.

Yet all of this might seem terribly far-fetched or unlikely to policy makers in Canberra and miners in Perth. The two continue to publicly quarrel in front of international capital markets to the detriment of Australia's reputation as a safe destination for foreign investments. In order to save Australia, it was first necessary to castrate the mining industry.

Speaking to the Senate yesterday, Treasury Secretary Ken Henry knocked backed claims that the mining industry saved Australia from the worst of the GFC (which he apparently thinks is over). He said, "Suggestions that the Australian mining industry saved the Australian economy from recession are curious to say the least…. These statements are not supported by facts."

We couldn't find a quotation in which the Treasurer gave credit to Canberra for accounting for up to 60% of Australia's exports in the last two years, by dollar value. But if he was referring to, say, the volume of words belched out by the government giving itself credit for being so smart, he's probably right.

Really the most worrying words the Treasurer uttered, in our mind, were these: "Frankly, there is more than enough investment in train in the mining sector. The limit is access to labour and the capital needed to undertake the projects." He was apparently responding to the claim that the new resource tax will lead to less investment, not more, as both he and the government claim.

The one factor in all this that Dr. Henry and the government seem to be leaving out is free will. Project decisions in the mining industry are not compulsory. The miners can't walk away from projects that are already producing. This accounts for some of the fury over a tax that is retrospective.

But it's as if the government believes many many mining projects will go ahead regardless of the policy…just because. As if the companies will stop making investment decisions based on the rate of return and the cost of the capital. They'll just keep digging and drilling because that's what they do, and if they don't the government won't have any profits to tax.

Beavers must dam. Fish gotta swim. Birds gotta fly. But miners don't gotta mine in Australia.

In the real world of the private sector, decisions about what to produce are not determined by abstract public policy goals, which are themselves based on personal prejudices about the "appropriate" level of profit.

In the real word, final investment decisions are determined by what consumers want and whether a firm can deliver what the market wants at a profit. There is no requirement that Australia export iron ore or coal because it has them. If the miners can't do it a profit that satisfies shareholders, they won't do it at all, at least not here.

Perhaps that's what the government wants in the end, to drive the mining companies from Australia, but not before confiscating as much revenue as possible. Perhaps the government wants the mining companies to hand back all their leases and turn the business of producing mineral wealth over to the people who really know how to do it: public servants and elected officials.

We'll see how that works out. But it's looking more and more like an international capital strike against Australia is a real possibility. For one, there's a brewing credit crunch coming from an inevitable sovereign debt default in Europe.

Secondly, Australia's public officials are looking anything but reasonable and sensible in the court of international capital market opinion. They are looking like grasping, blundering, bullying, but well-meaning dunderheads who have demonstrated a first-class ignorance of how wealth is created. The Rudd government has wanted to lead the world on a lot of issues. It's well on its way.

Dan Denning
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

Similar Posts:


Easy Money, Hard Truths?

Posted: 27 May 2010 02:36 PM PDT


Via Pension Pulse.

I want to share with you comments on my last entry on a pension chief's exit. A senior pension fund manager emailed me with some important observations which I will share with you (some comments are edited out):

Here are some things you may want to consider in shaping your argument:

I believe that economies of scale are important in asset management so having public sector related funds operate at arm's length on competitive terms is a good thing.

Moving from a fund to a supplier is a bit much, but what drove the guy out is problematic as well.

The public seems more worked up about paying internal managers for performance than paying external managers double or triple regardless of performance

This year, my internal team added 600 million over public market benchmarks and may get 10 million (in addition to about 10 in wages and benefits); external managers lost 500 million relative to market and their fees are related to assets and amount to 120 million. Want to guess what the headlines will be?

On benchmarks my landing spot is that the simplest way to implement a policy is with index funds. Return will be index - implementation costs.

If you run an active program, incremental return on incremental risk has to be attractive.

Most of the time incremental risk is actually insignificant or negative. A good active manager tries to improve on market return/risk and cap weighted markets are not quite risk efficient. Consequently, active risk tends to be negatively correlated with the market.

Benchmarks for unlisted assets are tough. Has nothing to do with fraud in most cases.

In any case the principle has to be that it will do better that the listed assets it displaces. Private equity should improve on listed equity adjusted for leverage.
For infrastructure and timber we know that the unlevered return is typically between stocks and bonds once the market becomes reasonably efficient. I think it should do better than some combination of stocks and RRBs.

Hedge funds are a hodge podge. Few can deliver uncorrelated return on risk. The HFRX usually tracks global equities except for 2000-2003

Annual value added does not tell you much. Good active programs can easily be negative 1 year out of 4. My experience is that longer periods are better.

The 4 year rule was chosen by most funds because that is all CRA allowed. I proposed a perpetual inventory method over ten years ago. It now appears that this may fly as long as the balance is at risk.

I feel that something like 5 cents per dollar of net value added over net index return is fair to clients and managers if incremental risk is insignificant.

Typically, if you can do something for x internally, you pay 3x or 5x externally.

If the public really prefers to pay more for what it cannot see, vs less for what it can see, more power too them.

My goal is to squeeze margin out of total asset management and increase net return to my clients.
No one care who gets paid what as a percent of a reasonable price of toothpaste. All we consider is whether the toothpaste does the job. Why should we care in pension management.

If I can deliver an extra 1 or 2 % over market with an all in total pension asset management cost of 30 bps my clients should be well served, and that is the only criterion that should matter.

But it seems that doing so will get you vilified by all sides: you make more than the Prime Minister (so the public thinks you are overpaid), and you cut into the external manager industry income.

And he added :

We have been arguing over comp since Plato.

As I recall he thought philosopher kings were the most deserving. I am not sure what the right answer is.


However, there is a market for talent out there, and it works reasonably well. I have to compete with what external managers pay as well as what the public plans pay.

Like it or not, comp systems have to hold on to people in bad times and good. There will always be some optionality involved.

The comparisons at any point in time are not always very easy.

Benchmarks are one issue.

Maturity of portfolios (J-curve effects) can be important.

Legacy portfolios when you have a new manager coming in.

All these things average out over longer periods.

The smell test is net investment cost in bps. For a 60-100 billion fund that should be in the 30-40 bps range. Bonuses usually are a very small part of that.
I have financed all the corporate remedial investment in operations and investment out of a 40 million cut in fees so far.

Yet the argument has not been over fees or net costs but over whether I should be paid more or less than a mediocre hockey player. If I sound cynical it is because I have become so.

We need more focus on the forest, less on individual trees.

The comments above come from one of the wisest people in the pension industry. He is absolutely right to say that too much focus goes on internal compensation and not on external fees.

At the end of the day, what counts is returns net of all fees. If you can bring assets internally, deliver alpha and cut a huge chunk of external manager fees, then all power to you. Moreover, if you're adding value over a long period using appropriate benchmarks in all asset classes, then you deserve to be paid for this added value.

What gets under my skin is when I see pension fund managers getting paid big bonuses for what is essentially leveraged beta. The leverage can come internally through alpha strategies using derivatives or externally through hedge fund or private equity funds taking huge leveraged bets on markets. It doesn't matter where it comes from - at the end of the day leveraged beta is beta, not alpha, and we shouldn't pay big bonuses for it. Quite simply, benchmarks must reflect the risks taken in each investment activity.

As far as costs are concerned, the senior pension fund manager is right, the smell test is investment cost in basis points. All public funds should report these costs clearly in their annual reports.

Finally, take the time to read David Einhorn's op-ed article in the NYT, Easy Money, Hard Truths. Some have criticized Mr. Einhorn for "blatant gold book talking", but he makes several important observations and asks a very simple question:

At what level of government debt and future commitments does government default go from being unthinkable to inevitable, and how does our government think about that risk?

As Congress weighs a pension bailout, I fear that they're past the point of thinking about that risk. In my mind, it's crystal clear. Financial oligarchs and their political puppets are doing everything in their power to reflate risk assets hoping that it will translate into moderate (or severe) inflation for the economic system. Their biggest fear is debt deflation, and if their gambles don't work, they're going to get get it sooner than they think.


Will The USD Be Replaced By The SDR Or The CNY As The Next Reserve Currency?

Posted: 27 May 2010 02:32 PM PDT


Jim O'Neill, who did not make any friends within the bear community earlier today, has written an interesting paper on the IMF's Special Drawing Rights, and whether this hypernational currency can ever become a reserve currency as is, and/or with the CNY as a constituent member. While O'Neill as usual focuses on the angle of the "next paradigm" BRICs, and how they will increasingly dominate global economics, he does pose an important question: with the dollar likely to suffer the side effects of either hyperdeflation, hyperinflation, or hyperstagflation, will the next reserve currency be a diluted melange of other flawed fiat constructs (i.e., the SDR), or the currency of the one country, which for all its flaws, still has the cleanest balance sheet backing its own fiat construct. On the other hand, the question of whether this analysis is moot to begin with, and the world will revert to the gold standard as the ongoing crisis of confidence in all paper money flares up, is not raised even once... We wonder (not really) what Jim O'Neill would have to say on that particular issue.

Here are the main bullets:

  • The issue of the ‘international reserve currency’ and the possible role of the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDR) has moved from obscurity to the centre of discussions about the future.
  • Given China’s importance in terms of its share of world trade, the CNY should now be part of the SDR. The case for including it can only become more obvious as this decade progresses.
  • However, actually including the CNY as a constituent of the SDR is likely to remain a challenge without the CNY becoming more widely used internationally, including as a reserve asset.
  • The case for including other BRIC currencies in the SDR, especially the RUB, is also likely to become stronger over the coming decade.
  • Although the Dollar will probably not be as dominant in 2020 as it is today, it is far from clear that it needs to be replaced by the SDR—or by anything else—as the main reserve currency.
  • For the SDR to be attractive to private users, it will need to include the CNY and possibly other BRIC currencies. However, this alone would not guarantee that the SDR would be more attractive to private investors.

The paper is a critical follow up to anyone who found Albert Edward's earlier analysis of collapsing global FX reserves relevant.

Full paper:

 

AttachmentSize
GS SDR Currencies.pdf319.78 KB


This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Guest Post: New to FINREG - Financial Equalization Proposal Gaining Momentum

Posted: 27 May 2010 02:06 PM PDT


Submitted by Jack

New to FINREG - Financial Equalization Proposal Gaining Momentum

Thus far unreported, but quietly gaining momentum in the polls is the provision for Financial Equalization.  Spurred on by the recent announcement of the SEC's inquiry into Goldman Sachs, legislators and soccer moms are gathering behind a system proponents claim will finally bring fairness and equality to the financial system. 
The SEC investigation into Goldman has become a rallying point, a prime example of the corruption and inequality of the financial system. 

At the heart of the matter is both the "amount" and "accuracy" of information in the possession of certain Wall Street firms.  The Government is attacking Goldman for its participating in prominent hedge fund Paulson & Co's recently disclosed theft from the hapless counterparties ACA Capital Management and IKB Deutsche Industriebank.  The facts clearly display how Paulson's alleged "comprehensive diligence" into areas such as the "economy, housing market, and specifically the credit quality of the ABACUS 2007-AC1 CDO" gave them a material, unfair, and in the opinion of many, criminal advantage over the counterparties.  Paulson, Goldman and their cronies have made the claim that it was common practice for broker-dealers to seek input from market participants when assembling synthetic collateralized debt obligations (CDO's).  Goldman and Paulson have dug themselves into a hole here and set a standard for which they do not want to be held.  Their idea of "common practice" comes right back to bite them in the ass, for Paulson's illicit practice of gathering and analyzing relevant information was certainly not common practice - and rightfully so. 

It is being argued that Goldman had an obligation to inform ACA and IKB "directly and explicitly" that their counterparty not only (1) understood the properties and functions of CDO's in general, but furthermore (2) had actively assessed the value of this particular CDO based on the probability of various cash flow scenarios. 

Unfortunately, I think many of my humanitarian brethren are still failing to see the forest for the trees.  Requiring explicit disclosure to ACA and IKB or other counterparties in similar scenarios is not the solution.  First of all, these companies obey the letter of the law and not the spirit, putting the explicit disclosure in the same documents containing the structure and risks of the investment itself.  The very same documents they already know their exploited customers don't read!  Secondly, even if the SEC required the disclosure to be sufficiently conspicuous, painted across a life-size cutout of Nancy Pelosi kissing Lindsey Lohan for example, what would the disclosure really accomplish?  The majority of investors and public money managers are honest, hardworking Americans - not some arrogant group of yuppies with the leisure to sink hours of time into research.  Requiring nuanced diligence of investments panders to the plutocrats of this society who garnered the education, intelligence, and experience necessarily to evaluate these securities at the expense of the common man.  Think of the massive inequality, the enormous burden on both corporations and individuals if Investors, individual or institutional, had to restrict themselves to investments they understand in order to get a fair shake in the markets.  I loathe to even speculate what the overall cost to the system might be in such a dystopia.  It simply cannot be allowed.       

Enter, running, the proposal for Financial Equalization.  In a stroke of brilliance, legislative aides have designed a system that prevents further abuses of information asymmetry without the enormous costs associated with a pervasive adoption of research and diligence.  Given that the majority of investors and investment firms have neither the resources, desire, nor capacity for understanding basic classes of financial products (Stocks, Bonds, Derivatives), nor their individual investments within such categories, the logical solution is to "equalize" every firm and individual with even the slightest capacity for abuse of this type of information.  Individuals will be assessed on a sliding scale and categorized based on their potential danger to the fairness and equality of the marketplace.  While the full equalization criteria are still being discussed, there are already several items on the table.  One example, individuals demonstrating a potential for abuse through "inference and logical reasoning" will be required to attend weekly seminars on topics such as "astrology", "faith healing", and "healthcare re-imbursement".  Those with a tendency to analyze events in the global marketplace and see the larger mosaic shall have all channels restricted save the FOX business channel, and so on and so forth. 

Most importantly, the proposal will also firmly establish that any transaction in which one party gains advantage over another will constitute prima facie evidence of a violation of the equalization guidelines.  With this measure in place we can avoid situations akin to the current spectacle, where these pompous firms have the audacity to stand there and debate the case on points of law.  Fortunately, even before the equalization legislature becomes law, these modern day robber barons will find no refuge in the law, as the judicial branch has also donned the colors of equality and anti-elitism.   Chief Justice Roberts demonstrated his firmly anti-elitist position last week when he asked the poignant and thought -provoking question "What is the difference between email and a pager?"  Clearly, a scathing and well deserved critique of the technocrats and their other erudite ilk.  With all three branches of government and the majority of Americans lined up behind this proposal, the country seems poised to take an important step toward truly becoming a land of tolerance, acceptance, and equality - by finally kicking out those greedy capitalist pigs. 


‘Top Kill’ Effort Must Succeed or Else…

Posted: 27 May 2010 02:00 PM PDT

By Rick Ackerman, Rick's Picks

We may all be breathing a sigh of relief by the time you read this, but it remained uncertain at press time whether British Petroleum's efforts to plug a massive oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico would succeed. Earlier in the day, the company began pumping a heavy fluid called "mud" into the damaged well, but the process was temporarily halted because the high-powered flow of oil and gas from the well was causing too much of the mud to escape. BP said such delays had been expected but that they hoped to resume the sealing operation by late tonight. The effort came amidst reports that oil has been gushing from the well at a rate much greater than what BP had first estimated. The company originally said that about 5,000 barrels of oil were escaping per day, but the latest estimates suggest that the true number is somewhere between 12,000 and 19,000 barrels. Converted into gallons, that implies that as much as 760,000 gallons of oil per day are flowing into the Gulf.

Oil spill 'top kill' procedure diagram

Last week, we linked at Rick's Picks a very scary article from rense.com that said the "top kill" procedure being used to plug the well was the world's last hope to get the disaster under control. The author, who sounded like he knew a thing or two about drilling platforms, explained that abrasive material contained in the gushing oil could eventually widen the well-hole so that virtually unlimited quantities of oil and explosive methane would be released into the water and atmosphere. We would strongly suggest that you read the article to understand what is at stake if BP's effort fails. The only alternative at that point would be to drill an additional well to relieve the pressure. This procedure is already under way, but it will still take another two months to complete. During that time, nature could take a catastrophic course on its own, according to the author, who was identified only by the initials "SHR". If BP reports that the "top kill" attempt has failed, it will be grave news indeed for Planet Earth.

(Get this commentary and a free Hidden Pivot forecast each day via email.)


Rick's Picks is a trading newsletter for stock, gold, silver and mini-indexes. All trades are based on the proprietary Hidden Pivot technical analysis method.

© Rick Ackerman and www.rickackerman.com, 2010. |
No comments yet |

More articles from Rick Ackerman….



Did JP Morgan Assassinate Lehman Brothers?

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:57 PM PDT

By Jeff Nielson, Bullion Bulls Canada

In the fall of 2008, global markets suffered their worst collapse in nearly 80 years. Regular readers will be familiar with my own position on these events: this was a "crisis" engineered by Wall Street Oligarchs, for two reasons. First, with all their paper empires on the verge of imploding as their multi-trillion Ponzi-schemes blew-up, they needed to frighten Washington politicians to give in to their blackmail demands: a $10 trillion bail-out, composed of direct hand-outs, unlimited zero-interest "loans", and "guaranteeing" Wall Street's derivatives 'black hole'.

The other part of Wall Street's agenda was to destroy commodities markets, by manipulating these markets into the largest commodities-collapse in the history of human commerce. In that respect, their machinations were rumored to focus upon two targets. Hank "Bazooka" Paulson purportedly went to CalPERS, the world's largest pension fund (and a huge commodities-bull in 2008) and begged them to suddenly and dramatically bail-out of their positions because, said Paulson, soaring commodity prices threatened to destroy the U.S. economy via hyperinflation.

Their other vehicle for sabotaging commodities markets (according to rumors) was to assassinate Lehman Brothers, since it held one of the largest (and most-leveraged) commodities portfolios on the planet. The latter "tool" was of far more importance to Wall Street, since unlike CalPERS, if Wall Street gained control over Lehman's portfolio they would be able to directly manipulate commodities markets.

An article written by Forbes at the time of Lehman Brothers' collapse makes that clear:

While everyone knows the U.S. government is looking to bail out Wall Street banks, few people realize that it's also bailing out speculative commodities traders in the process, fueling a sharp rise in energy prices.

Lehman Brothers and AIG held enormous trading positions in commodities markets. If these positions had been liquidated suddenly, the price of everything from wheat to oil would have collapsed [emphasis mine]. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the main regulator of U.S. commodity markets, allowed Wall Street investment banks and trading companies to take control of massive positions in commodities markets called swaps held by Lehman and AIG.

I chose to reference this particular article for two reasons. First, it was written by a Wall Street media "insider": Forbes Magazine. Second, the article was written based upon the clear premise of the author that the U.S. government had given Wall Street's cannibal-oligarchs control over those positions to protect commodity markets. In fact, the reality was the exact opposite of that.

More articles from Bullion Bulls Canada….



Clang! Clang! $400 Gold Warning

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:57 PM PDT

Bullion Vault
Phew! That was a close call from our tenured "contrarian gold" indicator…

YIKES! FOR ONE
horrible moment just then, I thought maybe the top was in.

"Gold has become the favored hedge against financial and monetary uncertainty," said Niall Ferguson, Harvard University and Business School's financial history professor, on Monday.

"It's certainly a time-tested way of coping with really turbulent markets."

Oh crikey! Niall Ferguson – our tenured contrarian gold indicator – now says gold is a proven defense against investment stress. It's taken 11 years and 356% gains in gold, but he's finally got it.

That's the top. Sell! Oh, hold on…

"But a lot of the upside is already there," Ferguson went on, live by video-link to the Wall Street Journal.

"The time to buy was in 1999, not 2010."

Phew! As you were, then, bloody-minded gold buyers. And as you relax, safe in the knowledge that Professor Wrong still says you shouldn't buy, let's remind ourselves just what it was he advised 11 years ago – back in 1999 – the "time to Buy Gold" as he now puts it…

"The twilight of gold appear[s] to have arrived. True, total blackout is still some way off…Gold has a future, of course, but mainly as jewelry."

Fast forward to late 2008 – some $445 higher per ounce for gold, slap-bang amid the post-Lehmans Crash crisis – and Professor Ferguson was at it again.

"I have been debating today whether Gold Bars really are the answer," Ferguson confessed to the New York Magazine when quizzed about his portfolio for one of many puff pieces that November.

But "they probably aren't," he decided…thereby leaving another $470 per ounce on the table over the last 18 months.

Now he says early summer 2010 is not the time to Buy Gold either. So, given what happened when he rejected the idea in mid-1999 and then in late 2008, expect another $400-or-so on the price before the Laurence A.Tisch Professor of History next weighs in with his forecast.

And meantime, the man whose last TV-and-book blockbuster, The Ascent of Money, concluded that "the state-owned bank [was] now close to extinction"…just as the UK nationalized one-third of its finance sector, and the US Fed bought $2 trillion of failing bank assets…now advises that "There are other ways to protect yourself, and maybe somewhat smarter ways."

Missing the point entirely again, Ferguson recommends – instead of gold – buying Norwegian and Swiss government debt as protection against…ummm…the sovereign debt crisis.

Clang! Clang! Everyone out!

Ready to Buy Gold…?



Gold Edges Lower, Silver Rises 0.9%

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:57 PM PDT

Bullion update ...Gold ended slightly lower on Thursday, marking the first decline in four days. More risk-taking and a rising euro were credited with pressuring precious metal demand, although silver, platinum and palladium posted attractive gains.

News of China's denial that it was reviewing its investments in European bonds was cited at a catalyst in prompting rallies in crude futures and in U.S. stocks, with oil soaring 4.3 percent and major stock indexes jumping between 2.85 percent and 3.73 percent.

(…)
Read the rest of Gold Edges Lower, Silver Rises 0.9% (2,154 words)


© CoinNews.net for Coin News, 2010. |
Permalink |
No comment |
Want more on these topics? Browse the archive of posts filed under Bullion Articles and Precious Metal Reports, Business News.



2010 US Quarters Silver Proof Set Issued

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:57 PM PDT

2010 America the Beautiful Quarters Silver Proof SetThe United States Mint today at noon Eastern Time released the 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Silver Proof Set™ for $32.95.

The offering is the first to include America the Beautiful Quarters that are struck in 90 percent silver, which is a reason the set is priced substantially higher than the clad quarters version that launched on May 13, 2010 for $14.95.

In fact, the silver set's five proof coins are composed of 0.904 ounces of silver. At the current silver spot of $18.47 an ounce, their intrinsic value alone is presently worth $16.70.

(…)
Read the rest of 2010 US Quarters Silver Proof Set Issued (227 words)


© CoinNews.net for Coin News, 2010. |
Permalink |
No comment |
Want more on these topics? Browse the archive of posts filed under American the Beautiful Quarters, Coin or Numismatic News, New Coin Releases.



Judy Shelton: The recovery starts with sound money

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:56 PM PDT

By Judy Shelton
The Wall Street Journal
Thursday, May 27, 2010

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870402620457526625191553020…

The euro is beset with fiscal calamities that threaten its downfall, and markets in the U.S. are roiled by uncertainty over the government's financial regulatory legislation. But don't worry. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner meets with European finance officials today to discuss the economic situation.

According to a Treasury Department statement, they will focus on "measures being taken to restore global confidence and financial stability." So everything is under control.

Right.

What government policy makers in the U.S. and Europe fail to realize is that far from being seen as capable of delivering economic salvation, they are increasingly perceived as primary contributors to global financial ruin. Whether it's the fiscal recklessness of spendthrift politicians or the refusal of government officials to acknowledge failings — distorting mortgage markets through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, skewing assessments of credit risk through loose monetary policy — the influence of government over the real economy is proving disastrous.

No wonder people are flocking to gold as they flee government-supplied money. Neither the dollar nor the euro inspires much global confidence; despite the dollar's relative safe-haven status, neither currency holds out the promise of financial stability.

How can the real economy, i.e., the private sector, where genuine wealth is actually produced, continue to function in the absence of reliable money? Europeans will be wary of the euro from now on, given that the European Central Bank has relaxed its standards for safeguarding monetary integrity by absorbing Greek debt. Meanwhile, the perilous fiscal condition of the U.S. has convinced many that our government will resort to future inflation to reduce its own untenable debt burden.

It's hard to see how economic recovery can proceed when citizens suspect that the monetary foundation beneath them is crumbling away. The willingness to work and sacrifice for the sake of future prosperity is a universal human quality — the hallmark of entrepreneurial faith — but people must believe there is a link between effort and reward. Money forges that link by providing a dependable store of value; in doing so, it performs a vital social function.

The private sector is fully capable of recovering from economic downturn if individuals have a meaningful tool of measurement for evaluating alternative choices in a competitive environment. Comparisons based on accurate, free-market price signals yield optimal economic outcomes. But what we are witnessing today is a clash between the real economy's will to resurrect itself and the persistent failure of government, here and abroad, to deliver an appropriate platform of sound money based on sound finances.

Even as the first inklings of rebounding growth can be discerned — increased retail sales, higher corporate profits — it takes only the latest headline about government failure to come to grips with deficit spending and accumulating sovereign debt to snuff out any potential market rally. Pledges to achieve balanced budgets by some distant future date do little to convince people that anything has really changed.

Tough rules to enforce fiscal discipline were part of the original plan for persuading Europeans to abandon national monies in favor of adopting a common currency. Limits on deficit spending and government debt were clearly stipulated in the Stability and Growth Pact — no more than a 3% budget deficit, maximum debt equal to 60% of GDP. But these criteria were quietly jettisoned years ago and have now been flagrantly breached en masse by European nations responding to the financial crisis with bailout packages and fiscal stimulus.

In the U.S., frustrations over Washington's seeming inability to resist fiscal profligacy have found voice in the tea party movement. As national sentiment grows in favor of limited government and constrained powers, legislation has been introduced in nine states to nullify federal legal tender laws; the Fed's monopoly on supplying the money U.S. citizens must use is being challenged by authorizing payment in gold and silver.

Invoking the 10th Amendment strictures of the Constitution, proponents argue that the Founding Fathers never intended to grant federal government both the right to borrow money as well as the power to manipulate the value of the monetary unit of account. Money linked to gold and silver retains its value, which prevents the medium of exchange from falling victim to the federal government's inherent conflict of interest if it can fund its own debt with money created from thin air. Updated for our times, a number of the legal tender proposals specify that citizens would be allowed to tap electronic exchange-traded funds (ETFs) backed 100% by gold or silver to conduct digital transactions with state government.

The idea of rising above the administrative dictates of fallible government to reclaim the virtues of sound money is profoundly liberating — and could prove economically empowering. Who believes that officials in Brussels or Frankfurt will safeguard the value of euro-denominated savings in the face of political pressures? Who expects the "Financial Stability Oversight Council," led by the Treasury secretary as prescribed in the regulatory overhaul bill, to spot the next asset bubble before it ruptures with catastrophic financial consequences for American retirement accounts?

The transition to a firmer monetary footing to support entrepreneurial capitalism could be initiated by linking major global reserve currencies to gold and silver — commodities long associated with monetary functions. It would logically begin with the dollar. As a first step, U.S. citizens could ask Congress to authorize the limited issuance of gold-backed Treasury bonds that would provide for payment of principal at maturity in either ounces of gold or the face value of the security, at the option of the holder.

The level of public confidence in fiat dollar obligations versus gold would be revealed through auction bidding, with yield spreads clearly reflecting aggregate expectations of their comparative values. In the same way that inflation-indexed Treasury bonds measure expectations about future changes in the Consumer Price Index, gold-backed Treasury bonds would provide a barometer of the Fed's credibility.

By linking the dollar to gold, Americans would establish a vital beachhead for sound money and provide a model that other nations could emulate.

—–

Ms. Shelton, author of "Money Meltdown" (Free Press, 1994), is a senior fellow at the Atlas Economic Research Foundation and co-director of the Atlas Sound Money Project.

* * *

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

http://www.gata.org

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

http://www.gata.org/node/16



Sentiment on Gold Deserves Some Tarnish

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:56 PM PDT

Macro Man submits:

In the wake of the great inflation/deflation debate, we had better take a look at gold, which appears to be denying the deflation leg of the argument and is now leaping directly to the "inflation should occur somewhere down the road and metal is only currency they aren't printing and so is store of value, etc." argument.

Even though all of that makes sense, I still can't quite come to grips with buying the stuff now, as I have just had my TDI (Taxi Driver Indicator) triggered on the way home last night, "you gotta be long gold innit." This came right after having my DPI (Dinner Party Indicator) triggered about a month ago.

Read more »



Capital Gold Group Report: Why Gold Is a Sure Long-Term Bet

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:56 PM PDT

by Porter Stansberry

May 25 2010 4:33PM
Daily Wealth

What a spectacle…

In an
utter and complete repudiation of its founding principles, the European
Union's central bank (ECB) has decided to copy the U.S. Federal
Reserve's 2008-2009 strategy of "papering over" Europe's massive debt
problems. The ECB will provide nearly unlimited credit to Europe's
sovereign borrowers, while also buying troubled assets from Europe's
largest banks.

This
latest development has caused a significant change in what I call "the
most important chart in the world."

Readers
of my investment advisory are familiar with the chart by now… as
we've been publishing it nearly every month… and even more frequently
in the daily S&A Digest. It shows the value of U.S.
government long bonds (represented by the fund "TLT"), the price of
gold (represented by "GLD"), and the price of silver (represented by
"SLV").

This
is the battle for monetary supremacy… The market is arguing over a
fundamental question: What is money? Dollars? Gold? Or silver?

For
more than 60 years, the U.S. dollar has unquestionably been the world's
safest, most liquid form of money – its reserve currency. During times
of economic trouble, investors rush to buy U.S. bonds as a safe haven,
causing their value to rise sharply.

And
that's what happened – briefly – during the Greek crisis last month.
But then, something changed. As soon as the ECB announced its big
bailout and established a swap line with the U.S. Treasury (more about
this below), investors realized there's no real difference between the
U.S. dollar and the euro. They are simply different names for
the same thing: paper money.
And investors understand the
value of paper money may finally collapse under the weight of these
massive sovereign debts.

What
did investors buy when they sold the U.S. dollar in this crisis? Where
did they run? As you can see, in reaction to the ECB announcement,
investors bought gold… and to an increasing degree, silver. I believe
this preference for metallic money will continue to strengthen as the
financial problems of the U.S. Treasury begin to mount.

If
you ignore this trend, you will be financially destroyed over the next
several years.
If you act now to protect yourself and your
family, it will be the greatest single investment decision of your
life.

Now…
let's look more closely at what the Europeans have done to stave off
the collapse of the European Union…

To
maintain a veneer of legality, the ECB will create an off-balance-sheet
entity to "borrow" roughly $1 trillion from itself, the U.S. Federal
Reserve, and the IMF. Europe's member states agreed to guarantee these
debts, which the ECB claims will be "riskless" because they're simply
loans between central banks.

At the
root of every paper currency arrangement is a simple scheme to grant
credit where none is due. In this case, the scheme is designed to give
credit to bankrupt governments in the European Union, via guarantees
from those same bankrupt governments and additional credit from the
U.S. Treasury, which is itself a troubled creditor at best.

In
short, the ECB is going to print up lots of Euros and give them to the
least creditworthy states and the worst bankers in Europe.

The
politicians apparently believe this massive infusion of new money and
credit will "jumpstart" the European economy, which will then produce
enough tax revenue and banking profits to finance these new debts.
Don't laugh…

Meanwhile,
to ensure this action doesn't result in a collapse of the euro
currency, the Federal Reserve has agreed to open a "swap" line, which
will allow the ECB to fund as much of these news "loans" with dollars
as is necessary to prevent a run on their currency.

Will
this work? At the risk of dramatic future inflation, will creditors
really be willing to accept devalued Euros, which offer investors
almost nothing in interest payments? I don't think there's a chance in
hell.

The
reason paper money systems always fail is because they provide no
practical limit to credit. New currency reserves can always be printed.
Bad debts – credit defaults – can be "papered over" rather than
restructured. The stability of paper money systems seems like a virtue.
The ability to simply manufacture money – without a deposit or true
asset as collateral – is the ultimate financial sinecure. As long as
confidence in the system remains, the amount of credit that can be
manufactured seems limitless.

Unfortunately,
this always leads to more debt. At some point, the whole system simply
collapses. The debts become so large, they create an untenable
economic imbalance, overwhelming the real economy. And when the credit
bubble finally bursts, it doesn't destroy just one or two banks' house
of cards. It wipes out the entire system, which is linked together by
the currency itself.

Remember…
this just isn't about problems in far-off Europe. The U.S. is in the
same situation: under huge debts we cannot hope to repay.

Capital Gold Group, gold group, gold, gold prices, gold news, gold coins, gold bullion, gold IRA, IRA
gold

Read more….



Today's Action Hints the Gold Price Will Break Upwards

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:43 PM PDT

Gold Price Close Today : 1211.90Change: -1.50 or -0.1%Silver Price Close Today : 18.457Change 16.2 cents or 0.9%Platinum Price Close Today: 1559.10Change: 37.80 or 2.5%Palladium Price Close Today:...

This is a summary only. Visit GOLDPRICE.ORG for the full article, gold price charts in ounces grams and kilos in 23 national currencies, and more!


Big Upswing Brings Nasdaq Green For 2010

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:38 PM PDT

andy wangAndy Wang submits:

The market jumped out of the gate today on China's show of confidence in European debt, even though the latest jobs report may not have been inspiring. Investors rushed back in to pick up tech stocks, sending Nasdaq roaring up +81.8 points and into the green for 2010. Google (GOOG) added $15 to close above $490. GOOG has completed its $750 million acquisition of mobile advertising network AdMob and will start buying $750 million of its stock on the open market. High-flyers back in April were flying again: SanDisk (SNDK) +7.55%, Broadcom (BRCM) +6.25%, F5 Networks (FFIV) +6.59%. Apple (AAPL) added +9.24 to close at $253.35. Baidu (BIDU) vaulted +8.74%, trading at $73.5 (that's back to $735 pre-split)! Amazon (AMZN) and Research in Motion (RIMM) also made nice gains, up +2.83% and +4.05%, respectively.

Miners were very strong. In my Sector Watch for this week, we discussed the coal stocks bouncing with the market. This sector was among the strongest today: Walter Industries (WLT) +6.45%, Cliffs (CLF) +8.32%, Peabody (BTU) +5.82%, Arch Coal (ACI) +6.05%.


Complete Story »


Japan Sliding Into Dodecatuple Dip Recession

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:27 PM PDT


A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, fundamentals used to matter. In this place tonight's news that Japan is slipping back into its +/-20th sequential recession would have resulted in a plunge in the Nikkei, and a lot of overtime work for the Japanese plunge protection team, which unlike its US equivalent, does not hide in the shadows, and is well-known to intervene when equities plummet. Earlier, Japan announced that not only did its jobless rate increase more than the expected 5%, hitting 5.1%, once again openly starting on its one way trek to the record 5.6% achieved at the trough of the crisis, but deflation also picked up, hitting -1.5% in April (and where prices did not fall, they were supported by government subsidies), and completing the trifecta was that household spending came in at -0.7%, after estimates called for a 2.5% increase after the 4.4% prior reading. Instead, in our current galaxy, the Nikkei was up 1.5% because China said that it would not sell its European bonds, an act which would have brought the euro to parity and slashed the value of China's trillions in foreign reserves by about 10% overnight (also, the fact that a dollar-strapped BOJ demanded $200 million in FX swaps from the Fed was certainly also not lost on the market). Gee, it is truly shocking they did not confirm they are selling their German bond holdings. After all, even PIMCO is liquidating its European exposure: we would contend that China is not all that much dumber than Bill Gross.

From Bloomberg:

Finance Minister Naoto Kan cited “severe” job prospects this week as one factor that has kept the government from upgrading its assessment of the economy since March.

A separate government report today showed the ratio of jobs to applicants fell to 0.48, meaning there are 48 jobs for every 100 candidates. It was the first deterioration in the measure in eight months.

Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. aims to reduce its workforce by about 10 percent, it said this month. Asia’s largest drugmaker wants to save 50 billion yen ($550 million) over three years.

Japanese retailers continue to cut prices to spur consumer spending. Nitori Co., a furniture retailer, this week said it will lower prices of about 500 items by as much as 40 percent - - the company’s ninth round of discounts since 2008.

“Spending on some items, such as cars and home electrical appliances, are robust thanks to government subsidies, but consumers are still penny-pinching for everyday products,” said Daiwa Research’s Watanabe.

But can't Japan just print, print, print and stimulate inflation? Well, not really... remember that whole 200% debt/GDP thing?

The Bank of Japan has faced pressure to fight deflation from the government, whose ability to spur the economy is constrained by record public debt. Kan has been urging the bank to adopt an inflation target, and last week repeated that he expects it to support the recovery.

Central bank Governor Masaaki Shirakawa this week warned against becoming too fixated on prices when setting policy. Central banks should aim to achieve a stable financial environment that helps sustain growth, and price stability is “not the sole factor,” he said.

Japan's deflationary collapse has been blamed on the BOJ for not having taken the same abrupt and dramatic QE measures that the Fed has rushed into. On one hand, that is true, and is the reason why instead of burning out on a short-term sugar high, Japan has now seen twenty years of economic decline. On the other hand, it means that America will never hit Japan's sad record of 2 lost decades, as the Fed has already shot 5 out of 6 bullets in its gun. As Bob Janjuah pointed out earlier today, there is just one bullet left. And we have a feeling before all is said and down, instead of shooting the ever angrier bear, which is getting closer by the minute, Bernanke may decide to play Russian roulette instead.


The Depression Of 2011? 23 Economic Warning Signs From Financial Authorities All Over The Globe

Posted: 27 May 2010 01:12 PM PDT

Could the world economy be headed for a depression in 2011?  As inconceivable as that may seem to a lot of people, the truth is that top economists and governmental authorities all over the globe say that the economic warning signs are there and that we need to start paying attention to them.  The two primary ingredients for a depression are debt and fear, and the reality is that we have both of them in abundance in the financial world today.  In response to the global financial meltdown of 2007 and 2008, governments around the world spent unprecedented amounts of money and got into a ton of debt.  All of that spending did help bail out the global banking system, but now that an increasing number of governments around the world are in need of bailouts themselves, what is going to happen?  We have already seen the fear that is generated when one small little nation like Greece even hints at defaulting.  When it becomes apparent that quite a few governments around the globe cannot handle their debt burdens, what kind of shockwave is that going to send through financial markets? 

The truth is that we are facing the greatest sovereign debt crisis in modern history.  There is no way out of this financial mess that does not include a significant amount of economic pain. 

When you add mountains of debt to paralyzing fear to strict austerity measures, what do you get?

What you get is deflationary pressure and financial markets that seize up.

Some of the top financial authorities in the world are warning us that unless something substantial is done, that is exactly what we are going to be seeing as 2010 turns into 2011.

Of course some governments around the world could try to put these economic problems off for a while by printing and borrowing even more money, but we all know by now that only makes the long-term problems even worse.

For now, however, it seems as though most governments are opting for the austerity measures that the IMF seems determined to cram down the throats of everyone.

So what will austerity measures mean for the global economy?

Think "stimulus" in reverse.

Yes, things are going to get messy.

It looks like there is going to be a great deal of economic fear and a great deal of economic pain in 2011 and the years beyond that.

So are we headed for "the depression of 2011"? 

Well, let's hear what some of the top financial experts in the world have to say....     

#1) Economist Nouriel Roubini:

"We are still in the middle of this crisis and there is more trouble ahead of us, even if there is a recovery. During the great depression the economy contracted between 1929 and 1933, there was the beginning of a recovery, but then a second recession from 1937 to 1939. If you don't address the issues, you risk having a double-dip recession and one which is at least as severe as the first one."

#2) Bank of England Governor Mervyn King:

"Dealing with a banking crisis was difficult enough, but at least there were public-sector balance sheets on to which the problems could be moved. Once you move into sovereign debt, there is no answer; there's no backstop."

#3) German Chancellor Angela Merkel:

"The current crisis facing the euro is the biggest test Europe has faced for decades, even since the Treaty of Rome was signed in 1957."

#4) Paul Donovan, the Senior Economist at UBS:

"Now people are questioning if the euro will even exist in three years."

#5) Michael Pento, Chief Economist at Delta Global Advisors:

"The crisis in Greece is going to spread to Spain and it's going to be very difficult to deal with. They are bailing out debt with more debt and it isn't sustainable. It's a wonderful scenario for gold."

#6) LEAP/E2020:

"LEAP/E2020 believes that the global systemic crisis will experience a new tipping point from Spring 2010. Indeed, at that time, the public finances of the major Western countries are going to become unmanageable, as it will simultaneously become clear that new support measures for the economy are needed because of the failure of the various stimuli in 2009, and that the size of budget deficits preclude any significant new expenditures."

#7) Telegraph Columnist Edmund Conway:

"Whatever yardstick you care to choose – share-price moves, the rates at which banks lend to each other, measures of volatility – we are now in a similar position to 2008."

#8) Peter Morici, an Economics Professor at the University of Maryland:

"The next financial tsunami is emerging and will ripple to America."

#9) Bob Chapman of the International Forecaster:

"The green shoots of recovery have now turned into poison ivy. The abyss has again been filled with more debt and more fiat currency. In the process the Fed and now the ECB have lost all credibility."

#10) Telegraph Columnist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard:

"The M3 money supply in the United States is contracting at an accelerating rate that now matches the average decline seen from 1929 to 1933, despite near zero interest rates and the biggest fiscal blitz in history."

#11) Professor Tim Congdon from International Monetary Research:

"The plunge in M3 has no precedent since the Great Depression. The dominant reason for this is that regulators across the world are pressing banks to raise capital asset ratios and to shrink their risk assets. This is why the US is not recovering properly."

#12) Reuters Columnist Iliana Jonas:

"The default rate for commercial mortgages held by banks in the first quarter hit its highest level since at least 1992 and is expected to surpass that by year-end and peak in 2011, according to a study by Real Capital Analytics."

#13) Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize-winning Economist:

"It's not hard to see Japan-style deflation emerging if the economy stays weak."

#14) Stan Humphries, Chief Economist for Zillow.com:

"Anyone expecting a robust rebound in the housing market ... will be sorely disappointed."

#15) Fox News:

"As the national debt clock ticked past the ignominious $13 trillion mark overnight, Congress pressed to pass a host of supplemental spending bills."

#16) Bloomberg:

"The U.S. government's Aaa bond rating will come under pressure in the future unless additional measures are taken to reduce projected record budget deficits, according to Moody's Investors Service Inc."

#17) Peter Schiff:

"When creditors ultimately decide to curtail loans to America, U.S. interest rates will finally spike, and we will be confronted with even more difficult choices than those now facing Greece. Given the short maturity of our national debt, a jump in short-term rates would either result in default or massive austerity. If we choose neither, and opt to print money instead, the run-a-way inflation that will ensue will produce an even greater austerity than the one our leaders lacked the courage to impose. Those who believe rates will never rise as long as the Fed remains accommodative, or that inflation will not flare up as long as unemployment remains high, are just as foolish as those who assured us that the mortgage market was sound because national real estate prices could never fall."

#18) The National League of Cities:

"City budget shortfalls will become more severe over the next two years as tax collections catch up with economic conditions.  These will inevitably result in new rounds of layoffs, service cuts, and canceled projects and contracts."

#19) Dan Domenech, Executive Director of the American Association of School Administrators:

"Faced with continued budgetary constraints, school leaders across the nation are forced to consider an unprecedented level of layoffs that would negatively impact economic recovery and deal a devastating blow to public education."

#20) Mike Whitney:

"Without another boost of stimulus, the economy will lapse back into recession sometime by the end of 2010."

#21) Kevin Giddis, Managing Director of Fixed Income at Morgan Keegan:

"There is big money making big bets that at a minimum we we'll have a recession if not a depression that could last for years."

#22) John P. Hussman, Ph.D.:

"In my estimation, there is still close to an 80% probability (Bayes' Rule) that a second market plunge and economic downturn will unfold during the coming year. This is not certainty, but the evidence that we've observed in the equity market, labor market, and credit markets to-date is simply much more consistent with the recent advance being a component of a more drawn-out and painful deleveraging cycle."

#23) Richard Russell, the Famous Author of the Dow Theory Letters:

"Do your friends a favor. Tell them to "batten down the hatches" because there's a HARD RAIN coming. Tell them to get out of debt and sell anything they can sell (and don't need) in order to get liquid. Tell them that Richard Russell says that by the end of this year they won't recognize the country. They'll retort, "How the dickens does Russell know -- who told him?" Tell them the stock market told him."


In The News Today

Posted: 27 May 2010 12:06 PM PDT

Dear CIGAs,

Not exactly politically correct, but absolutely true.

jose

 

Jim Sinclair's Commentary

This is exactly what General Tommy Franks said in different words when he retired as General in charge in Iraq years ago.

It was carried in an interview in Cigar Aficionado. We posted it here and it is on the compendium as well.

"Must we, under the happy hope of a false tranquility, sacrifice to the people in power the public welfare, and under vain pretense of preserving the peace, abandon the empire to robbers who would plunder it"
— Helvetius

Jim Sinclair's Commentary

This is a reaching video that takes only 3 minutes of your time.

While listening to it keep in mind that the USA is the largest debtor nation. The economic recovery is more MOPE than real & sustainable.

http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=H0a_FA_J6Sw

Jim Sinclair's Commentary

Meet Buddy, the newest addition to the gang.

IMG_3501

 

Jim Sinclair's Commentary

Euro intervention has now occurred four times between $1.215 and $1.225.

The link between the euro and gold's price is loosening again, favoring gold. Let's keep focus on that relationship.

There is heavy euro selling between $1.25 and $1.26. The following story might just be a vehicle for the opposite.

China denies report of euro review.
China denied a report that it's reviewing its foreign exchange holdings of euro assets, calling such speculation "groundless." "Europe has been, and will be one of the major markets for investing China's exchange reserves," said the State Administration of Foreign Exchange. Euro

Jim Sinclair's Commentary

Please consider subscribing to John's excellent service. His explanations are contained in his subscriber only essays.

- Gross Domestic Income Continues Showing Slower Growth than Gross Domestic Product 
- Massive Revisions to Durable Goods Orders 
- Employment Set to Retrench Anew (Net of Census Impact)

"No. 298: GDP and New Orders for Durable Goods Revisions "
http://www.shadowstats.com/

Jim Sinclair's Commentary

Note Libor rose again this morning. Until Libor stabilizes at a given range a lock up on credit markets in Europe is still a great risk.

Foreign U.S. Commercial Paper Issuance Falls Most in 10 Months
By Bryan Keogh and Christopher Condon

May 27 (Bloomberg) — U.S. commercial paper outstanding sold by foreign financial companies and their domestic units fell the most in 10 months as fund managers trim holdings of the short-term debt issued by European banks.

Total debt has dropped $18.6 billion, or 4.8 percent, in May to an eight-month low of $365 billion, the Federal Reserve said today on its website. The amount outstanding has declined for the past four weeks.

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA, Spain's second-biggest bank, has been unable to renew about $1 billion of commercial paper this month, the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday, highlighting investor concerns that Europe's sovereign debt crisis will saddle banks with losses.

That reflects "how fearful" U.S. fund managers are of BBVA as a counterparty risk, compelling the bank to turn to cheaper regional financing ,Andrew Lim, an analyst at Matrix Corporate Capital LLP in London, wrote today in a note to clients.

"The funds are merely shortening maturities and letting paper roll off, rather than fleeing," said Peter Crane, president of Crane Data LLC, a money-fund research firm in Westborough, Massachusetts.

More…

Jim Sinclair's Commentary

Now these two articles demonstrate clearly how the US legislative works.

Feds Issue Terror Watch for the Texas/Mexico Border
By Jana Winter
Published May 26, 2010

The Department of Homeland Security is alerting Texas authorities to be on the lookout for a suspected member of the Somalia-based Al Shabaab terrorist group who might be attempting to travel to the U.S. through Mexico, a security expert who has seen the memo tells FOXNews.com.

The warning follows an indictment unsealed this month in Texas federal court that accuses a Somali man in Texas of running a "large-scale smuggling enterprise" responsible for bringing hundreds of Somalis from Brazil through South America and eventually across the Mexican border. Many of the illegal immigrants, who court records say were given fake IDs, are alleged to have ties to other now-defunct Somalian terror organizations that have merged with active organizations like Al Shabaab, al-Barakat and Al-Ittihad Al-Islami.

In 2008, the U.S. government designated Al Shabaab a terrorist organization. Al Shabaab has said its priority is to impose Sharia, or Islamic law, on Somalia; the group has aligned itself with Al Qaeda and has made statements about its intent to harm the United States.

In recent years, American Somalis have been recruited by Al Shabaab to travel to Somalia, where they are often radicalized by more extremist or operational anti-American terror groups, which Al Shabaab supports. The recruiters coming through the Mexican border are the ones who could be the most dangerous, according to law enforcement officials.

Security experts tell FOXNews.com that the influx of hundreds of Somalis over the U.S. border who allegedly have ties to suspected terror cells is evidence of a porous and unsecured border being exploited by groups intent on wrecking deadly havoc on American soil.

More…


Forecasting U.S. Stock Returns

Posted: 27 May 2010 12:02 PM PDT

Brad DeLong submits:

Safari

Neil Hume of FT Alphaville directs us to Jim Reid of Deutsche Bank:

A century-long look at the US equity market: If you are a market historian, you have to decide whether the 1900-[to]-end-1994 best fit line was vaguely the correct basis for a long-term trend of equity prices or whether you believe something changed fundamentally in the mid-1990s in a positive manner (earnings?, the economy?, EM?) that permanently elevated the price level of Western equity markets. If you don’t believe that anything really changed from the mid-1990s (maybe only debt levels?) then the Dow at 10,000 still historically looks a bit stretched....


Complete Story »


Will French Minister's Announcement That Bailout Is Prohibited By Bailout Clause Lead To New EUR Weakness

Posted: 27 May 2010 12:00 PM PDT


The power games among the ranks of Europe's puppet elite continue (the real elite as is well known consists of a few CEOs of insolvent banks). Earlier today, Pierre Lellouche, France's Europe minister, came out with another statement our of left field, that could set off the next round of European destabilization. In an interview with the FT, Lellouche said that the €440 billion European bailout "is an enormous change. It explains some of the reticence. It is expressly forbidden in the treaties by the famous no bail-out clause. De facto, we have changed the treaty.” As the bailout is already being pursued by various German scholars on grounds it is forbidden by the EU constitution, this statement will not be taken lightly by Germany which has had to lose major internal political credibility to enforce a bail out that it itself is not enamored with. Sure enough, the FT notes: "Mr Lellouche’s  comments are likely to go down badly in Germany, where the government has insisted the debt guarantee scheme to help beleaguered eurozone members is a temporary mechanism, set up on an intergovernmental basis where Berlin retains a veto, and in no way implies a breach of the EU’s treaties." Furthermore, as was noted previously, a finding that the bailout is not constitutional would render the entire support mechanism moot, resulting in the imminent bankruptcy of Greece. Is this yet another concerted subversive effort on behalf of the European labor interests to expel the underperforming PIIGS and sink the euro?

From the FT:

The eurozone’s €440bn debt guarantee scheme is tantamount to the adoption of a Nato-style mutual defence clause and marks an “unprecedented” change to the bloc’s treaties, according to France’s Europe minister.

In an interview with the Financial Times, Pierre Lellouche laid bare the French government’s conviction that the emergency stabilisation scheme agreed earlier this month amounted to a fundamental revision of the European Union’s rules and a leap towards an economic government for the bloc.

Mr Lellouche said Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, was “right” to say the EU could not be a “transfer zone” where rich members directly subsidised poorer ones.

But he said the scheme institutionalised solidarity between states. “The €440bn mechanism is nothing less than the importation of Nato’s Article 5 mutual defence clause applied to the eurozone. When one member is under attack the others are obliged to come to its defence.”

Mr Lellouche rejected suggestions that the Franco-German relationship had broken down because of tensions over the Greek and eurozone bail-out plans.

But he conceded that it required a lot of effort to make the relationship work, likening the challenge to postwar reconciliation between the two countries.

“The Franco-German relationship doesn’t work all by itself. Going back to the Schuman declaration, that was an extremely ambitious initiative. That was only five years after the war, after the occupation, after Oradour-sur-Glane [site of a Nazi atrocity in France], after Auschwitz. To hold out our hands and offer a partnership of equals with Germany required a lot of vision. That’s a bit what it is like today.”

On the other hand, this is most likely just France attempting to regain some shred of Eurozone influence after Germany has taken a material lead in leadership following its unilateral announcement of the naked-short ban.

The eurozone rescue plan has proved divisive in Germany but enjoys broad support in France. On the other hand, there was a consensus in Germany behind the sacrifices necessary to make German industry more competitive. When it comes to showing solidarity with Greece, France is miraculously united. But when it comes to drawing the consequences for us here in France, on reform of pensions, on reducing costs, on competitiveness, on working time, there is unfortunately less of a consensus. I regret that.

Alternatively, as a ZH reader suggests, "politicians know that austerity plans will be their death. They need the eurozone to blow apart, so they can all join the race to the currency bottom which for politicians is preferential to austerity." As we pointed out two days ago, the Eurozone, and especially its sicker members, likely will push the limits of seeing how far they can push their "bailouters", now that such a thing as "consequences to wrong actions" no longer exist. Either way, whether due to natural causes or sabotage, Europe will likely not survive in its current format for more than a year or two. And as Albert Edwards pointed out earlier, due to the resulting global imbalances, the US will be on that particular titanic, enjoying each and every blow as the Keynesian system sinks.


What Credit Ratings Are For

Posted: 27 May 2010 11:58 AM PDT

david merkelDavid Merkel submits:

Why do we have credit ratings? What are the main reasons they exist?

  • To provide profits to those that rate credit.
  • To provide credit standards for regulators and creditors (shame on you, do your homework) that can’t judge credit risk.
  • To allow debtors to easily issue debt; simplifying the pricing decisions of creditors.
  • Providing quantitative and qualitative analyses of new and existing debt issues, particularly small ones where it could not be economic for an asset manager to do his own analysis.

But credit ratings don’t exist for perfection. Rating agencies are encouraged to rate new structures and new collateral types, whether they have good data or not. Regulators need a rating for any asset they allow, and new asset classes should be viewed skeptically by analysts.


Complete Story »


No comments:

Post a Comment